Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
Transcript of Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
1/27
Technical workers at 3M spend up to 15 percent of
their time working on projects of their own choosing.1 This is openly encouraged by 3M as long as the project has the
potential to become an important breakthrough for the company.
The “15 percent rule” has been a central part of 3M’s overall
culture of innovation since being introduced by company presi-
dent William McKnight in 1948. The innovative culture is further
encouraged by the “30 percent rule” that requires each division
to produce 30 percent of its annual revenue from products that
did not exist five years ago.3M clearly prizes delegation and initiative, and has a strong
tolerance for failure. Managers are directed to “hire the right
people, and then get out of the way.” The company culture
emphasizes that a failure can turn into a success; there is no
punishment for a product failing in the market. The human
resources team also plays a pivotal role in reinforcing a stronger,
customer-oriented culture through regular training programs
that focus on the acronym E = MC2 (Engagement = More
Customer Connect).
Implementation of these practices has built a company with
over 76 000 employees and annual revenue of $23 billion, and
has placed 3M at the forefront of innovative companies globally. After the bursting of the dot-com bubble in 2001, however, there
was a shift in thinking at the company. James McNerney was
hired from General Electric as president to deal with what was felt
to be too great a focus on innovation and creativity. He was asked
to make the company more efficient using the Six Sigma disci-
pline (a quality control philosophy) and to “whip the company into
shape.” McNerney left in 2005 to run Boeing, and the new CEO
and president, George Buckley, was left with the task of rebuilding
3M’s traditional innovative culture, which many felt had suffered as
a result of the emphasis on process improvement. Buckley was
succeeded as president of 3M by Inge Thulin in 2012.
Learning Outcomes
❶ Compare and contrast the actions
of managers according to the
omnipotent and symbolic views.
❷ Discuss the characteristics and
importance of organizational
culture.
❸ Describe what kinds of cultures
managers can create.
❹ Describe the features of the specific
and general organizational environ-
ments.
Are managers free to do whatever they want? In this chapter,
we’ll look at the factors that define the discretion managers
have in doing their jobs. These factors are both internal
(the organization’s culture) and external (the organizational
environment). After reading and studying this chapter, you
will achieve the following learning outcomes.
CHAPTER❷
Organizational Culture and the
Organizational Environment
ZUMA Press/Alamy
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
2/27
36 Part 1 DEFINING THE MANAGER’S TERRAIN
The Manager: Omnipotent or Symbolic?How much difference does a manager make in how an organization performs? The
dominant view in management theory and society in general is that managers are directly
responsible for an organization’s success or failure. We will call this perspective the
omnipotent view of management . In contrast, some observers have argued that much
of an organization’s success or failure is due to external forces outside managers’ control.
This perspective has been labelled the symbolic view of management . Let’s look more
closely at each of these perspectives so that we can try to clarify just how much credit or
blame managers should receive for their organizations’ performance.
The Omnipotent ViewIn Chapter 1 we discussed the importance of managers to organizations. This view reflects
a dominant assumption in management theory: The quality of an organization’s managers
determines the quality of the organization itself. It’s assumed that differences in an orga-
nization’s effectiveness or efficiency are due to the decisions and actions of its managers.
Good managers anticipate change, exploit opportunities, correct poor performance, and lead
their organizations toward their goals, which may be changed if necessary. When profits are
up, managers take the credit and reward themselves with bonuses, stock options, and the
like—even if they had little to do with the positive outcomes. When profits are down, top
managers are often fired in the belief that “new blood” will bring improved results. The buck
stops here! Following the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico in April 2010, people were enraged
when BP CEO Tony Hayward attended a weekend sailing event in which his yacht Bob was
competing. The following Monday, Hayward was removed from direct responsibility for
the cleanup. By early July 2010, there was speculation that the leadership at BP would be
cleared out, including Hayward as well as Carl-Henric Svanberg, the Swedish chairman who
in his apology to those affected by the spill referred to the “small people.”2 Though Svanberg
ultimately remained chairman, BP later agreed to a $4.5 billion settlement with the U.S.
Department of Justice, while three BP employees were later indicted with criminal charges.
The view of managers as omnipotent is consistent with the stereotypical picture of the
take-charge business executive who can overcome any obstacle in carrying out the organi-
zation’s goals. This omnipotent view, of course, is not limited to business organizations.
We can also use it to help explain the high turnover among college and professional sportscoaches, who can be considered the “managers” of their teams. Coaches who lose more
games than they win are seen as ineffective. They are fired and replaced by new coaches
who, it is hoped, will correct the inadequate performance.
In the omnipotent view, when organizations perform poorly, someone has to be held
accountable regardless of the reasons, and in our society, that “someone” is the manager.
Of course, when things go well, we need someone to praise. So managers also get the
credit—even if they had little to do with achieving positive outcomes.
The Symbolic View When tunnelling for the Canada Line transit system started tearing up Vancouver’s Cambie
Street, a busy shopping area, customers stopped coming to the stores and restaurants.
The street was noisy, there was no parking, and the area was a traffic nightmare. Facing a
❶ Compare and contrastthe actions of managersaccording to the omni-potent and symbolicviews.
omnipotent view of
management The view that
managers are directly responsible
for an organization’s success orfailure.
symbolic view of
management The view that much
of an organization’s success or
failure is due to external forces
outside managers’ control.
Think About It
What would it be like to work at 3M? How would you feel about having 15 percent of your time to
work on projects that meet your personal agenda? What kinds of resistance might James McNerney
have encountered when he tried to establish a new culture of efficiency in the face of the established
culture of innovation? What challenges might George Buckley have encountered when he became
CEO in 2005? How does the 3M culture differ from the work cultures you have experienced?
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
3/27
Chapter 2 Organizational Culture and the Organizational Environment 37
significant drop in customers, Christian Gaudreault, owner of Tomato Fresh Food Café,
moved his restaurant elsewhere. Giriaj Gautam, who runs the Cambie General Store,
found his sales down 25 percent and hoped he could hang on until construction finished
up in the area, more than a year after it started. Was the declining revenue the result of
decisions and actions by Gaudreault and Gautam, or was it the result of factors beyond
their control? Similarly, when a massive power outage hit Ontario, mad cow disease struck
in Alberta, and the avian flu killed chickens in British Columbia, were these the result of
managerial actions or circumstances outside managers’ control? The symbolic view would
suggest the latter.
The symbolic view says that a manager’s ability to affect outcomes is influenced and
constrained by external factors.4 According to this view, it’s unreasonable to expect manag-
ers to significantly affect an organization’s performance. Instead, an organization’s resultsare influenced by factors managers do not control, such as the economy, customers,
government policies, competitors’ actions, industry conditions, control over proprietary
technology, and decisions made by previous managers.
According to the symbolic view, managers merely symbolize control and inf lu-
ence.5 How? They create meaning out of randomness, confusion, and ambiguity or
try to innovate and adapt. Because managers have a limited effect on organizational
outcomes, their actions involve developing plans, making decisions, and engaging in
other managerial activities for the benefit of shareholders, customers, employees, and
the public. However, the part that managers actually play in organizational success or
failure is minimal.
Reality Suggests a SynthesisIn reality, managers are neither helpless nor all powerful. Internal and external constraints
that restrict a manager’s decision options exist within every organization. Internal con-
straints arise from the organization’s culture, and external constraints come from the
organization’s environment.
As Exhibit 2-1 shows, managers operate within the limits imposed by the organiza-
tion’s culture and environment. Yet, despite these constraints, managers are not powerless.
They can still influence an organization’s performance. In the remainder of this chapter,
we discuss how an organization’s culture and environment impose limits on managers.
However, as we will see in other chapters, these constraints don’t mean that a manager’s
hands are tied. As George Buckley of 3M recognized, managers can and do influence their
culture and environment.
When both Home Hardware
and Army and Navy closed their
stores in downtown Regina, Blue
Mantle, a thrift store in the same
area, faced a loss of customer
traffic and sales. As a result, Dave
Barrett, the store’s manager at
the time, closed Blue Mantle soon
after. He explained his decision:
“When Home Hardware closed,
and department store Army and
Navy closed, that cut away a
lot of our traffic to the store. We
used to have lots of seniors that
would swing over to our place.”
He also noted that the state of the
economy was a factor in the store
closing.3 The Roman Catholic
Archdiocese of Regina eventu-
ally re-opened Blue Mantle after
receiving numerous requests from
customers, and now runs the
store with volunteers.
Don Healy/Leader Post
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
4/27
38 Part 1 DEFINING THE MANAGER’S TERRAIN
The Organization’s Culture
Every organization has a culture, a way that those in the organization interact with each
other and with their clients or customers. When George Buckley was appointed president and CEO
of 3M following the departure of James McNerney, he faced a crisis of confidence in what really
mattered at 3M—either innovation or efficiency. McNerney had brought a passion for efficiency with
him from GE, and the remnants of this new culture were still in place even as 3M declared a returnto the focus on innovation.6
Watch on MyManagementLab
Organizational Culture (TWZ Role Play)
❷ Discuss thecharacteristicsand importance oforganizational culture.
Organizational Environment Organizational CultureManagerialDiscretion
Exhibit 2-1
Parameters of Managerial Discretion
Think About It
What is organizational culture, and how did it affect both James McNerney’s and George Buckley’s
ability to manage? Is the impact of culture different if the organization is a not-for-profit rather than
a business organization?
We know that every person has a unique personality—a set of relatively permanent
and stable traits that influence the way we act and interact with others. When we describe
someone as warm, open, relaxed, shy, or aggressive, we are describing personality traits. An
organization, too, has a personality, which we call its culture . It is that culture that influ-
ences the way employees act and interact with others.
What Is Organizational Culture?In September 2013, Hudson’s Bay Company announced the appointment of Marigay
McKee as the new president for the recently acquired Saks Fifth Avenue.7 As chief
merchant of Harrods, McKee had overseen the planning and implementation of the
merchandising and creative strategies since 2011. HBC, founded in 1670, is North
America’s longest continually operated company. In Canada, HBC operates Hudson’s
Bay, Canada’s largest department store with 90 locations, Home Outfitters with 69locations and in the United States, HBC operates Lord & Taylor, a department store
with 48 full-line store locations throughout the northeastern United States. Hudson’s
Bay Company operating units provide stylish, quality merchandise at great value, with
a dedicated focus on service excellence. Saks Fifth Avenue, one of the world’s pre-
eminent specialty retailers, is renowned for its superlative American and international
designer collections. Saks operates 41 full-line stores in 20 states, and five international
licensed stores. Given the long-established traditions in place at HBC and Saks and
the different targeted markets, what challenges are likely to arise as the two company
cultures are merged?
What is organizational culture ? It’s a system of shared meaning and beliefs held by
organizational members that determines, in large degree, how they act toward each other
and outsiders. It represents a common perception held by an organization’s members
organizational culture The
shared values, principles,
traditions, and ways of doing
things that influence the way
organizational members act and
that distinguish the organization
from other organizations.
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
5/27
Chapter 2 Organizational Culture and the Organizational Environment 39
that influences how they behave. In every organization, there are values, symbols, rituals,
myths, and practices that have evolved over time.8 These shared values and experiences
determine, in large degree, what employees perceive and how they respond to their world. 9
When faced with problems or issues, the organizational culture—the “way we do things
around here”—influences what employees can do and how they conceptualize, define,
analyze, and resolve issues. When considering different job offers, it makes sense to evalu-
ate whether you can fit into the organization’s culture.
Our definition of organizational culture implies three things:
● Culture is a perception . It’s not something that can be physically touched or
seen, but employees perceive it on the basis of what they experience within the
organization.
● Culture is a descriptive term. It’s concerned with how members perceive the organi-
zation, not with whether they like it.
● Culture is shared . Even though individuals may have different backgrounds or
work at different organizational levels, they tend to describe the organization’s
culture in similar terms. That’s the shared aspect of culture.
Research suggests that seven dimensions capture the essence of an organization’s
culture.
10
These dimensions are described in Exhibit 2-2. Each dimension ranges fromlow (it’s not very typical of the culture) to high (it’s very typical of the culture). Describ-
ing an organization using these seven dimensions gives a composite picture of the
organization’s culture. In many organizations, one of these cultural dimensions often is
emphasized more than the others and essentially shapes the organization’s personality
and the way organizational members work. For instance, at Sony Corporation the focus
Exhibit 2-2
Dimensions of Organizational Culture
Organizational
Culture
OutcomeOrientation
Attention toDetail
PeopleOrientation
TeamOrientation
Aggressiveness
Stability
Innovation andRisk-Taking
Degree to whichemployees are aggressive
and competitive ratherthan cooperative
Degree to whichwork is organized
around teams ratherthan individuals
Degree to whichorganizational
decisions and actionsemphasize maintaining
the status quo
Degree to whichmanagement decisions
take into account theeffects on people in
the organization
Degree to whichemployees are
encouraged to beinnovative and
to take risks
Degree to whichmanagers focus on resultsor outcomes rather thanon how these outcomes
are achieved
Degree to whichemployees are expected
to exhibit precision,analysis, and attention
to detail
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
6/27
40 Part 1 DEFINING THE MANAGER’S TERRAIN
Exhibit 2-3
Contrasting Organizational Cultures
Organization A
R u l e s
This organization is a manufacturing firm. Managers are expected to fully document all
decisions, and “good managers” are those who can provide detailed data to supporttheir recommendations. Creative decisions that incur significant change or risk are notencouraged. Because managers of failed projects are openly criticized and penalized,managers try not to implement ideas that deviate much from the status quo. One lower-level manager quoted an often-used phrase in the company: “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”
Employees are required to follow extensive rules and regulations in this firm. Managerssupervise employees closely to ensure there are no deviations. Management is concernedwith high productivity, regardless of the impact on employee morale or turnover.
Work activities are designed around individuals. There are distinct departments andlines of authority, and employees are expected to minimize formal contact with otheremployees outside their functional area or line of command. Performance evaluations andrewards emphasize individual effort, although seniority tends to be the primary factor in thedetermination of pay raises and promotions.
Organization B
This organization is also a manufacturing firm. Here, however, management encouragesand rewards risk taking and change. Decisions based on intuition are valued as much asthose that are well rationalized. Management prides itself on its history of experimentingwith new technologies and its success in regularly introducing innovative products.Managers or employees who have a good idea are encouraged to “run with it,” and failuresare treated as “learning experiences.” The company prides itself on being market drivenand rapidly responsive to the changing needs of its customers.
There are few rules and regulations for employees to follow, and supervision isloose because management believes its employees are hardworking and trustworthy.Management is concerned with high productivity but believes this comes through treatingits people right. The company is proud of its reputation as a good place to work.
Job activities are designed around work teams, and team members are encouraged tointeract with people across functions and authority levels. Employees talk positively aboutthe competition between teams. Individuals and teams have goals, and bonuses are basedon achievement of outcomes. Employees are given considerable autonomy in choosing themeans by which the goals are attained.
is on product innovation. The company “lives and breathes” new-product development
(outcome orientation), and employees’ work decisions, behaviours, and actions support
that goal. In contrast, WestJet Airlines has made its employees a central part of its culture
(people orientation). Exhibit 2-3 describes how the dimensions can be combined to
create significantly different organizations.
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
7/27
Chapter 2 Organizational Culture and the Organizational Environment 41
Strong Cultures
All organizations have cultures, but not all cultures equally influence employees’ behav-iours and actions. Strong cultures —those in which the key values are deeply held and
widely shared—have a greater influence on employees than weaker cultures. (Exhibit 2-4
contrasts strong and weak cultures.) At 3M, the 15 percent rule and the 30 percent rule
make the cultural commitment to innovation crystal clear. Yet some organizations do not
make clear what is important and what is not, and this lack of clarity is a characteristic
of weak cultures. In such organizations, culture is unlikely to greatly influence managers.
Most organizations, however, have moderate to strong cultures. There is relatively high
agreement on what is important, what defines “good” employee behaviour, what it takes
to get ahead, and so forth.
The more employees accept the organization’s key values and the greater their com-
mitment to those values, the stronger the culture. Most organizations have moderate to
strong cultures, that is, there is relatively high agreement on what’s important, what defines
“good” employee behaviour, what it takes to get ahead, and so forth. The stronger a culture
becomes, the more it affects the way managers plan, organize, lead, and control.11
Why is having a strong culture important? For one thing, in organizations with strong
cultures, employees are more loyal than employees in organizations with weak cultures.12
Research also suggests that strong cultures are associated with high organizational perfor-
mance, and it’s easy to understand why.13 After all, if values are clear and widely accepted,
employees know what they’re supposed to do and what’s expected of them, so they can act
quickly to take care of problems. However, the drawback is that a strong culture also might
prevent employees from trying new approaches, especially when conditions change rapidly.14
SubculturesOrganizations do not necessarily have one uniform culture. In fact, most large organiza-
tions have a dominant culture and numerous sets of subcultures.15
When we talk about an organization’s culture, we are referring to its dominant culture.
A dominant culture expresses the core values that are shared by the majority of an orga-
nization’s members. It’s this macro view of culture that gives an organization its distinct
personality.16 Subcultures tend to develop in large organizations to reflect the common
problems, situations, or experiences that members face. The existence of subcultures in an
organization suggests that individual managers play a role in moulding a common culture
in their own units. By conveying and then reinforcing core values, managers can influence
the common culture of the employees in their unit.
Subcultures are likely to be defined by department designations and geographical
separation. An organization’s marketing department, for example, can have a subculture
strong cultures Organizational
cultures in which the key values are
intensely held and widely shared.
Simulate on MyManagementLab
Organizational Structure
dominant culture A system of
shared meanings that expresses
the core values of a majority of
the organization’s members; it
gives the organization its distinct
personality.
subcultures Minicultures within
an organization, typically defined
by department designations and
geographical separation.
Exhibit 2-4
Strong versus Weak Cultures
Strong Cultures Weak Cultures
Values widely shared Values limited to a few people—usuallytop management
Culture conveys consistent messagesabout what’s important
Culture sends contradictory messagesabout what’s important
Most employees can tell stories aboutcompany history or heroes
Employees have little knowledge ofcompany history or heroes
Employees strongly identify with culture Employees have little identificationwith culture
Strong connection between sharedvalues and behaviours
Little connection between shared valuesand behaviours
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
8/27
42 Part 1 DEFINING THE MANAGER’S TERRAIN
that is uniquely shared by members of that department. It will include the core values of
the dominant culture, plus additional values unique to members of the marketing depart-
ment. Similarly, offices or units of the organization that are physically separated from the
organization’s main operations may take on a different personality. Again, the core values
are essentially retained but modified to reflect the separated unit’s distinct situation.
Where Culture Comes From and How It Continues
Exhibit 2-5 illustrates how an organization’s culture is established and maintained. The
original source of an organization’s culture usually reflects the vision or mission of the
organization’s founders. They are not constrained by previous customs or approaches. And
the small size of most new organizations helps the founders instill their vision in all orga-
nizational members. Frank Stronach had a strong impact on the culture of the organization
he founded, Magna International. Stronach still has a profound effect on Magna’s culture,
even though he is no longer CEO.17 Magna’s Corporate Constitution and the Employee’s
Charter provide the roadmap for the company’s Fair Enterprise culture, first introduced by
Stronach. Stronach’s policies of profit-sharing and empowerment have created a workforcethat has made Magna one of the largest and most profitable companies in the country.
Once the culture is in place, however, certain organizational practices help maintain
it. For instance, during the employee selection process, managers typically judge job can-
didates not only on the job requirements, but also on how well they might fit into the
organization. At the same time, job candidates find out information about the organiza-
tion and determine whether they are comfortable with what they see.
The actions of top managers also have a major impact on the organization’s culture. For
instance, at Best Buy, the company’s chief marketing officer would take groups of employees
for “regular tours of what the company called its retail hospital.” Wearing white lab coats,
employees would walk into a room with a row of real hospital beds and patient charts
describing the ills affecting each of the company’s major competitors. As each of those com-
petitors “succumbed to terminal illness” and was no longer in business, the room wouldbe darkened. Just think of the powerful message such a display would have on employees
and their work.18 Through what they say and how they behave, top managers establish
norms that filter down through the organization and can have a positive effect on employ-
ees’ behaviours. For instance, former IBM CEO Sam Palmisano wanted employees to value
teamwork, so he chose to take several million dollars from his yearly bonus and give it to
his top executives based on their teamwork. He said, “If you say you’re about a team, you
have to be a team. You’ve got to walk the talk, right?”19 However, as we’ve seen in numerous
corporate ethics scandals, the actions of top managers also can lead to undesirable outcomes.
Finally, organizations help employees adapt to the culture through socialization , a pro-
cess that helps new employees learn the organization’s way of doing things. For instance,
new employees at Starbucks stores go through 24 hours of intensive training that helps
turn them into brewing consultants (baristas). They learn company philosophy, company
core values The primary, or
dominant, values that are accepted
throughout the organization.
socialization The process that
helps employees adapt to the
organization’s culture.
Exhibit 2-5
How an Organization’s Culture Is Established and Maintained
Organization's
Culture
Selection
Criteria
Socialization
Top Management
Philosophy of
Organization's Founders
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
9/27
Chapter 2 Organizational Culture and the Organizational Environment 43
jargon, and even how to assist customers with decisions about beans, grind, and espresso
machines. One benefit of socialization is that employees understand the culture and are
enthusiastic and knowledgeable with customers.20 Another benefit is that it minimizes
the chance that new employees who are unfamiliar with the organization’s culture might
disrupt current beliefs and customs.
How Employees Learn Culture
Employees “learn” an organization’s culture in a number of ways. The most common arestories, rituals, material symbols, and language.
Stories
Organizational “stories” typically contain a narrative of significant events or people, includ-
ing such things as the organization’s founders, rule breaking, reactions to past mistakes, and
so forth.21 Managers at Southwest Airlines tell stories celebrating employees who perform
heroically for customers.22 Such stories help convey what’s important and provide examples
that people can learn from. At 3M Company, the product innovation stories are legendary.
There’s the story about the 3M scientist who spilled chemicals on her tennis shoe and came
up with Scotchgard. Then, there’s the story about Art Fry, a 3M researcher, who wanted a
better way to mark the pages of his church hym-
nal and invented the Post-It Note. These storiesreflect what made 3M great and what it will take
to continue that success.23 To help employees
learn the culture, organizational stories anchor
the present in the past, provide explanations and
legitimacy for current practices, exemplify what
is important to the organization, and provide
compelling pictures of an organization’s goals.24
Rituals
In the early days of Facebook, founder Mark
Zuckerberg had an artist paint a mural at com-
pany headquarters showing children takingover the world with laptops. Also, he would
end employee meetings by pumping his fist
in the air and leading employees in a chant of
“domination.” Although the cheering ritual was
intended to be something simply fun, other
company executives suggested he drop it because it made him seem silly, and they feared
that competitors might cite it as evidence of monopolistic goals.25 That’s the power that
rituals can have in shaping what employees believe is important. Corporate rituals are
repetitive sequences of activities that express and reinforce the important values and goals
of the organization. One of the best-known corporate rituals is Mary Kay Cosmetics’ annual
awards ceremony for its sales representatives. The company spends more than $50 million
annually on rewards and prize incentives. Looking like a cross between a circus and a Miss America pageant, the ceremony takes place in a large auditorium, on a stage in front of a
large, cheering audience, with all the participants dressed in glamorous evening clothes.
Salespeople are rewarded for sales goal achievements with an array of expensive gifts,
including big-screen televisions, diamond rings, trips, and pink Cadillacs. This “show” acts
as a motivator by publicly acknowledging outstanding sales performance. In addition, the
ritual aspect reinforces late founder Mary Kay’s determination and optimism, which enabled
her to overcome personal hardships, start her own company, and achieve material success.
It conveys to her salespeople that reaching their sales goals is important and through hard
work and encouragement, they too can achieve success. The contagious enthusiasm and
excitement of Mary Kay sales representatives make it obvious that this annual “ritual” plays
a significant role in establishing desired levels of motivation and behavioural expectations,
which is, after all, what management hopes an organization’s culture does.
German automaker BMW helps
employees learn its company’s
culture by repeating the “story of
1959.” New employees learn that
1959 was a pivotal year for BMW
because it almost went bankrupt
after badly misjudging the market
by producing a large expensive
car few people could afford and a
tiny two-seater that was too small
to be practical. Managementdevised a turnaround plan for
BMW that focused on produc-
ing a new class of sporty sedans
and made a pact with employ-
ees that would help keep the
company afloat. The “story of
1959” reflects the importance
of employees in turning around
BMW and steering it on the road
to success. This photo shows
BMW employees signing a new
car model they helped produce,
signifying the powerful role they
continue to play in the company’s
performance.
Andreas Gebert/EPA/Newscom
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
10/27
44 Part 1 DEFINING THE MANAGER’S TERRAIN
Material Artifacts and Symbols When you walk into different businesses, do you get a “feel” for what type of work environ-
ment it is—formal, casual, fun, serious, and so forth? These reactions demonstrate the power
of material symbols or artifacts in creating an organization’s personality.26 The layout of an
organization’s facilities, how employees dress, the types of automobiles provided to top
executives, and the availability of corporate aircraft are examples of material symbols. Oth-
ers include the size of offices, the elegance of furnishings, executive “perks” (extra benefits
provided to managers such as health club memberships, use of company-owned facilities,
and so forth), employee fitness centres or on-site dining facilities, and reserved parking spaces
for certain employees. At WorldNow, a business that helps local media companies develop
new online distribution channels and revenue streams, an important material symbol is an
old dented drill that the founders purchased for $2 at a thrift store. The drill symbolizes the
company’s culture of “drilling down to solve problems.” When an employee is presented
with the drill in recognition of outstanding work, he or she is expected to personalize the
drill in some way and devise a new rule for caring for it. One employee installed a Bart Simp-
son trigger; another made the drill wireless by adding an antenna. The company’s “icon”
carries on the culture even as the organization evolves and changes.27
Material symbols convey to employees who is important and the kinds of behaviour(for example, risk taking, conservative, authoritarian, participative, individualistic, and so
forth) that are expected and appropriate.
LanguageMany organizations and units within organizations use language as a way to identify and
unite members of a culture. By learning this language, members attest to their acceptance
of the culture and their willingness to help preserve it. For instance, at Cranium, a Seattle
board game company, “chiff” is used to remind employees of the need to be incessantly
innovative in everything they do. “Chiff” stands for “clever, high-quality, innovative,
friendly, fun.”28 At Build-A-Bear Workshop stores, employees are encouraged to use a sales
technique called “Strive for Five,” in which they work to sell each customer five items. The
simple rhyming slogan is a powerful tool to drive sales.29
Over time, organizations often develop unique terms to describe equipment, key per-
sonnel, suppliers, customers, processes, or products related to its business. New employees
are frequently overwhelmed with acronyms and jargon that, after a short period of time,
become a natural part of their language. Once learned, this language acts as a common
denominator that bonds members.
How Culture Affects ManagersBecause an organization’s cultural norms define what its employees can and cannot do, they
are particularly relevant to managers even though they are rarely explicitly stated or writ-
ten down. It’s unlikely that they will even be spoken. But they are there, and all managers
quickly learn what to do and what not to do in their organization. For instance, you will not
find the following values written down anywhere, but each comes from a real organization.
One area where organizational
culture influences employee
behaviour is how employees
dress for work. Look at what each
of these four individuals is wear-
ing. At what kinds of organiza-
tions do you think each of these
styles is appropriate work wear?
What do you think the cultures
might be like at the organizations
where each person works?
Lisa F. Young/Shutterstock markos86/Shutterstock Brian Mueller/ShutterstockKen Hurst/Shutterstock
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
11/27
Chapter 2 Organizational Culture and the Organizational Environment 45
● Look busy even if you are not.
● If you take risks and fail around here, you will pay dearly for it.
● Before you make a decision, run it by your manager so that he or she is never surprised.
● We make our product only as good as the competition forces us to.
● What made us successful in the past will make us successful in the future.
● If you want to get to the top here, you have to be a team player.
The link between values such as these and managerial behaviour is fairly straightforward.
If an organization’s culture supports the belief that profits can be increased by cost cutting
and that the company’s best interests are served by achieving slow but steady increases in
quarterly earnings, managers are unlikely to pursue programs that are innovative, risky,
long term, or expansionary. For organizations that value and encourage workforce diversity,
the organizational culture, and thus managers’ decisions and actions, will be supportive of
diversity efforts. In an organization whose culture conveys a basic distrust of employees,
managers are more likely to use an authoritarian leadership style than a democratic one.
Why? The culture establishes for managers what is appropriate behaviour.
Current Organizational Culture IssuesFacing Managers
3M has consistently ranked in the top five of the Global Innovation 1000 survey yet does
not rank in the top 20 R&D spenders. How is this possible? The explanation is in the way 3M uses
culture to support a “winning overall business strategy, deep customer insight, great talent and
the right set of capabilities to achieve successful execution.” In the study, culture was defined as
the organization’s “self-sustaining patterns of behaving, feeling, thinking and believing.” The study
pointed out that organizations with unsupportive cultures and poor strategic alignment significantly
underperform their competitors.
Think About It
3M has been strategic in building a sustaining innovative culture over the long term. What
were some of the steps they took? Could similar steps be taken to support an ethical culture?
A customer responsive culture? A culture that supports diversity? An inclusive workplace
culture?
Calgary-based WestJet Airlines is renowned for its attention to customers. Nike’s inno-
vations in running-shoe technology are legendary. Royal Bank (RBC Financial Group)
consistently takes top honours for corporate responsibility and citizenship. How have
these organizations achieved such reputations? Their organizational cultures have played
a crucial role. Let’s look at four current cultural issues managers should consider: creating
an ethical culture, creating an innovative culture, creating a customer-responsive culture,
and creating a culture that supports diversity.
Creating an Ethical Culture The content and strength of an organization’s culture influences its ethical climate and
the ethical behaviour of its members.31 A strong organizational culture will exert more
influence on employees than a weak one. If the culture is strong and supports high ethical
standards, it should have a very powerful and positive influence on employee behaviour.
Likewise, a strong culture that encourages unethical behaviour will have a powerful influ-
ence on employees, as the following Management Reflection shows.
❸ Describe what kinds ofcultures managers cancreate.
datapoints 30
43 percent of workers
surveyed would not
recommend a job at their
workplace to a friend or family
member.
70 percent of largecompanies are likely to
begin using digital-game–like
reward and competitive tactics
to motivate employee perfor-
mance and encourage friendly
competition.
61 percent of employees
surveyed in Great
Britain felt their boss was
unapproachable.
8percent of executives
surveyed said fostering a
shared understanding of values
was an important capability.
32 percent of workers
surveyed said accli-
mating to a different corporate
culture could pose the greatest
challenge when reentering the
workforce.
67 percent of men surveyed
never wear a tie to work.
45 percent of employees
surveyed said their
companies’ ability to innovate
was below average when it
came to moving quickly from
generating ideas to selling
products.
45 percent of senior
managers surveyed said
their company’s culture is clear
about what motivates employees.
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
12/27
46 Part 1 DEFINING THE MANAGER’S TERRAIN
An organizational culture most likely to shape high ethical standards is one that is
high in risk tolerance, low to moderate in aggressiveness, and focused on means as well
as outcomes. Managers in such a culture are supported for taking risks and innovating,
are discouraged from engaging in uncontrolled competition, and will pay attention to
how goals are achieved as well as to what goals are achieved (as in the Patagonia example).
Creating an Innovative Culture You may not recognize IDEO’s name, but you’ve probably used a number of its products.
As a product design firm, it takes the ideas that corporations bring to it and turns them into
reality. Some of its creations range from the first commercial mouse (for Apple Computer)
to the first stand-up toothpaste tube (for Procter & Gamble) to the handheld personal
organizer (for Palm). It’s critical that IDEO’s culture support creativity and innovation.33
IDEO has won more BusinessWeek /DSA Industrial Design Excellence awards than any otherfirm. It also has been ranked by BusinessWeek in the top 25 most innovative companies and
does consulting work for the other 24.34 The company’s emphasis is on simplicity, func-
tion, and meeting user needs. IDEO believes that the best ideas for creating or improving
products or processes come from keen observation of how users work and play on a daily
Let My People Go Surfing
Can a manager encourage individuals to act responsibly? Canadian-born Yvon
Chouinard founded the clothing company Patagonia forty years ago. He and his wife are
sole owners of Patagonia, a privately held company that brought in $414 million in sales
in fiscal 2011 and projected a 30 percent increase in sales for this year. His flex-time poli-cies allow workers to come and go whenever they want—say, when waves are high at the
nearby surf point—as long as deadlines are met. There’s a yoga room available any time
of day (I walked in on the head menswear designer meditating there at around 11 a.m.
on a Tuesday.) At the prodding of Chouinard’s wife, Malinda, Patagonia was one of the
first companies in California to provide on-site, subsidized day care. Even the chief bean
counter, COO and CFO Rose Marcario, seems ethcially fulfilled. In previous jobs at other
companies, she says, “I might have looked for ways to defer taxes in the Cayman Islands.
Here, we are proud to pay our fair share of taxes. It’s a different philosophy. My life is more
integrated with my work because I’m trying to stay true to the same values in both.” 32 ■
MANAGEMENT REFLECTION FOCUS ON ETHICS
As we saw in Chapter 1,
organizational culture is what
makes Cirque du Soleil so
special. Employees focus on
solutions rather than blame.
Consensus is not a virtue
because CEO Daniel Lamarre
feels that the best ideas get lostif everyone has to compromise.
Lamarre encourages dissent, and
tempers fly during discussions,
but the results are the creative,
dynamic shows that the Cirque
produces.
Ian Rutherford/ZUMA Press/Newscom
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
13/27
Chapter 2 Organizational Culture and the Organizational Environment 47
basis.35 Another innovative organization is Cirque du Soleil, the Montreal-based creator
of circus theatre. Its managers state that the culture is based on involvement, communica-
tion, creativity, and diversity, which they see as keys to innovation.36
Although these two companies are in industries in which innovation is important
(product design and entertainment), the fact is that any successful organization needs
a culture that supports innovation. How important is culture to innovation? In a recent
survey of senior executives, more than half said that the most important driver of innova-
tion for companies was a supportive corporate culture.37
What does an innovative culture look like? According to Swedish researcher Goran
Ekvall, it is characterized by the following:
● Challenge and involvement —Are employees involved in, motivated by, and
committed to long-term goals and success of the organization?
● Freedom —Can employees independently define their work, exercise discretion,
and take initiative in their day-to-day activities?
● Trust and openness —Are employees supportive and respectful to each other?
● Idea time —Do individuals have time to elaborate on new ideas before taking action?
● Playfulness/humour —Is the workplace spontaneous and fun?
● Conflict resolution —Do individuals make decisions and resolve issues
based on the good of the organization rather than personal interest?
● Debates —Are employees allowed to express opinions and put forth ideas
for consideration and review?
● Risk taking —Do managers tolerate uncertainty and ambiguity, and are
employees rewarded for taking risks?38
Creating a Customer-Responsive CultureIsadore Sharp, chair and CEO of Toronto-based Four Seasons Hotels and
Resorts, believes keenly in customer service. Creating a customer-responsive
culture starts with employee selection: every candidate faces four or five inter- views to ensure they have the right attitude. As part of employee training, all
new employees spend one night in the hotel as a guest to help them understand
the perspective of the customer. Sharp notes that the hotel chain has “30 000
employees who are always thinking of new ways to make our guest experience
more rewarding.”39
Harrah’s Entertainment, the Las Vegas–based national gaming company, is
also devoted to customer service, and for good reason. Company research showed
that customers who were satisfied with the service they received at a Harrah’s
casino increased their gaming expenditures by 10 percent, and those who were
extremely satisfied increased their gaming expenditures by 24 percent. When
customer service translates into these types of results, of course managers would want to
create a customer-responsive culture!40 But what does a customer-responsive culture look like? Research shows that six charac-
teristics are routinely present in successful service-oriented organizations:
● Outgoing and friendly employees. Successful service-oriented organizations hire
employees who are outgoing and friendly.
● Few rigid rules, procedures, and regulations. Service employees need to have the
freedom to meet changing customer service requirements.
● Widespread use of empowerment. Employees are empowered to decide what is
necessary to please the customer.
● Good listening skills. Employees in customer-responsive cultures have the ability to
listen to and understand messages sent by the customer.
This jubilant customer jumps for
joy to celebrate his purchase of
an iPad tablet on the first day of
its release at an Apple retail storein London. By creating an innova-
tive and customer-responsive
culture, Apple has achieved
financial success and earned
high customer satisfaction ratings
and brand loyalty for its products
and services. This culture fosters
employee creativity, commit-
ment to company goals, trust
and openness, and risk taking. It
involves hiring friendly and helpful
employees and empowering them
to make decisions about their
jobs and what they can do to
satisfy and delight customers.
Carl Court/AFP/Getty Images/Newscom
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
14/27
48 Part 1 DEFINING THE MANAGER’S TERRAIN
● Role clarity. Service employees act as links between the organization and its
customers, which can create considerable ambiguity and conflict. Successful
customer-responsive cultures reduce employees’ uncertainty about their roles
and the best way to perform their jobs.
● Employees attentive to customer needs. They are willing to take the initiative, even
when it’s outside their normal job requirements, to satisfy a customer’s needs.41
In general, to create any type of culture (and to reinforce the culture), managers need
to communicate the elements of the culture, model the appropriate behaviours, train
employees to carry out the new actions, and reward desired behaviours while creating
negative incentives for straying from the desired behaviour.42
Creating a Culture That Supports Diversity Today’s organizations are characterized by workforce diversity , the mix of people in
organizations in terms of gender, race, ethnicity, age, and other characteristics that reflect
differences. Managers must look long and hard at their culture to see whether the shared
meaning and beliefs that were appropriate for a more homogeneous workforce will accept
and promote diverse views. Although organizations in the past may have supported
diversity to meet federal hiring requirements, organizations today recognize that diversity-
supportive cultures are good for business. Among other things, diversity contributes tomore creative solutions and enhances employee morale. But how can such a culture be
encouraged? The following Management Reflection discusses what managers can do.
workforce diversity The mix of
people in organizations in terms of
gender, race, ethnicity, age, and
other characteristics that reflect
differences.
Creating an Inclusive Workplace Culture
How can managers create a culture that allows diversity to flourish? Creating a
workplace culture that supports and encourages the inclusion of diverse individuals and
views is a major organizational effort.43
There are two things managers can do. First,managers must show that they value diversity through their decisions and actions. As they
plan, organize, lead, and control, they need to recognize and embrace diverse perspectives.
For instance, at the Marriott Marquis Hotel in New York’s Times Square, managers take
required diversity-training classes, where they learn that the best way to cope with diver-
sity-related conflict is by focusing on performance and not defining problems in terms
of gender, culture, race, or disability. At Prudential, the annual planning process includes
key diversity performance goals that are measured and tied to managers’ compensation.
The second thing managers can do is look for ways to reinforce employee behaviours that
exemplify inclusiveness. Some suggestions include encouraging individuals to value and
defend diverse views, creating traditions and ceremonies that celebrate diversity, reward-
ing “heroes” and “heroines” who accept and promote inclusiveness, and communicating
formally and informally about employees who champion diversity issues. ■
MANAGEMENT REFLECTION
The Organizational Environment
During the American stock market crash of 1929, the Dow Jones average fell by
54.7 percent.44 Between October 11, 2007, and March 2, 2009, the market declined 50.2 percent!
In the midst of the widespread market chaos during the recent market downturn, 3M reacted by
aggressively managing costs and cash, as well as putting in place tighter operational discipline. In
the fourth quarter of 2008, more than 2400 jobs were eliminated. Factory workers were temporarily
laid off until production volumes returned to normal levels, pay raises were deferred in 2009, the
policy of banking vacations was eliminated, and capital expenditures were cut back by 30 percent.45
❹ Describe the featuresof the specific andgeneral organizationalenvironments.
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
15/27
Chapter 2 Organizational Culture and the Organizational Environment 49
Think About It
The financial collapse fuelled by the subprime mortgage crisis evolved quickly and soon became
global. If you were a manager at 3M, could you have prepared for this eventuality?
In the Management History module, our discussion of an organization as an open system
explained that an organization interacts with its environment as it takes in inputs and dis-
tributes outputs. Digital technology has disrupted all types of industries—from financial
services to recorded music. One industry in particular, the publishing industry, has been
impacted significantly. As e-book sales skyrocketed, competition among e-book reader
devices intensified. Amazon introduced the first device, the Kindle, in November 2007. As
with any new product, customers had to adjust to the new technology, but once they did,
the Kindles were on fire! Two years later, retailer Barnes & Noble introduced the Nook, a
cheaper e-book device. Amazon responded by cutting the price of its cheapest Kindle. Three
months later in January 2010, Apple introduced its iPad tablet. It was more expensive, but
its functionality and options (and the Apple name) made it an instant hit with customers.
In response, Barnes & Noble cut the price of its Nook, and Amazon again lowered the price
of the Kindle. By September 2011, the basic Kindle’s starting price had dropped to $79,and Amazon launched Kindle Fire. Then in November 2011, Barnes & Noble joined the
tablet battle with its $249 Nook Tablet. And now Microsoft has invested $300 million in
Barnes & Noble (which had been struggling) in an attempt to be more competitive with
Amazon. In addition, Toronto-based Kobo Inc has recently gained international attention
for doubling its readership in 2013 and capturing 3% of the American e-reader market.
Since 2009, Kobo has managed to capture dominant positions in Canada and Japan, and
has expanded its selection to include attractive low-cost alternatives. As the popularity of
e-books accelerates, the “reader wars” are likely to continue.46 Anyone who doubts the
impact the external environment has on managing just needs to look at what’s happened
in both the publishing industry and the e-book reader industry during the last few years.
Defining the External Environment The term external environment refers to forces and institutions outside the organiza-
tion that potentially can affect the organization’s performance. The external environment
is made up of three components, as shown in Exhibit 2-6: the specific environment, the
general environment, and the global environment. We discuss the first two types of exter-
nal environment in this chapter. Today, globalization is one of the major factors affecting
managers of both large and small organizations. We address the global environment in
Chapter 3.
The Specific Environment The specific environment includes those external forces that have a direct and immediate
impact on managers’ decisions and actions and are directly relevant to the achievement ofthe organization’s goals. Each organization’s specific environment is unique and changes
with conditions. For instance, Timex and Rolex both make watches, but their specific
environments differ because they operate in distinctly different market niches. What forces
make up the specific environment? The main ones are customers, suppliers, competitors,
and pressure groups.
Customers Organizations exist to meet the needs of customers. It’s the customer or
client who consumes or uses the organization’s output. This is true even for government
organizations and other not-for-profits.
Customers obviously represent potential uncertainty to an organization. Their tastes
can change or they can become dissatisfied with the organization’s products or service.
Of course, some organizations face considerably more uncertainty as a result of their
external environment Outside
forces and institutions that
potentially can affect the
organization’s performance.
specific environment The part
of the external environment that isdirectly relevant to the achievement
of an organization’s goals.
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
16/27
50 Part 1 DEFINING THE MANAGER’S TERRAIN
customers than do others. For example, what comes to mind when you think of Club
Med? Club Med’s image was traditionally one of carefree singles having fun in the sun
at exotic locales. Club Med found, however, that as its target customers married and had
children, these same individuals were looking for family-oriented vacation resorts where
they could bring the kids. Although Club Med responded to the changing demands of its
customers by offering different types of vacation experiences, including family-oriented
ones, the company found it hard to change its image.
Suppliers When you think of an organization’s suppliers, you typically think in terms of
organizations that provide materials and equipment. For Canada’s Wonderland, just out-
side of Toronto, that includes organizations that sell soft drinks, computers, food, flowers
and other nursery stock, concrete, and paper products. But the term suppliers also includes
T H E S P ECIF I C E N V I R O N M
E N T
PublicPressureGroups
Suppliers
Competitors Customers
THE
ORGANIZATION
T H E G
L O BAL ENV I R O N M E N T
T H E G
E N E RAL EN V I R O N M
E N T
E c o n o m i
c
E c o n o m i c
D e m o g
r a p h
i c
T e c h nologica l
G l o b
a l T r a d e
S o c i o
- c
u l t
u r a l
C u l t u
r a l
L e g
a l – P o
l
i
t i c a l
L e g
a l – P o l i t i c a l
Exhibit 2-6
The External Environment
When the internet search engine
Google decided to accept heavy
censorship of its Chinese site
in compliance with Communist
Party requirements, its found-
ers said the widely criticized
compromise was made to allow
internet access to a fifth of the
world’s population. Among those
who disagreed with Google’s
compromise were these members
of Students for a Free Tibet. In
March of 2010 Google reconsid-
ered its decision and withdrew
its services from mainland China
in protest of the self-censorship
required as the price of doing
business in China. 47
Dino Vournas/AP Photos
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
17/27
Chapter 2 Organizational Culture and the Organizational Environment 51
providers of financial and labour inputs. Shareholders, banks, insurance companies, pen-
sion funds, and other similar organizations are needed to ensure a continuous supply of
money. Labour unions, colleges and universities, occupational associations, trade schools,
and local labour markets are sources of employees. When the sources of employees dry
up, it can impact managers’ decisions and actions. For example, a lack of qualified nurses,
a serious problem plaguing the health care industry, is making it difficult for health care
providers to meet demand and keep service levels high.
Competitors All organizations have one or more competitors. Even though it is a
monopoly, Canada Post competes with FedEx, UPS, and other forms of communication
such as the telephone, email, and fax. Nike competes with Reebok, Adidas, and Fila, among
others. Coca-Cola competes with Pepsi and other soft drink companies. Not-for-profit
organizations such as the Royal Ontario Museum and Girl Guides also compete for dollars,
volunteers, and customers. One competitor that many managers ignore when launching
new products or services is the status quo—customers tend to keep doing what they have
always done unless there is a compelling reason to try something new. With this in mind,
some would suggest that entering a new market with a new product is infinitely more risky
than entering an established market where you find a compelling way to fulfill a need not
served by your competitors.
Public Pressure Groups Managers must recognize the special-interest groups that attempt
to influence the actions of organizations. For instance, both Walmart and Home Depot
have had difficulty getting approval to build stores in Vancouver. Neighbourhood activists
worry about traffic density brought about by big-box stores, and in the case of both stores
there is concern that local businesses will fail if the stores move in. Home Depot’s direc-
tor of real estate called Vancouver City Hall’s review process “confusing and unfair” and
“unlike anything in [his] experience.”48 Local hardware store owners and resident groups
have lobbied against the store to city planners, hoping to keep big-box stores out of the
Kitsilano neighbourhood. Though Walmart eventually succeeded in entering the Vancouver
market, in nearby Richmond, public pressure delayed Walmart’s entry by almost 10 years.
As social and political attitudes change, so too does the power of public pressure groups.
For example, through their persistent efforts, groups such as MADD (Mothers AgainstDrunk Driving) and SADD (Students Against Destructive Decisions) have managed to
make changes in the alcoholic beverage and restaurant and bar industries, and have raised
public awareness about the problem of drunk drivers.
The General Environment The general environment includes the broad economic, legal–political, socio-cultural,
demographic, and technological conditions that may affect the organization. Changes in
any of these areas usually do not have as large an impact as changes in the specific envi-
ronment do, but managers must consider them as they plan, organize, lead, and control.
Economic Conditions Interest rates, inflation, changes in disposable income, stock
market fluctuations, and the stage of the general business cycle are some of the economicfactors that can affect management practices in an organization. For example, many spe-
cialty retailers such as IKEA, Roots, Birks, and Williams-Sonoma are acutely aware of the
impact consumer disposable income has on their sales. When consumers’ incomes fall or
when their confidence about job security declines, as happened following the subprime
mortgage crisis in 2008, they will postpone purchasing anything that isn’t a necessity. Even
charitable organizations such as the United Way or the Heart and Stroke Foundation feel
the impact of economic factors. During economic downturns, not only does the demand
for their services increase, but also their contributions typically decrease.
Legal–Political Conditions Federal, provincial, and local governments influence what
organizations can and cannot do. Some federal legislation has significant implications. For
example, the Canadian Human Rights Act makes it illegal for any employer or provider of
general environment Broad
external conditions that may affect
the organization.
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
18/27
52 Part 1 DEFINING THE MANAGER’S TERRAIN
service that falls within federal jurisdiction to discriminate on the following grounds: race,
national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex (including pregnancy and childbirth),
marital status, family status, mental or physical disability (including previous or present
drug or alcohol dependence), pardoned conviction, or sexual orientation. The act covers
federal departments and agencies; Crown corporations; chartered banks; national airlines;
interprovincial communications and telephone companies; interprovincial transportation
companies; and other federally regulated industries, including certain mining operations.
Canada’s Employment Equity Act of 1995 protects several categories of employees with
employment barriers: Aboriginal peoples (whether First Nation, Inuit, or Métis); persons
with disabilities; members of visible minorities (non-Caucasian in race or non-white in
colour); and women. This legislation aims to ensure that members of these four groups are
treated equitably. Employers covered by the Canadian Human Rights Act are also covered
by the Employment Equity Act.
Many provinces have their own legislation, including employment equity acts, to cover
employers in their provinces. Companies sometimes have difficulty complying with equity
acts, as recent audits conducted by the Canadian Human Rights Commission show. In an
audit of 180 companies, only Status of Women Canada; Elliot Lake, Ontario-based AJ Bus
Lines; the National Parole Board; Canadian Transportation Agency; Les Méchins, Quebec-
based Verreault Navigation; and Nortel Networks were compliant on their first try.49
The Competition Act of 1986 created the Bureau of Competition Policy (now called theCompetition Bureau) to maintain and encourage competition in Canada. For example,
if two major competing companies consider merging, they come under scrutiny from the
bureau.
To protect farmers, the Canadian government has created marketing boards that regulate
the pricing and production of such things as milk and eggs. Those who decide that they
want to manufacture small amounts of cheese in Canada would have great difficulty doing
so because the Canadian government does not open production quotas to new producers
very often. Marketing boards restrict imports of some products, but the unintended result
is that foreign governments oppose exports from Canada.
Organizations spend a great deal of time and money meeting government regulations,
but the effects of these regulations go beyond time and money.50 They also reduce mana-
gerial discretion by limiting the choices available to managers. In a 2004 COMPAS surveyof business leaders, most respondents cited interprovincial trade barriers as a significant
hurdle to doing business in this country, calling the barriers “bad economics.”51 An article
published in May 2007 backed up the views of these Canadian business leaders, arguing
that nearly half of the productivity advantage that the United States has over Canada could
be accounted for by interprovincial trade barriers.52
Other aspects of the legal–political conditions are the political climate, the general
stability of a country where an organization operates, and the attitudes that elected govern-
ment officials hold toward business. This is discussed in more detail in Chapter 3.
Socio-Cultural Conditions
A recent Harris Interactive Poll found that only 10 percent of adults think economic
inequality is “not a problem at all.” Most survey respondents believed it is either a majorproblem (57 percent) or a minor problem (23 percent).53 Perhaps you saw news stories
during late 2011 about a grassroots movement of protesters (Occupy) that started on Wall
Street and soon spread to other cities in United States, Canada, and around the world.
These protests focused on social and economic inequality, greed, corruption, and the
undue influence of corporations on government. The protestors’ slogan, We are the 99%,
referred to the growing income and wealth gap between the wealthiest 1 percent and the
rest of the population. Why has this issue become so sensitive? After all, those who worked
hard and were rewarded because of their hard work or innovativeness have long been
admired. And an income gap has always existed. In the North America, that gap between
the rich and the rest has been much wider than in other developed nations for decades and
is now becoming part of the dialogue that politicians and policy makers are speaking to as
exemplified by the Occupy Wall Street movement.54 As economic growth has languished
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
19/27
Chapter 2 Organizational Culture and the Organizational Environment 53
and sputtered, and as people’s belief that anyone could
grab hold of an opportunity and have a decent shot at pros-
perity has wavered, social discontent over growing income
gaps has increased. The bottom line is that business leaders
need to recognize how societal attitudes in the economic
context also may create constraints as they make decisions
and manage their businesses.55
Demographic Conditions “You can’t understand the
future without demographics. The composition of a society
… shapes every aspect of civic life, from politics, econom-
ics, and culture to the kinds of products, services, and busi-
nesses that are likely to succeed or fail. Demographics isn’t
destiny, but it’s close.”56 This quote should make it obvious
why it’s important to examine demographics.
Baby Boomers. Gen Y. Post-Millennials. Maybe you’ve heard or seen these terms
before. Population researchers use these terms to refer to three of the more well-known
age groups found in the North American population. Baby Boomers are those individuals
born between 1946 and 1964. Much is written and reported about “boomers” because
there are so many of them. The sheer number of people in that cohort means they’ve sig-nificantly affected every aspect of the external environment (from the educational system
to entertainment/lifestyle choices to the Social Security system and so forth) as they cycle
through the various life stages.
Gen Y (or the “Millennials”) is typically considered to encompass those individuals
born between 1978 and 1994. As the children of the Baby Boomers, this age group is
also large in number and making its imprint on external environmental conditions as
well. From technology to clothing styles to work attitudes, Gen Y is making its imprint
on workplaces.
Then, we have the Post-Millennials—the youngest identified age group— those born
between the late 1990s and 2005.57 This group has also been called the iGeneration,
primarily because they’ve grown up with technology that customizes everything to the
individual. Population experts say it’s too early to tell whether elementary school-agedchildren and younger are part of this demographic group or whether the world they live
in will be so different that they’ll comprise a different demographic cohort.58
Demographic age cohorts are important to our study of management because, as we
said earlier, large numbers of people at certain stages in the life cycle can constrain deci-
sions and actions taken by businesses, governments, educational institutions, and other
organizations. In Canada the proportion of the population older than 65 was 13.7 percent
in the latest census59 and is expected to increase to 26.5 percent by 2051.60 This aging of
the population will result in a labour shortage, and creative ways will need to be found to
keep seniors working beyond the age of 65, along with pressure to increase immigration.
Another effect will be a mounting fiscal burden, with fewer taxpayers to support each
retired person (3.6 in Canada in 1995 and projected to be only 1.6 by 2050). We as a soci-
ety and our politicians as our voice will be forced to make difficult choices to balance theneeds of the aging population (for health care, in particular) and the needs of the general
population (for education and social benefits such as welfare and employment insurance)
with our capacity to pay for them. The aged will also face significant cultural challenges
as they will have fewer children and grandchildren to care for them in family settings.61
Technological Conditions In terms of the general environment, the most rapid changes
have occurred in technology. We live in a time of continuous technological change. For
instance, advances in genomics and bioinformatics has made it such that and individual’s
genetic information can be used to create personalized medicines that meet their unique
medical needs.62 Information gadgets are getting smaller and more powerful. We have
automated offices, electronic meetings, robotic manufacturing, lasers, integrated circuits,
faster and more powerful microprocessors, cloud computing, synthetic fuels, and entirely
From technology to work
attitudes, the Gen Y age group
is making its imprint in the
workplace. Gen Y is an important
demographic at Facebook,
where most employees are
under 40. The company values
the passion and pioneering spirit
of its young employees who enjoy
taking on the challenge of build-
ing ground-breaking technology
and the excitement of working in
a fast-paced environment with
considerable change and ambi-
guity. Facebook has created a
casual and fun-loving work envi-
ronment where its young cohorts
interact in a creative climate that
encourages experimentation and
tolerates conflict and risk.
Paul Sakuma/AP Photos
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
20/27
54 Part 1 DEFINING THE MANAGER’S TERRAIN
new models of doing business in an electronic age. It is possible that nano sensors may
someday be able to “smell” cancer, allowing physicians to employ a nano device rather
than having to do a biopsy.63 Companies that capitalize on technology, such as Black-
berry, eBay, and Google, prosper, and again struggle or change to meet the realities of
newer disruptive technologies. In addition, many successful retailers such as Walmart
use sophisticated information systems to keep on top of current sales trends. Similarly,
hospitals, universities, airports, police departments, and even military organizations that
adapt to major technological advances have a competitive edge over those that do not. The
whole area of technology is radically changing the fundamental ways that organizations
are structured and the way that managers manage.
How the Organizational Environment Affects ManagersKnowing what the various components of the organizational environment are is important
to managers. However, understanding how the organizational environment affects manag-
ers is equally important. The organizational environment affects managers through the
degree of uncertainty that is present and through the various stakeholder relationships
that exist between the organization and its external constituencies.
Assessing Environmental UncertaintyNot all environments are the same. They differ by what we call their degree of environmental
uncertainty , which is the degree of change and the degree of complexity in an organiza-
tion’s environment (see Exhibit 2-7).
The first of these dimensions is the degree of change. If the components in an orga-
nization’s environment change frequently, we call it a dynamic environment. If change is
minimal, we call it a stable one. A stable environment might be one in which there are no
new competitors, few technological breakthroughs by current competitors, little activity by
pressure groups to influence the organization, and so forth. For instance, Zippo Canada,
best known for its Zippo lighters, faces a relatively stable environment. There are few com-
petitors and there is little technological change. Probably the main environmental concern
for the company is the declining trend in tobacco smokers, although the company’s lighters
have other uses and global markets remain attractive.
environmental uncertainty The
degree of change and the degree
of complexity in an organization’s
environment.
Exhibit 2-7
Environmental Uncertainty Matrix
Cell 1
Stable and predictable environment
Few components in environment
Components are somewhat similar and remain basically the same
Minimal need for sophisticated knowledge of components
Cell 2
Degree of Change
DynamicStable
S i m p
l e
C o m p l e x
D e g r e e o f C o m p l e x i t y
Dynamic and unpredictable environment
Few components in environment
Components are somewhat similar but are in continual process of change
Minimal need for sophisticated knowledge of components
Cell 3
Stable and predictable environment
Many components in environment
Components are not similar to one another and remain basically the same
High need for sophisticated knowledge of components
Cell 4
Dynamic and unpredictable environment
Many components in environment
Components are not similar to one another and are in continual process of change
High need for sophisticated knowledge of components
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
21/27
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
22/27
56 Part 1 DEFINING THE MANAGER’S TERRAIN
Why is stakeholder relationship management important? Why should managers care
about managing stakeholder relationships? 65 It can lead to improved predictability of
environmental changes, more successful innovations, a greater degree of trust among
stakeholders, and greater organizational flexibility to reduce the impact of change. But
does it affect organizational performance? The answer is yes! Management researchers
who have looked at this issue are finding that managers of high-performing companies
tend to consider the interests of all major stakeholder groups as they make decisions.66
The more critical the stakeholder and the more uncertain the environment, the moremanagers need to rely on establishing explicit stakeholder partnerships rather than just
acknowledging their existence. An organization depends on these external groups as
sources of inputs (resources) and as outlets for outputs (goods and services), and manag-
ers should consider the interests of these external groups as they make decisions and take
actions. We address this issue in more detail in Chapter 5 as we look at the concepts of
managerial ethics and corporate social responsibility.
Exhibit 2-8
Organizational Stakeholders
Media
GovernmentsSuppliers
Trade and IndustryAssociations
Communities
CompetitorsShareholders
Social and PoliticalAction Groups
Unions
CustomersEmployees
Organization
-
8/16/2019 Cpter 2 Management 11th s Mary Coulter PDF Qwerty80 22 35
23/27
CHAPTER 2
SUMMARY AND IMPLICATIONS
1.
Compare and contrast the actions of managers according to the omnipo-
tent and symbolic views. The omnipotent view of management suggests that man-
agers are directly responsible for an organization’s success or failure. While this is the
dominant view of managers, there is another perspective. The symbolic view of manage-
ment argues that much of an organization’s success or failure is due to external forces
outside managers’ control. The reality is probably somewhere in between these two views,
with managers often able to exert control, but also facing situations over which they have
no control.
▶▶▶ At 3M, the 15 percent rule allows technical employees to work on projects to
which they feel a personal commitment (the omnipotent view). However, when marketscollapsed in 2001 (after 9/11 and the dot-com bust) and again in late 2008 (as a result
of the subprime mortgage crisis), the company found itself at the mercy of market forces
beyond its managers’ control (symbolic view).
2. Discuss the characteristics and importance of organizational culture.
Culture influences how people act within an organization. A strong culture in which
everyone supports the goals of the organization makes it easier for managers to achieve
goals. A weak culture, in which people do not feel connected to the organization, can
make things more difficult for managers. Managers can also influence culture through
how it is conveyed to employees, which employees are hired, and how rewards occur in
organizations.
▶▶▶ The innovation culture at 3M changed when James McNerney moved the cultural
pendulum toward efficiency of operation and away from innovation. The pendulum swung
back toward innovation with the appointment of George Buckley in 2005.
3. Describe what kinds of cultures managers can create. Managers can create a
variety of cultures. In this chapter, we discussed ethical, innovative, customer-responsive,
and diversity supportive cultures. By having a culture that is consistent with organizational
goals and values, managers can more easily encourage employees to achieve organizational
goals and values.
▶▶▶ At 3M managers not only “talk the talk,” they also “walk the talk” in their approach
to collaboration and the incentives that support the stated cultural objectives.
4.
Describe the features of the specific and general organizational envi-
ronments. The organizational e