Cox 2 Pattern

6
Cytoplasmic induction and over-expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in human prostate cancer: implications for prevention and treatment S. MADAAN*, P.D. ABEL*, K.S. CHAUDHARY, R. HEWITT, M.A. STOTT², G.W.H. STAMP and E.-N. LALANI Departments of Histopathology and *Surgery, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London and ²Department of Urology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK Objective To assess the level and morphological distribu- tion of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and -2 in human prostates and to determine any association with the Gleason grade of prostate cancer. Materials and methods The study comprised 30 samples from patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and 82 with prostate cancer. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess the expression of COX-1 and -2, and 13 samples were also assessed using immunoblotting (six BPH and seven cancers). Results For both BPH and prostate cancer, COX-1 expression was primarily in the fibromuscular stroma, with variable weak cytoplasmic expression in glandular/neoplastic epithelial cells. In contrast, COX-2 expression differed markedly between BPH and cancer. In BPH there was membranous expression of COX-2 in luminal glandular cells and no stromal expression. In cancer the stromal expression of COX-2 was unaltered, but expression by tumour cells was significantly greater (P=0.008), with a change in the staining pattern from membranous to cytoplasmic (P<0.001). COX-2 expression was significantly higher in poorly differentiated than in well differ- entiated tumours (P<0.001). These results were supported by immunoblotting, which showed similar levels of COX-1 in both BPH and cancer, but four times greater expression of COX-2 in cancer than in BPH. Conclusion This is the first study to assess the co- expression of COX-1 and COX-2 proteins in benign and malignant human prostates, and showed the induction and significantly greater expression of COX- 2 in cancer, which was also associated with tumour grade. The regular use of nonsteroidal anti-inflam- matory drugs is associated with a reduced incidence of cancers. The present results provide the basis for a potential role for COX-2 inhibitors in the prevention and treatment of prostate cancer. Keywords BPH, prostate cancer, cyclooxygenase, NSAIDs, prevention Introduction Prostate cancer is the commonest adenocarcinoma and second commonest cause of cancer death in men in the Western hemisphere [1]. The progression of prostate cancer is a multistep process and involves dysregulation of cell proliferation and death, development of invasive and metastatic phenotype, and the acquisition of hormone insensitivity [2]. Epidemiological studies of prostate cancer show an association between increased incidence of the disease and a high dietary intake of fat, especially animal fat [3]. This is thought to be related to the growth stimulating effects of the n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), e.g. arachidonic acid, present in animal fats, mediated by PGs and leukotrienes [3]. Prostaglandins are derived from n-6 PUFAs by a series of enzymic reactions. The first rate- limiting step in PG synthesis from arachidonic acid involves the cyclooxygenases (COXs), also known as PG G/H synthases. Consistent with the model that PGs derived from dietary fats may predispose to various cancers, several population-based studies have shown that regular use of aspirin and other NSAIDs results in a 40–50% decrease in the relative risk of colorectal cancer [4,5]. This is relevant because NSAIDs act through inhibiting COXs. In a recent population-based case- control study, there was a trend towards reduced risk of advanced prostate cancer with regular use of NSAIDs [6]. There are two COX isoforms, COX-1 and COX-2, that differ both in their regulation and tissue distribution [7]. COX-1 is a constitutively expressed ‘housekeeping’ gene involved in processes like gastric acid secretion, vascular Accepted for publication 10 July 2000 BJU International (2000), 86, 736–741 # 2000 BJU International 736

description

tyu

Transcript of Cox 2 Pattern

  • Cytoplasmic induction and over-expression ofcyclooxygenase-2 in human prostate cancer: implications forprevention and treatmentS. MADAAN*, P.D. ABEL*, K.S. CHAUDHARY, R. HEWITT, M.A. STOTT, G.W.H. STAMP and

    E.-N. LALANI

    Departments of Histopathology and *Surgery, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London and

    Department of Urology, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK

    Objective To assess the level and morphological distribu-

    tion of cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and -2 in human

    prostates and to determine any association with the

    Gleason grade of prostate cancer.

    Materials and methods The study comprised 30 samples

    from patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)

    and 82 with prostate cancer. Immunohistochemistry

    was used to assess the expression of COX-1 and -2, and

    13 samples were also assessed using immunoblotting

    (six BPH and seven cancers).

    Results For both BPH and prostate cancer, COX-1

    expression was primarily in the fibromuscular

    stroma, with variable weak cytoplasmic expression

    in glandular/neoplastic epithelial cells. In contrast,

    COX-2 expression differed markedly between BPH and

    cancer. In BPH there was membranous expression of

    COX-2 in luminal glandular cells and no stromal

    expression. In cancer the stromal expression of COX-2

    was unaltered, but expression by tumour cells was

    significantly greater (P=0.008), with a change in the

    staining pattern from membranous to cytoplasmic

    (P

  • homeostasis and water reabsorption by the renal

    collecting tubules. In contrast, COX-2 is inducible and

    thought to be involved in differentiative processes such as

    inflammation and ovulation [7]. Of the two isoforms,

    COX-2 is the most consistently up-regulated in many

    cancers, including oesophagus [8], stomach [9], colon

    [10], lung [11], pancreas [12] and head and neck [13].

    Recent studies on rat mammary glands suggest that

    hormonal influences on cancer development may also be

    mediated by COX-2 gene expression and PG synthesis

    [14,15]. COX-2 inhibitors are chemopreventive against

    colon [16] and lung cancers [17] in mouse models.

    Furthermore, COX-2/ApcD716 double-gene knockout

    mice have fewer and smaller intestinal polyps than

    ApcD716 knockout mice [18]. Evidence that increased

    levels of COX-2 may be important in the development of

    prostate cancer comes from preliminary results in human

    [19,20] and canine prostates [21]. Thus the aim of the

    present study was to assess the co-expression of COX-1

    and -2 proteins in adult human benign and malignant

    prostates, and to analyse their expression pattern.

    Materials and methods

    The study included 112 specimens (formalin-fixed and

    fresh-frozen) of prostates obtained during TURP (30 of

    BPH and 82 of adenocarcinoma), from the Department

    of Histopathology and Human Biomaterials Resource

    Centre, Imperial College School of Medicine,

    Hammersmith Hospital Campus, London, and the

    Department of Histopathology, West Middlesex

    University Hospital, London. The median (range) age of

    the patients was 70 (5192) years. The tumours were

    graded according to the Gleason system by one author

    (E-N.L.). Of the adenocarcinomas, 10 were well differ-

    entiated (Gleason grade 24), 32 moderately differen-

    tiated (Gleason grade 57) and 40 poorly differentiated

    (Gleason grade 810).

    For immunohistochemistry (IHC) all specimens were

    fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, paraffin

    embedded and processed routinely; 4 mm thick serialsections were taken onto poly-L-lysine-coated slides. A

    three-step immunoperoxidase method (described pre-

    viously [22]) was used to detect the expression of COX.

    Briefly, sections were de-waxed in xylene, hydrated

    through graded alcohols and water, and immersed in

    0.3% v/v H2O2 in distilled water for 30 min to block

    endogenous peroxidases. Antigens were retrieved by

    microwaving at 750 W for 15 min in 0.01 mol/L

    trisodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0). Sections were rinsed

    well in standard PBS (pH 7.27.4) and nonspecific

    binding sites blocked with 10% normal rabbit serum

    (Dako, Denmark) for 30 min. Sections were incubated

    with COX-1 (160110) or COX-2 (160112) mouse mAb

    (Cayman Chemicals, Ann Arbor, MI) at a dilution of

    1 : 300 and 1 : 200 in PBS, respectively, for 16 h at 4uC.After rinsing with PBS, sections were incubated with

    biotinylated rabbit antimouse immunoglobulins (Dako)

    at a dilution of 1 : 200 in PBS for 45 min. Sections were

    rinsed with PBS and incubated with avidin-biotin

    horseradish peroxidase complex solution (Dako) for

    30 min, rinsed with PBS and immersed for 510 min

    in a peroxidase substrate solution containing 0.05% w/v

    3,3k-diaminobenzidine (Sigma Chemical Co., Poole, UK)and 0.02% v/v H2O2 in PBS. Sections were counter-

    stained with Coles haematoxylin (Pioneer Research

    Chemicals, UK), dehydrated, cleared, and mounted in

    mounting medium. Normal colon sections known to

    express COX-1 and COX-2 were used as positive controls,

    while for negative controls the primary antibody was

    replaced with PBS. The immunostaining was evaluated

    independently by two authors (S.M. and E-N.L.) analys-

    ing the intensity, distribution and pattern of immuno-

    staining. If there was a discrepancy, a consensus was

    reached after further evaluation. The intensity of

    immunostaining was graded as 0 (negative), 1 (weak),

    2 (moderate) and 3 (strong).

    Western blotting was used on 13 fresh-frozen samples

    (six BPH and seven prostate cancers); 30 sections (15 mmthick) were cut from each sample using a cryostat (at

    x25uC) and placed in pre-chilled Eppendorf microfugetubes. The tubes were transferred to ice and 300 mL oflysis buffer (715 mol/L 2-mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol,

    2% SDS, 40 mmol/L Tris pH 6.8, 1 mmol/L EDTA)

    containing a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Boehringer

    Mannheim, UK) was added to each tube. After 20 min

    the lysates were centrifuged at 13 000 rpm at 4uC for5 min. The supernatants were transferred to clean

    microfuge tubes and the protein concentration deter-

    mined using a protein assay reagent (Bio-Rad

    Laboratories, Hercules, CA) and Ultraspec III spectro-

    photometer (Pharmacia Biotech, UK). About 30 mg oftotal protein from each sample was subjected to SDS-

    PAGE, the proteins transferred to nitrocellulose mem-

    branes (Millipore, UK), and the membranes blocked with

    5% non-fat milk (Marvel, Cadbury Schweppes, UK) in

    Tris-buffered saline solution containing 0.5% Tween 20

    (TBST) for 1 h at room temperature. The blots were then

    probed overnight with COX-1 or COX-2 mouse mAb

    (Cayman Chemicals) at a dilution of 1 : 1000, washed in

    TBST for 1 h with a change of buffer every 10 min, and

    probed with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit

    antimouse immunoglobulins (Dako) at a dilution of

    1 : 1000. After another wash in TBST for 2 h with a

    change of buffer every 15 min, the blots were placed in

    enhanced chemiluminescence solution (ECL, Amersham,

    UK) and exposed to X-ray film (Hyperfilm, Amersham).

    The relative expressions of the different proteins were

    COX-1 AND -2 EXPRESSION IN PROSTATE 737

    # 2000 BJU International 86, 736741

  • measured using a densitometer (Molecular Dynamics,

    UK).

    Fishers exact test was used to compare the intensity

    and pattern of expression of COX-1 and COX-2 between

    benign and malignant samples, and among the various

    grades of malignancy, with P

  • and prostate cancer. The results from six samples (three

    BPH and three prostate cancers) are shown in Fig. 2.

    Discussion

    This study showed that COX-1 and COX-2 are differen-

    tially expressed in benign prostates, and that the

    expression of COX-2 differed significantly between BPH

    and prostate cancer samples. COX-2 was expressed in

    luminal glandular epithelial cells of BPH and in the

    neoplastic epithelial cells of prostate cancers. However,

    the level of expression in the epithelial cells of prostate

    cancers was significantly higher than that in BPH. The

    results of IHC were supported by immunoblotting. The

    intracellular localization of COX-2 in the epithelial cells of

    BPH and prostate cancer also differed. While in BPH it

    was mainly localized at the basal and basolateral cell

    membrane, in prostate cancers it was predominantly

    cytoplasmic. In contrast, COX-1 protein expression was

    not significantly different between BPH and prostate

    cancer; in both tissues staining was primarily stromal,

    with variable weak cytoplasmic expression in the

    epithelial component. The expression of COX-1 on IHC

    did not vary (P=0.72), while COX-2 expressionincreased with grade (P

  • cell adhesion [26], over-expression of matrix-metallo-

    proteinase 2 with an associated increase in invasiveness

    [28], and modulated production of angiogenic factors by

    cancer cells [29]. COX-2 over-expression in cancer cells

    has also been shown to inhibit immune surveillance [30]

    and increase metastatic potential [28]. Furthermore,

    COXs may play a role in the bioactivation of several

    polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and aromatic amines,

    two classes of carcinogens which induce extrahepatic

    neoplasia [31].

    To our knowledge the present is the first study

    analysing the expression of COX-1 and COX-2 proteins

    in benign and malignant human prostates. Given that

    the actions of COX-2 induce features of the malignant

    phenotype, there is a powerful argument that COX-2

    should be evaluated further as a promising therapeutic

    target, both in prostate cancer and in other cancers.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was partly funded by a grant from The Friends

    of Hammersmith Hospital. We thank Dr R.W. Stirling,

    Consultant Histopathologist, West Middlesex University

    Hospital, London for providing us with some of the

    prostate cancer samples. We also thank Prof. A. Wanji,

    University of Hong Kong for reviewing the manuscript

    and constructive suggestions.

    References1 Lalani EN, Laniado ME, Abel PD. Molecular and cellular

    biology of prostate cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 1997; 16:

    2966

    2 Chaudhary KS, Abel PD, Lalani EN. Role of the Bcl-2 gene

    family in prostate cancer progression and its implications for

    therapeutic intervention. Environ Health Perspect 1999;

    107: 4957

    3 Rose DP, Connolly JM. Dietary fat, fatty acids and prostate

    cancer. Lipids 1992; 27: 798803

    4 Thun MJ. NSAID use and decreased risk of gastrointestinal

    cancers. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1996; 25: 33348

    5 DuBois RN, Giardiello FM, Smalley WE. Nonsteroidal anti-

    inflammatory drugs, eicosanoids, and colorectal cancer

    prevention. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1996; 25: 77391

    6 Norrish AE, Jackson RT, McRae CU. Non-steroidal anti-

    inflammatory drugs and prostate cancer progression. Int

    J Cancer 1998; 77: 5115

    7 Smith WL, Dewitt DL. Prostaglandin endoperoxide H

    synthases-1 and -2. Adv Immunol 1996; 62: 167215

    8 Zimmermann KC, Sarbia M, Weber AA, Borchard F,

    Gabbert HE, Schror K. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in

    human esophageal carcinoma. Cancer Res 1999; 59: 198

    204

    9 Ristimaki A, Honkanen N, Jankala H, Sipponen P,

    Harkonen M. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in human

    gastric carcinoma. Cancer Res 1997; 57: 127680

    10 Sano H, Kawahito Y, Wilder RL et al. Expression of

    cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 in human colorectal cancer.

    Cancer Res 1995; 55: 37859

    11 Hida T, Yatabe Y, Achiwa H et al. Increased expression of

    cyclooxygenase 2 occurs frequently in human lung cancers,

    specifically in adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res 1998; 58:

    37614

    12 Tucker ON, Dannenberg AJ, Yang EK et al. Cyclooxygenase-

    2 expression is up-regulated in human pancreatic cancer.

    Cancer Res 1999; 59: 98790

    13 Chan G, Boyle JO, Yang EK et al. Cyclooxygenase-2

    expression is up-regulated in squamous cell carcinoma of

    the head and neck. Cancer Res 1999; 59: 9914

    14 Badawi AF, El Sohemy A, Stephen LL, Ghoshal AK, Archer

    MC. The effect of dietary n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty

    acids on the expression of cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 and levels

    of p21ras in rat mammary glands. Carcinogenesis 1998; 19:

    90510

    15 Badawi AF, Archer MC. Effect of hormonal status on the

    expression of the cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 genes and

    prostaglandin synthesis in rat mammary glands.

    Prostaglandins Other Lipid Med 1998; 56: 16781

    16 Kawamori T, Rao CV, Seibert K, Reddy BS. Chemo-

    preventive activity of celecoxib, a specific cyclooxygenase-

    2 inhibitor, against colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1998;

    58: 40912

    17 Rioux N, Castonguay A. Prevention of NNK-induced lung

    tumorigenesis in A/J mice by acetylsalicylic acid and NS-

    398. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 535460

    18 Oshima M, Dinchuk JE, Kargman SL et al. Suppression of

    intestinal polyposis in ApcD716 knockout mice by inhibi-

    tion of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2). Cell 1996; 87: 8039

    19 Madaan S, Lalani EN, Chaudhary KS, Stamp GWH, Abel PD.

    COX-1 induction and COX-2 overexpression in prostatic

    adenocarcinomas. Eur Urol 1999; 36: 495

    20 Gupta S, Srivastava M, Ahmad N, Bostwick DG, Mukhtar H.

    Over-expression of cyclooxygenase-2 in human prostate

    adenocarcinoma. Prostate 2000; 42: 738

    21 Tremblay C, Dore M, Bochsler PN, Sirois J. Induction

    of prostaglandin G/H synthase-2 in a canine model of

    spontaneous prostatic adenocarcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst

    1999; 91: 1398403

    22 Chaudhary KS, Lu QL, Abel PD et al. Expression of bcl-2 and

    p53 oncoproteins in schistosomiasis-associated transitional

    and squamous cell carcinoma of urinary bladder. Br J Urol

    1997; 79: 7884

    23 Gottard S. Relevance of fatty acids and eicosanoids to clinical

    and preventive medicine. Prog Lipid Res 1986; 25: 14

    24 Chaudry AA, Wahle KW, McClinton S, Moffat LE.

    Arachidonic acid metabolism in benign and malignant

    prostatic tissue in vitro: effects of fatty acids and cycloox-

    ygenase inhibitors. Int J Cancer 1994; 57: 17680

    25 Tjandrawinata RR, Dahiya R, Hughes Fulford M. Induction

    of cyclo-oxygenase-2 mRNA by prostaglandin E2 in human

    prostatic carcinoma cells. Br J Cancer 1997; 75: 11118

    26 Tsujii M, DuBois RN. Alterations in cellular adhesion and

    apoptosis in epithelial cells overexpressing prostaglandin

    endoperoxide synthase 2. Cell 1995; 83: 493501

    740 S. MADAAN et al .

    # 2000 BJU International 86, 736741

  • 27 Liu XH, Yao S, Kirschenbaum A, Levine AC. NS398, a

    selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, induces apoptosis and

    down-regulates bcl-2 expression in LNCaP cells. Cancer Res

    1998; 58: 42459

    28 Tsujii M, Kawano S, DuBois RN. Cyclooxygenase-2 expres-

    sion in human colon cancer cells increases metastatic

    potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 333640

    29 Tsujii M, Kawano S, Tsuji S, Sawaoka H, Hori M, DuBois

    RN. Cyclooxygenase regulates angiogenesis induced by

    colon cancer cells. Cell 1998; 93: 70516

    30 Huang M, Stolina M, Sharma S et al. Non-small cell lung

    cancer cyclooxygenase-2-dependent regulation of cytokine

    balance in lymphocytes and macrophages: up-regulation of

    interleukin 10 and down-regulation of interleukin 12

    production. Cancer Res 1998; 58: 120816

    31 Smith BJ, Curtis JF, Eling TE. Bioactivation of xenobiotics by

    prostaglandin H synthase. Chem Biol Interact 1991; 79:

    24564

    AuthorsS. Madaan, MS, FRCS, Clinical Research Fellow.

    P.D. Abel, ChM, FRCS, Reader in Urology and Honorary

    Consultant.

    K.S. Chaudhary, PhD, Senior House Officer.

    R. Hewitt, PhD, Clinical Scientist.

    M.A. Stott, FRCS, Consultant Urologist.

    G.W.H. Stamp, FRCPath, Chairman and Professor of

    Histopathology.

    E.N. Lalani, PhD, MRCPath, Reader in Molecular & Cellular

    Pathology and Honorary Consultant Histopathologist.

    Correspondence: Dr El-Nasir Lalani, Department of

    Histopathology, Division of Investigative Sciences, Imperial

    College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital Campus,

    Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, UK.

    e-mail: [email protected]

    COX-1 AND -2 EXPRESSION IN PROSTATE 741

    # 2000 BJU International 86, 736741