Coventry Society Newsletter - November 2014

2
November 2014 More news and views on our website: www.coventrysociety.org.uk We do not fully endorse the Council’s vision of growth of the city and we have said so in our representation on The New Coventry Local Development Plan. We said: “A city exists for its citizens and there is no benefit for them in wholesale expansion of the population. On the contrary they would suffer from the greater demand on the transport system, the hospital and other mainly fixed assets. We are not convinced that a population expansion, especially on the periphery of the city, will automatically lead to the improvement of the city centre. We believe that the vision for the city should be for a city of quality rather than a city of quantity. We think that the focus of the LDP should be on the improvement of the long established suburbs and the city centre. Population led planning We have sympathy with the Council in being coerced by Government to plan on the basis of the population projections of the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and the so called Strategic Housing Market Assessment. Population projections are, by their nature, trend based and backward looking. Previous experience demonstrates that such projections seldom become reality and the ONS projections themselves have changed by large numbers in a small space of time. Population projections might have some value in projecting school numbers five years ahead (although recent experience in the Council might cast doubt on that), but projecting 20 years up to 2031 is completely unrealistic. In the real world there is economic growth and decline, consumer confidence grows and wanes, market values go up and down, immigration rises and falls and none of this is forecast in the population projections and Strategic Housing Market Assessment. It is therefore important not to give up long held and community supported policy positions, such as Green Belt, without strong evidence of need that goes beyond the fickleness of population projections. The ONS projections were based on population figures derived from the 2011 census, which was during a period of rapid growth in the number of overseas students, following changes to the funding regime for universities. This rapid increase in the number of overseas students was a one-off event that will not continue into the future. Furthermore the ONS uses the UN definition of temporary immigration as those staying from three months to one year, whilst overseas students typically stay two to three years and are therefore regarded as permanent immigrants. Immigration numbers are very susceptible to public policy decisions, and the recent proclamations of the current Government might suggest that immigration might reduce in future years. This has not been taken into account in the projections guiding the development plan. Green Belt To give up significant areas of greenbelt on the basis of population projections that cannot be relied upon, puts at risk the opportunity to develop brownfield sites in the city. Early release of green belt sites will reduce the chance of developing brownfields sites. We believe that the rate of house building should be tied in with the growth of jobs in the city, so as not to create excessive commuting. The release of 10% of Coventry’s Green Belt land over a 10 – 15 year period could provide an unfortunate precedent that will be hard to resist in the future, leading to the eventual loss of all of Coventry’s Green Belt. The Society doesn’t disagree with the principle of growing the city, but disagrees with the scale and timing of this growth. We believe that the Green Belt should be protected until such time as it is proved additional land is required. The Society believes there should be a better balance between housing, jobs and the provision of infrastructure. We support the objective of improving the balance of housing in the city and the improved quality of housing, but do not share the view that it is necessary to locate such housing in the Green Belt.” The New Coventry Local Development Plan 2011-2031 Delivering Sustainable Growth September 2014 After 12,000 days in local government, who wouldn't turn to yoga and meditation? An illustrated talk by Peter Hunter with some lessons from three careers in local government, and why life afterwards is so sweet! Monday, November 10 at 7.30pm The Shop Front Theatre, City Arcade Light refreshments, £2 for visitors We often complain about the increasing dominance of students’ accommodation in the city centre. But here there is a clear positive side as Study Inn Group has shown with the recent re-cladding of Burges House on Ironmonger Square. It has transformed a dull and uninspiring building into a vibrant and colourful addition to the street scene. Picture: John Marshall

description

The November 2014 edition of the Coventry Society newsletter

Transcript of Coventry Society Newsletter - November 2014

Page 1: Coventry Society Newsletter - November 2014

November 2014

More news and views on our website: www.coventrysociety.org.uk

We do not fully endorse the Council’s vision of growth of the city and we have said so in our representation on The New Coventry Local Development Plan. We said: “A city exists for its citizens and there is no benefit for them in wholesale expansion of the population. On the contrary they would suffer from the greater demand on the transport system, the hospital and other mainly fixed assets. We are not convinced that a population expansion, especially on the periphery of the city, will automatically lead to the improvement of the city centre. We believe that the vision for the city should be for a city of quality rather than a city of quantity. We think that the focus of the LDP should be on the improvement of the long established suburbs and the city centre. Population led planning We have sympathy with the Council in being coerced by Government to plan on the basis of the population projections of the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and the so called Strategic Housing Market Assessment. Population projections are, by their nature, trend based and backward looking. Previous experience demonstrates that such projections seldom become reality and the ONS projections themselves have changed by large numbers in a small space of time. Population projections might have some value in projecting school numbers five years ahead (although recent experience in the Council might cast doubt on that), but projecting 20 years up to 2031 is completely unrealistic.

In the real world there is economic growth and decline, consumer confidence grows and wanes, market values go up and down, immigration rises and falls and none of this is forecast in the population projections and Strategic Housing Market Assessment. It is therefore important not to give up long held and community supported policy positions, such as Green Belt, without strong evidence of need that goes beyond the fickleness of population projections.

The ONS projections were based on population figures derived from the 2011 census, which was during a period of rapid growth in the number of overseas students, following changes to the funding regime for universities. This rapid increase in the number of overseas students was a one-off event that will not continue into the future. Furthermore the ONS uses the UN definition of temporary immigration as those staying from three months to one year, whilst overseas students typically stay two to

three years and are therefore regarded as permanent immigrants. Immigration numbers are very susceptible to public policy decisions, and the recent proclamations of the current Government might suggest that immigration might reduce in future years. This has not been taken into account in the projections guiding the development plan. Green Belt To give up significant areas of greenbelt on the basis of population projections that cannot be relied upon, puts at risk the opportunity to develop brownfield sites in the city. Early release of green belt sites will reduce the chance of developing brownfields sites. We believe that the rate of house building should be tied in with the growth of jobs in the city, so as not to create excessive commuting. The release of 10% of Coventry’s Green Belt land over a 10 – 15 year period could provide an unfortunate precedent that will be hard to resist in the future, leading to the eventual loss of all of Coventry’s Green Belt. The Society doesn’t disagree with the principle of growing the city, but disagrees with the scale and timing of this growth. We believe that the Green Belt should be protected until such time as it is proved additional land is required. The Society believes there should be a better balance between housing, jobs and the provision of infrastructure. We support the objective of improving the balance of housing in the city and the improved quality of housing, but do not share the view that it is necessary to locate such housing in the Green Belt.”

The New Coventry Local Development Plan 2011-2031 Delivering Sustainable Growth September 2014

After 12,000 days in local government, who wouldn't turn to yoga and meditation? An illustrated talk by Peter Hunter with some lessons from three careers in local

government, and why life afterwards is so sweet! Monday, November 10 at 7.30pm

The Shop Front Theatre, City Arcade Light refreshments, £2 for visitors

We often complain about the increasing

dominance of students’ accommodation

in the city centre. But here there is a

clear positive side as Study Inn Group

has shown with the recent re-cladding of

Burges House on Ironmonger Square.

It has transformed a dull and uninspiring

building into a vibrant and colourful

addition to the street scene.

Picture: John Marshall

Page 2: Coventry Society Newsletter - November 2014

Coventry University architecture students recently ‘took up residence’ in an empty shop in the City Arcade to stage Looking and Seeing,

a large scale model revealing how the city has looked over the last century. Using a large 1909 map the students had lined the streets

with buildings of plas"cine, all to a scale of 1:1000.

The project first of all showed the medieval city that had survived up to the war with another layer taking out the bomb damage, then

the building of the post war city. By peeling away the layers it was possible to see how our city centre has changed. It was par"cularly

interes"ng to see how the tall Cathedral spire dominated the landscape with

brown corridors of old buildings radia"ng out.

Students had outpu*ed the finding using stop mo"on film showing the

growth of the city.

Paul Maddocks said: “It’s an explora"on of the modernist movement using

Coventry city centre as its lab. Significantly Coventry was built at a "me

when Bri"sh planners led the world. They actually built what the great

architects of Europe could only talk about.

“It was a "me full of idealism and socialist values that gave birth to the

Welfare State and the Na"onal Health Service but also le3 us with some

disastrous town centre redevelopments, council estates and new towns.

“Looking and Seeing is an interes"ng a*empt to recapture some of the

idealism of these more op"mis"c "mes, to understand what it was that

Donald Gibson and his colleagues were trying to achieve.

“It is a case study in how high ideals and good inten"ons do not always

create great places.”

With Scotland and Wales ge8ng more

powers, a recent mee"ng aired some of the

views on ‘how the West Midlands can gain a

similar degree of self-governance?’ The

event was a half-day workshop hosted by

the University of Birmingham Ins"tute of

Advanced Studies. Speakers with na"onal,

regional and local policy experience

discussed what sort of voice the West

Midlands requires to be*er meet the needs

of its 5.2 million people.

Gisela Stuart MP for Edgbaston who

chaired the event said that change is

inevitable with many countries having a

federal system of a central

government and regional authori"es.

Contribu"ng organisa"ons included

Unlock Democracy, Futures Network West

Midlands, and the Centre for Urban and

Regional Studies at the University of

Birmingham.

The system that sets public spending in

Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland is

known as the Barne* funding formula,

named a3er its inventor, the former

Labour Treasury secretary Joel Barne*,

who devised it in the late 1970s. He now

says his formula is wrong.

John Payne and Les Fawce* went along

to the mee"ng and found it helpful to talk

and network with some of the delegates.

A3er several years of fraught

debate and uncertainty, the

future of the old

Cheylesmore pub site in

Daventry Road has finally

been se*led with the

opening of a new Asda

supermarket , which began

trading on October 6

John Marshall pictured the

building.

Contacts

Postal address: 77 Craven Street, Coventry CV5 8DT Chairman’s tel: 024 7640 2030 Email: [email protected] If Twitter is your thing, you can follow us at https://twitter.com/#!/CovSoc We also have our own page on Facebook. You can also follow us there at http://www.facebook.com/CoventrySociety

Calendars & Christmas Cards

The cards are all sized A6 and have a le3

hand fold and include a white envelope.

The message is Happy Christmas.

Packs of four cards at £2-50

This year’s calendar features 12 heritage scenes. They are now available at our monthly meetings priced at £6 each or £10

for two. On sale at the next two meetings. Or by post: One calendar £7-24 incl p&p. Two calendars £11-65 incl p&p. Cheques to Colin (77 Craven Street,

Coventry CV5 8DT