Course Requirements and Grading - University of … · University Health Service or appropriate...

21
UP/SW 655 – NEIGHBORHOOD P L A N N I N G -- F A L L 2016 1 University of Michigan Ann Arbor Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning Course Title: Neighborhood Planning (UP 655/SW 655) Mondays and Wednesdays: 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. North Campus, Art and Architecture Building, Room 2222 Instructor Information: Dr. Harley Etienne Contact Information: [email protected] Office Location and Hours: Room 2208-D, Art and Architecture Building (North Campus) Hours: By Appointment Only (please email to schedule) Course Description: The major focus of this class is to teach students the nature of neighborhood planning in the contemporary era by placing it in the context of the development, demise and revitalization of urban communities from the turn of the 20 th century to the present. A special emphasis is placed on the theory, history, practice and challenges of community development and neighborhood planning in the current era. Learning Objectives: Learn about the challenges of defining “neighborhood” and the difficulties of planning for discrete areas in the contemporary context; Review urban planning processes and understand the place of neighborhood planning within a larger professional context; Gain an understanding of the history and evolution of the community development movement and contemporary challenges facing its community development oriented institutions and organizations; Communicate confidently about contemporary practices used by and issues confronting community development institutions and community-based organizations; Develop an understanding of the various institutional and funding mechanisms involved in successful neighborhood planning projects; and, Course Requirements and Grading Assignment/Item Due Date Percent Total Panel Presentations (2 or 3) TBD 30% Response Paper 1 TBD 15% Response Paper 2 TBD 15% Response Paper 3 TBD 15% Class Participation Cumulative 25% Final Grade 100% Grading Scale: A+ = 95% + Instructor Discretion;A= 100 - 90; B+ = 89 - 86;B= 86 – 80;C= 79 – 65;F= 64 and Below.

Transcript of Course Requirements and Grading - University of … · University Health Service or appropriate...

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

1

UniversityofMichiganAnnArborTaubmanCollegeofArchitectureandUrbanPlanningCourseTitle:NeighborhoodPlanning(UP655/SW655)

MondaysandWednesdays:9:00–10:30a.m.NorthCampus,ArtandArchitectureBuilding,Room2222

InstructorInformation: Dr.HarleyEtienneContactInformation: [email protected]: Room2208-D,ArtandArchitectureBuilding(NorthCampus)

Hours:ByAppointmentOnly(pleaseemailtoschedule)CourseDescription:Themajorfocusofthisclassistoteachstudentsthenatureofneighborhoodplanninginthecontemporaryerabyplacingitinthecontextofthedevelopment,demiseandrevitalizationofurbancommunitiesfromtheturnofthe20thcenturytothepresent.Aspecialemphasisisplacedonthetheory,history,practiceandchallengesofcommunitydevelopmentandneighborhoodplanninginthecurrentera.LearningObjectives:• Learnaboutthechallengesofdefining“neighborhood”andthedifficultiesofplanningfordiscrete

areasinthecontemporarycontext;• Reviewurbanplanningprocessesandunderstandtheplaceofneighborhoodplanningwithina

largerprofessionalcontext;• Gainanunderstandingofthehistoryandevolutionofthecommunitydevelopmentmovementand

contemporarychallengesfacingitscommunitydevelopmentorientedinstitutionsandorganizations;• Communicateconfidentlyaboutcontemporarypracticesusedbyandissuesconfrontingcommunity

developmentinstitutionsandcommunity-basedorganizations;• Developanunderstandingofthevariousinstitutionalandfundingmechanismsinvolvedin

successfulneighborhoodplanningprojects;and,

CourseRequirementsandGrading

Assignment/Item DueDate PercentTotalPanelPresentations(2or3) TBD 30%ResponsePaper1 TBD 15%ResponsePaper2 TBD 15%ResponsePaper3 TBD 15%ClassParticipation Cumulative 25%FinalGrade 100%GradingScale:A+=95%+InstructorDiscretion;A=100-90;B+=89-86;B=86–80;C=79–65;F=64andBelow.

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

2

AssignmentsDiscussionLeadershipForthisassignment,eachstudentinthecoursewillchoosetwoorthreeclasssessions(dependingonfinalcourseenrollment)andleadclassdiscussionalongwiththeotherstudentswhohavechosenthatclasssession.Youwillaccessthesign-upthroughaGoogleDocthattheclasswillshare.Yourprimarytaskistorespondtothequestionslistedinthesyllabusunderthereadingsforeachday.Thequestionsareintendedtooutlinelearningobjectivesforeachtopicandprovideastructureforclassdiscussion.Thequestionsshouldnothoweverbeseenasa“checklist.”Discussionleadersareencouragedtoaddcomplementaryquestionsthatwillleadtoarich75-90minuteconversation.Ifdiscussionleadersfeelthatthereareadditionalreadingsormaterials(shortvideoclips,websites,etc.)thatwouldenrichourclassdiscussiononthatday’stopic.Discussionleaderswillbesubmittingtheirreactionpapersonthedaywhentheyleadclass(seebelow).Therefore,discussionleadersarestronglyencouragedtopresentargumentsandideaspresentedintheirreactionpapersduringclassdiscussion.Whilestudentsarebeingaskedtocoordinatetheirleadershipofclassdiscussions,thegradesareindividual.Eachstudentinresponsiblefortheirowncontributiontotheleadershipoftheclassdiscussion.Classdiscussionleadershipwillcomprise30%offinalgradesandwillreflectanaverageofscoresbetweenyour2(or3)classdiscussions.Giventhis,itisinyourbestinteresttoleaddiscussionatleasttwice,ifnotthreetimes.Thegradingrubricisasfollows:

50% CommandofAssignedMaterials/KnowledgeofTopic25% UseofDiscussionQuestions/QualityofAdditionalQuestions15% FacilitationofLargerClassDiscussion10% AbilitytoEngage/CooperatewithotherDiscussionLeaders

ResponsePapersFortheseassignments,studentswillchoosethreeindividualcoursetopics/sessionsandrespondtotheassignedreadingsineachinaconstructivewaythatbothsummarizesandchallengestheassignedreadings.Youmayusethe“DiscussionQuestions”toassistyoubutyourpapermustbewritteninthefirstpersonandincorporateathesisorposition.Yourtaskistonotsimplyprovethatyouhavedonethereadingbuthaveapositionaboutwhatyouhaveread.Formoreinformationonhowtowritea“good”reaction/responsepaper,pleasesee: https://twp.duke.edu/uploads/assets/response%20paper.pdf.Papersshouldbe4-6pages(notincludingcitations/bibliography),1”marginsonallsides,double-spaced,andcontaincitationsattheendofthedocumentintheformofabibliography(anyformat;e.g.MLA,Chicago,APA).AllpapersshouldbesubmittedviaCanvasbeforethestartofclassonthedaythatyoupresent.Paperssubmittedlaterwillbesubjecttoapenaltyofhalfofonegradeafterclassandone-letterdayperday.Afterthethirdday(includingweekends),yourpaperwillnotbeaccepted.Pleaseremembertoincludeyourname,andpagenumbers.

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

3

Intheeventthatyoupresentonlytwice,thefinalpaperwillbedueonatthestartofthelastclasssessiononDecember12,2016.Thegradingrubricisasfollows:

35% Thesis/PositionStatement/OverallPaperStructure30% CommandofAssignedMaterials/KnowledgeofTopic/SupplementalMaterialsIncluded25% WritingQuality(freefromgrammaticalandsyntaxerrors,clarityofwriting,etc.)

10% Bibliography&Citations(clear,consistent,correctformat,etc.)ClassAttendance:Youarealloweduptotwo(2)unexcusedabsences.Thiscoursewillonlyhave26classsessions.Atthree(3)absences—excusedornot—youwillhavemissed10percentofthecourseoverall.Atfourabsences,15%;atsixabsences,nearly25%.Toaccuratelyreflectyourabilitytocontributeandparticipateoverthecourseofthesemester,Iwilldeductthree(3)fullpercentagepointsfromyourClassParticipationscoreperunexcusedabsence.Forexample,eight(8)absencesoverallwillresultinyourlosing24points(fromapossible30)fromyourClassParticipationscore.Ifyoumustmissclassduetoextraordinaryillness,deathinthefamily,etc.,youmustfurnishdocumentationfromtheUniversityHealthServiceorappropriateauthorityascloseaspossibletothedateoftheabsenceitself.PleasenotethatIwillbetakingattendanceviaCanvasatthestartofclass.Latearrivalswillcountfor80%ofaregularlyattendedclass.ClassTime:Classmeetingsarescheduledtorunbetween9:00and10:30a.m.onMondaysandWednesdays.ToaccommodatestudentswhoarecomingfromCentralCampus,thiscoursewillhonorthe“MichiganTime”systemandstartpromptlyat9:10a.m.IfyouarecomingfromsomewhereotherthanCentralCampusandmustroutinelyarrivelaterthan9:10a.m.orleaveearlierthan10:20a.m.,pleaseconsultwiththecourseinstructorasearlyinthesemesteraspossible.ClassParticipation:Exactly25%ofyourfinalgradewillbedeterminedbyyourclassparticipation.Regularattendance,attentionandengagementareresponsibilitiesandrequirements,notsuggestions.PleasenotethatClassParticipationisnotaproformapartofyourgrade.Onlythemostexceptionalcontributorstoclassdiscussionwillreceivethefull25%.RegularclassattendancealonewillnotguaranteeahighClassParticipationscore.NB:Askingquestionsthatareevidentintheclassreadingsorclassdiscussionarenotnecessarily“participation.”Onoccasion,IwillemploytheSocraticMethodandaskquestionsofstudentsonthatday’sassignedreadings.Studentswhorepeatedlyfailtoanswerquestionscorrectlywillhavetheirclassparticipationscorereduced.Therubricforgradinginthisareaisasfollows:22.5–25.0 Exceptional contributions to class discussions; students and instructor learned from

students’contributionstoclassdiscussionandclimate;18.75–22.4 Goodparticipantinclass;wasconsistentlyandactivelyengaged,evenifnotspeaking; generallyaddedpositivelytoclassroomdiscussionandactivities;16.25–18.74 Acceptable;wasoftenengagedwithsomeexceptions;12.0–16.24 Fair;wasoftennotengaged;didnotaddpositivelytoclassdiscussionorclimate;<11.9 Unacceptable;disruptive;hostiletowardsclassmates,instructor&staffand/ornegative influenceonclassdiscussionsandclimate.

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

4

CommunicatingwiththeProfessor:IfyouemailProfessorEtienne,pleaseallow48hoursforaresponse.Facultymaynotalwaysbeavailableforimmediateresponses.Re-GradingPolicy:Iwillre-gradeanyworkwithinoneweekofmyreturningpaperstostudents.IfIhaveerredinmygrading,youwillbeawardedfullcreditforthemistake.However,Ireservetherighttore-gradetheentirepaperandwillcorrectanyothererrorsImayhavemissed—whethertheyraiseorloweryourfinalgrade.Thisalsoappliestoanypartialcreditawarded.Ineffect,yourgradeonanyre-gradedpaperorexammaygodowninsteadofup.Pleasebesurethatyouwanttoengagethere-gradingprocessbeforechallengingyourgrade(s).Laptop/Tablet/CellPhonesandFoodPolicies:Theuselaptops,cell/mobilephones,iPods,iPads,tablets,iPhones,Droids,mp3playersandothercomparableelectronicdevicesisstronglydiscouragedunlessabsolutelynecessaryforclassparticipation.Tabletsmaybeusediftheyarebeingusedtoaccessclassreadingsandtext.Allotherelectroniccommunicationdevicesshouldbeturnedoffpriortothestartofclass.Studentsshouldalsoavoidbringingfullmealsanddistractingsnackstoclass(e.g.loud,smelly,offensive,dangeroustostudentswithnutallergies,vegan,etc.).Coffeedrinks,waterandothersoftdrinksareacceptableassumingthattheydonotdistractfromclassdiscussion.FailuretoabidebythesepolicieswillresultinasubstantialreductioninthefinalClassParticipationgrade.Astheinstructorofthecourse,Ireservetherighttoaskanystudentwhodisruptsclassthroughtheviolationofthesepoliciestoleavetheclassroom.StatementonAcademicIntegrityAsamemberoftheuniversitycommunity,andstudentintheRackhamSchoolofGraduateStudies,youareboundbytheirrespectiverulesandregulationsonAcademicandProfessionalIntegrity.IfyouareunfamiliarwiththeUniversityofMichigan’sorRackhamSchoolofGraduateStudies’policiesonacademicandprofessionalmisconduct,pleasevisitthefollowingpage:http://www.rackham.umich.edu/current-students/policies/academic-policies/section11AccommodationsforStudentswithDisabilitiesIncompliancewiththeUniversityofMichiganRackhamGraduateSchoolpolicy,Iamavailabletodiscussappropriateacademicaccommodationsthatmayberequiredforstudentswithdisabilities.Requestsforacademicaccommodationsshouldbemadeduringthefirstthreeweeksofthesemester,exceptforunusualcircumstances,soarrangementscanbemade.StudentsareencouragedtoregisterwithOfficeofServicesforStudentswithDisabilitiestodetermineeligibilityforappropriateaccommodations.See:http://www.rackham.umich.edu/policies/accommodations_for_graduate_students_with_disabilities/ServicesforStudentswithDisabilities:http://ssd.umich.edu//

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

5

CourseReadingsandScheduleNB:Thescheduleofreadingsandtopicsaresubjecttochange.Wednesday,September7,2016(1)CourseIntroductionandOverviewDiscussionQuestions:

1. Whatisyourdefinitionofa“neighborhood”?2. Whatfactorsdoyoubelievehavecontributed(orarecontributing)tothe“failure”ofurban

neighborhoods?3. Whattopicsdoyoumosthopethatwe’llcoveroverthecourseofthesemester?

Monday,September12,2016(2)Whatisa“Successful”CommunityorNeighborhood?A. AmericanPlanningAssociation.2015.“CharacteristicsandGuidelinesofGreatNeighborhoods,”

https://www.planning.org/greatplaces/neighborhoods/characteristics.htm

B. Talen,Emily,SunnyMenozziandChloeScheafer.2015.“Whatisa‘GreatNeighborhood’?AnAnalysisofAPA’sTop-RatedPlaces.”JournaloftheAmericanPlanningAssociation,81(2):121–141.(Canvas&Library)

C. Galster,George.2001.“OntheNatureofNeighborhoods,”UrbanStudies,38(12):2111-2124.

(Canvas&Library)RecommendedD. Talen,E.2000.“TheProblemwithCommunityinPlanning,”JournalofPlanningLiterature,

15(2):171-183.(Canvas&Library)DiscussionQuestions:

1. Do“neighborhoods”differfrom“communities”?Ifso,how?2. Whatdistinguishesa“badneighborhood”froma“good”or“great’one?3. Whoismostresponsibleforcreatingandmaintaininga“goodneighborhood”?4. Aretherebestcasesofneighborhoodsthathavegonefrom“bad”to“good”or“great”?

Whatdoweknow(ornotknow)abouthowtheymadesuchtransitions?

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

6

Wednesday,September14,2016(3)ThePlanningProcess&ZoningA. Rohe,WilliamM.2009.“FromLocaltoGlobal:OneHundredYearsofNeighborhoodPlanning,”

JournaloftheAmericanPlanningAssociation75(2):209–230.(Canvas&Library)

B. Steiner,FrederickandKentButler.2007.“Part1,“PlanMaking,”and“TypesofPlans,”pp.3-31.PlanningandUrbanDesignStandards(StudentEdition).Chicago:AmericanPlanningAssociation.(FullbookisavailablethroughtheMichiganLibraryCallNo.TH2031.S742012)(Canvas)

Recommended

C. Jones,Bernie.1990.“Chapter1:AnIntroductiontoNeighborhoodPlanning.”NeighborhoodPlanning:AGuideforCitizensandPlanners.Chicago:AmericanPlanningAssociation.(Canvas)

DiscussionQuestions:

1. Whatis“urbanplanning”?2. Whatisthehistoryofthefield?Andhowisneighborhoodplanningapartofit?3. Whatarethemostcurrenttrendsinplanningpractice?knowledge?theory?4. Givenwhatwenowknow,whatisneighborhoodplanning?5. Whatarethemostcurrenttrendsinneighborhoodplanning?

Monday,September19,2016(4)PhysicalDesignandNeighborhoodsA. Steiner,FrederickandKentButler.2007.“Part4,“PlacesandDistricts,”Planningand

UrbanDesignStandards(StudentEdition).Chicago:AmericanPlanningAssociation.(FullbookisavailablethroughtheMichiganLibraryCallNo.TH2031.S742012),pp.227-261.(Canvas)

B. Duany,Andres,ElizabethPlater-Zyberk,JeffSpeck.2010.“Chapter9:TheInnerCity,”and“Chapter 10:HowtoMakeaTown.”NewYork:Macmillian.(Canvas)

C. Miller,WilhelmineD.CraigR.Pollack,andDavidR.Williams.2011.“HealthyHomesandCommunities,”AmericanJournalofPreventativeMedicine,40(1),Supplement1:S48-S57.(CanvasandLibrary)

RecommendedD. Manzo,L.andD.Perkins.2006.“FindingCommonGround:theimportanceofplace

attachmenttocommunityparticipationandplanning,”JournalofPlanningLiterature,20(4):335-350.(Canvas&Library)

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

7

DiscussionQuestions

1. Whatarethespatialcharacteristicsof“goodneighborhoods”?2. Can“goodneighborhoods”bedesignedorplanned?3. Isthereanideallayoutforagoodneighborhood?4. Arethereexamplesof“goodneighborhoods”thatwerewellplanned/designed,profitable

(occupied)overalong-periodoftime,andwereracially/economicallydiverse?Wednesday,September21,2016(5)UnderstandingNeighborhoodChangeA. Green,GaryP.andAnnaHaines.2008.“PhysicalCapital:TheRoleofHousinginCommunity

Development,”AssetBuildingandCommunityDevelopment(2ndEdition).ThousandOaks:SagePublications.(Canvas)

B. Mallach,A.2008.ManagingNeighborhoodChange:AFrameworkforSustainableandEquitable

Revitalization.Montclair,NJ:NationalHousingInstitute.(Canvas)

C. Schwirian,K.P.1983.“ModelsofNeighborhoodChange,”AnnualReviewofSociology,9,83–102.(Canvas&Library)

RecommendedD. GouldEllen,I.,&O’Regan,K.M.2011.HowLow-IncomeNeighborhoodsChange:Entry,Exitand

Enhancement.RegionalScienceandUrbanEconomics,41(2),89–97.DiscussionQuestions

1. Whatarethemodesofneighborhoodchange?2. Isneighborhoodchangeinevitable?3. Shouldplanners/policymakersacceptthatneighborhoodchangeisinevitableandleverageit

tosustainandreinvigorateplaces?4. Shouldplanners/policymakersworktostemorcurbneighborhoodchange?Ifso,under

whatconditions?Andhow?Monday,September26,2016(6)GentrificationA. Lees,Loretta,TomSlaterandElvinWyly.2008.“TheBirthofGentrification,”inGentrification.New

YorkandLondon:Routledge.(Canvas)B. Hwang,JackelynandJeffreyLin.2016.“WhatHaveWeLearnedAbouttheCausesofRecent

Gentrification”FederalReserveBankofPhiladelphia,ResearchDepartment.WorkingPaperSeries,PaperNo.16-20.(Canvas)

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

8

RecommendedC. Freeman,Lance.2005.“DisplacementorSuccession?ResidentialMobilityinGentrifying

Neighborhoods,”UrbanAffairsReview,40(4):463-491.(Canvas&Library)DiscussionQuestions

1. Whatisgentrification?2. Whatarethemajordebatesarounddefininggentrification?3. Isgentrificationa“consumption”oran“economic”phenomenon?4. Isthereevidencethatgentrificationcanbestalledorevenreversed?5. Shouldplanners/policymakersattempttostallgentrification?6. Isitapositivephenomenon?Or,isitathreattoaffordablehousing?

Wednesday,September28,2016(7)DefiningandUnderstandingCommunityDevelopmentA. DeFillippis,JamesandSusanSaegert.2012.“CommunitiesDevelop:TheQuestionis,How?”The

CommunityDevelopmentReader.JamesDeFilippisandSusanSaegert,editors.NewYorkandLondon:Routledge.(Canvas)

B. DeFillippis,James.2012.“CommunityControlandDevelopment:TheLongView,”TheCommunity

DevelopmentReader.JamesDeFilippisandSusanSaegert,editors.NewYorkandLondon:Routledge.(Canvas)

C. Frisch,Michael,andLisaJ.Servon.2006.“CDCsandtheChangingContextforUrbanCommunity

Development:AReviewoftheFieldandtheEnvironment.”CommunityDevelopment,37(4):88-108.(Canvas&Library)

DiscussionQuestions

1. Whatiscommunitydevelopment?2. Whataretheoriginsofthefieldofcommunitydevelopment?3. Howiscommunitydevelopmentdifferentfromneighborhoodplanning?

a. Isthedividebetweenthe“fields”beneficialtoeitherorboth?4. Whatarethemostrecenttrendsincommunitydevelopment?5. Isthereatheoryofcommunitydevelopment?

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

9

Monday,October3,2016(8)UnderstandingtheRoleofCBOs/CDCsA. Green,GaryP.andAnnaHaines.2008.“TheRoleofCommunityDevelopmentOrganizations,”

AssetBuildingandCommunityDevelopment(2ndEdition).ThousandOaks:SagePublications.(Canvas)

B. Vidal,A.C.1996.Chapter10,“CDC’sasAgentsofNeighborhoodChange:TheStateoftheArt,”in,

RevitalizingUrbanNeighborhoods,W.DennisKeating,NormanKrumholzandPhillipStar,editors.Lawrence:UniversityPressofKansas.pp.149–163.(Canvas)

C. Yin,J.1998.“TheCommunityDevelopmentIndustrySystem:ACaseStudyofPoliticsandInstitutionsinCleveland,1967–1997,”JournalofUrbanAffairs,20(2):137-157.(Canvas&Library)

DiscussionQuestions

1. Whatarecommunity-basedorganizations?Communitydevelopmentcorporations?2. WhatisthehistoricaltrajectoryofCBOsandCDCs?3. WhatarethechallengesmostCBOs/CDCsconfront?Whatisthelargestthreattotheirsurvival?4. WhatisthecurrentstateofCBOs/CDCs?5. Howareconceptssuchas“agency”and“capacity”definedintermsofCBOsandCDCs?

Wednesday,October5,2016(9)TheChallengesofCDCs:Management,ChoiceandAgencyA. Stoecker,R.1997."TheCDCModelofUrbanRedevelopment:ACritiqueandAlternative,"Journalof

UrbanAffairs,19(1):1-22.(Canvas&Library)

B. Rohe,W.andR.Bratt.2003.“Failures,Downsizings,andMergersamongCommunityDevelopmentCorporations,”HousingPolicyDebate,14(1):1-46.(Canvas&Library)

C. Bratt,R.1997.“CDCs:ContributionsOutweighContradictions,aReplytoRandyStoecker,”JournalofUrbanAffairs,19(1):23-28.(Canvas&Library)

D. Keating,W.D.(1997).“TheCDCModelofUrbanDevelopment,aReplytoRandyStoecker,”JournalofUrbanAffairs,19(1):29-33.(Canvas&Library)

RecommendedE. Thomson,DaleandHarleyF.Etienne(forthcoming)."FiscalCrisisandCommunityDevelopment:

TheGreatRecession,SupportNetworks,andCDCCapacity,"HousingPolicyDebate.(Canvas)

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

10

F. Liuo,Y.T.andR.C.Stroh.1998.“CommunityDevelopmentIntermediarySystemsintheUnitedStates:Origins,EvolutionandFunctions”HousingPolicyDebate,9(3):575-594.(Canvas

&Library)DiscussionQuestions

1. WhatarethemajordebatesaboutCDC/CBOscaleandscope?2. Whichisthestrongerargument?TheStockermodel?Bratt/Keating?3. WhatrolehaveintermediariesandsupportsystemsforCDCs/CBOsplayedintheirsuccess

and/orfailure?4. Towhatextentdoyoubelievethatnewmodelsofcommunitydevelopmentareneededin

thepost-recessionurbancontext?Monday,October10,2016(10)CommunityOrganizing,TheAmericanCity,andNeighborhoodPlanningA. DeRienzo,Harold.2008.“CommunityOrganizingforPowerandDemocracy:LessonsLearned

fromaLifeintheTrenches,”TheCommunityDevelopmentReader.JamesDeFilippisandSusanSaegert,editors.London:Routledge.(Canvas)

B. Fisher,Robert.2008.“NeighborhoodOrganizing:TheImportanceofHistoricalContext,”The

CommunityDevelopmentReader.JamesDeFilippisandSusanSaegert,editors.London:Routledge.(Canvas)

C. Warren,Mark.2008.“ATheologyofOrganizing:FromAlinskytotheModernIAF,”

TheCommunityDevelopmentReader.JamesDeFilippisandSusanSaegert,editors.London:Routledge.(Canvas)

DiscussionQuestions

1. Whatistheconnectionbetweencommunityorganizingandneighborhoodstabilization?2. Howiscommunityorganizingconnectedtocommunityagencyandcontrol?3. Iscommunityorganizingadatedconcept?Doesitneedtobereinvigoratedtomake

communitydevelopmentandneighborhood-levelplanningmoreeffectiveinanadvancedcapitalisteconomy?

4. Aretherecontemporarycasesofeffectiveorganizingthathasledtobetterneighborhoodplanning/communitydevelopmentoutcomes?

Wednesday,October12,2016(11)CommunityDevelopmentBlockGrantsA. Rohe,WilliamM.,andGeorgeC.Galster.2014.“TheCommunityDevelopmentBlockGrantProgram

Turns40:ProposalsforProgramExpansionandReform.”HousingPolicyDebate24(1):3–13.doi:10.1080/10511482.2013.865973.(Canvas&Library)

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

11

B. Holywell,Ryan.2012.“CDBGCutsEvenGreaterThanExpectedinSomePlaces,”Governing,January18,2012,http://www.governing.com/blogs/fedwatch/cdbg-cuts-even-greater-than-expected-in-some-communities.html

1. WhatisthehistoryoftheCommunityDevelopmentBlockGrantsProgram?2. Whatistheintentoftheprogram?Currentfundinglevels?3. Howdodifferentcitiesadministertheprogram?WhataretheimplicationsforCBOs/CDCs

andotherneighborhood-baseddevelopers?4. WhatarethemostconcerningaspectsoftheCDBGprogrammovingforward?

Monday,October19,2016

**NoClass–FallBreak**Wednesday,October20,2016(12)A. Sugrue,T.J.2005.“Prefacetothe2ndEdition”and“Introduction”TheOriginsoftheUrban

Crisis:RaceandInequalityinPostwarDetroit.Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress.(Canvas)B. Teitz,M.andK.Chapple.1998.“TheCausesofInner-CityPoverty:EightHypothesesinSearch

ofReality,”Cityscape:AJournalofPolicyDevelopmentandResearch,3(3):33-70.(Canvas)C. Conn,Steven.2014.“Ferguson,Philadelphia,andtheChangingGeographyofRace,”

HuffPostPolitics,http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-conn/ferguson-philadelphia-and_b_5712801.html

RecommendedD. Newman,KatheandPhilipAshton.2004.“NeoliberalUrbanPolicyandNewPathsofNeighborhood

ChangeintheAmericanInnerCity,”EnvironmentandPlanningA,36(7):1151-1172.(Canvas)DiscussionQuestions

1. WhataresomeoftheleadingargumentsthathelpexplainthedisinvestmentanddeclineorcentralcityneighborhoodsintheUnitedStatesbetweentheendofWorldWarIIandthe1990s?

2. Definerace/racism/structuralracism/institutionalracismandrelatethosedefinitionstourbanneighborhoods.

3. TowhatextentcantheWaronDrugsandmassincarcerationbeunderstoodtohaveexacerbatedconditionsincentralcityneighborhoodsafter1990?

4. DefineneoliberalismandrelatethatdefinitiontoconditionsinU.S.citiesandurbanneighborhoodsfromthe1990stothepresent.

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

12

Monday,October24,2016(13)CurrentStateofUrbanNeighborhoodsA. Sharkey,Patrick.2013.Chapters1,2&3.StuckinPlace:UrbanNeighborhoodsandtheEndof

ProgressTowardRacialEquality.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.DiscussionQuestions

1. Whatistheevidenceofresidentialandeconomicmobilityoverthepastfewdecades?2. WhydoesSharkeysuggestthatthereshouldhavebeenmoremobilitythantherehasbeen?3. HowisSharkeydefining“ghetto”?Isthisaneffectivewayofdefininghigh-poverty

neighborhoods?4. Whyhasinequalitybeensopersistentoverthepast40years?

Wednesday,October26,2016(14)A. Sharkey,Patrick.2013.Chapters4and5.StuckinPlace:UrbanNeighborhoodsandtheEndof

ProgressTowardRacialEquality.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.DiscussionQuestions

1. WhathavetheconsequencesbeenforAfricanAmericanhouseholds?2. Howhaspovertyandtheimpactsofitbeenpassedfromonegenerationtoanother?

Monday,October31,2016(15)A. Sharkey,Patrick.2013.Chapters6&7.StuckinPlace:UrbanNeighborhoodsandtheEndof

ProgressTowardRacialEquality.Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress.DiscussionQuestions

1. Whatdirection(s)doesSharkeysuggesturbanpolicymustnotturn?2. Whatroleisthereforplanners,socialworkers,anddesignersinhischargefora

reinvigoratedurbanpolicy?3. Howimportantareneighborhoodsinhisurbanpolicyscheme?

Wednesday,November2,2016HousingAffordabilityAftertheHousingCrisisA. Immergluck,Dan.2009.Chapter5Foreclosed:High-RiskLending,Deregulation,andthe

UnderminingofAmerica’sMortgageMarket.Ithaca:CornellUniversityPress.(Canvas)

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

13

B. Immergluck,Dan.2016.“AffordabilityFirst:ConcernsaboutPreservingHousingOptionsforExistingandNewResidentsonAtlanta’sWestside.WorkingPaper.GeorgiaInstituteofTechnology,SchoolofCityandRegionalPlanning.(Canvas)

C. Mara,Kevin,andDanImmergluck.2016.“PreservingAffordabilityandPreventingDisplacementinVineCityandEnglishAvenueintheFaceofMajorNeighborhoodInvestmentInitiatives:AReporttotheWestsideCommunitiesAlliance.(Canvas)

D. Hertz,Daniel.2015.“TheWayWeMeasureHousingAffordabilityisBroken,”CityCommentary.

Availableat:http://cityobservatory.org/the-way-we-measure-housing-affordability-is-broken/RecommendedE. Florida,RichardandAriaBendix.2015.“HowtoFixSanFrancisco”Availableat:

http://www.citylab.com/cityfixer/2015/12/how-to-fix-san-francisco/418329/F. Florida,Richard.2016.“HowExpensiveCitiesHurtWorkers”Availableat:

http://linkis.com/www.citylab.com/work/vZ7oD

G. Hertz,Daniel.2015.“ResidualIncome:ABetterWayofMeasuringAffordability,”CityCommentary.Availableat:http://cityobservatory.org/residual-income-a-better-way-of-measuring-affordability/

H. Hertz,Daniel.2015.“MeasuringHousingAffordability:WhatAboutHomeowners?”

CityCommentary.Availableat:http://cityobservatory.org/measuring-housing-affordability-what-about-homeowners/

DiscussionQuestions

1. Ishousingaffordabilityamyth?2. Whatistheevidenceofthelinkbetweenlanduseregulationsand/ordensityregulationsand

increasinghomevalues?3. Whatisthelinkbetweenincreasinghousingprices,theavailabilityofrentalunitsand

displacement?4. Whatarethelargerimplicationsofincreasinghousingunaffordability?5. Whataresomeofthemosteffectivetoolsplannershavetolimitincreasingunaffordability?

Monday,November7,2016(16)SupplySideRevitalizationEffortsA. Riposa,Gerry.1996.“FromEnterpriseZonestoEmpowermentZones:TheCommunityContextof

UrbanEconomicDevelopment.”AmericanBehavioralScientist39(5):536–551.(Canvas&Library)

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

14

B. Forbes,Jennifer.2006.“UsingEconomicDevelopmentProgramsasToolsforUrbanRevitalization:AComparisonofEmpowermentZonesandNewMarketsTaxCredits.”UniversityofIllinoisLawReview2006:177.(Canvas&Library)

C. Pendall,RolfandLeahHendley.2013.“ABriefLookattheEarlyImplementationofChoiceNeighborhoods.”Washington,D.C.:TheUrbanInstitute.http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/alfresco/publication-pdfs/412940-A-Brief-Look-at-the-Early-Implementation-of-Choice-Neighborhoods.PDF

DiscussionQuestions

1. WhatistheoriginandtrajectoryoftheReagan-eraEnterpriseZoneprogram?2. HowdidtheClinton-eraEmpowermentZoneprogramimproveupontheEnterpriseZone

program?Whatwerethemeasureableimpacts?Problems?3. HowdidtheObama-eraPromiseZonesfurthertheaimsoftheEnterpriseand

EmpowermentZoneprograms?Isthereevidenceoftheirimpact?4. HowhastheNewMarketTaxCredit(NMTC)programcontributedtotheoverallsuccessof

supply-sideprograms?5. Otherprogramshavemimickedtheenterprisezonemodelbutwithafocuson“innovation,”

“opportunity”andotherbuzzwords.Isthereevidenceoftheirimpact?Howhavetheycontributedtocentralcityrevitalization?Havetheycontributedtoneighborhood-levelrevitalization?

6. Isneighborhooddistress,simplyamatteroflowsupply?Wednesday,November9,2016(17)AnchorInstitutionsA. Birch,Eugenie,DavidC.Perry,andHenryL.Taylor.2013.“UniversitiesasAnchorInstitutions.”

JournalofHigherEducationOutreachandEngagement17(3):7–15.(Canvas&Library)

B. Rodin,Judith.2005.“The21stCenturyUniversity.”JournaloftheAmericanPlanningAssociation,71(3):237–249.(Canvas&Library)

C. Etienne,HarleyF.2012.Chapters1and2.PushingBacktheGates:NeighborhoodPerspectiveson

University-DrivenRevitalization.Philadelphia:TempleUniversityPress.(Canvas)

DiscussionQuestions

1. Whatisthecentralargumentofanchorinstitutionledrevitalization?2. Isthereevidencethatanchorinstitutionsarebetterpositionedtoleadneighborhood-level

revitalizationefforts?3. Isitusefultoconsidertheimplicationsofclient/visitorfocusedneighborhood-level

revitalizationefforts?4. Isthereevidenceofanchorinstitutionled,equitabledevelopment?Aretherebestcases?

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

15

Monday,November14,2016(19)WorkforceandEconomicDevelopmentPlanningforStrongNeighborhoodsA. Schrock,Greg.2014.“ConnectingPeopleandPlaceProsperityWorkforceDevelopmentandUrban

PlanninginScholarshipandPractice.”JournalofPlanningLiterature29(3):257–271.(Canvas&Library)

B. GreenLeigh,NanceyandEdwardBlakely.2013.“Chapter6:LocalEconomicDevelopmentStrategy,”

and“Chapter10:HumanResourceDevelopment.”InPlanningLocalEconomicDevelopment.FifthEdition.ThousandOaks:SagePublications.(Canvas)

RecommendedC. GreenLeigh,NanceyandEdwardBlakely.2013.“Chapter8:LocalityDevelopment,”and“Chapter9:

BusinessDevelopment.”InPlanningLocalEconomicDevelopment.FifthEdition.ThousandOaks:SagePublications.(Canvas)

DiscussionQuestions

1. Whatarethemajorfederalworkforcedevelopmentprograms?2. WhatisthecurrentstatusofU.S.workforcedevelopmentprograms?3. Canentrepreneurialismandsmallbusinessdevelopmentsaveurbanneighborhoodsand

creategreaterprosperityacrossmetropolitanregions?Wednesday,November16,2016(20)SchoolsasEssentialComponentsofGoodNeighborhoodsA. Warren,Mark.R.2014.“PublicSchoolsasCentersforBuildingSocialCapitalinUrbanCommunities,”

SchoolsandUrbanRevitalization:RethinkingInstitutionsandCommunityDevelopment.KellyL.PattersonandRobertM.Silverman,editors.NewYork:Routledge.(Canvas)

B. McKoy,D.andJ.Vincent.2008.“Chapter4HousingandEducation:TheInextricableLink,”

Segregation:TheRisingCostsforAmerica.JamesH.CarrandNandineeK.Kutty,editors.NewYork:Routledge.(Canvas)

C. Horsford,SonyaDouglass,andCarrieSampson.2014.“PromiseNeighborhoodsThePromiseand

PoliticsofCommunityCapacityBuildingasUrbanSchoolReform.”UrbanEducation49(8):955–991.(Canvas&Library)

RecommendedD. Hopson,Rodney.2014.“WhyAreStudiesofNeighborhoodsandCommunitiesCentraltoEducation

PolicyandReform?”UrbanEducation,49(8):

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

16

DiscussionQuestions

1. Areschoolstrulyessentialto“goodneighborhoods”?Isthelinktruly“inextricable”?2. Wouldschoolsbelessimportanttoneighborhoodplacemakingandperceivedneighborhood

qualityifthedominantschoolfundingandgovernanceparadigmweredifferent?3. Shouldplannersbemoreconcernedwiththecurrentstateofpubliceducation?Particularly

inlegacycitiessuchasDetroit,Philadelphia,Chicagoandothers?Monday,November21,2016(21)CreatingHousingAffordabilitythroughBenefitsAgreements,LandTrusts,REITs,andLandBanksA. Baxamusa,M.2008.“EmpoweringCommunitiesthroughDeliberation:TheModelof

CommunityBenefitsAgreements,”JournalofPlanningEducationandResearch,27(3):261-276.(Canvas&Library)

B. Salkin,P.andA.Lavine.2008.“NegotiatingforSocialJusticeandthePromiseofCommunity

BenefitsAgreements:CaseStudiesofCurrentandDevelopingAgreements,”JournalofAffordableHousingandCommunityDevelopmentLaw,17:113-129.(Canvas&Library)

C. Alexander,FrankS.2008.LandBankingasMetropolitanPolicy.Washington,DC:TheBrookings

Institution,MetropolitanPolicyProgram.(Canvas)D. Abello,OscarPerry.2016.“TheseNeighborsGotTiredofWaitingforTraditionalDevelopers”

NextCity,https://nextcity.org/daily/entry/cooperative-commercial-real-estate-development-minneapolis

RecommendedE. Greenstein,R.,andY.Sungu-Eryilmaz.2007.“CommunityLandTrusts:ASolutionforPermanently

AffordableHousing,”in,LandLines(January).Cambridge,Mass.:LincolnInstituteofLandPolicy.(Canvas&Library)

Wednesday,November23,2016 **NoClass–ThanksgivingRecess**

Monday,November28,2016(22)EvaluatingCommunityDevelopmentA. Baum,Howell.2001.“HowShouldWeEvaluateCommunityInitiatives?”Journalofthe

AmericanPlanningAssociation,67(2):147-158.(Canvas&Library)

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

17

B. Green,JohnJ.andAnnaM.Kleiner.2011.“ActionResearchandEvaluationinCommunityDevelopment,”IntroductiontoCommunityDevelopment:Theory,Practice,andService-Learning.ThousandOaks:SagePublications.(Canvas)

DiscussionQuestions

1. Canandshouldcommunitydevelopmentinitiativesbeevaluatedthewaypolicyanalystswouldevaluateotherprograms(e.g.cost-benefit,administrativeoperabilityand/orcapacity,economicimpacts?)

2. Arethereeffectiveexamplesofcommunitydevelopmentevaluationsthatlookbeyondcost-benefitanalyses?

3. Areaction-researchbasedapproachesanappropriatesolution?Whatarethedrawbacks?

Wednesday,November30,2016(23)UsingCensusData/MapstoEvaluateNeighborhoodDynamicsA. DataDrivenDetroit.(n.d.)CommunityProfiles:MasterPlanningNeighborhoodsofDetroit.

Availableat:http://www.cridata.org/Neighborhoods_Detroit.aspx?tmplt=D3(Lookatfive(5)neighborhoodprofilesandmakenoteofwhatcategoriesofdataarepresent.)

B. FurmanCenterforRealEstateandUrbanPolicy.2010.StateoftheCity’sHousingand

Neighborhoods.Availableat:http://furmancenter.org/research/sonychan/2010-report/(Pleaseseetheone-pageneighborhoodprofilesatthebottomofthepage.)

C. Few,S.2009.StatisticalNarrative:TellingCompellingStorieswithNumbers.VisualBusiness

IntelligenceNewsletter.http://www.perceptualedge.com/articles/visual_business_intelligence/statistical_narrative.pdf

D. ZipCodeandCountyBusinessPatterns

http://www.census.gov/econ/cbp/E. LongitudinalHousingandEmploymentHousingDynamics

http://lehd.ces.census.gov/applications/help/onthemap.html#!getting_startedMonday,December5,2016(24)StrategiesforEngagementandOutreachforNeighborhoodPlanningA. Arnstein,Sherry.1969.“ALadderofCitizenParticipation.”JournaloftheAmericanInstituteof

Planners(JAPA),35(4):216-224.(Canvas&Library)

B. CanadianWindEnergyAssociation.(n.d.).BestPracticesforCommunityEngagementandPublicConsultation.(Canvas)

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

18

C. Cogan,E.2000.Chapter2,“DifferentTypesofPublicMeetings,pp.11-34.SuccessfulPublicMeetings:APracticalGuideforManagersinGovernment.SanFrancisco:Jossey-BassPublishers.(Canvas)

Wednesday,December7,2016(25)**LastClassSession**Monday,December12,2016(26)NoClass–ClassCancelled

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

19

WritingTips1. Avoidpedanticjargon:"timeframe"or"timeperiod"for"time","methodology"for

"method","explicate"for"explain","secondly"for"second","importantly"for"important",or"parameter","matrix",etc.,unlessyouusethemtechnically.

2.Avoidcolloquialismssuchas"needtobe"(for"mustbe"),"intermsof,""indepth."3.Avoidusing"dueto"asaprepositionalphrase.e.g.:Duetothecoldweather,Idecidedto

stayhome.4.Donotuse"isn't","can't",andothercontractionsinwritingsasformalastermpapers.5.Donotsplitinfinitivesunlessnotsplittingthemresultsinveryawkwardphrasing:write"to

understandthepointbetter,"not"tobetterunderstandthepoint."Anexampleshowingwhereitisacceptable:"Icannotbringmyselftoreallylikethefellow."

6.Don'tusedanglingparticiples:i.e.,"Whilevisiting(theauthor)withMrs.Jonesatherhome,

she(Mrs.Jones)reiteratedthat..."or"Inassumingthatintegrationisdesirable,itisnecessarytoconsider..."Thepersonwhoistheimpliedsubjectoftheparticipialphrasemustalsobethesubjectoftheverbthatfollows.

7.Avoidusingthepassive.Itmakesforclumsinessand,mostimportant,introducesambiguity

bynotstatingwhodidtheact.It'slikesaying,"Itwasdropped,"insteadof:"Idroppedit,"or"Itwaslost,"for"Ilostit."

8."'s"usuallyindicatesthepossessive.Therefore,donotwrite"TDR's"or"the1960's"unless

youmeanbelongingtotheTDRorbelongingto1960.Theexceptionis"it's"whichisnotapossessive,butisacontractionof"itis."("It'stoolate.")Thepossessiveofitis"its."("Thecatlickeditspaw.")

9.Avoidusingstringsofnounsasadjectives.Write"thefeasibilityofdowntownrenewal"

insteadof"downtownrenewalfeasibility."10.Makesurethesubjectandtheverbarebothsingularorbothplural:"Theresultofthe

electionsis(notare)important..."Also,"criterion"issingular;"criteria,"plural;"data"isplural;"none"issingular:("Noneofthefederallawshasbeeneffective...")Makesurepronounsaretherightnumber:"Allcitizensmustguardtheir(nothis)rights."Alsonote:"Eachofthecitizensmustguardhis(her)(not"their")Rights."

11.Useabbreviationscorrectly,especiallyofLatinphrases.Notethat"i.e."standsforidest

andmeans"thatis";"e.g."standsforexempligratiaandmeans"forexample".And"etal.”(standsforetaliiandmeaning"andothers")requiresaperiod.Ingeneral,considerusingtheEnglishphrasesinsteadofthepedanticLatinabbreviations.

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

20

12.DonotuseZIPCODEabbreviationsinformalwriting.e.g.:writeMass.,notMA,andN.J.,not

NJ.13.Putcommasbetweenallitemsinaseries.i.e.:A,B,C,D,andE.ThislookslikeA+B+C+D+E,

orfiveseparateitems,asintended.If,however,youwriteA,B,C,DandE,itlookslikeA+B+C+(DandE),orfourseparateitems.Considerthefollowingseriesoffiveitems:offices,factories,schools,hotels,andmotels.Thecommabeforethe"and"makesitclearthathotelsandmotelsareseparateitems.Ifyouomitthefinalcomma,asmanywritersdo,thenthereisconfusionaboutwhethertherearefourorfiveitems.

14.If,infact,youconsiderhotelsandmotelstomakeuponecategory,thenwrite:offices,

factories,schools,andhotelsandmotels.15.Makesureyouuse"effect"and"affect,”and"principle"and"principal,"correctly.16.Checkouttheproperuseof"that"and"which.”Whenaclausedefinesorlimitsanoun,

use"that:""Iheardthedogthatwasbarking."(i.e.,thatdog,notanyotherdog).Whenaclauseonlyaddsinformationorisalmostanasideoranafterthought,andisnotnecessarytostatethecentralpointofthesentence,use"which:""Isleptlate,whichturnedouttohavebeenafortunatething."Otherexamples:

"Eachonemadealistofbooksthathadinfluencedher.”(i.e.,thatparticularclassofbooks)"Ialwaysbuyherbooks,whichiswhyI'mawareoftheirincreasedcost.”(i.e.,not

distinguishingherbooksfromallothers,butsimplyaddingamerefactaboutthem).

17.Whenindoubtaboutproperusage,consultsomewell-recognizedsource,suchas:

StrunkandWhite,TheElementsofStyle,NewYork:Macmillan,or

TheUniversityofChicagoPress,AManualofStyle,Chicago:TheUniversityofChicagoPress.18.Becarefulnottoruntwosentencestogether,connectedby“however.”Inmostcases,

“However”shouldstartanewsentence.19.Putpunctuationinsidequotationmarks.i.e.:JusticeBrownconcluded,“Thisdecision

furtherreaffirmsthecourt’scommitmenttotheprotectionofprivateproperty.”

UP/SW655–NEIGHBORHOODPLANNING--FALL2016

21

20.Don’tuse“intermsof.”Rephrasethesentencetoincorporatewhatwouldotherwisefollow“intermsof”asanintegralpartofthesentence.Usually,useofthephrasemeansthatthewriterhasnotthoughtthroughwhatheorshewantstosay,buthassimplytackedonthequalifierattheend.

21.Lastlyandmostimportantly--Alwaysproofreadyourpaperbeforehandingitin.

Typographicalerrorscanconfuseyourreadersandwilladverselyaffectyourgrade.