0337

County of Santa CruzHEALTH SERVICES AGENCY

POST OFFICE BOX 962, 1080 EMELINE AVE., SANTA CRUZ, CA 95061-0962TELEPHONE: (831) 454-4000 FAX: (831) 454-4770 TOO: (831) 454-4123

HEALTH SERVICES AGENCYADMINISTRATION

September 9, 2013 AGENDA: September 24,2013

BOARD OF SUPERVISORSCounty of Santa Cruz701 Ocean StreetSanta Cruz, CA 95060

SUBJECT: Approval of California Office of Traffic Safety Grant Agreement

Dear Members of the Board:

The Health Services Agency (HSA) requests your Board's approval of the attached revenueagreement with State of California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS), for an awarded competitivegrant in the amount of $150,000, for provision of traffic safety education services to reducedistracted driving.

Cell phone use and texting while driving, particularly among teenage and young adult drivers,has caused an alarming new public health threat. HSA and its local traffic safety partners willwork together to reduce distracted and impaired driving, with particular focus on teen drivers.Local injury/fatality data and observation survey results also support increased efforts to reachpedestrians and bicyclists through innovative approaches to reduce injuries and fatalities amongnon-motorist road users. Under the grant, staff will promote compliance with California trafficsafety laws, best practices, and work with schools to provide child safety seats, bike helmets,and other safety equipment.

The term of the competitive grant, titled Safety Education Project: End Distracted Driving,begins October 1, 2013 and continues through September 30, 2014. Sufficient funds exist withinthe fiscal year (FY) 2013-14 budget to fund these grant activities.

It is, therefore, RECOMMENDED that your Board approve the attached revenue agreement withthe California Office of Traffic Safety, Contract R954, in the amount of $150,000, for competitivegrant funded traffic safety education services to reduce distracted driving, and authorize theHealth Services Agency Director to sign.

Sincerely, Recommended:

~~.i~Health Services Agency Director

~Susan A. MaurielloCounty Administrative Officer

Attachments: ADM-29; Agreement

36

COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZREQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT

0338

TO. Board of SupervisorsCounty Administrative OffceAuditor Controller

FROM: (Department)

(Signature) i .7. I J(Date)

ifies that appropriations/revenues are availableBY:

Signatu

AGREEMENT TYPE (Check One) Expenditure Agreement 0 Revenue Agreement ¡g

The Board of Supervisors is hereby requested to approve the attached agreement and authorize the execution of same.

1. Said agreement is between the Health Services Agency - Public Health

and California Office of Traffc Safety, 2208 Kausen Drive, Suite 300, Elk Grove, CA 95758

(DepartmenUAgency)

(Name/Address)

2. The agreement will provide traffic safety education services to reduce distracted driving.

3. Period of the agreement is from October 1, 2013

4. Anticipated Cost Is $ Revenue of $150,000

to September 30,2014

o Fixed 0 Monthly Rate 0 Annual Rate 0 Not to Exceed

Remarks:

5. Detail: 0 On Continuing Agreements List for FY _-_ Page CC-o Section II No Board letter required, will be listed under Item 8

o Section ILL Board letter requiredo Section IV Revenue Agreement

6. Appropriations/Revenues are available and are budgeted in 362800

Contract, No: OR ~ 1 st Time Agreement

(Index) 873 (Sub object)

NOTE: IF APPROPRIATIONS ARE INSUFFICIENT, ATIACHED COMPLETED AUD-74 OR AUD-60

.,~~~-'~Appropriations available and ~. encumbered.

will be

Contract No: R954--l;-~-- / '.dy: ~~i',d~-Auditor- "tro rD

D,te 'l-'7-l'3are not

Proposal and accounting detail reviewed and approved. It is recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve the agreement and authorize

Health Services Agency Director(DepUAgency Head) to execute on behalf of the

Health Services Agency

~ \'1\.,11Date: D-(DepartmenUAgency)

Distribution:Board of Supervisors - WhiteAuditor Controller - CanaryAuditor-Controller - PinkDepartment - Gold

State of CaliforniaCounty of Santa CruzI ex-offcio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Santa Cruz,

State of California, do hereby certify that the foregoing request for approval of agreement was ap-proved by said Board of Supervisors as recommended by the County Administrative Offce by anorder duly entered in the minutes of said Board on 20

ADM - 29 (8/01)Title i, Section 300 Proc Man By: Deputy Clerk

AUDiTOR-CONTROLLER USE ONLY

CODocument No.

$

JE Amount Lines HITL Keyed By Date

TC110

3 6ditor Description

$Amount Index

/Sub object User Code

~ø(J~0339

State of California - Offce of Traffc SafetyGRANT NUMBERGRANT AGREEMENT - Page i

OPl406OTS-38 (Rev 6(3)

tJj . /1. GRA..NT TITLE y. Ofea of th COTRAFIC SAFETY EDUC ATION PROJECT: END DISTRACTED DRivm~

2. NAI\IF. OF ApPLICANT A(;ENCY4. GR,,"T PERIOD;County of Santa Cniz

3. A(;ENry UNIT TO HANDLE GRANT From: 10íl/13Public Health Department To: 9/30/14

5. GRANT DESCRIPTION

Cell phone use and texting while driving, particularly among teenage and young adult drivers, has caused an alanllingnew public health threat. Santa Cniz County Health Services Agency and its local traffc safety partners will worktogether to reduce distracted and impaired driving, with paiiicular focus on teen drivers. Local injury/fatality data andobservation survey results also support increased efforts to reach pedestrians and bicyclists through innovative approachesto reduce injuries and fatalities"among non-motorist road users. OTS grant staff will promote compliance with CA traffcsafety laws, best practices and work with schools to provide child safety seats, bike helmets and other safety equipment.

6. FEDERAL FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED: $ 150,000.007. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following which are by this

· Schedule A (OTS-38b) - Problem Statement, Goals and .

Objectives and Method of Procedure· Schedule B (OTS-38d) - Detailed Budget Estimate and

Sub-Budget Estimate (if applicable)· Schedule B-1 (OTS-38t) - Budget Narrative and Sub-

Budget Narrative (if applicable)

*Items shown with an asterisk (*), are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement as if attached hereto.

These documents can be viewed at the OTS home web page under Grants: www.ots.ca.gov.

1 c.~'..J. ~..i.\"~ ~:.:i;:~1- .. l=..~it o.~ tne ./\!.';ie~incnt:

.

Schedule C (OTS-38g) - Quarterly Evaluation Data Fonn(if applicable)Exhibit A -Certifications and AssurancesExhibit B* - OTS Grant Program Manual.

We, the officials named below, hereby swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that we are dulyauthorized to legally bind the Grant recipient to the above described Grant terms and conditions.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto.

8. ApPROVAL SIGNATURES

A. GRANT DIRECTOR

NAME Dena Loijos PHONE: 831.454.5018

TITLE: 831.454.5048FAX:

ADDRESS:

Health Services Manager

Health Services Agency1070 Emeline AvenueSanta Cruz, CA 95060

dena.loij os@health.co.santa-cruz.ca.usE-MAIL:

(Sign(ll/r(!)

C. FISCAL OR ACCOLNTING OFFICIAL

NA\lE Michael Beaton

(Date)

PHONE 831.454.4449

TITLE: Director of AdministrativeServicesHealth Services Agencyi 080 Emeline AvenueSanta Cruz, CA 95060

Michael. Beaton@co.santa-cruz.ca.us

FAX 83 i .454.4770

ADDRESS

E-M.~IL:

(Signl/rl/rei (Daie)

B. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL OF ApPLICANT AGENCY

NAME: Giang Nguyen PHONE: 831.454.4324

831.454.4770FAX:

TITLE:HSA Director

Health Services Agency1080 Emeline AvenueSanta Cruz, CA 95060

E-MAIL: Giang.Nguyen@co.santa-cniz.ca.us

ADDRESS:

(Signature)D. OFFICE AUTHORIZED To RECEIVE PAY\-IENTS

NA\IE Health Services Agency

ADDRESS i 080 Emeline Avenue

Santa Cruz, CA 95060

(Date)

9. DUNS NUMBER

DUNS #: 168691095

RICdSTFREI 1080 Emeline AvenueADIJRfSS & Santa Cruz, CA 95060

ZIP: R.-00

SCHEDULE AGRAT No. OP1406

GRAT DESCRITIONPAGE 1, revised 7/15/13

0340

PROBLEM STATEMENT

Santa Cruz County has over 600 miles of major county roadways and 160 miles of highways that link the citiesof Watsonville, Capitola, Santa Cruz, and Scotts Valley with its unincorporated areas. OTS has designated

highways 17 and 129 as Highway Traffic Safety Corridors due to the high rate of deaths and injuries.

Santa Cruz County Traffic Collsion Fatality/Injury Trends, Federal Fiscal Years 2009-2011

151,237 1,150 1,147

1,485

175 173 8 216 166

HBD Driver 0:21 yrs 26 2 32 24 0 25 . 35 34

HBD Driver 0:21-34 92 4 63 92 4 62 77 50

#1 Speed 364 8 497 354 1 485 395 1 524

#2 Alcohol Involved 175 11 206 173 8 216 166 2 204

#3- Nighttime 176 8 208 158 2 200 141 3 171

Source: SWITRS OTS Data Categories

Motor Vehicle Occupant Injury and Fatality Age Patterns:

SWITRS data for years 2009 - 2011 indicated that two youth under age 19 years died and another 449 wereinjured due to motor vehicle collisions on Santa Cruz County's roadways.

SWITRS Motor Vehicle Occupants Kiled and Injured under 19 Years of Age, Years 2009 - 2011

Age Groups Fatal VictimsPercentage Injury Percentage of Total Victims

of Fatalities Victims Injuries Fatal & Injury

birth-3 years 0 0 29 c:1% 28

4-8 years 0 0 58 1.4% 54

9-13 years 0 0 81 1.9% 75

14-18 years 2 5.9% 322 7.6% 324

TOTAL :- 19 yrs 2 5.9% 490 11.6% 492

Source: SWITRS

:-8b (Rev. 6/13)

SCHEDULE AGRAT No. OP1406

GRAT DESCRITIONPAGE 2, revised 7/15/13

0341

OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFET - 2010 RANKINGS

The OTS Rankings provide individual cities a way to compare their citys traffic safety statistics to those ofother cities with similar-sized populations. Cities can use these comparisons to see what traffic safety areasthey may have problems in and which they were doing well in. Identifying emerging or on-going traffic safetyproblem areas help cities plan how to combat the problems. It should be noted that OTS rankings are only

indicators of potential problems; there are many factors that may either understate or overstate acity/county ranking that must be evaluated based on local circumstances.

The OTS Rankings are determined by the following: (1) Victim and collision data for the rankings is taken fromthe latest available California Highway Patrol (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS)data; (2) Victim and collision rankings are based on rates of victims killed and injured or fatal and injurycollisions per "1,000 daily-vehicle-miles-of-travel" (Caltrans data) and per "1,000 average population"

(Department of Finance data) figures. This more accurately ensures proper weighting and comparisons whenpopulations and daily vehicle miles traveled vary; (3) DUI arrest totals and rankings are calculated for citiesonly and are based on rates of non-CHP DUI arrests (Department of Justice data). This is so that localjurisdictions can see how their own efforts are working; and (4) Counties are assigned statewide rankings,while cities are assigned population group ran kings.

NOTE: City rankings are for incorporated cities only. County Rankings include all roads - state, county andlocal- and all jurisdictions - CHP, Sheriff, Police and speciaL. ors Rankings are calculated so that the higherthe number of victims or collisions per 1000 residents in a population group, the higher the ranking. Number1 in the rankings is the highest, or "worst." So, for Group B, a ranking of 1/53 is the highest or worst, 27/53 isaverage, and 53/53 is the lowest or best. The same methodology also applies for DUI arrest rankings.

OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY - 2010 RANKINGS

AGENCY

Santa Cruz County

NCIC COUNTY

4400 SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

OVMT

6,442,346

TYPE OF COLLISION

Total Fatal and Injury.......................

Alcohol Involved..............................HBD Driver -c21..................................

HBO Driver 21-34...............................Motorcyclists ....................................Pedestrians...............................................PedestriansPedestriansBicyclists....................................................Bicyclists

GROUP POPULATION (AVG)

263,491

VICTIMSKILLEO ANO

INJURED

. RAKING BYOAiL Y VEHICLE

MILES TRAVELEO

RAKING BYAVERAGE

POPULATION

1,457

198

17

79

113

82

17

4

148

11

23/58

18/58

27/58

12/58

32/5811/58

11/58

38/58

2/5823/58

43/58

30/58

36/58

24/5821/5812/58

16/58

39/58

5/5826/58

Composite ...........................................................................

Speed Related..................................Nighttime...........................................Hit and Run........................................

OTS-38b (Rev. 6/13)

COLLISIONS

375154

106

10/58

9/587/58

22/5820/58

8/58

8t1

0342SCHEDULE A

GRAT No. OP1406GRAT DESCRITION

PAGE 3, revised 7/15/13

Distracted Driving

The proliferation of cell phone usage and texting while driving has caused an alarming new public healththreat. In response to this trend, OTS created a 1 ih "challenge area" in 2010 dedicated to combatingdistracted driving. The Fatal Analysis Reporting System (FARS) reported that at least 20% of the 1,517,000injury crashes that occurred in the U.S.A. in 2009 involved distracted driving. The National Safety Councilestimated the rate as even higher: 25% of injury crashes nationwide in 2008 were linked to talking on a cellphone and an additional 3% were linked to texting.

Crash data from 2010 released by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) found that3,092 people were killed and 416,000 were injured in crashes caused by distracted driving.

Fatal Crashes, Drivers in Fatal Crashes, and Fatalities, 2010 (NHTSA)

Total 30,196 44,440 32,885

DistractionAffected

2,843

(9% of total crashes)

2,912

(7% of total drivers)

3,092

(9% of total fatalities)

Drivers who use hand-held devices are four times as likely to get into crashes serious enough to cause injury

(Insurance Institute for Highway Safety). Use of a hand-held or even hands-free cell phone while driving, hasbeen shown to significantly delay a driver's reactions, comparable to having a blood alcohol concentration atthe legal limit of .08 percent (University of Utah). Drivers under the age of 20 years represent the highestproportion of distracted drivers involved in fatal crashes-ll% and 19% of those were distracted specificallyby cell-phone use. (NHTSA).

In Santa Cruz County, CHP officers issued more than 12,700 distracted driving related citations during the five-year period of 2008 and 2012 (citations data from the four city police departments not available). There was athree-fold increase in citations during that time period. The vast majority of citations were issued to driverswho were talking on a "no hands-free" cell phone but citations for texting are also on the increase.

Citations for Distracted Driving, Santa Cruz County, 2008 through November 2012

Year Talking on Cell Phone- 0( 18 yrs use of wireless Texting and TotalNo hands-free device phone/ hands-free device Driving

2008 1146 6 0 1152

2009 2468 14 20 2502

2010 2471 4 40 2515

2011 2917 9 119 3045

2012 3308 13 178 3499

Total 12,310 46 357 12,713

Source California Highway Patrol, Santa Cruz Area 9720

368b (Rev. 6/13)

SCHEDULE AGRAT No. OP1406

GRAT DESCRITIONPAGE 4, revised 7/15/13

0343

Santa Cruz County had over 1,000 collisions related to in'attention from 2007 to 2011, resulting in twofatalities. Available data indicate an increasing trend in non-fatal injuries caused by distracted driving.

Distracted Driving Related Collsions and Victims, Santa Cruz County, 2007 through July 2011

Collsion Total Fatal Injury Property Damage KiledYear Collsions Collsions Collsions Only Collsions Victims Injured Victims

2007 291 0 90 201 0 127

2008 237 1 77 159 1 109

2009 233 0 100 133 0 133

2010 266 0 120 146 0 147*

2011 149 1 76 72 1 n/a

TOTAL 1,176 2 503 711 2 516** Injured Victims data through March 2010, Source: California Highway Patrol, Santa Cruz Area 9720

Friday Night Live Youth statewide conducted a "Roadwatch" campaign to capture a snapshot of distracteddriving behaviors in their community. In 2012, students monitoring nearly 70 intersections near high schoolsin 26 counties across the state for a one-hour period of time reported more than 7,000 cases of distracteddriving. This hourly avera.ge of approximately 100 cases of distracted driving per intersection is consistentwith the average recorded during last year's study. Traffic volume is not factored. Santa Cruz County studentsparticipated in the Roadwatch campaign by observing and tallying motorist behaviors near six schools sites forone hour prior to the start of the school day. Observers documented 645distracted driving behaviors in 2011and 489 in 2012.

Distracted Driving Activities, Roadwatch Santa Cruz County, 2011-2012

2011 2012

Driver Activity Count=645 % Count=489 %

Eating/Drinking 239 37 200 41

Talking on Phone 138 21 72 15

Texting 74 11 66 13

Grooming 40 6 49 10

Loud Radio 26 4 29 6

Pet In Lap 58 9 13 3

Wearing Headphones 15 2 16 3

Smoking 20 3 2 c:1

Reading 14 2 2 c:1

Talking to Passengers 13 2 0 0

Other or Multiple Activities 8 1 40 8

Source: Santa Cruz County Friday Night Live Partnership

OTS-38b (Rev. 6/13) 86

SCHEDULE AGRAT No. OP1406

GRAT DESCRIPTIONPAGE 5, revised 7/15/13

0344

Although the distractions of eating, grooming, etc. have always been present, the advent of cell phones (90%of Americans own cell phones), the proliferation of texting (text messaging has increased 10,000-fold in 10years) and the burgeoning increase in the use of GPS systems in cars have created a new and seriouscomplexity to the meaning of 'Distracted Driver'. Distracted driving is a relatively new phenomenon requiringinnovative approaches that focus in particular on young drivers to deter this dangerous behavior.

ALCOHOL AND DRUG PREVENTION - TEEN/YOUNG ADULT TRAFFIC SAFET

A total of 1,425 victims were killed or injured in FFY 2011 due to traffic collisions in Santa Cruz County,reflecting a 5% decrease from FFY 2010. Alcohol-involved injuries and fatalities also declined from 224 in FFY2010 to 206 in FFY 2011 in the county, reflecting an 8% decrease. However, injuries among drivers under 21years who had been drinking (HBD) increased from 25 in FFY 2010 to 34 in FFY 2011, which was a 36%increase. In addition, the proportion of alcohol-involved injuries/deaths that occurred in Santa Cruz Countycrashes involving HBD teen and young adult drivers increased from 40% in FFY 2010 to 41% in FFY 2011. The

California Teen Safe Driving Coalition ranked Santa Cruz County among its "Top 20" counties for teen driverinjuries. Preliminary injury/fatality data from CHP indicated that 20% of collisions were DUI-related in 2012.The California Healthy Kids Survey showed the percentage of Santa Cruz County ih grade youth who hadridden in a car with a HBD driver increased from 44% in 2005 to 53% in 2009. This number decreased to 49%in 2011, but 14% of this number reported riding with an HBD driver 7 or more times. Among 9th graders

surveyed the percentage who had driven after drinking or with a HBD driver increased from 21% in 2005 to27% in 2009, but decreased to 22% in 2011. Among 11th graders surveyed the percentage who had drivenafter drinking or with a HBD driver increased from 21% in 2005 to 27% in 2009 and increased to 34% in 2011.Proportionately more ih, 9th and 11th grade respondents in 2009-2011 in Santa Cruz County reported that

alcohol is easy to obtain (31%, 69% and 78% respectively) compared to respondents statewide (34%, 60% and73%).

The National College Health Assessment (NCHA) conducted at University of California at Santa Cruz (UCSC) in2010 indicated a decline in these behaviors among college students, but still of concern is that 2% reporteddriving after having five or more drinks in the last 30 days and 30% reported driving after having any alcoholin the last 30 days. When asked about behavior within the last 12 months, 84% reported most of the time oralways using a designated driver when they partied. Under-aged UCSC students have reported that the mostcommon methods of obtaining alcohol were self-purchase at stores (34%), purchased by older youth or adults(28%), and at bars or restaurants (27%).

Santa Cruz County contains many elements that increase local binge drinking among youth and adults,including a tourist economy, an over-concentration of alcohol outlets, and the presence of a UC campus,areas of extreme economic deprivation, and numerous secluded, high-risk settings. The 2001 CaliforniaDepartment of Health Services report entitled Prevalence of Binge Drinking in California Counties identifiedSanta Cruz County as the sixth worst county for binge drinking among residents aged 18 to 34 years. Localprevalence rates for binge drinking and problem alcohol use are consistently higher than statewidecomparison data.

S ITS-38b (Rev. 6/13)

SCHEDULE AGRAT No. OP1406

GRAT DESCRITIONPAGE 6, revised 7/15/13

0345

The number of alcohol outlets available to a community directly impacts the level of access to alcohol, theability to monitor and limit youth access, and normalization of alcohol use. Santa Cruz County had a total of707 alcohol outlets in 2011. The county's per capita rate of 2.7 per 1,000 in 2011 was 29% higher than theState average of 2.1. Youth accessibility to alcohol through merchants, parents and social host providers, incombination with a low level of traffic safety education, have become a significant public health and safetyissue in Santa Cruz County.

Numbers and Rates of Retail Alcohol Outlets

Indicator

Retail Alcohol Outlets - Santa Cruz Co 634 634 631 638 647 689 707 11.5%

Retail Alcohol Outlets - California 68,072 68,953 69,891 70,813 71,087 76,818 79,298 16.5%

Outlets per 1,000 People - Santa Cruz Co 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.5 2.7 12.5%

Outlets per 1,000 People - California 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 16.7%

Source: California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 2011

California Highway Patrol Captain Matt Olson reported in December 2012, that marijuana-impaired driverscaused 70% of local roadway fatalities. Marijuana impairment is now killing more Santa Cruz motorists thanalcohoL. Of eight fatal collisions in the county in 2012, and six of those were caused by impaired drivers, andmarijuana factored in five of those crashes, according to toxicology results. A Canadian research study at theDalhousie University in Canada, found that drivers who had used marijuana within three hours of driving hadnearly double the risk of causing a crash as those not under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

The Seven Challenges Alcohol and Drug early intervention survey, (200 respondents grades 9-12,2010-2011), reported in the past six months, 37.8% rode with a HBD driver, and, 65.2% reported riding withsomeone who had been using marijuana or other drugs. Additionally, 26.9% reported driving a car under theinfluence of marijuana or other drugs compared to 12.2% reported driving under the influence of alcohoL.This alarming data indicates Santa Cruz County youth are participating in drugged driving at rates substantiallyhigher than those driving under the influence of alcohoL. Accessibility of marijuana and prescription drugsplays a key factor.

In 2012, Santa Cruz County Community Prevention Partners (SCCCPP) conducted a series of 100 one-to- oneinterviews with community members who indicated that it is "easier" for youth to access marijuana in SantaCruz County than alcohoL. When asked how and where youth are accessing marijuana, 37.8% said fromfriends, 36.5% from dealers and 25.61% from local grow operations. Quotes included: "Marijuana is very easyto get", "not prosecuted", "socially acceptable" "parents would rather have you smoke than drink", "lessdangerous" and has fewer side effects." The NCHA 2010 survey indicated that 34.6% of students usedmarijuana in the past 30 days but "perceived" that 94% of students used marijuana in the last 30 days. TheSanta Cruz County 2009-2011 CHKS yth, 9th and 11th grade students indicated that they used marijuana in thepast 30 days (10%, 23% and 30% respectively) compared to respondents statewide (6%, 15% and 21%). In

OTS-38b (Rev. 6/13) 86

SCHEDULE AGRAT No. OP1406

GRAT DESCRIPTIONPAGE 7, revised 7/15/13

0346

addition, the perception of none to moderate harm of smoking marijuana once or twice a week is muchgreater among county 9th and 11th grade students (62%/65%) than the statewide comparison (50%/56%).

Social acceptability and low perception of harm have been barriers to addressing this issue, as evidenced bythe 2012 Community Assessment Project report in which 50% of respondents considered recreationalmarijuana use acceptable, compared to only 44% in 2007.

. ," . " .-

...nn...', .

- ,......

',.,:':' .. \'

. . :"'.

.......: .- ,"

. . ........ --Indicator LUU.: ~ inc.~--'" , . ' ", .

Community Acceptance ofMarijuana Use for Recreational/ 48% 50% 49% 55% 53% 44% 44% 50%Non-Medicinal Use

Very Acceptable 24% 28% 26% 33% 29% 17% 13% 13%

Somewhat Acceptable 25% 22% 23% 22% 23% 26% 31% 37%

However, data indicates this trend is shifting with the percentage of community members thinking it is "VeryAcceptable" to use marijuana recreationally decreasing from 29% in 2007 to 13% in 2012.

SCCCPP 2012 surveys also indicate that this trend is shifting, with at least 75% of respondents stating theywould support community policy to reduce youth recreational use of marijuana. In addition, to address theincrease in drugged driving and better recognize impaired drivers, CHP has made a specific effort to trainmore offcers as Drug Recognition Experts and looks to partner with prevention programs to increaseeducation and perception of harm and risk. Marijuana prevention efforts and drugged driving education is keyto reducing the impact of drugged driving in Santa Cruz County.

Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety

:':'X ,6e': "'):: ::..' ,,": ..," " ',:. .L,_, s;;lt:ri:: I'C.....':)' .,: ..'.:.22'..'::L .i:,::.::"'C

Ilill~i~:

,i., \:::,:-,v '.' "...... ':' ", ,'r:, ': " ': :""': :'

Fatal & Injury Victims Fatal & Injury Victims Fatal & Injury Victims::i,

:::f;,~:..:.Collsions Kiled Injured Collsions Killed Injured Collsions Kiled Injured

Bicyclists 192 3 189 170 0 172 168 1 170

Bicyclists 20 0 19 13 0 14 16 0 16e:S years

Pedestrians 97 3 96 82 3 85 93 4 95

Pedestrians 11 0 11 13 0 14 23 0 26c:1S years

Source: SWITRS OTS Data Categories

sTä8b (Rev. 6/13)

SCHEDULE AGRAT No. OP1406

GRAT DESCRITIONPAGE 8, revised 7/15/13

0347

Bicycle Safety

OTS traffic collisions during FFY 2011 included 170 bicyclists injured and one fatality in Santa Cruz County. The25 year-old cyclist was killed by a hit-and-run driver. Preliminary data for FFY 2012 also included an elderlycyclist fatality in the City of Santa Cruz, but the primary collision factor was unknown. Santa Cruz Countycontinued to have a significantly higher rate of bicycie injuries/fatalities (65 per 100,000 population in 2011)than the state rate of 35 per 100,000 population), and compared to San Luis Obispo's rate of 43 per 100,000

population, a county which is similar to Santa Cruz County in population size and demographic

characteristics. Santa Cruz County had the second highest OTS ranking in the state for bicyclists injured andkilled, based on daily vehicle miles traveled in 2010 (most current ranking year available). The City of SantaCruz was also ranked very high at fourth for bicyclists injured and killed when compared to 103 similarlypopulated cities in 2010. Over 25% of traffic injury/fatality victims in the City of Santa Cruz in 2010 werebicyclists, more than three times higher than the state average of less than 8% for the same year.

Santa Cruz County's two local colleges, UCSC and Cabrillo College, have seen significant growth in their cyclistpopulations. While both institutions encourage and support the increase of bicycling by offering more bike-friendly parking, loans, shuttles, and bike repair cooperatives, administrators are concerned with preventingand reducing bike crashes. In addition to the increasing number of college cyclists, the County of Santa Cruzhas high numbers of high school students, workers and other community members who are choosingbicycling as an inexpensive and environmentally friendly form of transportation.

Annual bike helmet observation surveys conducted by the Santa Cruz County Health Services Agency (HSA)

indicate that helmet use is increasing among most cyclists over time, from 36% in 2006 to 49% in 2012 - seetrend graph below. Teens remain the least likely age group to wear a helmet (24% in 2012 survey). Bike safetyhelmet use remained significantly lower among Watsonville/South County cyclists (20% in 2012) compared toSanta Cruz/North County cyclists (54%). These trends of relatively low helmet use, particularly in SouthCounty, indicate the need to continue helmet education, encouragement and distribution programs, and towork with law enforcement to increase helmet use compliance among minors.

Bicycle Helmet Use by Age

UI 80%

~ 70%

~ 60%

gi 50%"i:: 40%

~ 30%

~ 20%u(; 10%

"¡ 0%

---!'- ~ ~'" ~ ~", .... ~ ~ .. I

f. --,~~~ .. "" -' - ..I- .. .. 'Wti~ri-

- - - - - - - - - - - .. I- - .. I- ....--

2006 n=2533 2007 n=2602 2008 n=2578 2009 n=2718 2010 n=2787 2012 n=3034

Survey Year

Total Cyclists -Children (0-12 yrs) - - Teens (13-17 yrs) -Young Adult (18-24 yrs) -- Adults (25+ yrs) I

OTS-38b (Rev. 6/13) 88

SCHEDULE AGRAT No. OP1406

GRAT DESCRITIONPAGE 9, revised 7/15/13

0348

Due to the increasing number of cyclists in Santa Cruz County and the disproportionate number of

injuries/fatalities, more resources and work are needed to strengthen prevention efforts targeting cyclists andmotorists through increasing awareness of the dangers of speeding, disobeying traffic laws, distracted andimpaired driving or cycling, and by working with traffic safety partners to motivate safer behaviors among allroad users in Santa Cruz County. .

Pedestrian Safety

Santa Cruz County pedestrian injuries increased by 12% from 85 in FFY 2010 to 95 in FFY 2011. Fatalitiesincreased to four in 2011, the highest number of pedestrian fatalities since FFY 2006. Preliminary data for FFY

2012 included two pedestrians killed. Santa Cruz County's pedestrian injury/fatality rate was 38 per 100,000population in 2011, compared to San Luis Obispo County's rate of only 22, and the state rate of 35 per100,000 population for the same federal fiscal year. 2010 OTS rankings put Santa Cruz County at 11th highestfor pedestrian injuries and fatalities by daily vehicle miles traveled. The City of Watsonville ranked very high in2010 for injuries/fatalities among all pedestrians as well as those under 15 years of age, at fifth among the103 "Group C" cities throughout the state for both categories. Injuries among pedestrians younger than 15years almost doubled from FFY 2010 to 2011 (14 to 26, respectively), and 27% of pedestrian injuries reportedin FFY 2011 occurred among pedestrians younger than 15 years. A review of pedestrian injury/fatalitycollisions that occurred in years 2010 and 2011 indicated that pedestrians were "at fault" in about 30% ofoccurrences versus motorists reported to be "at fault" in 70% of these types of collisions.

Annual pedestrian safety surveys conducted by HSA from 2009 to 2012 have shown an overall increase insafer motorist behaviors, but a decrease in pedestrian safety behaviors. The 2012 survey of over 4,000pedestrians found that 20% of pedestrians failed to use "due care" when crossing the street, as defined by CAlaw, and 23% of childr.en younger than 13 years were found to cross streets without using "due care". Eighty-five percent of observed pedestrians did wait for the signal light before crossing the street. Approximately90% of motorists observed in the 2012 survey stopped before turning right and yielded to pedestrians atintersections or mid-street crosswalks with clear pedestrian right-of-way. Based on injury/fatality data andsurvey findings, effective strategies are needed to reach parents and other community members to increasepedestrian safety countywide and in particular, among Watsonville/South County residents.

Child Passenger Safety (CPS)

It is well known that motor vehicle (MV) crashes are a leading cause of unintentional deaths and injuries inthe U.S.A. There were no MV occupants under the age of 17 years killed in Santa Cruz County during the FFYs2009-2011; however, 157 children 13 years and younger were injured in traffic collisions, resulting inpotential hospitalizations, disabilities and other short and long term trauma to these young victims and theirfamilies.

Annual child restraint observation surveys were conducted from 2007 to 2012 in the vicinity of fiveelementary schools in Watsonville/South Santa Cruz County, where the highest proportion of low-income andmonolingual Spanish-speaking families reside. Survey results showed a slight increase in proper child restraintamong elementary school children, from 41% in 2007 to 45% in 2012. In addition, an alarming 25% of childrenobserved in both the 2007 and 2012 survey appeared to be unrestrained. There was a slight decrease in the

8638b (Rev. 6/13)

SCHEDULE AGRAT No. OP1406

GRAT DESCRITIONPAGE 10, revised 7/15/13

0349

percentage of children riding in the front seat, from 36% in 2007 to 32% in 2012. These results indicate thatthe use of booster seats and proper use of seat belts is still not a common practice among elementary school-aged students in South County. HSA's community-based SEATS for KIDS program sites are reporting a highunmet need for child restraints, particularly among Watsonville/South County residents. In addition, childsafety seat misuse continues to be common countywide, based on inspection results from local child safetyseat checkup events and fitting stations. A number of local school districts have requested assistanceobtaining booster seats for students participating in field trips and other school-related outings.

With the 2012 change in California CPS law requiring children under 8 years of age to ride in a booster seat,unless they are 4' 9" tall, and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation to keep children undertwo years of age rear-facing, continued efforts must be made to ensure that more parents and othercaregivers follow CPS best practice guidelines and that low-income families have access to child restraints thatare safe and appropriate for their children.

PERFORMANCE MEASURES

GRANT GOALS

1. To reduce the number of persons injured in traffic collisions.

2. To reduce the number of persons killed in traffic collisions.

3. To reduce the number of vehicle occupants injured under the age of nine.

4. To reduce the number of vehicle occupants killed under the age of nine.

5. To reduce the number of children under age 8 years riding as front seat passengers.

6. To increase child safety seat usage.

7. To reduce the number of pedestrians injured.

8. . To reduce the number of pedestrians killed.

9. To reduce the number of pedestrians injured under the age of 15 years.

10. To reduce the number of bicyclists injured in traffic collisions.

11. To reduce the number of bicyclists killed in traffic collisions.

12. To reduce the number of bicyclists injured in traffic collisions under the age of 15 years.

13. To increase bicycle helmet compliance for children aged 5 to 18 years.

14. To reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol and/or drug involved collisions.

15. To reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol and/or drug involved collisions.

16. To reduce the number of Had Been Drinking (HBD) drivers under age 21 in fatal and injury collisions.

17. To reduce the numbers of teens who use marijuana and other drugs while driving or while riding with adrugged or HBD driver.

18. To reduce the number of distracted driving-related collisions and injury/fatality victims.

OTS-38b (Rev. 6/13) 86

SCHEDULE AGRAT No. OP1406

GRAT DESCRIPTIONPAGE 11, revised 7/15/13

0350

GRANT OBJECTIVES

1. To plan and conduct2, presentations on child passenger safety, impacting 100 parents, caregivers, andhospital, clinic and/or service agency staff by September 30, 2013. Presentations will include currentCPS laws, proper seat belt and child safety seat usage, airbags and local resources.

2. To host a Child Passenger Safety Technician Certification course for up to 20 CPS technician

candidates. To plan and conduct ~ highly publicized child safety seat checkups to promote correctusage and best practices at community-based locations, impacting 100 parents, caregivers andchildren. Car seat checkers/educators will be NHTSA-certified child passenger safety technicians andevents will b- conducted in accordance with Safe Kids Worldwide requirements.

3. To plan and conduct ~ highly publicized child safety seat checkups to promote correct usage and bestpractices at community-based locations, impacting 100 parents, caregivers and children. Car seatcheckers/educators will be NHTSA-certified child passenger safety technicians and events will beconducted in accordance with Safe Kids Worldwide requirements.

4. To work with local partner agencies to properly fit and distribute 250 no-cost child safety seats tofamilies in need. Car seat recipients will receive proper training from an NHTSA-certified CPST as a

mandatory component of this program.

5. To build upon and expand a pilot booster seat program for local elementary schools to increase safetyof students being transported on field trips and for other off-campus activities.impacting 50 people.

6. To recognize people "saved by the child safety seat or seat belt", as this information is available. OTSwill be notified of all cases that involve an OTS funded child safety seat.

7. To work closely with community based organizations to promote traffic safety programs at both theneighborhood and community leveL.

8. To issue a press release announcing the kick-off of the grant by November 15 of the first grant year.The press releases and media advisories, alerts, and materials should be emailed to the OTS PublicInformation Offcer at pio@ots.ca.gov, and copied to your OTS Coordinator, for approval

14 days prior

to the issuance date of the release.

9. To generate print and electronic media support by distributing ~ additional press releases, story ideasor opinion/editorial submissions to local media outlets.

10. To send all grant-related activity press releases, media advisories, alerts and general public materialsto the OTS Public Information Officer (PIO) at pio@ots.ca.gov, with a copy to your OTS Coordinator. Ifan OTS template-based press release is used, the OTS PIO and Coordinator should be copied when therelease is distributed to the press. If an OTS template is not used, or is substantially changed a draftpress release should first be sent to the OTS PIO for approvaL. Drafts should be sent for approval asearly as possible to ensure adequate turn-around time. Optimum lead time would be 10-20 days priorto the operation.. Media communications reporting the results of grant activities such asENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS are exempt from the recommended advance approval process, but stillshould be copied to the OTS PIO and Coordinator when the release is distributed to the press.Activities such as warrant or probation sweeps and court stings that could be compromised by

86b (Rev. 6/13)

SCHEDULE AGRAT No. OP1406

GRAT DESCRITIONPAGE 12, revised 7/15/13

0351

advanced publicity are exempt from pre-publicity, but are encouraged to offer embargoed mediacoverage and to report the results.

11. To use the following standard language in all press, media, and printed materials: Funding for thisprogram was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the NationalHighway Traffic Safety Administration.

12. To email theOTSPubliclnformationOffceratpio@ots.ca.gov.andcopyyourOTSCoordinator.atleast 30 days in advance a short description of any significant grant related traffic safety event orprogram so that OTS has enough 'notice to arrange for attendance and/or participation in the event.

13. To submit a draft or rough-cut of all printed or recorded material (brochures, posters, scripts, artwork,trailer graphics, etc.), which is meant for general public use, to the OTS Public Information Officer atpio@ots.ca.gov, and copied to your OTS Coordinator, for approval 14 days prior to the production orduplication. To include the OTS logo, space permitting, on grant funded print materials; consult your

OTS Coordinator for specifics relating to this grant.

14. To estabiish all grant-funded positions and train staff on defined roles and duties, including datacollection and reporting requirements, by December 31 of the grant period.

15. To submit in a timely manner all statistical data, financial reimbursement claims, and quarterlyperformance reports, as required by OTS, throughout the grant period.

16. To plan and conduct pre and post seat belt usage observation surveys during OTS grant period.

17. To plan and conduct pre and post child safety seat usage observation surveys during OTS grant period.

18. To plan and conduct pre and post pedestrian safety observation surveys during the OTS grant period.

19. To plan and conduct pre and post bicycle helmet usage observation surveys in Spring 2013 and 2014,in accordance with the HSA/Community Traffic Safety Coalition's annual bike safety observationsurveying schedule.

20. To plan and conduct ~ educational presentations on pedestrian and bicycle safety, impacting 100parents and caregivers. The presentations will include modeling and teaching safety behavior tochildren, navigating stoplights and intersections, current laws and other safety issues.

21. To promote local traffic safety programs in the community, such as the bike and pedestrian hazardreporting system and the County Bike Traffic School, particularly in Watsonville/South Santa CruzCounty area.

22. To conduct bicycle safety focus groups and education/outreach impacting 100 teens and young adultsthrough collaboration with youth groups, service organizations, schools and local colleges.

23. To collaborate with Capitola Police Department and other partner agencies to distribute and properlyfit 280 bicycle helmets and SO lights and reflector sets to students, migrant workers and othercommunity members at, but not limited to the following locations: community-based Helmet Fit Sites,schools and colleges, community fairs, rodeos, and neighborhood events.

24. To develop in partnership with CHP, a Friday Night Live, Impaired Driving (alcohol/marijuana/prescription drugs) prevention campaign that includes ~ school assemblies impacting 1,000 students.

GIS-38b (Rev. 6/13)

.'16

SCHEDULE AGRAT No. OP1406

GRAT DESCRIPTIONPAGE 13, revised 7/15/13

0352

25. To provide in partnership with CHP a Drug Recognition Expert in the Schools training for 50 parents,probation and school staff.

26. To collaborate with law enforcement to plan and conduct Responsible Alcohol Merchant AwardCompliance interviews with 75 businesses.

27. To provide in partnership with California Friday Night Live Partnership a pre and post Roadwatchsurvey project to tally the number of distracted drivers.

28. To collaborate with CHP, to conduct i. "Impact Teen Driving Multi-Media" presentations, impacting1000 students.

29. To collaborate with media partners to share "Txtwiser" campaign information and promotecommunity pledges for the "Txtwiser" campaign, reaching 2,000 students.

30. To provide in partnership with CHP a parent and youth commitment discussion/ pledge tool andpromote Txtwiser pledge through Start Smart classes, reaching 50 parents and new teen drivers.

31. To develop or purchase education materials on distracted road users (motorists, cyclists, pedestrians)for distribution at classes, presentations, community events, meetings and through publications suchas the Watsonville Public Works and Utilities "Our Town" monthly billing insert flyer.

METHOD OF PROCEDURE

Phase 1- Program Preparation (1st Quarter of the Grant Year)

1. Finalize any OTS related paperwork in order to receive funds.

2. Plan and conduct traffic safety pre/baseline observation surveys.

3. Negotiate and finalize sub-contracts and purchase order agreements.

4. Finalize evaluation plan.

5. Develop, obtain OTS Pia approval and disseminate OTS grant kick-off press release.

6. Order helmets, lights, child safety seats (per storage capacity) and initial education materials.

7. Determine educational materials needed for program operations and initiate development and

ordering.

8. Initiate contacts with schools, service organizations and other target groups f.or outreach.

9. Review and update curricula for education sessions and workshops, as needed.

Phase 2 - Program Operations ( 2nd, 3rd and 4th Quarters of the Grant Year

1. Complete ordering of bike safety helmets, bike lights, child safety seats and other materials.

2. Coordinate distribution of child restraints with SEATS for KIDS sites and participating fitting stations.

3. Further develop and expand pilot booster seat program with local elementary schools.

OTS-38b (Rev. 6113)

'l6

SCHEDULE AGRAT No. OP1406

GRAT DESCRITIONPAGE 14, revised 7/15/13

0353

4. Coordinate distribution of bike helmets and Helmet Fit Site staff trainings, as needed.

5. Plan and conduct distracted and impaired driving and other traffic safety education and outreach

activities.

6. Develop and conduct traffic safety social and other media outreach.

7. Plan and conduct CPS technician certification course.

8. Plan and conduct post-grant traffic safety surveys.

Phase 3 - Data Gathering & Reporting - (Throughout Grant Period)

Agencies are required to collect and report quarterly, appropriate data that supports the progress of eachgoals and objective.

Statistical data relating to the grant goals and objectives will be collected, analyzed, and incorporated inQuarterly Performance Reports (QPRs). QPRs for the quarter ending September 30 will include year-to-datecomparisons of goals and objectives. If required, a quarterly data reporting form will be completed eachquarter and submitted as part ofthe QPR.

Reports will compare actual grant accomplishments with the planned accomplishments. They will includeinformation concerning changes made by the Grant Director in planning and guiding the grant efforts.

Reports shall be completed in accordance with OT5 requirements specified in the Grant Program Manual,Chapter 7, and submitted in compliance with the signed Acceptance of Conditions and Certifications (OT5-33)included within this agreement.

METHOD OF EVALUATION

Using the data compiled during the grant, the Grant Director will evaluate: (1) briefly state the originalproblem, (2) specify the most significant goals and objectives, (3) highlight the most significant activities thatcontributed to the success of the program and the strategies used to accomplish the goals, and (4) describethe program's accomplishments as they related to the goals and objectives.

ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT

This program has full support of the County of Santa Cruz. Every effort will be made to continue the activitiesafter the grant conclusion.

DTS-38b (Rev. 6/13) 86

OTS-38d (Rev. 6/13) SCHEDULEBDETAILED BUDGET ESTIMATE

GRANT NO. OP1406Page 1

As of: 7/26/130354

FU NUER CATALOG NUER (CFDA) FU DESCRITIONMINIMUM PENAL TIES FOR

¡64AL 20.608 REPEAT OFFENDERS FORDRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED

402 20.600STATE AND COMMUNITY

HIGHWAY SAFETY

FISCAL YEAR ESTIMTES TOTAL COSTTO GRANTCOST CATEGORY

CFDA

FY-l10/1/13thr

9130/14A. PERSONNL COSTSPositions and Salaries

Regular

Health Educat?!, ..... .

(1 x 520 hrs x$34.95/h) .Sr~FI~altiiEdücat~r, 'd(Ix 385.hhisx $38;9'SIh)

lÌeaÌÙi Progr$pàèi~lists . .

(2x,530.42his:x.~$3Ô3SJh) .'Health ServcéMàiåger .,. ;

(Lx. 62;.iiiìrs x$SO.52Ïh) . . .- .' .'...

Associate Huran.sèrvce Analyst."(. x 257.92 hrs)Ç$41J3Jf)' .Beiletits@d .. 55.93% '. .'. '.' d: .....,. .'.

Category Sub-Total

B. TRAVEL EXPENSEIn-State~ '.'. .... '.' '.' ' .' " 20.60. I $ . 2,000.00 I .' '. . i 1$ '2,000.00Category Sub-Total $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICESChild Passenger Safety Class' ' . I 20.60 I $ .2,500.00 .... 1$ 2,500.00Category Sub-Total $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00D. EQUIPMENTCategory Sub-Total

E. OTHER DIRECT COSTSChild Safety Seats ,. .

Bike HelmetsEducational Materials .'

OÎfice Supplies

Bike LlghislReflector SeHlCategory Sub-Total

F. INDIRECT COSTSCategory Sub-Total

20.601$ "'"AM ....... :lSll" fIfI.. I co,.'... . . . '. . r. .... '.. '''0 ÂfI .1 ~: .. . ". c ..... ~. .'. . '.' . . ~ ~.'

.... . -'. "..:. - .... :'., .... '...,...,

1,,1 t;fI .' : '~ ..,~ " ':'. ~..' '.' '.'.... .. :. ' ,;- : :..... . :.. " .. .... .¡" :I: i::I, .- "iI . _. '. . .

I' '.'...... .L- ..~ ,.' , ..1- d. '. .I. .,0 hi , ~ ". .,. _... () . '. . .

. I ' '.. . .. ..:' .. ....:. ..' . I 20 60 $ A . . ..... " '$ .I . -'. . .-;--. '.. ..', , . ;.'. ". . . ". ...... ..... ..

$ 123,580.00 $ 123,580.00

$ $

'. 20.60 $,20.60_: $

. 20.60" $: 20.60- $

. 20.60 .$$

15,000.00 i

2,240.00.2,403.00.'

527.001,750.00 i ..,

21,920.00

$

$

11.$$

.. . $

$

15,000.002,240.002,403.00

527.001,750.00

21,920.00

$ $

GRAT TOTALI 20.608 $ 150.000.001 ',. ..... .... 1$ 150.000.00

86

0355

OTS-38d (Rev. 6/13) SCHEDULEBDETAIED BUDGET ESTIMATE

GRAT NO. OP1406SUB-BUDGET: Child Passenger Safety Class

As of: 7/9/13

FUN NUBER CATALOG NUBER (CFDA) FUN DESCRITIONMINIM PENAL TIES FOR

405b 20.602 REPEAT OFFENDERS FORDRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED

FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATES TOTAL COST

COST CATEGORY TO GRA

FY-l

CFDA10/1/13thr

A. PERSONNL COSTS,

9/30/14

Positions and SalariesOvertime

CPS Instructors 20.602 $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00

Category Sub-Total $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00

B. TRAVEL EXPENSEIn-State $ - $ -

Out-of-State $ - $ -

Category Sub-Total $ - $ -

C. CONTRACTUAL SERVICESCategory Sub-Total $ - $ -

D. EQUIMENTCategory Sub-Total $ - $ -

E. OTHER DIRCT COSTSCategory Sub-Total $ - $ -

F. INIRCT COSTSCategory Sub-Total $ - $ -

GRAT TOTAL $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00

86

0356SCHEDULE B-1

GRAT No. OP1406As of7/10/13

BUDGET NARTIV Page 1

PERSONNEL COSTS

Fulltime

Salaries-may include wages, salares, special compensations, or authorized absences such as anual leaveand sick leave provided the cost for the individual employee is (a) reasonable for the services rendered, and(b) follows an appointment made in accordance with state or local laws and rules and meets federalrequirements.

Health Educator (1 x 582 hrs @ $34.95/h) One Health Educator wil work under the direction of the SeniorHealth Educator and with traffic safety parers to plan and conduct bike, pedestran education and outreachactivities, observation sureys, data analysis and evaluation.

Senior Health Educator (1 x 385.82 hrs @ $38.98/h) One Senior Health Educator wil conduct grantprogram planing and implementation, staff supervision, monitor budget and subcontracts, generate reports,invoices and other OTS-required documentation; lead staffco-instrctor for child passenger safetyactivities.

Health Services Manager (1 x 62.42 hrs @ $50.52/h): One Health Service Manager wil provide grantoversight and assistance to the Senior Health Educator to meet all OTS grant requirements and ensurecompliance with County HSA fiscal policies and procedures.

Health Program Specialists (2 x 530.42 hrs @ $30.38/h): Health Program Specialist #1 wil work under thedirection of the Senior Health Educator and with the Health Educator to plan and conduct bike, pedestranand child passenger safety education and outreach activities. Health Program Specialist #2 wil work underthe direction of the Associate Human Services Analyst to conduct alcohol and drug prevention-related grantobjectives and activities.

Associate Human Services Analyst (1 x 257.92 hrs @ $41.33/h): Associate Human Serices Analyst wilwork with and have oversight of the alcohol and drg prevention staff and collaborative parers to conductand ensure completion of teen alcohol/drug and distracted driving prevention activities and relatedreporting.

Maximum Benefit RateSocial Securty/FICA/OASDIState Disability/SDIHealth InsuranceWorker's Compensation

Medicare

Retirement

Unemployment Insurance

TOTAL BENEFIT RATE

6.20%1.00%

21.38%2.75%

1.45%

22.74%

.41%

55.93%

Supplanting Statement: Personnel assigned to the grant are conducting a new traffic safety program notpreviously funded with City, County or State funding or were previously in a grant-fuded position.

°8WRev.6/13)

SCHEDULE B-1GRAT No. OP1406

(J 35 7

As of7/10/13

BUDGET NARTIV Page 2

TRAVEL EXPENSE

In State - Costs are included for appropriate staff to attend conferences and training events supportingthe grant goals and objectives and/or traffc safety. Local mileage for grant activities and meetings isincluded. Anticipated travel may include the OTS Leadership and Training Seminar, California BikeSummit 2013, Silicon Valley Bike Summit 2014 and PedsCount! Conference 2014. All conferences,seminars or training not specifcally identifed in the Schedule B-1 (Budget Narrative) must be approvedby OTS. All travel claimed must be at the agency-approved rate. Per Diem may not be claimed for

meals provided at conferences when registrationfees are paid with OTS grantfunds.

CONTRACTUAL SERVICES

Chid Passenger Safety (CPS) Class: Health Services Agency will work with subcontracted CPS instrctorsto plan and conduct a National Standardized CPS Technician Certification course.

EQUIPMENT - None

OTHER DIRECT COSTS

250 Chid Safety Seats - child safety seats (including haress seats with higher weight limits for childrenwho are over 40 pounds but not developmentally ready for boosters) to be purchased and distrbuted at childsafety seat checkup events, fitting/inspection stations, elementar schools and SEATS for KIDS distrbutionsites.

280 Bicycle Helmets - helmets to be purchased and distrbuted at helmet fitting/distrbution sites, bicyclerodeos, schools and other bicycle safety related events.

50 Bike LightslReflector Sets - bike lights/reflector sets to be purchased distrbuted at helmet fitling/distrbution sites, bicycle rodeos, schools, community outreach activities and other bicycle safety relatedevents.

Educational Materials - to purchase and distrbute materials which may include purchased or reproduciblebrochures, pamphlets and fliers, coloring and activity books, posters, signs, scanable baners, DVDs,programming manuals, instrctional toolkits and other and teaching materials, pens, pencils, crayons, erasers,light-weight tote bags and water bottles, safety bliny lights, pedometers, stickers, slap bracelets and/or shoe

laces made with reflective safety materials, table and/or canopy cover with educational message/logos. Allitems purchased wil include traffc safety messaging and the OTS logo if space is available. Additionalitems may be purchased if approved by OTS.

Office Supplies - to purchase and use standard office supplies to support grant related activities, grantmonitoring and reporting. Items may include paper and desktop supplies such as pens, pencils, markers,binders, clips, folders, printing cardges, calendars, date book organizers, flip charts, easels and sticky easel

pads. Additional items may be purchased if approved by OTS.

INDIRECT COSTS - None

PROGRA INCOME - There wil be no program income generated from this grant.

OTS-38f(Rev.6/13) 86

SCHEDULE B-1

GRAT No. OP1406

SUB BUDGET NARTIVCHILD PASSENGER SAFETY CLASS

0358

As of 7/9/13

Page I

PERSONNEL COSTS

Salaries:"may include wages, salaries, special compensations, or authorized absences such as anual leave

and sick leave provided the cost for the individual employee is (a) reasonable for the services rendered, and(b) follows an appointment made in accordance with state or local

laws and rules cìdmeets federal

requirements.

Child Passenger Safety (CPS) Instrctors: Health Services Agency wil work with subcontracted CPSinstrctors to plan and conduct a National Standardized CPS Technician Certification course.

No benefits wil be reimbursed from this grant.

TRAVEL EXPENSE

None

CONTRACTUAL SERVICES

None

EQUIPMENT

None

OTHER DIRECT COSTS

None

INDIRECT COSTS

None

PROGRA INCOME

There wil be no program income generated from this grant.

88f(Rev.7/12)