Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1,...
-
Upload
zachary-donovan -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1,...
![Page 1: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Coulomb excitation of the 42Ca with AGATA Demonstrator
K. Hadyńska-Klęk1,2
P.J. Napiorkowski1, A. Maj3, F. Azaiez4, J.J. Valiente Dobon5
on behalf of the AGATA Collaboration
1) Heavy Ion Laboratory, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland 2) Institute of Experimental Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
3) H. Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland4) Institute for Nuclear Physics, Orsay, France
5) INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Legnaro, Italy
![Page 2: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
42Ca 40Ca
Highly collective structure were found in the 40Ca (also in 36,38Ar)
B(E2; 4+ 2+ in SD) = 170 W.u (DSAM)
Deformation of the 2+ state in the superdeformed band: β2=0.59(9)
(E. Ideguchi et al.,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 2001)
40Ca vs 42Ca
![Page 3: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
B(E2) values in 42Ca suggest smaller deformation of the of the 0+(1837 keV) band than in the case of 40Ca
observation of GDR feeding of presumably deformed band in 42Ca from very deformed hot 46Ti (M.Kmiecik et al. Acta Phys. Pol. B36, 1169(2005))
moment of inertia very similar to that found for the SD-band in 40Ca
40Ca vs 42Ca
42Ca
![Page 4: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
42Ca COULEX @ LNL
beamtime: Feb.2010
beam: 42Ca, 170 MeV
target: 208Pb, 1 mg/cm2
DANTE: 3 MCP detectors
covered θ range 100°-144°
AGATA: 3 clusters
at 143.8 mm from the target
particle – γ coincidence mode: trigger rate 150÷250 Hz
![Page 5: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Preliminary results
K. Hadyńska-Klęk et al., (Acta Phys. Pol B 42, 817 (2011))
![Page 6: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Preliminary results
K. Hadyńska-Klęk et al., (Acta Phys. Pol B 42, 817 (2011))
![Page 7: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Doppler Effect Correction
cos10 c
vEE
42Ca
42Ca
208Pb
![Page 8: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Doppler Effect Correction
cos10 c
vEE
208Pb
42Ca
42Ca
208Pb
![Page 9: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
lines after Doppler correction – two MCP detectors at θ1=210o and θ2=150o
![Page 10: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Tentative level scheme of 42Ca
K. Hadyńska-Klęk et al., (Acta Phys. Pol B 42, 817 (2011))
![Page 11: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
If 1- at 3885 keV…
• Excitation via E2(01+ → 21
+) and E3(21
+→ 1-) transitions
• Deexcitation via E1(1- → 02+ ) 2048 keV
• GOSIA calculations: B(E3; 21
+→ 1-) > 2.5*106 W.u.E2
E3
E1
![Page 12: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
If 1- at 3885 keV…
• Excitation via E2(01+ → 21
+) and E3(21
+→ 1-) transitions
• Deexcitation via E1(1- → 02+ ) 2048 keV
• GOSIA calculations: B(E3; 21
+→ 1-) > 2.5*106 W.u.E2
E3
E1
![Page 13: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Postulated interpretationWe assume that the observed gamma line comes from a 2+ level placed at 2048 keV
The 22+ state can be populated directly via
E2(01+ → 22
+)
Deexcitation – through E2(22+ → 01
+) with 2048 keV
It was enough to reproduce the intensity of the
2048 keV gamma ray with B(E2; 22+ → 01
+) ~ 1 W.u
Observation of the 376 keV line supports this scenario
But...
No signs of this lines in the known level scheme and previous experiments
W.J. Kossler et al., Phys. Rev. 177, 1725 (1969)
![Page 14: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Another unexpected effectIn multi-step Coulex each additional step leads to a weaker excitation →
we expected more counts in the 2424 keV line than in the 1729 keV transition
In the experiment, the 1729 keV line is stronger!
1729 keV = 4400 counts
2424 keV = 300 counts
It seems that the 42+ state is populated stronger
that the 22+ in the same band!
Excitation of the presumably SD band is smaller then it was expected or…
Deexcitation of 2424 keV state goes also through the 376 keV!
![Page 15: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Motivation for the additional experiments
- coincidences analysis was performed but is not conclusive
As long as 376 and 2048 keV lines are not placed in the level scheme, the COULEX analysis results will require to make additional assumptions
Also proovement of the possible superdeformation will be less convincing
The aim of the additional experiments: investigation of the medium and low spin region in 42Ca
![Page 16: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Experiment @ HIL Warsaw
Beam: 32S, 1 pnA, 76 MeV
Target: 12C, 4 mg/cm2
Reaction: 12C(32S,2p)42Ca
Cross section for 2p reaction channel:
110 mb (COMPA & PACE codes)
EAGLE-II array
The most important issues:
- possible new level at 2048 keV
- branching ratio determination of the decay lines from 2424 keV level
- ray angular correlation – to assign spin and parity of the new state(s)
![Page 17: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Experiment @ HIL Warsaw
Beam: 32S, 1 pnA, 76 MeV
Target: 12C, 4 mg/cm2
Reaction: 12C(32S,2p)42Ca
Cross section for 2p reaction channel:
110 mb (COMPA & PACE codes)
EAGLE-II array
The most important issues:
- possible new level at 2048 keV
- branching ratio determination of the decay lines from 2424 keV level
- ray angular correlation – to assign spin and parity of the new state(s)
![Page 18: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Any theories?
![Page 19: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Any theories?
If yes, please contact me:
kasiah(at)slcj.uw.edu.pl
![Page 20: Coulomb excitation of the 42 Ca with AGATA Demonstrator K. Hadyńska-Klęk 1,2 P.J. Napiorkowski 1, A. Maj 3, F. Azaiez 4, J.J. Valiente Dobon 5 on behalf.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070305/55141fd9550346e7488b5753/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Special thanks toP.J. Napiorkowskia, A. Majb, F. Azaiezc, J.J. Valiente-Dobond, G. de Angelisd,
Anil Kumarb, D. Bazzaccoe, P. Bednarczykb, M. Bellatoe, G. Benzonif, L. Bertid, D. Bortolatod, B. Bruyneelg, F. Cameraf, M. Ciemałab, P. Cocconid, A. Colomboe, A. Corsif,F. Crespif, A. Czermakb, Ch. Drostei, B. Dulnyb, E. Farneae, B. Fornalb, S. Franchooc, A. Gadeah, A. Giazf, A. Gottardod,
X. Gravec, J. Gręboszb, E. Grodneri, M. Gulminid, H. Hessg, R. Isocratee, J.Iwanickia, G. Jaworskia,l, M. Kicińska-Habiori, M. Kmiecikb, N. Kondratyevj,
A. Korichim, W. Kortenn, J. Kownackia, M. Kowalczyka, M.Kisielińskia, G. Lehauto, S. Lenzie,k, S. Leonif, S. Lunardie,k, G. Marond, R. Menegazzoe, D.
Mengonip,e, E. Merchanr,s, W. Męczyńskib, C. Michelagnolie,k, J. Mierzejewskia, P. Molinie,k, D.R. Napolid, R. Nicolinif, M. Niikurac, M. Palacza, G. Rampazzoe, F. Recchiae,k, N. Redono, P. Reiterg, D. Rossod, E. Sahind, J.
Srebrnya, I. Stefanc, O. Stezowskio, J. Styczeńb, N. Toniolod, C.A. Ure, V. Vandonef, B. Wadswortht, A. Wiensg, K. Wrzosek-Lipskaa, M. Zielińskaa, M.
Zięblińskib
a) Heavy Ion Laboratory, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland b) H. Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland c) Institute of Nuclear Physics, Orsay, France d) INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Legnaro, Italy e) INFN Sezione di Padova, Padova, Italy f) Universita di Milano
and INFN sezione di Milano, Milano, Italy g) University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany h) IFIC, CSIC-University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain i) Institute of Experimental Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland j) Joint
Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia k) Universita' di Padova, Padova, Italy l) Faculty of Physics, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland m) CSNSM Orsay, France n) CEA Saclay, France o) IPN
Lyon, France p) University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, UK r) TU Darmstadt, Germany s) GSI Darmstadt, Germany t) University of York, York, UK