Cottonwood Poster
-
Upload
nat-defries -
Category
Documents
-
view
62 -
download
0
Transcript of Cottonwood Poster
Introduction
Effect of Old Millpond Dike on Cottonwood Growth in Cowling Arboretum,Northfield, Minnesota
DeFRIES, Natalie, MIDGET, Rosie, and RATLIFF-CRAIN, EthanCarleton Summer Science Institute 2010
Figure 1. Map of cottonwood sample sites in Cowling Arboretum (modified from Case, 2010).
Figure 2. Graph of the ratio of adjacent ring widths (normalized width) from cottonwood core #6 overlaid with yearly runing average of monthly rainfall ploted relative to the average rainfall (rainfall anomaly) from 1982-2010. Average monthly rainfall (1982-2010) is 2.3 inches.
This study focuses on the growth and development of cottonwood trees (Populus deltoides) on either side of the Old Millpond dike in Cowling Arboretum, Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota (see Fig. 1). The dike creates two distinct forested areas, one of which may experience reduced water availability, and thus reduced growth rate. After analyzing tree core samples, we have found that the presence of the dike has no significant effect on tree ring growth; both regional climate and topography play a larger role.
Results
DiscussionWe are not able to find clear differences between cottonwood growth on opposite sides of the dike. Tree growth correlates much more with precipitation levels and topography. This suggests that local factors are the driving forces behind the variations in ring size. Low precipitation caused decreases in growth for some years, though several trees had high growth during these years (Fig. 3a). During high precipitation years, this trend was reversed (Fig. 3b). These graphs show how many trees had positive and negative correlations to different levels of rainfall. Temperature only appeared as a major factor in years with low precipitation and above-average temperatures, which tended to cause smaller rings.
Another key environmental factor is the location of the tree. Trees in flood plains on both sides of the dike were clearly affected by variation in precipitation. If precipitation was low, less water would have reached trees that were higher in elevation or out of the flood plains, which would have caused a significant reduction in growth.
The only possible indication of dike impact on cottonwood growth is the absence of older trees on the east side of the dike. The parallel planting pattern and similar age of the older trees on the west side suggest that they were planted as a windbreak. Because there probably weren’t any cottonwoods planted by humans on the east side of the dike, seeds needed to travel by natural means over the dike to grow.
References Case, Nat, Comp. "Arb Map." Map. Carleton Col-lege. 5th Ed. Minneapolis: Hedberg Maps, MN.
Speer, James H. Fundamentals of Tree-Ring Research. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 2010.
MethodsWe used increment borers to collect 5 mm-diameter cores from 11 cottonwood trees. Typical recovery of the cores was from 20 to 80 cm. Cores were stored in straws and placed in denatured alcohol to dehydrate overnight.
After drying, cores were secured to core holders with wood glue and planed down to an even, flat surface so the rings were easier to see. They were then sanded and lacquered and, once dry, they were scanned into the computer using 2400 dpi and 48 bits. Photoshop was used to measure and keep track of the rings, which were then plotted in Excel using a mean sensitivity formula (Speer 2010) .
ConclusionsIn our study of the cottonwood trees in the Arboretum, we found that the Old Millpond Dike has little effect on growth. The topography and annual precipitation have a much more pronounced impact of ring width than the tree’s position on either side of the dike. However, the sample size of trees on the east side was limited due to the sheer lack of cottonwood trees. The effects of the dike could be measured more accurately with other trees, such as maples or willows included in the study
We cored 11 cottonwoods total, 3 east of the dike and 8 west of the dike. The three eastern trees were relatively young at 17, 28, and 32 years old; the others ranged from 25 to 82 years old, with several trees older than 70.
Growth of cottonwood trees varies in relation to regional climate changes, and the ring width of trees east and west of the dike follow similar trends (accounting for individual variation in growth rate). Precipitation and temperature both contribute to a tree’s annual growth, but their effects can be somewhat delayed. A trend of increased or decreased temperature for a year caused a reaction in growth for that year, while the effect of precipitation on growth appeared in the growth ring of the year following the significant event, or not at all. Tree ring width doesn’t vary exactly with rainfall; however, these data are correlated in trends over the course of several years. For example, Fig. 2 shows a U-shaped decrease and increase for both rainfall and tree ring width from 1993 to 1998.
Many tree cores reflected years of unusually high and low precipitation and temperature. In years with high temperature and low precipitation, 14 trees correlated with the low rainfall (experienced a decrease in growth rate) and 3 trees had an inverse relationship (experienced an increase in growth rate). Years with high or low temperatures and high precipitation had many instances of correlation with the precipitation (increase in growth). Low precipitation with high temperatures inhibited tree ring growth more than low precipitation and low temperatures.
0.2
Year
Nor
mal
ized
tree
ring
wid
th
Rain
fall
anom
aly
(in)
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
0
0.4
0.6 0
0.5
1.0
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
0.8
1.0Correlations for Low Precipitation Years
Correlations for High Precipitation Years
Figure 3.a,b. Graph of positive and negative ring growth correlations to anomalous precipitation years.from 1931-2008.
Fig. 3.a
Fig. 3.b
112
3
1
4
7 89
10
65
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1931
19
34
1937
19
40
1949
19
50
1951
19
56
1957
19
58
1959
19
63
1964
19
68
1977
19
88
1989
19
90
1996
19
97
2003
20
04
# of
Rin
g C
orre
latio
ns
Years With Below Average Precipitation
Positive Negative
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1932
19
39
1942
19
43
1945
19
46
1952
19
60
1965
19
69
1971
19
73
1983
19
87
1991
19
92
1993
19
94
1998
19
99
2004
20
05
2008
# of
Rin
g C
orre
latio
ns
Years With Below Average Precipitation
Positive Negative