CoTESOL 2015

35
Student’s strategies behind dealing with misunderstandings in the classroom Are these strategies cultural? Kathleen Hamel

description

This PowerPoint was presented at CoTESOL 2015.

Transcript of CoTESOL 2015

Page 1: CoTESOL 2015

Student’s strategies behind dealing with misunderstandings

in the classroom

Are these strategies cultural?

Kathleen Hamel

Page 2: CoTESOL 2015

Agenda

• Rationale• Previous Research• Research questions• Method• Conclusions• Discussion• Pedagogical implications

Page 3: CoTESOL 2015

Rationale– Provide an understanding on how culture can affect

students and their strategies to clarify misunderstandings– How can teachers then accommodate their learners’

needs?• Through having an awareness of these differences, then

teachers can adjust their own strategies.– How can teachers facilitate the implementation of the

strategies that they prefer or find effective?

Page 4: CoTESOL 2015

Opening Questions

• What are the most common types of strategies that ESL students use in/out of your classroom to clarify a misunderstanding (i.e. not understanding the content presented)?

• Do you notice that students from different cultural backgrounds use different strategies?

• What are some other possible reasons that students choose certain strategies?

Page 5: CoTESOL 2015

Previous Research• Based upon Hofstede’s (1986) model of culture, intercultural

competence can be achieved through three stages:– Awareness– Knowledge– Skills

• From Kurtyka (2007), it was concluded that if there is a focus on language and discernible cultural practices, in language teaching, then a greater mastery of culture would result. Thus, the likelihood of misunderstandings would decrease.

Page 6: CoTESOL 2015

Previous Research

• Misunderstandings could be solved by a common repair, if a different inference is what led to the misunderstanding initially , even if the misunderstanding is based on interculturality (Hinnenkamp, 2001).– Therefore, intercultural communication doesn’t have to be conflict

driven, as previous research had indicated, according to Hinnenkamp.

Page 7: CoTESOL 2015

Previous Research

• Communication breakdown can occur when two cultures engage in discourse since verbal and non-verbal cues vary between cultures (Huang, Dooterwich & Bowers, 2012).

• In order to avoid being attributed to the cause of misunderstandings, students might not speak to ‘save face.’

Page 8: CoTESOL 2015

This Study

• Misunderstandings-–when there is confusion based upon the content

being taught

Page 9: CoTESOL 2015

Research questions• How does a student clarify misunderstandings based on

content in an ESL context?– From a friend/classmate– Before/after class– E-mail – In class– Internet– From the teacher directly

Page 10: CoTESOL 2015

Research Questions

• Are the strategies that students use based upon their cultural background?

• Do the strategies that students use change from their native country to the US?–If yes, in what ways do they change?

Page 11: CoTESOL 2015

Method: Participants

Questionnaire:

- 24 students:- 13 - Chinese- 8 - Vietnamese- 3 - Arabic

Ages:- 19 -24

- Education:- Current

undergraduates- Gender

- 17 Female- 7 Male

Page 12: CoTESOL 2015

Method: Participants

Interview:- 3 students:

- Chinese- Arabic- American English, native

- Ages:- 19 -21

- Education:- Current

undergraduates- Gender

- All Female

Page 13: CoTESOL 2015

Method: Questionnaire

Questionnaire:- What types of strategies do students use when

clarifying misunderstandings?- Do these strategies change from their native

country to the USA?

Page 14: CoTESOL 2015

Method: Questionnaire1= Strongly Agree2= Agree3= Disagree4= Strongly Disagree

Example Questions:- In the United States, when I don’t understand

something in class, I usually look for answers on the Internet.

- In my home country, it’s more common for students to ask their classmates a question when they don’t understand what’s going on.

Page 15: CoTESOL 2015

Method: Interview

Interview:- What strategies do they use most often in each context?- Why do students choose the strategies that they use?

Page 16: CoTESOL 2015

Method: Interview

Example Interview Questions:• When you didn’t understand a teacher in your home

country, what would you do? • Why do you think misunderstandings occur in the

classroom?• Do you think misunderstandings occur in the

classroom due to different expectations based upon previous classroom experiences? Why or why not?

Page 17: CoTESOL 2015

Questionnaire Conclusions

Results revealed some themes:– In their native country, students prefer:

• Fellow classmates– In the USA, students prefer:

• E-mail• Directly from the teacher

– In both contexts, students prefer:• Before/After class

Page 18: CoTESOL 2015

Classmates.- Three questions per context

- Out of 72 individual responses

- Native country:- 61 agree- 11 disagree

- USA:- 41 agree- 31 disagree

Nat

ive

Cou

ntry

USA

Strongly Agree 32 14

Agree 29 27

Disagree 11 25

Strongly Disagree 0 6

84.7%15.3%

56.9%43.1%

Questionnaire Conclusions

Page 19: CoTESOL 2015

Classmates in their native countries.

Classmates in the USA.

Questionnaire Conclusions

Page 20: CoTESOL 2015

Before or after class.

Nat

ive

Cou

ntry

USA

Strongly Agree 12 17

Agree 20 15

Disagree 13 15

Strongly Disagree 3 1

- Two questions per context- Out of 48 individual responses

- Native country:- 66.7% agree- 33.3% disagree

- USA:- 66.7% agree- 33.3% disagree

Questionnaire Conclusions

Page 21: CoTESOL 2015

Using e-mail.- Two questions per context

- Out of 48 individual responses

- Native country:- 27.1% agree- 72.9% disagree

- USA:- 68.8% agree- 31.2% disagree

Nat

ive

Cou

ntry

USA

Strongly Agree 5 16

Agree 8 17

Disagree 16 13

Strongly Disagree 19 2

Questionnaire Conclusions

Page 22: CoTESOL 2015

E-mail in the USA.

E-mail in their native countries.

Questionnaire Conclusions

Page 23: CoTESOL 2015

During class time.

Nat

ive

Cou

ntry

USA

Strongly Agree 7 16

Agree 14 14

Disagree 23 16

Strongly Disagree 4 2

- Two questions per context- Out of 48 individual responses

- Native country:- 43.8% agree- 56.2% disagree

- USA:- 62.5% agree- 37.5% disagree

Questionnaire Conclusions

Page 24: CoTESOL 2015

Using Internet.- Two questions per context

- Out of 48 individual responses

- Native country:- 54.2% agree- 45.8% disagree

- USA:- 60.4% agree- 39.6% disagree

Nat

ive

Cou

ntry

USA

Strongly Agree 11 8

Agree 15 21

Disagree 19 16

Strongly Disagree 3 3

lyQuestionnaire Conclusions

Page 25: CoTESOL 2015

Internet in the USA.

Questionnaire Conclusions

Page 26: CoTESOL 2015

Directly asking the teacher.

Nat

ive

Cou

ntry

USA

Strongly Agree 12 13

Agree 14 20

Disagree 14 9

Strongly Disagree 8 6

- Two questions per context- Out of 48 individual responses

- Native country:- 54.2% agree- 45.8% disagree

- USA:- 68.8% agree- 31.2% disagree

Questionnaire Conclusions

Page 27: CoTESOL 2015

Interview ConclusionsEach student differed in the strategies that chose:- Chinese student

- (1) office hours (2) e-mail (3) classmates

- Arabic student- (1) office hours (2) before/after class

- American student- (1) in class (2) websites (3) office hours

Page 28: CoTESOL 2015

Interview Conclusions

Reasons for choosing strategies fell into three categories:

– “Saving face”– Context of the class

• Size of class• Perception of the teacher

– Culture

Page 29: CoTESOL 2015

Interview Conclusions

“Saving face”

“…only ask a question [in class] if I know my classmates well enough...”

- Arabic student

Page 30: CoTESOL 2015

Interview Conclusions

Context of the class“It depends if it’s a smaller or a larger class setting. If it was a smaller class setting, then I would just do it in the middle of lecture. If not, I would wait till the end and ask her aferwards.”

- American student

Page 31: CoTESOL 2015

Interview Conclusions

CultureEven when the topic was currently being discussed, and the student was confused about the content, she wouldn’t ask a question because that’s how it was at her high school.

- Chinese student

Page 32: CoTESOL 2015

Discussion

– Based upon your past experiences, do these results align with what you’ve noticed?

– Are there any additional strategies that you see students use?

– Why do you think these strategies change from one context to a different one?

Page 33: CoTESOL 2015

Pedagogical ImplicationsWhen working in an ESL context, it’s important to:- Foster a comforting classroom atmosphere- Encourage students to ask questions

- In class, e-mail, or office hours

- Provide time before/after class to allow for students to come up and ask questions

- Consistently ask clarifying questions or repeat difficult material

- Provide reliable resources for students to use outside of class

Page 34: CoTESOL 2015

Pedagogical Implications

• How do you encourage students to deal with misunderstandings in the classroom?

• Any other questions?

Page 35: CoTESOL 2015

ReferencesHinnenkamp, V. (2001). Constructing Misunderstanding as a Cultural Event.

In A. DiLuzio, S. Gunthner & F. Orletti, Culture in Communication: Analyses of intercultural situations (1st ed., pp. 211 243). Philadelphia: John BenjaminsNorth America.

Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 10(30), 301-320.

Huang, J., Dotterwich, E., & Bowers, A. (2012). Intercultural miscommunication: Impact on ESOL students and implications for ESOL teachers. Joutnal of Instructional Psychology 39(1), 36- 40.

Kurtyka, A. (2007). From language to culture: On the intercultural dimension of foreign language learning and teaching. In A. Pearson-Evans & A. Leahy (Eds.). Intercultural spaces: Language, Culture, Identity (pp. 57-72). New York: Peter Lang.