COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy...

56
1 PRIME MINISTERS OFFICE DEPUTY STATE SECRETARIAT FOR ARCHITECTURE AND BUILDING AFFAIRS COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS IN HUNGARY REPORT TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION MARCH 2018

Transcript of COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy...

Page 1: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

1

PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE

DEPUTY STATE SECRETARIAT FOR ARCHITECTURE AND BUILDING AFFAIRS

COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE

ENERGY PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS IN HUNGARY

REPORT TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION

MARCH 2018

Page 2: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

2

Table of contents

Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................3

Executive summary ...........................................................................................................................................3

Major changes since the previous report in 2013 ..........................................................................................4

Initial data on reference buildings and packages .........................................................................................4

Costing ................................................................................................................................................................5

Determining energy demand and global costs .............................................................................................6

Assessment of variants by reference building ...............................................................................................7

Summary of the variants ................................................................................................................................12

The relationship between the optimal level of overall energy performance (Ep value) and the respective requirement ...................................................................................................................................13

The optimal level of thermal transmittance (U) and its relation to the requirements ...........................14

Definitions ........................................................................................................................................................16

Annexes:

1. Annex 1: Geometric characteristics

2. Annex 2: Basic energy performance data of buildings

3. Annex 3: Packages for building constructions

4. Annex 4: Packages for technical building and electric systems

5. Annex 5: Investment costs

6. Annex 6: Determining energy demand and global costs (comparing variants, by

types)

7. Annex 7: Optimal level of overall energy performance (Ep value)

8. Annex 8: Optimal level of thermal transmittance (U value)

Page 3: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

3

Introduction

Pursuant to Article 4(1) of Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings (the

‘Directive’), Member States must ensure that minimum energy performance requirements

are set with a view to achieving cost-optimal levels. This paragraph also provides for a

review of these requirements at regular intervals no longer than five years. The previous

assessment was submitted by Hungary to the European Commission in March 2013. That

Report showed the need for more stringent requirements. The relevant Decree No 7/2006 of

the Minister Without Portfolio of 24 May 2006 on the determination of the energy

characteristics of buildings (the ‘Decree’) was supplemented accordingly by adding Annex 5

on cost-optimal requirements (the ‘COR’). The COR came into force on 1 January 2015 in

relation to investments implemented using national and EU funds aimed at energy savings

or support from the central budget. As of 1 January 2018, the COR has become mandatory

for all investments falling within the scope of the Decree.

As five years have elapsed since March 2013, another review is required. The method of

reviewing and reporting is provided for under Article 5 of the Directive. In accordance with

this Article, the Commission adopted Regulation (EU) No 244/2012 supplementing Directive

2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the energy performance of buildings by

establishing a comparative methodology framework for calculating cost-optimal levels of minimum

energy performance requirements for buildings and building elements (the ‘EU Regulation’), the

method set out in which was used as a basis for this Report.

Executive summary

Due to the combined effect of the reduction in energy prices and the rise in the price of

building materials and construction services, the optimal level of U values determining the

thermal insulation of buildings is showing lower energy efficiency than before. The

requirements adapted to the previous optimal values therefore easily comply with the

Directive. This effect proved to be more moderate for overall energy performance (the Ep

value) indicating the energy consumption of the whole building. The level of energy

efficiency set forth in the requirements in this context is 15 % higher on average than the

absolute optimal level. Accordingly, the requirements laid down in the Decree are in

conformity with those in the EU Regulation and, therefore, no further measures are

required.

Zsolt Füleky

Deputy State Secretary for Architecture and Building Affairs

Page 4: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

4

Major changes since the previous report in 2013

The calculation of optimal levels was performed by updating the data items in Hungary’s

2013 Report1. The reference buildings and improvement packages have been maintained. The

analysis carried out for this update mostly takes into account the state of affairs in 2017,

depending on available data.

As compared to the 2013 Analysis, which calculated energy demand (Ep) using the

calculation method applicable in 2012, there have been several changes, the most relevant of

which include, but are not limited to, the following:

air exchange from the lack of airtightness is now taken into account,

boiler energy efficiency has been modified in certain cases,

the domestic hot water generation (DHWG) resource has decreased for certain single family buildings,

the energy demand of internal heat load and lighting has been changed,

the calculation method for heat recovery from air has been changed,

There have also been significant changes in investment costs between 2012 and 2017:

the costs of constructing complete building constructions for new buildings have increased by 14-17 %,

the doors and windows market has been restructured, and related costs have typically increased by 10-20 %,

the installation costs of thermal insulation have increased by 20-40 %,

the costs of technical building system and electric system investments have increased by 7-12 %.

Another major change is that only Class A2 non-combustible facade thermal insulation

systems may be installed on tall buildings. This applies only to TH-2 buildings made of

precast concrete panels, and the replacement of thermal insulation material causes further

price increase.

Unlike in the 2013 Report, the partial and final results of energy calculations and cost

calculations are presented together. This means that they are not included in Annexes 1 and

2 but are all presented in Annex 6 by building type.

Initial data on reference buildings and packages

No essential changes have occurred in the building categories included, in their geometric

characteristics or in the initial technical facilities as compared to those in the 2013 Report.

However, there have been changes in the standard use of a number of types of technical

building system equipment and their calculation methods. As of 1 January 2015, windows

installed under an energy efficiency grant scheme must have a thermal transmittance (Uw) of

1.15 W/m2K. The market has been reorganised due to the efforts to adapt to the new

1 Calculations for the establishment of the cost-optimal level of energy performance requirements for buildings, 2013, Energiaklub, Krisztina Severnyák, Orsolya Fülöp

Page 5: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

5

requirements. The window type with Uw=1.6 W/m2K previously assessed has almost

completely disappeared, and has therefore been replaced by windows with Uw=1.4 W/m2K

in this assessment. In addition, windows with Uw=1.3 W/m2K have been replaced by ones

with Uw=1.15 W/m2K.

Further details are presented in Annexes 1, 2, 3 and 4. It should be noted that additional

variants were assessed for some building categories in terms of technical issues and solar

cells.

Costing

The costs of investment components are included in Annex 5.

For investor calculations the following cost data were taken into account in respect of energy carrier

prices.

Type of energy carrier

Price of energy carrier (HUF/kWh)

natural gas 11.8

electricity 37.1

district heating 14.1

district heating, institution 17.1

firewood 9.9

wood pellets 15.3

Table 0.1

Except for firewood and pellets, the prices of energy carriers for the first year of the

assessment were provided by the Hungarian Energy and Public Utility Regulatory Authority

based on the national average prices. Table 0.1 includes a sales tax of 5 % for district heating

and 27 % for other energy carriers.

Energy carrier

CO2 emissions per energy carrier used

(g/kWh)

electricity 365

natural gas 203

fuel oil 279

coal 377

district heating 273

firewood, biomass 0

solar energy, wind energy, hydropower, geothermal energy (other than heat pumps)

0

Table 0.22

2 NES background studies for climate policy based on the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Page 6: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

6

CO2 emissions were taken into account for the macroeconomic analysis with the values in

Table 0.2. The same values had been used previously for the evaluation of grants. These

values only include CO2 released by burning energy carriers in appliances (boilers, turbines,

etc.) installed in the territory of the country and exclude emissions from the production and

transportation of energy carriers. Another important fact, from the perspective of

macroeconomic analysis, is that the district heating provider receives state aid for residential

consumers. In respect of the aid paid for district heating in 2016, the average amount per

energy carrier was 6.28 HUF/kWh, which increases macroeconomic price data as compared

to those in Table 0.1. This aid applies to reference building TH-2.

The pricing used for the calculation of global costs was based on the following values.

Costing model code

annual increase in electricity

price (%)

annual increase in other energy carrier prices (%)

discount rate (%)

cost model and perspective

E1 D3 I 1.50 1.00 3.00 investor

E2 D3 I 3.00 2.00 3.00 investor

E1 D5 I 1.50 1.00 5.00 investor

E2 D5 I 3.00 2.00 5.00 investor

E1 D3 M 1.50 1.00 3.00 macroeconomic

E2 D3 M 3.00 2.00 3.00 macroeconomic

E1 D5 M 1.50 1.00 5.00 macroeconomic

E2 D5 M 3.00 2.00 5.00 macroeconomic

Table 0.3

The model E1 D3 I is used to establish the optimal values.

Determining energy demand and global costs

In accordance with the experience gained during previous analyses, the partial and final

results of both energy demand calculations and cost calculations are now presented in the

same table to increase transparency. Thus, these data are included by type in Annex 6.

The assessment of the variants’ reasonableness has been made more transparent by

introducing further parameters. We introduced:

the parameter ‘investment (HUF/m2)’ which expresses the initial cost of an

improvement variant calculated for useful floor space, and helps to determine which

building categories require the highest unit costs;

the parameter ‘costs of savings (HUF/kWh)’ which expresses the costs of an

improvement variant calculated for the amount of energy saved, and helps to

determine which variants are suitable to ensure considerable savings at the lowest

costs;

the parameter ‘static payback time (a)’ is the investment cost divided by the value of

energy price reduction achieved in the first year (it excludes the discount rate and

Page 7: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

7

the increase in energy price, but includes maintenance costs), and assists in investors’

decisions and helps to assess the acceptability of a variant;

the parameter ‘static global costs (HUF)’ is the sum of initial costs, maintenance

costs, and the energy costs of the first year as multiplied by 20 or 30 and helps to

verify sensitivity analysis. In other words, it is a simplified verification model

calculated using a discount rate of 0% and an energy price increase of 0 %.

The absolute optimal levels determined by each costing model are marked with a red

background in Annex 6. Similarly to the 2013 Analysis, the comparison is also shown in a

graph.

Assessment of variants by reference building

On the basis of Annex 6, the following statements can be made.

CSH-1: Existing single family building; loam

This type of building constitutes about 10 % of the residential building stock. As regards the

building envelope, optimal levels were typically obtained with medium-level improvement

packages No 8 and 11 (U=1.15 W/m2K for windows, 0.35 for walls, etc.). For the majority of

price models, variant No 11 including the abovementioned renovation of building

constructions combined with technical improvements, i.e. the replacement of the heating

installation represents the optimal level. However, it should be noted that in contrast to the

burning of purchased firewood as assumed in the calculation model, a considerable amount

of wastes produced in and around the house may be used in such buildings for energy

purposes. Nevertheless, the energy performance upgrading of these buildings is justified

precisely because burning wastes can cause significant health impairment.

CSH-2 Existing single family building, small-sized brick

Due to the similarities with reference building CSH-1, the same findings can be made in

respect of the building envelope, with the addition that the assessment of CSH-2 also

included technical building system packages used more widely, such as heating with natural

gas. Upgrading to such an appliance is more likely with this reference building than with

CSH-1. From the standpoint of an investor, a changeover to heating with natural gas appears

to be more favourable. The costs of connection to the natural gas network and the

construction of pipelines were not taken into consideration in the analysis. Variant No 11

with natural gas heating is still an optimal solution for the E1 D3 I price model even when

this cost is estimated at HUF 0.5 million. However, a changeover to natural gas is no longer

optimal where the connection and development fee is estimated at HUF 1 million. In that

case, variant No 14 would represent the optimal level, implying that – similarly to CSH-1 –

advanced wood burning is optimal under such conditions. From a macroeconomic

perspective, maintaining wood burning along with the modernisation of building

construction and technical building systems typically gives the optimal solution. Assuming a

high increase in energy price and a low discount rate (E2 D3 I and E2 D3 M), variant No 19

Page 8: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

8

with solar cells proves to be the optimal solution when combined with a complex renovation.

Further details on the optimal values provided by solar cells can be found under CSH-6.

CSH-3 Existing single family building, B30 brick

This reference building is very similar to the previous two. However, an important difference

is that here gas convector heaters installed in each room are assumed as an initial system.

Despite the low (76 %) efficiency of a gas convector heater, the improvement of the technical

building system would not be optimal; instead, the renovation of the building envelope can

be considered to be the optimal solution, just as with the two previous options. Above

variant No 10, the replacement of existing gas convector heaters is not optimal even when a

lower initial efficiency of 71 % is taken into account in the calculation. However, it should be

noted that the simplified method referred to in the Decree does not take into account the

operation of a boiler at partial load, which could in practice completely nullify the reduction

in energy demand gained through the renovation of the building envelope. If a reduction in

efficiency of at least 15 % occurs seasonally due to the part load of the heat generating

appliance, the improvement of the technical building system becomes cost-effective. In this

case, the optimal value would be 136 kWh/m2 with variant No 11.

In summary, we should not conclude that it is not worth replacing a gas convector heater

with a more modern heating system in a single family building.

CSH-4 Existing single family building, holed brick

Similarly to the previous study, variant No 11, i.e. a combination of medium-level thermal

insulation, improvement and boiler replacement remains the optimal solution for this single

family building typical of the 1980s.

CSH-5 Existing single family building, Porotherm brick

For this 1990s reference building, extensive renovation has not proved to be optimal.

However, variant No 19, which includes only the replacement of the boiler, was found to be

favourable. From a macroeconomic perspective, the installation of a solar collector under

variant No 18 gives the optimal solution at a discount rate of 3 %. Accordingly, boiler

replacement should be supported for newer buildings in combination with the installation of

a solar collector.

CSH-6 New single family building, Porotherm brick

The optimal solution for this newly built reference building was again medium-level thermal

insulation and windows, which are represented by variant No 15 with a consumption of

132 kWh/m2a. This should be compared to a typical new single family building certified in

2017 with a consumption of 127 kWh/m2a, although a consumption of 230 kWh/m2a was

still accepted. Consequently, the regular construction practice reflects the cost-optimal level.

For certain price models a more advantageous thermal insulation also proved to be optimal

(variants No 18 and 20). These can comply with the COR, which came into force in 2018 for

Page 9: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

9

all building types, with respect to the U value as well. As a result, COR requirements impose

an extra cost of less than 2% on builders as compared to the 2017 average.

Supplementing a technical building system with a heat recovery system, a heat pump or a

solar collector was not found to be optimal either. With an investor model, a solar cell (PV) is

only considered optimal when there is a significant price increase and low discount rate;

however, it is not optimal for the model E1 D3 I which was taken into account. It should be

noted that this study calculates with a 10-year lifecycle for inverters instead of the 5-year

lifecycle assumed in the previous one; even so, a solar cell is only found to be optimal under

favourable funding conditions.

Variant No 18 represents an exceptional combination where a 1.15 W/m2K window is paired

with a 0.22 W/m2K non-transparent building envelope package instead of a 0.35 W/m2K

one, and has more advantageous technical building system control than variant No 1. From a

macroeconomic perspective, this variant is the optimum level for several models.

Variants No 13, 14, 20 and 21 comply with the requirements for nearly zero-energy buildings

(NZEB), which are set out in Annex 6 to the Decree. Out of these, variant No 20 gives the

optimal solution. The requirements for the share of energy from renewable sources are laid

down in Part IV of Annex 6 to the Decree. The amount of renewable energy sources required

for this variant is 19.3 kWh/m2a, while the current amount of renewable energy sources is

23.9 kWh/m2a. Due to a 10-year lifecycle assumed for an inverter, this variant proved to be

the optimal level for a number of price models. When calculating with a lifecycle of 7 years,

this variant is only optimal with E2 D3 M. However, the application of a solar cell will not

represent the optimal solution in any of the cases when a lifecycle of 5 years is assumed. In

such cases, No 18 replaces No 20 as the optimal variant. It is apparent from the above that

the lifecycle of an inverter is of key importance in terms of the energy efficiency of buildings.

By comparing variant No 15 with No 20 it can be observed that an extra cost of 6 % is

required for an NZEB as compared to an average building built in 2017.

TH-1 Existing apartment block, ten-storey, precast concrete panels

Since 2012, a facade thermal insulation system with an A2 fire rating is required for tall

buildings. This requirement only applies to this reference building out of those assessed. As

a result of this stricter level of fire prevention, a rock-wool thermal insulation with a higher

price had to be taken into account for this reference building. Nevertheless, variant No 11

which includes complex renovation continues to be the optimal level. From a

macroeconomic perspective, the use of a solar collector was found to be optimal in one case,

and therefore, support for its installation is justified.

TH-2 Existing apartment blocks with outside corridor made of brick

Similarly to CSH-3, gas convector heaters were taken into consideration in the calculation.

Page 10: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

10

The same level of thermal protection (1.15/0.35) has proved to be optimal. However, for this

reference building the improvement of the technical building system with the installation of

a central-heating boiler (variant No 11) was also found to be optimal. The reason why this is

very beneficial is that a facade flue outlet in such buildings carries a serious risk to the health

of individuals and the condition of the building due to the closed urban street structure and

air shafts and atriums. Nevertheless, the replacement of old gas convector heaters with new

ones as an independent solution under variant No 17, as well as this option combined with

thermal insulation and window replacement under variants No 18 and 19, were also

assessed. The installation of a new gas convector heater was not found to be optimal in any

case but it at least ensures lower global costs as compared to leaving the heating system

unchanged. Another reason why supporting the individual replacement of gas convector

heaters with facade flue outlets is not practical is that during a subsequent installation of

thermal insulation the heaters would have to be removed and then reinstalled, which

requires two visits and is done at a high cost. The same applies to the improvement of

thermal protection only.

TH-3 New multifamily building made of Porotherm brick

Similarly to the previous assessment, the initial variant has proved to be the optimal with a

consumption of 138 kWh/m2a. Variants 13, 14 and 15 were also assessed in respect of the

minimum share of energy supplied from renewable sources. It was found that variants 14

and 15 comply with the U value requirements for nearly zero-energy buildings.

Out of these three options, 14 represents the optimal level. With this variant, the amount of

renewable energy sources required is 18.4 kWh/m2a, while the current amount of renewable

energy sources is 32.4 kWh/m2a, so this variant easily complies with the renewable energy

requirements. In the case of E1 D3 I, global cost is only 3 % higher than the optimal level. In

the case of E2 D3 M, global cost is even lower than the initial state.

I-1 Existing school building made of precast concrete panels

Here it was once again the most typical variant No 8 with medium-level building

construction improvement and without technical upgrading that proved to be optimal. No

sufficient return is provided by variants No 10 to 13, i.e. the combined application of control,

the replacement of heat transfer appliances, the improvement of the domestic hot water

system, the modernisation of lighting, the installation of a heat recovery air handling system;

for these variants even the global cost of the initial state is lower.

I-2 Existing school building, made of brick

Here, too, it was the most typical variant No 8 with medium-level building construction

improvement and without technical upgrading that proved to be optimal. In the same way

as for I-1 but also including a boiler replacement, technical improvements did not prove to be

cost-effective. For this reference building, a technical improvement simpler than that in

variants 15 to 17 including the replacement of boilers, heating control, the replacement of

Page 11: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

11

heat transfer appliances, modernisation of lighting and control has also been assessed.

Although these variants have not been found to be optimal either, at least their global costs

were lower than those of the initial state.

I-3 New school building made of brick

It is worth mentioning that while the renovation of school buildings referred to in the above

two cases does occur from time to time, the construction of a new school building is

uncommon. Accordingly, there is no such thing as ‘an average new school building’ as with

new residential buildings CSH-6 or TH-3.

True to form, non-transparent building construction to meet medium level requirements was

found to be the optimal level. However, in contrast to the results of other assessments, the

optimal solution for windows proved to be the less stringent variant No 5. This is likely due

to the very high energy efficiency of the initial technical building system.

Although each variant from 9 to 16 is compliant in respect of the Ep value, only those with

the 0.22 package meet the requirements for non-transparent building envelopes. However,

not all of these have a sufficient share of energy from renewable sources. The requirements

for nearly zero-energy buildings are fully complied with by variants 14 and 16. From the two

NZEB variants, No 16 represents the optimal level where the amount of renewable energy

sources required is 14 kWh/m2a and the current amount of renewable energy sources is 19

kWh/m2a.

IR-1 Existing office building made of brick, with rendered facade

Exceptionally, the renovation of the building construction to meet the previous requirements

introduced in 2006, i.e. variant No 7, was found to be the optimal solution. Variants with

technical upgrades including the installation of an air handling system and a heat recovery

system were not optimal in this case either, but at least variants No 10, 11 and 12 provide

lower global costs than the initial state.

IR-2 Existing office building made of brick, with stone-clad facade

As is usual, medium-level improvement package No 8 is considered to be the optimal level.

It is important to note that no facade thermal insulation is installed for this variant. Unlike

for reference building IR-1, the global costs of the initial state are not improved by the

complex upgrading of the technical system.

IR-3 New office building

In the same way as with I-3, an optimal solution was given by variant No 5 to meet medium-

level requirements, which only includes the replacement of non-transparent building

constructions with improved ones. Considering that both I-3 and IR-3 have an advanced

initial technical system, it can be concluded that the optimal solution requires only a slight

Page 12: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

12

improvement in thermal insulation, as compared to the 2006 state. In other words, a less

advantageous technical system calls for better thermal protection, while a modern technical

system only needs medium-level thermal protection to give the optimal level.

The Ep requirements for nearly zero-energy buildings are complied with by variants No 6

and 9 to 13. Out of these variants only No 6, 9, 12 and 13 comply with the requirements for

thermal insulation. However, the requirements for the share of renewable energy sources is

only met by variant No 13 where the amount of renewable energy sources required is

21 kWh/m2a and the current amount of renewable energy sources is 23.1 kWh/m2a.

Summary of the variants To summarise the above chapter, the following conclusions can be drawn:

The improvement of residential buildings

For residential buildings built before 1990, a package with medium-level thermal insulation

and the replacement of windows (1.15/0.35) proved to be the optimal level. In the majority

of cases, variant No 11, in which the improvement of the technical building system is

combined with the modernisation of the building envelope, is the optimal solution. In the

exceptional case of reference building CSH-3 it is assumed that – due to the operation of the

boiler at part load – the optimal solution would in fact be improvement also including a

renovation of the technical building system, but this could not be demonstrated because

operating at part load is not taken into consideration in the Decree. With a high increase in

energy prices and a low discount rate, the installation of solar cells is also advantageous, just

as it was found in the case of CSH-2. From a macroeconomic perspective, the installation of a

solar collector may also be beneficial.

The improvement of institutional buildings

The modernisation of the technical building system and electric system of an institutional

building provided varying levels of effectiveness. In most cases it was not the optimal

solution; such renovations are always advised to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis using

cost-benefit analyses. Other than that, the installation of thermal insulation and the

replacement of windows proved to be optimal. In view of the fact that, in this case,

modernisation is considered to be major refurbishment under the regulations in force, the Ep

requirements must also be met. Therefore, a partial improvement of the technical building

system and electric system may also be necessary.

The compliance of new buildings with NZEB requirements

In respect of the U value, packages including 1.15 windows and 0.22 non-transparent

constructions are able to meet the NZEB specifications. These solutions show optimal values

for certain price models. Ep requirements are discussed in the next chapter. In the context of

the required share of renewable energy sources within a nearly zero-energy building, the

Page 13: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

13

optimal level could be approached and, with the model E2 D3 M, even reached in several

cases primarily through the installation of solar cells. This was partly due to the fact that the

inverter’s assumed lifecycle was increased to 10 years, as it was explained in the section on

reference building CSH-6. Furthermore, the beneficial feed-in tariff is also an important

factor with respect to solar cells. However, a prerequisite for this is that the users of a

building should feed no more electricity back into the network than they use in a year

(balance measurement). The burning of firewood has not been assessed for new buildings;

however, it can be seen from the evaluation of existing buildings that it is also beneficial. The

extra investment cost required to make the optimal solution fully compliant with NZEB

requirements is 5 to 10 % as compared to the construction practice in 2017, not taking wood

burning into consideration.

The relationship between the optimal level of overall energy performance

(Ep value) and the respective requirement

The optimal levels determined for each costing model and reference building are

summarised in Annex 7. Below that, the requirements for each reference building are

presented in the row ‘Ep requirement’.

As described in the Introduction, these requirements include the COR requirements laid

down in Annex 5 to the Decree for each improvement package.

It should be noted that the COR requirements apply to all building permits and simple

notifications submitted after 1 January 2018 or, where these are not necessary, construction

works commenced after that date, in the case of buildings falling within the scope of the

Decree. Accordingly, in addition to the improvement of existing buildings, they also apply to

new buildings.

Meanwhile, the requirements for nearly zero-energy buildings – as set out in Annex 6 to the

Decree – came into force on 1 January 2016. Occupied buildings have to become NZEB by

31 December 2020 or, for buildings to be used or owned by authorities, by 31 December 2018

(the ‘deadline’). Therefore, a building planned to be put into use after the deadline should be

designed and constructed on the basis of NZEB requirements. Having regard to the

imminence of the deadline and the fact that several years may elapse between the designing

of a building and the time it becomes suitable for use, a building is to be designed today to

meet the NZEB requirements. Accordingly, the comparison of new buildings in Annex 7 is

based on the NZEB requirements instead of the COR.

The difference, as a percentage, compared to these requirements is presented in the rows

below each requirement. The model E1 D3 I is used to establish the optimal values, which

are shown in bold. The highest derogation from the optimal level in each case is +6 %, while

the average is -15 %. This means that the requirements typically differ from the optimum in

Page 14: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

14

favour of a lower environmental load and a safe use of resources. Compared to the present

cost-optimal level, the requirements represent 15 % higher energy efficiency, on average. It is

mostly the renovation of school buildings where the required values of energy performance

were found to be too strict.

From the perspective of the assessment, it has to be noted that no thermal insulation was

assumed for reference building IR-2 (a historical office building) due to its ornamental

facade; therefore, the level of renovation of the building envelope is below 25 % and the

project is not considered as ‘major refurbishment’. Accordingly, it is not subject to the Ep

requirement, making it irrelevant from the perspective of the review of that requirement.

In the sensitivity analysis, the 15 % threshold was exceeded for certain reference buildings by

the cost model E2 D3 M (high price increase, low discount rate, macroeconomic approach),

which is the most favourable in terms of energy efficiency measures. Optimal levels with an

energy efficiency exceeding the requirements can also be found for models E1 D3 M and E2

D3 B, mostly due to the variants that include solar cells. For other models, the requirements

represent an energy efficiency greater than the optimal value. In the case of the E1 D3 I

pricing model chosen for the assessment, which is the most typical of today’s conditions,

the requirements comply with the provisions laid down in Articles 4 and 5 of the

Directive for all types.

The optimal level of thermal transmittance (U) and its relation to the

requirements

Annex 8 summarises the optimal values determined by each costing model and reference

building, where optimisation is examined separately for windows and non-transparent

structures. Thus, the optimal level for windows was the one with the lowest global cost out

of variants No 1, 2 and 3.

The optimum for non-transparent structures was represented in the case of renovation by the

variant with the lowest global cost out of variants No 4, 5 and 6, while in the case of new

buildings, variant No 4 was replaced by No 1.

In Hungary, U value requirements are not dependent on either the geometry or the purpose

of the building or on whether the building is renovated or newly built. Furthermore, the

COR and the NZEB provisions uniformly use the same U value requirements. In addition,

only three types of packages per building construction type were assessed for the U value.

For these reasons, the most accurate result is obtained by examining which package is found

to be optimal most often. This is examined in the range ‘Number of optimal cases’ on the

right side of the Table, summarising all the optimal values of the sensitivity analysis.

A weighted average of these values was taken into account when making the comparison

Page 15: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

15

with the requirements. In the case of windows, the variant complying with the requirement

of U=1.15 W/m2K which occurs uniformly for both the COR and the NZEB requirements

was found to be optimal about 1.5 times more frequently than the variant where U=1.4

W/m2K. The 1.4 variant gave the optimal solution for new buildings, due to the favourable

technical facilities of the initial building. A ‘passive house window’ with U=0.8 W/m2K was

not optimal in any of the cases. Accordingly, the weighted average was U=1.24 W/m2K. The

energy efficiency of the U=1.15 W/m2K requirement is 8% higher than this. The assessment

of non-transparent structures shows much larger variance than for windows. The energy

efficiency represented by the weighted average for walls is 42% lower, for slabs (attic, roof)

22% lower and for basement slabs 25% lower than the required value.

Determining a lower U value is not justified as the existing values represent a sufficiently high

energy efficiency. The requirements set out in the Decree for the thermal transmittance factor,

applicable as of 1 January 2018, comply with the provisions laid down in Articles 4 and 5 of

the Directive.

Page 16: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

16

Definitions

package: a set of different architectural or technical measures according to Annexes 3 and 4

EU Regulation: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 244/2012 supplementing

Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the energy

performance of buildings by establishing a comparative methodology framework for

calculating cost-optimal levels of minimum energy performance requirements for buildings

and building elements

thermal protection: the thermal protection of transparent and non-transparent heat transfer

surfaces

major refurbishment: a renovation of at least 25 % of all surfaces of the building envelope

Directive: Directive 2010/31/EU on the energy performance of buildings

NZEB: requirements for nearly zero-energy buildings according to Annex 6 to the Decree

COR: cost-optimal requirements according to Annex 5 to the Decree

Decree: Decree No 7/2006 of the Minister Without Portfolio of 24 May 2006 on the determination of

the energy characteristics of buildings

technical: packages for technical building and electric systems

variant: the modification of the reference building concerned in accordance with one or more packages

Page 17: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 1 – Geometric characteristics

Table 1.1: Reference buildings for existing buildings (major refurbishment)

Existing buildings

Building geometry

Ratio of

windows with

and without sun

exposure on

the building

envelope

Floor space (m2)

Description of building

Description of average building technology

A/V É D K NY according to the

building code heating DHWG

1) Single family buildings and their subcategories

CSH-1 Existing single

family building, loam

1.11

22

22

27

27

So

lar

exp

osu

re is c

alc

ula

ted

in

a s

imp

lifie

d w

ay a

cco

rdin

g t

o D

ecre

e 7

/20

06

. o

f th

e M

inis

ter

With

ou

t P

ort

folio

80

Residential building made of loam and built before

1960

stove

heater, storage type

no manifold, no pump

no manifold

no control

CSH-2 Existing single

family building, brick

1.09

24

24

34

34

90

Residential building made of small-sized solid brick

and built before 1960

wood burning boiler heater, storage type

manifold inside heated

space, 90/70, constant rev. pump

no manifold

1 central controller

CSH-3 Existing single

family building, B30 brick

1.10

27

27

27

27

100

Residential building made of B30 brick and built

between 1960 and 1979

gas convector heater instantaneous water heater

controller with thermostat

CSH-4 Existing single

family building, holed

brick

1.08

37

36

32

33

110

Residential building made of holed brick and built

between 1980 and 1995

boiler, constant temp. combi boiler, constant temp.

manifold inside heated

space, 90/70, constant rev. pump, 1

central controller

indirect heating, storage type

CSH-5 Existing single

family building Porotherm

250

0.94

54

54

125

140

250

Residential building made of Porotherm brick

and built after 1995

boiler, constant temp. combi boiler, constant temp.

manifold inside heated space, 70/55,

constant rev. pump, 1 central controller

indirect heating, storage type

TH-1 Existing apartment

block, ten-storey, precast

concrete panels

0.28

9140

55

1455

1505

22075

10-storey apartment block made of precast concrete

panels and built between 1960 and 1995

manifold inside heated space, 90/70,

constant rev. pump, central controller

indirect heating, storage type

TH-2 Existing apartment

block, outside corridor

0.77

786

154

303

1772

Downtown apartment block with patio and outside corridor built between 1960 and 1995

gas convector heater heater, storage type controller

with thermostat

IR-1 Existing office

building, suitable for

thermal insulation

0.24

2468

2408

1853

1985

18163

Office building made of brick with rendered façade and

built between 1960 and 1995

constant temp. boiler, manifold inside

heated space, 90/70,

constant temp. boiler, indirect heating, storage type

constant rev. pump, 1 central controller,

no air handling system

IR-2 Existing office

building, not suitable for

thermal insulation

0.24

1238

2095

1507

1589

13281

Office building made of brick, with stone cladding and

built between 1960 and 1995

steam boiler, without control, no circulation,

no air handling system

steam boiler, constant temp. boiler, electric, instantaneous

I-1 Existing school building, precast concrete panels

0.56

719

729

356

347

2880

City school building made of precast concrete

panels and built between 1960 and 1995

district heating, manifold inside heated

space, 70/55, constant rev. pump, central

controller, no air handling system

electric, instantaneous

I-2 Existing school building, brick

0.79

83

246

84

242

845

Town school building made of brick and built

between 1960 and 1995

steam boiler, without control, no circulation,

no air handling system

steam boiler, constant temp. boiler, electric, instantaneous

Page 18: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 1 – Geometric characteristics

Table 1.2: Reference buildings for new buildings

New buildings

Building geometry

[1]

Ratio of windows with

and without sun

exposure on the

building envelope

Floor

space

(m2)

Description of building

Description of average building technology

Requirements at component level

A/V

N

S

E

W

according

to the

building

code

heating

DHWG

Required values for thermal transmittance factor

Building envelop

Required value for thermal transmittance

U[W/m2K]

1) Single family buildings and their subcategories

External wall 0.45

CSH-6 New single family building Porotherm

120

1.251

37.8

32.4

42

55.1

Solar exposure is

calculated in a

simplified way

according to the

Decree 7/2006 of the

Minister Without

Portfolio

120

Newly built

building made of

Porotherm brick

condensing

boiler

condensing

combi boiler Flat roof 0.25

manifold inside

heated space,

55/45, constant

rev. pump,

thermostatic

valves

indirect heating, storage type Attic slab 0.3

Structures delimiting heated space

0.25

2) Multifamily buildings and apartment blocks and their subcategories Lower closing slab above arcade 0.25

Lower closing slab above unheated basement

0.5

TH-3 New multifamily building

0.771

102

93.8

212.3

197.1

Solar exposure is

calculated in a

simplified way

according to the

Decree 7/2006 of the

Minister Without

Portfolio

447.7

Newly built

building made of

Porotherm brick

condensing combi

boiler, manifold

inside heated

space, 55/45,

constant rev.

pump,

thermostatic

valves

condensing combi boiler,

indirect heating, storage type

Glazed facade doors, windows

(with frame made of wood or PVC)

1.4

Glazed facade doors, windows (with frame made of metal)

2

Glazed facade doors, windows, if

its nominal surface is less than

0.5 m2

2.5

3) Offices and their subcategories Glass facade 1.5

Flat roof window 2.5

IR-3 New office building. brick

0.313099

1233.6

1587.8

923.7

1517.4

Solar exposure is

calculated in a

simplified way

according to the

Decree 7/2006 of the

Minister Without

Portfolio

10891

Modern office

building built

after 2006

55/45 inside

heated space,

pump with

governor,

electronic control

opt. func., no

storage

condensing combi boiler,

indirect heating, storage type

Roof window

1.7

heating and air

handling system

installed

Gate on façade without glazing

3

4) Other: school buildings Door on façade or between heated an unheated spaces

1.8

Wall heated an unheated spaces 0.5

I-3 New school building, brick

0.426102

261.8

207

306.3

293.4

Solar exposure is

calculated in a

simplified way

according to the

Decree 7/2006 of the

Minister Without

Portfolio

2709

Modern school

building built

after 2006

pump with

governor, 1

central controller,

no storage, air

handling system,

heating installed

condensing boiler, indirect

heating, storage type, with

circulation

Wall between adjacent heated buildings

1.5

pump with

governor, 1

central controller,

no storage, air

handling system,

heating

rapid water heater,

electric

Wall with contact to the ground between 0 and 1 m

0.45

Floor lying on the ground in a 1.5 m wide strip along the perimeter (can be replaced by heat insulation

0.5

Page 19: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

installed with the same resistance installed on the base)

Page 20: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 3 – Packages for building constructions

Variants Content

U value, W/m2K

wall flat roof attic sloping roof

arcade basement heated unheated

wall

window, door

wall roof window

flat roof window

glass roof

ren

ova

tio

n o

f b

uild

ing

co

nstr

uctio

n o

nly

1. replacement of windows only (1.4) Windows with aut. ventilator. double glazing. no shades for residential buildings

1.4 1.5 1.7 2.5

2. replacement of windows only (1.15) Windows with aut. ventilator. double glazing. no shades for residential buildings

1.15 1.5 1.4 2 1.6

3. replacement of windows only (0.8) Windows with aut. ventilator. double glazing. no shades for residential buildings

0.8 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.3

4. thermal insulation only (0.45) Thermal insulation in various thicknesses to meet the criteria. Λ=0.03-0.04.

0.45 0.25 0.3 0.25 0.25 0.5 0.5

5. thermal insulation only (0.35) Thermal insulation in various thicknesses to meet the criteria, Λ=0.03-0.04.

0.35 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3

6. thermal insulation only (0.2) Thermal insulation in various thicknesses to meet the criteria, Λ=0.03-0.04.

0.2 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.22 0.22

7. complex building construction (1.4 / 0.45) Along with packages 1 and 4 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.25 0.25 0.5 0.5 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.5

8. complex building construction (1.15 / 0.35) Along with packages 2 and 5 0.35 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.15 1.5 1.4 2 1.6

9. complex building construction (0.8 / 0.2) Along with packages 3 and 6 0.2 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.22 0.22 0.8 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.3

co

mp

lex r

en

ova

tio

n 10. complex renovation of building

construction and technical building

system (1.4 / 0.45)

package No 7 with modern technical building system

according to the calculation 0.45 0.25 0.3 0.25 0.25 0.5 0.5 1.4 1.5 1.7 2.5

11. complex renovation of building construction and technical building system (1.15 / 0.35)

package No 8 with modern technical building system according to the calculation

0.35 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 1.15 1.5 1.4 2 1.6

12. complex renovation of building construction and technical building system (0.8 / 0.2)

package No 9 with modern technical building system according to the calculation 0.2 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.22 0.22 0.8 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.3

12a. complex renovation of building construction and technical building system (1.0 / 0.2)

the same as package No 12 but the U value of doors and windows is 1.0

0.2 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.22 0.22 1.0 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.3

Page 21: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 4 – Technical building system packages

Same as the table submitted in 2013 Residential buildings

GL 1

Heating Wood gasification boiler 70/55 water temp., thermostatic valves (2K), with storage option (55/45)

boiler installation, control, heat transfer system installation

Hot water Wood gasification boiler solid fuel cylinder, without circulation, indirect heating, storage option

hot water system installation

GL 2

Heating Condensing boiler 55/45 inside heated space, pump with governor, electronic control opt. func., no storage

boiler installation, control, heat transfer system installation

Hot water Condensing combi boiler with storage option without circulation, indirect heating without circulation, storage type

GL 3

Heating Condensing boiler 55/45 inside heated space, pump with governor, electronic control, opt. func., no storage

boiler replacement, control Hot water Condensing combi boiler with storage option without circulation, indirect heating without circulation,

storage option

GL4

Heating

Heat pump heating system, with ground collector 55/45

55/45 inside heated space, pump with governor,

electronic control opt. func., no storage

heat pump system installation, control

permanent boiler

Hot water

Heat pump heating system, geothermal source 55/45

indirect heating, storage type, with circulation

heat pump system installation, control

permanent boiler

GL 5

solar collector system installation indirect heating, storage type

GL 6 solar cell system installation

GL7

Heating Pellet burning boiler 70/55 water temp., thermostatic valves (2K), with storage option (55/45)

boiler installation, control, heat transfer system installation

Hot water Pellet burning boiler solid fuel cylinder, without circulation, indirect heating, storage type

hot water system installation

GL 8

Heating district heating 90/70 water temp., thermostatic valves (2K) control system installation, linking section installation

Hot water district heating district heating with storage option, with circulation hot water system improvement

GL 9

Heating Constant temp. boiler manifold inside heated space, constant rev. pump, thermostatic valves

boiler type upgrade, control

Hot water Constant temp. boiler without circulation, indirect heating, storage type

GL 10

Air handling system

fresh air blast installation each room is controlled separately air handling system installation, heat recovery ventilation 85 %

Institutions

Page 22: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

GI-5

Heating Condensing boiler 55/45 inside heated space, pump with governor, electronic control opt. func., no storage

boiler replacement, control, heat transfer system renovation, thermal insulation

Hot water Condensing boiler, electric, instantaneous indirect heating, storage type, with circulation hot water system renovation, thermal insulation

Air handling system

fresh air blast installation each room is controlled separately air handling system installation, heat recovery ventilation 85% installation

Cooling central cooling system COP3 central cooling system installation (instead of splits), each room is controlled separately

Lighting lighting upgrade, control, light fixtures

replacement

GI-8

Heating Condensing boiler 55/45 inside heated space, pump with governor, electronic control opt. func., no storage

boiler replacement, control, heat transfer system renovation

Hot water Condensing boiler

Lighting each room is controlled separately, adapted to natural

lighting, controlled by presence sensor lighting upgrade, control, light fixtures replacement

GI-1

Heating district heating 90/70 water temp., thermostatic valves (2K) control system installation, time controllers thermovalves, heat transfer appliances replacement

Hot water electric, instantaneous permanent -

Air handling system

fresh air blast installation each room is controlled separately air handling system installation, heat recovery ventilation 85 %

Lighting each room is controlled separately, adapted to natural

lighting, controlled by presence sensor lighting upgrade, control

GI-1-V solar cells installation current gain

GI-2

Heating Condensing boiler 55/45 inside heated space, pump with governor, electronic control opt. func., no storage

boiler replacement, control, heat transfer system upgrade

Hot water Condensing boiler

Air handling system

fresh air blast system renovation each room is controlled separately air handling system installation, heat recovery ventilation 85 %

Lighting each room is controlled separately, adapted to natural

lighting, controlled by presence sensor lighting upgrade, control

GI-2-V solar cells installation current gain

GI-3

Heating Condensing boiler 55/45 inside heated space, pump with governor, electronic control opt. func., no storage

control,

Hot water Condensing boiler indirect heating, storage type, with circulation hot water system renovation Air handling system

fresh air blast renovation each room is controlled separately heat recovery appliance 85 %

Lighting lighting upgrade, control GI-3-V solar cells installation current gain

GI-4

Heating Heat pump heating system, with ground collector 55/45

55/45 inside heated space, pump with governor, electronic control opt. func., no storage

new heat generator, control, heat transfer system renovation

Hot water Condensing boiler indirect heating, storage type, with circulation hot water system renovation, thermal insulation

Air handling system

fresh air blast renovation each room is controlled separately new heat recovery appliance 85%

Lighting lighting upgrade, control GI-4-V solar cells installation current gain

GI-7

Heating Condensing boiler 55/45 inside heated space, pump with governor, electronic control opt. func., no storage

control, heat transfer system renovation, thermal insulation

Hot water Condensing boiler indirect heating, storage type, with circulation

Air handling system

fresh air blast renovation each room is controlled separately air handling system renovation, new heat recovery appliance 85%

Cooling central cooling system COP3 central cooling system installation (instead of splits), each room is controlled separately

Lighting lighting upgrade, control, light fixtures

replacement

GI-7-V solar cells installation current gain

Page 23: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 5 – Investment costs

Façade thermal insulation* (HUF/m2) 6 cm 8 cm 10 cm 12 cm

single family buildings EPS 9 750 10 790 11 440 11 960

apartment blocks and multifamily buildings / institutions, brick, EPS 10 920 11 570 12 090 12 480

apartment blocks and multifamily buildings, precast concrete panels EPS 16 120 16 900 17 680

apartment blocks and multifamily buildings, precast concrete panels, rock-wool 20 956 21 970 22 984

* system price, gross, including labour and other additional costs

Attic slab thermal insulation* (HUF/m2)

5 cm 10 cm 15 cm 20 cm 25 cm

glass wool in roll 520 1 040 1 560 2 210 2 730

* gross

Basement slab thermal insulation* (HUF/m2) 5 cm 7 cm 8 cm 12 cm 16 cm

EPS 3 120 4 160 4 680 5 850 8 060

* system price, gross, including labour and other additional costs

Doors and windows* (HUF/m2)

material inc. labour

U=1.4 31 000 38 600

U=1.15 35 000 44 000

U=0.8 75 000 88 500

* gross prices

Brick* (HUF/m2) PTH44TProfi PTH44K PTH38K PTH44HS PTH38N+F

Wienerberger 24 624 9 690 8 892 9 120 7 638

* gross prices

Heating systems* (HUF) Residential buildings condensing boiler (18 kW) and system installation including mounting and controls 1 070 000

condensing boiler (18 kW) and system installation including mounting and controls, chimney casing 1 605 000

condensing boiler (18 kW) boiler replacement only 374 500

condensing boiler (18 kW) boiler replacement and chimney casing only 909 500

condensing boiler (24 kW) and system installation including mounting and controls 1 198 400

condensing boiler (24 kW) and system installation including mounting and controls, chimney casing 1 733 400

condensing boiler (24 kW) boiler replacement only 502 900

wood gasification boiler (18 kW) and system installation including mounting and controls 1 284 000

wood gasification boiler (18 kW) and system installation including mounting and controls, chimney casing 1 819 000

wood gasification boiler (18 kW) boiler replacement only 535 000

wood gasification boiler (24 kW) and system installation including mounting and controls, chimney casing 1 947 400

wood gasification boiler (24 kW) boiler replacement only 663 400

pellet boiler system (18 kW) including mounting and controls 3 745 000

heat pump system (18 kW) including mounting and controls + surface heating 7 383 000

heat transfer appliances including mounting and fittings ** 208 650

conversion of district heating system to support individual control (HUF/apartment) 139 100

solar collector*** including mounting and controls, with storage option, in single family building (4 m2) 1 070 000

solar collector*** including mounting and controls, with storage option, in single family building (6 m2) 1 391 000

solar collector*** including mounting and controls, with storage option, in single family building (8 m2) 1 712 000

solar collector*** including mounting and controls, with storage option, in single family building (10 m2) 1 926 000

solar collector**** including mounting and controls, with storage option in multifamily buildings/blocks (HUF/apartment)

321 000

heat recovery ventilation installation in single family building 1 070 000

heat recovery ventilation installation in multifamily buildings/blocks 856 000

filter element replacement in heat recovery appliance (HUF/apartment, every 6 months) 10 000

antifreeze replacement in solar collector, single family building (HUF) every 4 years 25 000

antifreeze replacement in solar collector, in multifamily buildings/blocks (HUF) every 4 years 2 300 000

Institutions

condensing boiler including mounting and controls (HUF/m2) 4 280

radiator heating system renovation (HUF/m2) 2 247

cooling system installation (HUF/m2) 3 531

cooling system installation (HUF/m2) 3 531

building surveillance system (HUF/m2) 3 317

lighting system upgrade (HUF/m2) 5 350

ventilation pipeline network installation, air handling and heat recovery appliance (HUF/m2) 26 750

filter element replacement in heat recovery appliance (HUF/m2, every 6 months) 75

heat pump (85 kW) 8 881 000

* gross prices, rounded

** depending on the number of rooms

*** to supply 60% of domestic hot water

**** to supply 30% of domestic hot water

Sources: Építőipari Költségbecslési Segédlet (Guidelines for

evaluating costs in the construction industry) 2013 Study Terc VIP Gold

Own collection

* gross prices, rounded

Solar cell systems* (HUF) 2 kW 1 358 900

3 kW 2 889 000

6 kW 4 280 000

8,5 kW 5 350 000

10 kW 6 420 000

30 kW 19 260 000

inverter replacement, 3 kW system, every 10 years 350 000

inverter replacement, 3 kW system, every 10 years 400 000

inverter replacement, 6 kW system, every 10 years 800 000

inverter replacement, 8.5 kW system, every 10 years 1 000 000

inverter replacement, 10 kW system, every 10 years 1 200 000

inverter replacement, 30 kW system, every 10 years 3 600 000

Page 24: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 6 – Determining energy demand and global costs

CSH-1

original state

building construction complex building construction and technical building system

technical building system

complex

1. window

repl. only (1.4)

2. window

repl. only (1.15)

3. window

repl. only (0.8)

4. thermal

insulation

only (0.45)

5. thermal

insulation

only (0.35)

6. thermal

insulation

only (0.20.22)

7. complex

building

construction

(1.4 / 0.45)

8. complex

building

construction

(1.15 / 0.35)

9. complex

building

construction

(0.8 / 0.20.22)

10. complex

building

construction,

technical building system (1.4 /

0.45)

11. complex

building

construction,

technical building system (1.15 /

0.35)

12. complex

building

construction,

technical building system (0.8 /

0.20.22)

13. technical building system only

14. 1.4 window

and technical

building

system

construction material type loam brick

improvement of

building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.45 W/m2K

(facade), U=0,3

W/m2K

(attic slab), U=0,5

W/m2K

(basement slab)

improvement of

building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.35 W/m2K

(facade), U=0.2

W/m2K

(attic slab), U=0,3

W/m2K

(basement slab)

improvement of

building envelope

efficiency to U=0.2

W/m2K (facade),

U=0,14 W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0.20.22

W/m2K

(basement slab)

measure

package 7 +

GL1

measure

package 8 +

GL1

measure

package 9 +

GL1

measure 1 +

GL1

construction time before 1960

size (m2) 80

number of floors 0 GL1

headroom (m) 2.7

basement no

number of rooms 2

Wood gasification Wood gasification Wood

gasification Wood gasification Wood gasification

stove boiler boiler boiler boiler boiler

Heating system type no manifold,

no pump repl. of all doors,

windows with

U=1.4 W/m2K

repl. of all doors,

windows with

U=1.15 W/m2K

repl. of all doors,

windows with

U=0.8 W/m2K

Measures 1 and

4 combined

Measures 2 and

5 combined

Measures 3 and

6 combined

70/55 water temp., thermostatic valves (2K), with storage option (55/45)

no control

energy carrier used firewood firewood firewood firewood firewood firewood

Wood gasification

Wood gasification

Wood

gasification

Wood gasification

Wood gasification

DHWG system type heater, storage

type boiler boiler boiler boiler boiler

no manifold solid fuel cylinder, without circulation, indirect heating, storage type

electricity

energy carrier used (daytime) firewood firewood firewood firewood firewood

layout rectangle

boiler installation, control, system installation, heat transfer appliances installation, hot water system

A/V 1.113

Ep (kWh/m2a) 374 316 314 311 292 278 262 187 177 165 143 132 121 255 205

Heating (kWh/m2a) 289 231 229 226 207 193 177 102 92 80 94 84 73 207 157

Domestic hot water (kWh/m2a) 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 48 48 48 48 48

Ventilation (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooling (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lighting (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Natural gas (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Biomass (kWh/a) 38549 30821 30514 30121 27591 25737 23605 13636 12259 10726 18128 16739 15242 33140 26525

District heating (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Electricity (kWh/a) 2710 2710 2710 2710 2710 2710 2710 2710 2710 2710 210 210 210 210 210

Investment costs (HUF) 0 414 772 472 392 959 572 1 128 850 1 241 286 1 765 616 1 543 622 1 713 678 2 725 188 3 036 272 3 206 328 4 217 838 1 492 650 2 045 679

Residual value 103 693 118 098 239 893 282 212 310 321 441 404 385 905 428 419 681 297 1 132 230 1 174 744 1 427 622 746 325 884 582

Initial maintenance 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000

Initial biomass fee (HUF/a) 379 706 303 586 300 560 296 694 271 768 253 506 232 509 134 316 120 754 105 650 178 563 164 879 150 130 326 430 261 266

Initial electricity fee (HUF/a) 100 541 100 541 100 541 100 541 100 541 100 541 100 541 100 541 100 541 100 541 7 791 7 791 7 791 7 791 7 791

Investment (HUF/m2) 5 185 5 905 11 995 14 111 15 516 22 070 19 295 21 421 34 065 37 953 40 079 52 723 18 658 25 571

Savings costs (HUF/kWh) 89 98 190 172 161 197 103 109 163 164 166 208 157 152

Static payback time (a) 5 6 12 10 10 12 6 7 10 10 10 13 10 10

Static global costs (HUF) 14 617 422 12 748 593 12 715 413 13 086 627 12 508 133 12 072 684 11 967 109 8 799 322 8 562 521 9 120 923 8 836 905 8 596 415 9 165 472 11 729 288 10 327 402

E1 D3 I (HUF) 11 364 112 9 993 981 9 976 507 10 326 317 9 907 769 9 590 673 9 581 563 7 132 980 6 975 390 7 539 587 7 072 216 6 911 810 7 484 142 9 069 830 8 075 018

E2 D3 I (HUF) 13 150 058 11 533 811 11 506 551 11 843 862 11 344 723 10 968 578 10 891 580 8 125 512 7 924 073 8 439 436 7 692 819 7 488 166 8 012 812 10 168 527 8 963 022

E1 D5 I (HUF) 8 994 250 8 011 762 8 011 617 8 402 830 8 112 775 7 889 285 8 006 201 6 022 395 5 938 349 6 622 756 6 377 953 6 291 686 6 982 509 7 588 173 6 934 432

E2 D5 I (HUF) 10 243 870 9 088 773 9 081 765 9 464 212 9 117 637 8 852 734 8 922 037 6 715 571 6 600 772 7 250 930 6 812 974 6 695 676 7 353 055 8 358 495 7 556 989

E1 D3 M (HUF) 9 273 945 8 195 102 8 181 343 8 456 784 8 127 219 7 877 537 7 870 364 5 942 346 5 818 259 6 262 509 5 593 923 5 467 619 5 918 273 7 166 847 6 383 530

E2 D3 M (HUF) 10 680 202 9 407 567 9 386 102 9 651 702 9 258 679 8 962 501 8 901 873 6 723 867 6 565 253 6 971 051 6 082 587 5 921 442 6 334 550 8 031 962 7 082 746

E1 D5 M (HUF) 7 407 913 6 634 300 6 634 186 6 942 227 6 713 838 6 537 861 6 629 921 5 067 870 5 001 692 5 540 594 5 047 259 4 979 332 5 523 287 6 000 188 5 485 431

Page 25: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

E2 D5 M (HUF) 8 391 865 7 482 340 7 476 822 7 777 962 7 505 068 7 296 482 7 351 052 5 613 677 5 523 284 6 035 220 5 389 795 5 297 434 5 815 055 6 606 741 5 975 633

E1 D3 I (HUF/m2) 142 051 124 925 124 706 129 079 123 847 119 883 119 770 89 162 87 192 94 245 88 403 86 398 93 552 113 373 100 938

E2 D3 I (HUF/m2) 164 376 144 173 143 832 148 048 141 809 137 107 136 145 101 569 99 051 105 493 96 160 93 602 100 160 127 107 112 038

E1 D5 I (HUF/m2) 112 428 100 147 100 145 105 035 101 410 98 616 100 078 75 280 74 229 82 784 79 724 78 646 87 281 94 852 86 680

E2 D5 I (HUF/m2) 128 048 113 610 113 522 118 303 113 970 110 659 111 525 83 945 82 510 90 637 85 162 83 696 91 913 104 481 94 462

E1 D3 M (HUF/m2) 115 924 102 439 102 267 105 710 101 590 98 469 98 380 74 279 72 728 78 281 69 924 68 345 73 978 89 586 79 794

E2 D3 M (HUF/m2) 133 503 117 595 117 326 120 646 115 733 112 031 111 273 84 048 82 066 87 138 76 032 74 018 79 182 100 400 88 534

E1 D5 M (HUF/m2) 92 599 82 929 82 927 86 778 83 923 81 723 82 874 63 348 62 521 69 257 63 091 62 242 69 041 75 002 68 568

E2 D5 M (HUF/m2) 104 898 93 529 93 460 97 225 93 813 91 206 91 888 70 171 69 041 75 440 67 372 66 218 72 688 82 584 74 695

Page 26: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 6 – Determining energy demand and global costs

CSH-2

original state

building construction complex building construction and technical building system technical building system

complex

1. window

repl. only (1.4)

2. window

repl. only

(1.15)

3.

window repl.

only (0.8)

4. thermal

insulation

only (0.45)

5. thermal

insulation

only (0.35)

6. thermal

insulation

only

(0.20.22)

7. complex

building

construction(1.4

/ 0.45)

8. complex

building

construction(1.

15 / 0.35)

9. complex

building

construction(

0.8 /0.20.22)

10.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building system (1.4 / 0.45)

11.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building

system (1.15/ 0.35)

12.

comple

x

buildin

g

constru

ction,

technical building system (0.8 / 0.2 / gas)

13.

comple

x

building

constru

ction,

technical building system (0.8 / 0.2 / bivalent)

14.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building

system (1.15

/ 0.35 / wood)

15.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building system (0.8

/ 0.2 / wood)

16.

complex

building

constru

ction,

technica

l

building

system

(1.15/

0.35 /

wood +

solar

coll.)

17.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building system (0.8 / 0.2 / wood + solar coll.)

18.

technical

building

system only

(wood +

solar coll.)

19. 11. PV: 2

kWp 16.5 m2 8

solar cells 30

degrees south

10% shade

efficiency: 2160

construction material type small-sized brick (50)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.45

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,3 W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0,5 W/m2K

(basement

slab)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.35

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0.2 W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0,3 W/m2K

(basement

slab)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.2 W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,14 W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0.20.22

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

measure

package 7 +

GL2

measure

package 8 +

GL2

measure

package

9 + GL2

measure

package 9

+ GL4 +

GL5

measure

package 8 +

GL1

measure

package 9 +

GL1

measure

package 8 +

GL1 +

GL5

measure

package 9 +

GL1 +

GL5

GL1 + GL5

measure

package 8 +

GL2 +

GL6

construction time before 1960

size (m2) 90

number of floors 0

headroom (m) 2.7

basement no

number of rooms 3 with

ground collector

condensing condensing condensing heat pump

Wood gasification

Wood gasification

Wood gasification

Wood gasification

Wood gasification

condensing

boiler boiler boiler (80%) + original

boiler boiler boiler boiler boiler boiler

Heating system type wood burning boiler fa boiler

(20%)

manifold inside heated space, 90/70, constant rev. pump

55/45 inside heated space, rev. control pump, electronic

control opt. func., no storage

70/55 water temp., thermostatic valves (2K), with storage option (55/45)

55/45..

1 central controller repl. of all

doors,

windows with

U=1.4

W/m2K

repl. of all

doors, windows

with U=1.15

W/m2K

repl. of all

doors,

windows

with U=0.8

W/m2K

Measures 1 and

4 combined

Measures 2

and 5

combined

Measures 3

and 6

combined

natural gas

natural gas

natural gas

geotariffs

electricity firewood firewood firewood + solar energy natural gas

energy carrier used firewood

DHWG system type

heater, storage type

condensing

combi

boiler

condensing

combi

boiler

condens

ing

combi

boiler

heat pump

with ground

collector,

solar

collector system

Wood

gasific

ation

boiler

Wood

gasific

ation

boiler

Wood

gasification

boiler +

solar coll.

Wood

gasification

boiler + solar

coll.

Wood

gasification

boiler + solar

coll.

condensing

combi boiler

circulation,

solid fuel cylinder,

no manifold without circulation, indirect heating, storage type

indirect heating

without circulation, indirect heating

without circulation, indirect heating, storage type

without circulation

storage storage

geotariffs

natural gas natural gas natural gas

electricity, firewood firewood firewood + solar energy natural gas

energy carrier used Electricity (daytime) solar energy

heat pump, boiler replacement,

control, heat transfer

appliances installation, hot

water system installation

control,

layout

rectangle

boiler replacement, control, heat

transfer appliances installation,

hot water system installation

heat

transfer

applian

ces

installat

ion, hot water

boiler replacement, control, heat transfer

appliances installation, hot water system 4

m2 solar collector installation

boiler replacement..

A/V 1.094

system

Ep (kWh/m2a) 389 342 340 337 284 275 256 232 214 200 164 146 135 81 127 118 100 92 220 86

Heating (kWh/m2a) 309 262 260 257 204 195 176 152 134 120 112 94 82 52 81 73 81 73 201 94

Domestic hot water (kWh/m2a) 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 52 52 52 29 46 46 19 19 19 52

Ventilation (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooling (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lighting (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 27: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Natural gas (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14098 12505 11436 3006 0 0 0 0 0 12505

Biomass (kWh/a) 45539 38426 38121 37711 29767 28407 25617 22028 19273 17130 0 0 0 0 18000 16775 13912 12687 31889 0

District heating (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Electricity (kWh/a) 3083 3083 3083 3083 3083 3083 3083 3083 3083 3083 270 270 270 1700 240 240 260 260 260 -1890

Investment costs (HUF) 0 414 772 472 392 959 572 1 337 028 1 521 911 2 245 662 1 751 800 1 994 303 3 205 232 3 485 200 3 727 703 4 938 632 13 298 979

3 655 019 4 697 882 4 723 949 5 766 812 2 561 580 5 254 669

Residual value 103 693 118 098 239 893 334 257 380 478 561 415 437 950 498 576 801 308 1 304 650 1 365 276 1 668 008 3 998 845

1 286 917 1 547 633 1 821 382 2 082 098 1 280 790 2 086 742

Initial maintenance 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 14 000 14 000 14 000 42 000

Initial biomass fee (HUF/a) 448 562 378 496 375 487 371 456 293 209 279 808 252 327 216 979 189 840 168 728 166 360 147 561 134 944 35 475

177 296 165 233 137 029 124 966 314 103 0

Initial electricity fee (HUF/a) 114 371 114 371 114 371 114 371 114 371 114 371 114 371 114 371 114 371 114 371 10 017 10 017 10 017 63 073

8 904 8 904 9 646 9 646 9 646 -70 119

Investment (HUF/m2) 4 609 5 249 10 662 14 856 16 910 24 952 19 464 22 159 35 614 38 724 41 419 54 874 147

766 40 611 52 199 52 488 64 076 28 462 58 385

Savings costs (HUF/kWh) 97 106 204 141 148 188 124 127 188 172 171 216 479 155 193 181 215 168 193

Static payback time (a) 6 6 12 9 9 11 8 8 11 9 9 12 29 10 12 12 14 11 9

Static global costs (HUF) 17 098 005 15 410 783 15 378 149 15 744 383 13 774 431 13 557 287 13 456 592 11 902 291 11 330 624 11 908 210 8 986 510 8 665 053 9 497 448 16 465 402

9 451 033 10 132 006 9 544 187 10 225 160 12 694 058 4 411 099

E1 D3 I (HUF) 13 279 181 12 047 691 12 030 634 12 376 642 10 924 226 10 783 663 10 805 468 9 551 567 9 148 215 9 754 247 7 226 937 7 014 597 7 815 152 14 259 836

7 627 126 8 289 171 7 787 647 8 449 691 9 897 470 7 343 124

E2 D3 I (HUF) 15 364 549 13 906 515 13 879 730 14 212 704 12 507 294 12 323 403 12 256 352 10 888 162 10 397 062 10 934 835 7 820 443 7 547 321 8 307 080 14 724 747

8 249 813 8 872 854 8 284 257 8 907 298 10 966 610 7 430 894

E1 D5 I (HUF) 10 502 888 9 629 749 9 629 933 10 018 147 8 961 926 8 894 819 9 083 318 7 977 443 7 716 705 8 481 307 6 612 064 6 501 982 7 420 010 14 499 327

6 961 927 7 730 929 7 412 966 8 181 967 8 565 239 7 389 476

E2 D5 I (HUF) 11 962 100 10 930 079 10 923 441 11 302 513 10 068 860 9 971 366 10 097 548 8 911 519 8 589 241 9 305 971 7 028 016 6 875 307 7 764 722 14 823 552

7 398 377 8 140 025 7 760 973 8 502 620 9 314 779 7 453 066

E1 D3 M (HUF) 10 826 694 9 857 016 9 843 585 10 116 033 8 972 398 8 861 719 8 878 888 7 891 565 7 573 964 8 051 155 6 665 692 6 391 967 6 950 823 11 633 647

6 034 467 6 555 761 6 163 266 6 684 560 7 824 543 6 390 951

E2 D3 M (HUF) 12 468 715 11 320 657 11 299 567 11 561 751 10 218 909 10 074 112 10 021 316 8 944 002 8 557 308 8 980 752 7 133 020 6 811 435 7 338 168 11 999 718

6 524 771 7 015 355 6 554 297 7 044 881 8 666 386 6 460 061

E1 D5 M (HUF) 8 640 636 7 953 125 7 953 270 8 258 950 7 427 280 7 374 440 7 522 864 6 652 097 6 446 791 7 048 840 6 181 540 5 988 333 6 639 687 11 822 222

5 510 688 6 116 201 5 868 241 6 473 754 6 775 543 6 427 449

E2 D5 M (HUF) 9 789 622 8 977 007 8 971 780 9 270 262 8 298 882 8 222 115 8 321 471 7 387 589 7 133 827 7 698 182 6 509 062 6 282 290 6 911 115 12 077 518

5 854 349 6 438 324 6 142 262 6 726 237 7 365 731 6 477 519

E1 D3 I (HUF/m2) 147 546 133 863 133 674 137 518 121 380 119 818 120 061 106 129 101 647 108 381 80 299 77 940 86 835 158

443 84 746 92 102 86 529 93 885 109 972 81 590

E2 D3 I (HUF/m2) 170 717 154 517 154 219 157 919 138 970 136 927 136 182 120 980 115 523 121 498 86 894 83 859 92 301 163

608 91 665 98 587 92 047 98 970 121 851 82 565

E1 D5 I (HUF/m2) 116 699 106 997 106 999 111 313 99 577 98 831 100 926 88 638 85 741 94 237 73 467 72 244 82 445 161

104 77 355 85 899 82 366 90 911 95 169 82 105

E2 D5 I (HUF/m2) 132 912 121 445 121 372 125 583 111 876 110 793 112 195 99 017 95 436 103 400 78 089 76 392 86 275 164

706 82 204 90 445 86 233 94 474 103 498 82 812

E1 D3 M (HUF/m2) 120 297 109 522 109 373 112 400 99 693 98 464 98 654 87 684 84 155 89 457 74 063 71 022 77 231 129

263 67 050 72 842 68 481 74 273 86 939 71 011

E2 D3 M (HUF/m2) 138 541 125 785 125 551 128 464 113 543 111 935 111 348 99 378 95 081 99 786 79 256 75 683 81 535 133

330 72 497 77 948 72 826 78 276 96 293 71 778

E1 D5 M (HUF/m2) 96 007 88 368 88 370 91 766 82 525 81 938 83 587 73 912 71 631 78 320 68 684 66 537 73 774 131

358 61 230 67 958 65 203 71 931 75 284 71 416

E2 D5 M (HUF/m2) 108 774 99 745 99 686 103 003 92 210 91 357 92 461 82 084 79 265 85 535 72 323 69 803 76 790 134

195 65 048 71 537 68 247 74 736 81 841 71 972

Page 28: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 6 – Determining energy demand and global costs

CSH-3

original state

building construction complex building construction and technical building system technical building system

1. window

repl. only (1.4)

2. window

repl. only

(1.15)

3. window

repl. only (0.8)

4. thermal

insulation

only (0.45)

5. thermal

insulation

only (0.35)

6. thermal

insulation

only

(0.20.22)

7. complex

building

construction(1

.4 /

0.45)

8.

complex

building

constructio

n(1.15 /

0.35)

9. complex

building

construction(0

.8 /

0.20.22)

10.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building system

(1.4 /

0.45)

11.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building system

(1.15

/ 0.35)

12.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building system

(0.8 /

0.20.22)

13.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building system

(0.8 /

0.20.22)

14.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building system

(0.8 /

0.20.22)

15.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building system

(0.8 /

0.20.22)

17.

technic

al

building

system

only

18.

techni

cal

buildin

g

syste

m only

19.

techni

cal

buildin

g

syste

m

only

construction material type

brick (B30)

repl. of all

doors, windows

with U=1.4

W/m2K

repl. of all

doors,

windows with

U=1.15 W/m2K

repl. of all

doors, windows

with U=0.8

W/m2K

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.45

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,3 W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0,5 W/m2K

(basement slab)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.35

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0.2 W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0,3 W/m2K

(basement slab)

improvemen

t of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.2

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,14

W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0.20.22

W/m2K

(basement slab)

Measures 1

and 4

combined

Measures

2 and 5

combine

d

Measures 3

and 6

combined

measure

package 7 +

GL2

measure

package 8, +

GL2

measure

package 9, +

GL2

measure

package 9, +

GL1

measure

package 9, +

GL7

measure

package 9 +

GL2 +

GL5

GL1

GL2

GL2 + GL5

construction time 1960-1980

size (m2) 100

number of floors 0

headroom (m) 2.7

basement no

number of rooms 3

Heating system type

gas convector heater

condensing boiler

condensing boiler

condensing boiler

wood gasification

boiler

pellet burning boiler 100%

condensing boiler

wood gasification

boiler

condensing boiler

condensing boiler

controller

with

thermostat

55/45 inside heated space, pump with

governor, electronic control opt. func., no

storage

70/55 water temp.,

thermostatic valves (2K),

with storage option (55/45)

55/45 inside

heated space,

pump with

governor,

electronic

control opt.

func., no

storage

70/55

water temp.,

thermostatic

valves (2K),

with storage

option (55/45)

55/45 inside heated space,

pump with governor, electronic

control opt. func., no storage

natural gas

natural gas

natural gas

firewood pellet natural gas

firewood natural gas

natural gas energy carrier used natural gas

DHWG system type

instantane

ous water

heater

condensing

combi boiler

condensing

combi boiler

condensing

combi boiler

Wood

gasificatio

n boiler

Pellet burning

boiler

condensing

boiler + solar

collector

Wood

gasification

boiler

condensing

combi boiler

condensing

boiler + solar

collector

without circulation, indirect heating, storage type

solid fuel

cylinder,

without

circulation,

indirect

heating,

storage type

without

circulation,

indirect

heating

storage

without

circulation,

indirect

heating,

storage type

solid fuel

cylinder,

without

circulation,

indirect

heating,

storage type

without

circulation,

indirect

heating

storage

with circulation,

indirect

heating,

storage type

energy carrier used natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas firewood pellet natural gas + solar energy firewood natural

gas

natural gas + solar energy

layout square boiler installation, control, heating system installation, heat transfer appliances installation, hot water system installation A/V 1.104

Ep (kWh/m2a) 408 347 344 341 246 234 217 191 174 154 149 136 128 103 122 99 222 284 255

Heating (kWh/m2a) 342 281 278 275 180 168 151 125 108 88 100 87 78 60 78 78 179 235 235

Domestic hot water (kWh/m

2a)

66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 66 50 50 50 43 43 20 43 50 20

Ventilation (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooling (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lighting (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Natural gas (kWh/a) 40282 34695 34400 34098 24603 23378 21709 19119 17438 15391 14206 12912 12068 0 0 9086 0 27679 24713

Biomass (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16093 18484 0 35890 0 0

District heating (kWh/a)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Page 29: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Electricity (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300 300 300 272 440 310 270 300 310

Investment costs (HUF)

0 506 943 577 368 1 172 809 1 471 877 1 575 845 2 119 969 1 978 821 2 153 213 3 292 779 3 663 001 3 837 393 4 976 959 4 983 379 6 909 379 6 046 959 1 947 400 1 819 000 3 010 980

Residual value 126 736 144 342 293 202 400 069 426 061 562 092 526 805 570 403 855 295 1 368 895 1 412 493 1 697 385 1 700 595 2 663 595 2 232 385 973 700 909 500 1 505 490

Initial maintenance 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000

Initial natural gas fee (HUF/a)

475 331 409 405 405 918 402 353 290 315 275 865 256 171 225 605 205 763 181 615 167 628 152 363 142 407 158 520 182 065 107 215 353 512 326 608 291 612

Initial electricity fee (HUF/a)

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 130 11 130 11 130 10 093 16 324 11 501 10 017 11 130 11 501

Investment (HUF/m2) 5 069 5 774 11 728 14 719 15 758 21 200 19 788 21 532 32 928 36 630 38 374 49 770 49 834 69 094 60 470 19 474 18 190 30 110

Savings costs (HUF/kWh)

83 90 175 91 91 111 91 92 130 142 141 178 164 242 196 105 147 197

Static payback time (a) 8 8 16 8 8 10 8 8 11 12 12 15 16 25 17 17 13 17

Static global costs (HUF)

14 469 942 12 999 093 12 964 899 13 453 409 10 391 323 10 061 796 10 015 090 8 956 956 8 536 091 8 951 221 9 235 737 8 952 183 9 793 069 10 251 790 13 071 059 9 818 445 13 063 274 12 161 144 12 314 368

E1 D3 I (HUF) 11 096 163 10 042 421 10 025 919 10 480 034 8 170 313 7 932 925 7 971 454 7 144 422 6 846 906 7 319 187 7 435 222 7 242 531 8 039 839 8 388 660 12 944 078 8 098 398 10 108 057 9 416 449 9 577 011

E2 D3 I (HUF) 12 633 038 11 366 137 11 338 360 11 780 951 9 108 979 8 824 871 8 799 723 7 873 862 7 512 192 7 906 397 8 039 007 7 796 961 8 562 078 8 957 242 13 951 482 8 508 913 11 306 676 10 534 261 10 583 730

E1 D5 I (HUF) 8 796 209 8 085 080 8 088 732 8 587 837 6 840 146 6 677 519 6 836 694 6 150 984 5 957 601 6 599 820 6 820 291 6 709 587 7 608 163 7 885 107 11 982 061 7 934 744 8 525 944 7 946 654 8 385 659

E2 D5 I (HUF) 9 874 063 9 013 440 9 009 185 9 500 208 7 498 460 7 303 067 7 417 583 6 662 561 6 424 185 7 011 647 7 243 421 7 098 102 7 974 102 8 283 577 12 688 109 8 222 316 9 366 280 8 730 285 9 091 366

E1 D3 M (HUF) 11 430 743 10 227 433 10 194 677 10 532 050 8 078 472 7 809 669 7 728 403 6 903 984 6 557 279 6 792 313 6 840 488 6 602 260 7 173 643 6 637 954 8 415 144 7 021 530 7 991 562 9 301 418 9 230 731

E2 D3 M (HUF) 12 640 880 11 269 729 11 228 095 11 556 394 8 817 580 8 511 988 8 380 583 7 478 346 7 081 126 7 254 683 7 315 910 7 038 819 7 584 855 7 085 656 8 950 030 7 344 770 8 935 357 10 181 584 10 023 423

E1 D5 M (HUF) 9 619 755 8 686 219 8 669 333 9 042 131 7 031 097 6 821 160 6 834 891 6 121 749 5 857 039 6 225 882 6 356 290 6 182 619 6 833 740 6 241 455 8 044 268 6 892 668 6 745 804 8 144 099 8 292 658

E2 D5 M (HUF) 10 468 459 9 417 212 9 394 100 9 760 533 7 549 454 7 313 717 7 292 284 6 524 566 6 224 428 6 550 156 6 689 463 6 488 536 7 121 881 6 555 212 8 419 027 7 119 103 7 407 486 8 761 131 8 848 333

E1 D3 I (HUF/m2) 110 962 100 424 100 259 104 800 81 703 79 329 79 715 71 444 68 469 73 192 74 352 72 425 80 398 83 887 129 441 80 984 101 081 94 164 95 770

E2 D3 I (HUF/m2) 126 330 113 661 113 384 117 810 91 090 88 249 87 997 78 739 75 122 79 064 80 390 77 970 85 621 89 572 139 515 85 089 113 067 105 343 105 837

E1 D5 I (HUF/m2) 87 962 80 851 80 887 85 878 68 401 66 775 68 367 61 510 59 576 65 998 68 203 67 096 76 082 78 851 119 821 79 347 85 259 79 467 83 857

E2 D5 I (HUF/m2) 98 741 90 134 90 092 95 002 74 985 73 031 74 176 66 626 64 242 70 116 72 434 70 981 79 741 82 836 126 881 82 223 93 663 87 303 90 914

E1 D3 M (HUF/m2) 114 307 102 274 101 947 105 320 80 785 78 097 77 284 69 040 65 573 67 923 68 405 66 023 71 736 66 380 84 151 70 215 79 916 93 014 92 307

E2 D3 M (HUF/m2) 126 409 112 697 112 281 115 564 88 176 85 120 83 806 74 783 70 811 72 547 73 159 70 388 75 849 70 857 89 500 73 448 89 354 101 816 100 234

E1 D5 M (HUF/m2) 96 198 86 862 86 693 90 421 70 311 68 212 68 349 61 217 58 570 62 259 63 563 61 826 68 337 62 415 80 443 68 927 67 458 81 441 82 927

E2 D5 M (HUF/m2) 104 685 94 172 93 941 97 605 75 495 73 137 72 923 65 246 62 244 65 502 66 895 64 885 71 219 65 552 84 190 71 191 74 075 87 611 88 483

energy2 energy1 energy2 energy1

Page 30: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 6 – Determining energy demand and global costs

CSH-4

original state

building construction complex building construction and technical building system

1. window

repl. only (1.4)

2. window

repl. only (1.15)

3. window

repl. only (0.8)

4. thermal

insulation

only (0.45)

5. thermal

insulation

only (0.35)

6. thermal

insulation

only (0.20.22)

7. complex

building

construction(1.

4 /

0.45)

8. complex

building

construction(1.15

/

0.35)

9. complex

building

construction(0.

8 /

0.20.22)

10. complex

building

construction,

technical building system (1.4 /

0.45)

11. complex

building

construction,

technical building system (1.15

/ 0.35)

12. complex

building

construction,

technical building system (0.8 /

0.20.22)

13. complex

building

construction,

technical building system (0.8 /

0.20.22)

construction material type brick (holed brick)

improvement of

building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.35 W/m2K

(facade), U=0.2

W/m2K

(attic slab), U=0,3

W/m2K

(basement slab)

improvement of

building envelope

efficiency to

U=0.2 W/m2K

(facade), U=0,14

W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0.20.22

W/m2K

(basement slab)

measure

package 7 +

GL3

measure

package 8 +

GL3

measure

package 9 +

GL3

measure

package 9 +

GL3 +

GL5

construction time 1980-1995

size (m2) 110

number of floors 0

headroom (m) 3

basement yes

number of rooms 4 boiler, perm condensing condensing condensing condensing temp boiler boiler boiler boiler

Heating system type

manifold inside

heated space,

90/70, constant

rev. pump, 1

central controller

repl. of all doors,

windows with

U=1.4

W/m2K

repl. of all doors,

windows with

U=1.15

W/m2K

repl. of all doors,

windows with

U=0.8 W/m2K

improvement of

building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.45 W/m2K

(facade), U=0,3

W/m2K

Measures 1 and

4 combined

Measures 2 and

5 combined

Measures 3 and

6 combined

55/45 inside heated space, pump with governor, electronic control

opt. func., no storage

energy carrier used natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas (attic slab),

U=0,5 W/m2K combi

combi boiler, (basement slab) combi combi combi condensing perm condensing condensing condensing boiler (40%) +

DHWG system type temp boiler boiler boiler solar collector

(60%)

indirect

heating,

storage

type

without circulation, indirect heating, storage type

indirect heating,

storage type

with circulation

natural gas +

energy carrier used natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas renewable

layout L boiler replacement, control, hot water system installation, heat transfer appliances

A/V 1.085 replacement

Ep (kWh/m2a) 607 587 585 582 364 209 186 220 182 161 151 126 107 80

Heating (kWh/m2a) 552 532 530 526 308 153 131 165 126 105 104 80 60 60

Domestic hot water (kWh/m2a) 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 46 46 46 19

Ventilation (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooling (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lighting (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Natural gas (kWh/a) 66027 63893 63636 63253 39274 22245 19723 23467 19267 16935 15811 13149 10994 7996

Biomass (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

District heating (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Electricity (kWh/a) 290 290 290 290 290 290 290 290 290 290 300 300 300 300

Investment costs (HUF) 0 518 465 590 490 1 199 464 2 116 633 2 391 879 3 382 258 2 635 098 2 982 369 4 581 722 4 000 418 4 347 689 5 947 042 7 017 042

Residual value 129 616 147 623 299 866 529 158 597 970 845 565 658 774 745 592 1 145 431 1 341 434 1 428 252 1 828 091 2 363 091

Initial maintenance 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 14 000

Initial natural gas fee (HUF/a) 779 124 753 937 750 910 746 383 463 437 262 486 232 736 276 908 227 347 199 828 186 572 155 156 129 725 94 357

Initial electricity fee (HUF/a) 10 759 10 759 10 759 10 759 10 759 10 759 10 759 10 759 10 759 10 759 11 130 11 130 11 130 11 130

Investment (HUF/m2) 4 713 5 368 10 904 19 242 21 744 30 748 23 955 27 112 41 652 36 367 39 524 54 064 63 791

Savings costs (HUF/kWh) 243 247 432 79 55 73 62 64 93 80 82 108 121

Static payback time (a) 21 21 37 7 5 6 5 5 8 7 7 9 10

Static global costs (HUF) 23 906 503 23 669 339 23 650 574 24 123 718 16 552 518 10 799 224 10 897 114 11 475 117 10 335 558 11 109 337 10 141 488 9 546 275 10 382 683 10 601 656

E1 D3 I (HUF) 18 316 742 18 206 376 18 201 870 18 646 100 12 991 227 8 636 638 8 846 396 9 185 782 8 363 179 9 171 944 8 217 522 7 810 478 8 667 054 8 922 519

E2 D3 I (HUF) 20 895 600 20 703 796 20 689 505 21 119 096 14 549 383 9 545 065 9 658 634 10 140 840 9 157 994 9 877 781 8 882 560 8 373 939 9 148 288 9 289 400

E1 D5 I (HUF) 14 489 849 14 525 514 14 539 007 15 033 518 10 790 448 7 421 014 7 820 863 7 911 704 7 345 089 8 361 526 7 505 808 7 266 955 8 321 103 8 847 405

E2 D5 I (HUF) 16 298 166 16 276 715 16 283 346 16 767 590 11 882 916 8 057 808 8 390 197 8 581 202 7 902 204 8 856 239 7 971 896 7 661 804 8 658 283 9 104 386

Page 31: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

E1 D3 M (HUF) 18 872 638 18 643 003 18 622 305 18 946 435 12 890 384 8 322 823 8 319 402 8 836 949 7 908 379 8 389 256 7 563 827 7 065 291 7 595 645 7 596 377

E2 D3 M (HUF) 20 903 235 20 609 475 20 581 073 20 893 676 14 117 279 9 038 120 8 958 960 9 588 963 8 534 217 8 945 033 8 087 479 7 508 961 7 974 569 7 885 260

E1 D5 M (HUF) 15 859 337 15 744 686 15 738 161 16 101 882 11 157 487 7 365 639 7 511 896 7 833 738 7 106 733 7 751 132 7 003 422 6 637 320 7 323 242 7 537 232

E2 D5 M (HUF) 17 283 208 17 123 584 17 111 656 17 467 293 12 017 698 7 867 051 7 960 190 8 360 902 7 545 406 8 140 669 7 370 420 6 948 225 7 588 738 7 739 580

E1 D3 I (HUF/m2) 166 516 165 513 165 472 169 510 118 102 78 515 80 422 83 507 76 029 83 381 74 705 71 004 78 791 81 114

E2 D3 I (HUF/m2) 189 960 188 216 188 086 191 992 132 267 86 773 87 806 92 189 83 254 89 798 80 751 76 127 83 166 84 449

E1 D5 I (HUF/m2) 131 726 132 050 132 173 136 668 98 095 67 464 71 099 71 925 66 774 76 014 68 235 66 063 75 646 80 431

E2 D5 I (HUF/m2) 148 165 147 970 148 030 152 433 108 027 73 253 76 275 78 011 71 838 80 511 72 472 69 653 78 712 82 767

E1 D3 M (HUF/m2) 171 569 169 482 169 294 172 240 117 185 75 662 75 631 80 336 71 894 76 266 68 762 64 230 69 051 69 058

E2 D3 M (HUF/m2) 190 029 187 359 187 101 189 943 128 339 82 165 81 445 87 172 77 584 81 318 73 523 68 263 72 496 71 684

E1 D5 M (HUF/m2) 144 176 143 134 143 074 146 381 101 432 66 960 68 290 71 216 64 607 70 465 63 667 60 339 66 575 68 520

E2 D5 M (HUF/m2) 157 120 155 669 155 561 158 794 109 252 71 519 72 365 76 008 68 595 74 006 67 004 63 166 68 989 70 360

Page 32: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 6 – Determining energy demand and global costs

CSH-5

original state

building construction complex building construction and technical building system

technical building system

1.

window

repl. only

(1.4)

2.

window

repl. only

(1.15)

3.

window

repl. only

(0.8)

4. thermal

insulation

only

(0.45)

5. thermal

insulation

only

(0.35)

6. thermal

insulation

only

(0.20.22)

7. complex

building

construction(1

.4

/ 0.45)

8. complex

building

constructi

on

(1.15 / 0.35)

9. complex

building

construction(0

.8

/ 0.20.22)

10. complex

building

construction,

technical

building system

(1.4 / 0.45)

11. complex

building

construction,

technical

building system

(1.15 / 0.35)

12. complex

building

construction,

technical

building system

(0.8 / 0.20.22)

13. complex

building

construction,

technical

building system

(1.4 / 0.45)

14. complex

building

construction,

technical

building system

(1,3 / 0.35)

15. complex

building

construction,

technical

building system

(0.8 / 0.20.22)

16. complex

building

construction,

technical

building system

(0.8 / 0.20.22)

17. complex

building

construction,

technical

building system

(0.8 / 0.20.22)

18.

technical

building

system only

(gas + solar

coll.)

19.

technical

building

system only

(gas)

20.

technical

building

system only

(gas + solar

coll.)

21. technical building

system only

(fa)

construction material type Porotherm 38

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.45

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,3

W/m2K (attic

slab

), U=0,5

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.35

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0.2

W/m2K (attic

slab

), U=0,3

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.2

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,14

W/m2K (attic

slab

), U=0.20.22

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

construction time after 1995

size (m2) 250 7.

measurement 8. measurement

9. measurement

7. measurement

8. measurement

9. measurement

9. measurement

9. measurement

number of floors 1 package + package + package + package + package + package + package + package + GL3 + GL5 GL3 GL5 GL1

headroom (m) 2.7 GL3 GL3 GL3 GL3 + GL5 GL3 + GL5 GL3 + GL5 GL4 + GL6 GL4

basement yes

number of rooms 5

ground coll ground coll

heat pump

(85%) +

original boiler

(15%)

boiler,

constant

temp.

heat pump

boiler, perm condensing condensing condensing condensing condensing condensing (85%) + condensing condensing Wood gasification

temperature boiler boiler boiler boiler boiler boiler original boiler boiler boiler boiler (15%) +

Heating system type solar cell

manifold.

inside

heated

space,

70/55,

constant rev.

pump,

central controller

repl. of all

doors,

windows

with

U=1.4

W/m2K

repl. of all

doors,

windows

with

U=1.15

W/m2K

repl. of all

doors,

windows

with

U=0.8

W/m2K

measur

ement 1

and 4

measur

ement 2

and 5

measur

ement 3

and 6

55/45 inside heated space, pump with

governor, electronic control opt. func., no

storage

55/45 inside heated space, pump with

governor, electronic control opt. func., no

storage

55/45 inside heated space, pump with governor, electronic control opt.

func., no storage

70/55

water temp.,

thermostatic

valves (2K), with

storage option

(55/45)

energy carrier used

natural gas natural

gas natural gas natural gas natural

gas natural gas

natural gas

electricity

electricity natural

gas natural gas

natural gas firewood

DHWG system type

combi boiler,

constant temp.

combi condensing boiler

combi condensing boiler (40%) + solar

collector (60%)

heat pump with ground

collector (65%) + original

boiler (35%)

combi cond.

boiler (40%)

+ solar

coll. (60%)

combi

condensing

boiler

boiler, perm

temp. (40%)

+ solar c.

(60%)

Wood

gasificati

on boiler

indirect

heating,

storage

type

without circulation, indirect heating, storage type

indirect heating, storage type with circulation

indirect heating, storage type with circulation

without

circulation,

indirect heating,

storage type

indirect

heating,

storage type

with circulation

without circulation,

indirect heating,

storage type

electricity

natural gas

natural gas natural gas natural gas +

solar energy

natural gas +

solar energy

natural gas +

solar energy

, natural gas,

electricity , natural gas

natural gas +

solar energy

natural gas

natural gas +

solar energy

firewood

energy carrier used natural gas solar energy

layout

rectangle

boiler replacement,

control

heat pump +

solar cell sys

(3000 kWh/a)

heat pumps sys

installation

boiler

replacement,

control, solar coll

sys

boiler

replacement,

control

solar coll sys

installation

boiler

replacement,

control

A/V

0.930

Ep (kWh/m2a) 155 143 141 139 140 128 116 127 114 101 107 95 83 91 80 66 79 86 108 125 131 110

Heating (kWh/m2a) 125 113 110 109 110 98 85 97 84 70 78 66 54 79 68 54 37 43 96 96 119 81

Domestic hot water (kWh/m2a) 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 12 12 12 43 43 13 30 13 29

Ventilation (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooling (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lighting (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Natural gas (kWh/a) 37620 34621 34044 33621 33839 30954 27797 30702 27403 24045 25794 22820 19792 21661 18880 15374 10491 4709 26045 30235 31739 0

Biomass (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44424

District heating (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Electricity (kWh/a) 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 400 400 400 437 440 440 3730 6730 400 440 410 320

Investment costs (HUF) 0 729 691 831 060 1 688 135 4 062 492 4 412 246 5 779 766 4 792 183 5 243 307 7 467 901 5 166 684 5 617 806 7 842 401 6 878 683 7 329 806 9 554 401 19 237 901 14 957 901 2 086 500 502 900 1 712 000 1 947 400

Residual value 182 423 207 765 422 034 1 015 623 1 103 062 1 444 942 1 198 046 1 310 827 1 866 975 1 385 296 1 498 076 2 054 225 2 241 296 2 354 076 2 910 225 7 751 975 5 611 975 1 043 250 251 450 856 000 973 700

Initial maintenance 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 14 000 14 000 14 000 7 000 7 000 14 000 7 000 14 000 7 000

Initial natural gas fee (HUF/a) 443 913 408 523 401 720 396 726 399 296 365 254 327 999 362 279 323 360 283 735 304 369 269 279 233 547 255 604 222 779 181 412 123 797 55 571 307 334 356 776 374 517 437 576

Initial electricity fee (HUF/a) 16 324 16 324 16 324 16 324 16 324 16 324 16 324 16 324 16 324 16 324 14 840 14 840 14 840 16 198 16 324 16 324 138 383 249 683 14 840 16 324 15 211 11 872

Investment (HUF/m2) 2 919 3 324 6 753 16 250 17 649 23 119 19 169 20 973 29 872 20 667 22 471 31 370 27 515 29 319 38 218 76 952 59 832 8 346 2 012 6 848 7 790

Page 33: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Savings costs (HUF/kWh) 243 232 422 1 074 662 588 693 513 550 433 377 437 431 391 429 1 018 870 179 68 287 173

Static payback time (a) 21 20 36 91 56 50 59 43 47 37 32 37 38 34 37 97 97 16 6 27 181

Static global costs (HUF) 14 017 097 13 685 115 13 582 390 14 289 634 16 741 102 16 069 587 16 319 466 16 360 260 15 643 827 16 679 663 14 952 949 14 351 375 15 504 010 15 452 756 14 922 895 15 906 482 27 313 287 24 325 523 12 171 724 11 905 904 13 823 829 15 640 844

E1 D3 I (HUF) 10 775 682 10 621 730 10 557 130 11 213 899 13 409 090 12 944 135 13 321 342 13 217 838 12 732 413 13 826 479 12 154 706 11 756 965 12 940 197 12 649 828 12 307 028 13 361 207 22 557 644 20 294 289 9 489 597 9 182 128 10 737 886 12 078 663

E2 D3 I (HUF) 12 301 610 12 033 236 11 946 639 12 587 260 14 790 761 14 215 738 14 472 491 14 479 821 13 868 561 14 834 508 13 221 211 12 710 016 13 777 716 13 566 205 13 117 971 14 038 400 23 726 282 21 860 329 10 565 690 10 426 320 12 033 258 13 559 384

E1 D5 I (HUF) 8 541 278 8 592 559 8 565 599 9 286 467 11 579 847 11 295 906 11 917 090 11 601 708 11 325 614 12 715 061 10 861 539 10 654 604 12 114 378 11 744 951 11 581 333 12 939 320 22 670 297 19 748 637 8 118 336 7 416 207 9 004 691 10 079 969

E2 D5 I (HUF) 9 610 982 9 582 015 9 539 629 10 249 171 12 548 380 12 187 245 12 723 951 12 486 300 12 121 955 13 421 548 11 609 080 11 322 576 12 701 325 12 387 164 12 149 598 13 413 782 23 485 883 20 839 704 8 872 601 8 288 322 9 912 732 11 118 097

E1 D3 M (HUF) 11 053 253 10 731 488 10 642 070 11 130 909 12 873 971 12 314 954 12 400 853 12 513 607 11 910 839 12 547 760 11 343 523 10 831 494 11 560 687 11 461 446 11 005 918 11 601 562 18 911 916 17 103 820 9 261 816 9 304 701 10 626 633 9 549 232

E2 D3 M (HUF) 12 254 771 11 842 910 11 736 171 12 212 295 13 961 901 13 316 216 13 307 269 13 507 294 12 805 444 13 341 484 12 183 291 11 581 928 12 220 151 12 183 003 11 644 456 12 134 785 19 832 103 18 336 922 10 109 133 10 284 380 11 646 611 10 715 154

E1 D5 M (HUF) 9 293 879 9 133 715 9 073 935 9 613 246 11 433 622 11 017 136 11 295 143 11 241 064 10 803 124 11 672 628 10 325 282 9 963 494 10 910 436 10 748 945 10 434 504 11 269 368 19 000 619 16 674 172 8 182 083 7 914 212 9 261 912 7 975 457

E2 D5 M (HUF) 10 136 166 9 912 814 9 840 888 10 371 281 12 196 247 11 718 978 11 930 466 11 937 593 11 430 164 12 228 917 10 913 896 10 489 455 11 372 598 11 254 624 10 881 957 11 642 960 19 642 813 17 533 280 8 775 992 8 600 917 9 976 905 8 792 881

E1 D3 I (HUF/m2) 43 103 42 487 42 229 44 856 53 636 51 777 53 285 52 871 50 930 55 306 48 619 47 028 51 761 50 599 49 228 53 445 90 231 81 177 37 958 36 729 42 952 48 315

E2 D3 I (HUF/m2) 49 206 48 133 47 787 50 349 59 163 56 863 57 890 57 919 55 474 59 338 52 885 50 840 55 111 54 265 52 472 56 154 94 905 87 441 42 263 41 705 48 133 54 238

E1 D5 I (HUF/m2) 34 165 34 370 34 262 37 146 46 319 45 184 47 668 46 407 45 302 50 860 43 446 42 618 48 458 46 980 46 325 51 757 90 681 78 995 32 473 29 665 36 019 40 320

E2 D5 I (HUF/m2) 38 444 38 328 38 159 40 997 50 194 48 749 50 896 49 945 48 488 53 686 46 436 45 290 50 805 49 549 48 598 53 655 93 944 83 359 35 490 33 153 39 651 44 472

E1 D3 M (HUF/m2) 44 213 42 926 42 568 44 524 51 496 49 260 49 603 50 054 47 643 50 191 45 374 43 326 46 243 45 846 44 024 46 406 75 648 68 415 37 047 37 219 42 507 38 197

E2 D3 M (HUF/m2) 49 019 47 372 46 945 48 849 55 848 53 265 53 229 54 029 51 222 53 366 48 733 46 328 48 881 48 732 46 578 48 539 79 328 73 348 40 437 41 138 46 586 42 861

E1 D5 M (HUF/m2) 37 176 36 535 36 296 38 453 45 734 44 069 45 181 44 964 43 212 46 691 41 301 39 854 43 642 42 996 41 738 45 077 76 002 66 697 32 728 31 657 37 048 31 902

E2 D5 M (HUF/m2) 40 545 39 651 39 364 41 485 48 785 46 876 47 722 47 750 45 721 48 916 43 656 41 958 45 490 45 018 43 528 46 572 78 571 70 133 35 104 34 404 39 908 35 172

Primary energy consumption (kWh/m2a)

Primary energy consumption (kWh/m2a)

Page 34: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 6 – Determining energy demand and global costs

CSH-6

1. 2006

requirements

(1.4 / 0.45)

building construction complex building construction and technica

l building system

complex building construction, technical building system and electricity

1.

window

repl.

only (1.15)

2.

window repl.

only (0.8)

5. walls (1.4

/ 0.35)

6. walls (1.4 / 0.20.22)

8.

complex

building

construc

tion (1.15 / 0.35)

9. complex

building

construction

(0.8 / 0.20.22)

10.

complex

building

construct

ion,

technical building system (1.4

/ 0.45)

11.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical

building

system

(1.15 /

0.35)

12.

complex

building

construct

ion,

technical building system (0.8

/ 0.20.22)

13.

complex

building

construc

tion,

technical building

system (0.8 / 0.20.22)

14.

complex

building

construc

tion,

technical building system

(0.8 / 0.20.22)

15.

complex

building

construc

tion,

technical building

system (1.15 / 0.35)

16.

complex

building

construc

tion,

technical building

system (0.8 / 0.20.22)

17.

complex

building

construc

tion,

technical building system (0.8 /

0.20.22)

18.

complex

building

construc

tion,

technical building system (1.15 /

0.20.22)

19. complex

building

construction,

technical

building system

(1.15 /

0.35) and 2 kWp PV:

20. complex

building

construction,

technical

building system

(1.15 /

0.20.22) and 2 kWp PV:

21. complex

building

construction,

technical

building

system (0.8 /

0.20.22) and 2 kWp PV:

2160 2160 2160

construction material type Porotherm new brick

tightening

requiremen

ts

U=0.20.22

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,14

W/m2K

(attic slab)

, U=0.20.22

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

existing state

with perm

temp. boiler

GL9

measure

package

8,

with perm

temp. boiler

GL9

measure

package 9,

perm with

perm temp.

boiler GL9

measure

package 8 +

GL2

measure

package 9,

+ GL4

2. and 6.

measure

package +

GL2

measure

package 8

+ GL2

construction time 2012

size (m2) 120 9.

measurement 9. measurement

8. measurement

8. measurement

2. and 6. measurement

number of floors 1 package + GL4 +

package + GL7 +

package + GL2 +

package + GL2 + package + GL2 +

headroom (m) 2.7 GL5 GL5 GL10 GL6 GL6

basement yes

number of rooms 4

condensing boiler

constant

temp.

boiler

constant

temp.

boiler

constant

temp.

boiler

heat pump

(85%) +

condensing

boiler (15%)

Pellet

burning

boiler

condensing

boiler

cond. boiler+heat

recovery

ventilation

heat pump (85%)

+ condensing

boiler (15%)

condensing boiler

condensing boiler

condensing boiler

condensing boiler

Heating system type

manifold inside

heated space,

55/45,

constant rev.

pump,

thermostatic

valves

repl. of all

doors,

windows

with U=1.15

W/m2K

repl. of all

doors,

windows

with U=0.8

W/m2K

tightening

requirements

U=0.35

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0.2

W/m2K

(attic slab), U=0,3 W/m

2K

measure

ments 2.

and 5.

meas

ureme

nts 3.

and 6.

manifold inside heated space, constant

rev. pump, thermostatic

valves

55/45 inside

heated space,

pump with

governor,

electronic

control opt.

func., no

storage

70/55

water temp.,

thermostatic

valves (2K),

with storage

option (55/45)

55/45 inside heated space, pump with governor, electronic control opt. func., no storage

energy carrier used

condensing boiler

natural gas

natural

gas

natural

gas

geotariffs

electricity,

natural gas,

solar energy

pellet

natural gas

natural gas

geotariffs

electricity,

natural gas

natural

gas

natural

gas

natural gas

natural gas

DHWG system type

condensing

combi boiler

(basement slab)

constant

temp.

boiler

constant

temp.

boiler

constant

temp.

boiler

heat pump (30%)

+ condensing

boiler (10%) +

solar collector (60%)

Pellet

burning

boiler

(40%) +

solar collector (60%)

combi

condensin

g boiler

combi

condensin

g boiler

heat pump (35%)

+ condensing

boiler (65%)

combi condensing

boiler

combi

condensin

g boiler

combi

condensin

g boiler

combi

condensin

g boiler

indirect heating,

storage type

without circulation, indirect heating, storage type

indirect heating, storage type, with circulation

without

circulation,

indirect

heating storage

without

circulation,

indirect heating,

storage type

indirect heating,

storage type

with

circulation

without

circulation,

indirect heating,

storage type

without

circulation,

indirect heating,

storage type

without

circulation,

indirect heating,

storage type

without

circulation,

indirect heating,

storage type

energy carrier used

natural gas

natural gas

natural

gas

natural

gas

geotariffs

electricity,

gas, solar

energy

pellet+ solar

energy

natural gas

natural gas

geotariffs

electricity,

gas

natural

gas

natural

gas

natural gas

natural gas

Page 35: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

layout rectangle

boiler type upgrade

control, heat

pump and solar

collector system

installation

control, pellet

boiler and solar

collector system

installation

control

control, heat

recovery

ventilation

installation

control,

heat

pump

installatio

n

control

control

control

control A/V

1.251

Ep (kWh/m2a) 159 156 153 139 128 136 123 188 160 146 61 91 132 114 88

Heating (kWh/m2a) 114 112 109 94 84 92 79 143 114 101 35 75 88 62 35 78 88 78 75

Domestic hot water (kWh/m2a) 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 26 16 44 45 53 44 44 45 44

Ventilation (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 0

Cooling (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lighting (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Natural gas (kWh/a) 18139 17878 17518 15737 14512 15476 13892 21717 18310 16650 1462 0 15013 11984 2363 13708 15013 13788 13429

Biomass (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16129 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

District heating (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Electricity (kWh/a) 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 340 340 340 2331 510 310 670 3302 360 -1850 -1850 -1850

Investment costs (HUF) 26 220 000 26 322 060 27 061 050 26 701 562 27 143 710 26 774 052

27 928 041 26 220 000 26 774 052 27 928 041 37 355 033 30 842 443 26 881 052 29 105 041 35 418 041 27 239 332

28 239 952

28 598 232 29 393 941

Residual value 25 515 210 263 120 390 230 928 138 513 427 010 0 138 513 427 010 5 140 506 1 884 211 192 013 1 015 510 4 172 010 281 583 871 463 961 033 1 159 960

Initial maintenance 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 7 000 14 000 14 000 7 000 29 000 14 000 7 000 42 000 42 000 42 000

Initial natural gas fee (HUF/a) 214 045 210 962 206 714 185 691 171 239 182 611 163 920 256 260 216 057 196 466 17 249 158 869 177 148 141 416 27 888 161 750 177 148 162 694 158 457

Initial electricity fee (HUF/a) 13 356 13 356 13 356 13 356 13 356 13 356 13 356 12 614 12 614 12 614 86 473 18 921 11 501 24 857 122 495 13 356 -68 635 -68 635 -68 635

Investment (HUF/m2) 218 500 219 351 225 509 222 513 226 198 223 117 232 734 218 500 223 117 232 734 311 292 257 020 224 009 242 542 295 150 226 994 235 333 238 319 244 950

Savings costs (HUF/kWh) 391 1 354 200 255 208 402 0 -4 597 1 109 948 572 203 536 1 092 230 233 244 311

Static payback time (a) 33 115 17 22 18 34 0 -436 93 95 108 17 74 131 19 24 24 31

Static global costs (HUF) 33 252 034 33 261 603 33 873 147 32 882 976 32 891 574 32 863 061

33 456 322 34 496 233 33 844 193 34 410 436 40 886 692 38 025 982 32 750 523 34 963 246 40 349 518 32 702 498

32 755 343

32 679 988 33 348 604

E1 D3 I (HUF) 31 658 638 31 679 859 32 247 470 31 442 553 31 509 398 31 437 232

32 047 467 32 607 324 32 185 090 32 774 700 38 222 743 36 635 841 31 352 315 33 414 263 37 798 420 31 367 366

31 529 625

31 520 946 32 139 860

E2 D3 I (HUF) 32 424 863 32 436 115 32 989 991 32 117 101 32 137 221 32 101 822

32 651 624 33 505 922 32 953 701 33 479 966 38 758 654 37 540 865 31 988 942 34 009 519 38 568 740 31 964 505

31 721 297

31 665 882 32 271 099

E1 D5 I (HUF) 30 552 201 30 593 094 31 215 692 30 495 747 30 653 119 30 508 708

31 263 148 31 300 553 31 098 662 31 836 834 38 639 231 35 689 606 30 470 021 32 787 583 37 792 114 30 566 446

31 198 468

31 276 421 31 952 908

E2 D5 I (HUF) 31 089 189 31 123 091 31 736 056 30 968 440 31 093 042 30 974 416

31 686 473 31 930 400 31 637 345 32 331 092 39 012 573 36 323 778 30 916 172 33 204 333 38 328 809 30 984 849

31 334 883

31 380 060 32 046 940

E1 D3 M (HUF) 26 184 295 26 183 533 26 606 397 25 853 473 25 824 212 25 831 829

26 206 411 27 168 113 26 607 822 26 961 061 30 474 630 28 908 437 25 727 996 27 192 377 30 317 543 25 658 598

25 607 911

25 519 166 25 982 493

E2 D3 M (HUF) 26 787 622 26 779 011 27 191 059 26 384 613 26 318 561 26 355 128

26 682 125 27 875 670 27 213 028 27 516 388 30 896 607 29 621 054 26 229 276 27 661 082 30 924 094 26 128 786

25 758 834

25 633 289 26 085 831

E1 D5 M (HUF) 25 313 084 25 327 813 25 793 974 25 107 956 25 149 977 25 100 707

25 588 836 26 139 159 25 752 367 26 222 584 30 802 573 28 163 370 25 033 276 26 698 928 30 312 577 25 027 952

25 347 157

25 326 627 25 835 287

E2 D5 M (HUF) 25 735 910 25 745 133 26 203 709 25 480 155 25 496 373 25 467 407

25 922 163 26 635 101 26 176 527 26 611 763 31 096 543 28 662 718 25 384 576 27 027 077 30 735 172 25 357 404

25 454 571

25 408 232 25 909 328

E1 D3 I (HUF/m2) 270 207 270 301 274 917 267 643 267 810 267 515 272 097 279 216 274 614 279 000 322 989 312 841 266 575 283 413 321 406 266 371 264 344 263 882 268 926

E2 D3 I (HUF/m2) 254 602 254 942 260 131 254 131 255 443 254 239 260 526 260 838 259 156 265 307 321 994 297 413 253 917 273 230 314 934 254 720 259 987 260 637 266 274

E1 D5 I (HUF/m2) 259 077 259 359 264 467 258 070 259 109 258 120 264 054 266 087 263 645 269 426 325 105 302 698 257 635 276 703 319 407 258 207 261 124 261 501 267 058

E2 D5 I (HUF/m2) 218 202 218 196 221 720 215 446 215 202 215 265 218 387 226 401 221 732 224 676 253 955 240 904 214 400 226 603 252 646 213 822 213 399 212 660 216 521

E1 D3 M (HUF/m2) 223 230 223 158 226 592 219 872 219 321 219 626 222 351 232 297 226 775 229 303 257 472 246 842 218 577 230 509 257 701 217 740 214 657 213 611 217 382

E2 D3 M (HUF/m2) 210 942 211 065 214 950 209 233 209 583 209 173 213 240 217 826 214 603 218 522 256 688 234 695 208 611 222 491 252 605 208 566 211 226 211 055 215 294

E1 D5 M (HUF/m2) 214 466 214 543 218 364 212 335 212 470 212 228 216 018 221 959 218 138 221 765 259 138 238 856 211 538 225 226 256 126 211 312 212 121 211 735 215 911

Page 36: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table
Page 37: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 6 – Determining energy demand and global costs

TH-1

original state

building construction complex building construction and technical building system

1.

window repl.

only (1.4)

2.

window

repl.

only (1.15)

3.

window repl.

only (0.8)

4. thermal

insulation

only (0.45)

5. thermal

insulation

only (0.35)

6. thermal

insulation

only

(0.20.22)

7. complex

building

construction(

1.4 / 0.45)

8. complex

building

construction(1

.15 / 0.35)

9. complex

building

construction(

0.8 / 0.20.22)

10.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building

system (1.4 /

0.45)

11.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building

system (1.15

/ 0.35)

12.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building

system (0.8 /

0.20.22)

13.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building

system (1.4 /

0.45)

14.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building

system (1.15

/ 0.35)

15.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building

system (0.8 /

0.20.22)

16.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building

system (1.4 /

0.45)

17.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building

system (1.15

/ 0.35)

18.

complex

building

constructi

on,

technical building

system (0.8 /

0.20.22)

construction material type concrete panel

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.45

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,3 W/m2K

(flat roof),

U=0,5

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.35

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0.2 W/m2K

(flat roof),

U=0,3

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.2 W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,14 W/m2K

(flat roof),

U=0.20.22

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

measure

package 7 +

GL8 +

GL5

measure

package 8 +

GL8 +

GL5

measure

package 9 +

GL8 +

GL5

measure

package 7 +

GL8 +

GL10

measure

package 8 +

GL8 +

GL10

measure

package 9 +

GL8 +

GL10

construction time 1960-1990

number of floors 20075

number of flats 10 7. measurement

8. measurement

9. measurement

size of flats (m2) 365 package +

GL8 package, +

GL8 package, +

GL8 headroom (m) 55

number of rooms 2.65

basement 2

all

doors,

window

s

all

doors,

window

s

all

doors,

window

s

measures 1. and 4.

measures 2. and 5.

measures 3. and 6.

Heating system type

yes

district heating

district heating

district heating

district heating

district heating

district heating

heat recovery ventilation

district heating

district heating district heating district heating district heating district heating district heating

district heating

district heating district heating

Heating system type

replacement

to U=1.4

W/m2K

replacement

to U=1.15

W/m2K

replacement

to U=0.8

W/m2K

manifold

inside heated

space, 90/70,

perm rev. pump,

central

thermovalves installation, 2-coil system

thermovalves installation, 2-coil

system, heat recovery ventilation

installation

control

DHWG system type district heating

district heating district heating (70%) + solar collector (30%)

district heating district

heating

indirect heating district

heating District heating + solar energy

district heating energy carrier used storage

district heating

solar collector system installation

A/V 0.281

Ep (kWh/m2a) 217 172 169 164 167 162 155 121 112 101 113 104 93 100 90 78 91 89 77

Heating (kWh/m2a) 165 119 116 111 114 109 102 68 59 48 60 51 40 62 53 40 38 36 24

Domestic hot water (kWh/m2a) 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 38 38 38 53 53 53

Ventilation (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooling (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lighting (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Natural gas (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Biomass (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

District heating (kWh/a) 3443860 2721765 2670428 2597852 2646548 2561564 2448073 1902387 1762636 1591543 1774543 1634892 1463816 1570928 1422378 1218667 1422015 1394366 1202108

Page 38: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Electricity (kWh/a) 18540 18540 18540 18540 18540 18540 18540 18540 18540 18540 18540 18540 18540 20686 18540 18540 27250 26510 24710

Investment costs (HUF) 0 114 838 263 130 791 610 265 677 411 267 887 220 299 226 381 378 933 490 382 725 484 430 017 991 644 610 901 433 496 984 480 789 491 695 382 401 603 878 665 663 811 448 839 885 901 693 705 165 831 747 948 929 712 401

Residual value 28 709 566 32 697 903 66 419 353 66 971 805 74 806 595 94 733 373 95 681 371 107 504 498 161 152 725 121 067 121 132 890 248 186 538 475 199 788 416 214 771 612 258 790 225 244 701 666 298 739 862 303 703 475

Initial maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 632 500 632 500 632 500 8 030 000 8 030 000 8 030 000

Initial district heating fee (HUF/a)

48 558 428 38 376 887 37 653 028 36 629 720 37 316 328 36 118 051 34 517 832 26 823 660 24 853 168 22 440 755 25 021 055 23 051 979 20 639 802 22 150 085 20 055 524 17 183 198 20 050 418 19 660 561 16 949 719

Initial electricity fee (HUF/a) 687 834 687 834 687 834 687 834 687 834 687 834 687 834 687 834 687 834 687 834 687 834 687 834 687 834 767 447 687 834 687 834 1 010 975 983 521 916 741

Investment (HUF/m2) 5 720 6 515 13 234 13 344 14 905 18 876 19 065 21 421 32 110 21 594 23 950 34 639 30 081 33 067 41 837 34 556 41 432 46 312

Savings costs (HUF/kWh) 126 134 249 267 269 302 197 203 276 206 211 279 256 261 300 273 323 330

Static payback time (a) 11 12 22 24 24 27 18 18 25 18 19 25 24 24 27 34 40 40

Static global costs (HUF) 1 477 387 859

1 286 779 901 1 281 017 470

1 385 204 035 1 408 012 068 1 403 402 926 1 435 103 483 1 208 070 289

1 196 248 046 1 338 468 581

1 204 763 654 1 192 983 870 1 335 211 480 1 310 379 630 1 305 087 191

1 394 991 865 1 566 446 951

1 691 970 419 1 706 606 197

E1 D3 I (HUF) 1 128 913 607

999 058 831 996 834 813 1 094 762 011 1 112 475 145 1 113 229 253 1 148 296 964 975 494 849 972 917 485 1 110 747 376

974 802 765 972 257 815 1 110 093 107 1 068 786 290 1 072 794 183

1 165 434 102 1 320 393 784

1 427 167 091 1 459 424 074

E2 D3 I (HUF) 1 289 735 275

1 126 960 836 1 122 396 387

1 217 014 954 1 236 948 076 1 233 827 832 1 263 721 606 1 066 042 158

1 057 093 664 1 187 123 575

1 059 521 768 1 050 610 263 1 180 646 340 1 144 664 725 1 141 458 287

1 224 811 203 1 390 835 617

1 496 195 975 1 519 317 279

E1 D5 I (HUF) 890 313 439 815 073 967 817 095 739 926 258 958 940 752 811 948 765 097 995 289 400 859 893 250 869 053 830 1 028 554 832

872 654 409 881 840 555 1 041 345 817 994 778 923 1 012 135 761

1 126 877 490 1 263 626 291

1 382 502 412 1 429 154 987

E2 D5 I (HUF) 1 003 082 394

904 755 406 905 135 765 1 011 978 547 1 028 029 340 1 033 324 432 1 076 220 102 923 376 756 928 069 078 1 082 099 727

932 050 355 936 771 451 1 090 806 897 1 047 972 413 1 060 271 941

1 168 500 424 1 312 999 871

1 430 885 846 1 471 133 241

E1 D3 M (HUF) 2 033 127 140

1 691 431 363 1 672 656 556

1 725 698 588 1 755 793 467 1 728 206 362 1 718 185 041 1 401 169 998

1 352 798 855 1 404 591 578

1 358 231 672 1 309 919 336 1 361 721 860 1 364 973 422 1 318 611 670

1 324 005 564 1 514 499 110

1 589 315 024 1 550 744 627

E2 D3 M (HUF) 2 185 660 546

1 812 612 708 1 791 608 919

1 841 499 875 1 873 709 027 1 842 432 064 1 827 483 184 1 486 775 442

1 432 336 556 1 476 700 727

1 438 286 348 1 383 910 627 1 428 285 326 1 436 535 580 1 383 375 967

1 379 925 096 1 580 660 469

1 654 155 867 1 606 945 996

E1 D5 M (HUF) 1 806 490 020

1 515 926 087 1 501 072 261

1 563 778 435 1 590 790 344 1 569 874 896 1 570 151 927 1 288 732 464

1 251 176 790 1 321 959 149

1 257 826 216 1 220 322 828 1 291 113 900 1 289 018 048 1 254 839 313

1 279 929 112 1 453 794 552

1 538 451 453 1 513 380 166

E2 D5 M (HUF) 1 913 450 417

1 600 898 374 1 584 481 297

1 644 977 530 1 673 472 240 1 649 968 987 1 646 790 178 1 348 754 338

1 306 943 180 1 372 515 679

1 313 955 176 1 272 199 360 1 337 781 083 1 339 189 140 1 300 244 686

1 319 131 394 1 500 172 346

1 583 903 757 1 552 774 881

E1 D3 I (HUF/m2) 56 235 49 766 49 656 54 534 55 416 55 454 57 200 48 593 48 464 55 330 48 558 48 431 55 297 53 240 53 439 58 054 65 773 71 092 72 699

E2 D3 I (HUF/m2) 64 246 56 138 55 910 60 623 61 616 61 461 62 950 53 103 52 657 59 134 52 778 52 334 58 812 57 019 56 860 61 012 69 282 74 530 75 682

E1 D5 I (HUF/m2) 44 349 40 601 40 702 46 140 46 862 47 261 49 579 42 834 43 290 51 236 43 470 43 927 51 873 49 553 50 418 56 133 62 945 68 867 71 191

E2 D5 I (HUF/m2) 49 967 45 069 45 088 50 410 51 209 51 473 53 610 45 996 46 230 53 903 46 428 46 664 54 337 52 203 52 816 58 207 65 405 71 277 73 282

E1 D3 M (HUF/m2) 101 277 84 256 83 320 85 963 87 462 86 087 85 588 69 797 67 387 69 967 67 658 65 251 67 832 67 994 65 684 65 953 75 442 79 169 77 248

E2 D3 M (HUF/m2) 108 875 90 292 89 246 91 731 93 335 91 777 91 033 74 061 71 349 73 559 71 646 68 937 71 147 71 558 68 910 68 738 78 738 82 399 80 047

E1 D5 M (HUF/m2) 89 987 75 513 74 773 77 897 79 242 78 200 78 214 64 196 62 325 65 851 62 656 60 788 64 315 64 210 62 508 63 757 72 418 76 635 75 386

E2 D5 M (HUF/m2) 95 315 79 746 78 928 81 942 83 361 82 190 82 032 67 186 65 103 68 369 65 452 63 372 66 639 66 709 64 769 65 710 74 728 78 899 77 349

Page 39: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 6 – Determining energy demand and global costs

TH-2

original state

building construction complex building construction and technical building system

1.

window

repl. only (1.4)

2.

window

repl. only (1.15)

3.

window

repl. only (0.8)

4.

thermal

insulation

only (0.45)

5.

thermal

insulation

only (0.35)

6.

thermal

insulation

only (0.20.22)

7. complex

building

construction(

1.4 / 0.45)

8.

complex

building

construc

tion (1.15 / 0.35)

9. complex

building

construction(

0.8 / 0.20.22)

10.

complex

building

constructio

n,

technical

building

system

(1.4 / 0.45)

11.

complex

building

constructio

n,

technical

building

system

(1.15 /

0.35)

12.

complex

building

constructio

n,

technical

building

system

(0.8 /

0.20.22)

13.

complex

building

constructio

n,

technical

building

system

(1,0 /

0.20.22)

14.

complex

building

construction,

technical

building

system (0.8 /

0.20.22) +

heat

recovery

appliance

15.

technic

al

building

system

only

16.

complex

building

constructio

n,

technical building system

(1.15 /

0.35)

17. technical building system only

18.

complex

building

constructio

n,

technical building system

(1.15 /

0.35)

19.

complex

building

constructio

n,

technical building

system (0.8

0.20.22)

/

construction material type small-sized brick (50)

improveme

nt of

building

envelope

efficiency

to U=0.45

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,3

W/m2K

(attic slab)

, U=0,5

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

improveme

nt of

building

envelope

efficiency

to U=0.35

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0.2

W/m2K

(attic slab)

, U=0,3

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.2

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,14

W/m2K (attic

slab)

, U=0.20.22

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

measure

package 8,

+

GL2

measure

package 9,

+

GL2

12.a.

measure

package +

GL2

measure

package 9,

+ GL2 +

GL10

GL2

measure

package 8, +

GL2 +

GL6

convector replacement

measure

package 8,

+

convector replacement

measure

package 9,

+

convector replacement

construction time before 1960

number of floors 2240

number of flats 3 7. measurement

size of flats (m2) 32 package +

GL2 headroom (m) 70

number of rooms 3.4

basement 3 repl. of all

doors,

windows

with U=1.4

W/m2

K

repl. of all repl. of all

doors,

windows

with U=0.8

W/m2K

measure

s 1. and

4.

measu

res 2.

and 5.

measu

res 3.

and 6.

doors condensing

no windows condensing condensing condensing condensing boiler + condensing condensing gas convector heater

gas convector heater

gas convector heater

Heating system type to U=1.15

boiler boiler boiler boiler heat recovery appliance

boiler boiler

gas convector heater W/m2K natural

gas natural gas natural gas natural

gas natural gas

natural gas

natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas

controller 55/45 inside heated space, pump with governor, electronic control opt. func., no storage

controller controller controller Heating system type with thermostat with thermostat with thermostat with

thermostat

natural gas condensing condensing condensing condensing condensing condensing condensing

natural gas

natural gas

natural gas DHWG system type

boiler boiler boiler boiler boiler boiler boiler

heater, storage type

natural gas

natural gas natural gas natural gas

natural gas

natural gas

natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas

without circulation, indirect heating, storage type heater, storage type

heater, storage type

heater, storage type

energy carrier used electricity boiler installation, control, system installation, heat transfer appliances installation, hot water system

+ solar cell

A/V 0.510 installation system installation

electricity electricity electricity

Ep (kWh/m2a) 405 336 333 330 290 283 270 222 211 195 128 121 111 111 94 213 99 328 171 15

8 Heating (kWh/m

2a) 307 239 235 232 192 185 172 124 114 97 73 66 56 56 38 158 66 249 92 79

Domestic hot water (kWh/m2a) 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 98 55 55 55 55 55 55 33 79 79 79

Ventilation (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Cooling (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lighting (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Natural gas (kWh/a) 687008 534261 527117 520781 431000 415000 385668 278254 255107 217652 162448 148146 125174 125704 85987 354469 148146 556892 206791 176430 Biomass (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 District heating (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Electricity (kWh/a) 87808 87360 87360 87360 87360 87360 87360 87360 87360 87360 49434 49434 49434 49434 49434 49434 29660 71178 70815 70815 Investment costs (HUF) 0 6 885 981 7 842 582 15 930 662 18 852 859 19 622 852 24 894 298 25 738 840 27 465 434 40 824 959 79 632 600 81 359 194 94 718 719 94 718 719 122 110 719 58 130 960 120 017 941 41 088 000 67 134 168 77 804 159 Residual value 1 721 495 1 960 646 3 982 665 5 740 415 5 932 913 7 250 774 7 461 910 7 893 559 11 233 440 34 408 790 34 840 439 38 180 320 38 180 320 51 876 320 29 065 480 53 497 428 20 544 000 27 055 542 29 723 040 Initial maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 632 500 0 0 0 Initial natural gas fee (HUF/a) 8 106 689 6 304 281 6 219 983 6 145 212 5 085 806 4 897 001 4 550 883 3 283 398 3 010 264 2 568 289 1 916 882 1 748 119 1 477 048 1 483 313 1 014 647 4 182 733 1 748 119 6 571 331 2 440 139 2 081 871 Initial electricity fee (HUF/a) 3 257 677 3 241 056 3 241 056 3 241 056 3 241 056 3 241 056 3 241 056 3 241 056 3 241 056 3 241 056 1 834 006 1 834 006 1 834 006 1 834 006 1 834 006 1 834 006 1 100 403 2 640 693 2 627 220 2 627 220

Investment (HUF/m2) 3 074 3 501 7 112 8 416 8 760 11 114 11 491 12 261 18 225 35 550 36 321 42 285 42 285 54 514 25 951 53 579 18 343 29 971 34 734

Savings costs (HUF/kWh) 45 49 95 73 72 82 63 63 87 128 128 144 144 175 136 175 239 128 141

Static payback time (a) 4 4 8 6 6 7 5 5 7 10 10 12 12 14 11 15 19 11 12 Static global costs (HUF) 340 930 959 293 246 094 291 673

747 297 518 697 268 658 714 263 764 552 258 652 479 221 472 473 215 005 046 215 105 307 192 159

229 188 822 931 194 050 332 194 238 263 207 570 290 238 633 130 224 448 611 317 448 702 219 154 914 219 076 866

E1 D3 I (HUF) 265 303 568 229 813 676 228 743 755

234 308 566 212 263 100 208 631 835 205 447 941 177 179 545 172 477 658 174 375 631 154 572 227

152 260 672 158 072 747 158 216 215 169 382 516 187 106 412 184 478 089 247 906 391 176 398 363 177 793 522

E2 D3 I (HUF) 309 602 905 268 193 058 266 850 578

272 173 634 246 702 823 242 461 100 238 158 115 205 791 600 200 206 597 200 675 543 170 953 328

168 096 116 173 031 746 173 195 469 182 846 447 210 813 619 196 240 211 283 815 702 198 875 608 199 112 390

E1 D5 I (HUF) 208 821 209 182 461 385 181 843 922

188 147 363 171 555 564 168 873 734 167 610 182 145 514 031 142 214 186 146 873 164 141 994 472

140 579 945 148 326 080 148 439 237 164 425 741 162 569 206 180 160 582 205 950 198 155 716 414 159 342 238

E2 D5 I (HUF) 239 795 134 209 283 955 208 475 214 609 231 195 615 138 192 505 176 190 456 773 165 486 492 161 567 292 165 224 052 153 429 151 632 608 158 764 066 158 891 429 173 815 193 179 142 566 188 377 784 231 057 850 171 404 159 174 217 579

Page 40: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

340 819 E1 D3 M (HUF) 265 396 646 227 184 109 225 863

951 229 821 980 206 459 907 202 530 723 198 062 342 168 621 184 163 371 116 162 360 997 138 516

509 135 740 041 138 780 374 138 928 840 145 065 370 176 974 096 158 730 680 240 998 044 161 238 221 160 306 540

E2 D3 M (HUF) 300 278 014 257 404 095 255 869 323

259 636 994 233 577 799 229 167 939 223 818 385 191 150 361 185 204 926 183 069 590 151 415 013

148 208 894 150 559 113 150 723 528 155 666 890 195 641 188 167 992 194 269 273 092 178 936 840 177 093 051

E1 D5 M (HUF) 220 922 347 189 898 840 188 934 949

193 474 576 174 406 729 171 225 131 168 268 832 143 687 709 139 541 610 140 705 511 128 612 764

126 542 618 131 105 833 131 230 433 141 162 397 157 653 461 155 331 068 207 961 672 144 953 222 145 777 970

E2 D5 M (HUF) 245 311 265 211 018 975 209 904 568

214 310 692 193 351 275 189 832 566 186 258 274 159 414 056 154 780 276 155 155 030 137 616 975

135 245 502 139 324 720 139 460 505 148 555 666 170 703 351 161 801 306 227 731 476 157 305 777 157 490 837

E1 D3 I (HUF/m2) 118 439 102 595 102 118 104 602 94 760 93 139 91 718 79 098 76 999 77 846 69 005 67 974 70 568 70 632 75 617 83 530 82 356 110 672 78 749 79 372

E2 D3 I (HUF/m2) 138 216 119 729 119 130 121 506 110 135 108 242 106 321 91 871 89 378 89 587 76 318 75 043 77 246 77 319 81 628 94 113 87 607 126 703 88 784 88 889

E1 D5 I (HUF/m2) 93 224 81 456 81 180 83 994 76 587 75 390 74 826 64 962 63 488 65 568 63 390 62 759 66 217 66 268 73 404 72 576 80 429 91 942 69 516 71 135

E2 D5 I (HUF/m2) 107 051 93 430 93 069 95 808 87 328 85 940 85 025 73 878 72 128 73 761 68 495 67 693 70 877 70 934 77 596 79 974 84 097 103 151 76 520 77 776

E1 D3 M (HUF/m2) 118 481 101 421 100 832 102 599 92 170 90 416 88 421 75 277 72 934 72 483 61 838 60 598 61 956 62 022 64 761 79 006 70 862 107 588 71 981 71 565

E2 D3 M (HUF/m2) 134 053 114 913 114 227 115 909 104 276 102 307 99 919 85 335 82 681 81 727 67 596 66 165 67 214 67 287 69 494 87 340 74 997 120 211 79 883 79 059

E1 D5 M (HUF/m2) 98 626 84 776 84 346 86 373 77 860 76 440 75 120 64 146 62 295 62 815 57 416 56 492 58 529 58 585 63 019 70 381 69 344 92 840 64 711 65 079

E2 D5 M (HUF/m2) 109 514 94 205 93 707 95 674 86 318 84 747 83 151 71 167 69 098 69 266 61 436 60 377 62 199 62 259 66 319 76 207 72 233 101 666 70 226 70 308

Page 41: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 6 – Determining energy demand and global costs

TH-3

1. present

requirements (1.4 / 0.45)

building construction complex building construction and technical building system

complex building construction, technical building system and electricity

1. window

repl. only (1.15)

2. window

repl. only (0.8)

5. walls (1.4 /

0.35)

6. walls (1.4 /

0.20.22)

8. complex

building

construction(1.15

/ 0.35)

9. complex

building

construction(0.

8 / 0.20.22)

10. complex

building

construction,

technical building system (1.4 /

0.45)

11. complex

building

construction(1.15

/ 0.35) technical

building system

12. complex

building

construction(0.8 /

0.20.22)

technical building

system

13. 8-as

(1.15/0.35) PV: 6

kWp south 30

degree 10%

shade efficiency

14. 1 6 (1.15/0.20.22) PV: 6 kWp south 30 degree 10% shade efficiency

15. 9 (0.8/0.20.22)

PV: 6 kWp south

30 degree 10%

shade efficiency

6480 6480 6480

construction material type heat insulated

tightening

requirements to

U=0.35 W/m2K

(facade),

U=0.2 W/m2K

(attic slab), U=0,3

W/m2K

(basement slab)

tightening

requirements to

U=0.2 W/m2K

(facade), U=0,14

W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0.20.22

W/m2K

(basement slab)

1. + GL10

8. + GL10

9. + GL10

8. + GL6

1. + 6. + GL6

9. + GL6

construction time 2011

size (m2) 420

number of floors 2

number of flats 6

size of flats (m2) 70

headroom (m) 2.75 heat recovery ventilation installation solar cell system (6 kW)

number of rooms 3

basement no condensing boiler

Heating system type

condensing

combi boiler

manifold inside

heated space,

55/45,

repl. of all doors,

windows with

U=1.15 W/m2K

repl. of all doors,

windows with

U=0.8 W/m2K

Measures 2 and

5 combined

Measures 3 and

6 combined

55/45 inside heated space, pump with governor, electronic control opt. func., no storage

constant rev. pump,

thermostatic

valves

energy carrier used natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas condensing

combi

condensing

boiler

combi

condensing

boiler

combi

condensing

boiler

combi

condensing

boiler

combi

condensing

boiler

combi

condensing

boiler

DHWG system type combi boiler,

indirect heating

storage

energy carrier used natural gas without circulation indirect heating, storage type

A/V 0.771 natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas

Ep (kWh/m2a) 138 131 122 124 118 119 104 117 111 101 80 74 65

Heating (kWh/m2a) 91 85 75 78 72 72 57 63 57 47 72 66 57

Domestic hot water (kWh/m2a) 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47

Ventilation (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 0 0 0

Cooling (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lighting (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Natural gas (kWh/a) 52049 49369 45374 46415 44008 44081 37723 40289 37609 33614 44081 41328 37723

Biomass (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

District heating (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Electricity (kWh/a) 2300 2300 2300 2300 2300 2300 2300 3560 3560 3560 -4180 -4180 -4180

Investment costs (HUF) 95 331 862 96 367 042 103 862 512 100 271 094 100 844 028 101 306 274 109 374 678 99 183 862 105 158 274 113 226 678 105 586 274 105 586 274 113 654 678

Residual value 258 795 2 132 663 1 234 808 1 378 041 1 493 603 3 510 704 1 926 000 3 419 603 5 436 704 3 633 603 3 633 603 5 650 704

Initial maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 132 000 132 000 132 000 120 000 120 000 120 000

Initial natural gas fee (HUF/a) 614 175 582 551 535 414 547 700 519 298 520 155 445 136 475 407 443 783 396 646 520 155 487 673 445 136

Initial electricity fee (HUF/a) 85 330 85 330 85 330 85 330 85 330 85 330 85 330 132 076 132 076 132 076 -155 078 -155 078 -155 078

Investment (HUF/m2) 226 981 229 445 247 292 238 741 240 105 241 205 260 416 236 152 250 377 269 587 251 396 251 396 270 606

Savings costs (HUF/kWh) 386 1 278 877 686 750 980 447 870 1 171 424 381 600

Static payback time (a) 33 108 74 58 64 83 -96 -1 176 461 48 42 63

Static global costs (HUF) 116 317 017 116 403 470 122 484 845 119 262 005 118 982 853 119 470 822 125 288 656 121 368 357 126 394 043 133 048 351 120 138 582 119 164 133 125 956 416

E1 D3 I (HUF) 111 483 968 111 691 103 117 355 606 114 405 610 114 270 616 114 706 158 120 247 586 116 488 350 121 139 551 127 319 550 115 850 627 115 106 724 121 392 054

E2 D3 I (HUF) 113 943 556 114 048 441 119 560 539 116 650 267 116 423 439 116 861 753 122 160 624 118 758 821 123 307 772 129 335 366 116 671 358 115 822 434 121 970 229

E1 D5 I (HUF) 108 060 176 108 468 560 114 710 369 111 533 594 111 562 726 112 015 656 118 295 997 113 847 321 118 929 900 125 713 899 114 832 479 114 245 743 121 112 819

E2 D5 I (HUF) 109 782 681 110 119 355 116 254 278 113 105 362 113 070 088 113 524 962 119 635 191 115 435 837 120 446 706 127 123 819 115 412 579 114 752 188 121 522 808

E1 D3 M (HUF) 91 539 589 91 523 479 95 716 605 93 463 395 93 196 148 93 543 953 97 482 165 94 845 169 98 328 323 102 927 351 93 666 013 92 896 196 97 604 224

E2 D3 M (HUF) 93 476 273 93 379 651 97 452 773 95 230 842 94 891 284 95 241 272 98 988 494 96 632 941 100 035 584 104 514 608 94 312 258 93 459 746 98 059 480

E1 D5 M (HUF) 88 843 690 88 986 044 93 633 741 91 201 965 91 063 951 91 425 447 95 945 480 92 765 618 96 588 441 101 663 059 92 864 321 92 218 257 97 384 354

E2 D5 M (HUF) 90 199 993 90 285 883 94 849 417 92 439 578 92 250 850 92 613 878 96 999 964 94 016 418 97 782 776 102 773 232 93 321 093 92 617 034 97 707 180

Page 42: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

E1 D3 I (HUF/m2) 265 438 265 931 279 418 272 394 272 073 273 110 286 304 277 353 288 428 303 142 275 835 274 064 289 029

E2 D3 I (HUF/m2) 271 294 271 544 284 668 277 739 277 199 278 242 290 859 282 759 293 590 307 941 277 789 275 768 290 405

E1 D5 I (HUF/m2) 257 286 258 258 273 120 265 556 265 626 266 704 281 657 271 065 283 166 299 319 273 411 272 014 288 364

E2 D5 I (HUF/m2) 261 387 262 189 276 796 269 298 269 214 270 298 284 846 274 847 286 778 302 676 274 792 273 219 289 340

E1 D3 M (HUF/m2) 217 951 217 913 227 897 222 532 221 896 222 724 232 100 225 822 234 115 245 065 223 014 221 181 232 391

E2 D3 M (HUF/m2) 222 563 222 333 232 030 226 740 225 932 226 765 235 687 230 078 238 180 248 844 224 553 222 523 233 475

E1 D5 M (HUF/m2) 211 533 211 872 222 937 217 148 216 819 217 680 228 442 220 871 229 972 242 055 221 106 219 567 231 868

E2 D5 M (HUF/m2) 214 762 214 966 225 832 220 094 219 645 220 509 230 952 223 849 232 816 244 698 222 193 220 517 232 636

Page 43: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 6 – Determining energy demand and global costs

I-1

original state

building construction complex building construction and technical building system

1.

window

repl. only (1.4)

2.

window

repl. only (1.15)

3.

window

repl. only (0.8)

4. thermal

insulation

only (0.45)

5. thermal

insulation

only (0,30)

6. thermal

insulation

only (0.20.22)

7. complex

building

construction(1

.4 / 0.45)

8. complex

building

constructi

on (1.15 / 0.35)

9. complex

building

construction

(0.8 / 0.20.22)

10. complex

building

construction

, technical

building

system (1.4

/ 0.45)

11. complex

building

construction

, technical

building

system

(1.15 / 0.35)

12. complex

building

construction

, technical

building

system (0.8

/ 0.20.22)

13. complex

building

construction

, technical

building

system (0.8

/ 0.20.22)

construction material type concrete panel

repl. of all

doors,

windows with

U=1.4

W/m2K

repl. of all

doors,

windows

with

U=1.15

W/m2K

repl. of all

doors,

windows with

U=0.8

W/m2K

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.45

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,3 W/m2K

(flat roof),

U=0,5 W/m2K

(basement

slab)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.35

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0.2 W/m2K

(flat roof),

U=0,3 W/m2K

(basement

slab)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.2 W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,14

W/m2K (flat

roof),

U=0.20.22

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

measur

es 1.

and 4.

measur

es 2.

and 5.

measure

s 3. and

6.

measure

package 7 +

GI

1

measure

package 8 +

GI

1

measure

package 9 +

GI

1

measure

package 9 +

GI

1V

construction time 1960-1980

heated floor space (m2) 2880

number of floors 2

headroom (m) 3

basement no district heating district heating district heating district heating

Heating system type

district heating,

manifold inside heated

space, 70/55,

constant rev. pump,

central controller, no

air handling system

district heating, manifold inside heated space, 70/55, rev

control pump, time switch. thermostatic valves controls

energy carrier used

district heating electricity

rapid electricity

rapid electricity

rapid electricity

rapid

DHWG system type electric, instantaneous

electricity

electricity

electricity

electricity

energy carrier used electricity control, heat transfer appliances

replacement, DHWG system renovation,

Lighting upgrade, control, air handling

system installation heat recovery appliance

GI 1 +

solar cells,

34500

kWh/a

A/V

0.563

Ep (kWh/m2a) 284 223 219 213 204 193 186 142 127 114 86 71 57 23

Heating (kWh/m2a) 249 187 183 178 169 158 151 107 92 79 45 30 17 17

Domestic hot water (kWh/m2a) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20

Ventilation (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 12 12

Cooling (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lighting (kWh/m2a) 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 9 9 9 9

Natural gas (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Biomass (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

District heating (kWh/a) 572348 431044 421833 408665 387691 363547 347266 246024 211290 181502 102139 67405 37617 37617

Electricity (kWh/a) 41515 41515 41515 41515 41515 41515 41515 41515 41515 41515 48283 48283 47903 7883

Investment costs (HUF) 0 23 860 902 27 175 662 55 202 008 34 832 072 39 148 239 70 644 860 58 692 974 66 323 901 125 846 868 166 548 974 174 179 901 233 702 868 252 962 868

Residual value 11 930 451 13 587 831 27 601 004 17 416 036 19 574 120 35 322 430 29 346 487 33 161 951 62 923 434 29 346 487 33 161 951 62 923 434 62 923 434

Initial maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 432 000 432 000 432 000 552 000

Initial district heating fee (HUF/a) 8 070 109 6 077 721 5 947 840 5 762 178 5 466 438 5 126 013 4 896 448 3 468 933 2 979 184 2 559 181 1 440 158 950 408 530 405 530 405

Initial electricity fee (HUF/a) 1 540 214 1 540 214 1 540 214 1 540 214 1 540 214 1 540 214 1 540 214 1 540 214 1 540 214 1 540 214 1 791 307 1 791 307 1 777 203 292 461

Investment (HUF/m2) 8 285 9 436 19 167 12 094 13 593 24 529 20 380 23 029 43 697 57 830 60 479 81 147 87 834

Savings costs (HUF/kWh) 135 144 270 151 150 251 144 147 258 292 284 358 337

Static payback time (a) 12 13 24 13 13 22 13 13 23 28 27 34 31

Static global costs (HUF) 192 206 460 176 219 607 176 936 738 201 249 841 174 965 106 172 472 774 199 378 092 158 875 921 156 711 858 207 834 769 239 818 263 237 654 201 288 495 033 280 460 193

E1 D3 I (HUF) 190 408 177 167 411 920 167 193 769 183 837 973 163 014 329 159 259 305 177 540 671 139 914 400 135 547 272 170 376 082 219 687 870 215 320 743 249 903 291 245 638 962

E2 D3 I (HUF) 209 502 986 182 758 170 182 295 655 198 590 548 177 210 486 172 814 974 190 664 426 150 352 373 145 063 811 179 102 411 226 946 475 221 657 913 255 414 434 247 379 594

E1 D5 I (HUF) 161 515 879 146 841 015 147 328 332 167 138 714 145 334 733 143 023 691 164 927 419 130 571 889 128 413 843 170 045 839 215 892 361 213 734 315 255 157 974 254 886 055

E2 D5 I (HUF) 176 527 807 158 903 999 159 199 078 178 734 661 156 492 953 153 678 047 175 241 994 138 773 592 135 890 665 176 901 013 221 591 311 218 708 384 259 482 307 256 253 543

E1 D3 M (HUF) 207 225 732 175 634 219 174 583 426 186 432 561 168 034 461 162 773 797 175 614 906 136 326 688 129 573 443 154 155 178 185 846 951 179 093 706 203 456 988 197 515 218

E2 D3 M (HUF) 224 765 967 189 604 398 188 320 878 199 837 335 180 909 314 175 038 660 187 468 423 145 622 317 137 991 516 161 820 670 192 009 411 184 378 610 207 961 108 199 050 431

E1 D5 M (HUF) 186 733 441 162 702 325 162 272 737 176 708 868 157 688 489 153 737 069 169 546 588 133 556 058 128 790 054 158 941 144 189 504 295 184 738 291 214 642 725 205 732 048

E2 D5 M (HUF) 194 183 562 167 343 929 166 731 256 180 905 674 161 468 413 157 037 121 172 523 040 134 520 252 129 063 885 158 622 929 186 968 692 181 512 325 210 860 661 205 734 296

E1 D3 I (HUF/m2) 66 114 58 129 58 053 63 833 56 602 55 298 61 646 48 581 47 065 59 158 76 281 74 764 86 772 85 291

E2 D3 I (HUF/m2) 72 744 63 458 63 297 68 955 61 531 60 005 66 203 52 206 50 369 62 188 78 801 76 965 88 686 85 896

E1 D5 I (HUF/m2) 56 082 50 986 51 156 58 034 50 463 49 661 57 266 45 337 44 588 59 044 74 963 74 213 88 597 88 502

Page 44: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

E2 D5 I (HUF/m2) 61 294 55 175 55 277 62 061 54 338 53 360 60 848 48 185 47 184 61 424 76 941 75 940 90 098 88 977

E1 D3 M (HUF/m2) 71 953 60 984 60 619 64 734 58 345 56 519 60 977 47 336 44 991 53 526 64 530 62 185 70 645 68 582

E2 D3 M (HUF/m2) 78 044 65 835 65 389 69 388 62 816 60 777 65 093 50 563 47 914 56 188 66 670 64 020 72 209 69 115

E1 D5 M (HUF/m2) 64 838 56 494 56 345 61 357 54 753 53 381 58 870 46 374 44 719 55 188 65 800 64 145 74 529 71 435

E2 D5 M (HUF/m2) 67 425 58 106 57 893 62 814 56 065 54 527 59 904 46 708 44 814 55 077 64 920 63 025 73 216 71 436

Page 45: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 6 – Determining energy demand and global costs

I-2

original state

building construction complex building construction and technical building system

technical building system

complex

1. window

repl. only (1.4)

2.

window

repl. only (1.15)

3. window

repl. only (0.8)

4. thermal

insulation

only (0.45)

5. thermal

insulation

only (0,30)

6. thermal

insulation

only

(0.20.22)

7. complex

building

construction(

1.4 / 0.45)

8. complex

building

construction(1.

15 / 0.35)

9. complex

building

construction(0

.8 / 0.20.22)

10.

complex

building

constructio

n,

technical building system (1.4

/ 0.45)

11.

complex

building

constructio

n,

technical

building

system

(1.15 /

0.35)

12.

complex

building

constructio

n,

technical building system (0.8

/ 0.20.22)

13.

complex

building

constructio

n,

technical building system (0.8

/ 0.20.22)

14.

complex

building

constructio

n,

technical building system (1,0

/ 0.20.22)

15

.techni

cal

buildin

g

system

only

16.

complex

building

constructio

n, technical

building

system

(1.15 /

0.35)

17.

complex

building

construction

,

technical building system (0.8

/ 0.20.22)

construction material type terracotta brick

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.45

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,3 W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0,5 W/m2K

(basement

slab)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.35

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0.2 W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0,3 W/m2K

(basement

slab)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.2 W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,14

W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0.20.22

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

measure

package 7

+ GI 2

measure

package 8

+ GI 2

measure

package 9

+ GI 2

measure

package 9

+ GI 2V

12.a. measure

package

+ GI 2

GI 8

measure

package 8

+ GI 8

measure

package 9

+ GI 8

construction time 1960-1980

heated floor space (m2) 844

number of floors 1

headroom (m) 3.5

basement

partially

condensing

boiler

perm temp boiler,

manifold inside heated space

Heating system type , 90/70, perm rev cont. pump, central

all doors, windows

all doors, windows

all doors, windows

measures 1. and 4.

measures 2. and 5.

measures 3. and 6.

55/45 inside heated space, rev. control pump, electronic control opt. func., no storage

controller, no replacement U=1.4

replacement U=1.15

replacement U=0.8

air handling system

W/m2K W/m

2K W/m

2K

natural gas

natural gas

natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas

natural gas natural gas

energy carrier used natural gas

DHWG system type perm temp condensing

combi boiler combi boiler, natural

gas natural

gas natural gas natural gas natural gas natural

gas natural gas natural gas

energy carrier used natural gas

boiler replacement, control, heat transfer appliances replacement,

GI 2 +

boiler

replacement,

control., heat

transfer

appliances

replacement,

Lighting sys,

heat recovery

appliance

boiler replacement, Heating control, heat

transfer appliances replacement,

Lighting upgrade and control

Lighting upgrade, control, air handling system

Solar cells,

system installation heat recovery appliance

10000 kWh/a

A/V 0.793

Ep (kWh/m2a) 374 305 301 296 262 259 252 198 188 174 116 107 94 64 97 307 150 135

Heating (kWh/m2a) 349 279 275 271 236 233 226 172 162 148 80 71 59 59 61 287 130 116

Domestic hot water (kWh/m2a) 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11

Ventilation (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 16 16 16 16 0 0 0

Cooling (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lighting (kWh/m2a) 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

Natural gas (kWh/a) 303161 244678 241441 237327 208523 205308 199797 154377 145883 133962 76233 68759 58211 58211 60408 250909 118308 106281 Biomass (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 District heating (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Electricity (kWh/a) 5300 5300 5300 5300 5300 5300 5300 5300 5300 5300 8965 8870 8555 -1445 8622 3317 3317 3317 Investment costs (HUF) 0 6 187 013 7 046 514 14 313 606 7 052 061 7 964 461 13 151 881 13 239 074 15 010 975 27 465 487 44 846 874 46 618 775 59 073 287 65 894 537 65 894 537 16 578 278 30 358 007 40 218 009 Residual value 3 093 507 3 523 257 7 156 803 3 526 030 3 982 230 6 575 941 6 619 537 7 505 487 13 732 744 6 619 537 7 505 487 13 732 744 13 732 744 13 732 744 0 8 802 743 13 732 744 Initial maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 600 126 600 126 600 126 600 0 0 0 0 Initial natural gas fee (HUF/a) 3 577 302 2 887 203 2 848 998 2 800 455 2 460 577 2 422 633 2 357 599 1 821 654 1 721 417 1 580 752 899 548 811 353 686 895 686 895 712 809 2 960 723 1 396 030 1 254 111 Initial electricity fee (HUF/a) 196 642 196 642 196 642 196 642 196 642 196 642 196 642 196 642 196 642 196 642 332 600 329 093 317 408 -53 592 319 862 123 058 123 058 123 058

Investment (HUF/m2) 7 331 8 349 16 959 8 356 9 437 15 583 15 686 17 786 32 542 53 136 55 236 69 992 78 074 78 074 19 643 35 969 47 652

Savings costs (HUF/kWh) 106 114 217 75 81 127 89 95 162 206 207 249 252 281 289 160 199 Static payback time (a) 9 10 18 6 7 11 8 8 14 19 19 22 22 24 24 13 17 Static global costs (HUF) 75 478 881 67 863 909 67 959 313 74 255 550 60 196 440 60 349 949 64 236 698 53 604 992 53 372 162 63 013 366 72 021 837 71 959 705 81 691 340 81 092 590 86 547 964 78 253 902 60 739 760 67 761 391 E1 D3 I (HUF) 63 199 930 56 175 131 56 162 642 60 642 822 49 677 280 49 707 656 52 398 107 43 507 488 43 122 949 49 840 999 64 615 439 64 370 851 71 155 639 71 499 046 75 920 699 68 192 129 51 043 433 55 851 475 E2 D3 I (HUF) 69 248 997 61 153 604 61 081 845 65 486 718 53 993 901 53 965 412 56 554 972 46 832 908 46 292 865 52 792 693 66 855 605 66 465 289 73 027 321 72 428 571 77 838 817 73 097 792 53 521 688 58 109 563 E1 D5 I (HUF) 53 624 531 48 918 176 49 081 940 54 358 206 43 579 369 43 790 241 47 125 792 39 598 603 39 631 726 47 859 468 62 672 881 62 824 932 71 109 848 72 450 858 75 802 773 60 373 861 48 813 339 54 893 850 E2 D5 I (HUF) 58 382 015 52 833 438 52 950 575 58 167 598 46 973 960 47 138 523 50 394 704 42 213 428 42 124 218 50 180 287 64 433 092 64 470 524 72 580 274 73 182 442 77 309 714 64 232 307 50 762 174 56 669 482

Page 46: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

E1 D3 M (HUF) 60 992 689 53 361 186 53 235 085 56 615 056 46 946 426 46 854 869 48 775 419 40 143 901 39 536 066 44 397 786 54 194 729 53 727 635 58 670 889 58 295 603 62 506 040 62 919 068 44 654 357 48 008 320 E2 D3 M (HUF) 65 755 734 57 281 243 57 108 473 60 429 147 50 345 340 50 207 432 52 048 540 42 762 342 42 032 063 46 721 954 55 958 639 55 376 799 60 144 655 59 027 513 64 016 369 66 781 794 46 605 739 49 786 341 E1 D5 M (HUF) 54 262 560 48 456 604 48 469 284 52 476 095 42 954 477 43 005 042 45 433 545 37 875 594 37 596 627 43 647 080 54 034 438 53 865 221 59 941 569 58 824 427 63 730 027 57 269 568 43 404 994 47 760 900 E2 D5 M (HUF) 57 199 055 50 729 932 50 705 898 54 666 060 44 817 828 44 831 930 47 197 936 39 124 956 38 749 664 44 664 941 54 051 148 53 806 117 59 792 649 59 621 112 63 599 753 59 801 098 44 432 894 48 652 420

E1 D3 I (HUF/m2) 74 881 66 558 66 543 71 852 58 859 58 895 62 083 51 549 51 094 59 053 76 559 76 269 84 308 84 715 89 953 80 796 60 478 66 175

E2 D3 I (HUF/m2) 82 049 72 457 72 372 77 591 63 974 63 940 67 008 55 489 54 849 62 551 79 213 78 750 86 525 85 816 92 226 86 609 63 414 68 850

E1 D5 I (HUF/m2) 63 536 57 960 58 154 64 405 51 634 51 884 55 836 46 918 46 957 56 706 74 257 74 437 84 253 85 842 89 814 71 533 57 836 65 040

E2 D5 I (HUF/m2) 69 173 62 599 62 738 68 919 55 656 55 851 59 709 50 016 49 910 59 455 76 343 76 387 85 996 86 709 91 599 76 105 60 145 67 144

E1 D3 M (HUF/m2) 72 266 63 224 63 075 67 079 55 624 55 515 57 791 47 564 46 844 52 604 64 212 63 658 69 515 69 071 74 059 74 549 52 908 56 882

E2 D3 M (HUF/m2) 77 910 67 869 67 664 71 599 59 651 59 487 61 669 50 666 49 801 55 358 66 302 65 612 71 261 69 938 75 849 79 125 55 220 58 989

E1 D5 M (HUF/m2) 64 292 57 413 57 428 62 175 50 894 50 954 53 831 44 876 44 546 51 715 64 022 63 821 71 021 69 697 75 510 67 855 51 428 56 589

E2 D5 M (HUF/m2) 67 771 60 107 60 078 64 770 53 102 53 118 55 922 46 357 45 912 52 921 64 042 63 751 70 844 70 641 75 355 70 854 52 646 57 645

Page 47: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 6 – Determining energy demand and global costs

I-2

1. present requirements (1.4

/ 0.45)

building construction complex building construction, technical building system and electricity

1.

window

repl. only (1.15)

2. window

repl. only (0.8)

5. walls

(1.4 / 0.35)

6. walls

(1.4 /

0.20.22)

8. complex

building

construction(1.

15 / 0.35)

9. complex

building

construction(0.

8 / 0.20.22)

11. complex

building

construction

, technical

building

system

(1.15 / 0.35)

12. complex

building

construction,

technical building system (0.8

/ 0.20.22)

13. complex

building

construction,

technical building system (0.8

/ 0.20.22)

14. complex

building

construction,

technical building system (0.8

/ 0.20.22)

15. complex

building

construction

, technical

building

system

(1.15 / 0.35)

16. complex

building

construction,

technical building system (0.8

/ 0.20.22)

construction material type ceramics

repl. of all

doors,

windows

U=1.15

W/m2K

repl. of all

doors,

windows

U=0.8

W/m2K

tightening

requirements to

U=0.35 W/m2K

(facade),

U=0.2 W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0,3 W/m2K

(basement slab)

tightening

requirements to

U=0.2 W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,14 W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0.20.22

W/m2K

(basement slab)

Measures 2 and

5 combined

Measures 3 and

6 combined

measure

package 8

+ GI 3

measure

package 9

+ GI 3

measure

package 9

+ GI 4

measure

package 9

+ GI 4V

measure

package 8

+ GI 3 V

measure

package 9

+ GI 3 V

construction time 2012

heated floor space (m2) 2709

number of floors 4

headroom (m) 3

basement

yes

condensing

boiler

condensing

boiler

heat pump heating system

(60%) + condensing boiler

(40%)

condensing

boiler

condensing

boiler

Heating system type

condensing boiler, air handling system

installed, 55/45 inside heated space,

55/45 inside heated space, rev. control pump, electronic control opt. func., no storage

pump with governor, 1 central

controller, no storage

natural gas

natural gas

electricity, natural gas

Natural

gas + solar

energy

Natural

gas + solar

energy

energy carrier used

natural gas

condensing boiler, indirect heating, storage type, with circulation

DHWG system type

condensing boiler, indirect heating, storage

type, with circulation natural gas, electricity

energy carrier used natural gas, electricity

control, modern lighting,

modern heat recovery

appliance installation

new heat

generator,

cont., modern

lighting,

modern heat

recovery

appliance

control, modern lighting, modern heat recovery

appliance installation, solar cell system (10000

kWh/a)

A/V

0.426

Ep (kWh/m2a) 92 91 90 86 81 85 79 70 64 58 49 61 55

Heating (kWh/m2a) 39 38 36 33 28 32 26 17 11 5 5 17 11

Domestic hot water (kWh/m2a) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12

Ventilation (kWh/m2a) 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16

Cooling (kWh/m2a) 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10

Lighting (kWh/m2a) 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15

Natural gas (kWh/a) 132951 130277 126534 117311 104492 114638 98074 74677 58114 41997 41997 74677 58114

Biomass (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

District heating (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Electricity (kWh/a) 46514 46514 46514 46514 46514 46514 46514 46514 46514 46514 36514 36514 36514

Investment costs (HUF) 0 2 159 424 9 141 562 2 221 717 16 495 834 4 074 697 23 362 108 19 624 697 38 912 108 64 250 108 57 821 054 25 479 001 48 940 054

Residual value 634 392 5 227 860 1 110 858 8 247 917 1 745 250 13 475 777 1 745 250 13 475 777 13 475 777 13 475 777 1 745 250 13 475 777

Initial maintenance 540 000 406 350 406 350 406 350 406 350 406 350 406 350 406 350 406 350 406 350 766 350 766 350 766 350

Initial natural gas fee (HUF/a) 1 568 820 1 537 268 1 493 095 1 384 275 1 233 001 1 352 723 1 157 276 881 188 685 741 495 564 495 564 881 188 685 741

Initial electricity fee (HUF/a) 1 725 652 1 725 652 1 725 652 1 725 652 1 725 652 1 725 652 1 725 652 1 725 652 1 725 652 1 725 652 1 354 652 1 354 652 1 354 652

Investment (HUF/m2) 797 3 375 820 6 089 1 504 8 624 7 244 14 364 23 717 21 344 9 405 18 066

Savings costs (HUF/kWh) 808 1 424 142 580 222 670 337 520 706 499 306 490

Static payback time (a) 13 44 7 35 12 43 24 38 53 47 31 48

Page 48: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Static global costs (HUF) 76 689 449 75 544 830 81 643 507 72 547 255 83 795 902 73 769 192 89 147 673 79 888 487 95 266 968 116 801 435 110 152 381 85 522 791 105 074 914

E1 D3 I (HUF) 67 141 229 65 755 528 69 501 760 63 002 640 70 868 319 63 983 496 73 626 562 71 655 493 81 298 560 103 459 253 97 752 356 78 231 954 92 048 662

E2 D3 I (HUF) 73 957 342 72 522 693 76 200 396 69 532 457 77 163 455 70 464 364 79 804 221 77 404 839 86 744 696 108 610 357 101 961 303 83 039 142 96 552 642

E1 D5 I (HUF) 58 533 633 57 345 283 62 054 432 55 067 593 64 638 384 56 245 799 68 556 895 65 110 262 77 421 358 100 062 989 95 353 695 72 684 326 89 169 064

E2 D5 I (HUF) 63 884 895 62 658 037 67 313 275 60 193 629 69 579 800 61 333 327 73 405 893 69 622 310 81 694 876 104 104 408 98 656 273 76 457 533 92 703 740

E1 D3 M (HUF) 60 644 778 59 457 653 62 273 010 56 824 423 62 557 503 57 500 728 64 498 895 62 106 657 69 104 824 85 975 429 80 836 124 66 639 288 76 923 787

E2 D3 M (HUF) 66 011 796 64 786 129 67 547 527 61 966 011 67 514 303 62 603 773 69 363 194 66 633 701 73 393 121 90 031 416 84 150 255 70 424 475 80 470 228

E1 D5 M (HUF) 60 971 482 59 939 751 63 513 311 57 680 693 64 756 381 58 512 392 67 611 370 64 057 270 73 156 248 90 405 544 84 524 383 67 848 045 80 233 355

E2 D5 M (HUF) 58 080 735 57 018 683 60 549 795 54 612 603 61 542 921 55 413 981 64 325 140 60 505 726 69 416 885 86 483 425 81 547 870 65 242 105 77 439 597

E1 D3 I (HUF/m2) 24 785 24 273 25 656 23 257 26 160 23 619 27 179 26 451 30 011 38 191 36 084 28 879 33 979

E2 D3 I (HUF/m2) 27 301 26 771 28 129 25 667 28 484 26 011 29 459 28 573 32 021 40 092 37 638 30 653 35 641

E1 D5 I (HUF/m2) 21 607 21 168 22 907 20 328 23 861 20 763 25 307 24 035 28 579 36 937 35 199 26 831 32 916

E2 D5 I (HUF/m2) 23 582 23 130 24 848 22 220 25 685 22 641 27 097 25 700 30 157 38 429 36 418 28 224 34 221

E1 D3 M (HUF/m2) 22 386 21 948 22 987 20 976 23 092 21 226 23 809 22 926 25 509 31 737 29 840 24 599 28 396

E2 D3 M (HUF/m2) 24 368 23 915 24 934 22 874 24 922 23 110 25 605 24 597 27 092 33 234 31 063 25 996 29 705

E1 D5 M (HUF/m2) 22 507 22 126 23 445 21 292 23 904 21 599 24 958 23 646 27 005 33 372 31 201 25 045 29 617

E2 D5 M (HUF/m2) 21 440 21 048 22 351 20 160 22 718 20 456 23 745 22 335 25 625 31 924 30 103 24 083 28 586

Page 49: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 6 – Determining energy demand and global costs

IR-2

original state

building construction complex building construction, technical building system and electricity

1.

window

repl. only (1.4)

2.

window

repl. only (1.15)

3.

window

repl. only (0.8)

4. thermal

insulation

only (0.45)

5. thermal

insulation

only (0.35)

6. thermal

insulation

only (0.20.22)

7. complex

building

construction(1

.4 / 0.45)

8. complex

building

constructi

on (1.15 / 0.35)

9. complex

building

construction(0

.8 / 0.20.22)

10. complex

building

construction,

technical building system (1.4/ 0.45)

11. complex

building

construction

, techn. b.

system 1.15

/ 0.35)

12. complex

building

construction,

technical building system (0.8/ 0.20.22)

construction material type terracotta brick

repl. of all

doors,

windows

U=1.4

W/m2K

repl. of all

doors,

windows

U=1.15

W/m2K

repl. of all

doors,

windows

U=0.8

W/m2K

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.45

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,3 W/m2K

(attic slab)

, U=0,5

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.35

W/m2K

(facade),

U=0.2 W/m2K

(attic slab)

, U=0,3

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.2 W/m2K

(facade),

U=0,14

W/m2K (attic

slab)

, U=0.20.22

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

measur

es 1.

and 4.

measur

es 2.

and 5.

measures

3. and 6.

measure

package 7 +

GI 2

measure

package 8 +

GI 2

measure

package 9 +

GI 2

construction time 1900-1960

heated floor space(m2) 18160

number of floors 6

headroom (m) 2.9

basement

yes

condensing boiler

Heating system type

constant temp. boiler,

manifold inside heated

space, 90/70

55/45 inside heated space, rev. control pump,

electronic control opt. func., no storage

constant rev. pump, central controller, no air handling

system

natural gas natural gas natural gas

energy carrier used natural gas condensing boiler

DHWG system type

constant temp. boiler, indirect

heating, storage type

circulation

indirect

heating

storage

circulation

indirect

heating

storage

circulation

indirect

heating

storage

natural gas natural gas natural gas

energy carrier used natural gas boiler replacement, control, heat transfer

appliances replacement, Lighting upgrade,

control, air handling system installation heat

recovery appliance

A/V

0.236

Ep (kWh/m2a) 270 171 167 163 187 185 182 137 133 123 77 74 69

Heating (kWh/m2a) 229 130 126 123 147 144 141 97 92 83 20 17 13

Domestic hot water (kWh/m2a) 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 12 12 12

Ventilation (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 25 24

Cooling (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lighting (kWh/m2a) 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 19 19 19

Natural gas (kWh/a) 4391427 2595100 2528163 2464460 2895043 2853819 2798976 1989101 1906002 1738060 583695 533683 458702

Biomass (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

District heating (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Electricity (kWh/a) 204845 204845 204845 204845 204845 204845 204845 204845 204845 204845 332728 329895 318127

Investment costs (HUF) 0 101 803 444 115 945 992 235 521 459 71 938 978 81 419 239 100 502 709 173 742 422 197 365 231 336 024 168 555 907 613 579 530 422 718 189 359

Residual value 50 901 722 57 972 996 117 760 730 35 969 489 40 709 620 50 251 354 86 871 211 98 682 616 168 012 084 86 871 211 98 682 616 168 012 084

Initial maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 724 000 2 724 000 2 724 000

Initial natural gas fee (HUF/a) 51 818 834 30 622 185 29 832 326 29 080 625 34 161 502 33 675 069 33 027 919 23 471 394 22 490 819 20 509 105 6 887 600 6 297 457 5 412 681

Initial electricity fee (HUF/a) 7 599 742 7 599 742 7 599 742 7 599 742 7 599 742 7 599 742 7 599 742 7 599 742 7 599 742 7 599 742 12 344 191 12 239 088 11 802 507

Investment (HUF/m2) 5 606 6 385 12 969 3 961 4 483 5 534 9 567 10 868 18 504 30 612 31 912 39 548

Savings costs (HUF/kWh) 57 62 122 48 53 63 72 79 127 159 163 197

Static payback time (a) 5 5 10 4 4 5 6 7 11 15 15 18

Static global costs (HUF) 1 188 371 514 866 241 981 864 587 358 969 128 800 907 163 868 906 915 454 913 055 928 795 165 148 799 176 460 898 201 109 995 023 439 1 004 741 335 1 116 973 126

E1 D3 I (HUF) 998 439 422 718 427 556 715 528 513 790 032 975 755 815 006 754 590 697 757 673 408 651 337 317 652 154 555 720 003 753 893 755 270 899 260 362 977 813 331

E2 D3 I (HUF) 1 098 128 826 785 233 266 781 108 866 854 447 167 828 111 482 826 132 538 828 211 284 707 049 556 706 345 568 771 120 407 935 788 585 940 111 241 1 016 182 901

E1 D5 I (HUF) 846 959 417 629 984 259 630 393 056 717 877 665 655 654 063 656 538 282 663 025 733 587 643 099 593 128 865 678 836 953 859 242 171 868 711 044 963 522 806

E2 D5 I (HUF) 925 335 866 682 491 519 681 936 342 768 503 547 712 480 839 712 771 396 718 469 041 631 423 264 635 712 300 719 001 829 892 231 358 900 770 688 993 633 189

E1 D3 M (HUF) 957 098 497 672 109 382 667 422 911 723 800 205 712 319 453 709 875 076 710 332 950 597 520 567 595 179 899 642 573 552 746 188 918 748 544 746 806 945 034

E2 D3 M (HUF) 1 035 594 091 724 712 304 719 060 984 774 520 041 769 245 812 766 207 234 765 874 585 641 388 472 637 849 987 682 822 886 779 286 016 780 710 793 837 157 294

Page 50: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

E1 D5 M (HUF) 869 110 290 633 756 379 631 674 506 698 272 388 664 739 956 663 955 838 667 094 609 578 655 027 579 990 365 641 446 137 769 833 065 774 877 283 844 282 409

E2 D5 M (HUF) 899 536 642 643 813 290 640 972 383 706 847 899 678 198 062 676 946 493 679 463 370 581 840 210 582 233 241 641 784 636 744 988 987 749 733 979 819 401 616

E1 D3 I (HUF/m2) 54 980 39 561 39 401 43 504 41 620 41 552 41 722 35 867 35 912 39 648 49 216 49 519 53 844

E2 D3 I (HUF/m2) 60 470 43 240 43 013 47 051 45 601 45 492 45 606 38 934 38 896 42 463 51 530 51 768 55 957

E1 D5 I (HUF/m2) 46 639 34 691 34 713 39 531 36 104 36 153 36 510 32 359 32 661 37 381 47 315 47 837 53 057

E2 D5 I (HUF/m2) 50 955 37 582 37 552 42 318 39 234 39 250 39 563 34 770 35 006 39 593 49 132 49 602 54 715

E1 D3 M (HUF/m2) 52 704 37 010 36 752 39 857 39 225 39 090 39 115 32 903 32 774 35 384 41 090 41 219 44 435

E2 D3 M (HUF/m2) 57 026 39 907 39 596 42 650 42 359 42 192 42 174 35 319 35 124 37 600 42 912 42 991 46 099

E1 D5 M (HUF/m2) 47 858 34 898 34 784 38 451 36 605 36 561 36 734 31 864 31 938 35 322 42 392 42 669 46 491

E2 D5 M (HUF/m2) 49 534 35 452 35 296 38 923 37 346 37 277 37 415 32 040 32 061 35 341 41 024 41 285 45 121

Page 51: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 6 – Determining energy demand and global costs

IR-2

original state

building construction renovation

complex building construction, technical building system and electricity

1.

window

repl. only (1.4)

2.

window

repl. only (1.15)

3.

window

repl. only (0.8)

4. thermal

insulation

only (0.45)

5. thermal

insulation

only (0.35)

6. thermal

insulation

only (0.20.22)

7. complex

building

construction(1.

4 / 0.45)

8. complex

building

construction(1.

15 / 0.35)

9. complex

building

construction(0.

8 / 0.20.22)

10. complex

building

construction

, technical

building

system (1.4

/ 0.45)

11. complex

building

construction

, technical

building

system

(1.15 / 0.35)

12. complex

building

construction

, technical

building

system (0.8

/ 0.20.22)

13. complex

building

construction

, technical

building

system (1,0

/ 0.20.22)

construction material type terracotta brick

repl. of all

doors,

windows

U=1.4

W/m2K

repl. of all

doors,

windows

U=1.15

W/m2K

repl. of all

doors,

windows

U=0.8

W/m2K

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0,3 W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0,5 W/m2K

(basement

slab)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0.2 W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0,3 W/m2K

(basement

slab)

improvement

of building

envelope

efficiency to

U=0,14

W/m2K (attic

slab),

U=0.20.22

W/m2K

(basement

slab)

measure

s 1. and

4.

measur

es 2.

and 5.

measur

es 3.

and 6.

measure

package 7 +

GI 5

measure

package 8 +

GI 5

measure

package 9 +

GI 5

12a.

measure

package + GI

5

construction time 1900-1960

heated floor space(m2) 13280

number of floors 9

headroom (m) 2.65

basement

no

condensing

boiler

condensing

boiler

condensing

boiler

condensing

boiler

Heating system type

steam boiler, without

control, no circulation,

no air handling system

55/45 inside heated space, rev. control pump, electronic

control opt. func., no storage

natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas

energy carrier used

natural gas

combi

condensing

boiler

combi

condensing

boiler

combi

condensing

boiler

combi

condensing

boiler

DHWG system type

steam boiler,

constant temp.

boiler,

electric, instantaneous

circulation

indirect

heating storage

circulation

indirect

heating storage

circulation

indirect

heating storage

circulation

indirect

heating storage

natural gas natural gas natural gas natural gas

energy carrier used natural gas boiler replacement, control, heat transfer appliances

replacement, Lighting upgrade, control, air handling

system installation heat recovery appliance, cooling

system installation

A/V

0.239

Ep (kWh/m2a) 290 207 203 196 268 267 261 185 175 175 111 105 108 104

Heating (kWh/m2a) 238 155 151 144 216 215 209 133 123 122 56 50 52 49

Domestic hot water (kWh/m2a) 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 12 12 12 12

Ventilation (kWh/m2a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 16 16

Cooling (kWh/m2a) 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9

Lighting (kWh/m2a) 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 19 19 19 19

Natural gas (kWh/a) 3371453 2276242 2216677 2124728 3080222 3064286 2992441 1981426 1844744 1839075 898949 816658 851502 805962

Biomass (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

District heating (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Electricity (kWh/a) 191498 191498 191498 191498 191498 191498 191498 191498 191498 191498 232666 232666 232666 232660

Investment costs (HUF) 0 136 509 862 155 473 830 315 814 481 6 816 286 8 690 510 15 678 185 143 326 147 164 164 340 331 492 666 566 928 517 587 766 710 755 095 036 638 549 832

Residual value 68 254 931 77 736 915 157 907 241 3 408 143 4 345 255 7 839 092 71 663 074 82 082 170 165 746 333 71 663 074 82 082 170 165 746 333 107 473 731

Initial maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 992 000 1 992 000 1 992 000 1 992 000

Initial natural gas fee (HUF/a) 39 783 140 26 859 657 26 156 792 25 071 787 36 346 622 36 158 577 35 310 808 23 380 828 21 767 983 21 701 084 10 607 594 9 636 566 10 047 721 9 510 353

Initial electricity fee (HUF/a) 7 104 561 7 104 561 7 104 561 7 104 561 7 104 561 7 104 561 7 104 561 7 104 561 7 104 561 7 104 561 8 631 894 8 631 894 8 631 894 8 631 697

Investment (HUF/m2) 10 279 11 707 23 781 513 654 1 181 10 793 12 362 24 962 42 690 44 260 56 860 48 084

Savings costs (HUF/kWh) 125 135 253 23 28 41 103 108 216 239 240 312 259

Static payback time (a) 11 11 21 2 2 4 9 9 18 22 22 29 24

Static global costs (HUF) 937 754 027 815 794 222 820 700 889 959 341 447 875 839 939 873 953 267 863 985 569 753 033 931 741 615 220 907 605 571 991 558 274 992 975 899 1 168 527 329 1 041 230 819

E1 D3 I (HUF) 788 711 382 672 190 236 674 255 095 772 872 259 736 259 962 734 482 900 725 406 862 619 031 936 607 258 263 727 972 804 895 738 162 894 687 409 1 023 388 861 929 550 645

E2 D3 I (HUF) 868 471 543 731 901 386 732 875 845 829 809 773 810 688 836 808 620 048 798 228 814 673 346 160 659 070 378 779 681 135 934 115 136 931 557 965 1 060 897 268 966 224 898

E1 D5 I (HUF) 668 999 955 597 809 211 603 408 636 719 625 904 625 870 702 624 742 842 618 458 163 554 080 076 548 315 872 684 703 267 858 981 591 862 317 217 1 005 482 573 902 205 433

E2 D5 I (HUF) 731 701 443 644 738 393 649 480 015 764 373 102 684 378 133 683 020 776 675 701 448 596 763 564 589 030 983 725 336 732 889 117 806 891 268 352 1 034 935 497 931 002 141

E1 D3 M (HUF) 754 468 519 623 389 811 622 876 669 697 226 007 702 709 901 700 738 367 691 011 883 570 945 833 556 766 885 651 614 113 752 610 384 748 827 908 851 418 894 775 894 830

E2 D3 M (HUF) 817 271 796 670 406 464 669 034 741 742 058 695 761 315 313 759 114 074 748 352 002 613 712 938 597 563 827 692 329 335 782 828 473 777 859 842 880 953 073 804 772 195

E1 D5 M (HUF) 689 456 329 594 070 851 596 340 832 684 548 519 645 038 000 643 577 648 636 049 085 549 051 412 539 604 330 646 792 388 759 204 856 758 876 222 872 856 109 789 899 010

E2 D5 M (HUF) 709 578 804 601 774 187 603 368 732 690 533 757 661 858 067 660 217 009 651 873 762 553 411 682 542 414 697 649 538 466 747 397 505 746 135 737 860 510 734 777 037 740

Page 52: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

E1 D3 I (HUF/m2) 59 391 50 617 50 772 58 198 55 441 55 307 54 624 46 614 45 727 54 817 67 450 67 371 77 062 69 996

E2 D3 I (HUF/m2) 65 397 55 113 55 186 62 486 61 046 60 890 60 108 50 704 49 629 58 711 70 340 70 147 79 887 72 758

E1 D5 I (HUF/m2) 50 377 45 016 45 437 54 189 47 129 47 044 46 571 41 723 41 289 51 559 64 682 64 934 75 714 67 937

E2 D5 I (HUF/m2) 55 098 48 550 48 907 57 558 51 534 51 432 50 881 44 937 44 355 54 619 66 952 67 114 77 932 70 106

E1 D3 M (HUF/m2) 56 812 46 942 46 903 52 502 52 915 52 766 52 034 42 993 41 925 49 067 56 672 56 388 64 113 58 426

E2 D3 M (HUF/m2) 61 542 50 482 50 379 55 878 57 328 57 162 56 352 46 213 44 997 52 133 58 948 58 574 66 337 60 600

E1 D5 M (HUF/m2) 51 917 44 734 44 905 51 547 48 572 48 462 47 895 41 344 40 633 48 704 57 169 57 144 65 727 59 480

E2 D5 M (HUF/m2) 53 432 45 314 45 434 51 998 49 839 49 715 49 087 41 673 40 844 48 911 56 280 56 185 64 797 58 512

Page 53: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

6. Annex 6 – Determining energy demand and global costs

IR-2

1. present requirements (1.4

/ 0.45)

building construction complex building construction, technical building system and electricity

1. window repl.

only (1.15)

2. window repl.

only (0.8)

5. walls (0.35)

6. walls (0.20.22)

8. complex

building

construction(1.

15 / 0.35)

9. complex

building

construction(0.

8 / 0.20.22)

11. complex

building

construction,

technical building system (1.15 /

0.35)

12. complex

building

construction,

technical building system (0.8 /

0.20.22)

13. 12 30000 kWp PV

construction material type ceramics

measure

package 8 +

GI 7

measure

package 9 +

GI 7

measure

package 9 + GI

7 +

PV

construction time 2012

heated floor space(m2) 10891

number of floors 2

headroom (m) 3

condensing boiler condensing boiler condensing

basement yes boiler

Heating system type

condensing boiler

repl. of all doors,

windows U=1.15

W/m2K

repl. of all doors,

windows U=0.8

W/m2K

tightening

requirements to

U=0.35 W/m2K

(facade), U=0.2

W/m2K

(attic slab), U=0,3

W/m2K

(basement slab)

tightening

requirements to

U=0.2 W/m2K

(facade), U=0,14

W/m2K

(attic slab),

U=0.20.22

W/m2K

(basement slab)

Measures 2 and

5 combined

Measures 3 and

6 combined

55/45 inside heated space, pump with governor, electronic

control opt. func., no storage

55/45 inside heated

space, pump with

governor, electronic

control opt. func., no storage

natural gas

natural gas

natural gas

energy carrier used

natural gas

combi condensing

boiler, rapid water

heater

combi condensing

boiler, rapid water

heater

combi

condensing

boiler, rapid water heater

DHWG system type

condensing boiler, heat

exchanger, with storage option

circulation indirect

heating storage

circulation indirect

heating storage

circulation indirect

heating storage

natural gas natural gas natural gas

energy carrier used natural gas control, modern lighting, control, modern

A/V

0.313

heat recovery appliance installation

Ep (kWh/m2a) 111 109 107 106 100 104 95 99 91 84

Heating (kWh/m2a) 47 45 43 42 36 40 32 35 27 27

Domestic hot water (kWh/m2a) 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16

Ventilation (kWh/m2a) 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16

Cooling (kWh/m2a) 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13

Lighting (kWh/m2a) 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19

Natural gas (kWh/a) 663744 642552 612882 603498 543154 582305 492292 531059 441046 441046

Biomass (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

District heating (kWh/a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Electricity (kWh/a) 218844 218844 218861 218844 218844 218844 218844 218844 218844 188844

Investment costs (HUF) 0 11 139 084 47 155 456 10 557 688 31 384 331 20 400 214 74 685 570 62 999 980 119 036 307 138 296 307

Residual value 1 847 138 15 221 781 2 639 422 7 846 083 4 486 560 23 067 864 28 590 311 36 450 290 46 080 290

Initial maintenance 1 633 650 1 633 650 1 633 650 1 633 650 1 633 650 1 633 650 1 633 650 1 633 650 1 633 650 1 633 650

Initial natural gas fee (HUF/a) 7 832 180 7 582 108 7 232 007 7 121 277 6 409 218 6 871 205 5 809 044 6 266 499 5 204 338 5 204 338

Initial electricity fee (HUF/a) 8 119 103 8 119 103 8 119 750 8 119 103 8 119 103 8 119 103 8 119 103 8 119 103 8 119 103 7 006 103

Investment (HUF/m2) 1 023 4 330 969 2 882 1 873 6 858 5 785 10 930 12 698

Savings costs (HUF/kWh) 526 928 175 260 250 436 475 535 465

Static payback time (a) 45 79 15 22 21 37 40 45 37

Static global costs (HUF) 527 548 011 531 184 923 556 717 649 516 778 594 516 243 456 519 118 948 541 539 483 543 577 550 567 749 056 553 619 056

E1 D3 I (HUF) 426 875 967 431 547 113 454 197 850 420 093 931 422 524 896 423 468 518 445 976 759 442 553 387 471 111 926 459 300 154

E2 D3 I (HUF) 497 280 785 501 143 380 522 665 735 488 200 207 488 328 893 490 766 243 509 840 232 507 895 936 533 020 224 515 028 526

E1 D5 I (HUF) 345 969 165 352 194 568 379 028 503 343 118 836 349 965 553 348 047 680 379 158 294 374 550 673 409 713 470 405 592 377

E2 D5 I (HUF) 395 110 622 400 768 964 426 811 513 390 648 258 395 880 319 395 010 042 423 712 115 420 141 812 452 896 070 444 473 097

E1 D3 M (HUF) 406 817 985 409 078 944 424 932 312 397 449 254 395 328 305 398 689 300 410 393 276 410 290 013 426 758 003 413 850 465

E2 D3 M (HUF) 462 254 850 463 879 154 478 844 032 451 076 243 447 142 475 451 679 634 460 679 475 461 740 839 475 504 694 457 731 073

E1 D5 M (HUF) 343 111 843 346 596 625 365 743 850 336 838 943 338 194 963 339 302 813 357 780 311 356 744 568 378 412 762 371 560 877

E2 D5 M (HUF) 381 805 903 384 844 181 403 368 267 374 263 685 374 348 322 376 281 051 392 862 060 392 643 104 412 414 809 402 175 617

Page 54: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

E1 D3 I (HUF/m2) 39 195 39 624 41 704 38 573 38 796 38 882 40 949 40 635 43 257 42 172

E2 D3 I (HUF/m2) 45 660 46 014 47 991 44 826 44 838 45 062 46 813 46 634 48 941 47 289

E1 D5 I (HUF/m2) 31 767 32 338 34 802 31 505 32 133 31 957 34 814 34 391 37 619 37 241

E2 D5 I (HUF/m2) 36 279 36 798 39 189 35 869 36 349 36 269 38 905 38 577 41 584 40 811

E1 D3 M (HUF/m2) 37 354 37 561 39 017 36 493 36 299 36 607 37 682 37 672 39 184 37 999

E2 D3 M (HUF/m2) 42 444 42 593 43 967 41 417 41 056 41 473 42 299 42 397 43 660 42 028

E1 D5 M (HUF/m2) 31 504 31 824 33 582 30 928 31 053 31 154 32 851 32 756 34 745 34 116

E2 D5 M (HUF/m2) 35 057 35 336 37 037 34 364 34 372 34 550 36 072 36 052 37 867 36 927

Page 55: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 7 – Optimal level of overall energy performance (Ep value)

Building category

Single apartment improvement New

single

family

Multi-apartment improvement

New multi-apart.

School building improvement

New

school b.

Office

improve

ment

non-

major

imp

New office

Building code CSH-1 CSH-2 CSH-3 CSH-4 CSH-5 average CSH-6 TH-1 TH-2 average TH-3 I-1 I-2 average I-3 IR-1 IR-2 IR-3

op

tim

al le

ve

l o

f o

ve

rall e

ne

rgy

pe

rfo

rma

nce

(E

p)

in k

Wh

/m2a

E1 D3 I (HUF)

132 146 174 126 125 141 132 104 121 113 138 127 188 158 86 137 175 106

E2 D3 I (HUF)

132 86 174 126 125 129 77 104 121 113 138 127 188 158 86 133 175 106

E1 D5 I (HUF)

177 146 174 126 125 150 132 172 121 147 138 127 198 163 86 137 175 106

E2 D5 I (HUF)

177 146 174 126 125 150 132 172 121 147 138 127 188 158 86 137 175 106

E1 D3 M (HUF

132 127 174 126 108 134 77 104 121 113 131 127 188 158 86 133 175 100

E2 D3 M (HUF

132 86 136 126 108 118 77 78 121 99 131 127 188 158 86 133 175 100

E1 D5 M (HUF

132 127 174 126 125 137 122 104 121 113 138 127 188 158 86 137 175 106

E2 D5 M (HUF

132 127 174 126 125 137 122 104 121 113 138 127 188 158 86 137 175 106

average 143 124 170 126 121 137 109 118 121 119 136 127 189 158 86 136 175 104

A/V factor 1.11 1.09 1.10 1.08 0.94 1.07 1.25 0.28 0.77 0.53 0.77 0.56 0.79 0.68 0.43 0.56 0.79 0.31

Ep value 134 134 134 133 129 133 100 110 124 117 100 106 120 121 85 139 146 100

de

via

tio

n o

f o

ptim

um

fro

m

req

uir

em

en

ts (

as %

of

req

.)

E1 D3 I (HUF)

2 -9 -30 5 3 -6 -32 6 2 4 -38 -20 -57 -30 -1 1 -20 -6

E2 D3 I (HUF)

2 35 -30 5 3 3 23 6 2 4 -38 -20 -57 -30 -1 5 -20 -6

E1 D5 I (HUF)

-31 -9 -30 5 3 -13 -32 -56 2 -26 -38 -20 -66 -34 -1 1 -20 -6

E2 D5 I (HUF)

-31 -9 -30 5 3 -13 -32 -56 2 -26 -38 -20 -57 -30 -1 1 -20 -6

E1 D3 M (HUF

2 5 -30 5 16 0 23 6 2 4 -31 -20 -57 -30 -1 5 -20 0

E2 D3 M (HUF

2 35 -2 5 16 11 23 29 2 15 -31 -20 -57 -30 -1 5 -20 0

E1 D5 M (HUF

2 5 -30 5 3 -3 -22 6 2 4 -38 -20 -57 -30 -1 1 -20 -6

E2 D5 M (HUF

2 5 -30 5 3 -3 -22 6 2 4 -38 -20 -57 -30 -1 1 -20 -6

average -7 7 -27 5 6 -3 -9 -7 2 -2 -36 -20 -58 -30 -1 3 -20 -4

Page 56: COST OPTIMISATION ASSESSMENT OF THE ENERGY … · cost optimisation assessment of the energy performance of buildings in hungary report to the european commission march 2018. 2 table

Annex 8 – Optimal level of thermal transmittance (U value)

Building category

Single apartment

improvement

New single

family

Multi-apartment improvement

New multi-apart.

School building improvement

New

school b.

Office

improve

ment

Non-

major

imp.

New office

Building code CSH-1 CSH-2 CSH-3 CSH-4 CSH-5 CSH-6 TH-1 TH-2 TH-3 I-1 I-2 I-3 IR-1 IR-2 IR-3

Win

dow

therm

.

trans.

optim

um

(W/m

2K

)

E1 D3 I (F U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.4 U1.15 U1.4 U1.4 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.4 U1.4

E2 D3 I (F U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.4 U1.15 U1.4 U1.4 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.4 U1.4

E1 D5 I (F U1.15 U1.4 U1.4 U1.4 U1.15 U1.4 U1.4 U1.4 U1.4 U1.4 U1.4 U1.15 U1.4 U1.4 U1.4

E2 D5 I (F U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.4 U1.15 U1.4 U1.4 U1.4 U1.4 U1.4 U1.4 U1.15 U1.15 U1.4 U1.4

E1 D3 M ( U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.4

E2 D3 M ( U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.4

E1 D5 M ( U1.15 U1.4 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.4 U1.15 U1.4 U1.4 U1.15 U1.4 U1.15 U1.15 U1.4 U1.4

E2 D5 M ( U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.4 U1.15 U1.4 U1.4 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.15 U1.4 U1.4

Non-t

ranspare

nt

surf

. th

erm

. tr

ans.

optim

um

range

(W/m

2K

)

E1 D3 I (F U0.2 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.45 U0.45 U0.45 U0.35 U0.45 U0.35 U0.35 U0.2 U0.35

E2 D3 I (F U0.2 U0.2 U0.2 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.45 U0.45 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.2 U0.35

E1 D5 I (F U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.45 U0.45 U0.45 U0.35 U0.45 U0.35 U0.45 U0.2 U0.35

E2 D5 I (F U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.45 U0.45 U0.45 U0.35 U0.45 U0.35 U0.45 U0.2 U0.35

E1 D3 M ( U0.2 U0.35 U0.2 U0.2 U0.35 U0.2 U0.2 U0.45 U0.45 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.2 U0.2

E2 D3 M ( U0.2 U0.2 U0.2 U0.2 U0.2 U0.2 U0.2 U0.45 U0.45 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.2 U0.2 U0.2

E1 D5 M ( U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.45 U0.45 U0.35 U0.45 U0.35 U0.35 U0.2 U0.35

E2 D5 M ( U0.35 U0.35 U0.2 U0.35 U0.35 U0.35 U0.2 U0.45 U0.45 U0.35 U0.45 U0.35 U0.35 U0.2 U0.35

Window optimum weighted average

Requirement

Deviation

window 1.4 1.15 0.8 U (W/m

2K) %

63 86.25 0 1.244 1.15 -8.15217

sum

sum

Number of optimal cases

U1.4 U1.15 U0.8

5 10 0

5 10 0

12 3 0

9 6 0

1 14 0

1 14 0

7 8 0

5 10 0

45 75 0

U0.45 U0.35 U0.2

4 9 2

2 9 4

5 9 1

5 9 1

2 6 7

2 3 10

3 11 1

3 9 3

26 65 29

Non-transparent constr. weighted average Requirement Deviation

wall 0.45 0.35 0.20.22 U (W/m

2K) %

11.7 22.75 6.38 0.340 0.24 -41.7708

roof 0.3 0.2 0.14

7.8 13 4.06 0.207 0.17 -21.8627

basement 0.5 0.3 0.20.22

13 19.5 6.38 0.324 0.26 -24.6154