4-1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.
Cost Leadership Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-1 Chapter...
-
Upload
winfred-stevens -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Cost Leadership Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-1 Chapter...
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-11
Chapter 4Chapter 4
Cost Leadership
2
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-22
Mission Objectives
ExternalAnalysis
InternalAnalysis
StrategicChoice
StrategyImplementation
CompetitiveAdvantage
The Strategic Management Process
Business LevelStrategy
Corporate LevelStrategy
How to Position aBusiness
in the Market?
Which Businessesto Enter?
Cost Leadership
3
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-33
Business level strategy• Business level strategy refers to the
strategic choices managers make about how to position a specific business and/or product line to gain competitive advantage in a single market or industry.
Cost Leadership
4
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-44
Business Level Strategies
Two Generic Business Level Strategies
Cost Leadership:
• cost leadership strategy is intended to generate competitive advantage by achieving costs that are lower than all competitors
Product Differentiation:
• generate economic value by offering a productthat customers prefer over competitors’ product
Cost Leadership
5
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-55
Understanding Cost Advantage
Managers need to understand who hasthe cost advantage in their market
• it could be the focal firm
• it could be a competitor
• develop a strategy to exploit the advantage
• develop a strategy to either capture theadvantage or compete on some other basis
Cost Leadership
6
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-66
SOURCES OF COST ADVANTAGES
• Managers facing a strategic decision about how to position a business within an industry need to understand several fundamental cost issues.
• A sound understanding of these issues will help managers determine whether their focal firm is likely to generate competitive advantage by competing on cost.
• Alternatively, managers may recognize that other firms have a clear cost advantage and therefore their focal firm should choose to compete on some other basis—such as product differentiation.
Cost Leadership
7
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-77
Sources of Cost Advantage
Economies of Scale
• average cost per unit falls as quantity increases-until the minimum efficient scale is reached
• fixed overhead costs may be spread over larger volumes of production—lowering per unit cost of production
• exist because of specialized machines and the specialization of employees
Cost Leadership
8
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-88
Sources of Cost Advantage
Diseconomies of Scale
• are an advantage for those who do not havediseconomies of scale
• occur when firms become too large and bureaucratic•Transportation costs•Human factors—overly bureaucratic, de-motivated
NUCOR Nucor Steel had several cost advantages, one of which was the fact that the large integrated mills were experiencing diseconomies of scale in the parts of the market that Nucor served
Cost Leadership
9
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-99
Sources of Cost AdvantageLearning Curve Economies• a firm gets more efficient at a process with experience
• the more complicated/technical the process,the greater the experience advantage
Example: Fuel Injectors One of the Big Three U.S. auto makers licensed technology from Robert Bosch, a German company, to produce fuel injectors. The basic terms of the agreement were that Bosch would share new technology within six months of any such new technology being put into production. As a result of this agreement the U.S. company was always behind Bosch in both quality and price because Bosch was essentially guaranteed a learning curve advantage. Eventually the U.S. company exited the fuel injector business and purchased its fuel injectors from Bosch and/or Nippondenso, a Japanese manufacturer.
Cost Leadership
10
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-1010
Sources of Cost Advantage
• Differential Low-Cost Access to Productive Inputs
• result when firms are able to access inputs at less cost than competitors
• are one of the main motivations behind international expansion—low cost labor and raw materials have often been the target of international expansion
Cost Leadership
11
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-1111
Sources of Cost Advantage
• usually result from some historical artifact—being the first firm to discover the value of a raw material and being able to lock up the source
• are very difficult to achieve if the input is found in competitive markets where the value of the input is known and is subject to any form of bidding
• One practice in the carpet business that is indicative of a differential low-cast access to inputs-advantage occurs when a retail flooring chain buys all the output of a mill in a particular style of carpet. The retail chain gets a low price on the carpet and no competitor can sell that particular carpet.
Cost Leadership
12
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-1212
Sources of Cost Advantage
Technology Independent of Scale
Example: Vegetable Inspection This technology is in use in the potato packing business. Instead of paying several laborers to inspect potatoes as they pass over a conveyor, processing companies can invest in this technology that greatly reduces cost. While there is certainly economic value in the technology for potato processors, most of the value is being captured by the firm that invented and produces the inspection machinery.
• arise when a technology allows a firm to produce something at lower cost than competitors who do notpossess the technology
• size of the advantage depends both on how valuableand protectable the technology is
Cost Leadership
13
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-1313
Sources of Cost Advantage
Policy Choices
• firms get to choose how they will serve the market
• we’ll offer level of quality that is inexpensive toproduce
• firms can make policy choices that give people incentives to reduce cost at every opportunity
Example: Southwest Airlines
Cost Leadership
14
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-1414
Cost Leadership & Competitive Advantage
A source of cost advantage will lead to competitive advantage if that source is:
• Valuable
• Rare
• Costly to Imitate
• Organized (Implemented Appropriately)
Cost Leadership
15
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-1515
Value of a Cost Advantage
• Threat of Entry• A cost advantage presents a barrier to entry because would-be
entrants face the investment cost of matching an incumbent’s cost position
• Threat of Rivalry• a cost advantage can be used to manage the threat of rivalry• a recognized cost leader can establish a price in a competitive market
and other firms will not rationally go below that price, thus attenuating rivalry
• if a firm chooses to offer lower prices, then it can expect increased rivalry
• Threat of Substitutes• a cost leader’s market offering is more attractive if the price to
consumers is less than the price of substitutes
Cost Leadership
16
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-1616
Value of a Cost Advantage
• Threat of Suppliers• cost leaders in a market typically have large market share—
meaning they will be important customers to the suppliers in the industry
• the threat of suppliers will be reduced because of the suppliers desire to keep the cost leader as a customer—nobody wants to lose their best customers
• Threat of Buyers• cost leaders can reduce the threat of buyers.• lowers incentives for buyers to vertically integrate because they will
often not have costs as low as an incumbent cost leader.
Cost Leadership
17
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-1717
Rareness of a Cost AdvantageThe rareness of a source of cost advantagedepends heavily on the industry life cycle:
Economies of Scale
Diseconomies of Scale
Learning Curve Economies
Technology
Policy Choices
Differential Input Access
Not Rare Rare
Emerging Mature
Rare Rare
Not RareRare
Rare Rare
Not RareRare
Rare Rare
Generally…
Cost Leadership
18
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-1818
Rareness of a Cost Advantage
• Economies of Scale:• are less likely to be rare in emerging industries because
multiple firms are discovering where the minimum efficient scale is
• may become more rare as the industry matures if the minimum efficient scale is discovered to be quite large and if industry demand roughly equals industry capacity—such that an incremental plant at minimum efficient scale would vastly exceed industry demand—this is even more likely as an industry declines
Cost Leadership
19
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-1919
Rareness of a Cost Advantage
• Diseconomies of Scale:• are likely to be rare in emerging and mature industries
because most firms will not exceed the minimum efficient scale
• may become less rare in a declining industry if demand falls sharply leaving most firms with excess capacity—this is not a likely scenario
• Learning Curve Economies:• are likely to be rare in an emerging industry because the
first-mover is moving along the learning curve ahead of competitors
Cost Leadership
20
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-2020
Rareness of a Cost Advantage
• are likely to become less rare as the industry matures as competitors also move along the learning curve—as the learning curve flattens the advantage of more cumulative experience lessens
• Differential Low-Cost Access to Inputs:• may be rare in emerging industries if the inputs themselves
are rare, such as mineral deposits or input factor markets that are of limited size, otherwise there is not likely to differential low-cost access
• may arise (and be rare by definition) as the industry matures if a firm is able to tie-up sources of supply by acquiring suppliers or forming exclusivity agreements with suppliers
•
Cost Leadership
21
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-2121
Rareness of a Cost Advantage
• Technology Advantages:• are likely to be rare in emerging industries as the new
technologies are developed• usually become less rare over time as duplication occurs
or as competitors are able to buy the same technology—some technology can remain rare if the firm is able to protect its proprietary nature, especially software technology as opposed to hardware technology
Cost Leadership
22
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-2222
Rareness of a Cost Advantage
• Policy Choices:• valuable policies may be rare in emerging industries as
many different firms establish various policies—some firms will adopt policies that prove to be valuable and others will adopt policies that prove to have little, if any, value
• some valuable policy choices will remain rare if those policies are 1) difficult to observe and/or understand, or 2) if the adoption of those policies is costly
Cost Leadership
23
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-2323
Imitability of Sources of Cost Advantage
Conditions largely determine if a source of cost advantage will be costly to imitate
• Low Cost Conditions• Non-Proprietary Technology• technology cost advantages based on technology that is not owned and
tightly controlled by the focal firm will be less costly to imitate, especially if vendors can sell the technology to the focal firm’s competitors
• Highly Observable Technology• technology advantages based on technology that is highly observable can
be imitated at lower cost, even when the technology is proprietary because competitors can more easily see a way around the protection (patents)
•
•
Cost Leadership
24
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-2424
Imitability of Sources of Cost Advantage
Conditions largely determine if a source of cost advantage will be costly to imitate
• Low Cost Conditions
• Transactional Exchange• cost advantages such as differential low cost access to inputs and
policy choices that are based on transactional exchanges are easily imitated
• Example: The bonus policy of an appliance manufacturer that has a cost advantage because it uses a bonus system with production line employees to reduce defective parts can easily be imitated.
Cost Leadership
25
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-2525
Imitability of Sources of Cost Advantage
• High Cost Conditions• Path Dependence (Historical Uniqueness)• cost advantages that developed through a set of unique historical
circumstances may be very costly, if not impossible, to imitate
Example: A grain elevator built decades ago along the Columbia River in Washington State provides a cost advantage for its owners. The elevator occupies the only location for miles along the river in which an elevator could be built without incurring tremendous earth-moving expenses.
• Protected Technology• a technology protected by patent, copyright, trademark, etc. will present a
higher cost of imitation than unprotected technologies—although such protection does not guarantee that imitation will not occur
•
Cost Leadership
26
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-2626
Imitability of Sources of Cost Advantage
• High Cost Conditions• Highly Unobservable Technology• a cost advantage based on a relatively unobservable technology will
present a high cost of imitation to competitors because they will not know what to imitate
• Relational Exchange• cost advantages that stem from socially embedded exchanges are
more costly to imitate because competitors face the cost (or impossibility) of recreating socially complex relationships
• Example: Suppose the appliance manufacturer in the example above had a corporate culture based on years of experience and life long employees that encouraged low defect rates. Such an advantage would be much more difficult to imitate than an advantage based simply on paying people for lower defect rates.
Cost Leadership
27
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-2727
Implementing a Cost Leadership Strategy
A strategy is only as good as its implementation
Strategy is implemented through organizationalstructure and control:
• structure: 1) refers to how management responsibilities are divided and the reporting relationships among various managers.
• control: refers to the policies a firm adopts to give people incentives to behave in certain ways. Align
the interests of the individual with the interests of theorganization
Cost Leadership
28
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-2828
Organizational Structure
Three Organizational Structures
Simple
Functional
Multi-Divisional
Cost Leadership
29
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-2929
An organization in which one person, or perhapsa small partnership, performs all business functions is using a simple organizational
structure. A small family-owned (mom and pop) grocery store is a good example. One or two people
handle all the necessary business functions. One or two people can handle the purchasing, merchandising, bookkeeping, financing,
marketing, etc.
Simple Structure
Organizational Structure
Cost Leadership
30
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-3030
Organizational Structure
Functional Structure (U-Form: Unitary)
• divides management responsibilities by function
• marketing
• finance
• accounting
• procurement
• production
• R&D
• HR
• logistics
• etc.
• CEO is the only executive with enterprise-wideperspective
• CEO is responsible for strategy & coordinationof functions
Cost Leadership
31
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-3131
Production
Finance
R&D
Accounting MarketingHuman
Resources
Chief Executive Officer
Functional Structure
Organizational Structure
Cost Leadership
32
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-3232
Organizational Structure
Multi-Divisional Structure (M-Form)
• functions are replicated in each division as appropriate
• this structure makes sense when the firm is involvedin more than one business or has grown large enoughto justify geographic divisions
• CEO has strategic responsibility with the help ofvice presidents, etc.—information is filtered through layers
• CEO balances coordination & competition amongdivisions
Cost Leadership
33
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-3333
Organizational Structure
Multi-Divisional Structure (M-Form)
Strategic Planning
Corporate Finance
Corporate R&D
Corporate Marketing
ProductionFinance R&D Accounting
Human Resources
Division Division Division
Marketing
Chief Executive Officer
CorporateHuman
Resources
Cost Leadership
34
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-3434
Organizational Structure
The Functional Structure and Cost Leadership
• specialization within functions facilitates cost reduction
• CEO can use this structure to:
• ensure best cost reduction practices are shared among divisions
• allow and encourage decision-making by thosewho are in the best positions to do so—thoseclose to decisions
• ensure that functions are coordinating efforts inpursuit of a common strategy
Cost Leadership
35
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-3535
Organizational Controls
Policies intended to influence behavior by aligningthe interests of the individual with the interests ofthe organization
Management ControlsFormal Informal
• culture• budgeting policies
• credit policies
• spending policies
• travel policies
• purchasing policies
• attitudes
• leadership styles
Cost Leadership
36
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-3636
Organizational Controls
Compensation Policies
• stock options
• bonuses based on:
• cost reduction
• financial performance
• non-monetary awards• vacations
• parking places
Compensation Policies Should Reinforce Formal and Informal Management Controls
• office decor
Cost Leadership
37
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-3737
Organizational Controls
Organizational Controls and Cost Leadership
• management controls and compensationpolicies can be focused on cost reduction
• supply contracts that stipulate cost reductionsover time
• tight credit policies
• austere travel policies (e.g., no first class)
• bonuses tied to cost reduction targets
Example: Wal-Mart & Southwest Airlines
Cost Leadership
38
Cost LeadershipCost Leadership
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall. 4-4-3838
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the
United States of America.
Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall