Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings

13
Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings Ilesh V. Jani Instituto Nacional de Saúde Maputo, Mozambique

description

Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings. Ilesh V. Jani Instituto Nacional de Saúde Maputo, Mozambique. Nurses in Primary Health Clinics Can Accurately Perform CD4 counts Using Point-Of-Care Devices. Alere PIMA (Lab Techs) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings

Page 1: Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings

Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in

Resource-Limited SettingsIlesh V. Jani

Instituto Nacional de SaúdeMaputo, Mozambique

Page 2: Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings

Alere PIMA (Lab Techs) vs. BD FACSCalibur

Alere PIMA (Nurses) vs. BD FACSCalibur

Limits of Agreement -314 to +257 Limits of Agreement -249 to +148

Jani et al. (2011); AIDS

Nurses in Primary Health Clinics Can Accurately Perform CD4 counts Using Point-Of-Care Devices

Page 3: Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings

Baselin

e _x000d_(N

ov 2009)

Post-Pilo

t _x0

00d_(Mar 2

010)0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

55.2%

92.9%

44.8%

7.1%

Access to CD4 No Access to CD4

Percent Of Patients Receiving CD4 Test Results

Baselin

e _x000d_(N

ov 2009)

Post-Pilo

t _x0

00d_(Mar 2

010)0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

28.4%

79.4%

71.6%

20.6%

Return After CD4 No Return After CD4

Percent Of Patients ReturningAfter Initial CD4

Point-Of-Care CD4 Counting Reduces Pre-Treatment Loss-To-Follow-Up

Page 4: Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings

Conventional CD4 (BD FACSCount)• Higher throughput (50-75

tests/day)• Large installed base (>1000

instruments across Africa)• Takes advantage of existing

infrastructure• Performed by trained

laboratory technicians• May be more efficient and

cheaper due to economies of scale

Point-Of-Care CD4 (Alere Pima)• Lower throughput (5-20

tests/day)• New technology without

large installed base• Does not require significant

infrastructure• Performed by non-

specialised personnel• May be more expensive in

certain settings• Significant patient benefits

Point-Of-Care Technologies Must Be Considered Against Conventional Laboratory-Based technologies

Page 5: Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings

Methods

• Data were gathered from health facilities across 13 countries in sub-Saharan Africa:

• Reagent, control, and consumable costs• Equipment and maintenance costs• Lab infrastructure and overhead costs• Sample transport costs• Human resource salaries• Site patient volumes

• Total cost per test for a site with known testing volume was calculated to determine if it would be less costly to refer samples to an existing CD4 laboratory or to implement Point-Of-Care CD4 testing on-site

Cost is an Important Factor to Consider When Placing Point-Of-Care Devices

Page 6: Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings

Conventional CD4 testing Costs Vary Significantly But Point-Of-Care CD4 Counting Costs Are Relatively Stable Across Countries

Cost Component Price Range Price Range

Reagents $4.22 - $10.89 $5.95 plus distributor margin

Other Consumables $0.55 - $1.61 $1.00Controls $0.15 - $0.52 $100 per yearPrice per Instrument $27,000 (FACSCount) $5,000 (PIMA)Maintenance $4,000 per year $1,200 per yearFreight 10% of costs 10% of costsLab Overhead $0.18 - $0.46 $0.52 - $0.60Sample Transport ~$1.25 per sample1 NoneHuman Resources $0.32 - $2.10 $0.16 - $1.15

Source: 1Machinga District, Malawi

Page 7: Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings

Conventional CD4 POC CD4$0.00

$2.00

$4.00

$6.00

$8.00

$10.00

$12.00

$14.00

$5.60 $6.55

$1.09$1.30$0.70

$1.95$1.25

$0.88 $0.81

$10.50

$11.78

Human ResourcesSample TransportationLab OverheadFreightEquipmentControlsConsumablesReagents

At Average Volumes of ~1,400 Tests/Yr Point-Of-Care CD4 Cost/Test is Comparable to Conventional CD4

Averages obscure higher reagent prices for laboratory based CD4 in some countries

Page 8: Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000$8.00$9.00

$10.00$11.00$12.00$13.00$14.00$15.00$16.00$17.00$18.00

Conventional CD4

CD4

Cost

per

Test

CD4 Volume per Year per Site

For a Single ART Site Referring Samples, Conventional CD4 Cost/Test Drops Slightly as Volumes Rise

Page 9: Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000$8.00$9.00

$10.00$11.00$12.00$13.00$14.00$15.00$16.00$17.00$18.00 Point Of Care CD4

CD4

Cost

per

Test

CD4 Volume per Year per Site

For a Single ART Site with Point-Of-Care CD4, Cost/Test Drops Dramatically as Volumes Rise

Above 5,000 tests/year, a 2nd

device is required

Page 10: Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000$8.00$9.00

$10.00$11.00$12.00$13.00$14.00$15.00$16.00$17.00$18.00

Conventional CD4 Point Of Care CD4

CD4

Cost

per

Test

CD4 Volume per Year per Site

At 1,400 tests/yr per site (avg. CD4 demand at a health center in Africa),

POC all-in costs are higher

Cost is equal at ~2,900 tests per year at one site

As Testing Volumes Rise, Point-Of-Care CD4 Testing Becomes More Cost-Competitive

Page 11: Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings

0 13 26 39 52 65 78 91 1041171301431561691821950

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

Sites in Mozambique without CD4 On-Site,by CD4 Test Demand

CD4 Tests Demanded/Year

Higher Volume Sites Comprise a Large Proportion of Point-Of-Care Test Demand

Sites above >2,900 tests per year comprise >90% of

CD4 test demand But it is more intuitive that POC would belong at

small, remote sites!

Page 12: Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings

Deploying Device Based Point-Of-Care CD4 at a (relatively) Modest Number of Higher Volume Sites Seems to Be Less Costly - But Site Selection Depends on Many Factors

• Other factors to consider:– Universal access– Equity – Distance to laboratories– Patient loss-to-follow-up– Size of catchment area– ART coverage– HIV prevalence– PMTCT services– Etc.

Page 13: Cost Comparison of Point-Of-Care and Conventional CD4 Testing in Resource-Limited Settings

Kanimambo!Obrigado!

Grazie!Thank You!