COST C26 Urban Habitat Constructions under Catastrophic … · 2011-01-11 · WG2 Earthquake...
Transcript of COST C26 Urban Habitat Constructions under Catastrophic … · 2011-01-11 · WG2 Earthquake...
COST C26
Urban Habitat Constructions under Catastrophic Events
WG2 Earthquake Resistance
Innovative seismic protection technologies
and case studies
General Report by:
Michael Kaliske
Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
Alberto Mandara
Second University of Naples – Italy
Need for high performance under seismic action;
Necessity to comply with severe regulations; Optimisation of the structural behaviour; Improvement of the structural response
under exceptional (catastrophic) loading conditions (increase of the structural robustness).
BASIS OF THE USE OF “SPECIAL” SOLUTIONS IN SEISMIC DESIGN
Earthquake of exceptional intensity; Earthquake occurring in a no-seismic area; Earthquake striking a building designed
without complying with seismic regulation; Earthquake striking a degraded/damaged
building; Earthquake striking a historical or
monumental building; …….. …….. any other unpredictable event.
WHAT MEANS “CATASTROPHIC SEISMIC EVENTS”?
Lightness; Reliability; Ease of monitoring, inspection and maintenance; No-added stiffness; Ease of substitution; Reversibility;
MAIN REQUISITES OF THE PROTECTION SYSTEM
These features involve advanced strategies to be followed, consisting of:
1. Use of innovative materials;2. Use of seismic control techniques.
Main Topics faced within Cost C26 WG2 “Earthquake Resistance”
1. INNOVATIVE MATERIALS;2. STRENGTHENING SYSTEMS;3. PROTECTION STRATEGIES;4. CASE STUDIES.
Basic purposes: Use of materials with special properties in order to
meet special design requirements and achieve the best performance;
Creation of light structural elements, in order to optimize the dynamic behaviour;
Exploitation of material features in the most convenient and effective way (exploitation of the 4th dimension);
Creation of special devices for the reduction of the seismic structural response;
INNOVATIVE MATERIALS
Innovative materials Special Metal Materials; Fibre Reinforced Polymers (FRP);
Material: Stainless steel Aluminium alloys Titanium alloys Shape memory alloys
INNOVATIVE METAL MATERIALS
Features: High strength-to-weight ratio Good ductility Product availability Ease of installation Low maintenance cost Reversibility
PURE ALUMINIUM SHEAR PANEL
CONFIGURATION TYPE F
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
-0.1 -0.08 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06
shear strain (mm/mm)sh
ear
str
es
s (
MP
a)
meccanismo 'pure shear'meccanismo 'tension field'
meccanismo 'pure shear'meccanismo 'tension field'
ALUMINIUM SHEAR PANELS
ELONGATION -TENSILE LOAD CURVE
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
ELONGATION (mm)
LO
AD
( D
aN
=kg
)
NOT HEAT-TREATED SPECIMEN
HEAT-TREATED SPECIMEN
Material: Carbon fibre polymers Glass fibre polymers Aramidic fibre polymers
INNOVATIVE FIBRE-REINFORCED MATERIALS
Features: Very high strength and stiffness Wide range of mechanical properties No added weight Product availability Ease of installation No maintenance cost
Strengthening of earthquake damaged structures by means of textile reinforced concrete
J.-U. Sickert, M. Kaliske, W. Graf
Technische Universität Dresden
TRC layer on a hyper parabolic shell
Cylinder shell to be strengthened
WG2 - INNOVATIVE MATERIALS
Seismic upgrading of RC buildings by advanced techniques.
The ILVA-IDEM research project (2006)
Mazzolani, F.M. (Co-ord. and Ed.)
Seismic Upgrading of RC buildings by FRP: full scale tests of a real structure (2006)
Della Corte, G., Barecchia E., Mazzolani, F.M.
University Federico II Naples – Italy
WG2 - INNOVATIVE MATERIALS
Thin fibre-reinforced concrete jackets for im-proving the seismic response of reinforced concrete members: experimental and numerical results (2008).
Georgiadi-Stefanidi, K., Mistakidis, E., Perdikaris, P.C.
University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece.
WG2 - INNOVATIVE MATERIALS
Strengthening of masonry walls by innovative metal based techniques (2007)
A. Dogariu, A. Stratan, D. Dubina, T. Nagy-Gyorgy, C. Daescu & V. Stoian
Performance of masonry shear walls strengthened with steel and aluminum sheething (2008)
A. Dogariu, D. Dubina
Politehnica University of Timisoara, Romania
Retrofitting techniques
Weak area on masonry façade and location of metal sheeting (MP)
Steel wire mesh (SWM) geometry
WG2 - INNOVATIVE MATERIALS
Seismic upgrading of RC buildings by advanced techniques.
The ILVA-IDEM research project (2006)
Mazzolani, F.M. (Co-ord. and Ed.)
Response of Buckling Restrained Braces to Catastrophic Seismic Events (2008)
D’Aniello M., Della Corte G., Mazzolani F. M.
University Federico II Naples – Italy
WG2 – STRENGTHENING SYSTEMS
Performance based evaluation of a non-seismic RC frame strengtened with buckling restrained braces
S. Bordea, A. Stratan, D. Dubina
Politehnica University of Timisoara, Romania
Types of analysed frames
BRB systremFrame geometry and
characteristic beam and column cross-sections
WG2 – STRENGTHENING SYSTEMS
BRB behaviour model
Effect of confinement by FRP on the moment-curvature
relationship
Plastic hinges with inelastic deformations larger than the ULS capacity; Fundamental period of vibration and target displacements
Removable Bolted Links For Eccentrically Braced Frames
A. Stratan, D. Dubina
Politehnica University of Timisoara, Romania
The bolted link concept
Simplified model of a generalized dual system
WG2 – STRENGTHENING SYSTEMS
Experimental tests on seismic upgrading techniques for RC buildings (2007)
F. M. Mazzolani, G. Della Corte, E. Barecchia & M. D’Aniello
University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
Test n. 1
WG2 – STRENGTHENING SYSTEMS
Shear panels for seismic upgrading of new and existing structures (2007)
F. M. Mazzolani, G. De Matteis, S. Panico, A. Formisano, G. Brando
University of Chieti/Pescara G. d’Annunzio, Pescara, University Federico II Naples – Italy
b) c)
WG2 – STRENGTHENING SYSTEMS
• Increase of the structural damping, in order to reduce the structural response under seismic action;
• Reduction of the seismic input energy, in order to prevent structural damage;
• Reduction of the inertia forces, in order to reduce the structural response at a given frequency of the dynamic excitation;
BASIC PURPOSES OF SEISMIC CONTROL TECHNIQUES
WG2 – PROTECTION STRATEGIES
Seismic protection of new and existing buildings using an innovative isolation system (2008)
A. Michalopoulos, T. Nikolaidis, C. Baniotopoulos
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Motion of a steel sphere between two horizontal steel plates under axial
compression load P
A schematic part of the innovative spherical in-plane steel rolling
bearing
The positioning of the aseismic isolation system Cylindrical aseismic isolation system
WG2 – PROTECTION STRATEGIES
SMART TECHNOLOGIES IN THE SEISMIC PROTECTION OF EXISTING BUILDINGS (2008)
A. Mandara, F. Ramundo, G. Spina
Second University of Naples
Representation of SMART system effect
Scheme of Variable Orifice Damper and Electro-Rheological Damper with by-pass
Scheme of a Magneto-Rheological Damper (a) and details of the MR devices developed at the Second
University of Naples (b,c,d).
WG2 – PROTECTION STRATEGIES
Seismic protection of buildings using innovative isolators based on magnetically
controlled elastomer (2008)
T. Isaković, M. Fischinger
University of Ljubljana, FGG, Slovenia
Prototype and scheme of the new MCE device A model of the Augusta Hospital and properties of the HDRB, used to isolate the structure
Storey spectra (accelerations of the equipment ) of the mock-up for different earthquake intensities
Mass acceleration of the SDOF structure isolated with HDRB with
different degree of nonlinearity and with MCE isolator
Experimental vs simulation results
WG2 – PROTECTION STRATEGIES
Verification of effectivenes of seismic protection
and retrofit techniques by experimental testing (2008)
L.Krstevska, Lj.Taskov
Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology,
Skopje, fyRepublic of Macedonia
The experimental verification can be performed on site and/or in laboratory conditionsusing the following testing methods:
• full scale testing
• quasi-static testing
• testing of models in reduced scale on shaking table
• material testing (prototype and model materials)
Locananda Pagoda- BurmaFossanova Abbey-Italy Finland Embassy- Alger
President Palace- Baku
WG2 – CASE STUDIES
Phase 1 - Damage to the minaret (horizontal crack) and
of the mosque.
Phase 2 - Repaired model and strengthened minaret after phase 1.
Phase 3 - Damage of the strengthened model
MUSTAFA PASHA MOSQUE – SKOPJE
(FP6 – PROHITECH)
The FE model of the Mosque
Distribution of first principal plastic strains on the original model at collapse load.
Distribution of first principal plastic strains on the reinforced model at collapse load.
Comparison between experimental and numerical response for the original and
strengthened Minaret model.
Comparison between experimental response for the original and strengthened Minaret model.
pianta piano terra Quota (+1.02)
PROSPETTO NORD
scala 1 : 350
Retrofit of high-rise masonry buildings
A. Mandara et al.
Second University of Naples
CATHEDRAL BELL TOWER – AVERSA
VIBRATION MODES
isolation plane
Smart device
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Dis
pla
ce
me
nt
[cm
]
No control
Passive
Semi-Active Clipped opt Proposal of application
of Smart Systems
WG2 – CASE STUDIES
ACTIVE STRUCTURAL CONTROL – COMPARATIVE NUMERICAL ANALYSIS
El CentroCalitriKobeTaiwan earthquake
Unconnected mass
Connected mass
Passive control
Semi-active control
Active control
Fg1(t)
K1
C1
M1
s1(t)
s2(t)
U
M2
C2
K2 Fg2(t)
WG2 – CASE STUDIES
The ILVA-IDEM Project - Full scale test on R.C. Building
F.M. Mazzolani et al.
University of Naples Federico II WG2 – CASE STUDIES
-2000
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
-0.031 -0.021 -0.011 -0.001 0.009 0.019 0.029 0.039 0.049
Drift angle (rad)
Ba
se S
he
ar
(kN
)
Average 1st floor
The ILVA-IDEM Project - Full scale test on R.C. Building
F.M. Mazzolani et al.
University of Naples Federico IIWG2 – CASE STUDIES
CONCLUSIVE REMARKS
Materials and technologies available today represent an effective tool against any potential risk related to catastrophic seismic events;
The outlined solutions can be effectively tailored to the design of both new buildings and retrofit operations;
Innovative solutions in principle allow to provide the structure with a given predetermined safety level corresponding to any design requirement;
A new design approach based on structural robustness should be set out based on the use of advanced seismic protection techniques;
The standard PB Design procedure should be enhanced in order to account for robustness levels.