Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf ·...
Transcript of Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf ·...
![Page 1: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Primordial non-Gaussianity from inflation
David Wands
Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation
University of Portsmouth
work with Chris Byrnes, Jon Emery, Christian Fidler, Gianmassimo Tasinato, Kazuya Koyama, David Langlois, David
Lyth, Misao Sasaki, Jussi Valiviita, Filippo Vernizzi…
review: Classical & Quantum Gravity 27, 124002 (2010) arXiv:1004.0818
Cosmo-12, Beijing 13th September 2012
![Page 2: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
WMAP7 standard model of primordial cosmology Komatsu et al 2011
![Page 3: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Gaussian random field, (x)
• normal distribution of values in real space, Prob[(x)]
• defined entirely by power spectrum in Fourier space
• bispectrum and (connected) higher-order correlations vanish
David Wands 3
'2 33
'kkkP
kk
0'''
kkk
2
2
2exp
2
1Prob
![Page 4: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
non-Gaussian random field, (x)
anything else
David Wands 4
![Page 5: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Rocky Kolb
5
non-Rocky Kolb
![Page 6: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Primordial Gaussianity from inflation • Quantum fluctuations from inflation
– ground state of simple harmonic oscillator
– almost free field in almost de Sitter space
– almost scale-invariant and almost Gaussian
• Power spectra probe background dynamics (H, , ...)
– but, many different models, can produce similar power spectra
• Higher-order correlations can distinguish different models
– non-Gaussianity non-linearity interactions = physics+gravity
David Wands 6 Wikipedia: AllenMcC
4
21
33,2
21
n
kk kkPkkkP
321
3
321
3,,2
321kkkkkkBkkk
![Page 7: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Many sources of non-Gaussianity Initial vacuum Excited state
Sub-Hubble evolution Higher-derivative interactions e.g. k-inflation, DBI, Galileons
Hubble-exit Features in potential
Super-Hubble evolution Self-interactions + gravity
End of inflation Tachyonic instability
(p)Reheating Modulated (p)reheating
After inflation Curvaton decay
Magnetic fields
Primary anisotropies
Last-scattering
Secondary anisotropies
ISW/lensing + foregrounds
David Wands 7
primordial non-Gaussianity
infl
ati
on
![Page 8: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Many shapes for primordial bispectra
• local type (Komatsu&Spergel 2001)
– local in real space
– max for squeezed triangles: k<<k’,k’’
• equilateral type (Creminelli et al 2005)
– peaks for k1~k2~k3
• orthogonal type (Senatore et al 2009)
– independent of local + equilateral shapes
• separable basis (Ferguson et al 2008) David Wands 8
3
1
3
3
3
3
3
2
3
2
3
1
321
111,,
kkkkkkkkkB
3
3
3
2
3
1
213132321321
3,,
kkk
kkkkkkkkkkkkB
3
321321
321
81,,
kkkkkkkkkB
![Page 9: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Primordial density perturbations from quantum field fluctuations
(x,ti ) during inflation field perturbations on initial spatially-flat hypersurface
= curvature perturbation on uniform-density hypersurface in radiation-dominated era
final
initialdtHN
...)(),(
x
NNtxN I
I I
i
on large scales, neglect spatial gradients, solve as “separate universes”
Starobinsky 85; Salopek & Bond 90; Sasaki & Stewart 96; Lyth & Rodriguez 05; Langlois & Vernizzi...
t
x
![Page 10: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
order by order at Hubble exit
...2
1
...2
1
...2
1
,
11
2
21
21
21
JI
JI
II
I
I I
I
I I
III
NNN
sub-Hubble field interactions super-Hubble classical evolution
N’’
N’
N’
N’ N’
N’
Byrnes, Koyama, Sasaki & DW (arXiv:0705.4096)
e.g., <3>
![Page 11: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
non-Gaussianity from inflation? • single-field slow-roll inflaton
– during conventional slow-roll inflation
– adiabatic perturbations
=> constant on large scales => more generally:
• sub-Hubble interactions – e.g. DBI inflation, Galileon fields...
• super-Hubble evolution – non-adiabatic perturbations during multi-field inflation
=> constant • see talks this afternoon by Emery & Kidani
– at/after end of inflation (curvaton, modulated reheating, etc)
• e.g., curvaton
12
ON
Nflocal
NL
21
s
equil
NLc
f
1 nflocal
NL
...42 L
decay
local
NLf,
1
Maldacena 2002
Creminelli & Zaldarriaga 2004
Cheung et al 2008
![Page 12: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields
– Chen & Wang (2010+12)
– Tolley & Wyman (2010)
– Cremonini, Lalak & Turzynski (2011)
– Baumann & Green (2011)
– Pi & Shi (2012)
– Achucarro et al (2010-12); Gao, Langlois & Mizuno (2012)
• integrate out heavy modes coupled to inflaton, M>>H
• effective single-field model with reduced sound speed
• effectively single-field so long as
• c.f. effective field theory of inflation: Cheung et al (2008)
• see talk by Gao this afternoon
• multiple light fields, M<<H fNLlocal
222
2
2 14 s
equil
NL
eff
eff
sc
fM
Mc
effM
![Page 13: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
( ) is local function of single Gaussian random field, (x)
where
• odd factors of 3/5 because (Komatsu & Spergel, 2001, used) 1 (3/5)1
simplest local form of non-Gaussianity applies to many inflation models including curvaton, modulated reheating, etc
...)()()()(5
3
...)()()(2
1)()()(
...)()()()(
...)(2
1)()(
3132
3
2
21
2
321
21
2
21
2
xxxxf
xxxNNxxx
xxNxx
xNxNx
NL
N’’
N’
N’
![Page 14: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
gNL
NL
Local trispectrum has 2 terms at tree-level
• can distinguish by different momentum dependence
• Suyama-Yamaguchi consistency relation: NL = (6fNL/5)2
– generalised to include loops: < T P > = < B2 > Tasinato, Byrnes, Nurmi & DW (2012) see talk by Tasinato this afternoon
David Wands 14
N’’ N’’ N’’’
N’ N’ N’ N’
N’
...)(6
1)(
2
1)()(
22 xNxNxNx
![Page 15: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Liguori, Matarrese and Moscardini (2003)
Newtonian potential a Gaussian random field (x) = G(x)
![Page 16: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Liguori, Matarrese and Moscardini (2003)
fNL=+3000
Newtonian potential a local function of Gaussian random field (x) = G(x) + fNL ( G
2(x) - <G2> )
T/T -/3, so positive fNL more cold spots in CMB
![Page 17: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Liguori, Matarrese and Moscardini (2003)
fNL=-3000
Newtonian potential a local function of Gaussian random field (x) = G(x) + fNL ( G
2(x) - <G2> )
T/T -/3, so negative fNL more hot spots in CMB
![Page 18: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Constraints on local non-Gaussianity
• WMAP CMB constraints using estimators based on matched templates:
-10 < fNL < 74 (95% CL) Komatsu et al WMAP7
-5.6 < gNL / 105 < 8.6 Ferguson et al; Smidt et al 2010
![Page 19: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Newtonian potential a local function of Gaussian random field (x) = G(x) + fNL ( G
2(x) - <G2> )
Large-scale modulation of small-scale power
split Gaussian field into long (L) and short (s) wavelengths G (X+x) = L(X) + s(x) two-point function on small scales for given L < (x1) (x2) >L = (1+4 fNL L ) < s (x1) s (x2) > +... X1 X2 i.e., inhomogeneous modulation of small-scale power
P ( k , X ) -> [ 1 + 4 fNL L(X) ] Ps(k) but fNL <100 so any effect must be small
![Page 20: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Inhomogeneous non-Gaussianity? Byrnes, Nurmi, Tasinato & DW
(x) = G(x) + fNL ( G
2(x) - <G2> ) + gNL G
3(x) + ... split Gaussian field into long (L) and short (s) wavelengths G (X+x) = L(X) + s(x) three-point function on small scales for given L < (x1) (x2) (x3) >X = [ fNL +3gNL L (X)] < s (x1) s (x2) s
2 (x3) > + ...
X1 X2 local modulation of bispectrum could be significant < fNL
2 (X) > fNL2 +10-8 gNL
2 e.g., fNL 10 but gNL 106
![Page 21: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Local density of galaxies determined by number of peaks in density field above threshold => leads to galaxy bias: b = g/ m Poisson equation relates primordial density to Newtonian potential 2 = 4 G => L = (3/2) ( aH / k L )
2 L so local (x) non-local form for primordial density field (x) from + inhomogeneous modulation of small-scale power ( X ) = [ 1 + 6 fNL ( aH / k ) 2 L ( X ) ] s strongly scale-dependent bias on large scales Dalal et al, arXiv:0710.4560
peak – background split for galaxy bias BBKS’87
![Page 22: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Constraints on local non-Gaussianity
• WMAP CMB constraints using estimators based on optimal templates:
-10 < fNL < 74 (95% CL) Komatsu et al WMAP7
-5.6 < gNL / 105 < 8.6 Ferguson et al; Smidt et al 2010
• LSS constraints from galaxy power spectrum on large scales:
-29 < fNL < 70 (95% CL) Slosar et al 2008 [SDSS]
27 < fNL < 117 (95% CL) Xia et al 2010 [NVSS survey of AGNs]
![Page 23: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Tantalising evidence of local fNLlocal?
• Latest SDSS/BOSS data release (Ross et al 2012):
Prob(fNL>0)=99.5% without any correction for systematics
65 < fNL < 405 (at 95% CL) no weighting for stellar density
Prob(fNL>0)=91%
-92 < fNL < 398 allowing for known systematics
Prob(fNL>0)=68%
-168 < fNL < 364 marginalising over unknown systematics
![Page 24: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Beyond fNL?
• Higher-order statistics – trispectrum gNL (Seery & Lidsey; Byrnes, Sasaki & Wands 2006...)
• -7.4 < gNL / 105 < 8.2 (Smidt et al 2010)
– N() gives full probability distribution function (Sasaki, Valiviita & Wands 2007)
• abundance of most massive clusters (e.g., Hoyle et al 2010; LoVerde & Smith 2011)
• Scale-dependent fNL(Byrnes, Nurmi, Tasinato & Wands 2009)
– local function of more than one independent Gaussian field
– non-linear evolution of field during inflation
• -2.5 < nfNL < 2.3 (Smidt et al 2010)
• Planck: |nfNL | < 0.1 for ffNL =50 (Sefusatti et al 2009)
• Non-Gaussian primordial isocurvature perturbations – extend N to isocurvature modes (Kawasaki et al; Langlois, Vernizzi & Wands 2008)
– limits on isocurvature density perturbations (Hikage et al 2008)
![Page 25: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
new era of second-order cosmology • Existing non-Gaussianity templates based on non-linear primordial
perturbations + linear Boltzmann codes (CMBfast, CAMB, etc)
• Second-order general relativistic Boltzmann codes in preparation
• Pitrou (2010): CMBquick in Mathematica: fNL ~ 5?
• Huang & Vernizzi (Paris)
• Fidler, Pettinari et al (Portsmouth)
• Lim et al (Cambridge & London)
templates for secondary non-Gaussianity (inc. lensing)
induced tensor and vector modes from density perturbations
testing interactions at recombination
e.g., gravitational wave production h
![Page 26: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
outlook
ESA Planck satellite next all-sky survey
data early 2013… fNL < 5
+ future LSS constraints...
Euclid satellite: fNL < 3? SKA ??
![Page 27: Cosmo-12, Beijing th 13 September 2012 Primordial non ...wandsd/talks/wands-cosmo12.pdf · multi-field inflation revisited • light inflaton field + massive isocurvature fields –](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050109/5f4728662839dc7411005cae/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Non-Gaussian outlook:
• Great potential for discovery
– detection of primordial non-Gaussianity would kill textbook single-field slow-roll inflation models
– requires multiple fields and/or unconventional physics
• Scope for more theoretical ideas
– infinite variety of non-Gaussianity
– new theoretical models require new optimal (and sub-optimal) estimators
• More data coming
– Planck (early 2013) + large-scale structure surveys
• Non-Gaussianity will be detected
– non-linear physics inevitably generates non-Gaussianity
– need to disentangle primordial and generated non-Gaussianity