CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping...
Transcript of CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping...
![Page 1: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CORRECTION OF THEOCTUPOLE TERM
INTRODUCED BY THEWIGGLER MAGNET
Claudio SanelliMiro Andrea Preger
![Page 2: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Preliminary considerations• Measurements with beam on the wiggler have shown the
presence of an octupole-like term coming from thecombination of a decapole term in the wiggler field with thewiggling trajectory of the beam
• The tune shift as a function of beam position in the wigglerhas been fitted in the machine model with a single octupolarthin lens at the wiggler center and with 5 thin lenses, one ineach pole
• The intensity of the octupole lens, according to the differentmodels, in MAD units is
• 500 m-3 < KMAD < 1000 m-3
![Page 3: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
First attempt:Wiggler end plate modification
![Page 4: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Wiggler 3D simulation
![Page 5: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Longitudinal field profile(3D simulation)
![Page 6: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Longitudinal field profile comparisonwith and without end plate
![Page 7: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Naive approach to endplate profile shaping
• Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g:• (Bc + hx3)*g = const = Bc*g• Assume endplate contribution to the field from magnetic
calculations Bc 0.18 T• Add linear term in the field to avoid excessive reduction of
the gap:• (Bc + kx + hx3 )*g = const = Bc*g• Truncate gap oscillation to constant to avoid excessive
reduction of the gap• Run magnetic calculation to find the real field
![Page 8: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
0.000
0.010
0.020
0.030
0.040
0.050
0.060
0.070
-0.08 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08
halfgap (m) = 0.0036/B(x)B(x) = 0.18 + 4700*(x+0.0125)^3 - 3.2*(x+0.0125)
G=0B=3.2*x
x(m)
halfgap (m)
![Page 9: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
End plate 2D simulation
![Page 10: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Transverse field profile under theend plate – no shaping
![Page 11: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
End plate shaping(2 D simulation)
![Page 12: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Transverse field profile under theend plate
![Page 13: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Field profile modification
![Page 14: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
0.125
0.130
0.135
0.140
-0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03
KMAD
(per endplate) 50 m-3
B(T)
x(m)
Y = M0 + M1*x + ... M8*x 8 + M9*x9
0.13171M0
-0.26269M1
0.095223M2
431.42M3
0.95406R
![Page 15: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
0.125
0.130
0.135
0.140
-0.03 -0.02 -0.01 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03
KMAD
(per endplate) 135 m-3
B(T)
x(m)
Y = M0 + M1*x + ... M8*x 8 + M9*x9
0.13141M0
-0.57437M1
1.8053M2
1259.3M3
-1160.9M4
-4.2274e+05M5
0.99854R
![Page 16: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
1st Attempt: Conclusions
• Bad magnetic field profile
• Insufficient octupole term correction
DISCARDED
![Page 17: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Second attempt:Substitution of the end plate with
PM blocks
![Page 18: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Longitudinal field profile(3 D simulation)
![Page 19: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Longitudinal field profile comparisonwith and without end plate
![Page 20: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
PM Block geometry(2 D simulation)
![Page 21: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Transverse magnetic field profile
![Page 22: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Magnetic field near the beam axis
![Page 23: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
PM Blocks – 3 D geometry
![Page 24: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
PM Blocks – 3 D solution area
![Page 25: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
PM Blocks – 3 D solution
![Page 26: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Transverse magnetic field profile
![Page 27: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Longitudinal magnetic field profile
![Page 28: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
2 D – 3 D comparisonTransverse field profile
![Page 29: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
-0.05 0.00 0.05
2-D KMAD
230 m-3 (per endplate)
B (T)
x (m)
Y = M0 + M1*x + ... M8*x 8 + M9*x9
2.0254e-07M0
-0.12356M1
-0.00010666M2
2343.8M3
1R
![Page 30: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
-0.05 0.00 0.05
3-D KMAD
120 m-3 (per endplate)
B (T)
x (m)
Y = M0 + M1*x + ... M8*x 8 + M9*x9
-7.9512e-18M0
0.52448M1
1.0372e-14M2
1239.5M3
0.9985R
![Page 31: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
2nd Attempt: Conclusions
• Acceptable field quality but very critical withrespect to magnet position and size
• Insufficient octupole term correction
DISCARDED
![Page 32: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Third attempt:
Octupole correction added intoANSALDO Large Sextupole
by means of awired, air cooled, coil
![Page 33: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
•
![Page 34: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
•
![Page 35: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Sextupole 2D simulation
![Page 36: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
L.S. Symmetric Sextupole FieldProfile
![Page 37: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Sextupole + Octupole
![Page 38: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Sextupole + OctupoleIcorr = 600 A-turns
![Page 39: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Sextupole + Octupole correctionBz(x, Icorr)
![Page 40: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
-0.30
-0.25
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
-0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06
Sextupole @ 175A, Octupole @ 600A
KMAD
60 m-3
x (m)
Y = M0 + M1*x + ... M8*x 8 + M9*x9
-0.0013124M0
-0.42625M1
-97.241M2
-111M3
0.9999R
B (T)
![Page 41: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
3rd Attempt: Conclusions
• Reasonably good magnetic field profile
• Insufficient octupole term correction
DISCARDED
![Page 42: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Fourth attempt:
Octupole correction added intoANSALDO Large Sextupole
by means of awater cooled, coil
![Page 43: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
W.C. coil front view
![Page 44: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Sextupole + Octupole2D simulation
![Page 45: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Sextupole + OctupoleIcorr=3296A*t – Field profile
![Page 46: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Sextupole used as OctupoleIcorr = 3296 A*t
![Page 47: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Sextupole as OctupoleMagnetic field profile
![Page 48: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Sextupole as OctupoleMagnetic field profile
![Page 49: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Sextupole as OctupoleKMAD ≈ 330 m-3
![Page 50: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Sextupole as OctupoleNo quadrupole
![Page 51: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Coil data (1st option)• Coil cross section mm*mm 50 * 14
• Conductor: Cu mm*mm 5.6*5.6
• Cooling hole dia. mm 3.6
• Turns per coil 16
• Coils per Sextupole 4
• Maximum current A 206
• Current density A/mm2 10.14
• Magnet voltage V 17.32
• Magnet power W 3568
• Hydr. Circ. per magnet 4
• Water velocity m/s 1.05
• Water flow per magnet m3/s 4.3E-5
• Temperature increase °C 20
• Pressure drop MPa 0.143
![Page 52: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Coil data (2nd option)• Coil cross section mm*mm 44 * 14
• Conductor: Cu mm*mm 5.6*5.6
• Cooling hole dia. mm 3.6
• Turns per coil 14
• Coils per Sextupole 4
• Maximum current A 235.4
• Current density A/mm2 11.58
• Magnet voltage V 18.21
• Magnet power W 4288
• Hydr. Circ. per magnet 4
• Water velocity m/s 1.26
• Water flow per magnet m3/s 5.2E-5
• Temperature increase °C 20
• Pressure drop MPa 0.18
![Page 53: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
However, before going ahead:
• Systematic check of the available spacebetween vacuum chamber-sextupole
• Mechanical coil design (electric terminals,hydraulic spigots, coil supports, etc.)
• Mechanical 3D check to verify coil insertionwithout sextant splitting
• Preliminary industry check
![Page 54: CORRECTION OF THE OCTUPOLE TERM INTRODUCED BY THE … · Naive approach to endplate profile shaping • Assume field inversely proportional to endplate gap g: • (B c + hx3)*g =](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022050412/5f88d153386601153870ecd8/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
4th Attempt: Conclusions
• Good magnetic field profile
• Quadrupole gradient of about 2.3 T/m to be corrected
• Reasonably good technical solution
POSSIBLE SOLUTION