Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

45
Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University

Transcript of Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Page 1: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Corpus linguistics and language teaching

The next nexus?

Doug Biber

Northern Arizona University

Page 2: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Goals of the talk

• Introduce corpus linguistics

• Present case studies illustrating the surprising findings that emerge from corpus-based research

• Discuss the application of corpus research to classroom teaching and materials development

Page 3: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

What is corpus linguistics?

• A research approach for describing language use:

How do speakers and writers actually use the vocabulary and grammar resources available in a language?

Page 4: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

What is a corpus?

• A large, principled collection of ‘natural’ texts stored on computer

• A corpus should ‘represent’ particular language varieties or registers (e.g., conversation or university textbooks)

– Design is important: texts must be sampled from particular target registers

– Size is equally important: Some language features are rare but still have systematic patterns of use

Page 5: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Characteristics of corpus-based analysis (I)

• Relies on computer-assisted techniques– Concordancers (‘KWIC’ displays = ‘Key Word In

Context’)– Computer programs

• Automatic (e.g., grammatical ‘taggers’)• Interactive (to code grammatical variants)

Page 6: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Example of concordance output (from MonoConc)

Page 7: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Characteristics of corpus-based analysis (II)

• Analyses are empirical

• Uses both quantitative and qualitative / interpretive techniques

• Meaningful analyses must be motivated by linguistic research questions (not simply by the availability of a corpus)

Page 8: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

So what is corpus linguistics?• A research approach – A way of thinking

about language– Shines the spot light on language use: registers

and language for specific purposes– Allows investigation of language choice: Why

does a speaker use a particular word or grammatical form rather than alternatives?

– Allows investigation of meaning in context: why synonyms are usually not interchangeable

– Allows investigation of language preference: what forms are rare? What is especially common?

Page 9: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Corpus descriptions capture the complexities of actual use

– Language use is often systematic but complex

– Corpus-based studies can consider the range of relevant factors and the interactions among factors

– Corpus analysis describes the patterns of use, but it cannot directly determine how those findings are relevant for language learning

– That is, corpus analyses provide the basis for informed decisions by teachers – not necessarily the immediate content of our language teaching

Page 10: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Case studies

• Vocabulary

• Grammar

• Lexico-grammar

Page 11: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Corpus-based descriptions of vocabulary:Selected reference works

Learner dictionaries based on corpora:Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English (LDOCE);

Collins COBUILD English Dictionary

Vocabulary textbooks based on corpora:McCarthy and O’Dell; Basic Vocabulary in Use

Thornbury; Natural Grammar

Academic studies of collocation:Sinclair 1991; Partington 1998

Page 12: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Case studies on vocabulary

• Corpus-based dictionaries• Collocation• Semantic prosody

Page 13: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Case studies on vocabulary (1):Corpus-based dictionaries

• The order of meanings reflects use

e.g. LDOCE entry for concerned:Meaning 1: ‘involved in something’ (reach an agreement with all concerned)Meaning 2: ‘worried’(concerned about how little I eat)

• Identifies common words and register differences

Words moderately common in speech (not writing -- LDOCE)flood, hopefully, messy, potato, shave, underneath

Words moderately common in writing (not speech -- LDOCE)focus, glance, moreover, pollution, scope, underlying

Page 14: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Synonyms: large, great, and big

Page 15: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Case studies on vocabulary (2):Collocations

For example:

Large number(s) ‘quantity’scaleproportionamount

versus

Great deal (of) ‘impressive’importancemajority

(see Firth 1957; Sinclair 1991; Partington 1998; Biber, Conrad, Reppen 1998)

Page 16: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Case studies on vocabulary (3): Semantic prosody

Copular verbs that mean ‘become’:

turn black, red, white, pale

come alive, loose, true, unstuck

go crazy, mad, wrong, bad

(Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, 444-445)

(cf. Partington 1998)

Page 17: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Corpus-based studies of grammar

• Demonstrative pronouns: this versus that• Word classes: nouns, verbs, pronouns• Dependent clauses: that-clauses versus

to-clauses

• (From the Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English)

Page 18: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Case studies on grammar (1)

The grammar of individual words: Demonstrative pronouns this versus that

• The traditional description of the difference:

– This refers to a thing near the speaker

– That refers to something that is not near the speaker

Page 19: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

The grammar of individual words (cont.) Demonstrative pronouns that versus this

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

Conversation Academic WR

Fre

qu

ency

per

mil

lio

n w

ord

s

that

this

Page 20: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Demonstrative pronouns that versus this (cont.)

• Examples of that in conversation(vague or situational reference)

That was delicious.

A: I was, I was flat on my back. B: Uh, I can't sleep like that

• Examples of this in academic writing(text deixis)

GAAP requires that a business use the accrual basis. This means that the accountant records revenues as they are earned…

Page 21: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Case studies on grammar (2)

The register distribution of grammatical classes:

Nouns, verbs, personal pronouns

Page 22: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Distribution of nouns, verbs, and pronouns across four registers

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

Conversation ClassroomTeaching

Textbooks Academic Prose

Fre

qu

ency

per

1,0

00 w

ord

s

Nouns

Verbs

Personalpronouns

Page 23: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Case studies on grammar (3)

Syntactic features

Dependent clauses are common in writing but rare in speech:

Contrasting intuitions with actual use

Page 24: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

That-clauses and to-clauses in conversation vs. academic prose

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Conversation Academic prose

Verb + THAT-clause

"Extraposed"THAT-clause

Verb + TO-clause

"Extraposed"TO-clause

Page 25: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

• Verb + that-clause in conversation:I know (that) I told you.

I think (that) we picked it up.

• Extraposed to-clauses in academic prose:It is important to specify the states …

It is difficult to maintain a consistent level…

It is impossible to liquefy a gas …

Page 26: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Corpus-based studies of lexico-grammar

Case studies from the Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English:

– The grammatical ‘patterns’ of individual words: tell and promise

(cf. Hunston and Francis 2000; Thornbury 2004)

– Passive verbs: common and rare

– Common verbs with that-clauses in conversation

Page 27: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Case studies on lexico-grammar (1)

The grammar of words: tell versus promise

• Both verbs have identical valency patterns:– They can occur as monotransitive verbs (with a

direct object) – or as ditransitive verbs (with a direct object and

an indirect object)

Page 28: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Grammatical patterns for tell and promise in newspaper language

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

TELL PROMISE

V + Direct Object

V + Clause

V + IndirectObject + Clause

Page 29: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

• Example of TELL in newspapers – expressing both the addressee AND the content of the message:

Cheney told [Navy Secretary H. Lawrence Garrett] [that he would cancel the $50 billion project] …

• Example of PROMISE in newspapers – expressing only the content of the promise:

The company promised [to donate about $500,000 to the cause] …

Page 30: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Case studies on lexico-grammar (2)

The words of grammar:

Verbs with passive voice

Page 31: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Verbs with passive voice

• Selected verbs that almost always occur with passive voice in academic prose (over 70% of the time):

– Verbs of scientific methodology: be analyzed, be calculated, be collected, be measured, be tested

– Their occurrence is measured in a few parts per million.

– Verbs expressing logical relations and interpretations: be based (on), be associated (with), be attributed (to), be interpreted (as), be regarded (as)

– Their presence must be regarded as especially undesirable.

Page 32: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Verbs with passive voice (2)

• Selected transitive verbs that almost never occur in the passive voice:

agree, guess, have, like, love, quit, reply, try, want, watch, wish, wonder

Page 33: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Case studies on lexico-grammar (3)

Verbs controlling that-clauses versus to-clauses

Page 34: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

That-clauses and to-clauses in conversation vs. academic prose

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

Conversation Academic prose

Verb + THAT-clause

"Extraposed"THAT-clause

Verb + TO-clause

"Extraposed"TO-clause

Page 35: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Verbs that control that-clauses

• Almost 200 verbs attested in the LSWE Corpus (e.g., feel, realize, hear, assume, suggest, ensure, indicate, imply, propose)

• Only 4 verbs are extremely common in conversation:

think, say, know, guess

Page 36: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Verbs controlling that-clauses in conversation

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

THINK SAY KNOW GUESS All otherverbs

Page 37: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Applications of corpus-based research

Page 38: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Language for specific purposes

• Language use is mediated by register

• That is, notions like ‘common’, ‘rare’, and ‘typical’ are usually not meaningful for general English.

• Rather, language features and patterns are typical of particular registers.

• Case study of modal verbs in university registers

Page 39: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Modal verb classes across specialized university registers

0

5

10

15

20

25

Classroomteaching

Classroommanagement

Textbooks Syllabi, etc.

Possibilitymodals

Necessitymodals

Predictionmodals

Page 40: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Why are there so many prediction modals in class management?

These usually serve (indirect) directive functions:

• I'd like you to review your quizzes

• I would encourage you to add this to your stack of materials

• and then assignment six will be due Tuesday

Page 41: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Students using corpora in the classroom

• The student as researcher: Data-driven learning (e.g., article use) (Johns – e.g., 1991, ELR Journal)

• LSP applications: student concordancing based on a specialized corpus (see, e.g., Donley and Reppen 2001, TESOL Journal; Gavioli and Aston 2001)

• Do students benefit? Yes: enhances vocabulary learning and transfer of word knowledge (Cobb 1997, System; 1999, CALL)

Page 42: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

General considerations for curricula, materials development, and lesson

planning

• What language features and grammatical topics to include / exclude

• What vocabulary to include

• Sequencing

• Providing meaningful practice

Page 43: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Using corpus-based materials in the classroom: Issues (1)

• How to adapt corpus-based research findings?

• What kinds of corpus findings are useful for learners?

• How to adapt natural text for classroom use?

• What kinds of gains in proficiency should we expect from corpus-based materials?

Page 44: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Developing corpus-based materials for the classroom: Issues (2)

• How important is frequency / typicality? What about representation of specific target registers?

• Difficulty and learnability of the construction; inter-language sequences – natural order of acquisition.

• To what extent are current practices actually informed by research on acquisition??

• Unreliability of intuitions

Page 45: Corpus linguistics and language teaching The next nexus? Doug Biber Northern Arizona University.

Future research directions

• Need for empirical research on the translation of corpus research findings to classroom materials:

– Overall distribution of grammatical features Issues of inclusion and sequencing

– Collocation and lexico-grammatical patterns Issues of word choice and practice within a lesson

– Discourse factors influencing grammatical variation and choice Presentation and practice within a lesson

• What kinds of gains in proficiency, in response to what kinds of materials?