Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 9-1 Human Resource Management...
-
date post
15-Jan-2016 -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
0
Transcript of Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 9-1 Human Resource Management...
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-1
Human Resource Management 11th EditionChapter 9
DIRECT FINANCIAL COMPENSATION
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-2
HRM in Action: Outrageous Severance Pay?
• Most people do not understand that massive severance payments are not set up by boards of directors when CEOs quit or have been fired
• Payments were negotiated prior to being hired • Securities and Exchange Commission has
adopted far-reaching executive compensation disclosure rules that apply to publicly traded companies
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-3
Outrageous Severance Pay Examples
• Chuck Prince of Citigroup paid $25.6 million • Stanley O’Neal of Merrill paid $48 million • AT&T CEO David Dorman received $29 million
in cash and additional severance. To help cover Dorman’s IRS bill, the board provided $11 million more.
• Brian M. Storms’ departure as Marsh Inc.’s chairman and chief executive officer cost the brokerage firm nearly $20 million.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-4
Compensation: An Overview
• Compensation - Total of all rewards provided employees in return for services
• Direct financial compensation - Pay received in form of wages, salaries, bonuses, and commissions
• Indirect financial compensation (benefits) - All financial rewards not included in direct compensation
• Nonfinancial compensation - Satisfaction person receives from job itself or from psychological and/or physical environment in which person works
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-5
Total Rewards Concept
• Anything that company provides an employee is included in Total Rewards
• Ranges from base pay and benefits to organization’s culture and environment
• Put together to make a coherent and integrated whole
• Idea of a three-legged stool
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-6
Components of Total Compensation Program External EnvironmentInternal Environment
Compensation
Direct
Wages Salaries Commissions Bonuses
Indirect (Benefits)
Legally Required Benefits Social Security Unemployment Compensation Workers’ Compensation Family & Medical Leave
Voluntary Benefits Payment for Time Not Worked Health Care Life Insurance Retirement Plans Disability Protection Employee Stock Option Plans Supplemental Unemployment
Benefits (SUB) Employee ServicesPremium PayCustomized Benefit Plans
The Job
Skill Variety Task Identity Task Significance Autonomy Feedback
Job EnvironmentSound Policies Capable Managers Competent Employees Congenial Coworkers Appropriate Status Symbols Working Conditions
Workplace Flexibility Flextime Compressed Workweek Job Sharing Telecommuting Part-time Work
Financial Nonfinancial
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-7
Equity Theory
• Motivation theory that people assess their performance and attitudes by comparing both their contribution to work and benefits they derive from it to contributions and benefits of comparison others whom they select – and who in reality may or may not be like them
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-8
Equity in Financial Compensation
• Financial equity - Perception of fair pay treatment for employees
• External equity - Employees are paid comparably to workers who perform similar jobs in other firms
• Internal equity - Employees are paid according to relative value of jobs within same organization
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-9
Equity in Financial Compensation (Cont.)
• Employee equity - Individuals performing similar jobs for same firm are paid according to factors unique to employee, such as performance level or seniority
• Team equity - More productive teams are rewarded more than less productive groups
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-10
Primary Determinants of Direct Financial Compensation Organization Compensation Policies Organizational Level Ability to Pay
Labor Market Compensation Surveys Expediency Cost of Living Labor Unions Economy Legislation
Employee Job Performance Skills Competencies Seniority Experience Organization Membership Potential Political Influence Luck
Job
Pricing
Direct Financial Compensation
Job Job Analysis Job Descriptions Job Evaluation
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-11
Organization as a Determinant of Direct Financial Compensation
• Compensation Policies
• Organizational Level
• Ability to Pay
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-12
Compensation Policies
• Pay leaders - Pay higher wages and salaries. Believe that they will be able to attract high-quality, productive employees and thus achieve lower per-unit labor costs
• Market rate, or going rate - Pay what most employers pay for same job
• Pay followers - Pay below market rate because poor financial condition or believe do not require highly capable employees
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-13
Organizational Level
• Upper management often makes decisions to ensure consistency
• Extreme pressure to retain top performers may override desire to maintain consistency in pay structure
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-14
Ability to Pay
Organization’s assessment of ability to pay is important factor in determining pay levels
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-15
Labor Market as Determinant of Direct Financial Compensation
• Potential employees located within geographic area from which employees are recruited
• Pay for same jobs in different labor markets may vary considerably
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-16
Compensation Surveys
• What are other firms paying?
• Geographic area of survey
• Specific firms to contact
• Jobs to include
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-17
Expediency
• Managers in highly technical and specialized areas occasionally need to use nontraditional means to determine what constitutes competitive compensation for scarce talent and niche positions
• Need real-time information
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-18
Cost of Living
• When prices rise over a period of time and pay does not, real pay is actually lowered
• Some firms index pay increases to inflation rate
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-19
Labor Unions
• Mandatory collective bargaining between management and unions as “wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment.”
• Cost-of-living allowance has been disappearing
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-20
The Economy
• Affects financial compensation decisions
• Depressed economy generally increases labor supply
• Cost of living often rises as economy expands
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-21
Compensation Legislation
• Davis-Bacon Act of 1931
• Walsh-Healy Act of 1936
• Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as Amended
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-22
Davis-Bacon Act of 1931
• First national law to deal with minimum wages
• Federal construction contractors with projects over $2000 to pay at least prevailing wages in area
• Secretary of Labor sets prevailing wage at union wage, regardless of what average wage is in affected locality
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-23
Walsh-Healy Act of 1936
• Companies with federal supply contracts exceeding $10,000 pay prevailing wages
• Requires 1½ times regular pay rate for hours over 8 per day or 40 per week
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-24
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as Amended
• Most significant law affecting compensation
• Establishes minimum wage
• Requires overtime pay and record keeping
• Provides standards for child labor
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-25
Exempt and Nonexempt Employees
• Exempt employees - Categorized as executive, administrative, professional employees, and outside salespersons
• Nonexempt employees - Those in jobs not conforming to above definition
• Most employees who earn less than $23,660 will be considered nonexempt no matter what duties are
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-26
Job as Determinant of Direct Financial Compensation
• Job itself a factor, especially in firms that have internal pay equity as primary consideration
• Organizations pay for value they attach to certain duties, responsibilities, and other job-related factors, such as working conditions
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-27
Job Analysis and Job Descriptions
• Before organization can determine relative difficulty or value of jobs, must first define content
• Done by job analysis / job descriptions
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-28
Job Evaluation
• Firm determines relative value of one job in relation to another
• Ranking
• Classification
• Factor comparison
• Point
• Hay guide chart-profile method
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-29
Ranking Method
• Simplest method
• Raters examine description of each job
• Jobs arranged in order according to value
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-30
Classification Method
• Define number of classes or grades to describe group of jobs
• Compare job description with class description
• Class description that most closely agrees with job description determines job classification
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-31
Factor Comparison Method
• 5 universal job factors - Mental requirements, skills, physical requirements, responsibilities, and working conditions
• Need not keep entire job in mind; raters make decisions on separate aspects or factors of job
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-32
Point Method
• Numerical values assigned to specific job components
• Sum of values gives quantitative assessment of job’s relative worth
• Job factors selected according to nature of specific group of jobs
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-33
Procedure for Establishing Point Method of Job Evaluation
Select Job Cluster
Identify Compensable Factors
Determine Degrees and Define Each Compensable Factor
Determine Factor Weights
Determine Factor Point Values
Validate Point System
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-34
A Point Method Example
1. Select Job Cluster - Assume we are going to develop point system for administrative job cluster
2. Identify Compensable Factors - Assume compensable factors identified are education, job knowledge, contacts, complexity of duties, and initiative
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-35
A Point Method Example (Cont.)
3. Determine Degrees and Define Each Compensable Factor - In administrative job cluster, Education, Job Knowledge, and Initiative have been determined to have five degrees; Contacts has four; and Complexity of Duties has three
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-36
A Point Method Example (Cont.)
FACTOR: CONTACTSLevel (Degrees)
PointsIV Usual purposes of contacts are to discuss problems and possible 90
solutions, to secure cooperation or coordination of efforts, and to get agreement and action; more than ordinary tact and persuasiveness required.
III Usual purposes of contacts are to exchange information and settle 66specific problems encountered in course of daily work.
II Contacts may be repetitive but usually are brief with little or no 42continuity.
I Contacts normally extend to persons in immediate work unit only.18
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-37
A Point Method Example (Cont.)
FACTOR: COMPLEXITY OF DUTIES
III Performs work where only general methods are available. Independent 85action and judgment are required regularly to analyze fact, evaluate situations, draw conclusions, make decision, and take or recommend action.
II Performs duties working from standard procedures or generally 51understood methods. Some independent action and judgment are required to decide what to do, determine permissible variations from standard procedures, review facts in situations, and determine action to be taken, within limits prescribed.
I Little or no independent action or judgment. Duties are so standardized 17 and simple as to involve little choice as to how to do them.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-38
A Point Method Example (Cont.)
4. Determine Factor Weights - Assume committee believes education is very important for administrative job cluster and sets weight for education at 35%. Weights of other four factors were determined by committee to be: Job Knowledge - 25 Contacts - 18 Complexity of Duties - 17
Initiative - 5 The percent total is 100%
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-39
A Point Method Example (Cont.)
5. Determine Factor Point Values - Committee determines total number of points for plan. Number may vary, but 500 or 1,000 points may work well. Committee has determined that a 500-point system will work.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-40
Job Evaluation Worksheet (500-Point System)
Degree of Factor
Job Factor Weight 1 2 3 4 5
Education 35% 35 70 105 140 175
Job Knowledge 25% 25 50 75 100 125
Contacts 18% 18 42 66 90
Complexity of Duties 17% 17 51 85
Initiative 5% 5 10 15 20 25
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-41
A Point Method Example (Cont.)
6. Validate Point System - Each committee member should take random sample of jobs within chosen job cluster and calculate weights for each job selected
• Point total for Administrative 2 job is determined to be 239 points
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-42
Job Evaluation Worksheet for Administrative 2 Position
Degree of Factor
Job Factor Weight 1 2 3 4 5
Education 35% 35 70 105 140 175
Job Knowledge 25% 25 50 75 100 125
Contacts 18% 18 42 66 90
Complexity of Duties 17% 17 51 85
Initiative 5% 5 10 15 20 25
Total Job Value 239
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-43
Illustration of Arithmetic and Geometric Progression
Job Factor 1 2 3 4
Experience Required 1 year 3 years 5 years 7 years
Degree of Factor
(-------------------- Arithmetic Progression---------------------)
Degree of Factor
Job Factor 1 2 3 4 Experience Required 1 year 2 years 4 years 8 years (-------------------- Geometric Progression---------------------)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-44
The Hay Guide Chart-Profile Method
• Refined version of point method
• Know-how
• Problem solving
• Accountability
• Additional compensable elements, such as working conditions
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-45
Job Pricing
• Placing dollar value on worth of job • Pay grades - Grouping of similar jobs to
simplify pricing jobs• Wage curve - Fitting of plotted points to
create smooth progression between pay grades
• Pay ranges - Minimum and maximum pay rate with enough variance between to allow for significant pay difference
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-46
Job Pricing (Cont.)
• Broadbanding - Collapses many pay grades into few wide bands to improve effectiveness
• Single rate system - Pay ranges not appropriate for some workplace conditions such as some assembly lines
• Adjusting pay rates - Overpaid and underpaid jobs
Scatter Diagram of Evaluated Jobs Illustrating Wage Curve, Pay Grades, and Pay Ranges
100 200 300 400 500
17.20
$19.80
18.50
15.90
14.60 14.00 13.30 12.90
12.00
Average Pay per Hour (Current Rates or Market Rates)
Wage Curve
Evaluated Points1 2 3 4 5
Pay Grades
1
2
3
4
5
Pay Ranges for Pay Grades
0- 99 1 $12.00 $13.30 $14.60 100-199 2 13.30 14.60 15.90 200-299 3 14.60 15.90 17.20 300-399 4 15.90 17.20 18.50 400-500 5 17.20 18.50 19.80
Evaluated Points Pay Grade Minimum Midpoint MaximumSummary
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-48
Broadbanding
• Technique that collapses many pay grades (salary grades) into few wide bands to improve organizational effectiveness
• Lateral employee development• Develop employee skills and
encourage team focus• Employee attention directed away
from vertical promotional opportunities
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-49
Broadbanding and Its Relationship to Traditional Pay Grades and RangesA
vera
ge H
ourly
Pay
Grade 4
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Job WorthLow High
Band I
Band II
Grade 6
Band III
Grade 5
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-50
Employee as Determinant of Direct Financial Compensation
• Performance - Performance-based Pay• Skills - Skill-based Pay
• Competencies - Competency-based Pay• Seniority
• Experience• Membership in the Organization
• Potential• Political Influence
• Luck
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-51
Performance-Based Pay
• Merit pay - Pay increase given based on level of performance as indicated in appraisal
• Variable Pay - Compensation based on performance
• Bonus - Most common type of variable pay for performance. One-time financial award based on productivity
• Spot bonuses - Relatively small, gifts to employees for outstanding work or effort
• Piecework - Employees paid for each unit they produce
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-52
Skill-Based Pay
Compensates on basis of job-related skills and knowledge
• Employees and departments benefit when employees obtain additional skills
• Appropriate where work tends to be routine and less varied
• Must provide adequate training opportunities or system becomes demotivator
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-53
Competency-Based Pay
• Rewards employees for capabilities they attain
• Competencies include skills but also involve other factors such as motives, values, attitudes, and self-concepts
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-54
Seniority
• Length of time employee has been associated with company, division, department, or job
• Labor unions tend to favor seniority
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-55
Experience
• Regardless of nature of job, very few factors have a more significant impact on performance than experience
• Dot-com world has changed attitude with regard to experience
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-56
Membership in Organization
• Components of individual financial compensation are given to employees regardless of particular job they perform or level of productivity
• Maintains high degree of stability in workforce and recognizes loyalty
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-57
Potential
• Organizations do pay some individuals based on potential
• Many young employees are paid well because of their potential
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-58
Political Influence
• Should not be used to determine financial compensation
• To deny its existence would be unrealistic
• Person's pull or political influence may sway pay and promotion decisions
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-59
Luck
“It certainly helps to be in the right place at the right time.”
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-60
Team-Based Pay
If team is to function effectively, firms should provide reward based on overall team performance
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-61
Company-Wide Pay
• Profit sharing - Distribution of predetermined percentage of firm’s profits to employees
• Gainsharing - Bind employees to firm’s productivity and provide incentive payment based on improved company performance
• Scanlon plan - Reward to employees for savings in labor costs resulting from employees’ suggestions
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-62
Professional Compensation
• Initially compensated for knowledge they bring to organization
• Maturity curves reflect relationship between professional compensation and years of experience
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-63
Sales Representative Compensation
• Straight salary
• Straight commission
• Endless variety of part-salary, part-commission combinations
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-64
Contingent Workers Compensation
• In most cases, contingency workers earn less pay than permanent counterparts
• Far less likely to receive health or retirement benefits
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-65
Trends & Innovations: Are Top Executives Paid Too Much?
• Peter Drucker recommends 20-to-1 salary ratio between senior executives and rank-and-file white-collar workers
• Ratio of chief executives’ compensation to pay of average production worker jumped to 431-to-1
• 90% of investors think executives are overpaid
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-66
Executive Compensation
Critical factor in attracting and retaining best managers
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-67
Determining Executive Compensation
Firms typically prefer to relate salary growth for highest-level managers to overall corporate performance
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-68
Types of Executive Compensation
• Base salary
• Short-term incentives or bonuses
• Stock option plans
• Performance-based pay
• Executive benefits (perks)
• Golden parachutes
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-69
Base Salary
• Factor in determining executive’s standard of living
• Salary provides basis for other forms of compensation; may determine amount of bonuses and certain benefits
• U.S. tax law does not allow companies to deduct more than $1 million of executive’s salary
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-70
Short-Term Incentives or Bonuses
• Payment of bonuses reflects a managerial belief in their incentive value
• 90% of executives receive bonuses
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-71
Stock Option Plans
• Manager options to buy specified amount of stock in future at or below current market price
• Some boards of directors require their top executives to hold some of firm’s stock
• Financial Accounting Standards Boards requires companies to expense stock options, thereby making them not as attractive
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-72
Performance-Based Pay
• Trend toward more performance-based compensation packages for executives
• Shareholders become increasingly disenchanted with high levels of executive compensation - performance-based pay may gain in popularity
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-73
Executive Benefits (Perks)
• Special benefits provided by firm to small group of key executives and designed to give executives something extra
• Conveys status
• Personal use of corporate jet is soaring among corporate America’s elite as executive perk
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-74
Golden Parachutes
• Perquisite that protects executives in event another company acquires firm or executive is forced to leave firm for other reasons
• Attempts to rein in obscene golden parachute plans
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
9-75
A Global Perspective:China’s Compensation Problems
• 25% of Chinese workers had already had 3 or more jobs in their career and 20% expected to leave their positions in next year
• Employees stay with their company less than 2 years
• Employees were more likely to stay if they have good manager, were recognized for their contributions, and had great company leadership
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the
United States of America.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall