Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 Frictions in the Labor Market.

19
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 Frictions in the Labor Market

Transcript of Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 5 Frictions in the Labor Market.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc.

Chapter 5

Frictions in the Labor Market

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 2

FIGURE 2.13 Demand and Supply at the "Market" and "Firm" Level

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 3

Figure 5.1: The Supply of Labor to Firm A: Worker Mobility Costs Increase the Slope

of the Labor Supply Curve Facing Individual Employers

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 4

Table 5.1: Labor Supply Schedule for a Hypothetical Firm Operating in a

Monopsonistic Market

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 5

Figure 5.2: A Graph of the Firm-Level Data in Table 5.1

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 6

Profit Is Maximized For The Monopsonist When:

MRP = ME (marginal expense)

where

ME > Wage

Monopsony

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 7

Figure 5.3: Profit-Maximizing Employment and Wage Levels in a Firm Facing a

Monopsonistic Labor Market

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 8

Figure 5.5: Minimum-Wage Effects under Monopsonistic Conditions: Both Wages and Employment Can Increase in the Short Run

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 9

Quasi-Fixed Labor Costs I

Variable Costs vs. Quasi-Fixed CostsHiring CostsImplicit and Explicit Training CostsNon Wage Benefits

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 10

Table 5.2: Hours Devoted by Firms to Training a New Worker during First Three

Months on Job, 1992

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 11

Table 5.3: Employee Benefits as a Percentage of Total Compensation, 2006

(Average Hourly Cost in Parentheses)

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 12

The Employment/Hours Trade-Off

MP of Labor and MP of HoursME of Labor and ME of HoursOvertime Pay Premium and Employment

When there are quasi-fixed labor costs, production cost Is minimized when:

MEm/MPm = MEh/MPh

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 13

Figure 5.6: The Predicted Relationship between MEM/MEH and Overtime Hours

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 14

Training InvestmentsI

Training investments are quasi-fixed costs that are normally paid for by both the firm and the worker

Increased employee productivity motivates the company to bear the net costs of training, but:

a. training must raise the worker’s productivity more than it increases his/her wageb. the employee must stay with the company until the net cost of training is recovered

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 15

Training InvestmentsI

Assume that:

NEo is net expense in period 0 Wo is the wage during period 0 Z are the training cost in period 0 MRPo is trainee’s contribution in period 0

If: NEo = Wo + Z - MRPo > 0

Then, in the next Period, MRP1 must exceed W1

so that MRPo + MRP1 / (1+r) is greater or equal

Wo + Z + W1 / (1+r)

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 16

I Will the firm offer general training to its employees?

Only if Wo + Z –MPo = 0

Why?

Because after training, other firms will be willing to

offer the employee a wage W1 = MRP1.

But, if Wo + Z –MPo > 0, the training firm

must pay a wage of W1 < MRP1.

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 17

A Two-Period Wage Stream Associated with Specific Training

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 18

Figure 5.7: Productivity and Wage Growth, First Two Years on Job, by Occupation and

Initial Hours of Employer Training

Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. 5- 19

Hiring Costs

The Use of Credentials or Signals

Statistical Discrimination

Internal Labor Markets