Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall 1 Bus 411 Day 14. Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 3 -2 Agenda...
-
Upload
aubrie-evans -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall 1 Bus 411 Day 14. Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall Ch 3 -2 Agenda...
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall 1
Bus 411
Day 14
Copyright 2005 Prentice Hall
Ch 3 -2
Agenda Assignment 5 Due
Mid term Exam Available March 16 Due March 27 20 Short essays @ 5 points each
New Course schedule 2 Oral and 1 Written Case study Pick Groups and cases
Discussion Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Option 2 2 case study presentations @ 7.5% = 15% 1 written case study @ 10% =10%
Ch 8-3Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Mar 20 Strategy Review, Evaluation and Control
Chapter 9
Mar 24 How to Prepare and Present a Case Study
Pages 360-374 in text
Mar 27 Case 1 (Instructor)Mar 31 Group work
Apr 3 Case 2 (Group 1)Apr 7 Case 3 (Group 2)
Apr 10 Case 4 (Instructor)Apr 14 Group work Apr 17 Case 5 (Group 1)
Apr 21 Case 6 (Group 2)Apr 24 Free day
Apr 31 Take home final assigned Written case study due
May 1 Free day to work on take home finalMay 7 @ 8AM
In class portion of Final Exam
May 8 Turn in Take home portion of Final Exam by 3PM
Mid Term Exam (Chapter 1-9) 15%Final Exam (Chaps 1-9 and Cases) 25%Assignments (5 @ 5%) 25%Case Presentations 15%Written Case Study 10%Pre-professional Conduct 10%
100%
Case study assignments First Round - Restaurants
Tony 20. Wendy’s International — 2007
Group 1 21. McDonald’s Corporation — 2007
Group 2 22. Compass Group PLC — 2007
Second Round – Automotive Tony
11. Skoda Auto — 2007 Group 1
9. Ford Motor Company — 2007 Group 2.
10. Winnebago Industries — 2008
Written Case Study Pick one of the remaining 25 cases in the text
List on page xxvii in text E-mail choice by next class
Ch 8-4Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Ch 9-5Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Chapter 9Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Strategic Management: Concepts & Cases
12th Edition
Fred David
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Ch 6 -6
Strategic Management Process Model
Develop Mission and Mission Statements
Chap 2
Measure and Evaluate
PerformanceChap 9
Implement StrategiesManagement Issues
Chap 7
Generate, Evaluate and Select Strageies
Chap 3
Implement StrategiesMarketing, Finance, accounting, R&D,
MIS issuesChap 8
Perfrom External Audit
Chap 3
Establish Long-termObjectives
Chap 4
Perform Internal Audit
Chap 4
Ch 9-7Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
“Organizations are most vulnerable when they are at the peak of their success.”
– R. T. Lenz
Strategy Evaluation
Ch 9-8Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
– Strategies become obsolete
– Internal environments are dynamic
– External environments are dynamic
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Ch 9-9Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Vital to the organization’s well-being Alert management to potential/actual problems
in a timely fashion Erroneous strategic decisions can have severe
negative impact on organizations
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Strategy Evaluation
Ch 9-10Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
1. Examine the underlying bases of a firm’s strategy.
2. Compare expected to actual results.3. Identify corrective actions to ensure that
performance conforms to plans.
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Three Basic Activities
Ch 9-11Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Complex & sensitive undertaking
Overemphasis can be costly & counterproductive
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Strategy Evaluation
Ch 9-12Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Have assets increased? Increase in profitability? Increase in sales? Increase in productivity? Profit margins, ROI, and EPS ratios
increased?
Appraisal of Strategic Performance
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Ch 6 -13
Strategy Evaluation, Review & Control
Consonance
Consistency
Feasibility
Advantage
Rumelt’s4 Criteria
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Ch 6 -14
Strategy Evaluation, Review & Control
Strategy should not present inconsistent goals & policies Issue and not “people” problems Success for one department means failure for another Policy problems rise to the top
Consistency
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Ch 6 -15
Strategy Evaluation, Review & Control
Consonance
Consistency
Feasibility
Advantage
Rumelt’s4 Criteria
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Ch 6 -16
Strategy Evaluation, Review & Control
Need for strategies to examine sets of trends Need a Holistic view (internal and external)
Consonance
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Ch 6 -17
Strategy Evaluation, Review & Control
Consonance
Consistency
Feasibility
Advantage
Rumelt’s4 Criteria
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Ch 6 -18
Strategy Evaluation, Review & Control
Neither overtax resources or create unsolvable sub-problems Can it be done with the given or available
resources?
Feasibility
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Ch 6 -19
Strategy Evaluation, Review & Control
Consonance
Consistency
Feasibility
Advantage
Rumelt’s4 Criteria
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Ch 6 -20
Strategy Evaluation, Review & Control
Creation or maintenance of competitive advantage If it doesn't create a competitive advantage
then what’s the point?
Advantage
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Ch 6 -21
Process of strategic evaluation Management should be continually aware of
progress Management by wandering around
Don't wait for information get to you, go out and get the information
Things Change
Ch 9-22Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
1. Increase in environment’s complexity
2. Difficulty predicting future with accuracy
3. Increasing number of variables
Difficulties in Strategy Evaluation
Ch 9-23Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
4. Rate of obsolescence of plans
5. Domestic and global events
6. Decreasing time span for planning certainty
Difficulties in Strategy Evaluation
Ch 9-24Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Initiate managerial questioning Trigger review of objectives & values Stimulate creativity in generating
alternatives
Strategy Evaluation Should –
Ch 9-25Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Develop revised EFE Matrix
Develop revised IFE Matrix
Review of Underlying Bases of Strategy –
Ch 9-26Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
1. Competitors’ reaction to strategy
2. Competitors’ change in strategy
3. Competitors’ changes in strengths & weaknesses
4. Reasons for competitors’ strategic change
Review Effectiveness of Strategy –
Ch 9-27Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
5. Reasons for competitors’ successful strategies
6. Competitors’ present market positions & profitability
7. Potential for competitor retaliation
8. Potential for cooperation with competitors
Review Effectiveness of Strategy –
Ch 9-28Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Are strengths still strengths? Have we added additional strengths? Are weaknesses still weaknesses? Have we developed other weaknesses?
Monitor Strengths & Weaknesses; Opportunities & Threats
Ch 9-29Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Are opportunities still opportunities? Other opportunities develop? Are threats still threats? Other threats emerged? Are we vulnerable to hostile takeover?
Monitor Strengths & Weaknesses; Opportunities & Threats
Ch 9-30Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy-Evaluation Assessment Matrix
Continue courseYesNoNo
Corrective actions
NoYesNo
Corrective actions
YesYesNo
Corrective actions
NoNoYes
Corrective actions
YesNoYes
Corrective actions
NoYesYes
Corrective actions
YesYesYes
Corrective actions
NoNoNo
Result
Has the firm progressed
satisfactorily toward achieving its stated
objectives?
Have major changes
occurred in the firm’s external strategic position?
Have major changes
occurred in the firm’s internal strategic position?
Ch 9-31Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Ch 9-32Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Compare expected to actual results Investigate deviations from plan Evaluate individual performance Progress toward stated objectives
Measuring Organizational Performance
Ch 9-33Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Financial Ratios Compare performance over different periods Compare performance to competitors’ Compare performance to industry averages
Quantitative Criteria for Strategy Evaluation
Ch 9-34Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Return on investment (ROI) Return on equity (ROE) Profit margin Market share
Key Financial Ratios
Ch 9-35Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Debt to equity Earnings per share (EPS) Sales growth Asset growth
Key Financial Ratios
Ch 9-36Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Internal consistency of strategy Consistency with environment Appropriateness in view of resources
Qualitative Evaluation of Strategy
Ch 9-37Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Acceptable degree of risk Appropriate time frame Workability of the strategy
Qualitative Evaluation of Strategy
Ch 9-38Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
– Evaluate strategies from 4 perspectives:1. Financial performance2. Customer knowledge3. Internal business processes4. Learning & growth
Balanced Scorecard
Ch 9-39Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Copyright 2007 Prentice Hall
Ch 6 -40
Balanced Scorecard
Area of Objectives Measure or Target Time Expectation Primary Responsibility
Customers
1
2
Managers/Employees
1
2
Operations/Processes
1
2
Community/Social Responsibility
1
2
Business Ethics/Natural Environment
1
2
Financial
1
2
Ch 9-41Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Ch 9-42Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Economical Meaningful Generates useful information Timely information Provides accurate picture of events
Characteristics of Strategy Evaluation
Ch 9-43Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Alternative plans that can be put into effect if
certain key events do not occur as expected
Contingency Planning
Ch 9-44Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Financial audits determine correspondence between assertions based on strategic plan & established criteria
Environmental audits ensure sound and safe practices
Auditing
Ch 9-45Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
Strategy Review, Evaluation, and Control
Process is more an “art” than “science” Should strategies be visible or hidden from
stakeholders? Should process be more top-down or
bottom-up?
21st Century Challenges in Strategic Management