Contradictory levels the double functioning element final
-
Upload
elaine-bong -
Category
Education
-
view
100 -
download
1
Transcript of Contradictory levels the double functioning element final
Bachelor of Science (Hon.) (Architecture)
Theories of Architecture & Urbanism
[ARC 3233]
Project 2:
Analyzing & Theorizing Architecture
Name and Student ID:
Elaine Bong Poh Hui || 0310432
Tutor:
Mr. Lam Shen Fei
Contradictory Levels: The Double-Functioning Element
Introduction
In our modern era, our capital the Kuala Lumpur city centre has advanced from its
previous humble roots to a massively developed cityscape where all the financial
and economic sectors are located and business transactions are made endlessly on
a daily basis. This large scale multipurpose development area covering over “Jalan
Ampang”, “Jalan P. Ramlee”, until “Jalan Pinang” stretches an impressive 100 acres
and houses numerous of Malaysia’s most prominent example of architecture.
Amongst those examples exist the G-Tower, a modern monument to Malaysian
architecture, is a mixed development structure compromising of retail spaces, hotel
service apartments, offices and diverse set of other functions. Being strategically
located at the crossroads of “Jalan Tun Razak” and “Jalan Ampang,” this 30 storey
building covers a total land area of 2000m² encompasses a 180 5-star hotel rooms,
112 CEO duplex office and a club designed by “BEP Akitek” under Goldis Tower and
construction was completed in June 2009. The G-Tower was designed will a mostly
glass based façade which relates to the client’s interest towards buildings as Modern
Art Deco designs similar to jewellery (Goldis Berhad, n.d.).
Robert Venturi’s “Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture” shows Venturi’s
ideology - double function - of observing things as individual parts by parts rather
than its complete whole, which he does by linking everything together causing the
end product to be comprehensible. The above mention theory of double functions
also encompasses the concept of double meaning which can most easily be
portrayed by an example of a column that can act both as an art decoration while
simultaneously serving as a structural element.
From that theory, the adaptation of this double functioning element will be identified
within and around the grounds of the G-Tower be it to improve the overall aesthetical
value. The double meaning that will be present exist in having a dominant - an
initially obvious - meaning within a certain layout or design whilst serving a
secondary function that may be less noticeable unless intentionally observed; both
ultimately serves to provide benefits to its intended occupants.
Dual Expression
Upon entering the grounds of the G-Tower, the most noticeable feature-aside from
its grandeur entrance (Figure 1) - would be the vegetation covers along its
supportive column reaching a height almost equivalent to reaching the ceiling. These
column acts as an expression of a more nature inspired design and atmosphere
compared to its dull supportive counterpart. The purpose of implementing the
crawlers that are growing upon the cover around the column (Figure 2) aside from
creating an aesthetic and cooling effect towards oncoming viewers, it also seeks to
create a visual sense of continuation from the plantation that are growing on the
surface directly below the column. These plants also sit upon a sort of pedestal
surrounded by a water body, this base elevates the column above ground level
giving it a very monumental appearance worthy of the entrance of such a building.
This column serves more than just an artistic expression that it appears, but rather
acts a shading element and a separation device between the interior space and the
exterior region of the entrance; shading the interior from the early morning sunlight
and its glare (Figure 3). This illustration of creating a continuous link comes from an
example of Robert Rauchenberg’s “Pilgrim” which he seeks to show how the still life
of a chair was able to make connection with art. The surface pattern from the artwork
continues from its stretcher canvas onto the actual physical chair placed in front of
the canvas, making an ambiguous pattern between a painting and a piece of
furniture, and on another level, the work of art in a room (Venturi, 1966). To link
spaces together, the same medium being the vegetation cover in this case, is used
to create a visual continuity from the façade towards the interior.
Deceiving Appearance
Being known for its eco-friendly nature, the G-Tower have numerous facilities that
serve to conserve, recycle and reuse as is their concept. One such innovative
feature is the fish ponds of the G-Tower; a system that helped them achieve their
certification for being a green building. This system while elaborate follows a certain
order. The rain harvesting system collects rain water which then goes through a
specifically engineered water re-circulation system and then cleaned water is the
used both landscape irrigation as well as for housing the organically raised fish
(Figure 4). Aside from being an efficient method of reducing water consumption, also
provides the fish growing within the pond to be nurtured in a pollution and stress free
environment. The organically grown fish are later retrieved and is checked for
edibility before being brought to the kitchen to be cooking and served for customer’s
consumption (Figure 6). This entire process is an example of Robert Venturi’s
perspective on a deceiving appearance whereby users will be able to enjoy the
entertaining design of having a fish pond without knowing that is merely a
camouflage, a façade. This feature is similar to Mies’ and Johnson’s Seagram
Building that excludes functions other than offices, and by using a similar wall pattern
camouflages the fact that at the top there is a difference kind of space for
mechanical equipment (Venturi, 1966).
Dual Function
After moving to the upper section of the building, the bridge bar (Figure 7), a private
space located on the 28th floor and is available for members only, becomes the most
interesting feature reminiscent of the bridge of the Petronas Twin Towers. It portrays
the concept of dual function whereby it acts not only as a bridge/corridor that
connects the two block of hotel service apartment but simultaneously function as a
room serving an alternative function of being a bar for occupants of the hotel.
Recognition of the reality that in the total fabric of a town each type of building
contains signifiers that denote its identity and function, guiding and reassuring the
citizens as they go about their daily lives (Hearn, 2003). The guests that first visited
the place would not have recognised the bridge as a structural element but just a
room or a corridor that connects two spaces. Venturi (1966) mentions that a room
can have many functions at the same time or different times. Kahn prefers the
gallery because it is both directional yet non-directional, a corridor and a room at
once. Based upon that, the function of the room is based on what it is used for
besides its initial design as a structural element. The bridge bar not only provides a
linear circulation along the middle for guest who merely wish to pass through to the
other side, along with seating areas provided closer to the edges of the bar as the
sides provide a better view of the cityscape no matter the time of day (Figure 10).
Since the position of the bridge bar is atop the highest portion of the building,
occupants within the hotel may come to de-stress and enjoy the fantastic panoramic
views while enjoying a delicious meal of their choice.
As a whole, the theme of the G-Tower being “work, stay, play” under a single hub is
an ideal example of the integration of Venturi’s dual function of architecture in our
time, embodying retail, hotel and office under a single room. Similar to another
instance Venturi (1966) provides involving the P.S.F.S that radiates a positive
expression through its wide range variety and complexity of its programs. The
integration of shops on the first floor and a big bank on the second with offices above
even a special purpose rooms at the peak. While other buildings within the district
may serve a similar business based community to G-Tower, they however don’t
provide any other facilities such as club lounges, function rooms, and an outlet that
serves food and beverages to their business personnel. This integration of a work
and entertainment environment under a single roof suitably exemplifies Venturi’s
views a dual function and dual expression concept, not just a space that serves two
separate functions but rather a space that allows for mutual relationship between
functions for the comfort and enjoyment of the guest.
Conclusion
The ability to focus on individual details, where other would not notice, like Robert
Venturi who with the tendency to create interesting and memorable spaces from his
designs. A common person within our society while being so exposed to information
from the internet are still unable to grasp the actual intention that a certain architects
design may want to portray seeing as they are not involved or concern in anyway
continue with their own personal observations. Whether they know it or not,
architecture has played a major role through the decades and centuries and revolves
around people and architects continues to improve the benefits they can be provided
to our community and future generations to come. Personal observations suggest
that even the most minor of details that are designed may bring life to an otherwise
bleak surrounding and may be beneficial to their users; similar to how the fish in the
pond that may appear to be specifically there for aesthetic reasons can in fact be
retrieved for the enjoyment of the palate. The bridge bar may considered a social
succession as it allows for guests who merely wish to pass through to be exposed to
a new experience, dining on a bridge above with a beautiful view of the city line
below. The extension of the green element from the base onto the column stretching
towards the ceiling of the lobby creates a unique perspective as a symbolism of
minimal numbers of trees within the city, the columns themselves serve two
simultaneous function yet express different intentions. Design is in fact made more
intriguing when we take the time to notice and observe this finer details around us,
as it is based on opinion and interpretation to which every single person has their
own. The building itself acts a haven that seeks to introduce the element of greenery
to the dull cityscape, as was the clients interest with jewellery, the G-Tower stands
today as an actual diamond in the rough. A small sprout growing out from amongst
the concrete jungle.
References
GayaTravel,. (2012). Bridge Bar G-Tower Hotel. Retrieved from
http://www.gayatravel.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Bridge-Bar-01-
1764x700.jpg
Goldis Berhad,. gtower: a sustainable tower. Retrieved 20 June 2015, from
http://www.goldis.com/media/doc/Architecture%20Malaysia%20G%20Tower%20a
%20Sustainable%20Tower.pdf
GTower Hotel,. (2015). GTower Hotel. Retrieved from
http://gtowerhotel.com/home.html
Hearn, F. (2003). Implications of Robert Venturi's theory of architecture. Facta
Universitatis - Series: Architecture And Civil Engineering, 2(5), 357-363.
doi:10.2298/fuace0305357h
MSC Malaysia,. (2012). G-Tower Map. Retrieved from
http://www.mscmalaysia.my/sites/default/files/cybercities/GTower_Map.jpg
Venturi, R. (1966). Complexity and contradiction in architecture (pp. 34-35). New
York: Museum of Modern Art.