Contract Enforcement II
Transcript of Contract Enforcement II
![Page 1: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Intro to Contracts: Contract Enforcement I
Prof. Merges
Jan. 10, 2011
![Page 2: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Agenda
• Logistics
• Overview of course: structure and approach
• Intro to K enforcement
![Page 3: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Logistics
• Office Hours: Thursdays at 2 pm – 438 North Addition
• Slides: bclt course website
• Meeting times, break days, etc.: see syllabus
![Page 4: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Course Overview
• Overall approach: high-level concepts, doctrines, tools
• With an eye toward practical application
– This is the foundational private law course
![Page 5: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
E. Allan Farnsworth
![Page 6: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Contracts and enforcement
• What does it mean for a contract to be enforceable?
• Enforceable by whom?
• How does a party enforce a contract?
![Page 7: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Restatement 2d § 1• A K is –
“a promise or set of promises for the breach of which the law gives a remedy, or the performance of which the law recognizes as a duty . . .”
![Page 8: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
“Private law”
• Contrast with “public law”
• Who makes private law?
![Page 9: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Rest sec. 1
• “Promise for which law gives a remedy” –
• What can you infer from this?
![Page 10: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Rest sec 1 (cont’d)
• OR performance recognized as a duty
What can you infer from this?
![Page 11: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
What does it mean to enforce a contract?
• Hawkins v. McGee
• Bayliner Marine v. Crow
![Page 12: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Hawkins v. McGee
![Page 13: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Hawkins v. McGee
•What is the contract?
![Page 14: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Hawkins
• Who are the parties to the contract?
![Page 15: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Hawkins
• When was the contract written down?
![Page 16: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Rest sec 1
• “A promise for the breach of which the law gives a remedy . . .”
• Was there a promise here?
![Page 17: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Doctor’s statements
• “Three or four days, not over four, then the boy can go home, and [in a few days he] can go to work with a good hand.”
• Legal status?
![Page 18: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Dr.’s statements• “Clearly [these statements] would not
justify a finding that the doctor contracted . . . .”
• “[T]he fact that these estimates were exceeded would impose no contractual liability upon the defendant.”
![Page 19: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
What if?
• The Doctor had said “I promise the boy will be in the hospital three or four days and then can go home and soon get to work”?
![Page 20: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
• “Expressions of opinion or predictions”
• Still true if he promised?
![Page 21: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
What did the Dr. say that implicated a K?
![Page 22: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
What did the Dr. say that implicated a K?
“I will guarantee to make the hand a hundred percent perfect hand or a hundred percent good hand.”
![Page 23: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Were these words alone enough to create a K?
![Page 24: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Were these words alone enough to create a K?
• Can one person’s statement, without more, create a contractual obligation?
• What about the other party here?
![Page 25: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
What was the holding here?
![Page 26: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
What was the holding here?
“The question of the making of the alleged contract was properly submitted to the jury.”
![Page 27: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Language and contextRest. 2d § 2. Promise; Promisor; Promisee; Beneficiary
(1) A promise is a manifestation of intention to act or refrain from acting in a specified way, so made as to justify a promisee in understanding that a commitment has been made.
![Page 28: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Rest. 2d § 2. Promise; Promisor; Promisee; Beneficiary
(2) The person manifesting the intention is the promisor.
(3) The person to whom the manifestation is addressed is the promisee.
![Page 29: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
R2 § 4. How A Promise May Be Made
A promise may be stated in words either oral or written, or may be inferred wholly or partly from conduct.
![Page 30: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Illustrations:1. A telephones to his grocer, “Send me a ten-pound
bag of flour.” The grocer sends it. A has thereby promised to pay the grocer's current price therefor.
2. A, on passing a market, where he has an account, sees a box of apples marked “25 cts. each.” A picks up an apple, holds it up so that a clerk of the establishment sees the act. The clerk nods, and A passes on. A has promised to pay twenty-five cents for the apple.
![Page 31: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Anglin v. Kleeman, 140 N.H. 257, 665 A.2d 747 (Sup Ct N.H.,1995)
Action arising out of unsuccessful knee surgery
Cites Hawkins v. McGee
![Page 32: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
665 A.2d 747, 750In this case, the plaintiff testified he was told
that the “operation could give me a knee that was stronger than ... before,” and that following surgery “if [he] was committed, [he] would be able to play ball again.” The language quoted by the plaintiff does not rise to the level required by Hawkins to allow a finding of a contract or warranty to cure by a physician.
![Page 33: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Hawkins distinguished“Additionally, unlike the doctor in Hawkins,
Dr. Kleeman did not solicit or request that he be allowed to perform the plaintiff's surgery. In fact, the plaintiff testified that Dr. Kleeman had informed him that he could have another surgeon perform the surgery, and the plaintiff did consult another surgeon prior to agreeing to surgery.” – 665 A.2d 747, 750
![Page 34: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Other causes of action?
• Anglin v. Kleeman, 140 N.H. 257, 665 A.2d 747 (Sup Ct N.H.,1995)
![Page 35: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Other causes of action?
• Anglin v. Kleeman
• Negligence (tort)
• “The spongy knee” case
![Page 36: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Bayliner Marine v. Crow
• Parties and procedural history
• Primary issue in the case
![Page 37: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Bayliner
![Page 38: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Facts
• Crow and Atherton
![Page 39: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Atherton
• Who was he exactly?
• What did he say?
![Page 40: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Bayliner documents
![Page 41: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
YEAR MODEL ENGINE OPTIONDRIVE RATIO HIGH ALTITUDE GEAR RATIO PROP SIZE PART N0. WIDE OPEN
THROTTLE RPM1989 160 CB OB 100 hp 2.07:1 13 X 19 55001989 160 BR 3.0L 130hp Merc 1.98:1 13.75 X 21 46001989 160 BR OB 100 hp 2.07:1 13 X 19 55001989 Laguna 17 100hp Merc OB 2.07:1 13.75 X 17 5500
1989 Laguna 17 135hp Merc OB 2.00:1 17 Mirage 5500
1989 180 BR OB 135 hp Merc 2.00:1 17 Mirage SS 5500
![Page 42: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Prop matrix disclaimer
• “This data is intended for comparative purposes only, and is available without reference to weather conditions or other variables. All testing was done at or near sea level, with full fuel and water tanks, and approx. 600 lbs. passenger gear and weight.” – p. 4
![Page 43: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Bayliner brochure
• “The 3486 delivers the kind of performance you need to get to the prime offshore fishing grounds.”
![Page 44: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Other facts: Crow
![Page 45: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Other facts: Crow
• Lots of extra equipment – nav system, radar, icemaker, autopilot, AC/heating unit, etc.
• No test drive prior to delivery
![Page 46: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
The sad truth
• This boat was a dog!
• Topped out at 17 mph
• And it could not be much improved
![Page 47: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
The lawsuit
• Who sued whom, and for what?
![Page 48: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Parties
• Crow v. Tidewater, Bayliner, and Brunswick (engine manufacturer)
• Why all 3?
![Page 49: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Causes of action
• Breach of express warranty
• Breach of implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose
![Page 50: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Trial proceedings
• Who heard the facts?
![Page 51: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Why a bench trial?
• Think about the strategy on each side
![Page 52: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Who won at trial?
![Page 53: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Who won at trial?
• Crow
• All 3 warranty counts of the complaint, held in Crow’s favor
![Page 54: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Appeal standard
• View of the evidence
• Standard of review on issues of law?
![Page 55: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Express warranty provision
• What is the source of this provision? Who enacted it, where did it come from?
![Page 56: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Why does the UCC apply here?
![Page 57: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Why does the UCC apply here?
There is at least one “merchant”
This is a transaction involving “goods”
-- UCC § 2-104(1), 2-105(2)
![Page 58: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
UCC § 2-313“Express warranties by the seller are
created as follows:
(a) Any affirmation of fact or promise made by the seller to the buyer which relates to the goods and becomes part of the basis of the bargain creates an express warranty that the goods shall conform to the affirmation or promise.
![Page 59: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
UCC § 2-313“Express warranties by the seller are
created as follows:
(b) Any description of the goods which is made a part of the basis of the bargain creates an express warranty that the goods shall conform to the description.
![Page 60: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Prior case law
• Daughtrey v. Ashe
• Diamond appraisal case
– Holding?
![Page 61: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Prop matrix statements
• Were they binding?
![Page 62: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Prop matrix statements
• NO!!
• They “did not relate to the particular boat bought by Crow”
![Page 63: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Brochure statement?
![Page 64: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Brochure statement?
• “A statement purporting to be merely the seller’s opinion or commendation of the goods does not create a warranty.”
![Page 65: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Was there a contract?
![Page 66: Contract Enforcement II](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051103/589ee9e21a28abea498c1996/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Was there a contract?
• Yes
• But – it did NOT include a warranty as to the speed of the boat