Continuous Student Growth Governing Board Study Session December 11, 2007
25
Continuous Student Growth Governing Board Study Session December 11, 2007 Where are we? What will it take to be better?
description
Continuous Student Growth Governing Board Study Session December 11, 2007. Where are we? What will it take to be better?. Vision and Mission. Vision Kyrene’s vision is to prepare all students to meet future educational and life challenges in order to make positive contributions to society. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Transcript of Continuous Student Growth Governing Board Study Session December 11, 2007
Continuous Student GrowthGoverning Board Study Session
December 11, 2007
Where are we? What will it take to be better?
2
Vision and Mission
VisionKyrene’s vision is to prepare all students to meet future
educational and life challenges in order to make positive contributions to society.
MissionTo realize our vision, Kyrene seeks to inspire and
engage our diverse community of students, staff, families and citizens to ensure continuous academic achievement and personal growth for every student.
3
Strategic Plan Goals
Goal #1: Student AchievementGoal #2: Resource AllocationGoal #3: School FacilitiesGoal #4: High Quality EmployeesGoal #5: Parental and Community
Involvement
4
District Goal # 1: Student Achievement
Ensure individual excellence for all students through a wide array of programs, a standards-based curriculum, meaningful assessments, superior instructional resources, and quality professional development
Objective Topics – Wide Array of Programs; Curriculum; Instruction; Resources; Individual Assessment; District-wide Student Assessments
5
Achievement Status Report
AIMS
CASS & MSS
Cohort Data
6
AIMS Data
Closing the Gaps in Grade 3 AIMS Math
0
20
40
60
80
100
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Annual Progress Required to Meet 100% Proficient for NCLB
100% by 2014
NecessaryProgress
NoProgress
StateExpectedProgress
2005, 2006 & 2007 Data From AIMS Summary Reports 2
Kyrene Performance
State Performance
State Expected Progress
7
AIMS Data
Closing the Gaps in Grade 5 AIMS Math
0
20
40
60
80
100
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Annual Progress Required to Meet 100% Proficient for NCLB
100% by 2014
NecessaryProgress
NoProgress
StateExpectedProgress
2005, 2006 & 2007 Data From AIMS Summary Reports 2
Kyrene Performance
State Performance
State Expected Progress
8
AIMS Data
Closing the Gaps in Grade 8 AIMS Math
0
20
40
60
80
100
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Annual Progress Required to Meet 100% Proficient for NCLB
100% by 2014
NecessaryProgress
NoProgress
StateExpectedProgress
Series4
2005, 2006 & 2007 Data From AIMS Summary Reports 2
Kyrene Performance
State Performance
State Expected Progress
9
AIMS Data
Closing the Gaps in Grade 3 AIMS Reading
0
20
40
60
80
100
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Annual Progress Required to Meet 100% Proficient for NCLB
100% by 2014
NecessaryProgress
NoProgress
NoProgress
Series4
2005, 2006 & 2007 Data From AIMS Summary Reports 2
Kyrene Performance
State Performance
State Expected Progress
10
AIMS Data
Closing the Gaps in Grade 5 AIMS Reading
0
20
40
60
80
100
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Annual Progress Required to Meet 100% Proficient for NCLB
100% by 2014
NecessaryProgress
NoProgress
StateExpectedProgress
Series4
2005, 2006 & 2007 Data From AIMS Summary Reports 2
Kyrene Performance
State Performance
State Expected Progress
11
AIMS Data
Closing the Gaps in Grade 8 AIMS Reading
0
20
40
60
80
100
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Annual Progress Required to Meet 100% Proficient for NCLB
100% by 2014
NecessaryProgress
NoProgress
StateExpectedProgress
Series4
2005, 2006 & 2007 Data From AIMS Summary Reports 2
Kyrene Performance
State Performance
State Expected Progress
12
District Academic Achievement Goals
2004 - 2010 MSS-EOG District Average Percent Proficient
40
60
80
100
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010Goal
Grade 3
Grade 5
Grade 8
13
2010 MSS Proficiency Goals
Grade 3 80%
Grade 5 85%
Grade 8 90%
(See chart for all grade level goals)
14
District Academic Achievement Goals
2004 - 2010 CASS-EOGDistrict Average Percent Proficient
0
20
40
60
80
100
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Goal
Grade 3
Grade 5
Grade 8
15
2010 CASS Proficiency Goals
Grade 3 75%
Grade 5 80%
Grade 8 90%
(See chart for all grade level goals)
16
Cohort Data
Matched students Clusters of 3 grade
levels Clusters of 3 years
of results MSS example Refer to chart
Year Grade Proficient Matched Total
04-05 6 1011
05-06 7 1135
06-07 8 1043 1700 2177
17
Communication of Achievement
Current proficiency
District goals
State goals
Gap
18
Four-pronged Approach
Quality instruction
Professional development
Enhanced assessment tools
Evaluation and accountability
19
Quality Instruction
Effective use of resources to support the curriculumAdopted curriculumAdopted materials Instructional time and tools
Planning instruction based on learning needs of students
20
Professional Development
Essential knowledge and skills for all teachers
In depth knowledge about assessment
Effective use of planning time
21
Enhanced Assessment Tools
District-wide benchmark assessments
Expertise in daily use of assessment for instructional planning
22
Evaluation and Accountability
Walk-through focus on district curriculum and adopted resources
Effective implementation of evaluation system
Teacher teams consistent review of student progress
Student achievement data artifacts as a focal point for evaluation
23
Consistent Timeline
August—Status of district goals for student achievement (local assessment system)
September—AIMS scores from previous year
October—AYP and School LabelsFebruary/March—Benchmark results
(future)
24
Additional Data
Cohort (presented earlier)
Rank ordering (available)
25
Questions/Discussion
