Scoring Summary SheetRFP No. PNC2114364P1

Continuing Engineering Services for Transportation and General Civil Engineering ProjectsApril 10, 2018

Firm Name Henry Sniezek Carlos Puentes John Foglesong Barney McCoy Richard Tornese Total Ranking

Atkins North America, Inc. 76 85 88 75 87 411 4

HDR Engineering, Inc. 81 90 90 79 91 431 2

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 87 90 86 73 88 424 3

RS&H, Inc. 84 88 87 86 92 437 1

PREFERENCE FOR LOCAL VENDORS - RFP's

115 S. Andrews Avenue, Room GC430, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

4. A re-vote or re-assessment of only the tied vendors.

5. Preference to vendor receiving a majority of the total first-place votes.

For all other competitive solicitations in which objective factors used to evaluate the responses from vendors are assigned point totals, if, upon the completion of final rankings (technical and price combined, if applicable) by the evaluation committee, a non-local business is the highest ranked proposer and the ranking of a local proposer is within five percent (5%) of the ranking obtained by the non-local proposer, the highest-ranked local proposer shall have the opportunity to proceed to negotiations with the county.

1. Vendor located within Broward County as set forth in Subsection 21.31.c.

2. Vendor which provides domestic partner benefits.

3. Vendor that has the lowest dollar volume of work, calculated by payments to vendor, by County over a five (5) year period from the date of the submittal.

Local Preference may not be applied to CCNA or Federally funded/governed procurements DELETE if not applicable

TIE BREAKER CRITERIA

Scoring Sheet

RFP No. PNC2114364P1

Continuing Engineering Services for Transportation and General Civil Engineering Projects

April 10, 2018

115 S. Andrews Avenue, Room GC430, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Evaluation Criteria - Project Specific Criteria Maximum Atkins North HOR Engineering, Inc.

Kimley-Horn and (Complete text of questions provided scparat.cly) Points America, Inc. Associates, Inc.

ABIUTYOF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL (Total Maximum 25 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria ·question 1 10 lS <6 °I Seo Evaluation Criteria - question 2 5 4- 5 4 See Evaluation Criteria. question 3 10 q 9 q

PROJECT APPROACH (J"otal Maximum 20 Points) -

See Evaluation Criteria ·question 4 10 ~ g 10

See Evaluation Criteria - question 5 5 4- 4 s See Evaluation Criteria· question 6 5 3 4- 5

EVIDENCE OF KNOWLEDGE ANO EXPERIENCE (Total Maximum 22 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria· question 7 10 I °I q q See Evaluation Criteria - question 8 7 7 0 7 See Evaluation Criteria ·question 9 5 5 5 s

PAST PERFORMANCE (Total Maximum 10 Pofnts)

See Evaluation Criteria ·question 10 10 7 C) C) QUALITY CONTROL

(Total Maximum 8 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria · question 11 8 ~ 7 7 WORKLOAD OF FIRM

(Total Maximum 5 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria· question 12 5 4 3 4 LOCATION

POINTS ENTERED BY PURCHASING (Total Maximum 5 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria - question 13 5 0 0 0 W1W~GNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET

REQUIREMENTS POINTS ENTERED BY PURCHASING (Total Maxlmum 2 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria - question 14 2 I 2 2 2 VOLUME OF PREVIOUS WORK ·- -

(Total Maximum 3 Points) POINTS ENTERED BY PURCHASING

Sec Evaluation Criteria ·question 15 3 0 2 2

TOTAL SCORE CALCULATED BY PURCHASING

Max 100 TOTAL SCORE WILL BE ENTERED BY PURCHASING Hundred

Henry Sniezek Name I

RS&H, Inc.

9 4 9

··-

9 4 4

'I 7 5

q

7

4

0

2

2

I

~0~ L..---" By signing this document I certify that I have abided by the Cone of Silence Ordinance and have

Signature vy .......... " not been influenced or coerced by anyone 1n the assignment of the points by me for this procurement.

76 81 87 84

Scoring Sheet

RFP No. PNC2114364P1

Continuing Engineering S ervices for Transportation and General Civil Engineering Projects

April 10, 2018

115 S. Andrews Avenue, Room GC430, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Evaluation Criteria • Project Specific Criteria Maximum Atkins North HOR Engineering, Inc.

Kimley-Horn and (Comploto toxt of questions provided separately) Points America, Inc. Associates, Inc.

ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL (Total Maximum 25 Points)

Seo Evaluation Criteria· question 1 10 C1 q er See Evaluation Criteria · question 2 5 'S s :< See Evaluation Criteria. question 3 10 g Cf I

PROJECT APPROACH (Total Maximum 20 Points)

Seo Evaluation Criteria • question 4 10 q JD Jo Seo Evaluation Criteria· question 5 5 £ $" ~ Soo Evalualion Criteria· question 6 5 ~ s s-

EVIDENCE OF KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE (Tota.I Maximum 22 Points)

Seo Evaluation Criteria ·question 7 10 q /o /"C Sec Evaluation Criteria· question 8 7 (p to 5 See Evaluation Criteria ·question 9 5 $'" s' s

PAST PERFORMANCE -(Total Maximum 10 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria· question 10 10 Jo lo /~

QUALITY CONTROL (Total M.axlmum 8 Points)

Seo Evaluation Criteria ·question 11 8 -z -J g WORKLOAD OF FIRM

(Total Maximum 5 Points)

Soe Evaluation Criteria • question 12 5 ~ s-- --s LOCATION POINTS ENTERED BY PURCHASING

(Total Maximum 5 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria ·question 13 5 0 0 0 WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET

REQUIREMENTS POINTS ENTERED BY PURCHASING (Total Maximum 2 Points)

Seo Evaluation Criteria· question 14 2 2 2 2 VOLUME OF PREVIOUS WORK POINTS ENTERED BY PURCHASING

(Total Maximum S Points)

Seo Evaluation Criteria ·question 15 3 0 2 2

(\ TOTAL SCORE CALCULATED BY PURCHASING

TOTAL SCORE ~ENTERED BY PURCHASING ~,o d

( c~~ ~ue~ Name ~:L\. I

RS&H, Inc.

er <

S'

9 s s

-·

9

-;

s

/D

7

C

0

2

2

~ ~v By signing this document I certify that I have abided by the Cone or Silence Ordinance and have

' not been influenced or coerced by anyone in the assignment of the poin ts by me for this Signature procurement.

85 90 90 88

Scoring Sheet

RFP No. PNC2114364P1

Continuing Engineering Services for Transportation and General Civil Engineering Projects

April 10, 2018

115 S . Andrews Avenue, Room GC430, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Evaluation Criteria - Project Specific Criteria Maximum Atkins North HOR Engineering, Inc.

Kimley-Horn and (Complolo lcxt of queslions provided separately) Points America, Inc. Associates, Inc.

ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL (Total Maximum 25 Points)

Seo Evaluation Criteria - question 1 10 ID { {) q Sec Evaluation Criteria. question 2 5 ~ 5 "-l Seo Evaluation Criteria· question 3 10 lo lo lo

PROJECT APPROACH ..

(Total Maximum 20 Points)

Soe Evaluation Criteria - question 4 10 q q q See Evaluation Criteria - question 5 5 5" 5 t-J Sec Evaluation Criteria • question 6 5 5 5 5

EVIDENCE OF KNOWLEDGE ANO EXPERIENCE (Total Maximum 22 Points)

Seo Evaluation Criteria - question 7 10 q q er See Evaluation Criteria - question 8 7 ~ 7 (

Soe Evaluation Criteria ·question 9 5 5 5 5 PAST PERFORMANCE

(Totll Maximum 10 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria - question 10 10 l o 9 Cf' QUALITY CONTROL

(Total Maximum 8 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria ·question 11 8 { I 1 ( WORKLOAD OF FIRM

(Total Maxlmum.&Polnts)

Soc Evaluation Criteria • question 12 5 s I ) ~ LOCATION POINTS ENTERED BY PURCHASING

(Total Maximum 5 Points)

Soc Eva luation Criteria· question 13 5 0 I 0 0 WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME ANO BUDGET

REQUIREMENTS POINTS ENTERED BY PURCHASING (Total Maximum 2 Points)

Seo Evaluation Criteria - question 14 2 2 2 2 VOLUME OF PREVIOUS WORK POINTS ENTERED BY PURCHASING

(Total Maximum 3 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria ·question 15 3 0 2 2

TOTAL SCORE CALCULATED BY PURCHASING

TOTAL SCORE WILL BE ENTERED BY PURCHASING Max 100 Hundred

John Foglesong Na mo

RS&H, Inc.

lo

'-/ f D

Cf '-/

'-/

9 l

5'

q

I

s

0

2

2

~ By signing this document I certify that I have abided by the Cone of Silence Ord inance and have not been innuenced or coerced by anyone in the assignment of the points by me for this

Signature procurement

88 90 86 87

Scoring Sheet RFP No. PNC2114364P1

Continuing Engineering Services for Transportation and General Civil Engineering Projects Apri l 10, 201 B

115 S. Andrews Avenue, Room GC430, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Evaluation Criteria - Project Specific Criteria Maximum Atkins North HOR Engineering, Inc.

Kimley-Horn and (Complete text of questions provided separately) Points America, Inc. Associates, Inc.

ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL (Total Maximum 25 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria ·question 1 10 ~ IC> ~ ?-..

Sec Evaluation Criteria · question 2 5 s !:::; -":::> -

See Evaluation Criteria ·question 3 10 (Q. \~ lb PROJECT APPROACH

(Total Maximum 20 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria · question 4 10 I %5 7 Seo Evaluation Criteria· question 5 5 s ~ ~ See Evaluation Criteria · question 6 5 ~ -:3 0

EVIDENCE OF KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE (Total Maximum 22 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria · question 7 10 '6 I 7 See Evaluation Criteria ·question 8 7 <t s «-t See Evaluation Criteria ·question 9 5 ~ y ::>

PAST PERFORMANCE (Total Maximum 10 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria · question 10 10 lb f D le> QUALITY CONTROL

(Total Maximum 8 Points)

Soc Evaluation Criteria · question 11 8 (p 1 5 WORKLOAD OF FIRM

(Total Maximum 5 Points)

Soo Evaluation Criteria· question 12 5 '--{ Y- ~ LOCATION POINTS ENTEREO BY PURCHASING

(Total Maximum 5 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria · question 13 5 0 0 0 WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET

REQUIREMENTS POINTS ENTERED BY PURCHASING (Total Maximum 2 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria· question 14 2 2 2 2 VOLUME OF PREVIOUS WORK

POINTS ENTERED BY PURCHASING (Total Mulmum 3 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria . question 15 3 I 0 2 2

TOTAL SCORE CALCULATED BY PURCHASING

TOTAL SCORE WlLL BE ENTERED BY PURCHASING Max 100 Hundred

Barney McCoy Name

RS&H, Inc.

<::> (---.,

5

lr-i

q s L\'

6 ¥:> s

la c:::::> 6

't-0

2

2

~51 By signing this document I cenify that I have abided by the Cone of Siience Ordinance and have not been innuenced or coerced by anyone in the assignment of the poinis by me for this

Signature procurement.

75 79 73 86

Scoring Sheet RFP No. PNC2114364P1

Continuing Engineering Services for Transportation and General Civil Engineering Projects April 10, 2018

115 S. Andrews Avenue, Room GC430, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

Evaluation Criteria - Project Specifi c Criteria Maximum Atkins North HOR Engineering, Inc.

Kimley-Horn and (Complete text of questions provided separately) Points America, Inc. Associates, Inc.

ABIUTY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL (Total Maximum 25 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria ·question 1 10 q /0 JO . See Evaluation Criteria - question 2 5 < 5 t./

I See Evaluation Criteria ·question 3 10 q JO 10

PROJECT APPROACH (Total Maximum 20 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria - question 4 10 9 q er See Evaluation Criteria - question 5 5 5 S" 5" See Evaluation Criteria ·question 6 5 ~ ~ c

EVIDENCE OF KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE (Total Maximum 22 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria ·question 7 10 JO 10 ~ See Evaluation Criteria ·question 8 7 6 h ~ See Evaluation Criteria ·question 9 5 b I-{ 4

PAST PERFORMANCE (Total Maximum 10 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria - question 10 10 JO JO JO QUALITY CONTROL

(Total Maximum 8 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria - question 11 8 ~ )) '3 WORKLOAD OF FIRM

(Total Maximum 5 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria · question 12 5 L-1 5 ~ LOCATION POINTS ENTERED BY PURCHASING

(Total Maximum 5 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria · question 13 5 0 0 0 WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET

REQUIREMENTS POINTS ENTERED BY PURCHASING (Total Maximum 2 Points)

Sec Evaluation Criteria· question 14 2 2 2 2 VOLUME OF PREVIOUS WORK POINTS ENTERED BY PURCHASING (Total Maximum 3 Points)

See Evaluation Criteria - question 15 3 0 2 2

TOTAL SCORE CALCULATED BY PURCHASING

TOTAL SCORE WILL BE ENTERED BY PURCHASING Max 100 Hundred

Richard Tornese Name

RS&H, Inc.

10

< JO

? ~

~

ID

h s /0

~

5"

0

2

2

-

a1A./?1 o___- By signing lhis document I certify that I have abided by lhe Cone of Silence Ordinance and have not been influenced or coerced by anyone 1n lhe assignment of the points by me for this

Signature I procurement

87 91 88 92