CONTENTS Report-Nettoor... · Revenue(B) Department, Government of Kerala vide...

CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1 -EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................... 01

CHAPTER 2 -DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION .......................................................... 03

CHAPTER 3 -TEAM COMPOSITION APPROACH, METHODOLOGY

AND SCHEDULE OF THE SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ............. 06

CHAPTER 4 - LAND ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................ 09

CHAPTER 5 -ESTIMATION AND ENUMERATION (WHERE REQUIRED)

OF AFFECTED FAMILIES AND ASSETS .................................................... 11

CHAPTER 6 –SOCIAL ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL PROFILE

(AFFECTED AREA AND RESETTLEMENT SITE) .................................. 13

CHAPTER 7 - SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT ............................................................... 15

CHAPTER 8 – SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN

INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................ 17

CHAPTER 9 - SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN BUDGET AND

FINANCING OF MITIGATION PLAN…………………………………......... 19

CHAPTER 10 - SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN MONITORING

AND EVALUATION ............................................................................................... 20

CHAPTER 11 - ANALYSIS OF COSTS AND BENEFITS AND

RECOMMENDATION ON ACQUISITION .............................................. 21

ANNEXURES.................................................................................................................................................. 23

SIA of Land Acquisition for Nettoor Boat Jetty

Centre for Management Development, Thiruvananthapuram 1

CHAPTER 1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1.1 Project and public purpose

The proposed project is intended to construct Nettoor Boat Jetty. The term ‘Jetty’

will be renamed as internationally accepted term for boat station, ‘Pier’. Nettoor

boat jetty is a minor jetty and will be implemented as Phase I development. The

jetty is proposed to be developed as floating pontoon. Automated docking

mechanism with smart jetty architecture is proposed for the jetty. The pontoon will

have covered roof to create a passenger comfort ambiance.

As per the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,

Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Section 2-(1)-(b)-(vi), the project can be

considered as a public purpose.

1.2 Location

The land to be acquired for the proposed project is located in Maradu Village of

Ernakulam District.

1.3. Size and attributes of land acquisition

An extent of 12.6 Ares of land under survey number99/1 from Maradu Village of

Ernakulam District is required for implementation of the proposed project.

1.4 Alternatives considered

No alternatives are identified for the implementation of the project.

1.5 Social impacts

The proposed project site is owned by Vimala Hridaya Matha Church. Other than

15 coconut trees, no structures are identified on the proposed site. Fishermen uses

one portion of land to park their fishing boats. The owners of the land demanded

fair compensation for the land and requested to allow fishermen to use the land.



1.6 Mitigation measures

Though, by considering the following measures the authorities can mitigate and

compensate the possible negative impacts of the land acquisition.

Compensation for the land owners as per the Right to Fair Compensation

and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act

2013.

Resettlement and Rehabilitation procedure as per the Policy issued by

Revenue(B) Department, Government of Kerala vide

G.O.(Ms)No.448/2017/RD dated 29/12/2017 for the rehabilitation and

resettlement package for land acquisition in the state in lieu of

RFCTLAR&R Act 2013.



CHAPTER 2

DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION

2.1 Background of the Project including Developer’s Background and

Governance/Management structure

Often quoted as the Queen of Arabian Sea, Kochi is a major port city located on the

south-western cost of India. It is a part of Ernakulam District in the State of Kerala.

The city have a total urban population of more than 2.1 million within an area of

440 sq. km. as of 2011. Population growth rate of the surrounding municipalities

and villages is more as compared to the urban area which in turn constitutes to

increased traffic in commute between the mainland, nearby municipalities,

adjoining islands and panchayats. Recent traffic surveys and studies indicates the

rapid growth of vehicles in the city premises. This in turn increase traffic jam

during peak hours.

Kochi Metro Rail System was introduced to reduce private transport and encourage

public transit. Kochi Metro Rail Limited (KMRL), as part of setting up of

Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA-KOCHI), have initiated steps to

implement a model transportation system for Kochi city region. Integrated Water

Transport System for Kochi is been initiated to integrate the water transport system

with other modes of transport

2.2 Rationale for Project, including how the project fits the public purpose criteria

listed in the Act.

At present several State Water Transport Development mainly operates water

transport system in Kochi. In addition to this various private operators and localised

jangar services operates service. Over the last decades the system have been

deteriorated due to depleting number of boats, low quality of boats, lack of safety

measures, poor assess of infrastructure to the jetties, etc. More than 20,000

passengers uses the services of present system on a daily basis of which more than

50% access water transport. It was also found through various surveys that more

than 70% of passengers are willing to shift to water transport system for transit as it

saves about 15 minutes in comparison with other mode of transport.

Centre for Management Development, Thiruvananthapuram


Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013


2.3 Details of Project size, location,

risks

The implementation of the proposed project requires an area of

The land to be acquired for the proposed project is located in

Ernakulam District.An estimated cost of INR 819.28 crores is expected to be the

total cost of the project including land acquisition for all

Fig. 2.1

SIA of Land Acquisition for

Centre for Management Development, Thiruvananthapuram


Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Section 2-(1)-(b)-(vi), the project can be


Details of Project size, location, capacity outputs, production targets, costs and

The implementation of the proposed project requires an area of 12.6

The land to be acquired for the proposed project is located in Maradu

An estimated cost of INR 819.28 crores is expected to be the

total cost of the project including land acquisition for all proposed boat jetties.

Fig. 2.1: Photographs of Proposed Project Area


4


), the project can be

production targets, costs and

12.6 ares of land.

Maradu Village of

An estimated cost of INR 819.28 crores is expected to be the

proposed boat jetties.

Project Area



2.4 Examination of alternatives

No alternatives is considered.

2.5 Phases of the Project Construction

The construction of the project will be completed based on the approved plans.

2.6 Core design Features, size and Type of Facilities

The existing jetty is built of cement and is in a decrepit condition. The term ‘Jetty’

will be renamed as internationally accepted term for boat station, ‘Pier’.Nettoor

boat jetty is a minor jetty and will be implemented as Phase I development. The

jetty is proposed to be developed as floating pontoon. Automated docking

mechanism with smart jetty architecture is proposed for the jetty. The pontoon will

have covered roof to create a passenger comfort ambiance.

2.7 Need for Ancillary Infrastructural Facilities

Road access of the existing jetty is in a dilapidated condition. This will be rectified

by providing adequate access roads with a minimum of 5 m width. Improved

infrastructure facilities such as good lighting, security and safety assurance, etc.,

will be provided.

2.8 Workforce Requirements (temporary and permanent)

Both temporary and permanent workforce will be employed with modern

machineries and equipment at appropriate stages of the project implementation.

2.9 Details of Social Impact Assessment/Environment Impact Assessment if

Already Conducted and any Technical Facility Reports

No Social Impact Assessment/Environment Impact Assessment has been conducted

previously.

2.10 Applicable legislations and policies

The land acquisition for the proposed project is governed by the Right to Fair

Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and

Resettlement Act (2013) & Rules (2015)



CHAPTER 3

TEAM COMPOSITION, APPROACH, METHODOLOGY AND

SCHEDULE OF THE SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

3.1 List of all Team Members with Qualifications

The details of the team members involved in the SIA are given in Annexure III.

3.2 Description and Rationale for the Methodology and Tools Used to collect

Information for the Social Impact Assessment

An inclusive and participatory approach through involvement of multiple

stakeholders such as elected representatives and project affected people including

vulnerable sections such as Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, women, and those

among below poverty line, at appropriate stages of the project.

3.3 Sampling Methodology Used

Qualitative information was gathered along with the field survey through public

consultation/Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) with all relevant stakeholders. The

public consultation encompassed the project components as well as its socio-

economic impacts. The SIA team had preliminary discussions with the key officials

of the district administration and gathered information regarding the status of the

government procedures, the project area and intensity of the acquisition. The team

also made a preliminary site visit with the officials for physical inspection and

information dissemination purposes. The existing conditions of land, status of

infrastructure/structures, land use pattern and the facilities available to people

residing in the project area were analysed.

The quantitative information regarding the families affected by the project was

collected through household surveys, in the form of structured questionnaires. The

survey was conducted in all the households of the persons affected by the project.

The results of the survey provided information pertaining to the demography,

socio-economic status and livelihood status of the target community, and formed

the basis for development of Social Impact Management Plan.



3.4 Overview of Information/Data Sources Used

The primary data was collected directly from the representatives of all affected

families through face to face interview. Structured questionnaires were used for

collecting the details of the affected people. The results of the survey provided

information pertaining to the demography, socio-economic status and livelihood

status of the target community.

The secondary data was collected from the Requiring Body and the Revenue

department. The SIA team had preliminary discussions with the key officials of the

district administration and gathered information regarding the status of the

government procedures, the project area and intensity of the acquisition.

3.5 Schedule of Consultations with Key Stakeholders

Date Details of Consultation

November 2020 Collection of documents form

Land Acquisition office

November 2020 Meeting with the officials of

Requiring Body

December 2020 Visit to project area

December 2020 Collection of Primary Data

19/01/2021 Public Hearing

3.6 Public Hearing

In accordance with the Section 5 of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency

in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, a Public Hearing

was at Vimala Hridaya Matha Church Parish Hall on 19/01/2021 at 2.30 pm

conducted to collect the views and opinions of the people affected by the project.

Prior intimation will be given to all the stakeholders regarding the date and venue

of the public hearing through advertisements in leading newspapers, individual

letters and/or over telephone.



Figure 3.1. Photos from Public Hearing



CHAPTER 4

LAND ASSESSMENT

4.1 Description of Land with the help of Maps, Information from Land

Inventories and Primary Sources

The implementation of the proposed project requires an area of 12.6Ares of land.

The land to be acquired for the proposed project is located in Maradu Village of

Ernakulam District.

Figure 4.1.Nettoor Boat Jetty Alignment Sketch

4.2 Entire area of impact under the influence of the project

A total area of 12.6Ares of land from Maradu Village of Ernakulam District needs

to be acquired for the proposed project.



4.3 Total Land Requirement for the Project

For the implementation of the proposed project, an extent of 12.6 Ares of land from

Maradu Village of Ernakulam Districtis required to be acquired.

4.4 Present Use of any Public, Utilized land in the Vicinity of the Project Area

No such land is identified.

4.5 Land (if any) Already Purchased, Alienated, Leased or Acquired, and the

intended Use for Each Plot of Land required for the project

No land has bees already acquired for the proposed project.

4.6 Quantity and Location of Land Proposed to be acquired for the Project

A total area of 12.6 Ares of land from Maradu Village of Ernakulam District needs

to be acquired for the proposed project.

4.7 Nature, Present use and classification of Land and if Agricultural Land,

Irrigation Coverage and Cropping Patterns

The land proposed to be acquired for the project is classified as purayidom.

4.8 Size of Holding, Ownership Pattern, Land Distributions and Number of

Residential Houses

Land under survey number99/1 (12.6 ares) of land needs to be acquired for the

proposed project. No residential structures are identified on the proposed project

site.

4.9 Land prices and recent changes in ownership, transfer and use of lands over

the last 3 years

As per the information received from the respondents, no land transactions were

done in the proposed area for the last 3 years.



CHAPTER 5

ESTIMATION AND ENUMERATION OF AFFECTED

FAMILIES AND ASSETS

5.1 Estimation of families

a) Families which are directly affected (own land that is proposed to be acquired)

The land proposed for acquisition is possessed by Vimala Hridaya Matha

Church.

5.2 Family of Scheduled Tribes and other Traditional Forest Dwellers who have

lost any of their Forest Rights

Not Applicable

5.3 Families which depend on Common Property Resources which will be affected

due to Land Acquisition for their Livelihood

No common property resources are affected by this land acquisition.

5.4 Families which have been assigned Land by the State Government for the

Central Government Under any of its Schemes and such Land is Under

Acquisition

Not Applicable

5.5 Families which have been Residing on any land in the Urban Areas for

proceeding three years of more prior to the acquisition of land

Not applicable

5.6 Families which have depended on the Land Being Acquired as a Primary

Source of Livelihood for three years prior to the acquisition

Not applicable

5.6.1 Families which are indirectly impacted by the project (not affected directly by the

acquisition of own lands)

Not applicable.



5.6.2 Inventory of productive assets and significant lands







CHAPTER 6

SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL PROFILE

6.1 Demographic Details of the Population in the Project Area

The land proposed for acquisition is possessed by Vimala Hridaya Matha Church.

6.2 Vulnerable Groups

Vulnerable groups are not identified in the proposed location.

6.3 Land Use and Livelihood





Table No. 6.1 Details of Owners

Sl. No.

Survey Number

Village Name Address Contact No.

1 99/1 Maradu Vimala Hridaya Matha Church,

Nettoor

Vimala Hridaya Matha Church,

Nettoor

9961811115- Fr. Patrick

(As per the letter no. C 11-388/17of Deputy Collector (L.A.), Kochi Metro Rail

Project dated 25/11/2020 land under survey no. 99/1 of Block 14 in MaraduVillage

of Kanayannur Taluk in Ernakulam District is given as private land. During field

survey, as part of Social Impact Assessment, the said land was claimed to be owned

by Vimala Hridaya Matha Church Nettoor. In the basic tax register (BTR) of

Maradu Village the land is noted as purambokke. This difference was noted during

public hearing. However, as per the proceedings noD. Dis./S.10/2313/2020

dated13/01/2021 of Tahsildar (L. R.) Kanayannur, as submitted by the Vicar

Church of Immaculate Heart of Mary Nettoor,has recorded changes approved in

the name and type of land in the aforementioned survey number.)



6.4 Local Economic Activities

No local economic activities are carried out.

6.5 Factors that Contribute to Local Livelihood

Not applicable.

6.6 Kinship Patterns and Social and Cultural Organization

The area have a pleasant social environment. Land owned by the affected people is

obtained either hereditarily or by direct purchase.

6.7 Administrative Organization

No administrative organisations are functioning in the area.

6.8 Political Organization

Properties of any political organizations are not included in the area of the proposed

acquisition.

6.9 Community Based Civil and Society Organization

No such organizations are affected by the proposed the project.

6.10 Regional Dynamics and Historical Change Process

No major negative impact could be found regarding the regional dynamics and

historical change processes.

6.11 Quality of the Living Environment

The Quality of the Living Environment is fair in the project area with decent

livelihood options and transportation facilities with access to amenities such as

Schools, Hospitals, Civil Organisations, etc.



CHAPTER 7

SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT

7.1 Approach to Mitigation

The CMD team made use of a combination of two research approaches i.e.,

quantitative and qualitative, for the identification of various social impact and the

mitigation measures. Adoption of a combination of both qualitative and

quantitative methodology was indented to obtain a more comprehensive data and

more holistic result without excluding any important area of assessment.

7.2 Measures to avoid, mitigate and compensate impact



Providing fair compensation to the owners will reduce the negative impacts.Also,

by considering the following measures the authorities can mitigate and compensate

the possible negative impacts of the land acquisition.



2013.





RFCTLAR&R Act 2013.

7.3 Measures that are included in terms of Rehabilitation and Resettlement and

Compensation as outlined in the Act

The Rehabilitation and Resettlement package as per the Policy issued by

Revenue(B) Department, Government of Kerala vide G.O.(Ms)No.448/2017/RD

dated 29/12/2017 for the rehabilitation and resettlement package for land

acquisition in the state in lieu of RFCTLAR&R Act 2013 shall be provided to the

affected people.



7.4 Measures that the Requiring Body has stated it will introduce in the project

proposal

The requiring body has stated that sufficient fund has been reserved as

compensation.

7.5 Alterations to project design and additional measures that may be required to

address the extend and intensity of impacts across various groups as identified

during SIA

Not applicable.

7.6 Detailed Mitigation Plan including detailed activities to be carried out for each

mitigation strategy, timelines for each mitigation strategy

To mitigate the social impact of the proposed land acquisition, R&R package

should be provided to the families as per the Policies issued by Revenue (B)

Department, Government of Kerala vide G.O. (MS)No.485/2015/RD dated

23/09/2015 and G.O. (Ms)No.448/2017/RD dated 29/12/2017 for the rehabilitation

and resettlement package for land acquisition in the state in lieu of RFCT in

LAR&R Act 2013.



2013.





RFCTLAR&R Act 2013.

7.7 The Social Impact Management Plan indicating which measures the Requiring

Body has committed to undertake and those that have been proposed, but not

committed to be undertaken by the Requiring Body

The requiring body has stated that sufficient fund has been reserved as

compensation.



CHAPTER 8

SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN INSTITUTIONAL

FRAMEWORK

8.1 Description of institutional structures and key person responsible for each

mitigation measures

The Government of Kerala vide G. O. (P) No. 649/2015/RD dated 04/12/2015 had

appointed Special Tahsildar, (L.A.)No.2,Kochi Metro Rail Project to perform one

or more functions of the collector under in the Right to Fair Compensation and

Transparency in Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation Act

(RFCTLARR), 2013 within their area of jurisdiction.

Also vide G. O. (P) M. No. 590/2015/RD dated 11 November 2015, Government of

Kerala, in line with the sub-section (1) of section 43 of the Right to Fair

Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Resettlement and

Rehabilitation Act (RFCTLARR) 2013 and sub-rule (1) of rule 21 of Right to Fair


Resettlement (Kerala) Rules, 2015, the Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) in

each district has been appointed as the Administrator for Rehabilitation and

Resettlement, for performing the functions under the said act and Rules in respect

of involuntary displacement of persons due to requisition of land. The

Administrator shall be responsible for the formulation, execution and monitoring of

the Rehabilitation and Resettlement scheme in respect of land acquisition.

Vide G. O. (P) M. No. 589/2015/RD dated 11 November 2015, in exercise of the

powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 44 of the Right to Fair

Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Resettlement and

Rehabilitation Act (RFCTLARR), 2013, the commissioner for Rehabilitation and

Resettlement supervising the formulation of Rehabilitation and Resettlement

scheme or plans, proper implementation of the same and post implementation of

social audit.



8.2 Specify the Role of Non-Governmental Organisation, if any

Providing support services of a dependable NGO can help in alleviating the

psycho-social impact of the acquisition.

8.3 Indicate Capacities Required and Capacity Building Plan, Including Technical

Assistance, if any

Not applicable

8.4 Timelines for Each Activity

Proper timeline for each activity should be framed in accordance with the Right to

Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and

Resettlement Act (2013) and Rules (2015).



CHAPTER 9

SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN BUDGET AND

FINANCING OF MITIGATION PLAN

9.1 Costs of all resettlement and rehabilitation costs

The requiring body stated that necessary budget provision exists for meeting the

cost of acquisition.

9.2 Annual budget and plan of action

Not Applicable

9.3 Funding sources with break up

Not Applicable



CHAPTER 10

SOCIAL IMPACT MANAGEMENT PLAN MONITORING AND

EVALUATION

10.1 Key monitoring and evaluative indicators

Monitoring is a long-term process, which should begin from the starting of the

project and should continue throughout the life of the project. Its purpose is to

establish benchmarks so that the nature and magnitude of anticipated social impacts

can be continually assessed. Monitoring involves the continuous or periodic review

to determine the effectiveness of recommended mitigation measures. The types of

parameters that can be monitored may include mitigation measures or design

features, or actual impacts. All the mitigation measures stated in Chapter 7 should

be considered as the indicators for evaluation.

10.2 Reporting mechanisms and monitoring roles

Rehabilitation and Resettlement procedures as stated in the Right to Fair


Resettlement act (2013) and Rules (2015) will be applicable.

10.3 Plan for independent evaluation

Not applicable.



CHAPTER 11

ANALYSIS OF COSTS AND BENEFITS AND RECOMMENDATION

ON ACQUISITION

11.1 Final conclusions on: Assessment of public purpose, less displacing

alternatives, minimum requirements of land, the nature and intensity of social

impacts, and viable mitigation measures and the extent to which mitigation

measures will address costs

The proposed project is intended to implement Nettoor Boat Jetty.







Through the proper measures as per Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency

in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement act (2013) and Rules (2015)

the negative impacts of land acquisition can be mitigated.

11.2 The above analysis will use the equity principle as a framework of analysis for

presenting a final recommendation on whether the acquisition should go

through or not.

Comparing/weighing the positive against the negative impacts, it can be observed

that the implementation of the project will result in improving the overall

development of tourism in Ernakulam district. Through the execution of proper

measures listed in chapter 7, the negative impact of the land acquisition can be

mitigated.

Thus, it can be concluded that the former outweighs the latter reaffirming the

identified site as the most suitable and apt one for the project. The families that are

affected would require adequate and fair compensation. It is observed that many of



the negative impacts highlighted can be minimized or reduced with effective and

relevant mitigation measures and strategies mentioned.

Thus the study suggests to acquire the land providing adequate compensation to the

affected people.



ANNEXURES

i. Details of the land covered in the SIA study

ii. List of key informants contacted and interacted

iii. SIA Team members

iv. Various Government Orders concerning Social Impact Assessment

v. Questionnaires used for survey

vi. Concerns raised and corresponding answers given during public hearing

vii. Notice and newspaper notification regarding public hearing

viii. Attendance of public hearing



ANNEXURE-I

Details of the Land Covered in the SIA Study



ANNEXURE-II

List of Key Informants Contacted and Interacted

1. Deputy Collector, L.A, Kochi Metro Rail Project

2. Special Tahsildar, (L.A.) No.2, Kochi Metro Rail Project

3. Concerned Officials of Water Metro Project

4. Elected Representatives



ANNEXURE-III

SIA Team Members

Sl. No. Name Designation Qualification

1. Dr. G. Suresh Project Director Ph. D.

2. Shri. Riyas K. Basheer Project Coordinator MBA, B.Tech.

3. Dr. S. Remadevi Domain Expert Ph. D.

4.. Shri. Suradh K. Surendran Field Coordinator M. Tech.

5. Shri. Albin M. Project Officer MBA

6. Shri. Josukutty Kurian Project Officer MSW



ANNEXURE-IV

Various Government Orders Concerning Social Impact Assessment on Land Acquisition



ANNEXURE- V

Questionnaires used for survey



ANNEXURE-VI

Concerns raised and answers given during public hearing

t]cv Bi-¦-IÄ/Bh-iy-§Ä/]cm-Xn-IÄ _Ô-s¸« A[n-Im-cn-I-fpsS adp-]Sn

tP¡_v hnÂk¬

1994 –Â dokÀtÆ \S-¯n-b-t¸mÄ {]kvXpX `qan ]pd-t¼m¡v `qan-bmbn sXämbn tdJ-s¸-Sp-¯p-I-bp-m-bn. AXp-hsc Icw AS¨v h¶n-cp¶ ]Ån hI Øe-am-Wv. BbXv Xncp¯n ]Ån-hI `qan-bmWv F¶v amäm-\mbn Devf FÃm \S-]-Sn-Ifpw sN¿p-Ibpw 13/1/2021 þÂ Xl-knÂZm-cpsS D -̄chv e`n-¡p-Ibpw sNbvXn-«p-Å-Xm-Wv. F¶mÂ hntÃPv Hm^o-knÂ \n¶pw XpSÀ \S-]-Sn-IÄ sNbvXp In«n-bn-Ã, Xl-knÂZm-cpsS D -̄chv hntÃPv Hm^o-knÂ sImSp-¯n-«p-Å-Xp-am-Ip-¶p.

hfsc hÀj-§-fmbn {]kvXpX `qan-bpsS \S-]Sn {Ia-§-fp-ambn \-S¶p sImn-cn-¡p-I-bm-bn-cp-¶p.

\ne-hnÂ Gsä-Sp-¡m³ Dt±-in-¡p¶ `qan hntÃPv cPn-ÌÀ {]Imcw kÀ¡mÀ ]pd-t¼m¡v `qan-bm-Wv. AXv hntÃPv tcJ-bnÂ Xncp¯n h¶mte kzImcy `qan Bhp-I-bp-Åq. \ne-hnÂ hntÃPv tcJ {]Imcw `qan ]pd-t¼m¡v `qan-bm-Wv.

kmaq-lym-LmX ]T-\-¯n-\mbn e`n¨ tcJbnÂ {]kvXpX `qan kzImcy `qan F¶mWv tcJ-s¸-Sp-¯n-bn-cn-¡p-¶-Xv.

hntÃPv tcJ {]Imcw amdn kzImcy `qan Bsb-¦nÂ am{Xta Fsä-Sp-¡Â \S-]Sn \S-¡p-I-bp-Åq.

kn,-sI, Pb-cmPv

Gsä-Sp-¡m³ Dt±-in-¡p¶ `qan-bnÂ IShv Dv. AhnsS hÀj-§-fmbn aÕy-_-Ô\ hÅ-§Ä Ibän hbv¡p-¶-Xn\pw he DW-¡p-¶-Xn\pw aäpw D]-tbm-Kn¨p hcp-¶p. `qan Gsä-Sp¯p t]mbmÂ \ne-hn-epÅ kuIcyw \jvS-s¸-Sp-Ibpw hÅw Ibän CSm-\pw, he DW-¡m\pw DÅ kuIcyw CÃm-Xm-Ipw. A§s\ Dm-bmÂ R§-fpsS sXmgn-ens\ _m[n-¡pw. hÅw Ibän CSm³ Øew CÃmsX h¶mÂ AXv \in¨p t]mIpw. At©mfw IpSpw-_-§sf _m[n¡pw. D]-Po-h-\-amÀKw XS-k-s¸-SmsX IShv \ne-\nÀ¯n-thWw `qan Gsä-Sp¯v ]²Xn \S-̧ m-¡m³.

\n§-fpsS ]cmXn dnt¸mÀ«nÂ DÄs¸-Sp-¯pw. dnt¸mÀ«v FIvkvt]À«v I½nän ]cn-tim-[n¨p XpSÀ \S-]-Sn-IÄ kzoI-cn-¡p-¶-Xm-Wv.

\n§-fpsS Bh-iy-§Ä D¶-bn-¨p-sIm-pÅ At]£ sat{Smbv¡pw If-IvSÀ¡pw \ÂIm-hp-¶-Xp-am-Wv.



ANNEXURE-VII

Notice and newspaper notification regarding public hearing



Janmabhoomi Dated 01/01/2021



Deepika Dated 01/0/2021



ANNEXURE-VIII

Attendance of public hearing

CENTRE FOR MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT (An Autonomous Institution Sponsored by the Government of Kerala)

THYCAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

KERALA – 695014

CONTENTS Report-Nettoor... · Revenue(B) Department, Government of Kerala vide...

Documents

Transcript of CONTENTS Report-Nettoor... · Revenue(B) Department, Government of Kerala vide...