Contents · 4 2 4 13 Network diplomacy in economic negotiations 4 2 4 14 Seminar: Possible network...

3

Contents Pp.

1. List of the planned results of the course in correlation with the planned results of the curriculum………..……………………………………………………………………………….4 2. The course in the structure of the curriculum ……………………………………….…………5 3. The course credits and academic hours dedicated to seminars, lectures and self-study …...….5 4. The contents of the course by sections and topics with academic hours dedicated to specific types of classes and self-study…………………………………………………………………….6 5. Training and methodological support for self-study in the course...………………………….16 6. Evaluation criteria …………………….………………………………………………...…….17 7. List of essential and additional readings for the course.………………………………………22 8. Methodological instructions for students of the course…………………………………….....27 9. List of informational technologies essential for the classes…………………………………..27 10. The necessary equipment for the classes…………………………………….………………27

4

1. List of the planned results of the course in correlation with the planned results of the curriculum

By the end of the course students are expected to develop the following capacities: Capacity code Capacity and its description Cultural – 1 (OK – 1) Ability to apply abstract thinking, analyze and

systemize information Cultural – 8 (OK – 8) Ability to work in a group with tolerance in perceiving

social, ethical and cultural differences, finding compromise

Professional – 1 (ОПК – 1) Ability to perceive, generalize and analyze information, skills of systemic thinking, formulating goals and ways to achieve them, ability to indicate international political and diplomatic meanings of problems and processes

Professional – 5 (ОПК – 5) Ability to formulate speech in spoken and written forms clearly and logically correct in the professional field

Special professional – 1 (ПК – 1)

Ability to identify problems and set goals, evaluate alternatives and choose optimal decisions, evaluate results and consequences of implemented managerial decisions


Ability to organize the work of a group, consisting of international students.


Ability to analyze the process of decision-making in international politics


Ability analyze and apply complex mechanisms of multilateral and integration diplomacy

5

2. The course in the structure of the curriculum, general information

The course ‘Contemporary Network diplomacy: theory and practice’ is aimed at students, who specialize in International Relations and World Politics studies. The main objective of the course is to prepare students to work at the Foreign Ministry, as well as structures associated with international relations. The course focuses on studying theory of negotiations and diplomacy, as well as developing practical skills for networking. It complements the other courses on International Relations, Foreign Policy analysis courses as well as courses on Negotiations, Diplomacy, etc.

The main' goal of the course is to provide students with fundamental knowledge in network diplomacy of the XXI century.

Course objectives include: • Knowledge and Understanding competences: Knowledge of the theory and

practice of network diplomacy of the 2000s. Understanding the role of governmental and non-governmental actors in network diplomacy.

• Analytical competences: Analysis of the role of network diplomacy in world's political, economic and socio-cultural processes in the 2000s. Implementing analytical skills applying networking techniques.

• Practical competences: Acquiring skills for working out goals and objectives for successful networking. • Communication competences: Communicating with the opposite side, the ability

to persuade, convince negotiating partners. Working in groups. By the end of this course students should be able to: 1. Know the theoretical approaches to negotiation process. 2. Be able to prepare for negotiations, conduct them and fix the results. 3. Know theoretical and practical approaches to public diplomacy. 4. Know theoretical and practical aspects of network diplomacy. Grading plan: 40% - final paper, 4000-5000 words, complying with the requirements given be the

teacher. 30% - class participation, group discussions, presentations 30% - class attendance

3. The course credits and academic hours dedicated to seminars, lectures and self-study

The total scope of the course equals 2 Credits, and 84 Academic hours

3.1. The scope and the types of work:

Types of work Scope of work

Academic hours

Credits

Total scope 84 2 Class work

Lectures 8 Seminars 22

Self-studying total 54 Including

6

Course paper 13,5 Course paper presentation 13,5 In-class paperwork on home reading 13,5 Self-studying 13,5

Types of routine check In-class

work,presentations

Type of assessment

Final paper

4. The contents of the course by sections and topics with academic hours dedicated to specific types of classes and self-study

Topics of the course, total scope and scope by types of classes

№

п/п Topic

Tot

al s

cope

(a

cade

mic

Types of classes, including self-study and capacity (ac. hours)

For

ms

of e

valu

atio

n

аудиторные учебные занятия

Self-study

Total Lectures Seminars

1

Introduction. Theory of negotiations.

4 2 4

2

Seminar: Analytical reports: sports, science, global health

4 2 4

3 Practical and psychological aspects of negotiations 4 2 4

4

Seminar: Article analysis: digital diplomacy, small states, public diplomacy

4 2 4

5

Theoretical aspects of network diplomacy 4 2 4

6

Seminar: Theoretical models of networking 4 2 4

7

Public diplomacy concept 4 2 4

8 Seminar: Public diplomacy in U.S., E.U. 4 2 4

7

9 Russia Public diplomacy in MENA region 4 2 4

10 Seminar: Public diplomacy in other countries 4 2 4

11

International negotiations on space, Arctic and environmental issues

4 2 4

12

Seminar: Building multi-level cooperation in solving ecological problems, space and Arctic exploration

4 2 4

13

Network diplomacy in economic negotiations 4 2 4

14

Seminar: Possible network solutions to sanction disputes

4 2 2

15

15.Conclusion: prospects for network diplomacy 2 2

ИТОГО: 84 14 16 54

4.2. The contents of the course by topic

1. Introduction. Theory of negotiations.

Theory and practice of negotiations. Major world schools of negotiations. Main paradigms of negotiation process. The lecture gives the rundown of the whole course, its goals and requirements for student work within the class. The lecture also gives a brief overview of the literature. The first lecture explains the concept of negotiations within the framework of modern diplomacy. It also reviews all major schools of negotiation. Discussing the importance of studying the theory and practice of negotiating in the framework of international bilateral/multilateral diplomacy in the modern world is expected during the lecture as well.

Readings:

Burganova, I.N. (2016). Fenomen setevoy diplomatii v sisteme mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh [The Network Diplomacy Phenomenon in International Relations]. Inernational Research Journal, No. 6 (48), Part 1,

Constantinou, C.M., Kerr, P., Sharp, P., et al. (2016). The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Cooper, A.F., Heine, J., Thakur, R., et al. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

8

Kolosova, I.V. (2014). Labirinty “setevoy diplomatii” [The “network diplomacy” labirynths]. Posy-Soviet Issues, No. 2,

Manor, I., (2015), Towards a Network Model of Diplomacy? The Case of the UN in Geneva. [Online] Available: https://digdipblog.com/2015/05/10/towards-a-network-model-of-diplomacy-the-case-of-the-un-in-geneva/ (May 10, 2015).

Metzl, J.F. (2001). Network Diplomacy. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 2, No. 1,

Sharp, P. (2009). Diplomatic Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge Studies in International Relations.

Zaharna, R.S. (2005). The Network Paradigm of Strategic Public Diplomacy. Foreign Policy in Focus, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1-4.

2. Seminar: Analytical reports

Practice: reports, based on article analysis: sports diplomacy, science diplomacy, global health diplomacy

Readings:

Bubalo, A. Football Diplomacy Redux: The 2015 Asian Cup and Australia’s Engagement with Asia. 2013, Lowy Institue for International Policy. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/football-diplomacy-redux-2015-asian-cup-and-australias-engagement-asia

Daniel F. Runde, Amasia Zargarian,Building Networks of Diplomatic Cooperation Opportunities for U.S.-Venezuela Science Cooperation, report of the CSIS Project on Prosperity and Development, August 2014 https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/140820_Runde_BuildingNetworks_Web.pdf

Meeting Summary, Global Health Diplomacy: A Way Forward in International Affairs, Centre on Global Health Security, Inaugural conference of the Global Health Diplomacy Network, 28 - 29 June 2011 https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Global%20Health/280611summary.pdf

Murray, S. Sports diplomacy in the Australian context: A case study of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Sports Law Ejournal, 2013. https://epublications.bond.edu.au/slej/18/

Schlegel F., “Swiss Science Diplomacy: Harnessing the Inventiveness and Excellence of the Private and Public Sectors,” Science & Diplomacy, Vol. 3, No. 1 (March 2014). http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/editorial/2014/educating-for-science-diplomacy.

9

3. Practical and psychological aspects of negotiations

The lecture gives a review of various psychological and practical aspects of negotiations as well as their functions. The lecturer is expected to explain possible negotiation situations and give the list of possible psychological tactics in specific cases given. Special attention will be paid to the elements and characteristic features of negotiations with religious, terroristic organizations and NGO.

Readings

Acuff, Frank L. How to Negotiate Anything with Anyone Anywhere Around the World. - New York : AMACOM. 2008. — Available from: eBook Academic Collection (EBSCOhost)

Carnevale, P. De Dreu, C.K.W. Methods of Negotiation Research. - Brill Academic Publishers, 2006

Hornickel J. Negotiating Success : Tips and Tools for Building Rapport and Dissolving Conflict While Still Getting What You Want. — John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

4. Seminar: Article analysis

Practice: reports, based on article analysis: digital diplomacy, public diplomacy, small states’s diplomacy.

Readings:

Flew, Terry & Hartig, Falk (2014) Confucius Institutes and the network communication approach to public diplomacy. IAFOR Journal of Asian Studies, 1(1), pp. 27-44. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/74877/

Gass, R. H., & Seiter, J. S. (2009). Credibility and Public Diplomacy. In N. Snow & P. M. Taylor (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. New York, NT: Routledge.

Hayden, C. (2012). The Rhetoric of Soft Power: Public Diplomacy in Global Contexts. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Leonard, Marc. Public Diplomacy, Foreign Policy Centre, June 17, 2002 https://fpc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/35.pdf

Osipova Lena, Seeing Beyond the Bear. Selective Processing and Russian Public Diplomacy in the West. 2013

Searching for Influence and persuasion in Network-Oriented Public Diplomacy: What Role for «Small States»?, SURFACE, 2013. https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016&context=exchange

10

Sharp. Paul, "Revolutionary States, Outlaw Regimes and the Techniques of Public Diplomacy", in Jan Melissen (ed.), The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan. 2005

Sucharipa, Ernst, “21st Century Diplomacy”, The Future of Diplomacy Discussion Papers, Vienna. Diplomatic Academy of Vienna, 2002

Yelena Osipova, “New Russian Public Diplomacy: Conceptualization, Practice and Limitations,"abstract, International Studies Association, Presented at the 2012 ISA Annual Convention, San Diego, California, USA (April 1-4, 2012). http://files.isanet.org/ConferenceArchive/d8f26c6d8298478ea6920dfaf0f3aed2.pdf

Zaharna, Rhonda S., "The Network Paradigm of Strategic Public Diplomacy", Foreign Policy In Focus, Policy Brief, 10(1), April 2005

5. Theoretical aspects of network diplomacy

The lecture emphasizes the importance of network diplomacy outlining its main challenges in' the 2lst century. Network diplomacy is perceived as a “next step” in the evolution of international diplomacy.

Readings

Gass, R. H., & Seiter, J. S. (2009). Credibility and Public Diplomacy. In N. Snow & P. M. Taylor (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy. New York, NT: Routledge.

Metzl, Jamie F., "Network Diplomacy", Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, Winter/Spring 2001


6. Seminar: Theoretical models of networking

Diplomatic solutions for main international conflict situations through networking. The group will discuss possibilities to utilize networking diplomacy as a tool to prevent and mediate conflicts.

Readings

Brian Hacking, Jan Melissen, Shaun Riordan, Paul Sharp, FUTURES FOR DIPLOMACY Integrative Diplomacy in the 21st Century. Netherlands Institute of International Relations “Clingendael”. 2012

11


Heine, Jorge, "On the Mariner of Practicing the New Diplomacy". Working Paper, no. 11, Waterloo, Ontario. The Centre for International Governance Innovation (GIGI), October 2006.

7. Public diplomacy concept

The lecture is focused on public diplomacy in the Russian Federation, its main functions, objectives and priorities. The lecture gives an overview of government authorities responsible for implementing public diplomacy in the country. Special attention is paid to discussing possible prospects of Russian public diplomacy.

Readings




Leonard, Marc. Public Diplomacy, Foreign Policy Centre, June 17, 2002 https://fpc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/35.pdf

Osipova Lena, Seeing Beyond the Bear. Selective Processing and Russian Public Diplomacy in the West. 2013

Sharp. Paul, "Revolutionary States, Outlaw Regimes and the Techniques of Public Diplomacy", in Jan Melissen (ed.), The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan. 2005


Yelena Osipova, “New Russian Public Diplomacy: Conceptualization, Practice and Limitations,"abstract, International Studies Association, Presented at the 2012 ISA Annual Convention, San Diego, California, USA (April 1-4, 2012). http://files.isanet.org/ConferenceArchive/d8f26c6d8298478ea6920dfaf0f3aed2.pdf

12

Zaharna, Rhonda S., "The Network Paradigm of Strategic Public Diplomacy", Foreign Policy In Focus, Policy Brief, 10(1), April 2005

8. Seminar: Public diplomacy in U.S., E.U.

Insight in U.S. and E.U. public diplomacy, it’s history, present, effectiveness.

Readings

Brian Hocking, Jan Michael Smith, An emerging diplomatic system for the EU? Framework and Issues, ECPR Standing Group on the European Union Conference, Porto, Portugal 24-26 June 2010, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/52fa/984ba888c605c7a05ee23f9d8f868c9f6129.pdf

Salih Bicakci, Deniz Rende, Sevinc Rende & Olcay Taner Yildiz, WikiLeaks on the Middle East: Obscure Diplomacy Networks and Binding Spaces, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 2014 Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 459–473. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19448953.2014.940763

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, "America's Edge: Power in the Networked Century". Foreign Affairs, 88(1), January/ February 2009

Smith, M.H. (2015). The EU in a Diplomatic Actor in the Post-Lisbon Era: Robust or Roothless Hybrid? In: J.A Koops, & G. Macaj (Eds.), The European Union as a Diplomatic Actor (pp.11–30). The European Union in International Affairs Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London

9. Russia’s Public diplomacy in MENA region

Key tendencies in Russia Public diplomacy in MENA region

Readings

10. Seminar: Approaching Middle East conflicts through Network diplomacy

Developing a model of Approaching Middle East conflicts through network diplomacy

Readings

Brooks, D. B., & Trottier, J. (2014). De-nationalization and de-securitization of transboundary water resources: the Israeli–Palestinian case. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 30(2), 211-223.

Cleveland, W. L., & Bunton, M. (2016). A history of the modern Middle East. Westview Press.

13

Cohen, H. (2013). Joint Israeli-Palestinian Political Activity in Jerusalem: Characteristics and Challenges1. In Locating Urban Conflicts (pp. 132-150). Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Coskun, B. B. (2016). Cooperation over water resources as a tool for desecuritisation: the Israeli–Palestinian environmental NGOs as desecuritising actor. European Journal of Economic and Political Studies, 2(2), 97-115.

Golay, F., Ziegler, S., Harari, N., Métaireau, B., Carneiro, C., & Schuler, M. (2014). Academic Cooperation to Foster Research and Advocacy Competences in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (West Bank). Technologies for Sustainable Development (pp. 263-274).

Ide, T., & Frölich, C. (2014). Water conflict or water cooperation? A discursive understanding of water conflict and cooperation in Israel and Palestine. In Norwich Conference on Earth System Governance.

Malul, M., Bar-El, R., & Schwartz, D. (2010). Patterns of cooperation in high-tech— Constraints, feasibility, and benefits: Results of a study among Palestinians and Israelis. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 27(1),. 75-92.

Malul, M., Schwartz, D., & Bar-El, R. (2016). The role of academic institutions in mitigating the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Journal of Policy Modeling, 38(1), 125-137.

Martins, B. O. (2016). The EU against the New Normal: Avoiding the Banalization of the Israeli Palestinian Dispute. Mediterranean Politics, 1-5.

Metzl, J. F. (2001). Network diplomacy. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs.., 2, 77

Miller, B. (2016). Israel–Palestine: One State or Two: Why a Two-State Solution is Desirable, Necessary, and Feasible. Ethnopolitics, 15(4), 438-452.

Peters, J. (2013). The Routledge Handbook on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. Routledge.

Salih Bicakci, Deniz Rende, Sevinc Rende & Olcay Taner Yildiz, WikiLeaks on the Middle East: Obscure Diplomacy Networks and Binding Spaces, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 2014 Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 459–473. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19448953.2014.940763

Schoenfeld, S., Zohar, A., Alleson, I., Suleiman, O., & Sipos-Randor, G. (2014). A place of empathy in a fragile contentious landscape: environmental peacebuilding in the eastern Mediterranean. Geographies of Peace, 171-193.

Seidel, T., & Abu‐Nimer, M. (2016). Peace and Reconciliation Processes. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Nationalism; 1-2.

14

Springer, J. E. (2015). Assessing Donor-driven Reforms in the Palestinian Authority: Building the State or Sustaining Status Quo?. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 10(2), 1-19.

Voltolini, B. (2012). The role of non-state actors in EU policies towards the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. European Union institute for security studies, P.23

11. International negotiations on space, Arctic and environmental issues

Network diplomacy as a possible tool of tackling space, Arctic and environmental issues

Readings

Ali, S. H., Hamid, Z. A.; Susskind, L. (2015). Environmental diplomacy : negotiating more effective global agreements. (2nd ed.). Oxford: OUP.

Dorsey, Kurk, Environmental Diplomacy. [Online] Available: http://www.americanforeignrelations.com/E-N/Environmental-Diplomacy.html (December 15, 2017)

12. Seminar: Buiding multi-level cooperation in solving ecological problems, space and Arctic exploration

Ecological problems and space as a place for building multi-level network cooperation

Readings

Nick Mabey, Liz Gallagher and Camilla Born, Understanding Climate Diplomacy. Building diplomatic capacity and systems to avoid dangerous climate change, research report, E3G, October 2013. https://www.e3g.org/docs/E3G_-_Understanding_Climate_Diplomacy.pdf

Saner, Raymond, Brief for GSDR 2015, Science Diplomacy to support global implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), Centre for Socio-Eco-Nomic Development (CSEND), Geneva* https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/6654135-Saner-Science%20diplomacy%20suggested%20revisions%203%20final.pdf

13. Network diplomacy in economic negotiations

Readings

Moons, Selwyn and Van Bergeijk, Peter A. G. (2009). Economic Diplomacy and Economic Security, New Frontiers for Economic Diplomacy, pp. 2-3. Instituto Superior de Ciéncias Sociais e Politicas. http://bit.ly/2jPDXNb

Rothbard, M. N. (2012). The Ricardian Law of Comparative Advantage. Mises Institute Austria. http://bit.ly/2C7rScO

15

Saner, R. & Yiu, L. (2001). International Economic Diplomacy: Mutations in Post-Modern Times. Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. http://bit.ly/2kZu0QM

14. Network diplomacy in solving sanction disputes

Using network diplomacy as a possible tool for solving sanction disputes

Readings

Moons, Selwyn and Van Bergeijk, Peter A. G. (2009). Economic Diplomacy and Economic Security, New Frontiers for Economic Diplomacy, pp. 2-3. Instituto Superior de Ciéncias Sociais e Politicas. http://bit.ly/2jPDXNb

Rothbard, M. N. (2012). The Ricardian Law of Comparative Advantage. Mises Institute Austria. http://bit.ly/2C7rScO

Saner, R. & Yiu, L. (2001). International Economic Diplomacy: Mutations in Post-Modern Times. Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. http://bit.ly/2kZu0QM

Stulberg Adam N., Natural Gas and the Ukraine Crisis, From Realpolitik To Network Diplomacy, PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 338, August 2014 Georgia Institute of Technology. http://www.ponarseurasia.org/memo/natural-gas-and-ukraine-crisis-realpolitik-network-diplomacy

15.Conclusion: prospects for network diplomacy

Summing up and analyzing prospects for network diplomacy

Readings

Burganova, I.N. (2016). Fenomen setevoy diplomatii v sisteme mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh [The Network Diplomacy Phenomenon in International Relations]. Inernational Research Journal, No. 6 (48), Part 1,

Constantinou, C.M., Kerr, P., Sharp, P., et al. (2016). The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Cooper, A.F., Heine, J., Thakur, R., et al. (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kolosova, I.V. (2014). Labirinty “setevoy diplomatii” [The “network diplomacy” labirynths]. Posy-Soviet Issues, No. 2,

Manor, I., (2015), Towards a Network Model of Diplomacy? The Case of the UN in Geneva. [Online] Available: https://digdipblog.com/2015/05/10/towards-a-network-model-of-diplomacy-the-case-of-the-un-in-geneva/ (May 10, 2015).

16

Metzl, J.F. (2001). Network Diplomacy. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 2, No. 1,

Sharp, P. (2009). Diplomatic Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge Studies in International Relations.

Zaharna, R.S. (2005). The Network Paradigm of Strategic Public Diplomacy. Foreign Policy in Focus, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1-4.

5. Training and methodological support for self-study in the course

5.1. Types of self-studying work

• Making notes at the lectures.

• Preparatory work for seminars and presentations.

• Home reading and searching information.

• Preparatory work for in-class paperwork and mid-term exam.

5.2. Recommendations on preparing presentations

The topics of presentations should be approved by the professor. Each performance can take no longer than 10 minutes. The performance is evaluated both by the professor and the students according to the following list.

Check list for evaluating presentations

1. How informative is the presentation?

a) comprehensive

b) decent

c) satisfactory

d) weak

2. How deep is the analysis?

a) comprehensive

b) decent

c) satisfactory

17

d) weak

3. How organized was the presentation?

a) comprehensive

b) decent

c) satisfactory

d) weak

4. Presentation skills

a) professional

b) satisfactory

c) need practice

d) weak

5. Personal comments on the speakers:

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Total grade ____________%

5.5. Examples of topics for presentation

Theoretical: Network diplomacy: theoretical aspects

Analytical: Network diplomacy in solving Syrian crisis

6. Evaluation criteria

6.1. Register of evaluations in the course

1) List of capacities developed by students during the course and the stages of their shaping during the course

№№ Respective topic during the course

Capacity and its description with the code

Evaluation form

1 1. Introduction. Theory of negotiations

Cultural – 1 (OK – 1) Ability to apply abstract thinking, analyze

Class discussions

18



5.Theoretical aspects of network diplomacy

8.Seminar: U.S. public diplomacy

13.Approaching Middle East conflicts through Network diplomacy

and systemize information Presentation

2 4.Seminar: Article analysis

8.Seminar: U.S. public diplomacy

10. Seminar: Network diplomacy in solving sanction disputes

12.Seminar: Buiding multi-level cooperation in solving ecological problems and space exploration

Cultural – 8 (OK – 8) Ability to work in a group with tolerance in perceiving social, ethical and cultural differences, finding compromise

Class discussions

Presentation

3 1. Introduction. Theory of negotiations.



5.Theoretical aspects of network diplomacy

7.Public diplomacy concept

9.Negotiation mechanisms of economic diplomacy

11.International negotiations on space, Arctic and environmental issues

Professional – 1 (ОПК – 1) Ability to perceive, generalize and analyze information, skills of systemic thinking, formulating goals and ways to achieve them, ability to indicate international political and diplomatic meanings of problems and processes

Presentation

Class discussions

19




14. Seminar: Possible network solutions to Israeli-Palestinian, Iranian and Syrian conflict.

Professional – 5 (ОПК – 5) Ability to formulate speech in spoken and written forms clearly and logically correct in the professional field

Class discussions

Presentation

5 2. Seminar: Analytical reports




Special professional – 1 (ПК – 1) Ability to identify problems and set goals, evaluate alternatives and choose optimal decisions, evaluate results and consequences of implemented managerial decisions

Class discussions

Presentation


6.Seminar: Theoretical models of networking


Special professional – 5 (ПК – 5) Ability to organize the work of a group, consisting of international students.

Class discussions

Presentation

7 1. Introduction. Theory of negotiations.


4.Seminar: Article analysis

6.Seminar: Theoretical models of

Special professional – 8 (ПК – 8) Ability to analyze the process of decision-making in international politics

Class discussions

Presentation

20

networking


15.Conclusion: prospects for network diplomacy

2а) Description of criteria and grades

General criteria for evaluating

A (90-100%)

B (82-89%)

C (75-81%)

D (67-74%)

E (60-67%)

The work (paperwork) completely responds to the goals of the course

The work (paperwork) generally responds to the goals of the course

The work (paperwork) responds to some of the goals of the course, but has considerable flaws in responding to the others

The work (paperwork) does not respond to most or all of goals of the course

The work (paperwork) does not respond to/ contradicts the goals of the course/ does not achieve them

Oral answer A

B

C

Independent and original understanding of facts, clear and thought-through argumentation, powerful and convincing analysis

Clear logic and analysis, certain extent of originality in understanding facts, the work is in general well-grounded and convincing

Satisfactory structure and analysis, lack of

21

D

E

originality or critical understanding of facts

Logic is poor, originality is lacking and/ or facts are not critical enough understood

Logic is very poor, is lacking

General skills А

B

C

D

E

The student demonstrates absolutely appropriate and accurate use of a wide range of general skills provided for in the course or in the task

The student demonstrates use of a rather wide range of skills

The student demonstrates use of a satisfactory range of required skills

The student uses some of the general skills, which are used poorly or not appropriately

The student does not demonstrate enough general skills, the work is poor

2b) Description of the evaluation scale Type of work Grade Criteria

In-class work А (90-100%) Systemic vision of network diplomacy, ability to analyze effectively and thoroughly В (82-89%)

С (75-81%) D (67-74%) Е (60-66%) F (less than 60%)

In-class paperwork on home reading

А (90-100%) Capacity to outline the key points of the home read papers and to generalize the main ideas of research materials and documents

В (82-89%) С (75-81%) D (67-74%) Е (60-66%) F (less than 60%)

Final paper А (90-100%) Knowledge of the key features of network diplomacy, ability to operate with literature, understanding of network processes in the world,

Processes В (82-89%) С (75-81%)

22

D (67-74%) ability to make a model of networking for a particular case. Е (60-66%)

F (less than 60%)

3) Examples of evaluation works

Examples of topics for the paper / presentation

Theoretical: Network diplomacy: theoretical aspects

Analytical: Network diplomacy in solving Syrian crisis

4) Methodic materials that define the process of evaluating knowledge, skills and abilities and their practice that characterizes stages of shaping capacities

Types of work Knowledge and capacities tested in the process of this type of work

Share of the type of work in the final grade

Attendance and participation

Accurate answers on the seminar topics, active participation in discussions, demonstration of knowledge of essential and additional readings All the capacities

10%

In-class paperwork on home reading (10 times, 5 open questions, up to 15 minutes). If missed, can be replaced by a research paper

All the capacities 25%

Midterm exam (written in-class, 2 essay questions, duration 1 hour 20 minutes)

All the capacities 65%

Total

See Table 2b All the capacities

100%

7. List of essential and additional readings for the course

Sources

www.mid.ru www.worldbank.org www.wto.org

23

www.ebrd.org www.minfin.gov.ru www.un.org www.wto.ru http://globalization.report.ru/ www.unctad.org

Essential readings

1. Acuff Frank L. How to Negotiate Anything with Anyone Anywhere Around the World. - New York: AMACOM, 2008. - Available at: eBook Academic Collection (EBSCOhost)

2. Carnevale, P. De Dreu, C.K.W. Methods of Negotiation Research. - Brill Academic

Publishers, 2006 Available at: eBook Academic Collection (EBSCOhost)

3. Gelfand, Michelle and Jeanne Brett (eds.), The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books, 2004. Available at: eBook Academic Collection (EBSCOhost)

4. Metzl, J.F. (2001). Network Diplomacy // Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. –

2001. - Vol. 2, No. 1. - https://carnegieendowment.org/2001/04/01/network-diplomacy-pub-681

5. Zaharna, R.S. The Network Paradigm of Strategic Public Diplomacy // Foreign Policy in Focus. 2005. - Vol. 10, No. 1. – P. 1-4. - https://fpif.org/the_network_paradigm_of_strategic_public_diplomacy/

Additional readings

1. Bátora, Jozef [email protected] or Diplomacy.gone? Foreign Affairs Administration in the Information Age : dissertation submitted to the Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, December 2005. - https://www.sv.uio.no/isv/forskning/aktuelt/arrangementer/disputaser/arkiv/fulltxt/Batora.pdf

2. Bicakci, Salih, Deniz Rende, Sevinc Rende & Olcay Taner Yildiz, WikiLeaks on the Middle East: Obscure Diplomacy Networks and Binding Spaces // Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies. – 2014. - Vol. 16, No. 4. – P.. 459–473. -https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/19448953.2014.940763

3. Bill,Scott,. The Skills' of Negotiating. New York City: John Wiley & Sons, 1981

4. Brian Hocking, Jan Michael Smith, An emerging diplomatic system for the EU? Framework and Issues / ECPR Standing Group on the European Union Conference, 2010. - Porto, Portugal. - https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/52fa/984ba888c605c7a05ee23f9d8f868c9f6129.pdf

5. Bubalo, A. Football Diplomacy Redux: The 2015 Asian Cup and Australia’s Engagement with Asia / Lowy Institue for International Policy, 2013. - https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/football-diplomacy-redux-2015-asian-cup-and-australias-engagement-asia

6. Roemer C., Garb P., Neu J., Graham J. A Comparison of American and Russian Patterns of Behavior in Buyer-Seller Negotiations Using Observational Measures// International

24

Negotiation. A Journal of Theory and Practice. – 1999. – Vol. 4, No 1. – P. 37-61. Available at: Business Source Premier (EBSCOhost)

7. Cateora Philip' R., Mary C. Gilly, and John L. Graham, International Marketing (14th edition), McGraw-Hill, 2009

8. Constantinou, C.M., Kerr, P., Sharp, P., et al. The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy. London: Sage Publications, 2016.

9. Cooper, A.F., Heine, J., Thakur, R., et al. The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

10. Crockett, Roger О., The 2lst Century Meeting // BusinessWeek. - 2007. - February 26. – P. 72-80.

11. Czerniawska F. Management Consultancy : What Next? - Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.

12. Daniel F. Runde, Amasia Zargarian, Building Networks of Diplomatic Cooperation Opportunities for U.S.-Venezuela Science Cooperation : report of the CSIS Project on Prosperity and Development, August 2014 https://csis-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/140820_Runde_BuildingNetworks_Web.pdf

13. Day Hodgson, James, Yoshihiro Sano, and John L. Graham Doing Business With the New Japan. Boulder. СО: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008

14. Edward T. Hall, The Silent Language (New York: Doubleday, 1959), The Hidden Dimension (New York: Doubleday, 1966), and Beyond Culture (New York: Anchor, 1981).

15. European Civil Protection And Humanitarian Aid Operations, Syria Factsheet, 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/echo/where/middle-east/syria_en

16. Flew, Terry & Hartig, Falk Confucius Institutes and the network communication approach to public diplomacy // IAFOR Journal of Asian Studies. – 2014. - 1(1). - P. 27-44. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/74877/

17. Ghauri Pervez and Jean—Claude Usunier (eds.), Interactional Business Negotiations, Oxford: Pergamon, 1996

18. Gorjão, Paulo, The reform of the Portuguese diplomatic network / Portuguese Institute of International Relations and Security (IPRIS), 2010. http://www.ipris.org/?page=pub&id=C

19. Graham John L., Alma Mintu-Wimsatt, and Wayne Rodgers, Explorations of Negotiation Behaviors in Ten Foreign' Cultures Using a Model Developed in the United States // Management Science. - January 1994. - Vol. 40, No.1. – P. 72—95.

20. Hendon Donald W., Rebecca Angeles Hendon, and Paul Herbig, Cross-Cultural Business Negotiations, Westport, CT: Quorum, 1996

21. Hernandez Requejo, William and John L. Graham, Global Negation: The New Rules, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008

22. Hodge Sheida, Global Smarts, New York: Wiley, 2000

23. Hofstede Geert, Cultures Consequences (2nd editton), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2001

24. Hornickel J. Negotiating Success : Trips and Tools for Building Rapport and Dissolving Conflict While Still Getting What You Want. — John Wiley & Sons, 2013

25. Jeanne M. Brett, Negotiating Globally. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 2001

25

26. Jönsson, Christer, Hall, Martin, Essence of Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Martin_Hall7/publication/268051590_The_Essence_of_Diplomacy/links/54eeed210cf2e2830865c0c0/The-Essence-of-Diplomacy.pdf

27. Katz Lothar, Negotiating International Business and Principles of Negotiating International Business (both Charleston, SC: Booksurge LLC, 2008)

28. Kopelman, S. and Rosette, A.S. Cultural variation in response to strategic display of emotions in negotiations. Special Issue on Emotion and Negotiation in Group Decision and Negotiation (GDN), 2008

29. Kotani, T. Crisis management in the East China Sea, SIPRI, 2015. https://www.sipri.org/publications/2015/sipri-fact-sheets/crisis-management-east-china-sea

30. Lam N. Mark and John L. Graham, China Now: Doing Business in the World’s Most Dynamic Market, New York: McGraw—Hill, 2007

31. Leonard, Marc. Public Diplomacy. The Foreign Policy Centre, 2002. - https://fpc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2006/09/35.pdf

32. Lewicki Roy J., David M. Saunders, and John W. Minton’s, Negotiation. Readings, Exercises, and Cases. 3rd ed., New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill, 1999

33. Mabey, N., Liz Gallagher and Camilla Born, Understanding Climate Diplomacy. Building diplomatic capacity and systems to avoid dangerous climate change: research report / E3G, October 2013. https://www.e3g.org/docs/E3G_-_Understanding_Climate_Diplomacy.pdf

34. Maliniak, D.Plouffe M. A Network Approach to the Formation of Diplomatic Ties ResearchGate, 2011. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228152316_A_Network_Approach_to_the_Formation_of_Diplomatic_Ties

35. Meeting Summary, Global Health Diplomacy: A Way Forward in International Affairs, Centre on Global Health Security: Inaugural conference of the Global Health Diplomacy Network, 28 - 29 June 2011 https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Global%20Health/280611summary.pdf

36. Mehrabian, Albert, Silent Messages: Implicit Communication of Emotions and Attitudes (2nd edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1980.

37. Moran Robert T. and William G. Stripp, Dynamics of Successful International Business Negotiations. Houston: Gulf, 1991.

38. Murray, S. Sports diplomacy in the Australian context: A case study of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade // Sports Law Ejournal. 2013. https://epublications.bond.edu.au/slej/18/

39. Osipova,Y “New Russian Public Diplomacy: Conceptualization, Practice and Limitations,"abstract, International Studies Association, Presented at the 2012 ISA Annual Convention, San Diego, California, USA (April 1-4, 2012). http://files.isanet.org/ConferenceArchive/d8f26c6d8298478ea6920dfaf0f3aed2.pdf

40. Rudderham M.A. Middle Power Pull: Can Middle Powers use Public Diplomacy to Ameliorate the Image of the West?" February 2008. (YCISS. Working Paper, No 46). http://media.leeds.ac.uk/papers/pmt/exhibits/3033/WP46-Rudderham.pdf

41. Salacuse Jeswald W., Making, Managing, and Mending Deals around the World in the let Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003

26

42. Saner R. Expert Negotiation (2nd Edition). - Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2004.

43. Saner, Raymond Brief for GSDR 2015, Science Diplomacy to support global implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) / Centre for Socio-Eco-Nomic Development (CSEND). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/6654135-Saner-Science%20diplomacy%20suggested%20revisions%203%20final.pdf

44. Schlegel F. Swiss Science Diplomacy: Harnessing the Inventiveness and Excellence of the Private and Public Sectors // Science & Diplomacy. - 2014. - Vol. 3, No. 1. http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/editorial/2014/educating-for-science-diplomacy.

45. Schmidt, Juliane Between Irrelevance and Integration? New Challenges to Diplomacy in the 21st Century and the Role of the EEAS. November 2014. (EU Diplomacy Paper, No. 8) http://aei.pitt.edu/58683/

46. Schmidt, Juliane, Joining up or falling apart: towards a networked communications model for EU foreign policy, European Policy Centre, Policy Brief. 2015. http://aei.pitt.edu/67892/1/pub_5991_joining_up_or_falling_apart.pdf

47. Schuster Camille and Michael Copeland, Global Business, Planning for Sales and Negotiations, Fort Worth, TX: Dryden, 1996

48. Sharp, P. (2009). Diplomatic Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge

Studies in International Relations.

49. Searching for Influence and persuasion in Network-Oriented Public Diplomacy: What Role for «Small States»?, SURFACE, 2013. https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1016&context=exchange

50. Sparks. D. B. The Dynamic's of Effective Negotiation (second edition). Houston, Texas: Gulf Publishing Co., 2003

51. Stulberg Adam N., Natural Gas and the Ukraine Crisis, From Realpolitik To Network Diplomacy, PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 338, August 2014 Georgia Institute of Technology. http://www.ponarseurasia.org/memo/natural-gas-and-ukraine-crisis-realpolitik-network-diplomacy

52. The Private Diplomacy Survey 2008: Mapping of 14 Private Diplomacy Actors in Europe and America. Brussels: Initiative for Peacebuilding, 2008.

53. West Joel and John L. Graham, A Linguistics-Based Measure of Cultural Distance and Its Relationship to Managerial Values // Management International Review. – 2004. - 4(3). P. 239-260.

54. Бурганова И.Н. Феномен сетевой дипломатии в системе международных

отношений (на примере Российской Федерации) [The Network Diplomacy Phenomenon in International Relations] // Международный научно-исследовательский журнал. . – 2016. - No. 6 (48), Part 1. - https://research-journal.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/6-1-48.pdf#page=120

55. Колосова, И.В. Labirinty “setevoy diplomatii” [The “network diplomacy” labirynths] // Проблемы постсоветского пространства. – 2014. - No. 2. – P. 173-180. - https://www.postsovietarea.com/jour/article/viewFile/18/19.pdf

27

8. Methodological instructions for students of the course

Type of classes Student activities

Lecture Writing a summary of lectures: making brief sketches, noting down key points, conclusions, generalizations and terms consistently; noting down important points, key words. Terms difficult for understanding and memorizing should be discussed in class, questions should be posed to the lecturer. In case the questions are big they should be discussed with the lecturer during consultations.

Seminars Working on the topics of the course with special attention to its goals and structure. Specific attention should be drawn to the methodology of the course and its contents as well as requirements for certain types of work, especially studying the readings, writing paperworks and preparing presentations. Working with the summary of lectures, studying essential and additional readings.

Final paper Special attention should be drawn to terms and methodology of the course. Developing skills of systemic approach and analysis, learning to formulate logical and well-grounded answers for the questions.

9. List of informational technologies essential for the classes

In the course of studying the following are regularly used: computer equipment to collect, store and distribute information on the course; electronic databases of the Tyulin Scientific Library of MGIMO-University for search and acquisition of information for the course (the list of additional readings) as well as for preparation of presentations and research papers. Presentations and lectures are held with the use of slides, graphic objects and videos (via Internet). Interaction among students and between students and the lecturer is as well conducted by the use of electronic mail.

10. The necessary equipment for the classes

Classes are held in a multimedia room, since students and the lecturer regularly use a computer to present lectures or to show home presentations

Contents · 4 2 4 13 Network diplomacy in economic negotiations 4 2 4 14 Seminar: Possible network...

Documents

Transcript of Contents · 4 2 4 13 Network diplomacy in economic negotiations 4 2 4 14 Seminar: Possible network...