Contaminations LPIS QA - marswiki.jrc.ec.europa.eu
14
10-2-2020 1 The European Commission’s science and knowledge service Joint Research Centre Contaminations LPIS QA Nataša Luketić Unit D5, JRC
Transcript of Contaminations LPIS QA - marswiki.jrc.ec.europa.eu
10-2-2020
1
The European Commission’s scienceand knowledge service
Joint Research Centre
ContaminationsLPIS QA
Nataša Luketić
Unit D5, JRC
10-2-2020
2
Presence of contamination in the RP
Contamination check is a qualitative inspection performed inside the RP perimeter of selected item of inspection.
If the LUI of selected RP is expanded and aggregated for anexpanded ETS measurement, contamination reporting is done onlyfor selected item of inspection (RP).
Annex I. TABLE 6 Non-agricultural LC features
Data quality scope:
Abundance of the non-agricultural land cover features which are inside the RP Class type:
• Artificial sealed surface and associated areas
• Forest and Woodland
• Scrubland
• Water Bodies
• Natural Bare areas
• Waterlogged Vegetation
10-2-2020
3
Annex II. Important notes, point 2.9
Before the inspection….
MS should duly document their LPIS RP specifications esp. regarding non-agricultural features and their minimum dimensions and size that constitute triggers for the contamination of a reference parcel.
Upload the document in: Optional Supportive Document
Annex II. Flow of events
VI. Inspect the Reference Parcel
Identify by visual inspection, map out and exclude from the area of the agricultural land cover, all non-agricultural land cover features bigger than 300 m2 (or 100 m2, if the spatial resolution of the reference orthoimage and the nature of the feature allow), as well as all non-agriculture linear features wider than 2 meters.
10-2-2020
4
How to collect non-agricultural LC features
• By delineation in EtsInspectionMeasurement.gml:• Features bigger than 300 m2,
• Count the number of individual distinct non-agricultural land cover features by class type,
• By counting in RP_ANF [EtsObservations.xml]:• Features smaller than 300 m2,
• Count and report the presence of any other not delineated individual non-agricultural feature found within the LUI,
• Alternatively provide a point location in EtsInspectionMeasurement.gml.
How to collect non-agricultural LC features
• Count only individual and distinct non-agricultural land cover feature in RP_ANF [EtsObservations.xml],
• Do not count small intrusions of non-agricultural land cover at the RP boundary, caused by imprecise matching with the reference orthoimage and delineation artefacts,
10-2-2020
5
How to report contamination for a RP
Report in RP_CNT [EtsObservations.xml] following features:
• Any feature artificial in origin that seal the soil surface (buildings, roads) regardless the size,
• Any other natural or man-made feature that do not seal the soil that is not utilized in agricultural practice if it splits the parcel in two,
• Do not count non-agricultural features already mapped in ineligible layer in case it grew bigger.
How to report contamination for a RP
Report in RP_CNT [EtsObservations.xml] only if observed eligible agricultural area is conforming.
Provide point location in NonConformity.gml only for those that triggered non-conformity.
10-2-2020
6
Use of waiver C for contamination
• Verify, if the contamination is fully located within theseparate GIS layer for non-eligible areas, or if it is fullylocated outside the separate GIS layer for eligible areas,
• If positive apply waiver C in RP_CNT [EtsObservations.xml] and deliver the GIS layer separately within the ETS reporting package
Upload the layer in: Other GIS Layers
Contamination class type:
Artificial sealed surface and associated areas
Visible road and a windmill inside RP perimeter
Reporting for QE2a:
Area non conformance = 0Contamination = 1
10-2-2020
7
Contamination class type:
Artificial sealed surface and associated areas
Visible built up construction inside RP perimeter
Reporting for QE2a:
Area non conformance = 0Contamination = 1
Contamination class type:
Artificial sealed surface and associated areas
Visible built up construction inside RP perimeter
Reporting for QE2a:
Area non conformance = 0Contamination = 1
NOTE: Pro-rata PG (80%)
10-2-2020
8
Contamination class type:
Artificial sealed surface and associated areas
Visible built up area inside RP perimeter
Reporting for QE2a:
Area non conformance = 1Contamination = 0
Contamination class type:
• Artificial sealed surface and associated areas
• Water bodies
Visible electric poles and a natural pond inside RP perimeter
Reporting for QE2a:
Area non conformance = 0Contamination = 0
NOTE: It is a man-made feature that do not seal the soil but it does not split the RP (on the ground level) in two.Electric pole has a foundation smaller than 0,5 m usually without a concrete sealing. The capability of detecting the nature of the pole is strongly depending on the density and height of the vegetation (the crop) surrounding the pole. These poles can remain part of the agricultural area. The pond visible on the image is just a temporary occurrence depending of the water situation.
10-2-2020
9
Contamination class type:
Artificial sealed surface and associated areas
Visible electric poles with artificially sealed surface inside RP perimeter
Reporting for QE2a:
Area non conformance = 0Contamination = 1
NOTE: Due to it's type and size of this pole - as visible on a VHR image - we are clearly able to classify that the pole is part of the stable electricity infrastructure. It's shape describes us, that it is part of an appr. 400KV e-transfer network infrastructure, and that it has a concrete foundation 2x2 meters. The type of the pole itself is a clear mark to categorize it as non-agricultural feature that should be excluded from agricultural area.
Contamination class type:
Forest and woodland
Visible row of trees inside RP perimeter
Reporting for QE2a:
Area non conformance = 0Contamination = 1
10-2-2020
10
Contamination class type:
Forest and woodland
Visible forest inside RP perimeter
Reporting for QE2a:
Area non conformance = 1Contamination = 0
Contamination class type:
Scrubland
Visible shrubs inside RP perimeter
Reporting for QE2a:
Area non conformance = 0Contamination = 1
10-2-2020
11
Contamination class type:
Scrubland
Visible shrubs outside RP perimeter
Reporting for QE2a:
Area non conformance = 0Contamination = 0
Contamination class type:
Scrubland
Visible shrubland inside RP perimeter
Reporting for QE2a:
Area non conformance = 1Contamination = 0
10-2-2020
12
Contamination class type:
Water bodies
Visible artificial pond inside RP perimeter
Reporting for QE2a:
Area non conformance = 0Contamination = 1
Contamination class type:
• Water bodies• Forest
Visible natural pond and encroachment of the forest inside RP perimeter
Reporting for QE2a:
Area non conformance = 0Contamination = 0
10-2-2020
13
Contamination class type:
Water bodies
Visible natural and temporary water depressions inside RP perimeter
Reporting for QE2a:
Area non conformance = 0Contamination = 0
NOTE: It is a temporary occurrence of the feature splitting the RP in two
Contamination class type:
Bare soil
Visible road inside RP perimeter
Reporting for QE2a:
Area non conformance = 0Contamination = 0
NOTE: It is a man-made feature that do not seal the soil but it does not split the RP in two
