Consultation on Children’s Centre · Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support...
Transcript of Consultation on Children’s Centre · Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support...
Consultation on Children’s Centre
Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020
Consultation Analysis Report
February to March 2020
Author: Consultation, Equalities & Accessibility Team, Business Intelligence, Northamptonshire County Council Owner: Children First Northamptonshire, Northamptonshire County Council
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
2 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 3
2. Consultation Methodology ................................................................................................... 4
3. Summary of Feedback ........................................................................................................... 6
3.1. Questionnaire feedback .................................................................................................. 6
3.1.1. About the respondent............................................................................................... 6
3.1.2 Parents/carers feedback ............................................................................................ 7
3.1.3 Professionals feedback ............................................................................................ 18
3.1.4 Feedback from other interested parties .................................................................. 23
3.1.5 Demographic information ........................................................................................ 25
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
3 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
1. Introduction
In February 2017, the model for the delivery of targeted Children’s Centres services changed
from being outsourced to becoming a Northamptonshire County Council (NCC) delivered
Service, with the exception of those located within Corby. Cabinet agreed at the time to
continue the operation of the targeted Children’s Centre offer in Corby. These services in
Corby have been provided under contract by Corby Community Interest Company at four
sites.
At Cabinet in January 2020, permission was granted for a further contract to be developed
on the same terms and conditions to the existing supplier for the period up to 31st March
2021. Delegated authority was also given to the Director of Children’s Services, in
consultation with the Cabinet Member for Children, Families and Education to procure and
award the new contract for Children’s Centre Services in Corby commencing 1st April 2021.
The exact financial implications are to be determined upon reprocurement, however it is the
expectation that delivery will be within the existing annual budget envelope.
In 2018/19 Corby Children’s Centre (CCC) had approximately 800 individual children
accessing their services during the year. In summary CCC deliver:
Outreach and sustained engagement through 1:1 and group work. Approximately
800 children and 600 parents have been engaged with through this work.
The provision of early intervention services for parent and children during pregnancy
and the first 2 years of child life through 6 monthly course (Groups supporting 1001
days agenda course and Great Expectations).
The provision of early intervention services for families regarding domestic
abuse/alcohol abuse and mental health Solihull Programme and Time Out for You.
Contact with all children with SEND in Corby that are known to NCC to enable access
to all early years services
A community hub, building social capital and cohesion providing a variety of services
either themselves or in partnership with other local services.
A basic skills course and volunteering course to help parents take up employment
opportunities.
The purpose of the services is to enable children and families to access appropriate support
as early as possible, to help them maintain their quality of life, prevent any problems getting
worse and reduce the demand for specialist support service and potentially reduce the
number of children coming into care.
In September 2019, following an internal review by the Strategy and Commissioning
Manager, and in consultation with NCC’s Leadership Team, it was determined that the
impact of financial reductions were unknown and so it was agreed to maintain the service at
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
4 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
current levels in order to allow time for further exploration about the impact of the service.
This would also allow for a broader, formal consultation and service delivery review to take
place. This consultation was therefore not regarding a budget reduction but focussed on
informing the reprocurement of services. The feedback from the consultation will help give a
better understanding of people’s views on the current services and inform service delivery in
the future.
The consultation was held between 17th February 2020 and 29th March 2020. This report is
an analysis of the information and data gathered during this consultation. It should be noted
that from Monday 23rd March central government placed the UK into ‘lockdown’ due to the
COVID-19 pandemic. Although the consultation was still available online most children’s
centres were closed during the last few days of the consultation and even where ones
remained open there was minimal activity and footfall. So the lockdown may have impacted
the number of paper questionnaires being physically collected or returned to the children
centres during the last week of the consultation. Consideration has been given to the
number of responses received compared to the usage statistics available and it has been
deemed unlikely that the reduction in attendees during the final week of the consultation
has made any significant statistical difference to the final results of the consultation.
This consultation was conducted by Children First Northamptonshire and the Consultation,
Equalities & Accessibility Team based within NCC’s Business Intelligence team, and was
carried out in compliance with the Council’s Consultation and Engagement Policy and
Statement of Required Practice.
2. Consultation Methodology
The following outlines the public consultation methodology used to generate the material /
data for analysis.
Due to the breadth of potential stakeholders, a base questionnaire was devised. The
questionnaire was designed to:
Inform customers and stakeholders of the current service delivery, demands, and
performance and the consultation proposal.
Seek views on the current service delivery to understand what is considered to be
working well and help identify potential areas of improvement.
Gain an understanding of the demographics of respondents.
A number of qualitative and quantitative questions were asked to gain an understanding of
respondents’ views. There were different sets of questions depending on whether the
respondent had used the children’s centre services as a parent or carer, if they had
professional experience of the children’s centres, or if they were responding in any other
capacity. The questionnaire was made available on a dedicated internet web page on NCC’s
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
5 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
Consultation Hub, https://northamptonshire.citizenspace.com, which is where all of the
Council’s consultations are published. Paper copies of the consultation documents were
available upon request and made readily available at the four Corby children centres under
consultation.
During the consultaton period the questionnaire underwent two minor changes. The first
change occurred on the morning of the 18th February. This was the second day of the
consultation. An error was identified with the online version of the questionnaire. Question
10 (the second set of statements asking parents/carers respondents of their satisfaction with
services) read correctly however a typographical error in the options provided meant the
options read incorrectly, with the word ‘dissatisfied’ presented instead of ‘satisfied’. This
was immediately corrected. Response levels were reviewed at the time which showed only
two responses. We deem that due to the low response rate, the statistical error is minimal
compared to overall response rate of 259 parents/carers who would have viewed that set of
questions.
The second change to the questionnaire was with the paper questionnaire. Upon early data
entry of the initial paper questionnaires it became apparent that some parent/carer
respondents did not understand or fully follow the instructions of the questionnaire, as
there were several occurances of what was clearly parent/carer respondents completing the
professional question set in addition to their own parent/carer questions. Once identified, a
decision was made to split the question sets on to two separate paper questionnaires – one
soley for parent/carers and one soley for professionals to avoid any further confusion with
the paper copies. These stakeholder specific questionnaires were put in place from 11th
March onwards. The professional question responses that were clearly incorrectly answered
by parent/carers have been excluded from this analysis. This had no impact on the online
version of the questionnaire because of the question logic in place which directed
respondents to the appropriate section of the questionnaire depending on the capacity in
which they were responding to the consultation.
Promotional materials, i.e. posters, were placed within the children centres and staff actively
promoted the consultation amongst attendees and invited them to participate in the
consultation. Commissioning officers also held two informal drop-in sessions at Pen Green
between 9am and 1pm on the 11th and 12th March. This enabled face to face user
interactions between service users and commissioning and quality assurance officers.
Service users could discuss any concerns or questions they had and also provide verbal
feedback. The officers spoke to many parents and carers during these sessions and directly
enabled 12 people to complete the questionnaire. Other service users said they had either
already completed the questionnaire or took a paper copy away to complete and return at a
later date. It is noted that the informal drop-in sessions coincided with the beginning of the
COVID-19 pandemic, and although the children centres remained open at this time,
attendance levels were lower than usual.
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
6 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
Details of the consultation and a web link to the online questionnaire were circulated
electronically to the individuals and organisations signed up to receive notification of the
Council’s consultations, which includes County Councillors; local MPs; District, Borough and
Parish Councils; and to all of the 1,000+ members of the county’s Residents’ Panel. The
consultation was also promoted to third sector organisations, health partners, and other
identified stakeholders.
The consultation was publicised via Northamptonshire County Council’s social media
accounts. Respondents were given the opportunity to participate through these social media
sites, although no direct responses were received or could be attributed via this method.
An email address was published to help respond to queries or receive feedback.
3. Summary of Feedback
This is a summary of the feedback received. It is recommended that it is read in conjunction
with the full consultation results, which can be found in the Appendix. All of the unredacted
feedback received has been shared with Children First Northamptonshire so all of the
responses received can be considered in their entirety.
A total of 458 questionnaire responses were received, generating feedback that included
some 303 comments from the different groups of respondents.
3.1. Questionnaire feedback
3.1.1. About the respondent
Respondents were asked what their main interest was in the consultation. A total of 440
respondents answered this question, with respondents being able to select one answer
option. The most frequent respondent type was parent and carers, with 60.4% selecting this
answer option, followed by Corby children’s centres members of staff (15.7%). The
respondents who identified themselves as ‘other’ listed several answers, some of which
were repetitions of the answer options presented. Those comments that were not already
presented included grandparents or other family members, retired professionals, former
employees, representatives of a charity, education workers, students, childminders, and
members/ trustees of a Community Interest Company.
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
7 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
Respondents were then asked in what capacity, if any, they had used Corby children’s centre
services within the last three years. In answering this question respondents were then
directed to the question set most relevant to them i.e. parent/carer or professional
respondents. A total of 259 (57.9%) respondents identified themselves as either a parent or
a carer, and when compared to the number of people accessing services this can be
considered a good response rate that infers robust statistics with regards to the feedback
received. A further 132 (29.5%) respondents identified themselves as a professional, and 56
(12.5%) respondents identified themselves as not using the service within the last three
years but still had an interest in participating in the consultation.
3.1.2 Parents/carers’ feedback
The following section is a summary of the questionnaire feedback provided by parents and
carers.
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
8 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
Respondents were asked if any of their children have a diagnosed disability. Of the 252
parent and carer respondents who answered this question 25 (9.9%) stated that at least one
of their children had a diagnosed disability.
These respondents were then asked to provide further information about the nature of the
disability. Although 25 respondents answered ‘Yes’ to the previous question a total of 31
respondents answered this question. A variety of disabilities were identified by respondents,
with Autism Spectrum Disorder being the most frequently mentioned, with nearly half of
respondents to this question (45.2%) selecting this answer option. This was followed by
learning disability (35.5%); and physical disability and global development delay (both
29.0%). The least selected answer option was sight impairment, with only one respondent
(3.2%) selecting this answer. 19.4% of respondents stated ‘other’, and said Down Syndrome,
Rett Syndrome, or that they were awaiting diagnosis or were unsure which box to tick.
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
9 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
Respondents were then asked which of the Corby Children’s Centre services they have used
within the last three years. Drop-in sessions and group sessions were by far the most
frequently accessed service, with 85.3% and 76.3% respectively of the 245 respondents who
answered this question selecting this option. The least accessed services were the volunteer
courses and volunteering (5.3%) and SEND groups (5.7%).
Parent and carer respondents were then asked to rank the services they had used in order of
their helpfulness, with one being the most helpful and seven being the least. If respondents
had not used a service they were asked not to rank it.
The online questionnaire was able to ensure respondents could only select one ranking for
each service, however, many of the respondents who completed the paper versions of this
questionnaire either did not fully understand the question or did not fully comply with the
instructions and ranked two or more of the services as number one or simply ticked several
of the answer options, and in doing so invalidated their response. As these incorrect answer
types were inconsistent with the many online responses and not inline with the purpose of
the question, we have had to exclude these incorrect responses to this specific question
from the paper questionnaire submissions within this analysis. However, where a paper
questionnaire respondent only ticked one response, we have taken that in good faith to
mean they give that service a ranking of one as the respondent indicated that they clearly
rated it above all others, so we have included these responses within this analysis.
There were a total of 153 valid responses to this question, and for the purpose of analysis,
each rank (i.e. 1st, 2nd, 3rd and so on down to 7th) has been allocated a weighting to signify
how important it is to the respondent, with weightings proportioned appropriately between
1st to 7th rankings.
When reviewing the number of respondents and the weightings given to each service, three
services were regarded as the most helpful by the respondents (i.e. the combined totals of
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
10 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
ranks 1st to 3rd). These were drop-in sessions (84.4%), group sessions (83.5%), and SEND
groups (83.1%). The following table lists the services in order of helpfulness.
Ranking (%)
1st to 3rd 4th 5th to 7th
Drop-in sessions 84.4% 11.9% 3.7%
Group sessions 83.5% 2.9% 13.6%
SEND groups 83.1% 0.0% 16.9%
1:1 sessions including Family Visiting 72.9% 4.4% 22.7%
Volunteer course and volunteering 71.7% 0.0% 28.3%
Information, advice and guidance services 70.7% 26.2% 3.1%
Training sessions/Adult Education 41.3% 16.9% 41.8%
However, this listing shifts slightly when reviewing just the 1st placed ranking answers, and
shows that although drop-in sessions, group sessions, and SEND groups are considered of
great help to respondents, when the 2nd and 3rd place rankings are removed and just the top
1st place rankings are analysed, then group sessions are clearly seen to be the biggest help to
parents and carers, as can be seen in the following table and graph which lists responses of
just the 1st placed rankings.
Ranking (%)
1st
Group sessions 59.6%
Drop-in sessions 41.5%
SEND groups 35.6%
1:1 sessions including Family Visiting 34.8%
Training sessions/Adult Education 23.0%
Volunteer course and volunteering 15.2%
Information, advice and guidance services 10.9%
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
11 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
When considering the number of respondents who answered this question, it should be
noted that although many have used and consider the group sessions (47 respondents) and
drop-in sessions (40 respondents) the most helpful service, a much larger proportion of
respondents (34) ranked drop-in sessions as the 2nd most helpful service, compared to group
sessions (17 respondents). 1:1 sessions were regarded by far as the least helpful service by
the majority, with 30 respondents ranking it in 7th place, compared to the next service
regarded as the least helpful (drop-in session) with just 6 respondents ranking this as 7th. Full
details of response rates can be viewed in the Appendix and the following graph
demonstrates all of the weighted rankings.
Respondents were asked which of the four Corby Children’s Centres they have used within
the last three years. There were 244 responses to this question, with Pen Green being
highlighted as the most frequently used by respondents, with 92.6% of respondents saying
they have accessed services at the centre. The least used was Woodnewton Learning
Community (16.8%).
It is recommended to the Commissioning Managers that the response rates to this question
is considered in relation to the known usage numbers of each centre.
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
12 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
When respondents were asked what time of the day is most suitable for them to use the
services, the majority preferred access during weekdays, with weekday mornings being the
preferred time, with 81.0% of the 237 respondents who answered this question saying this
was their preferred time. This was followed by weekday afternoons (65.0%). The least
popular time was weekday evenings, with a little under a quarter of respondents (23.6%)
preferring this time slot.
Respondents were then given a list of 14 subjects regarding the services provided and were
asked to rate them using a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is 'very dissatisfied' and 5 is 'very
satisfied'. For ease of completion the 14 subjects were split into two questions each listing
seven subjects. A total of 245 respondents answered these two questions. Many
respondents said that they were ‘very satisfied’ with all of the aspects of the services. The
aspect of the service the majority of parent/carer respondents were most satisfied with are
the skills and experience of the staff (97.5%).
The following table lists the aspects of the services in order of satisfaction, with the most
satisfied being at the top, and shows the combined percentage totals of satisfaction (i.e.
where the respondent answered 4 or 5) and dissatisfaction (rated 1 or 2). This is followed by
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
13 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
a graph showing all of the feedback, presented in the order it was asked on the
questionnaire.
Satisfied (%) Dissatisfied (%)
Skills and experience of staff 97.5% 1.7%
Quality of services 95.9% 1.7%
Access to information, advice and guidance 95.4% 2.9%
Access to resources 94.1% 3.3%
Access to universal and drop-in provision 94.1% 2.9%
Localness 93.4% 1.7%
Ability to access services without stigma 92.5% 2.1%
Ability to reduce isolation 91.9% 3.0%
Signposting to more specialised services 86.4% 3.4%
Range of services available 86.0% 2.9%
Flexibility of opening times 85.1% 4.1%
Access to support services e.g. Citizen's Advice
Bureau 79.6% 5.4%
Training and Adult Education opportunities 78.4% 3.9%
Access to translators and interpreters 78.3% 4.7%
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
14 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
Parent and Carer respondents were then invited to provide any other comments which they
would like to make about Corby Children’s Centre Services. There were 131 responses
submitted which covered a range of subject areas. In common was consistent statements
about the children’s centres services being vital and essential; that they were thankful for
having the centres, and in the case of Corby as a place, the Pen Green Centre is cited as
being of necessity and is part of the fabric of Corby and the community.
Respondents expressed their own personal experiences by giving examples of support
received. They mentioned issues of safeguarding support, the value of the staff and the
range of services and activities on offer, and the chance to meet others in similar situations.
Respondents felt that the centre that they use provided great opportunities for them and
their children and wider families. Some said that the services on offer helped them
understand and learn parenting skills which they had not experienced from their own
parents. They were helped with varied support i.e. breastfeeding, play, and in particular,
parents with low self- esteem or those who were vulnerable were assisted with specific
support often not available elsewhere.
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
15 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
It was felt that children of all ages benefited from the bespoke intervention or from support
of the group work being offered. Together as a family i.e. a whole family approach, they
were able to explore and learn new skills and coping mechanisms in a non- judgemental
manner. This in turn, respondents said, built confidence and life management strategies.
Young parents and isolated parents in particular felt able to access specific support i.e.
counselling, feeding, educational skills etc which aided them as parents. Specific support for
newly arrived families into the country was also mentioned as important.
Respondents said that the staff and professionals were good at listening and understanding
their needs. They considered them to be knowledgeable, helpful, adaptable and supportive.
Some respondents described the staff as “amazing” and “a credit to the centre and the
Council”.
Respondents stated that children’s centres were a safe and welcoming place where
invaluable services were being offered, and this was reflected in their children wanting and
liking to come to the centres. Respondents valued opportunities that first time parents were
given in talking to other people with similar experience, for example peer to peer support.
Respondents made specific references to centres being vital to providing mental health and
wellbeing services. They mentioned the significance of the centres in their mental health
recovery work, such as the work provided to help people with managing their post-natal
depression recovery. Respondents stated that the children’s centre services provide them
with reassurance in their parenting and family wellbeing, which in turn saved lives.
When mentioning SEND support services, respondents were strongly advocating the need
for the centre, for the specialist support provided and for the range of professionals
available to them.
Respondents also mentioned other services which they and their children enjoyed. This
included baby massage, messy play, and drop in services.
Respondents cited the uniqueness of the Centres and said similar support was not available
in other areas of the county. Respondents commented on the sense of privilege they felt in
having access to children centres like these. A few respondents travelled to the centres from
Kettering and other places from the county in order to access activities which were not
available in their locality.
Respondents said the centres also give a chance for parents and children to socialise and
make friends. Often, respondents said that they experienced isolation and the centres gave a
place for them and their children to meet others and to belong to an extended support
network.
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
16 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
Some respondents took the opportunity to highlight gaps or possible improvements in
service provision. They suggested:
Changes in opening hours including opening on weekends, and or into late evening
and / or in the school holidays.
Increasing the range of groups on offer.
Access to more educational toys.
Developing specific groups aimed at certain cohorts, i.e. for fathers or for partners.
Organising more regular meetings with advice agencies such as Citizen’s Advice.
Improving the timings allocated to services i.e. increasing length of time; time of day
for the activity etc.
Developing more services for children with additional needs.
Creating more services for children aged under one.
Developing a booking facility i.e. to secure place at a session.
Developing more capacity for a dynamic mental health service which includes an
increase in trained mental health workers, an increase in the availability of mental
health specialist clinicians; and creating more mental health space areas within the
centre i.e. a crisis café.
Comments also referred to the central government’s responses to COVID 19 and the
negative effect this may be having on vulnerable families. They said that some people may
not meet the central government’s defined eligibility definition. They felt that the NCC has a
responsibility to help meet the welfare, wellbeing and safety needs of those borderline
vulnerable families at a time of national crisis.
Respondents also commented on NCC’s financial management and the services provided in
the children centres being under pressure to continuously having to provide more services
for less. A few said that children’s centres needed more resources and staff in order to offer
more services. They felt that services in some areas needed to be extended to children who
were five years old or older. They explained that children’s centres were a lifeline for
vulnerable families who have multiple and multifaceted needs and so flexibility needs to be
built-in for families with complex needs and requirements whose children reach the age
thresholds.
Some respondents said they welcomed the new unitary councils that would replace NCC.
The below WordCloud demonstrates the most frequent words respondents mentioned
whilst answering the above question:
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
17 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
Parent and carer respondents were asked to provide their postcode to help us gain an
understanding of where respondents live. A total of 194 valid postcodes were submitted,
including four from out of the county. We have not provided further details within this
report to ensure respondents’ anonymity is retained but have shared this data with Children
First Northamptonshire. However, the below LSOA (Lower Layer Super Output Area
boundaries) map helps to demonstrate respondents’ locations from within the county, and
demonstrates that the majority of respondents live within the Corby area, with some
travelling from further afield in order to access the services.
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
18 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
3.1.3 Professionals’ feedback
The following section is a summary of the questionnaire feedback provided by professionals.
As mentioned in section 2 of this report, the professional question responses that were
clearly incorrectly answered by parents/carers have been excluded from this analysis.
Professional respondents were asked, on average, how many times they had made a referral
to Corby Children's Centre services per year within the last three years. Of the 121 valid
responses to this question, the majority of professionals (59.5%) said they have made an
average of more than ten referrals per year within the last three years.
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
19 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
As with parents and carers, professional respondents were given a list of 14 subjects
regarding the services provided and were asked to rate them using a scale of 1 to 5, where 1
is 'very dissatisfied' and 5 is 'very satisfied'. As mentioned above, the 14 subjects were split
into two questions each listing seven subjects. A total of 123 professional respondents
answered these two questions. Many respondents said that they were ‘very satisfied’ with
all aspects of the services. As with parents and carers’ responses, the aspect of the service
the majority of professional respondents were most satisfied with are the skills and
experience of the staff (99.2%); they also regarded the quality of services as highly (99.2%).
Six of out of the top seven services professionals were satisfied with also appeared within
the top seven services listed by parents/carers, with the only exception being the ability to
reduce isolation, which was placed eighth by parents/carers and third by professionals.
The following table lists the aspects of the services in order of satisfaction, with the most
satisfied being at the top, and shows the combined percentage totals of satisfaction (i.e.
where the respondent answered 4 or 5) and dissatisfaction (rated 1 or 2). This is followed by
a graph showing all of the feedback in the order it was presented on the questionnaire.
Satisfied (%) Dissatisfied (%)
Skills and experience of staff 99.2% 0.0%
Quality of services 99.2% 0.0%
Ability to reduce isolation 97.5% 0.8%
Access to information, advice and guidance 97.5% 0.0%
Access to resources 95.8% 0.0%
Localness 95.8% 0.0%
Ability to access services without stigma 95.0% 0.8%
Signposting to more specialised services 95.0% 0.0%
Access to universal and drop-in provision 93.3% 1.7%
Training and Adult Education opportunities 89.7% 0.9%
Flexibility of opening times 89.1% 0.8%
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
20 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
Range of services available 88.2% 0.8%
Access to support services e.g. Citizen's Advice
Bureau 81.1% 2.7%
Access to translators and interpreters 64.5% 10.3%
Professional respondents were then invited to provide any other comments which they
would like to make about Corby Children’s Centre Services. There were 60 responses
submitted. Many of the respondents commented about Pen Green and its work for families
and children in Corby.
All the comments were positive about the importance of children’s centres to children and
families. They said the centres make a difference to families, providing early help and
support which is essential for the whole family. They said children centres are family focused
and make an enormous contribution to the lives of many, especially those families and
people who are vulnerable and/or awaiting assessment or diagnosis of conditions such as
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
21 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
SEN etc. Professional respondents said that the services were brilliant and gave families long
term support.
Respondents stated that the services provided were a lifeline and that children’s centres are
a vital hub for the community. They felt they provided good resources in a safe, stimulating
and welcoming environment and are crucial places for children and families to play, learn
and socialise together.
Professional respondents appreciated that children’s centres are also available for partner
organisations to use and therefore enable much needed local and national support services
to be taken directly to the population e.g. NHS clinics; breastfeeding etc.
Respondents stated that staff had a wealth of knowledge and experience. They said that
staff were professional, were good advocates, and were dedicated and kind. They
considered staff to be specialists in their field and provided good guidance and were able to
signpost effectively to other services in the public, voluntary and private sector.
Some of the respondents said that they valued the opportunity to refer, network and liaise
with the range of professionals who use the Centres. They felt this helps staff and
professionals to strive and have passion for the services. Respondents added that staff
attitude and motivation is positive which translated into better, more proactive services and
advice for vulnerable people with multi-faceted issues and concerns.
Many of the professional respondents commented about the specific services provided i.e.
perinatal mental health services; resources for pregnant and postnatal women in Corby.
They said that these services were best provided within children’s centres settings. Others
valued the opportunity for professionals to hold confidential family discussions there.
Respondents said the children’s centres service was a “gem” and was unique within
Northamptonshire. They said that Pen Green was recognised as a place of excellence where
it was possible to gain qualifications. It provides good national and international training and
research opportunities, which in turn ensures staff are highly qualified and motivated.
A few respondents highlighted the issues children’s centres have experienced as the
outcome of gradual reductions in funding. As a result of financial constraints, they felt fewer
universal services/ prevention services are available. Respondents said that the variety of
drop-in services open to all have been cut or lost altogether. However, respondents did
point out that the services that are currently provided continue to be of good quality. They
further added that if the services were not available than there would be an increase or
strain in other areas of public services which would need to pick up long term issues, i.e. the
children’s centres provide distinctive prevention services which aided savings to the overall
public purse.
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
22 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
Other gaps and issues that respondents said are that they felt staff at the Centres are often
standing in for other shortages in social care and health provision; and that funding
reductions are making it harder to support families in need as services have been
continuously depleting.
Professional respondents said that service user feedback is used to develop the service. This
they said helps to evolve the services on offer by making them still of relevance to children
and their families.
The below WordCloud demonstrates the most frequent words respondents mentioned
whilst answering the above question:
Similar to parents and carers, professional respondents were asked to provide their work
postcode to help us gain an understanding of where organisational respondents are based. A
total of 103 valid postcodes were submitted, including two from out of the county. As with
parent/carer responses, we have not provided further details within this report to ensure
respondents’ anonymity is retained but have shared this data with Children First
Northamptonshire. However, the below map helps to demonstrate respondents’ locations
from within the county, and demonstrates that the majority of professional respondents are
based within the Corby area.
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
23 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
3.1.4 Feedback from other interested parties
The following section is a summary of the questionnaire feedback provided by those
respondents who said they had not used Corby Children's Centre Services within the last
three years as either a parent, carer or in a professional capacity.
Whilst the consultation was focused on those individuals and organisations that either
currently have or have had a direct relationship with the Corby Children’s Centre services
within the last three years, feedback from interested parties who wished to share their views
was also welcomed. These respondents were provided with an open question that invited
them to share any comments they would like to make. A total of 24 respondents provided
comment. Respondents who made comments were, on the whole, referring to the Pen
Green Centre.
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
24 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
These respondents consistently said the Centre was a beacon of excellence and a “gem” for
preventative and multi-agency work in childcare services. They said that it was a powerful
and vital tool for supporting families with complex family circumstances. Again, these
respondents described the service as a lifeline and made comments that it was a duty of the
Council to provide such children the best start in life and felt it was imperative that the
Council should retain such an outstanding service. Some respondents suggested that the
Council should be making more of an investment in the centres. Respondents also said that
children’s centres were well placed to divert the strain away from other more acute public
services i.e. the Council or the NHS. A few respondents said that the centres were the
operating heart of the community and were the “eyes that keep children safe”.
Respondents expressed that the services offered were to the most isolated and vulnerable
members of the community and if this was to be removed, then they felt there would be a
huge gap in services. A respondent commented that there were ways to introduce a sliding
scale of charging for services if required with no charges for those families who are referred.
Another respondent said that children’s experience and use of services would then put them
into a better position to transition with confidence into education. A respondent also
commented that the children’s centre provides real promises of long term improvements i.e.
over a 10 to 20 year period, to the social and educational achievement of children and their
families. Another said that services such as breastfeeding services are essential and need to
continue.
A few respondents said that the staff were fantastic and were highly skilled and devoted in
their work. They thought staff acted in a professional manner, displaying courage and
honesty. They also made reference to the volunteers who supported the services as being of
great value too.
A respondent said that they were impressed by the website and the excellent support the
centre offered. Another they said that they had no experience of the centre but they would
like to try it.
The below WordCloud demonstrates the most frequent words respondents mentioned
whilst answering the above question:
Consultation on Children’s Centre Targeted Support Services in Corby 2020 – Analysis Report
25 Consultation, Equalities and Accessibility Team v1.0
3.1.5 Demographic information
Equalities monitoring questions were asked of parent and carer questionnaire respondents,
although not all respondents chose to complete this section of the questionnaire.
From the available completed responses, the vast majority of the individual respondents
were female (97.0%). The most frequent age given by respondents were those aged
between 20 to 49 years (94.0%). A little over one in five (21.6%) respondents were either
currently pregnant or had had a baby within the last 6 months. A total of 45.2% of
respondents were married; with 19.7% co-habiting / living together; 2.6% in a civil
partnership; and 28.1% being single.
Other identified equality monitoring information provided by respondents demonstrated
that 21.1% were disabled, with mental health being highlighted as the most frequent
disability and mentioned by 93.1% of respondents who listed a disability. The most frequent
religion identified was Christian at 36.2% with 43.4% of respondents choosing ‘None’ and
16.6% selecting ‘Prefer not to say’. Predominantly respondents identified themselves as
either White British (85.7%) or White Other (10.0%), with 3.5% saying they were from
another ethnic background.
Full statistics of the responses is available within the Appendix.