Construction and Energy Costs for Radiant System in ......• Demand controlled ventilation in large...
Transcript of Construction and Energy Costs for Radiant System in ......• Demand controlled ventilation in large...
TRCcompanies.com
[RESILIENT]INTEGRATED
SUSTAINABLE
Symposium: Optimizing Radiant Systems
Oct 23, 2019
Construction and Energy Costs for Radiant System in California Bay Area
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Acknowledgements• This work was done when the presenter worked at Taylor Engineering with
support from Hwakong Cheng and Steve Taylor
• This study was funded by California Energy Commission Electric Program Investment Charge (EPIC) under the Optimizing Radiant Systems for Energy Efficiency and Comfort project, led by Center for the Built Environment at UC Berkeley
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
• Project overview
• Case study building
• Cost data
• How to reduce construction costs
• Energy performance
• How to reduce energy costs
Agenda
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Objectives§ Provide cost data for radiant systems in California Bay Area§ Suggest opportunities to reduce cost and improve energy
efficiency
Approach§ Provide baseline and alternative design options § Cost estimation by contractors§ Energy performance evaluation by EnergyPlus
Project Overview
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
BackgroundStatus of VAV § Predominant HVAC approach
• Optimized construction process• Competitive market
§ Design guidelines• Advanced VAV System Design Guide• ASHRAE Guideline 36
Status of radiant § Small market share, mostly in low-energy and ZNE projects
§ Limited design guidelines and tools
§ Lack of familiarity by building construction industry
Image: an online map of radiant system buildings
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Real building with radiant designSimplified floor plan§ Open office with meeting rooms§ Total floor area 112,000 ft2
Building features§ Solar load control
• Window-wall ratio 40%• Glazing U-value 0.4 and SHGC 0.28• Exterior overhang
§ LED lights and daylight control§ Advanced plug load control
Case study building
Image: EnergyPlus model of the case building
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Radiant slab design
• High thermal mass radiant system with tubes in every ceiling slab
• 10 radiant zones per typical floor
• 13 DOAS VAV zones per typical floor
• Demand controlled ventilation in large conference rooms
Radiant slab zoning plan (part of typical floor) DOAS zoning plan (part of typical floor)
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Radiant system designDedicated outdoor air system (DOAS)§ Design air flowrate
19,400 cfm§ Changeover
heating/cooling coil
Central plant § Four-pipe air source
heat pump § Serves both DOAS and
radiant slabs to reduce cost
Radiant design schematic
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Construction costsHVAC and controls only
Common mechanical elements NOT included
San Mateo labor rate• Sheet metal: $123/hr• Piping: $118/hr
Results§ Average : $38.9/ft2
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Construction cost breakdown
44% of total cost
20% of total cost
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Piping labor breakdown
Radiant slab: $6.6/ ft2
Floor distribution + risers: $2.9/ ft2
Radiant slab ($6.59 / 46%)
Terminals ($1.25 / 9%)
Floor Distribution ($1.91 / 13%)
Roof Equipment ($1.19 / 8%)
Risers ($0.98 / 7%)
Miscellaneous ($2.27 / 16%)
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Equipment Cost
Radiant equipment: $2.82/ ft2
DOAS AHU : $0.79/ ft2
ASHP: $2.71/ ft2
AHU ($0.79 /11.5%)
ASHP ($2.71 /39.0%)
Radiant tubes/mats ($2.82 /40.7%)
VAV/Dampers ($0.21 /3.1%)
Hydronic ($0.25 /3.6%)
Grilles ($0.14 /2.1%)
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Impact of labor rate
• National average labor rate: $85/hr
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Facilitate the use of radiant mat
Costs§ Mats : ~$4 - 6 /ft2
§ Loops*: ~$6 - 8 /ft2
Limitations for mats§ Maybe limited by shape and size
of radiant zones§ May not be cost effective for
smaller jobs (assembled on a made-to-order basis)
* For 6-inch tube spacing
Radiant roll-out mat
Traditional loops
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Hydronic distribution layout: Multiple risers vs. single riser
§ Strategically locate risers to minimize piping: 30% piping reduction§ Cost savings: $2.5/ft2
Multiple risers: Typical floor piping layoutSingle riser: Typical floor piping layout
Single HW/CHW riser
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Use larger radiant tube spacing: 9” vs. 6 in”
§ Loop design: ~$1.7/ft2 of labor cost savings § Mat design : 5-15% cost savings and 5% labor savings§ Thermal capacity: initial evaluation shows similar dynamic
performance
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Other approaches to reduce radiant costs
§ Large vs. small radiant zones§ Consider no radiant tubes in ground or roof slab § Use passive supplemental system strategically (For example, ceiling
fans)§ Hydronic system type: 4-pipe vs. 2-pipe vs. mixed 4 and 2-pipes § Reduce central plant equipment size with load shifting § More details in the report*
*Feng, J., & Cheng, H. (2018). Comparison of Construction and Energy Costs for Radiant vs. VAV Systems in the California Bay Area. Deliverable for California Energy Commission Project EPIC -14-009, Taylor Engineering. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/13h9z4gg
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
1.2
0.50.2
1.0
2.9
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
HeatPumpCooling HeatPumpHeating Pump Fan Total
HVA
C An
nual
Site
Ene
rgy
Use
(kBt
u/ft
2 )
HVAC annual site electricity
Total: 2.9 kBtu/ft2
§ Cooling is 41% of total energy§ Fan energy is 34% of total energy
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Central plant cooling and heating load• Cooling energy use in winter months• DOAS uses significant energy
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Aver
age
Out
door
Tem
pera
ture
(°F)
Plan
t Hea
ting/
Cool
ing
Load
(kBt
u/ft
2 )
Month
Radiant Slab _heat DOAS_heat Radiant Slab _cool DOAS_cool Monthly Ave OADB
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Potential for economizer to reduce cooling energy
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
06/1524:00:00
06/1612:00:00
06/1624:00:00
06/1712:00:00
06/1724:00:00
06/1812:00:00
06/1824:00:00
Tem
pera
ture
(°F)
Plan
t Coo
ling
Load
(kBt
u/hr
)
Radiant_DOAS Radiant_Slab OADB DOAS SAT
Potential full airside economizer hours
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Implement load shifting strategy to reduce demand
Radiant slab operates 6 am - 6 pm
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
09/0724:00:00
09/0812:00:00
09/0824:00:00
09/0912:00:00
09/0924:00:00
09/1012:00:00
09/1024:00:00
Ou
tdo
or
Tem
pe
ratu
re (
°F)
Bu
ild
ing
Co
oli
ng
Rat
e (B
tu/h
r)Th
ou
san
ds
Radiant_DOAS Radiant_Slab OADB
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
09/0724:00:00
09/0812:00:00
09/0824:00:00
09/0912:00:00
09/0924:00:00
09/1012:00:00
09/1024:00:00
Ou
tdo
or
Tem
per
atu
re (
°F)
Bui
ldin
g Co
olin
g R
ate
(Btu
/hr)
Thou
sand
s
Radiant_DOAS Radiant_Slab OADB
Radiant slab operates 0 am-12 pm
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Implement load shifting strategy to reduce demand
- Whole building electricity cost- High performance design to minimize heat gain is key
1.06 1.071.12
1.17 1.14
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
0am-10am 2am-10pm 6am-12pm 6am-18pm 0am-23pm
Annu
al B
uild
ing
Ener
gy C
ost($
/ft2 )
Radiant run at different operation periods
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Optimize DOAS supply air temperature control
Neutral SAT
Large deadband
OA reset
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Optimize DOAS supply air temperature control§ Use large heating/cooling setpoint deadband§ Reset supply air temperature higher with space humidity
feedback
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Deadband Single Setpoint Constantat 68 F
Site
HVA
C En
ergy
Use
(kBt
u/ft
2 )
HeatPumpCooling HeatPumpHeating Pump Fan
Traditional controlReset with large deadband
© TRC Companies, Inc. All rights reserved
Approaches to reduce energy cost§ Take advantage of free cooling with waterside economizer ( mild
weather in particular )§ Implement load shifting strategy to reduce demand charge and
equipment size§ DOAS design and control are critical
o DOAS supply air temperature control is IMPORTANTo Avoid unnecessary oversizing of DOAS by strategically distributing
the ventilation air o Decouple cooling source for radiant slab and DOAS in humid
climates§ More details in the report*
There are opportunities for improving current practice!
*Feng, J., & Cheng, H. (2018). Comparison of Construction and Energy Costs for Radiant vs. VAV Systems in the California Bay Area. Deliverable for California Energy Commission Project EPIC -14-009, Taylor Engineering. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/13h9z4gg