Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

39
Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance Michael G. Avraam Global Product Manager - Containment ChargePoint Technology Tuesday 24 th June

description

“High Containment Powder Handling - Considerations for Reducing Risk and Increasing Performance” provides insights for end users on how to increase the containment performance at their facilities by utilising the latest containment technology available.

Transcript of Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

Page 1: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

Michael G. AvraamGlobal Product Manager - ContainmentChargePoint TechnologyTuesday 24th June

Page 2: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

REDUCING RISK

HAZARDOUS PHARMACEUTICAL SUBSTANCES

• Personal exposure• Environmental contamination• Product cross contamination

Page 3: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

DEFINITION OF HPAPI

What is a…High potency Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (HPAPI) ?

Page 4: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

CONTAINMENT PHILOSOPHY

Relatively harmful, but

low risk

Use of goodwork practices

and general ventilation

Moderate risk skin, eye and

respiratory tract irritation

Use of Local Exhaust and Ventilation (LEV)

and appropriate Personal Protection

Equipment (PPE)

High risksuspected

carcinogenic

Improved PPE and/or

containment process

Irreversible effects DNA, mutagenicity and chromosomal

damage

Higher level containment

systems. Minimal human intervention

Page 5: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

REDUCING THE RISK OF EXPOSURE

“There is no quick and easysolution to the problem”

Page 6: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRIMARY LEVEL RISK REDUCTION

Recommendations to reduce risk

• Contain airborne risk at source• Avoid reliance on Standard Operating Procedures (S.O.P.’s)• Containment system selection• Targeting level of design performance• Introducing a secondary barrier• Reducing reliance on PPE• Other considerations

Page 7: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

DETAILED CONSIDERATIONS

Having established risk potential, need toIdentify other process considerations

Page 8: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

DETAILED CONSIDERATIONS

• Product toxicity (OEL)

Page 9: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

DETAILED CONSIDERATIONS

• Flammability

Page 10: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

DETAILED CONSIDERATIONS

• Material Type

Page 11: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

DETAILED CONSIDERATIONS

• Process

Page 12: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

DETAILED CONSIDERATIONS

• Potency

Page 13: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

DETAILED CONSIDERATIONS

• Quantity - What is the total quantity being handled

Page 14: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

DETAILED CONSIDERATIONS

• Task & Duration - What is the process task and the actual activity taking place

Page 15: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

DETAILED CONSIDERATIONS

• Intervention - The level of operator involvement and risk to operator

Page 16: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

DETAILED CONSIDERATIONS

• Operator – Fully trained and adherence to Standard Operating Procedures – S.O.P’s

Page 17: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

CONTAINMENT SOLUTION SELECTION

• Level of risk• Detailed considerations• Containment solution analysis and selection

Page 18: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

WHAT TYPE OF CONTAINMENT SOLUTION?

• Cleanrooms • PPE (Personal Protection Equipment)• LEV (Local Exhaust Ventilation)

Page 19: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

WHAT TYPE OF CONTAINMENT SOLUTION?

• Flexible containment

Page 20: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

WHAT TYPE OF CONTAINMENT SOLUTION?

• Downflow Booths

Page 21: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

WHAT TYPE OF CONTAINMENT SOLUTION?

• Flexible Isolators

Page 22: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

WHAT TYPE OF CONTAINMENT SOLUTION?

• Rigid Isolators

Page 23: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

WHAT TYPE OF CONTAINMENT SOLUTION?

• Powder Transfer Systems

Page 24: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

WHAT TYPE OF CONTAINMENT SOLUTION?

• Split butterfly valves

Page 25: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

WHAT TYPE OF CONTAINMENT SOLUTION?

Focusing on Split Butterfly Valve Technology

Page 26: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

UTILISING A SPLIT BUTTERFLY VALVEAS THE CONTAINMENT SOLUTION

General Composition

• Active – Normally fitted to process• Passive – Normally fitted to product IBC or Bag

Page 27: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

SPLIT VALVE OPERATION PRINCIPLE

Active &

Passive Disc

OPEN / CLOSE

Active and Passive

UNLOCK

and Passive

UNDOCK

Passive

& Active

DOCKING

Active and

Passive

LOCK

Page 28: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

TYPICAL APPLICATIONS FOR SPLITBUTTERFLY VALVES

• Dispensing• Reactor / Vessel Charging• Nutsche Filter dryer discharge• HSM / Granulator charging & discharging• Mill / Sieve charging & discharging• Compression machine charging• Encapsulation machine charging

Page 29: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

INCREASING CONTAINMENT PERFORMANCE

General approach and options towards improvingcontainment performance with split butterfly valves

Page 30: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

INCREASING CONTAINMENT PERFORMANCE

• S.O.P’s Enhanced S.O.P procedures

Page 31: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

INCREASING CONTAINMENT PERFORMANCE

• Contamination removal by local extraction

Page 32: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

INCREASING CONTAINMENT PERFORMANCE

• Contamination removal by integral extraction

Page 33: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

INCREASING CONTAINMENT PERFORMANCE

• Contamination and residue rinsing

Rinsing SolutionIntroductionRinsing Solution

Recovery

Page 34: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

INCREASING CONTAINMENT PERFORMANCE

• Secondary barrier

Page 35: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

INCREASING CONTAINMENT PERFORMANCE

• Provision of accessories by integration whilst maintaining containment

Page 36: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

INCREASING CONTAINMENT PERFORMANCE

• Preventative maintenance

Page 37: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

OVERVIEW

• Understanding the risk• Identify the process• Target the containment performance• Establish the appropriate solution• Minimise reliance on PPE• Familiarise the users• Integration and correct installation• Rigorous training and monitoring• Maintenance

Page 38: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

OVERVIEW

SUCCESS

Page 39: Considerations for reducing risk and increasing containment performance

Follow us

Michael G. [email protected]

Thank youAny Questions?