Conservation Efforts and Economic Feasibility of Preserving Clematis socialis
-
Upload
amena-hanson -
Category
Documents
-
view
37 -
download
0
description
Transcript of Conservation Efforts and Economic Feasibility of Preserving Clematis socialis
Conservation Efforts and Economic Feasibility of
Preserving Clematis socialis
Courtney Holt
May 1, 2005
Status
Endangered
Threats
Management effortsSpecies recovery plan (USFWS)
Increasing population sizesBoyd and Hilton (1994)
Tissue Culturing
Collection of plant tissue
Grown on mediaHormones
Nutrients
Sugars
Undefined constituents
Acclimation
Shoot Growth
103 shoot and flower bud samples collected on March 16, 2000
Growth media0.5 mg/l BAP, 0.5 mg/l NAA
Antibiotics
Removal of NAA and increase in BAP to 1.0 mg/l increased shoot production
Root Growth
Cultures with successful shoots transferred to medium with 0.5mg/l IBASome transferred to hormone-free media
50% rooting
Some left on 0.5IBA media
62% rooting
Acclimation
80 mm terra cotta pots
1:1 sand soil mixture
Covered with clear plastic cups
Plants remained small ex vitro
Potential reintroduction
Further Efforts at Root Growth
Decrease in rooting success with .5IBA WP
Plants taken from all 17 lines and placed on either
.5IBA WP (38 plants)
.5IBA 1/2WP (37 plants)
Shoot height recorded
Methods of Valuation
Use values
Passive-use valuesOption value
Existence value
Combinations of these values typically motivate preservation
Contingent Valuation
Directly places value on resource, species, etc.
People are asked their willingness to pay contingent on a hypothetical scenario
Surveys
4 survey typesBlack and white picture
Color picture
In-state
Only in Alabama
Open-ended question
Total Payment Projections
Willingness to pay extrapolated using US population (18 years and older)$6,485 spent by CREW per year on C. socialis
Conclusions
Conservation efforts appear to have support for C. socialis
Support for larger variety of species?
More extensive surveys necessary