The Ecomorph Concept in Conodont Biostratigraphy W. Britt Leatham CSU San Bernardino.
Conodont
Transcript of Conodont
Late Devonian – Early Carboniferous conodonts of deepwater deposits
Laboratory of stratigraphy
Author Plotitsyn
A.N.Scientific supervisor D.Sc.(Geol.& Min.) Beznosova T.M.
Institute of GeologyKomi Science Center
Ural Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Keywords
Conodonts – конодонты
Deepwater deposits – глубоководные отложения
Agnatha - бесчелюстные
Annelids - кольчатые черви
Nematode worms - круглые черви
Clams - двустворчатые моллюски
Arthropoda - членистоногие
Coelenterates - кишечнополостные
Seaweed - морские водоросли
Logbook - полевой дневник
Conodonts – who are they?
Reconstructions of the conodont animal
Conodontassemblage
Different conodont elements
(A) Dorsal view of the reconstructed, closed apparatus of Novispathodus.(B) Orientation of the apparatus within the conodont’s head
Each organism had a set of morphologically distinct conodont elements
Christian Heinrich Pander (1794–1865), first researcher of conodonts.
First described by Christian H. Pander in 1859 from clays near St. Petersburg, Russia. He originally thought that they were a variety of small fish teeth. Afterwards there were a lot of different hypotheses concerning conodonts. For example: - agnatha;- annelids;- nematode worms;- clams; - arthropoda; - coelenterate; - seaweed; and etc. By the early 70s only two hypotheses were considered to be the most probable which substantiate the propinquity between conodonts and polychaeta worms and chordates.
Relevance
Upper Devonian and Lower Carboniferous conodonts are widespread at the Urals and in the matter of biota abundance and stratigraphic completeness play a great role for fauna evolution, patterns cognition, biostratigraphy issues clarification, regional and international zonal scales correlation and also for bounds delimitation between Devon and Carbon. At the research area deep facies deposits are poorly characterized by faunal remains. Conodonts are one of the main groups of fauna which is suitable for biostratigraphy and correlation of Upper Devonian and Lower Carboniferous sediments. Their geographical spread and fast evolution give us an opportunity to compare researched deep-water sections with standard and basic different facies sections on a regional, interregional and even intercontinental level. Conodont sequence creation for this very facial type of sediments within North Urals region is necessary to determine the level of regional boundary between Devon and Carbon.
The main objective of the research is to investigate conodonts of the Devonian (Famennian) and Carboniferous (Tournaisian) deposits. For the objective achievement the following tasks should be solved:
• Consider systematic composition of the conodont fauna and conduct biofacial analysis.
• Discover zonal conodont sequence in deepwater sediments and reveal the location of the bound between Devon and Carbon.
• Identify the boundaries of regional events and a scope of a Hangenberg global geological event (HGGE) in Subpolar and Polar Urals sections.
Fieldwork Page from logbook
Carbonate deposits
Scanning electron microscope
Binocular microscope
Franke chambers
Tectonic map of basin of the river Kozhim
Geological scheme of the middle reaches of the river Syvyu
Conodonts of Syvyu River section
1. Polygnathus - 12 species and subspecies (Pic. 3, 4, 5, 6, 17, 18, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27)
2. Palmatolepis - 6 species and subspecies (Pic. 1, 8, 9, 10)
3. Pseudopolygnathus - 4 species (Pic. 13, 21)
4. Bispathodus - 3 species and subspecies (Pic. 14, 20)
5. Branmehla - 2 species (Pic. 12 и 15)
6. Siphonodella - 2 species (Pic. 19 и 26)
7. Mehlina -1 species (Pic. 11)8. Hindeodus - 1 species 9. Pseudognathodus - 1
species10. Bizignathus - 1 species
(Pic. 7)11. Rhodalepis - 1 species (Pic.
16)
Boundary of the Devonian and Carboniferous systems and stratigraphic equivalents of Hangenberg shale
Thank you forattention!