CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING...

17
CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM

Transcript of CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING...

Page 1: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

C O N N E C T I N G H O U G H T O N M I F F L I N A N D T H E N E W C O M M O N C O R E W R I T I N G S T A N D A R D S

CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM

Page 2: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

LOOKING AT THE RESEARCHCONNECTING READING AND WRITING

Page 3: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

CONNECTING READING AND WRITING

• In a literacy classroom, reading, writing, and critical thinking should be connected in order to enhance learning, especially in the content area to increase student’s motivation and engage the learner.

• One Minute Reflection: What is your opinion on this statement? Do you agree or disagree?

Page 4: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

CONNECTING READING AND WRITING CONTINUED

• Literacy has traditionally been described as the ability to read for knowledge, write coherently and think critically about printed material. (Wikipedia)

• According to Leu (1994), “Reading and writing, when

combined in classroom experiences, can be used as powerful tools to increase students’ ability to analyze and think critically about information. Separately, both reading and writing develop critical thinking skills but when combined, they serve to reinforce each other and produce even greater benefits than if they are used alone.”

Page 5: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

LOOKING AT THE RESEARCHUSING AUTHENTIC CONTENT

Page 6: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

USING AUTHENTIC CONTENT

• You often hear how students up to a certain grade, usually around grade 3, stop learning to read and begin to read to learn. Because many students are being taught how to read and write in separate settings and without much context, they have a difficult time reading and writing for a purpose.

• Share your thoughts……. What are you doing in your classroom? Are you teaching reading and writing at separate times?

Page 7: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

USING AUTHENTIC CONTENT CONTINUED

• When students are given time to read and write for authentic purposes, “…. they move from ideas, to composing a message, to searching for ways to record their messages while monitoring their message production. Children need to become both author and audience by giving and receiving genuine responses that value their voices and choices. Through these interactions, they express themselves and construct identities.” (Anderson & Briggs, 2001)

Page 8: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

LOOKING AT THE RESEARCHMOTIVATING AND ENGAGING STUDENTS

Page 9: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

MOTIVATING AND ENGAGING STUDENTS

• When literacy activities are combined, students can interact with the literature and become more motivated and engaged in the content and are able to think more critically about the content.

• In one study it was found that “…children’s literature created meaningful writing assignments and provided opportunities to share, which in turn fostered student motivation to write. The conclusion of this intervention resulted in students who gained confidence in their ideas and beliefs through the sharing of meaningful writing.” (Daly & Sharko, 2010)

Page 10: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

MOTIVATING AND ENGAGING STUDENTS CONTINUED

• “Their writings permit them to share their personal understanding regarding a wide range of literature in various cultural contexts that inform, clarify, explain, or educate them about our remarkable human family. For many students, their written commentaries affirm the progress of their learning across the curriculum.” (Montgomery, 2001)

• When students are able to feel confident in their literacy

skills, they are more likely to practice independently. Practice will help students become more fluent in the processes of reading, writing, and thinking critically. When students become fluent in the processes, they will become more motivated and engaged in the classroom.

Page 11: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

RESEARCH INTO PRACTICELOOKING AT CHARLES COUNTY

Page 12: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

READING PROGRAM: HOUGHTON MIFFLIN

• Houghton Mifflin provides different themes, at each grade level, that teachers can incorporate different writing activities into to make the reading and writing more authentic for the students.

Page 13: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

WRITING STANDARDS:COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS

• In the Common Core State Standards document, it explains the integrated model that they focused on as they developed the standards. It discusses how closely connected the processes of literacy; reading, writing, speaking, and listening are.

• Charles County is pushing for teachers to start using the writing standards now in order to prepare for when the state requires us to use them.

Page 14: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

READING/WRITING OUTLINESECOND GRADE EXAMPLE

Narrative Informational Opinion

Theme one: Silly Stories

Theme two:Nature Walk

Theme three:Around Town(current theme)

• Writing a friendly letter to one of the characters

• Picking a neighbor or community and researching it

• Which neighbor would be the best to live in

Theme four:Amazing Animals

Theme five:Family Time

Theme six:Talent Show

Page 15: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

YOUR TURN

• Work with your team level to brainstorm some ideas for the current theme you are working on. If ideas for other themes pop up, feel free to fill those in also.

• Let the primary focus be on the current theme.

• Remember to use your teacher edition to come up with some ideas, don’t recreate the wheel.

• Think creatively! Students will be more engaged and motivated to read and write!

Page 16: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

REFLECTION

On the index card provided, please answer the following questions:

1- What is one activity you are going to use in your classroom in this current theme?

2- What new information did you learn from the presentation today?

3- Is there anything that you would like more information or further clarification on that was presented today?

4- What further support do you need in order to use one activity in your classroom during the current theme?

Page 17: CONNECTING HOUGHTON MIFFLIN AND THE NEW COMMON CORE WRITING STANDARDS CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN THE CLASSROOM.

References

•Alliance For Excellent Education. (2006). Reading and Writing in the Academic Content Areas. Retrieved from http://www.all4ed.org/files/ReadingWritingAcadContent.pdf

•Anderson, N. L., & Briggs, C. (2011). Reciprocity between Reading and Writing: StrategicProcessing as Common Ground. Reading Teacher, 64(7), 546-549.

•Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/ Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf

•Daly, L., & Sharko, S. (2010). Motivating Students to Write through the Use of Children’sLiterature. Online Submission, http://www.eric.ed.gov.proxy-tu.researchport.umd.edu/PDFS/ED509396.pdf

•Leu, D. r. (1994). Designing Hypermedia To Connect Reading and Writing through Children's Literature. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov.proxy-tu.researchport.umd.edu/PDFS/ED396669.pdf

•Literacy. (2011). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Literacy&oldid=459103948

•Montgomery, W. (2001). JOURNAL WRITING: CONNECTING READING AND WRITING IN MAINSTREAM EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 17(1),

93-98. doi:10.1080/105735601455756