congreso_sustainable-tourism-planning.pdf

download congreso_sustainable-tourism-planning.pdf

of 25

Transcript of congreso_sustainable-tourism-planning.pdf

  • 20.02.14

    1

    Multi-Stakeholder Approaches to Developing Ecotourism Destinations El enfoque de trabajo en red de los actores locales para el desarrollo de los destinos de ecoturismo Ideas + Oportunidades + Soluciones

    Max A.E. Rossberg, Deputy Chairman

    What is the European Wilderness Society?

    The community based European Wilderness Society identifies, designates, manages, promotes and lobbies to protect Europes wilderness, the continents most undisturbed areas of nature.

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    The leading wilderness protection organisation in Europe.

  • 20.02.14

    2

    Who is Max A. E. Rossberg

    Educated in Germany and Canada General Manager for Logitech, IBM others in Canada, Ireland,

    Scandinavia Central Europe, Eastern Europe and Spain Went to school with Thomas Mapother (1974) in Ottawa, CDN Senior Partner Protected Area Consulting Tourism Strategies Deputy Chairman of the European Wilderness Society Happily married for 30 years with my wife Anni and 4 kids Based in a UNESCO biosphere reserve in the Austrian Alps UNWTO Focal Point, CIPRA, IUCN, AMA, IAPA, etc.

    Motto since High School: Walk the Talk!

  • 20.02.14

    3

    The Tourism industry

    Mass Tourism industry facts 1) One billion arrivals 2012 2) 1,8 billion expected by 2030 3) Tourism generates more revenue than most industries 4) Tourism is based on trends and innovation 5) Tourism is controlled by selected few (Oligopolies) 6) Tourism is capital intensive and privately controlled

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

  • 20.02.14

    4

    Mass Tourism Travel habits 1) Length of stay worldwide dropped to 10.4 days 2) Length of stay in Austria down to 3,8 days 3) Germans in Spain spent 95 per day/1.284 4) Ecotourism is a small and fragmented market 5) Customer Milieus are becoming more diverse 6) LOHAS are still marginal http://www.tourismusanalyse.de/de/zahlen/daten/statistik/tourismus-urlaub-reisen/2013/reisekosten.html

    Mass Tourism Boosterism

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Tourism seen as inherently good and should be developed Cultural and natural resources should be exploited Boosterism is practised by two groups of people:

    Politicians who philosophically and pragmatically believe that economic growth is always to be promoted and

    by others who will gain financially by tourism.

  • 20.02.14

    5

    Mass Tourism Boosterism

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Tourism Boosterism continues until there are: no more resources to exploit that the real or opportunity costs are too high, or that political opposition to growth can no longer be

    countered.

    Mass Tourism principles Tourism is an extraction business oriented industry It is not sustainable It is often the only source of a regions incoming

    capital besides government subsidies It is based on growth It is cost sensitive and profit oriented It typically is its own reason for demise

  • 20.02.14

    6

    Mass Tourism Lifecycle

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Destination areas carry with them the seeds of their own destruction as they become more commercialised and lose the qualities which originally attracted tourists Exploration Involvement Development Consolidation Stagnation Decline or Rejuvenation

    Is Ecotourism the alternative?

  • 20.02.14

    7

    Why responsible tourism at all The concept of a more responsible tourism emerged as a reaction to the negative impacts of mass tourism as well as a more holistic approach to the general sustainability discourse to achieve environmental, economic and socio-cultural aspects of tourism development. Tourist areas are jumping on the bandwagon due to lack of alternatives, consultants, government pressure and public hype.

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Ecotourism or Sustainable Tourism Ecotourism is a subform of sustainable tourism, used to describe zero impact travel to relatively undisturbed natural areas to understand the culture and natural history of the environment, taking care not to alter the integrity of the ecosystem, while producing economic opportunities that make the conservation of natural resources beneficial to local people. Source: The International Ecotourism Society.

  • 20.02.14

    8

    Is there an Ecotourism market? How many travelled by car, plane or train to this congress? How many did a Co2 offset? Who based his vacation decision on Ecotourism aspects? Meeting customer expectations is almost impossible Ecotourism is currently more a marketing hype than a real

    product

    Is Sustainable Tourism achievable? Tourism will never be completely sustainable, but it can work towards becoming more sustainable. The need for sustainable/responsible planning and management is imperative for the tourism industry to survive as a whole. It offers broader opportunities for rural areas than Ecotourism.

  • 20.02.14

    9

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Murphy & Price in Theobald 2005, p. .175

    Sustainable Tourism Model

    Tourism: The saviour?

  • 20.02.14

    10

    Why is tourism so interesting Often the only potential direct source of income Local unemployment could be reduced Public support for rural areas could be increased Investment in infrastructure could be financed Training of local management could be improved

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Tourism challenges of rural areas Rural areas are often in less developed regions Multitude of local interests especially if it is a PA Often poor local infrastructure Government funding often the only source of capital

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

  • 20.02.14

    11

    Tourism challenges of rural areas Government funding increasingly under pressure Few local tourism professionals available Management skills are scarce networking seldom Depopulation due to urbanization pressure Lack of local Marketing Knowhow and funding

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Peneda-Geres NP PGNP Archives

    Uniqueness of rural areas

  • 20.02.14

    12

    What can a rural area offer? Unique landscapes Unique experiences Unique flora and fauna Unique wildlife Unique destinations Unique cultural and social traditions

    What can a rural area NOT offer? Guarantee of wildlife sightings Uncontrolled access Uncontrolled growth opportunity Events specifically for tourists Stop of the natural community processes Tourism specific infrastructure

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

  • 20.02.14

    13

    Tourism in a rural area Can boost environmental safe infrastructure Can build public support for rural areas Can offer employment to locals Can distribute wealth from urban to rural areas Can assist in building a sustainable local economy Can increase political support for rural areas

    Borjomi-Kharagauli NP Konstantin Gabrichidze

    Must Dos

  • 20.02.14

    14

    Many ways to Rome

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Define long-term objectives Define how locals in the region will benefit Define a long term investment strategy Define the basic tourist infrastructure Define the carrying capacity limits Define the benefits to the local economy Involve all stakeholders

    Borjomi-Kharagauli NP Konstantin Gabrichidze

    The Stakeholders

  • 20.02.14

    15

    Stakeholders Involve ALL stakeholders of all genders, ages, social status, political affiliation, marital status, cultural heritage and nationality living in the region DO NOT JUST FOCUS on local tourism professionals

    Get them Involved

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Clear objective understood by everyone Bottom up approach minimize management! Step by step approach Regular meetings and perfect communication Work without subsidies to encourage local ownership Take risk and encourage dissent Take them serious regardless of outcome

  • 20.02.14

    16

    Sustainable Tourism Planning

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Establish tourism development objectives and policies

    Ensure that natural and cultural resources are maintained and conserved for present and future use

    Integrate tourism into overall development policies and patterns of a region and establish linkages with other economic sectors

    Sustainable Tourism Planning

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Provide rational basis for decision-making by public and private sector

    Co-ordinate development of the many elements of the tourism sector

    Optimise and balance economic, environmental and social benefits of tourism, whilst minimising impacts

    Provide an appropriate physical structure for the location in which development is taking place

  • 20.02.14

    17

    Sustainable Tourism Planning

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Establish guidelines and standards for development Provide necessary organisational and institutional

    framework Provide framework for effective co-ordination of

    public/private sectors (After Getz, 1987; Hall et al., 1997)

    Sustainable Tourism Planning

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Step 1: Conduct preliminary studies Step 2: Community knowledge of tourism Step 3: Determine level of participation Step 4: Determine appropriate participation mechanism Step 5: Collective decision-making Step 6: Development of an action and implementation plan Step 7: Monitoring and evaluation

  • 20.02.14

    18

    Borjomi-Kharagauli NP Konstantin Gabrichidze

    Reasons for Failure

    Design Stage Failure

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Ambiguous or conflicting objectives Absence of analytical detail Too much emphasis on physical development Inadequate market assessment Projects only evaluated on financial basis No consideration of impact on host community economy or

    environment Poor involvement of local stakeholders

  • 20.02.14

    19

    Implementation Stage Failure

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Miscalculations regarding use and control of land High debt/equity ratios

    Lack of co-ordination between public and private sectors Poor communication

    Failure to produce planning legislation in time More concern with profit than with quality of product Public opposition

    Poor location or design of the facilities

    Borjomi-Kharagauli NP Konstantin Gabrichidze

    Pros and Cons

  • 20.02.14

    20

    Economic Impacts Positive Economic growth Foreign Investment Value of real estate rise Standard of living increase Infrastructure improvement Local products demand

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Negative Inflation Foreign Labour and Investments Speculation Wealthy and poor spread Neglecting other sectors Loss of ownership

    Tourism Commercial Impacts Positive Increased destination image Improved infrastructure

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Negative Uncontrolled destination image Facilities for tourism only two sided coin

  • 20.02.14

    21

    Environmental Impacts Positive Environmental values Environmental awareness Maintenance of biodiversity Preservation of heritage

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Negative Destruction of habitat and ecosystems Exceeding physical carrying capacity Loss of heritage Architectural pollution Resource conflicts (water) Increase pollution Traffic congestion

    Social Impacts Positive Influx of new ideas Cultural exchange Quality of life Increase local identity Local participation Improved living conditions

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Negative Local knowledge less worth Loss of cultural uniqueness Loss of community values Overcrowding Prostitution/Alcohol Changes in community structure

  • 20.02.14

    22

    Peneda-Geres NP PGNP Archives

    Tourism in EWS areas

    Mix of Partners The European Wilderness Society certifies protected and wilderness areas, tour operators and local business partners in Europe. All of them must meet a certain set of criteria. In addition the European Wilderness Society has just launched a new Website www.wilderness-travel.org to promote sustainable tourism in protected areas.

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

  • 20.02.14

    23

    Quality standard for local business Quality Standard is defined as a part of overall the European

    Wilderness Society Quality Standard that includes the principles Wilderness and Environmental Values,

    Management Effectiveness, Visitor Management Strategies, Sustainable tourism development strategy and local business partner. Each principle has a set of Criteria and each Criteria a the set of Indicators

    An independent quality audit is the basis of certification Quality Standards for local business partners focus on environmental,

    socio-economic, communication and partnership aspects The aim is to show how well managed wilderness protected area/s

    provide a benefit to the local economy

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

    Quality standard for tour operators International tour operators (usually small or medium size) are well

    known for their sensitive, environmentally friendly operation These partners have an interest and commitment to introduce to their

    clients a wilderness experience but simultaneously respect environmental, social-economical and ethical standards as defined above.

    Each Tour operator signs a letter of understanding defining the European Wilderness Society principles.

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

  • 20.02.14

    24

    Polistovsky NR Polistovsky Nature Reserve archive

    Summary

    Sustainable Tourism can help rural areas It needs to be managed bottom-up It must meet a set of sustainability criteria It must be aware of the limitations the region It must be locally owned and operated It must involve community stakeholders It should not be the only source of income It should be long-term oriented

    Arch

    ipel

    ago

    NP

    ANP

    Arc

    hive

    s

  • 20.02.14

    25

    The European Wilderness Society works to identify, designates, manages and promotes Europes wilderness, the continents most undisturbed areas of nature

    www.wilderness-society.org