Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

download Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

of 22

Transcript of Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    1/22

    r ng p m za on o e ar on erous orma on

    Using Automated Drilling Tools and Hybrid Bits

    era. on erenc a ag s ra e a

    SPE STUDENT CHAPTER COCHABAMBA

    Gustavo Prraga / Paul Schulhauser Baker Hughes

    Edwin Badani Repsol

    ,

    June, 7th 2013

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    2/22

    Presentation outline

    I. Introduction

    .

    III. Development

    .

    V. Conclusions

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    3/22

    Introduction Geographical LocationI.

    415,000 420,000 425,000 430,000

    7'685,000

    7'690,000

    7'685,000

    7'690,000

    HCY-X1

    7'680,0007'680,000

    7'675,0007'675,000

    Ubicacin

    Pozo MGR-6

    MGR-4

    Ubicacin

    Pozo MGR-5

    Field located in Southern Bolivia

    7'670,000

    7'665,000

    7'670,000

    7'665,000

    MGR-X3

    MGR-X1

    - Carboniferous sequence poses the

    greatest challenges

    -

    7'660,0007'660,000

    MGR-X2415,000 420,000 425,000 430,000

    7'655,0007'655,000

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    4/22

    Introduction Formation analysisI.

    Carboniferous PeriodCarboniferous Period comprises:

    San Telmo

    (mudstone interbedded

    with Diamictite, Sandstone and

    Pelite)

    Escarpment

    (Las Peas)

    (Sandstone interbedded with

    Tarija

    (Sandstone and Diamictite)

    Itacuami (Pelite)

    T bi Tupambi an s one n er e ewith Conglomerate and Pelite)

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    5/22

    Background History drillingII.

    EscarpmentTarija I

    Itacuami I

    Taiguati

    Tupambi I

    Bororigua

    FaultHCY-X1

    TarijaEscarpment II

    MGR-6

    MGR-4

    ItacuamiItacuami II

    Escarpment III

    MGR-X3

    MGR-5

    MGR-X1

    Drilling time in HCY-X1 took 44 days longer to reach 3300m than

    MGR-X4 (only 17 section)

    Both sections drilling the same geologic sequence Escarpment

    Taiguati Tarija Tupambi (2200m length)

    Tupambi III

    Itacuami IIIMGR-X2

    Cost difference for using different systems:3.9M

    (17 section)

    Well closure in MGR-X4 = 50m @ 3294m

    Well closure in HCY-X1 = 118m @ 3299m

    MGR X4

    Tarija II

    HCY-X1 (RSS)MGR-4 (VTK)

    MGR-X4

    HCY-X1: 38 BIT RUNS TO REACH 3386m

    2004 2006

    17 Sections

    UCS 0-30ksi

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    6/22

    Background ScenarioII.

    Top issues to be focused on them for improvements

    Geologyeology eologyeology

    Examine formation properties andperform trials on Simulator

    Drilling System Enhancement

    Vibration Management

    BHAHA

    Hole tortuosity

    Bit designitit

    New cutting structure

    Bit selection/optimization

    Vibration Management

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    7/22

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    8/22

    Background ScenarioII.

    BHAHA

    DeviationBHA design influences on results:

    ontro

    Poor

    Hole instability

    Tortuosity

    Performances Drilling time

    Vibrations

    Uneven wear on pads of RSS

    Influenced by Off Center mechanism

    DHM+RNBS DHM+STB SLEEVE

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    9/22

    Background ScenarioII.

    Bitsits

    Tracking, Off-Center and

    Rounded Gage

    considered as main dull

    characteristics

    st

    impregnated bit and

    turbine

    Lost in Hole & Side

    Track

    (17 MGR-5)

    17 PDC (HCY-X1)

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    10/22

    DevelopmentIII.

    APerformanceerformance Drillingrilling Proposalroposal

    , combining automated drilling systems

    (Vertitrak/TruTrak) and hybrid bits (Kymera) is offered as the Best Solution for

    .

    Objectives to be achieved:

    Keep verticality.

    Improve hole quality.

    Reduce tortuosity.

    Reduce bit runs.

    Increase ROP values.

    .

    Reduce torque and drag.

    Maximum safety for the casing program.

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    11/22

    Genesis of Kymera designIII.

    Roller Cone

    as c u ng ec an cs

    CRUSHING

    PDC

    Basic Cuttin Mechanics

    SHE RING

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    12/22

    Kymera bit action on bottomIII.

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    13/22

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    14/22

    Automated Directional Drilling ToolsIII.

    Movie created from experience in Northern Argentina (Mac-1001 vs. Mac-1001bis wells - PAE)

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    15/22

    Field Results Drilling curvesIV.

    Daily curves

    Remarkable resultsDistance drilled and ROP

    si nificantl increased

    3 Kymera bits (24)

    for drilling 990m

    Cut several days off

    original drilling curves (not

    shown)4 Kymera bits (17)

    Improved last poor

    experiences using previous

    technologies (bits & drilling

    s stems

    6 Kymera bits

    (17) for

    drilling 1509.5m

    for drilling 1321m

    except

    (169m of the section

    length drilled with

    other bit types)

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    16/22

    Field Results Drilling curves of 24-26IV.

    3 Kymera bits for drilling 990m

    (MGR-6)DHM

    VTK

    Considered as the Best Performance

    through Carboniferous formation.

    Greater distance drilled per bit

    2 4X

    VTK

    2.4X

    .

    Improved ROP (2.5X).

    (a)Savings of 14 days

    compared toes se - .

    (b) Savings of 20 days compared to

    last drilled Offset (MGR-5).

    (a) 14 days

    (b) 20 days

    PERFORMANCE Total Net Savings 24 Section

    ~US$ 2.000.000

    Considering Operational Costs of US$100.000/day

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    17/22

    Field Results Bit Runs & ROP per wellIV.

    24-26 Comparison

    BEST PERFORMANCE

    rse

    ction

    [m/h]

    Runspe

    ROP

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    18/22

    Field Results Drilling curves of 17IV.

    Considered as the Best Performance

    DHM-RSS

    VTK

    through Carboniferous formation.

    Greater distance drilled per bit

    (4.6X

    ).

    TTK-VTK

    - - -

    ImprovedROP

    (2.7X

    ).

    (a) Savings of 24 days compared to

    best Offset (MGR-4).

    (b)Savings of 33 days

    compared to

    last drilled Offset (MGR-5).

    o a e av ngs ec on

    ~ US$ 3.300.000

    PERFORMANCE(a) 24 days

    (b) 33 days

    Considering Operational Costs of US$100.000/day

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    19/22

    Field Results Bit Runs & ROP per wellIV.

    17 Comparison

    ction

    ROP[m/h]

    Runspers

    6 Kymera bits

    4 Kymera bits

    for 1321m

    6 Kymera bits

    for 1509.5m

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    20/22

    Field Results RecordsIV.

    Ability to drill greater distances at higher ROP

    Size Type DD ROP Well Formation

    24 HP633X 457 5.3 MGR-6 TARIJA

    24 HP633X 429 4.1 MGR-6 TARIJA

    17 KM633 382 3.1 MGR-5 TARIJA

    17 KM633 328 2.9 MGR-5 ITAC.-TUPAMBI

    17 KM633 303 4.2 MGR-5 TAIGUATI-TARIJA

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    21/22

    ConclusionsV.

    1. Hybrid Technology (Kymera bits

    ) greatly adapts to the drilling

    2. Drilling Dysfunctions

    such as Off Center wear, Rounded Gage, Flat

    Cresting and Tracking are greatly minimized or eliminated all together.

    3. Synergy between Hybrid bits (Kymera

    ) and Automated Vertical Drilling

    Systems (VertiTrak/TruTrak

    ) helpsmaximize drilling performances

    ,

    turning difficult environments easy to drill at excellent rates.

    4. Get collateral benefits

    as improved hole quality, less tortuosity, reduced

    borehole instability, less wear of string and casing, less time for runningcasings

    5 V b i E i l I t. Very obvious Economical Impact.

  • 8/10/2019 Conferencia SPE EMI Cochabamba 7 Junio 2013

    22/22