Conducted by

16
Evaluation of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program: Achievement Impacts After Three Years of Treatment Exposure Conducted by Westat, University of Arkansas, Chesapeake Research Associates, Georgetown University Presented by Patrick Wolf, Principal Investigator “Reversion to the Mean or Does Dosage Matter?” IES Annual Research Conference June 8, 2009 Washington, DC

description

Evaluation of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program: Achievement Impacts After Three Years of Treatment Exposure. Conducted by Westat, University of Arkansas, Chesapeake Research Associates, Georgetown University Presented by Patrick Wolf, Principal Investigator - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Conducted by

Page 1: Conducted by

Evaluation of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program:

Achievement Impacts After Three Years of Treatment Exposure

Conducted by

Westat, University of Arkansas, Chesapeake Research Associates, Georgetown University

Presented by

Patrick Wolf, Principal Investigator

“Reversion to the Mean or Does Dosage Matter?” IES Annual Research Conference

June 8, 2009Washington, DC

Page 2: Conducted by

Presentation Overview The Program The Study Achievement Impacts in Year 3 Achievement Impacts Over Time Dosage in the Context of School

Choice

Page 3: Conducted by

The Opportunity Scholarship Program DC School Choice Incentive Act signed in early 2004 $14 million/yr for 1,700 student vouchers worth up

to $7,500 Eligible students must be:

DC residents entering grades K-12 income <= 185 percent of poverty

Priority to applicants from “needs improvement” (SINI) schools

68 participating private schools in D.C.

Page 4: Conducted by

The Impact Evaluation Randomized Control Trial (RCT) Design: baseline

eligible applicants assigned by lottery to be offered (“treatment” group) or not offered (“control” group) a scholarship

Impact Sample: First two cohorts in 2004 (Cohort 1) and 2005 (Cohort 2) 1,387 students assigned to treatment, 921 to control Cohort 1 outcomes lagged one year and combined with Cohort 2 Outcomes tracked annually: SAT-9 in reading and math, parent

surveys, student surveys, principal surveys (public and private)

Analysis: Regression-adjusted intent-to-treat (ITT) impact, Bloom-adjusted impact-on-treated (IOT), Instrumental Variable Analysis of effect of private schooling

Page 5: Conducted by

DC Choice: Year 3 Achievement Impacts Overall:

Reading impact of 4.5 scale score points (.13 SD or 3.1 months of learning)

No impact in math

Subgroups by student baseline conditions:

Reading impacts for (1) non-SINI, (2) higher performing, (3) female, (4) K-8, (5) Cohort 1

No impacts for (1) SINI, (2) lower performing, (3) male, (4) 9-12, (5) Cohort 2

No impacts for any subgroups in math

Page 6: Conducted by

Regression Adjusted Impact and Confidence Interval: Year 3 Reading

Sca

le s

core

poin

ts

Page 7: Conducted by

Regression Adjusted Impact and Confidence Interval: Year 3 Math

Page 8: Conducted by

DC Choice: Achievement Impacts Over Time Overall effects across 3 outcome years:

Apparent trend of cumulating impacts in reading No apparent trend in math

Subgroup reading effects across 3 outcome years: Of 5 with significant impacts in year 3, all but Cohort

1 suggest cumulating impacts Of 5 without impacts in year 3, X suggest

cumulating impacts Data not pooled across years so significance of

trends unknown

Page 9: Conducted by

Impacts Over Three Year for

the Full SampleSca

le s

core

poin

ts

Page 10: Conducted by

Impacts Over Three Years: SINI at Baseline Subgroups

Sca

le s

core

poin

ts

Page 11: Conducted by

Impacts Over Three Years: Baseline Performance Subgroups

Sca

le s

core

poin

ts

Page 12: Conducted by

Impacts Over Three Years: Gender Subgroups

Sca

le s

core

poin

ts

Page 13: Conducted by

Impacts Over Three Years: Grade Subgroups

Sca

le s

core

poin

ts

Page 14: Conducted by

Impacts Over Three Years: Cohort Subgroups

Sca

le s

core

poin

ts

Page 15: Conducted by

The DC Choice Evaluation and Treatment Dosage Impact patterns differ by domain:

Math may have suffered reversion to the mean Reading impacts appear to cumulate No obvious reason for the difference

School choice interventions may require long treatment exposure to demonstrate results: Starts with adjustment to a school switch May then place student on steeper growth curve

Bring on Year 4!

Page 16: Conducted by

Contact InfoPatrick Wolf, Ph.D.Professor and 21st Century Endowed Chair in

School ChoiceDepartment of Education ReformCollege of Education and Health Professions201 Graduate Education BuildingUniversity of ArkansasFayetteville, AR  72701Phone: 479-575-2084FAX: [email protected]