CONCEPTUAL PLAN & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Project : “Group housing project” Conceptual Plan &

Environmental Management Plan Land owner : Deepak Arya POA Holder

Manoj Agarwal, Sunil Malani, Sanju Rungta

Developer :JKD Pearl India Developers Pvt. Ltd.

1

CONCEPTUAL PLAN &

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

INTRODUCTION:

The proposed project involves construction of a group housing project at Khasra no. 37, village

Jhalana Chowd, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj). The total plot area of the project is 8,054.04

sq. m. and the built up area envisaged is 54,087.20 sq. m. The project will constitute of 284 flats (2

BHK: 132 nos., 3 BHK: 152 nos.), commercial facilities (753.36 sq. m.), club house (1246.61 sq.

m.). Estimated cost of the project will be Rs. 65 crores. The maximum height gained by the project

will be 44.50 m (upto machine room/ mumty level).

PROJECT DEVELOPERS:

The project is coming up on a land duly converted for group housing purpose and owned jointly by

Mr. Manoj Agarwal, Mr. Sunil Malani, Mrs. Sanju Rungta. Development agreement for the project

was executed with M/s JKD Pearl India Developers Pvt. Ltd. on 23.07.2014 {copy of development

agreement enclosed as Annexure I (b)), while the Special power of attorney for obtaining all the

statutory approvals was conferred to Mr. Deepak Arya on 07.08.2013 {copy enclosed as Annexure

I (a)}

JKD Pearl India Developers Pvt. Ltd. is a Real Estate Conglomerate, with an expertise of over

15 years encompassing developments in the areas of luxury apartments, commercial malls,

residential townships.

NEED OF THE PROJECT:

Jaipur city has grown much beyond the old traditional 'Pink City', which used to confine within the

seven gates and landscaped with old forts, palaces and buildings of historical significance.

Favorable demographics and economic growth have led to the expansion of municipal limits and





2

Jaipur now comprises other locations, apart from just the old city. The city is witnessing somewhat

a radial expansion, especially along the major roads connecting with the neighboring cities.

Mansarovar, touted as Asia's third largest colony, was established by the Rajasthan Housing Board.

The region caters to a mix of LIG (Low Income Group), MIG (Middle Income Group) and HIG

(High Income Group) segments. The development has predominantly been low rise; however, there

are plans to go vertical. The region also witnesses the presence of reputed local developers. Despite

the lure of land and independent houses, people have started to acquire a taste for apartments/

builder developments, though it is still nascent. The key factors such as the charm of better

amenities, gated security facilities and aspirations for upgraded living standards have attributed to

such transition of perspective. This transition has been noticed in the past 3-4 years with the advent

of MNCs, IT/ITeS and BFSI expansion.

PROJECT SUMMARY:

Items Details

Project address Khasra no 37, Village Jhalana Chowd, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj)

Type of project Residential Project (Building & Construction).

Screening category The project is categorized under 'B-2' under item 8(a) of Schedule – Gazette

Notification dated Sep 14th, 2006 and subsequent amendments thereoff.

Plot area 8,054.06 sq. m.

Built up area 54,087.20 sq. m. (including basements & stilt)

Ground coverage Permissible : 35% (standard): 2818.92 sq. m. + 5% (purchasable): 402.70 sq. m.

: 40% (3,221.62 sq. m.)

Proposed : 37.45% (3,016.64 sq. m.)

No. of Basement 01

Green Area Total Green area : 1610.81 sq. m. (21.01%)

• Ground : 411. 57 sq. m. (5.11%)

• Podium : 1280.82 sq. m. (15.90%)

Maximum height 44.50 m (upto machine room/ mumty level)

41.60 m (upto terrace level)





3

No. of Floors Basement, Stilt + 13 floors

Total number of

Dwelling units

284

3 BHK : 152

2 BHK : 132

Parking facilities Required Parking : 438 ECU

Proposed Parking : 445 ECU

Power requirement

& source

Connected load : 3764.7 KW

Maximum demand : 1931 KW

Source: JVVNL

Power backup DG sets of capacity 250 kVA (1 no.)

Water requirement

& source

Total Water requirement: 239 KLD

Fresh Water: 139 KLD

Recycled Water: 99 KLD

Source: Municipal Water Supply, Hired private Tankers

Sewage treatment &

disposal

Sewage treatment facility: STP of 220 KLD capacity

Sewage discharge: 65 KLD

REGULATORY COMPLIANCE:

• The project has been duly approved for construction of group housing complex by Jaipur

Development Authority and the Patta has been issued on dated 03.12.2013.

• Development agreement with M/s JKD Pearl India Developers Pvt. Ltd. was executed on dated

23.07.2013.

• NOC from AAI (Airport Authority of India) has been obtained vide letter no AAI/NOC/ 2014/

69/ 4832-37 on 03.03.2014.

• Water demand for the project will be met through PHED supply.

PROJECT DETAILS:

The project will constitute of 324 flats. Details of flat distribution are given as under:





4

Flat type BUA (sq. ft.) Number of units/ floor Total floors Total units

2 BHK 942 11 12 132

3 BHK (Type 1) 1370 5 12 60

3 BHK (Type 2) 1131 7 12 84

3 BHK (Type 3) 1170 2 4 8

Total 25 284

Commercial (Stilt +

first floor)

753.36 sq. m. -- -- --

Club house 1246.61 sq. m. -- -- --

BUILT UP AREA DETAILS:

S.

No.

Floor FAR area

(sq. m.)

Built up area

(sq. m.)

Gross built up area

(sq. m.)

1. Basement Nil 6604.84 6604.84

2. Stilt 305.85 4697.46 4697.46

3. First 447.51 3016.64 4420.73

4. Second floor 2021.16 2861.57 3085.20

5. Third floor 2021.16 2861.57 3085.20

6. Fourth floor 2209.10 3068.89 3315.68

7. Fifth floor 2209.10 3068.89 3315.68

8. Sixth floor 2021.16 2861.57 3314.92

9. Seventh floor 2021.16 2861.57 3085.20

10. Eight floor 2021.16 2861.57 3085.20

11. Ninth floor 2021.16 2861.57 3085.20

12. Tenth floor 2310.24 3068.89 3315.68

13. Eleventh floor 2310.24 3068.89 3315.68

14. Twelfth floor 2106.98 2861.57 3314.92

15. Thirteenth floor 1816.63 2560.49 2560.49

16. Terrace Nil 485.12 485.12

Total 25842.61 49,671.10 54,087.20

Extra FAR of corridor : 102.43 sq. m.

Total FAR area: 25842.61 + 102.43 : 25945.04 sq. m.





5

PARKING REQUIREMENT:

A. Residential:

FAR area : 25,089.25 sq. m. (excluding commercial FAR)

1 ECU per 75 sq. m. of FAR area

ECU required : 334.5 say 335

B. Commercial:

FAR area : 753.36 sq. m.

1 ECU per 50 sq. m. of FAR area

ECU required : 15

C. Total (A+ B) : 350

D. Visitors:

25% of C : 87.5 say 88 ECU

E. Total ECU required : 438

F. Total ECU provided : 445

Details of parking are given as:

S.

No.

Details Cars Two wheelers Total

ECU

Basis of

ECS

Area

required

(sq. m.)

Area

provided

(sq. m.)

1. Open area 100 42 (14 ECU) 114 23 sq. m. 2,622 2,622

2. Stilt 98 129 (43 ECU) 141 28 sq. m. 3,948 4,200

4. Basement 128 186 (62 ECU) 190 32 sq. m. 6,080 6,200

Total 326 357 (119 ECU) 445 12,650 13,022





6

POWER REQUIREMENT:

Power requirement for the proposed project is given as under:

S. No. Description

1. Source of supply 33 kV supply will be from nearest JVVNL GSS at Mansarovar

2. Electrical Load Connected load : 3764.7 KW

Maximum demand : 1931 KW

3. Transformer No. of transformers 1 no.

Capacity 3,000 kVA, 33 /0.433 kV

4. DG Sets No. of DG sets 1

Cumulative DG Capacity 250 kVA

Fuel Used HSD (sulphur content: 0.05%)

Fuel Consumption 40 l/hr

The breakup of the same is as under:

S.

N

o.

Description No. of

units

Light

load

per

unit

Power

load

per

unit

Total

light

load

Total

power

load

Connected

load

(KW)

DF Max

demand

(KW)

Residential

1. 2 BHK 132 2 8 264 1056 1320 0.5 660

2. 3 BHK 152 3 10 456 1520 1976 0.5 988

Common/

commercial

Area

(sq. ft)

1. Parking 121612 30 0 30 0.5 15

2. Club house &

others

15000 30 100 130 0.5 65

3. Commercial 8134 26 122 148 0.5 74

Utilities 0

1. Lifts 9 nos. 0 65.7 65.7 0.8 53

2. Water supply

pumps

0 30 30 0.8 24





7

3. Landscape

lighting

10 0 10 0.8 8

4. Façade and

street lighting

5 0 5 0.8 4

5. STP 1 nos. -- 0 40 40 0.8 32

6 Fire fighting

(jockey pump)

0 10 10 0.8 8

Total 821 2943.7 3764.7 1931

Back Up Source:

There will be power backup for common areas and essential services through a DG sets of capacity

of 250 kVA used in case of power cut or failure. DG set will be provided with an effective safe

stack height of 42 m for proper dispersion of pollutants that will keep the emissions within the

permissible limit. The fuel requirement will be about 40 l/hr of HSD (as and when used).

CRITERIA OF WATER DEMAND:

The daily water requirement for the proposed development will be 239 KLD (fresh water: 140 KLD

and the recycled/reused water demand: 99 KLD).

Criteria of water demand are given as under:

S.

No.

Particulars Population Fresh water demand Treated water

demand

Total water

demand

1. Group Housing 1420 @ 90 LPCD: 128 KLD @45 LPCD: 64 KLD 192 KLD

2. Commercial 200 @ 30 LPCD: 6 KLD @ 15 LPCD: 3 KLD 9 KLD

3. Visitors 350 @ 9 LPCD: 3 KLD @ 6 LPCD: 2 KLD 5 KLD

4. Club 350 @ 9 LPCD: 3 KLD @ 6 LPCD: 2 KLD 5 KLD

5. Landscaping -- 8 KLD 8 KLD

6. General washing -- -- 20 KLD 20 KLD

Total 140 KLD 99 KLD 239 KLD





8

WATER BALANCE

Fresh water

140 KLD

Residential

128 KLD

Commercial, club

house, visitors

12 KLD

STP treated water

99 KLD

Flushing

71 KLD

Landscaping &

General washing

28 KLD

182 KLD

Waste water

S

T

P

Capacity

220 KLD

Sludge &

evaporation

losses

18 KLD

Drain

65 KLD

Recycled/ reused for flushing, landscaping & general washing

102

10

70

Daily water demand: 239 KLD

{140 KLD (fresh) + 99 KLD (recycled/ reused water)}

Source: Fresh Water : PHED Water Supply

Treated Waste water: STP Treated Water





9

IDENTIFICATION, PREDICTION AND EVALUATION OF IMPACTS:

Environmental impact can be defined as any alteration of environmental conditions, adverse or

beneficial, caused or induced by the action or set of actions under consideration.

Various operations involved in the project have been studied in details to identify, predict and

evaluate impacts on various environmental components. The identified impacts were quantified

using mathematical models to a possible extent so as to estimate the future environmental scenario.

AIR ENVIRONMENT:

Ambient air monitoring report

Instrument used: Respirable Dust Sampler (SLE-RDS 103 & SLE-GA 133) & Fine Particle Sampler APM 550)

Sampling date: 21-22.07.2014, Duration: 24 hrs.

Parameter Observation Permissible

(maximum)

Analysis Method & Protocol

PM10 (µg/m3) 82.6 100 IS: 5182 (P-23)

PM2.5 (µg/m3) 47.3 60 SOP-AAQ/89/01

SO2(µg/m3) 14.8 80 IS: 5182 (P-2) Improvised West & Geake

NOx(µg/m3) 31.4 80 IS: 5182 (P-6)

CO (mg/m3) <1.15 2 IS:5182 (P-10) Grab Method

* Monitoring reports enclosed as Annexure IV

Instrument Sensitivity:

Instrument Range and Sensitivity

Respirable Dust Sampler (RDS) (PM-10)

0.40 – 1.5 m3/min

±0.02 m3/min

(Other gases)

0 – 3 LPM

± 0.2 LPM

Fine Particulate Sampler (PM – 2.5) : ±0.03 DGM m3





10

Wind Pattern Data & Rose Diagram:

S.No Wind

Direction

0.5-2.1

Speed m/s

2.1-3.6

Speed m/s

>= 3.6

Speed m/s

Total

1. N 35 0 0 35

2. NNE 34 0 0 34

3. NE 41 0 0 41

4. ENE 37 0 0 37

5. E 15 0 0 15

6. ESE 14 0 0 14

7. SE 33 0 0 33

8. SSE 73 0 0 73

9. S 77 0 0 77

10. SSW 23 0 0 23

11. SW 30 0 0 30

12. WSW 39 0 0 39

13. W 67 0 0 67

14. WNW 46 0 0 46

15. NW 58 0 0 58

16. NNW 36 0 0 36

WRPLOT View - Lakes Environmental Software

Resultant Vector

119 deg - 16%

NORTH

SOUTH

WEST EAST

1.6%

3.2%

4.8%

6.4%

8%

WIND SPEED

(m/s)

>= 11.1

8.8 - 11.1

5.7 - 8.8

3.6 - 5.7

2.1 - 3.6

0.5 - 2.1

Calms: 40.54%





11

CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

SOURCES OF POLLUTION:

1. Vehicular Exhaust:

The major source of pollution in construction phase will be vehicles carrying construction

material. Pollution load from the same is calculated as :

Pollution Load = No. of trucks × Emission Factors × Deterioration Factor

Due to movement of average 05 trucks short term pollution load is given in table:

Parameter Emission Factor

(g /km)*

Deterioration Factor

(g /km)*

Pollution Load

(g/km)

CO 4.5 1.33 29.92

NOx 1.21 1 6.05

SPM 0.8 1.595 6.38

SO2 0.15 1 0.75

HC 1.21 1 6.05

* Source : CPCB Publication, 1998

2. Emissions from Construction equipments:

The fugitive dust emission sources are:

• Excavation

• Haul road movements

• Construction

• Material Handling

• Finishing

Emissions factors for construction equipment are given in table below:

Equipment Emissions Factors (g/hr)

CO VOC NOX SOX PM10

Excavator 214.09 43.99 516.18 3.31 27.21

Backhoe/ Front end loader 190.05 56.69 370.13 1.58 37.64

Rubber tired crane 161.02 39.00 464.02 2.67 23.58

Hydraulic Crane 161.02 39.00 464.02 2.67 23.58

Concrete Vibrator 72.57 13.60 122.46 0 4.53

Paving Equipment 186.42 48.53 412.31 1.95 29.93

Roller/ Compactor 165.10 34.92 316.15 1.90 23.13

*Source: SCAQMD CEQA Hanbook





12

MITIGATION MEASURES:

SOURCES MANAGEMENT

Dust & emissions from

vehicular exhaust.

• Regular sprinkling of water on the haul-road.

• Speed restriction of all vehicles.

• Vehicles will be checked for PUC certification.

The dust emission sources are:

• Excavation

• Haul road movements

• Construction

• Material Handling

• Finishing

• Water spraying to prevent dust pollution from different sources

of construction.

• All transportation vehicles will be suitably covered &

overloading of the vehicles will be avoided.

• Covering of the construction site on all four sides to a

considerable height to prevent dust emissions and other

pollutants to the surrounding environment.

• Ensuring vehicles stick to the access track to prevent mud and

dirt being deposited on roads.

POST CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

SOURCES:

1. Carbon Foot Print (GHG emission) :

Estimated “Carbon Footprint” emissions per annum after commissioning of project due to

direct sources of green house gas (GHG) is given as:

Sources CO2 e (T) / annum (Baseline ) CO2 e (T) / annum With EMP

LPG 12 8

Transport 24 17

Waste Water & MSW 803 562

DG 1.75 1.35

TOTAL 216.14 588.35

Source:

[1. * Brander et al., Aug 2011; 2. **WHO Publication No 62 ; 3. ***CPCB Publication 1998; 4.****IPCC Guidelines, 2006]





13

2. DG sets:

The source of emission will be from a D.G. set of capacity of 250 kVA which will be used in

case of power cuts or failure.

The details are as under:

Calculation of stack height of D.G. sets

The stack height of DG set is calculated as under:

H = 0.2 (√capacity of the DG set in kVA)

= 0.2 x (√250)

= 0.2 x 15.81

= 3.16 m

However, a safe stack height of 42 m above the roof of DG house will be provided.

Impact on Air Quality

For the proposed air environmental impact assessment study, United States Environmental

Protection Agency (USEPA) approved and also recommended by the Ministry of Environment and

Forests (MoEF), Government of India, regulatory air quality model i.e. Industrial Source Complex

Short Term (ISCST3-version 3) is applied to predict ground level incremental concentrations

(GLCs) of concerned critical pollutants.

The ISCST3 model is based on a steady-state Gaussian plume algorithm, and is applicable for

estimating ambient impacts from point, area, and volume sources.

INVENTORY:

DG set and vehicular emissions will be the major source of emissions. NOx and CO will be the

important pollutants emitting from these sources.

The emission source characteristics of the diesel generators and vehicle are provided in following

table:





14

Table : Emission source characteristics

Source Parameter Emission rate per ECU (g/sec/m)

Vehicle NOx 1.17 x 10-6

CO 1.46 x10-5

RESULTS:

Model simulations have been carried and the Ground level concentrations are computed for 24-hr

average. Maximum Ground level concentrations of NOx and CO for study period are 0.86 µg/m3 and

0.317 µg/m3 respectively in southwest direction from the centre of project site. The cumulative

concentration (resultant GLC’s) after the implementation of the project for NOx and CO will be

32.268 µg/m3

and 1150.317 µg/m3

respectively. Both obtained GLC’s (resultant and incremental) are

well within the stipulated CPCB standards.

Details of the results are tabulated and depicted as follows:

Table-1: Predicted 24-Hourly Short Term Maximum Incremental Concentrations

Pollutant Maximum Incremental

Concentration (µµµµg/m3)

(X,Y) coordinates

(m)

Direction

NOx 0.868 (- 1500 , 3000) SW

CO 0.317 (- 1500 ,3000) SW

Table-2: Details of incremental concentration of pollutants on the surroundings

Parameters Baseline Incremental GLC’s, µg/m3 Resultant GLC’s, µg/m

3 Standard, µg/m

3

NOx 31.4 0.868 32.268 80

CO 1150 0.317 1150.317 2000

Stack

No.

DG set

capacity

(kVA)

Stack Characteristics

NOx

(g/kWh)

CO

(g/kWh)

Height

(m)

velocity

(m/s)

Flow Rate

m3/sec

Temp

(K)

Top diameter

(m)

1 250 <9.2 <3.5 3.5 14 0.247 473 0.15





15

FIG.: Isopleths Showing Maximum Incremental Ground Level Concentrations of NOx

FIG.2: Isopleths Showing Maximum Incremental Ground Level Concentrations of CO





16

IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE

Impact Assessment was done and after ranking factor of impacts the significance of occurrence and

sensitivity was assessed. The significance points for proposed project impact are 12 (SP<30) i.e. Low

significance both with and without mitigation measures on following basis:

MANAGEMENT PLAN

SOURCES MANAGEMENT

• Exhaust from D.G. set

of capacity 250 kVA

• EPA/CPCB certified DG set conforming to the CPCB standards will be

deployed.

• D.G. set will be provided with effective stack height of 42 m will be

provided..

• Low-sulphur-content fuel (HSD - Sulphur content 0.05%) will be used.

• Emission due to

vehicular exhausts

especially congestions

during peak traffic

hours.

• Sufficient width of driveways to ensure smooth traffic movements.

• Provisions of fully internalized parking including the parking facilities

for the visitors.

• Guided traffic ways within the project site.

• Speed humps will be installed for speed restrictions inside the project

area.





17

WATER ENVIRONMENT:

GROUND WATER ANALYSIS REPORT*

Date of sampling: 22.07.2014 Location: Near Project site

Parameter Results Complete Test as Per

IS :10500-1991

Protocol

Desirable Limit Permissible Limit

Physical Parameters

Colour, Hazen Units <5.0 5 Max 25 Max IS:3025 (Part 4) 1983

Odour Agreeable Agreeable - IS:3025 (Part 5) 1983

Taste Agreeable Agreeable - IS:3025 (Part 8) 1984

Turbidity, NTU <1.0 5 .0 10.0 IS:3025 (Part 8) 1984

pH value 7.26 6.5 - 8.5 - IS:3025 (Part 11) 1983

Chemical Parameters

Total Hardness as CaCO3 318.0 300 mg/l 600 mg/l IS : 3025 (Part 21) 2009

Calcium( as Ca), mg/l 82.6 75 mg/l 200 mg/l IS : 3025 (Part 40) 1991

Iron (as Fe), mg/l 0.16 0.3 mg/l 1.0 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 53) 2003

Chloride (as Cl), mg/l 110.2 250 mg/l 1000 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 32) 1988

Residual Free Chlorine, mg/l <0.2 0.2 -- IS:3025 (Part 26) 1986

Fluoride (as F), mg/l <1.0 1.0 1.5 IS:3025 (Part 60) 2008

Total Dissolved solids, mg/l 704 500 mg/l 2000 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 16)1984

Magnesium (as Mg), mg/l 26.7 30 mg/l 100 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 46) 1994

Copper (as Cu), mg/l <0.01 0.05 mg/l 1.5 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 42) 1992

Manganese as Mn <0.1 0.1 mg/l 0.3 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 59) 2006

Sulphate (as SO4), mg/l 54.3 200 mg/l 400 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 24) 1986

Nitrate (as NO3), mg/l 7.9 45.0 mg/l No relaxation IS:3025 (Part 34) 1988

Phenolic compounds, mg/l <0.001 0.001 mg/l 0.002 IS:3025 (Part 43) 1992

Mercury(as Hg), mg/l <0.001 0.001 mg/l No relaxation IS:3025 (Part 48) 1994

Selenium(as Se),mg/l <0.005 0.01 No relaxation IS:3025 (Part 56) 2003

Arsenic (as As), mg/l <0.005 0.01 No relaxation IS:3025 (Part 37) 1988

Cyanide(as Cn),mg/l <0.05 0.05 No relaxation IS:3025 (Part 27) 1986

Lead( as Pb), mg/l <0.005 0.05 No relaxation IS:3025 (Part 47) 1994

Zinc (as Zn),mg/l 0.61 5 15 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 49) 1984

Chromium (as Cr),mg/l <0.05 0.05 No relaxation IS:3025 (Part 52) 2003

Alkalinity (as CaCO3), mg/l 186.0 200.0 mg/l 600 mg/l IS : 3025 (Part 23) 1986





18

Aluminum (as Al), mg/l <0.01 0.03 mg/l 0.2 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 55) 2003

Boron (as B), mg/l <0.25 1.0 mg/l 5 mg/l IS:3025 (Part 11) 1983

Cadmium(as Cd), mg/l <0.001 0.01 No relaxation IS:3025 (Part 41) 1992

Anionic detergents (as

MBAS), mg/l

<0.05 0.2 1 mg/l APHA 5540-C

Microbiological Parameters

Total coliform (MPN/100 ml) <1.8 - 10.0 (Max) APHA 9221

Escherichia coli/100 ml Absent - Absent APHA 9221

*Monitoring report enclosed as Annexure IV

CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

SOURCES MANAGEMENT

• Generation of sewerage • Temporary septic tank followed by soak-pit will be provided.

• Significant water

demand for

construction.

• Curing water will be sprayed and after liberal curing all concrete

structures will be covered with gunny bags this will conserve water.

• There will be provision of using polymer dispersion and air entraining

agents to reduce the water demand for construction.

• Un-captured run-off

from the site may

contaminate ground

water aquifers.

• The rain-water entering into the pit will be screened for the removal of

heavy silt and other materials.

• Provisions will be made to ensure the construction vehicles stick to the

access track to prevent mud & dirt being deposited on roads.

• Fence will be constructed around the site to trap sediments whilst

allowing the water to flow through.

• Up slope water will be diverted with turf and due care will be taken not

to mix mortar in locations that will drain into storm water system.

• Unsanitary conditions

during rainy season.

• The civil contractor will be made responsible for site sanitation and will

be bound by the management to adhere to healthy level of sanitation.

• There will be no stagnant water at site, as the runoff from the relevant

areas will be systematically drained into the storm water line. There

will be provision of cleaning the storm water line periodically.





19

POST CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

Daily fresh water demand will be 140 KLD (51,100 cu. m./annum). The fresh water demand will

be met from PHED water supply.

WASTE WATER GENERATION AND TREATMENT:

Sewage treatment plan

Approximate 182 KLD waste water will be generated which will be treated in STP based on

Fluidized Aerobic Bed (FAB) technology with capacity of 220 KLD. Physico chemical

characteristics of influent and effluent are given as:

Parameters Influent Treated effluent

pH 7.5 - 8.5 7 - 8

Suspended solids 200- 225 mg/l <50 mg/l

BOD 200 - 250 mg/l <30 mg/l

COD 350 - 400 mg/l <60 mg/l

Oil & Grease 20-25 mg/l <5 mg/l

Coliform (CFU /100 ml) 103- 10

5 50-500 or less

SCHEMATIC LAYOUT OF STP:





20

MANAGEMENT & MITIGATION MEASURES

Water use management

36 % reduction in water demand can be achieved by use of water efficient fixtures. Details of the

same as described below:

S.No. Particulars Details

1. Urine Flush Per Day (UFPD) (under without conservation F- C) 9 lpcd x 3 times

2. Urine Flush Per Day (UFPD) (under with conservation F+ C) 3 lpcd x 3 times

3. Soil Flush Per Day (SFPD) (under without conservation F- C) 9 lpcd x 2 times

4. Soil Flush Per Day (SFPD) (under with conservation F+ C) 6 lpcd x 2 times

5. Washing (without conservation W - C) @ 20 lpm

6. Washing (with conservation W + C) @ 7.5 lpm

TWRPD: Total water-use reduction per day

Graph showing comparative use of water

(WITHOUT & WITH conservation measures)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

UFPD SFPD WPD %

F-C

F+C

W-C

W+C

TWRPD





21

Mitigation Measures:

S.

No.

Anticipated impacts Mitigation measures / Management

1. • Daily water demand 239 KLD

(87,235 cu. m./ annum).

• Daily fresh water demand reduced by 36% after

implementation of Environment Management Plan which

will be met from PHED water supply.

• The maximum annual recharge will be to the tune of 3,800

cu. m. by harvesting the storm water.

2. • Daily waste water generation:

182 KLD

• Surface / ground water

contamination

• Domestic waste water will be treated in sewage treatment

plant based on FAB technology with capacity of 220 KLD.

• Treated water from STP will be used for flushing (71 KLD),

plantation & general washing (28 KLD) and remaining 65

KLD will be drained.

• STP activity Log book

3. • Monitoring use of water • Water meters will be installed to control the overflow losses

and to monitor the water usage at the following points :

� Fresh water intake

� Inlet of flushing tanks

� STP inlet

� STP outlet

� Landscaping

4. • Un-captured storm water run-

off.

• Flooding or logging of storm

water drains

• The runoff from the building terraces, paved areas and

landscape areas will be channelized to the rain-water

harvesting structures designed on the peak intensity of rainfall

(60 mm/hr) to accommodate peak surface run-off, which will

avoid the problems of flooding.

• The storm-water drains will be cleaned in the pre-monsoon

phase so that the water logging can be avoided.





22

RAINWATER HARVESTING SCHEME:

Baseline Data:

The average annual rainfall (based on last 10 years rainfall data) is 617 mm.

Rain Fall Data (last 10 years):

S. No. Year Annual Average Rainfall No. of Rainy Days

1 2013 757 35

2 2012 907 33

3 2011 646 38

4 2010 750 40

5 2009 377 28

6 2008 572 32

7 2007 553 34

8 2006 407 27

9 2005 392 19

10 2004 805 30

Average 616.6* say 617 31.6

Source: Water Resource Department, Rajasthan

CALCULATION OF RWH STRUCTURES:

S.

No

Type of

Structure/ Surface

Area [A]

(sq. m.)

Run off

Coefficient

[C]

Intensity

of rainfall

(m/hour) [I]

Total discharge

[Q = CIA]

(m3/hr)

1. Roof Top 3416.64 0.9 0.06 184.50

2. Terrace garden 1280.82 0.5 0.06 38.42

3. Landscape 411.57 0.3 0.06 7.41

4. Paved 2945.03 0.75 0.06 132.53

Grand Total (1-4) 8054.06 362.86





23

VOLUME OF RAIN WATER DRAINAGE

Total Rain Water Flow : 362.86 m3/hr

Considering 15 minutes of peak rainfall,

Runoff volume : 90.72 m3/hr

Volume of each pit : 30 m3 (3 m x 3 m x 3.3 m)

Total no. of rain water harvesting pits required : Total run-off volume/volume of each pit

= 90.72/30

= 3.024 say 3 nos.

Therefore, 3 Nos. rain Water Harvesting pit of size 3 m length x 3 m width x 3.3 m depth with PVC

slotted pipe upto minimum depth of 30 m as following figure.

TOTAL RAIN WATER RECHARGE THROUGH RAINWATER HARVESTING:

S.

No

Type of

Structure/ Surface

Area [A]

(sq. m.)

Run off

Coefficient

[C]

Intensity

of rainfall [I]

(m/annum)

Total discharge

[Q= CIA]

(m3/ annum)

1. Roof Top 3416.64 0.9 0.617 1897.26

2. Terrace garden 1280.82 0.5 0.617 395.13

3. Landscape 411.57 0.3 0.617 76.18

4. Paved 2945.03 0.75 0.617 1362.81

Grand Total (1-4) 8054.06 3731.38 say 3800

Total Annual Recharge to Ground Water Regime of the area through rainwater harvesting structure

would be 3800 m3/ annum.

For good design of rainwater harvesting, following points are to be kept under consideration:

• Ideal location with good ground slope.

• The location has adequate subsurface permeability of the aquifer to accommodate maximum

recharge of rainwater through injection well.

• Rate of filtration should exceed average rainfall intensity.

• Clogging of filtration media should be cleaned periodically.

• Ground water pollution does not take place.





24

SOIL ENVIRONMENT:

SOIL ANALYSIS

Location: Project Site ; Date of sampling: 22.07.2014

S. No. Parameter Units Results Test Methods

1. pH (1: 2.5 Suspension) - 7.34 IS: 2720 (P-26)

2. Conductivity (1:5 Susp.) µS/cm 528.0 IS: 2720 (P-21)

3. Texture (Clay) % by mass 38.4 SOP-S/92/16

4. Texture (Sand) % by mass 27.1 SOP-S/92/16

5. Texture (Silt) % by mass 35.5 SOP-S/92/16

6. Colour - Light brown SOP-S/92/14

7. Water holding capacity % by mass 46.0 SOP-S/92/21

8. Bulk density gm/cc 1.18 SOP-S/92/12

9. Chloride (as Cl-) mg/kg 221.5 Ministry of Agriculture

Manual 2011 10. Sodium available (as Na) mg/kg 108.4

11. Potassium available (as K) mg/kg 214.6

12. Organic matter % by mass 0.92 IS: 2720 (P-22)

13. Total Kjehldal Nitrogen mg/kg 769.2 SOP-S/92/06

14. Phosphorous (as P) mg/kg 39.4 Ministry of Agriculture

Manual 2011

15. Zinc (as Zn) mg/kg 6.8 SOP-S/96/11

16. Cadmium (as Cd) mg/kg < 0.1 SOP-S/92/11

17. Copper (as Cu) mg/kg < 0.5 SOP-S/96/11

18. Porosity % by mass 12.4 SOP-S/92/22

19. Permeability - Permeable SOP-S/92/26

20. Boron (as B) mg/kg 0.26 SOP-S/92/13

21. Moisture content % by mass 11.4 IS: 2720 (P-2)

22. Iron (as Fe) mg/kg 8.1 SOP-S/96/11

23. Alkali metals mg/kg 0.85 SOP-S/92/11

24. Lithium mg/kg < 0.1 SOP-S/92/11

*Monitoring report is enclosed as Annexure IV





25

CONSTRUCTION PHASE:

• The solid waste generated during construction phase will be excavated soil (30,000 cu. m.)

out of which, top soil (5,000 cu. m.) will be stored at earmarked places and will be subjected

to temporary stabilization (mulching), while the other excessive soil will be taken by the civil

contractors.

• About 6030 MT of the construction waste will be generated. Details of the same is given as

under:

S. No. Particulars Approx. Qty, (MT) Disposal

1. Wood 414 Sold to vendors

2. Dry Wall 172 Disposal site.

3. Concrete 78 Disposal site.

4. Metal Scrap 17 Sold to vendors

5. Cardboard 129 Sold to vendors

6. Plastics 17 Sold to vendors

7. Electronic Scrap 17 Disposal site.

8. Misc.(Paint, Ceramic etc) 17 Disposal site.





26

LIGHT & ELECTRICITY DEATAILS:

RECOMMENDED LUX LEVELS:

The recommended values of illumination (in Lux) as per the National Building Code of India

(2005) are as under:

S. No. Space Illumination Level (Lux)

i. Entrance 150-200-300

ii. Lifts 50-100-150

iii. Corridor, passageways, stairs 50-100-150

iv. Covered car par

• Floor

• Ramp and Corner

• Entrance and exits

5-20

30

50-100-150

v. Outdoor car park 5 – 20

ELECTRICAL HAZARDS SAFETY MEASURE PLAN

DEFINITION

Electrical Hazard –

A dangerous condition such that contact or equipment failure can result in Electric shock, arc-flash

burn, thermal burn, or blast. Electrical hazard includes ‘dangerous’ meaning ‘able or likely to

inflict injury’; there are high voltage, low current sources that are not intrinsically dangerous, and

there are low-voltage, high-current sources that are not ‘safe’. A ‘harmless’ static electricity shock

could cause sufficient startle reaction to make a worker fall off a ladder. A hazard analysis is

necessary to identify electrical hazards and determine the degree of risk. We are considering

different types of measures for preventing electrical hazards which are as follows:

Safe Electrical Installation

� Installation of new electrical systems to a suitable IS standard. Requirements for electrical

installations, and then maintain them in a safe condition;

� Provision of enough socket-outlets - overloading socket-outlets by using adaptors which can

cause fire.





27

Provision of safe and suitable equipment:

� Proper selection of equipments;

� There will be provision of an accessible and clearly identified switch near each fixed

machine to cut off power in an emergency;

� For portable equipment, there will be use of socket-outlets which are close by so that

equipment will be easily disconnected in an emergency;

� The ends of flexible cables will always have the outer sheath of the cable firmly clamped to

stop the wires (particularly the earth) pulling out of the terminals;

� Damaged sections of cable will be replaced completely;

� There will be use of proper connectors or cable couplers to join lengths of cable

� There will be proper protection of light bulbs and other equipment which could easily be

damaged in use. And also creates risk of electric shock if they are broken;

� Electrical equipment used in flammable/explosive atmospheres will be designed to stop it

from causing ignition.

Reduction of Voltage:-

One of the best ways of reducing the risk of injury when using electrical equipment is to limit the

supply voltage to the lowest needed to get the job done, such as:

Temporary lighting can be run at lower voltages, e.g. 12, 25, 50 or 110 volts;

� Where electrically powered tools are used, battery operated will be safest;

� Portable tools are readily available which are designed to be run from a 110 volts centre-

tapped-to-earth supply.

Provision of safety device

If equipment will be operated at 230 volts or on higher, then the provision of an RCD (residual

current device) will be provided as an additional safety. An RCD is a device which detects some,

but not all, faults in the electrical system and rapidly switches off the supply. RCD will be built

into the main switchboard or the socket-outlet, as this means that the supply cables will be

permanently protected. Additionally a plug incorporating an RCD, or a plug-in RCD adaptor, will





28

also be provided for an additional safety. RCDs for protecting people have a rated tripping current

(sensitivity) of not more than 30 milliamps (MA).

� An RCD is a valuable safety device, never bypass it;

� If the RCD trips, it is a sign there is a fault.

� The RCD will have a test button to check that its mechanism is free and functioning.

Work safely

We will make sure that people who are working with electricity are competent to do the job. Even

simple tasks such as wiring a plug can lead to danger – we will ensure that people know what they

are doing before they start.

We must not allow work on or near exposed live parts of equipment unless it is absolutely

unavoidable and suitable precautions will be taken to prevent injury, both to the workers and to

anyone else who may be in the area.

Underground power cables

Always assume cables will be present when digging in the street, pavement or near buildings. The

usage will be up-to-date service plans, cable avoidance tools and safe digging practice to avoid

danger.

Overhead power lines

When working near overhead lines, it may be possible to have them switched off. So, we will keep

the safe working distance from the cables.

BASIC PRECAUTIONS:

There are various ways of protecting people from the hazards caused by electricity, including

insulation, guarding, grounding and electrical protective devices. We will significant reduce

electrical hazards by following some basic precautions.





29

Insulation

All electrical cords will have sufficient insulation to prevent direct contact with wires. All cords

will be checked before each use, since corrosive chemicals or solvent vapors may erode the

insulation. Damaged cords will be repaired or taken out of service immediately, especially in wet

environments such as cold rooms

Guarding

Live parts of electric equipment operating at 50 volts or more will be guarded against accidental

contact. Plexiglas shields may be used to protect against exposed live parts.

Grounding

Only equipment with three-prong plugs will be used. The third prong provides a

path to ground that helps prevent the buildup of voltages that may result in an

electrical shock or spark.

Circuit Protection Devices

Circuit protection devices will be designed to automatically limit or shut off the

flow of electricity in the event of a ground-fault, overload, or short circuit in the

wiring system. Fuses, circuit breakers, and ground-fault circuit interrupters are

three well-known examples of such devices.

Fuses and circuit breakers prevent over-heating of wires and components that might otherwise

create hazards for operators. They disconnect the circuit when it becomes overloaded. The ground-

fault circuit interrupter or GFCI, will be used to shutoff electric power if a ground fault is detected.

The GFCI will be particularly used near sinks and wet locations. Since GFCIs will cause

equipment to shutdown unexpectedly, they may not be appropriate for certain apparatus. Portable

GFCI adapters (available in most safety supply catalogs) may be used with a non-GFCI outlet.





30

Safe Work Practices

The following practices will be used to reduce the risk of injury or fire when working with

electrical equipment:

� Avoid contact with energized electrical circuits.

� Disconnect the power source before servicing or repairing electrical equipment.

� When it is necessary to handle equipment that is plugged in, be sure hands are dry and, when

possible, wear nonconductive gloves and shoes with insulated soles.

� If it is not unsafe to do so, work with only one hand, keeping the other hand at your side or

in your pocket, away from all conductive material. This precaution reduces the likelihood of

accidents that result in current passing through the chest cavity.

� If water or a chemical is spilled onto equipment, shut off power at the main switch or circuit

breaker and unplug the equipment.

� If an individual comes in contact with a live electrical conductor, do not touch the

equipment, cord or person. Disconnect the power source from the circuit breaker or pull out

the plug using a leather belt.

High Voltage or Current

Repairs of high voltage or high current equipment will be performed by trained electricians.

Individuals who are experienced in such tasks and would like to perform such work on their own

equipment must first receive specialized electrical safety related work practices training by EHS

staff.

EARTHING:

Typical Plate earthling and chemical earthling will be done. Typical layout of the same is given

below:





31

ENERGY CONSERVATION TECHNIQUES:

Energy conservation techniques:

• Total External light load can be reduced by 20% by the use of solar lighting system.

• Total Basement light load will be reduced by the use of CFL/T5 lamps instead of

fluorescent/incandescent lamps.

• Hot water requirements of top two floors will be met through solar hot water geysers.

• Lift load can be reduced by 23% by use of VF drives.

• All capacitors will be provided with Harmonic Filters to avoid distortion in Voltage.

• Automatic Power Factor correction panel with capacitor will be used for Common Load &

Fixed Capacitor for Transformer to minimize the losses.





32

• Insulation of exposed walls and roof will be done to minimize heat gains inside the

building. This will help to reduce the air conditioning demand of the buildings.

• Emphasis will be given on low maintenance, low wattage and longer life in selection of chokes and

lamps for all common area and external light fixtures.

• Details of energy conservation techniques are given as under:

BIODIVERSITY

Impact during Construction:

Destruction and Loss of Vegetation

Nature: The construction phase will require the construction of a small number of access roads as

well as the clearing of perennial vegetation, their service areas and for temporary construction

areas.

Impact Magnitude – Low-Medium

• Extent: Local, the extent of the impact will be limited to the development footprint and near

surroundings. Erosion may however also affect adjacent areas. The footprint of the development

in terms of direct habitat loss will be around 0.37 ha

• Duration: The duration of the impact will be short-term as the majority of impact will remain

until the project is commissioned.

• Intensity: Given the total loss of vegetation within affected areas, the intensity is seen to be low

• Likelihood: As this infrastructure is required for the operation and construction of the facility,

this impact would be occurred.

Impact Significance: Moderate-Minor (-ve)

Degree of Confidence: Medium. Based on the project description, this impact would be occurred.

Mitigation: Mitigation measures to be implemented during the construction phase include the

following:





33

• Areas to be cleared should be clearly demarcated.

• Vegetation should only be cleared when and where absolutely necessary. If possible, vegetative

cover should be left in place. It is preferable to mow the vegetation down to the required height

than to use other more destructive clearing methods such as grading.

• Where construction vehicles must traverse the site, they must remain on demarcated roads. If

vehicles must leave the road for construction purposes, they should utilize a single track and

should not take multiple paths.

• If topsoil must be removed from an area during construction, it should be replaced or used as

soon as possible elsewhere as it will contain seed of local species which will aid the natural

recovery of the vegetation.

• Appropriate erosion control and water diversion structures should be constructed at the same

time as the vegetation is cleared so that the loosened soil is not left vulnerable to erosion.

Operational Impact:

Loss of Natural Vegetation and Threatened Species

Nature: Operational activities would result in a negative direct impact on the natural vegetation of

the project site.

Impact Magnitude –Low

• Extent: The extent of the impact is local due to local and common species observed in the area.

• Duration: The duration would be short-term as the ecology of the area would be affected to

the least until the project is decommissioned.

• Intensity: The intensity is Low as vegetation may still be impacted from operational activities.

Impact Significance (Pre-Mitigation) –MODERATE (-VE)

Degree of Confidence: The degree of confidence is Low.





34

Impact Characteristics: Impacts on Flora and Fauna Pre- and Post-Mitigation Significance:

Impact on Fauna

Summary Construction Operation Phase Significance

(Pre-

mitigation)

Residual

Impact

Significance

Project

Aspect/

activity

Loss of vegetation

associated with site

clearance, road

construction, lay-down

and assembly area etc.

Damage to

natural vegetation

through off-road

movement of

vehicles and

maintenance

activities.

Construction Minor

(-VE)

Minor

(-VE)

Impact on fauna

associated with site

clearance, road upgrade

and lay-down areas,

and increased human

activity.

Disturbance to

fauna associated

with the operation

of the plant and

movement of

vehicles.

Operation

Mammals MINOR

(-VE)

MINOR

(-VE)

Reptiles MINOR

(-VE)

MINOR

(-VE)

Amphibians MINOR

(-VE)

MINOR

(-VE)

Impact

Type

Direct Direct Avifauna MINOR (-VE) MINOR (

VE)

(i) Natural vegetation

within the site

clearance areas.

(ii) Fauna on site

including amphibians

and reptiles.

(i) On-site

vegetation

(ii) Fauna on the

project site.





35

Mitigation: A total of area will be under Landscape/plantation which will help in minimizing the

impacts. Total 85 trees will be planted for the green belt/landscape development. The same is

detailed as under:

S. No. Botanical Name Quantity

1 Polyalthia longifolia (Ashok) 20

2 Azadirachta indica (Neem) 25

3 Dalbergia Sissoo (Shisham) 10

4 Cassia fistula (Amaltas) 10

5 Albizia lebbeck (Sirish) 10

6 Ailanthus sp (Ardu) 10

Total no. of Trees 85

Benefits from Plantation:

Maintaining vegetative cover will help in

o Reducing heat island effect

o Reducing flooding risk by increasing groundwater recharge

o Reducing erosion and polluting surface water bodies

Apart from this, maintaining tree cover will help in improving air quality by

o Reducing pollution

o Reducing dust

o Increasing oxygen content

Keeping native species can lead to cost savings through

o Reduced maintenance due to greater adaptability

o Reduced water requirement

Native plantation will help in

o Attracting native fauna and migratory species creating ‘urban niches’

o Increasing the aesthetic quality of the development without extensive maintenance





36

Conclusion:

Construction projects, whether commercial, residential, public sector or infrastructure projects all

have the potential to damage natural habitats, threatening wildlife and plant species. The

construction industry therefore has an important role to play protecting sensitive sites and

minimizing damage to ecology.

Creating new habitat is generally of less ecological value than protecting and enhancing existing

habitat. However, in this project, local/common plant species will be selected that can provide

important habitat for wildlife, and other appropriate features and creating conditions for habitat to

develop naturally.

Looking towards the existing biodiversity in the study area, no any endangered, threatened or

endemic species exists in the study area, so insignificant impact is visualized on the flora and fauna

of the project site.

Corporate Social Responsibility:-

S.

No.

Activities Capital Cost (in lacs)

1st Year 2

nd Year 3

rd Year

1. Scholarship to meritorious students of Govt.

Higher Secondary school, Mansarovar for

higher education

5.0 5.0 5.0

2. Construction of toilets in the Govt. Higher

Secondary School, Mansarovar

3.0 -- --

3. Construction of rain water harvesting structures

in the nearby parks, temples, school

3.0 3.0 3.0

4. Medical assistance for serious illness 7.0 7.0 7.0

5. Women empowerment and promotion of self

help groups

4.0 2.0 2.0

6. Promotion of skill development programmes

(ITI) including scholarships to local people

2.0 3.0 4.0

Total 24.00 20.00 21.00

Capital Cost : Rs. 65 Lacs (for three years)





37

EXPENDITURE ON ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES:

S. No. Particulars Capital Cost Annual recurring cost

1. Acoustic enclosures & stack attached to DG sets 2 lacs 0.5 lacs

2 STP 35 lacs 5 lacs

3 Rain water harvesting 6 lacs 1 lacs

4 Solid waste management 10 lacs 1 lacs

5 Pollution monitoring -- 1.5 lacs

6 Fire fighting & emergency handling 30 lacs 1 lacs

7 Green Belt 15 lacs 2 lacs

8 Training in the area of environment &

occupational health.

1 lacs 1 lacs

TOTAL 99 Lacs 13 Lacs

*****************************

CONCEPTUAL PLAN & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Documents

Transcript of CONCEPTUAL PLAN & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN