Conceptual Grammar for Analysing Policy Movement Work Group 2: Miguel Lim, Chris Muellerleile, Jana...
-
Upload
rudolph-anderson -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of Conceptual Grammar for Analysing Policy Movement Work Group 2: Miguel Lim, Chris Muellerleile, Jana...
![Page 1: Conceptual Grammar for Analysing Policy Movement Work Group 2: Miguel Lim, Chris Muellerleile, Jana Bajevic, Tatyana Bajenova, Sina Westa, Janja Komljenovic.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080916/56649e675503460f94b627f2/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Conceptual Grammar for Analysing Policy Movement
Work Group 2:Miguel Lim, Chris Muellerleile, Jana Bajevic, Tatyana Bajenova, Sina Westa, Janja Komljenovic
![Page 2: Conceptual Grammar for Analysing Policy Movement Work Group 2: Miguel Lim, Chris Muellerleile, Jana Bajevic, Tatyana Bajenova, Sina Westa, Janja Komljenovic.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080916/56649e675503460f94b627f2/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
WG 2 - Asssigned Texts
• Dryzek, J. (2006). Policy Analysis as Critique.• Hajer, M. and D. Laws. (2006). Ordering
Through Discourse.– In Moran, M., Rein, M. and R. Goodin (eds). 2006.
The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy.
![Page 3: Conceptual Grammar for Analysing Policy Movement Work Group 2: Miguel Lim, Chris Muellerleile, Jana Bajevic, Tatyana Bajenova, Sina Westa, Janja Komljenovic.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080916/56649e675503460f94b627f2/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Asssigned Texts
• Dryzek, J. (2006). Policy Analysis as Critique– “Critical theory is directed at an audience of
sufferers in order to make plain to them the causes of their suffering” (p.192)
– Attention to the linguistic turn and review of techniques to deal with ‘text’
– There are ‘tasks’ for the critical policy analyst
![Page 4: Conceptual Grammar for Analysing Policy Movement Work Group 2: Miguel Lim, Chris Muellerleile, Jana Bajevic, Tatyana Bajenova, Sina Westa, Janja Komljenovic.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080916/56649e675503460f94b627f2/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Asssigned Texts
• Hajer, M. and D. Laws. (2006). Ordering Through Discourse– The central role of the concept of ambivalence– ”Governing is in large a part a matter of defining
the situation” (p.252)– Analysis’ goal: to ‘illuminate the mechanisms that
are used to manage ambivalence’ (p.263)– Analysts’ ordering devices: beliefs, frames and
discourses
![Page 5: Conceptual Grammar for Analysing Policy Movement Work Group 2: Miguel Lim, Chris Muellerleile, Jana Bajevic, Tatyana Bajenova, Sina Westa, Janja Komljenovic.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080916/56649e675503460f94b627f2/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Speaking to Peck et al.
• Mobility (Peck 2011) vs. Coining of policy in situ (Dryzek 2008, Hajer and Laws 2008)
• Both chapters not directly connected to policy travel– evolution of policy analysis as a field and tend to
lean on constructivist side– Commonalities include:• attention to both structure and agency• Attention to ‘social’ reality around policy transfer
![Page 6: Conceptual Grammar for Analysing Policy Movement Work Group 2: Miguel Lim, Chris Muellerleile, Jana Bajevic, Tatyana Bajenova, Sina Westa, Janja Komljenovic.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080916/56649e675503460f94b627f2/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Speaking to Peck et al.
• Rational-instrumental towards embedded-relational
• A. Dryzek (2008): Technocratic > accommodative > critical analysis > linguistic turn
• B. Hajer and Laws (2008): Advocacy coalition framework > framing > narrative and discourse
• C. Peck (2011): focus on the mobility of policy: distinguishing between diffusion models, theories of transition, and neo-diffusionist approaches.
![Page 7: Conceptual Grammar for Analysing Policy Movement Work Group 2: Miguel Lim, Chris Muellerleile, Jana Bajevic, Tatyana Bajenova, Sina Westa, Janja Komljenovic.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080916/56649e675503460f94b627f2/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Speaking to Peck et al.
• Big picture issues:• Critical policy analysis and/vs orthodox
approaches to policy transfer• Commitments of critical analysis (to
‘democracy’, other institutions)• Emerging network society and networked
problem solving
![Page 8: Conceptual Grammar for Analysing Policy Movement Work Group 2: Miguel Lim, Chris Muellerleile, Jana Bajevic, Tatyana Bajenova, Sina Westa, Janja Komljenovic.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080916/56649e675503460f94b627f2/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Speaking to Peck et al.
• Big picture issues:• Peck and Peck and Theodore: rethink the
notion of policy altogether in the context of policies, politics, and policy based "knowledge" that are highly mobile.
• Need for new methodologies to examine
hybrid "policies"
![Page 9: Conceptual Grammar for Analysing Policy Movement Work Group 2: Miguel Lim, Chris Muellerleile, Jana Bajevic, Tatyana Bajenova, Sina Westa, Janja Komljenovic.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080916/56649e675503460f94b627f2/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Further questions
• What should we care about? Sufferers? Is critical policy analysis of policy transfer always about identifying a sufferer? If so, then: who what when where why…?
![Page 10: Conceptual Grammar for Analysing Policy Movement Work Group 2: Miguel Lim, Chris Muellerleile, Jana Bajevic, Tatyana Bajenova, Sina Westa, Janja Komljenovic.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080916/56649e675503460f94b627f2/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Further questions
• A consideration on the ontologies of policy and epistemologies/methodologies for understanding policy. – Do we need a new ontology of policy? – Does the conventional definition of policy help or
hinder our research?