comsegueucesofpeter - University of Utahmilicic/Math_6260/RT_lecture5.pdfcomsegueucesofpeter-Weyl...
Transcript of comsegueucesofpeter - University of Utahmilicic/Math_6260/RT_lecture5.pdfcomsegueucesofpeter-Weyl...
comsegueucesofpeter-Weyl theorem-
Rennert . Uniform version
of Peter -Weyl is strongerthan the E- version (asdiscussed last time)
.
The only place in the proofof uniform version where
we used L'- version is to
show that RCA) differspoints in G .
If G is a lined groupline . a group of matriceslike so in) ) the natural
representation differs pointsof G- and Peter -Weyl theorem
follows immediately fromStone -Weierstrass theorem .
We shall discuss this later
in more detail .-
since RIG) differs pointsof G , for way of E G, g t 1
,
there exists f e R (G) suchthat fCg) t f Ci) .Since f is a matrix coefficientof a finite -dimensionalrepresentation , we get
3
Lemmy .
Let g c- G- , g Fl.
Then there exists a finite -
dimensional representation(it,V) of G- such thatit(g) t I .Now we prove a variant
of a result we proved forfinite groups .
Let (it,V) be a finite-dimensionalrepresentation of G- . LetL . I . > be an arbitrary inner
product on V . Since itis continuous for any u ,o EV
the function
4
g '→⇐Ig)u fatg) o>is continuous . Hence
(ulu ) = fastCg) u ht CgJv> dreg)is well -defined functionon V x V
.
As in the ease of finite
groups we show directlythat C . I . ) is linear in
first and antilinear in
second vanlable .
Moreover, Cutie = (ulu)
and Culm) Z O for n,v E V
Moreover,we have
5
(ulu) = Sg Stig) u IFLg) a>dug) .CTCg)u INg) m> 30 forall g c- G- , and
gi-ktlglultcgso.us iscontinuous
.
Assume that u t O .
Then Lulu> > O . Hence
there existsan open meiglooshookU of 1 such that
Ctlg) ulitlgn> > cou U for some E 70
.
Hence
(ulu) = Sqsntgdnlitcgn>dreg) =
= Su CTIg) u Itcgsu> dy Cg) t6
af,u
etcg) a ITCg) u> dieCg)
Z E Tulu) .Since uw) so it followsthat Lulu) > o .
It follows that ( ulu ) =Oimplies u=0 andC - I . ) in an inner productonV .
Moreover
(it (g)u I tlglv ) == Sqft tht ITIg)u ITChtt (g) re> que h)
7
{sting) ulHugh> dych) == SaitChul Hh) v> dmCah) = Lulu)by the invariance ofHaar measure .
Hence,it Cg) are unitary
operators with respect toC. I .)
,and it is a
unitary representation .
This proves the followingresult .
Proposition Any finite -dimensional representationof G- is unitary (withrespect to an appropriate
8
inner product).Let (it,V) be a finite.dimensionedrepresentation of a-(unitarywith respect toC.I.)) .
Let U be a
G- invariant subspaceof V . Then U is invariantfor all it(g) , g E G -
Hence Ut is invariant
for all it IgE , g E G -
Since it is unitary ,it (g)*= IT(g5
'= it ( g-
'),so
Ut is G - invariant .Hence
,V = U ⑤ Ut is
qa direct sum of representationsBy induction in dimension
of it we prove the followingtheorem .
theorem . Every finite --dimensional representationof Ct is a direct sum
of irreducible representation.
A direct consequence isthe following result .theorem .
Let g E G, get 1.
Then there exists an irreduciblefinite-dimensional representation
Cail of G- such that it (g) ¥ In
10As we remarked
,the
irreducible representationin above theorem is unitary(with respect to appropriate innerproduct) .
Remark .
.
- unitaryLet Ct,V) be a representation^
of a locally compact groupG- on a Hibbert space V.We say that it is irreducibleif the only closed a- - invariant
subspaces of V are to} andV .
If V is finite-dimensional
'l
this agrees with old
definition ( since all finite-dim.
subspaces are closed ) .Wehave the followinggeneralization of the aboveresult
.
theorem (Gelfand -RaiKoo)Let G- be a locally compactgroup . Let g c- G , get 1
.
Thenthere exists are
irreducible unitary representation(it, V) of G- such that Alg) *I .
12The proof of Gelfand -RaiKootheorem is quite differentfrom our discussion .
The essential point ofthe theorem is that we
have to consider infinitedimensional irreducibleunitary representationsof G . Finite-dimensionalirreducible unitary representationsdo not suffice !This can be seen fromthe following theorem .
13
theorem(Segal - von Neumann)Let G- be a noncompactsimple Lie group .
Let
fit,V) be a finite -dimensional
irreducible unitary representativeof G . There (it,V) istrivial .(i. e , V is one
-chin. and
itCgl = I, for all g E G) .
M7,2
Remedy : S L Cn,IR) areK
examples of noncompactsimple Lie groups .