+  

Comprehensive  State  Energy  Planning:  The  “What”   NASEO  Affiliates’  State  Energy  Planning  Taskforce   April  1,  2015

+  Agenda  

n Welcome    Taskforce  Co-­‐Chairs:  Ashley  Duckman,  American  Gas  Associa<on  and  Kristy  Manning,  Missouri  Division  of  Energy  

n Refresher:  What  is  the  State  Energy  Planning  Taskforce?  Sandy  Fazeli,  NASEO  

n Snapshot  of  Content  in  State  Plans  Melissa  Savage  and  Sandy  Fazeli,  NASEO  

n Q&A  and  Discussion  

2  

+  What  (and  why)  is  the  State  Energy  Planning  Taskforce?  

n  Established  to  help  create  a  more  direct  link  between  NASEO  Affiliates’  knowledge  of  the  energy  industry,  technologies,  and  private  sector  best  prac<ces  with  States’  policy  and  planning  exper<se  and  mandates.    

n Will  explore  both  the  “What”  and  the  “How”  of  State  Energy  Planning  

n Kick-­‐off  call:  January  6,  2015,  introduce  structure  of  Taskforce  and  general  principles  of  State  energy  Planning.  Explored  VA  and  MO  plans.  

n New  website  and  co-­‐chairs:  h`p://naseo.org/planning-­‐taskforce    

n NASEO  Staff  to  contact  with  ideas  and  ques<ons:  n  Sandy  Fazeli,  NASEO:  sfazeli@naseo.org  n Melissa  Savage,  NASEO:  msavage@naseo.org  

3  

+  Timeline/Materials  n  Bi-­‐monthly,  discussion-­‐oriented  calls  

n  Goal:  to  create  an  addendum  to  NASEO’s  signature  resource:  State  Energy  Planning  Guidelines:  A  Guide  to  Develop  a  Comprehensive  State  Energy  Plan  plus  Supplemental  Policy  and  Program  Op=ons,    we  will  use  findings  from  bi-­‐monthly  calls  and  case  studies  elevated  to:  n  Develop  a  drag  outline  of  the  addendum,  to  be  discussed  and  refined  on  a  Taskforce  call;  

n  Develop  a  drag  version  of  the  addendum,  to  be  discussed  on  a  Taskforce  call  and  reviewed  electronically  by  Taskforce  members;  

n  Finalize  and  release  to  NASEO  State  and  Affiliate  members  the  final  addendum.  

n  Report-­‐out  from  Taskforce  at  September  2015  Annual  Mee<ng  in  San  Diego,  CA  

4  

+  Taskforce  Approach  

Calls  (Affiliates  and  Guest  States)

Stakeholder  Engagement  Strategies

(The  “How”)

Plan  Content  and  ConsideraOons  (The  “What”)

5  

What  types  of  state  policies  and  programs  work  well  in  your  experience?      What  types  of  state  policies  and  programs  have  created  roadblocks?  

How  would  you  recommend  state  energy  planners  engage  your  company  or  organiza<on  during  the  planning  process?  

DraQ  development  (NASEO)  and  

review  (Affiliates)

Report/PresentaOon  at  NASEO  Annual  MeeOng  (September  2015)

+  Content  in  State  Energy  Plans  Trends  and  State  Examples  

6  

+   Trends  n  Energy  resources  (e.g.,  hydro,  coal,  oil,  natural  gas)  vary  by  state  

n Customer-­‐sited  genera<on  and  demand-­‐side  management  ac<vi<es  (in  the  electricity  and  transporta<on  sectors)  that  are  broadly  applicable  to  all  states    

n Program/policy  op<ons  typically  addressed  include:  n  Energy  Efficiency  n Renewable  Energy  Grid  Integra<on  n Clean  and  Efficient  Transporta<on  n  Financing  Mechanisms  n  Evalua<on  and  Measurement  for  Con<nuous  Improvement  n  Energy  Assurance  and  Emergency  Response  

+  Governor  Involvement  in  State  Energy  Planning:  Michigan  Example  

n March  2015:  Snyder  creates  new  agency  focused  on  energy  www.freep.com/story/news/poli<cs/2015/03/18/new-­‐energy-­‐agency-­‐created-­‐gov-­‐rick-­‐snyder/24965469/  

8  

n  2013:  Governor  Snyder  sets  goals  for  “No  Regrets”  energy  future”  in  media  roundtable  (see  video)  

n  2012:  Governor  Snyder’s  Special  Message  on  Ensuring  our  Future:  Energy  and  the  Environment:  h`p://www.michigan.gov/documents/snyder/EE_Message_FINAL_pdf_404563_7.pdf    

h`ps://youtu.be/YXaHrg2REUg  

+  Minnesota  Energy  Policy  and  Conserva<on  Quadrennial  Report  (2012)  

n  Summarizes  past  policies,  programs  

n  Electricity:  building  base  load;  Increasing  reliance  on  natural  gas  genera<on;  Transmission  infrastructure  construc<on  and  upgrades;  Bulk  energy  storage  

n  Renewables:  Genera<on  through  wind,  PV,  biomass,  hydro;  policies  like  RES;  Programs  such  as  green  pricing,  rebates  

n  Natural  Gas:  increasing  demand;  supply  availability;  price  vola<lity;  service  quality  and  reliability  

n  Transporta<on  Fuels:  petroleum  refinery  opera<ng  prac<ces;  commercial  drivers’  hours  of  service;  alt  fuel  and  advance  vehicle  technologies  

n  Conserva<on:  data,  M&V,  building  benchmarking;  codes;  CHP  

n  Other  priori<es:  affordability;  community-­‐scale  EE/RE  projects;  energy  literacy;  energy  assurance  

9  

h`p://naseo.org/Data/Sites/1/documents/stateenergyplans/Energy-­‐Quad-­‐Report2012.pdf  

+  2014  Drag  New  York  State  Energy  Plan    

n  Ini<a<ves:  n  EE  policies:  refining  rate  and  economic  incen<ves;  using  ratepayer  funds  for  EE  projects  that  

are  economic  but  face  addressable  barriers;  low-­‐income  and  underserved  communi<es  

n  New  business  models  for  u<li<es,  ESCOs,  and  consumers:  resource  diversity;  work  with  wholesale  markets;  demand-­‐side  management;  distributed  resources  

n  Building  codes  and  standards:  training,  progressive  codes  n  Financing:  public-­‐private  partnerships;  green  bank  n  Renewable  portolio:  incen<ves,  reduce  sog  costs;    

community-­‐based  

n  Modernize  electric  and  gas  delivery  systems  n  Community-­‐based  energy  planning:  microgrids  n  Strengthen  liquid  fuels  distribu<on  systems,    

reduce  petroleum  reliance  

n  Promote  consumer  choice  and  educa<on    in    energy  usage  through  improved  data,  labeling  

n  Encourage  innova<on  and  commercializa<on    n  Foster  clean  energy  workforce  

10  

h`p://energyplan.ny.gov/Plans/2014.aspx  

+  Colorado  State  Energy  Report  2014  

n  Priori<es:  growing  jobs  and  spurring  innova<on;  protec<ng  Colorado’s  world-­‐class  environment;  streamlining  government;  encouraging  collabora<on  

n  Efficiency:  weatheriza<on;  HERS;  expand  green  MLS;  energy-­‐efficient  mortgages;  expand  private  and  public  sector  ESPC;  agricultural  energy  efficiency  program;  demand  side  management  

n  Alt  Fuels:  SNG  infrastructure;  EV  deployment;  natural  gas,  propane,  electric  fleets  (2018  goal)  

n  Energy  Resources:  solar,  wind,  landfill  gas,  hydroelectric,  biomass,  geothermal,  coal  mine  methane;  implement  and  accelerate  renewables  by  expanding  RES  

n  Jobs/Innova<on:  recogni<on  for  green  businesses;  promote  career  paths  in  engineering  and  applied  sciences  for  highschool  students  

11  

h`p://naseo.org/Data/Sites/1/documents/stateenergyplans/The%20Colorado%20State%20Energy%20Report%202014.pdf  

h`p://www.kunc.org/post/helping-­‐colorado-­‐dairymen-­‐lighten-­‐your-­‐milks-­‐energy-­‐load  

+  California’s  2013  Integrated  Energy  Policy  Report  

n  Energy  Efficiency:  standards,  comprehensive  retrofits,  zero-­‐net  energy,  engaging  u<li<es,  geothermal  heat  pump  and  ground  loop  technologies  

n  Demand  response:  enable  market  op<ons  to  promote  viable  DR  strategies;  CA  ISO-­‐CPUC  partnership;  customer  educa<on  

n  Bioenergy:  biomass  collec<on  and  distribu<on;  biomass-­‐use  goals;  support  R&D;  refine  procurement  prac<ces  

n  Electricity:  grid  reliability;  promote  inter-­‐agency  coordina<on  to  align  planning  cycles  

n  Strategic  transmission  investment:  increase  par<cipa<on  in  CA  ISO’s  energy  imbalance  market;  reduce  permiwng  <me  for  transmission  projects  

n  Nuclear  Power:  conduct  hazard,  safety  analyses;  evaluate  spent  fuel  storage;  support  federal  efforts  to  develop  an  integrated  system  for  management  and  disposal  of  nuclear  waste  

n  Natural  Gas:  examine  interdependency  natural  gas-­‐electricity;  evaluate  op<ons  for  expor<ng  LNG  

n  Transporta<on:  ZEV  ac<on  plan;  na<onal  Renewable  Fuel  Standard  Goals;  low-­‐carbon  biofuels;  rebates  for  EV,  NGV,  and  hydrogen  vehicles;  op<mize  altuel  infrastructure;    

n  Climate  Change:  research  vulnerability;  RD&D  for  GHG  reduc<on  technologies;  promote  local  planning;  coordinate  among  CA  agencies;    

12  

h`p://naseo.org/Data/Sites/1/documents/stateenergyplans/CEC-­‐100-­‐2013-­‐001-­‐CMF.pdf  

+  Discussion  kick-­‐starters  

13  

What  types  of  state  policies  and  programs  work  well  in  your  experience?      What  types  of  state  policies  and  programs  have  created  roadblocks?  

What  has  been  presented  today  that  you  agree  with?    

What  do  you  disagree  with?  

What  is  missing?  

+  Thank  you!  Key  Contacts:  

Affiliates  Engagement  Lead:  Sandy  Fazeli,  sfazeli@naseo.org State  Energy  Planning  Lead:  Melissa  Savage,  msavage@naseo.org