Composting and Anaerobic Digestion, an overview of trends ... · In Europe the integration of...
Transcript of Composting and Anaerobic Digestion, an overview of trends ... · In Europe the integration of...
Composting and Anaerobic Digestion, Composting and Anaerobic Digestion,
an overview of trends and an overview of trends and
approachesapproaches
D. MaineroWorking Group "Biological Treatment", ISWA
Technical Committee, CIC
Plant Manager, Acea Pinerolese Industriale SpA
Open Workshop “Global Issues pertaining to BioWaste”
March 15th 2012 - Turin, Italy
OutlineOutline
• Drivers• Why choosing anaerobic-aerobic integrated system?• Trends in Europe on AD• A focus on Italy• Conclusions
DriversDrivers……
The “Biowaste Directive”…“The Council of the European Union […] IS AWARE that the issue of biodegradable waste is partially addressed, among others, by Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste, which sets the reduction targets for landfilling of biodegradable municipal waste, and by Directive 2008/98/EC on waste, which invites the Member States, among others, to introduce measures supporting separate collection and appropriate treatment of bio-waste […] ENCOURAGES the Commission to continue the impact assessment with a view to preparing, if appropriate, a EU legislative proposal on biodegradable waste by 2010[…]” from Council Conclusions Green Paper on the management of bio-waste in the European Union 2953rd ENVIRONMENT Council meeting Luxembourg, 25 June 2009The upcoming End of Waste criteria will partially answer the expected “BiowasteDirective”
The “Soil Framework Directive”…In Europe the so called landfill directive (99/31/EC) has created the fundamental push to ban organic fraction from landfill.
EUROPE 2020 A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth…next step Bio - methane?
MSW in MSW in EuropeEurope
Landfill directive gets its target in Europe, from 1995 to 2009 reducing landfill input from 296 to 195 Kg/inhabitants*year
Organic fraction goes not all to composting but also to MBT
Good organic fraction % of recovery are reached
Eco - taxes drives…
(Source: EU MSW 2009 from CIC rapporto annuale 2011)
Biogas: renewable energyBiogas: renewable energy
(Source EUROBSERV’ER – THE STATE OF RENEWABLES IN EUROPE 2011 edition)
Primary production of biogas in the European union in 2009 and 2010 (ktoe).
“[…] In 2010, primary energy production from biogas enjoyed particularly strong growth (+31.3%), it produced more than 10.9 Mtoe in 2010, which is an additional 2.6 Mtoein just twelve months and was primarily channeled into electricity production.
[…] Another type of biogas recovery, bio-methane injection into the natural gas grid, is booming in a number of countries, such as Germany, Sweden and The Netherlands.”
National Renewable Energy Plans EU27National Renewable Energy Plans EU27
National Renewable Energy Action Plan (NREAP), complete fulfillment 2020’s ambitions for biogas source electricity production (64TWh).The application of European legislation on waste that forces the dumping of biodegradable waste in landfills and waste recovery should also help the biogas sector development.
(Source EUROBSERV’ER – THE STATE OF RENEWABLES IN EUROPE 2011 edition)
OutlineOutline
• Drivers• Why choosing anaerobic-aerobic integrated system?• Trends in Europe on AD• A focus on Italy• Conclusions
Aerobe and anaerobe processesAerobe and anaerobe processes
The two processes occur in nature in combination or separatelyComposting turns organic matter into stabile humus, develops excess heat and releases CO2
Anaerobic digestion develops CH4 by mean of several intermediates, no heat is produced, but CO2 is a by-productAnaerobic digestion processes has to be kept completely isolatedComposting processes can take place in open windrowsStrictly anaerobic conditions is most easily achieved in fluidsProper aeration is best obtained in dry materials with structure
Why combining AD and composting?
BecauseBecause……
Waste facilities have to be flexible and robust to be economically feasible – thus fluids and solid treatment needed
Organic wastes are not a uniform well defined material– Impurities are difficult to tackle in a digester– “Solid” organic waste grow acid (malolactic fermentation etc)
creating feedstock for AD– Lignins and other slow degrading organic compounds are not
degradable in AD processesNo organics can be totally turned into either biogas or compost, but
both products are environmental friendly substitutes for either fossil fuels or fertilizers
OutlineOutline
• Drivers• Why choosing anaerobic-aerobic integrated system?• Trends in Europe on AD• A focus on Italy• Conclusions
AD European overviewAD European overview
9.594.446
1.109.800
2.337.430
2.484.716
405.500
3.197.000
202
16
12%
25%
26%
4%
34%
Total capacity (t/y)
MSW + OFMSW + others Biom. treatment capacity (t/y)
OFMSW + other biomasses treatment capacity (t/y)
OFMSW treatment capacity(t/y)
MSW + other biomasses treatment capacity (t/y)
MSW treatment capacity (t/y)
Operating plants
EU nations where AD plants are in operation (2010)
(Source “Biogas e Compost dai rifiuti organici selezionati” Technical committee CIC report)
Germany
29,3%
Spain
29,9%
Italy
7,8%
Denmark
4,8%
France
11,2%
Norway
1,0%UK
0,8%
Belgium
2,2%
The Netherlands
4,4%
Portugal
1,3%Poland
0,7%
Finland
0,5%
Estonia
0,4%
Swedish
1,7%Switzerland
2,2%
Austria
1,8%
Treatment capacity distribution in EUTreatment capacity distribution in EU
(Source “Biogas e Compost dai rifiuti organici selezionati” Technical committee CIC report)
MesoMeso or Thermo, Wet or Dry?or Thermo, Wet or Dry?
2%41%1%55%% distribution
46156142261032388TOT
19%732100600626Not classified
4%1700000017Meso+Thermo
36%135901124002116Termophilic
41%2558031015011539Mesophilic
%BABABABABA
TOTn.d.DrySemi-DryWet
A = OFMSW (+other biomasses)B = MSW (+ other biomasses as well as OFMSW)Wet (<10%TS), Semi-Dry (10 – 20%TS); Dry (>20%TS)Mesophillic (35°C-40°C) Thermophillic (50°C-55°C)
(Source “Biogas e Compost dai rifiuti organici selezionati” Technical committee CIC report)
58
597
32
24
131
7
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Mesophilic Termophilic Meso+Thermo n.d.
plants fed by OFMSW + other biomasses plants fed by MSW + other biomasses (OFMSW included)
European AD thermal distributionEuropean AD thermal distribution
(Source “Biogas e Compost dai rifiuti organici selezionati” Technical committee CIC report)
OutlineOutline
• Drivers• Why choosing anaerobic-aerobic integrated system?• Trends in Europe on AD• A focus on Italy• Conclusions
After a constant growth, MSW production in Italy has stabilized to 32.5 Mtpasince 2006, from then a stable or slightly decreasing
(Source: ISPRA year 2009)
MSW management in Italy: ProductionMSW management in Italy: Production
• Separate collection under constant increase (+2 percentage points every year since 2004); the organic fraction is the main contributor
• Separate collection target of 65% by the end of 2012, confirmed by the recently revised Italian Waste Framework Regulation, and diversion targets further drive biowaste recovery
• Organic Waste separate collection and recovery explicitly recommended by the revised Italian Waste Framework Regulation
(Source: CIC rapporto 2011 – preview based on 50% diversion target)
MSW management in Italy: OFMSWMSW management in Italy: OFMSW
2.192.9491.919.057Total
26,6%584.65523,6%453.000AD + Composting
73,4%1.608.29476,4%1.466.057Composting
OFMSW 2009 (t)OFMSW 2008(t)
(Source “Biogas e Compost dai rifiuti organici selezionati” Technical committee CIC 2010)
281 plants
3.715.000 t
+29%
Composting: a continuous growthComposting: a continuous growth
Shareout of composting facilities with respect to t reatment capacity
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
n.a. ≤5.000 tpa >5.000 tpa;≤10.000 tpa
>10000 tpa;≤20000 tpa
>20.000 tpa
% o
f tot
al fa
cilit
ies
Green composting
OFMSW (and otherputrescible waste)composting
Composting facilities in Italy: treatment Composting facilities in Italy: treatment
capacitycapacity
(Source: Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza 2011)
Shareout of facilities with respect to process tech nology
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Closedbioreactors
Openbioreactors
Bioreactors(not
qualif ied)
turned piles static piles
% o
f ove
rall
thro
ughp
ut
Green composting
OFMSW (and otherputrescible waste)composting
Composting facilities in Italy: process Composting facilities in Italy: process
technologytechnology
(Source: Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza 2011)
First few AD plants in late ’90s - early 2000s treating un-segregated MSW (Ca’ del Bue, Villacidro, Bassano del Grappa, …)Serious operational problems and increase of organic waste availability led them to close and/or turn to source segregated waste treatment
A second start after 2005:
18 waste treatment plants
600.000 ton of biowaste in AD plants in 2009
All plants treat source segregated Waste
Few cases of co-digestion
Almost all plants integrate AD and digestate composting: compost is a product!
(Source: Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza 2011)
AD in Italy: a recent historyAD in Italy: a recent history
2313
DrySemi-dryWet
Solid content
3411
Not classifiedThermophillicMesophillic
Temperature
369
n.a.Two-stageOne-stage
Number of stages
117
BatchContinuous
Batch/continuous
(Source: Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza 2011)
AD in Italy: technological diversityAD in Italy: technological diversity
Digestate composting allows to turn a waste into a product (compost)
Waste purity can significantly affect plant robustness and rejects production
Lower odour emissions than composting only
Liquid waste treatment require a good integration with other plants, and/or
proper layout able to exploit composting evaporation potential
High Biogas potential production from italian Biowaste (mainly due to separate
collection schemes)
High technological diversity available
Lower Ecological footprint than composting only
Lower need of green waste for the aerobic step (i.e. urban areas)
Capital costs higher than composting plants (even double): diseconomy of
scale
Renewable electric energy subsidy (up to 28€cent/kWh till 2012)
(-)(+)
(Source: Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza 2011)
Potential drivers and limiting factors for integrated plants
implementation
Besides:
• lack of space in 54% of plants
• problems with green waste availability in 18% of plants
Data are based on a survey on 22 composting plant (12 North, 4 Center and 6 South), treating OFMSW, 17 in a rural context, 3 in an industrial one and 2 in an urban area.
Source: Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza (2011)
AD integration in existing composting plants: a survey (1)
Besides:
• 54% of plants interested in throughput plant capacity increasing
AD integration in existing composting plants: a survey (2)
Data are based on a survey on 22 composting plant (12 North, 4 Center and 6 South), treating OFMSW, 17 in a rural context, 3 in an industrial one and 2 in an urban area.
Source: Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza (2011)
OutlineOutline
• Drivers• Why choosing anaerobic-aerobic integrated system?• Trends in Europe on AD• A focus on Italy• Conclusions
Conclusions and perspectivesConclusions and perspectives
In Europe the integration of Composting and anaerob ic solutions is becoming a general approach to the biowaste managem ent, thanks to the flexibility of the system that can evolve from MBT or simple composting to
an integrated one. AD has quickly grown in Italy ov er the last 5 years, mainly for the treatment of source segregated biowa ste (OFMSW).
At operating level Integration:
(+) reaches an easier control in odour emission compared to the simple MBT or composting process
(+) needs less surface per treated ton compared to the only compost solution, the strong volume reductions through anaerobic digestion and the homogeneity of the sludge help the aerobic process.
(+) Is a net energy producing process, matching the new issues of the energy market (green energy and energy efficiency title) and economic and environmental drivers are speeding up the fast growing of AD at least in EU countries.
Conclusions and perspectivesConclusions and perspectives
(+) gives an higher guarantee on pathogen organisms control thanks to the double thermic passage.
(-) waste purity impact affects plant robustness and rejects production. The use of biodegradable bags will affect deeply this aspect, reducing plastic impurity.
(-) the ammonia rich wastewater has to be seen, in perspective, as an opportunity for an integrated system that produces compost and nutrient for agricultural use but, up to now, we have no economical drivers to face fossil product cost on the market.
(-) At present, most of the EU countries have only electric energy production incentive schemes. The enforcement of the 2009/28/EC Directive will probably introduce some changes (lower incomes? Granting for heat or biomethane?)
(-) Digestate management criteria: often unclear to local authorities what are the conditions, duration and goals of this step (Upcoming End of Waste criteria will clarify?)