Complexity Research; Why and How
description
Transcript of Complexity Research; Why and How
Complexity Research; Why and How
Sorin Solomon Racah Institute of Physics HUJ Israel
Director, Complex Multi-Agent Systems Division, ISI TurinDirector, Lagrange Interdisciplinary Laboratory
for Excellence In Complexity
Contents
• Complexity as an unifying Scientific Paradigm
• Complexity as Theoretical Applied Science
• How to promote and evaluate Complexity and High Risk / High Stakes Research
Complexity as an unifying Scientific Paradigm
COMPLEXITY= MORE IS DIFFERENT
He meant that When there are MORE then one simple agent (e.g. molecule)
those agents may self-organize in collective objects (e.g. cells)
which have emergent behavior (e.g. life) that IS DIFFERENT from the behavior of the simple agent (e.g. chemical reactions)
(Physics Nobel Laureate) Phil Anderson defined in 1972
“MORE IS DIFFERENT” Complex Systems Paradigm
MICRO - the relevant elementary agents
INTER - their basic, simple interactions
MACRO - the emerging collective objects
Intrinsically (3x) interdisciplinary:
-MICRO belongs to one science
-MACRO to another science
-Mechanisms: a third science
traders
orders, transactions
herds,crashes,booms
Decision making, psychology
Financial economics
statistical mechanics, physicsmath, game theory, info
950C
1Kg
1cm
97
1cm
1Kg
99
1Kg
101
The breaking of macroscopic linear extrapolation
?Extrapolation?
BOILING PHASE TRANSITIONMore is different: a single molecule does not boil at 100C0
Simplest Example of a “More is Different” Transition
Water level vs. temperature
95 97 99 101
Example of “MORE IS DIFFERENT” transition in Finance:
Instead of Water Level: -economic index(Dow-Jones etc…)
Crash = result of collective behavior of individual traders
Statistical Mechanics
Phase Transition
Atoms,Molecules
Drops,Bubbles
Anderson abstractization
Complexity MICRO
MACRO More is different
BiologySocial Science
Brain ScienceEconomics and
Finance
BusinessAdministration ICT
Semiotics and Ontology
Chemicals
E-pages
Neurons
Words
people
Customers
Traders
Cells,lifeMeaning
Social groups
WWW
Cognition, perception
Markets
Herds, Crashes
Chemicals
Ion channels
neurons
brain
Thoughts
Economy, Culture Social groups,
The “MORE IS DIFFERENT” transition often marks the conceptual boundaries between disciplines.
-It helps to bridge them by addressing Within a common conceptual frameworkthe fundamental problems of one of them in terms of the collective phenomena of another.
- MORE IS DIFFERENT is a new universal grammar with new interrogative forms allowing to express novel questions of a kind un-uttered until now
- We need to foster a new generation of bi- or multi-lingual scientists with this grammar as their mother-language.
- We need to recognize MORE IS DIFFERENT interdisciplinary expertise as a crucial tool for future research on equal footing with disciplinary professional expertise.
- develop, reward and support Complexity approach as such.
“MORE IS DIFFERENT” Agent-Based Complexity Research is a fusion of knowledge rather then merely a juxtaposition of expertises
- implies a coordinated shift in the - objectives, - scope and - ethos of the involved disciplines (including healing academic vs. technology / industry dichotomy)Sometimes this caused opposition from some leaders of the affected disciplines which felt that the identity of their science is threatenedby this fusion and shift in scope.
=> To avoid conflict in the future, complexity should be given space and support on its own right rather then sending it to beg or steal from the established disciplines.
Complexity as Theoretical Applied science
Complexity Induces a New relation Theoretical Science Real Life Applications: Traditional Applied Science applied hardware devices (results of experimental science)
to material / physical reality. Modern Complexity rather applies theoretical methods - new (self-)organization concepts and
- (self-)adaptation emergence theories to real life, but not necessarily material / physical items:
- social and economic change, - individual and collective creativity, - the information flow in life
Applications of Complexity are thus of a new brand: "Theoretical Applied Science" and should be recognized as such when evaluating their expected practical impact
EXAMPLE of Theoretical Applied Science
APPLICATION: Liberalization Experiment Poland Economy after 1989
+ MICRO growth___________________
=> MACRO growth
1990 MACRO decay (90)
1992 MACRO growth (92)
1991 MICRO growth (91)
GNP
89 90 91 92
THEOREM (RG, RW) one of the fundamental laws of complexity
Global analysis prediction
Complexity prediction
Education 88
MACRO decay
Maps Andrzej Nowak’s group (Warsaw U.), CO3 collaboration
How to promote complexity and High Risk Research
- The tenure-track can end in tenured (ECIR) European Interdisciplinary Professorships
- Main Task: to host “instant” “disposable” institutes on emerging interdisciplinary / high risk/ high stakes issues
- Researchers will be selected / promoted at ECIR on the basis of their proven expertise to carry out interdisciplinary research as such.
-The members of the “disposable institutes”
will hold Tenure-Track European Interdisciplinary Chairs independent on the fate of the disposable institutes
Thus ECIR will “insure”/“cover” their risk taking
How to Promote Interdisciplinary / High Risk Research?-establish an European Center for Interdisciplinary Research it could be distributed and / or itinerant (like CNRS)
Instruments of the European Center for Interdisciplinary Research
b) 6-12 month interdisciplinary institute programs (500 K €) (buy sabbaticals for professors + bring students)
a) triangle: 2 advisors+ bridge PhD student (100K €) (support summer schools for meeting, visits, fellowship)
c) 3-5 year “disposable” institutes (3-5 M €) university hosting it, should be well compensated
and could keep the institute after the 3 years. participants: local people + students + visitors + holders of the - European Interdisciplinary tenure(-track) chairs to provide expertise with interdisciplinary projects
- gradual, according to how ripe is the recipient subject
- map the interdisciplinary cooperation network(- people are nodes - cooperations andcommon papers, are links).
- give priority to people with high interdisciplinarity
rather then high rank / disciplinary authority
Discipline 2
Discipline 1
Subjects that need synthesis
Objective Algorithm to Evaluate Interdisciplinary researchers relevance
Discipline3
Thus the judges should consider the overall - interdisciplinary - expertise - scientific connections and - past achievements - ease in navigating within dynamic research networks
rather then - individual disciplinary authority and position - ease in managing static large disciplinary research groups
In emergent research situations beyond the known frontiers it is not clear what knowledge will be relevant next.
Thus strong professional expertise in a strictly limited area is less important than the generic capability / know-how to conduct research
in situations of uncertainty and in unchartered trans-/ extra- disciplinary territory
Evaluating interdisciplinary proposals
If you wish to recall just 3 words of the talk:
“instant” “disposable” institutes