Snowmass 14-7-01G. Eigen, University of Bergen G. Eigen University of Bergen Snowmass July 14, 2001.
Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.
-
Upload
crystal-kelly -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
2
description
Transcript of Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.
![Page 1: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Complementary Probes of Dark Energy
Josh Frieman
Snowmass 2001
![Page 2: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
•The History of 20th Century Cosmology is littered with `detections’ of which later evaporated.
•Man (and woman) cannot live by Supernovae alone.
•The implications of Dark Energy are so profound that the SNe Ia results must be confirmed/extended by multiple independent methods with:
* different systematic errors * different cosmological parameter degeneracies
•The Cosmic Microwave Background is not a panacea: it has limited sensitivity to Dark Energy.
![Page 3: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Key Issues
1. Is there Dark Energy? Will the SNe results hold up?
2. What is the nature of the Dark Energy? Is it or something else?
3. How does w = pX/X evolve? Dark Energy dynamics Theory
![Page 4: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Physical Effects of Dark EnergyDark Energy affects expansion rate of the Universe:
Huterer & Turner
Dark Energy may also interact: long-range forces
Carroll
![Page 5: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Physical Observables: probing DE
1. Luminosity distance vs. redshift: dL(z) m(z) Standard candles: SNe Ia
2. Angular diameter distance vs. z: dA(z) Alcock-Paczynski test: Ly-alpha forest; redshift correlations
3. Number counts vs. redshift: N(M,z) probes: *Comoving Volume element dV/dzd *Growth rate of density perturbations (z) Counts of galaxy halos and of clusters; QSO lensing
![Page 6: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Comoving Distance: r(z) = dx/H(x)
In a flat Universe:
Luminosity Distance: dL(z) = r(z)(1+z)
Angular diameter Distance: dA(z) = r(z)/(1+z)
Comoving Volume Element: dV/dzd = r2(z)/H(z)
![Page 7: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Sensitivity to Dark Energy equation of state
Volume element
Comoving distance
Huterer & Turner
![Page 8: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
![Page 9: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Warning
Constraint contours depend on priors assumed for other cosmological parameters
Conclusions depend on projected state of knowledge/ignorance
![Page 10: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Goliath, etal
![Page 11: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Projected SNAP Sensitivity to DE Equation of State
![Page 12: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
SNAP Sensitivity to Varying DE Equation of State
w = w0 + w1z + ...
![Page 13: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Angular Diameter Distance
Hui, Stebbins, Burles
Transverse extent
Angular size
Intrinsically isotropic clustering: radial and transverse sizes are equal
![Page 14: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Lyman-alpha forest: absorbing gas along LOS to distant Quasars
Clustering along line of sight
Cross-correlations between nearby lines of sight
![Page 15: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Projected constraintsfrom redshift space clustering of 100,000 Luminous Red Galaxies(z ~ 0.4)
Matsubara & Szalay
![Page 16: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
CMB Anisotropy:
Angular diameterDistance to last Scattering surface
Peak Multipole
![Page 17: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Evolution of Angular clustering as probe of Angular diameter
Cooray, Hu, Huterer, Joffre
![Page 19: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Volume Element as a function of w
Dark Energy More volume at moderate redshift
![Page 20: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Counting Galaxy Dark Matter Halos with the DEEP Redshift Survey
Newman & Davis Huterer & Turner
10,000 galaxies at z ~ 1 with measured linewidths (rotation speeds)
NB: must probe Dark matter-dominated regions
![Page 21: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Growth of Density Perturbations
Holder
Open or w > -1
Flat, matter-dominated
![Page 22: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Counting Clusters of Galaxies
Sunyaev Zel’dovich effect
X-ray emission from cluster gas
Weak Lensing
Simulations:
growth factor
![Page 23: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Haiman,Holder, Mohr
DetectionMassthresholds
![Page 24: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
R ~ 25 (SDSS South)
R ~ 27.5
R ~ 30
Weak Lensing:
Optical Multi-bandSurveys of Varying Depth
Joffre, Frieman
![Page 25: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Expected ClusterCounts in a Deep, wideSunyaev Zel’dovich Survey
Holder, Carlstrom, etal
![Page 26: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Constraints from a 4000 sq. deg. SZE Survey
Mlim = 2.5 x 1014 h-1 Msun
Holder, Haiman, Mohr
![Page 27: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Weak Lensing:Number Cts of Background Galaxies
Mag
Num
ber (
per .
5 m
ags)
10
10
10
10
7
5
3
1
16 18 20 22 24 26 28
Points: HDFCurve: extrapolationFrom SDSS luminosityFunction w/o mergers
![Page 28: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
R ~ 25 (SDSS South)
R ~ 27.5
R ~ 30
Weak Lensing
S/N > 5 for aperture mass
Assume NFWProfiles
Conservative on Number counts
![Page 29: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Abell3667
z = 0.05
Joffre,etal
![Page 30: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
WL Detected Clusters dn/dz per sq.deg.
z
dn/d
z pe
r sq.
deg
. 100
10
1
.5 1 1.5 2.5 2 3
SDSS
R=27.5R=30
![Page 31: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
R ~ 27.5; 20,000 sq. deg. (co-added LSST or 1-year wide-field SNAP)
R ~ 30; 16 sq. deg.
R ~ 25,200 sq. deg(SDSS south)
Number of ClustersdetectedaboveThreshold
Here,8 = 1(will marginalize over)
(nominal SNAP in SNe mode)
![Page 32: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
SNe
Projected Constraints From ClusterWeakLensing
Large sky coverageis critical
![Page 33: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Cluster Weak Lensing:
Bring in Da Noise,Bring in Da Funk
(account for:projection effectsFuzziness in Mass limit,alsovariations in NFW concentration parameter)
Note: there is more information to be used than N(z)
![Page 34: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Weak Lensing: Large-scale shear
Convergence Power Spectrum
1000 sq. deg. to R ~ 27
Huterer
![Page 35: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Projected ConstraintsFrom Cosmic Shear
1000 sq.deg.R ~ 27
Caveat: systematics in low S/N regime
![Page 36: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
halosClusters,shear
![Page 37: Complementary Probes of Dark Energy Josh Frieman Snowmass 2001.](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022070605/5a4d1ad07f8b9ab05997119d/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Conclusions
Multiple probes of Dark Energy, including SNe, should mature over the next 5-10 years
Independent confirmation of Dark Energy is within sight
Good prospects for independent constraints on the nature of the Dark Energy, with varying systematics and nearly `orthogonal’ parameterdegeneracies