Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal...

25
Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors

Transcript of Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal...

Page 1: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors

Page 2: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Outline

Outline

1. Introduction

2. Case for the Electric Car

3. Internal Rivalry

4. Barriers to entry

5. Substitutes and complements

6. Supplier Power

7. Buyer Power

8. Strategy

Page 3: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Tesla MotorsTesla Motors

• California based start-up company

• Developed a high performance electric sports car

• Initial funding ($60m) provided by PayPal, eBay and Google Founders

• Car does 0-60 mph in about 4 seconds

• Car can travel 250 miles between charges

• First 100 vehicles have been sold at the asking price of $100k

Page 4: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Industry FactsIndustry Facts • Transportation accounts for 63% of Oil

Demand

Page 5: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Industry FactsIndustry Facts

Page 6: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Industry FactsIndustry Facts

• US Automobile Industry represents 5% of Private sector GDP

• 76% of the market is made up of Ford, GM and Chrysler

• 18% of sales are from Japanese car makers

• 6.6m Americans are directly or indirectly employed in the automotive industry.

• Hybrid sales represented 1.2% of the market in 2005, 1.6% in 2006 (est).

• Forecasts estimate 5% of car sales will be hybrids by 2013

Page 7: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Market DefinitionCase for the Electric Car

• Environmental friendliness and low emissions

• High performance

• Improved battery technologies and driving range

• Electric cars are more energy efficient than gasoline cars.

Page 8: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Tesla MotorsEfficiency vs. Performance

Page 9: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Internal Rivalry

A green vehicle:• Reduces consumption of petroleum• Uses renewable energy sources • Has Low emissions• Is Fuel efficient

Within the “green vehicle” market there are four types: • Electric Vehicles• Flexible-Fuel Vehicles• Hydrogen Vehicles• Hybrid Vehicles

Internal Rivalry

Page 10: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Internal RivalryGM EV1 – Early Electric

Page 11: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Internal RivalryHonda Insight – Early Hybrid

Page 12: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Internal RivalryToyota Prius - Hybrid

Page 13: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Internal RivalryTesla Roadster - Electric

Page 14: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Internal RivalryVenturi Fetish - Electric

Page 15: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Entry

Barriers to Entry

• Economies of Scale

• Regulation Issues

• Technological Innovations

• Brand Loyalty

• Infrastructure

Page 16: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Substitutes

• Hybrids

• Flex Fuel

• Hydrogen

• Diesel

• Compressed Natural Gas

• Mass Transportation

Substitutes

Page 17: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Energy EfficiencyEnergy Efficiency

Page 18: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Energy EfficiencyEnergy Efficiency

Page 19: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

ComplementsComplements

• Government tax breaks

• Utility incentive programs

• Free Parking at Airports

• Single Occupancy use of carpool lanes

• No parking meter fees

• 50% discount by California utilities for changing electric cars

Page 20: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Supplier Power

• Lotus main outsourcing partner

• Lotus is providing chassis, body and building Tesla Roadster at Lotus factory in England

• AC Propulsion drive train

• Lithium Ion battery

• Flexibility to adopt new technologies

Supplier Power

Page 21: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Buyer PowerBuyer Power

• Ability of buyer to extract profits from seller

• Green market is emerging

• Buyer power is limited due to lack of competition

Page 22: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

Buyer PowerBuyer Power

Implementation Phase

Vehicle

Technology

Market

Competiti

ve vehicle

Penetration

across new

vehicle

production

Major

Penetration

Total Time

for impact

Turbocharged

Gasoline Engines

5 years 10 years 10 years 20 years

Low Emission

Diesel

5 years 15 years 10-15 years 30 years

Gasoline Hybrid 5 years 20 years 10-15 years 35 years

Hydrogen Cell

Hybrid

15 years 25 years 20 years 55 years

Page 23: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

ConclusionConclusion

• Short to medium term strategy

• Sell 100 Roadsters

• Create recognizable product

• Self funding of future expansion plans

• Change opinion of electric vehicles

Page 24: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

ConclusionConclusion

• Long term strategy

• Focus on brand recognition

• Cost optimization

• Compete in mass market

• Build infrastructure

Page 25: Competitive Analysis of Tesla Motors. Outline 1.Introduction 2.Case for the Electric Car 3.Internal Rivalry 4.Barriers to entry 5.Substitutes and complements.

ConclusionMartin Eberhard, CEO

“There have been tons and tons of companies, for the last 40 years that have tried to make little commuter electric cars. The trouble is that, for the most part, it requires the buyer of such a car to change his or her nature. You’re buying a car that is not as good as an equivalent gas car at all—slower, uglier, with not as much range—and they’re trying to compete essentially on price, where they can’t win. None of those cars were built for people who really like to drive. I get the feeling they’re for people who don’t really think you should be driving, but think if you do have to drive, it should be an electric car. I think if you build a car for people as they are, not requiring them to change their nature, it’s much more likely for you to succeed. And I think our investors agree.”