COMPETITION MANAGEMENTINTEGRAL SOLUTION

Managing amateur/low tiers competitions, with massive participation, is a major issue for sport organizers, that usually lack resources that could be channeled to these competitions, and thus they are a burden on the organizer, which doesn’t utilize their amazing monetization potential.

These competitions, that are far larger than Pro-Leagues, are conducted in an inefficient manner:

1.No income generation strategy: Even though income potential is very high, organizers usually don’t have a clear strategy how to generate income out of these competitions, leading to poor commercial performance.

2.Net losses for clubs: High operational costs and low income generation due to unattractive competitions and no marketing models.

3. No database of participants and fans: This valuable information that can be used for commercial and sportive purposes isn’t stored anywhere and potential income stream is lost.

4. No official App: The millennials live in a digital world. If a competition isn’t accessible enough to reach them, they wouldn’t follow it, leading to a loss of potential crowd and future participants.

5. Lack of video content: We’re living in a visual world. A competition that has no visual content, starting from live-streaming matches to short, on-demand material, reduces significantly its potential followers base.

6. Corrupted image: Lack of available information equals to lack of transparency, that damages severely the public image of the competition and its appeal to sponsors.

In 2002 FIFA declared its interest of increasing the number of teams in the World Cup to 36 participants. The only practical option FIFA had in mind was distributing teams across 9 groups of 4 teams each, but later getting fairly to 16 however FIFA was unable to define a way to fairly and transparently obtain 16 qualifying teams for the second round. A year later, in 2003 Joseph Blatter declared that FIFA was unable to resolve a tournament for 36 teams. It would take FIFA, with all its resources, over 20 years to reach a solution to increase number of participants in its star tournament, and yet that solution has been vastly criticized and contains many threats to the tournament.

7. Vulnerability to manipulations: Combing lack of transparency, with uncompetitive tournament formats, with multiple ‘dead-rubbers’, is an open door for match-fixing and score manipulations, driving the competition image even lower.

8. Vulnerability to manipulations: The world is changing and sport is growing everywhere. Successful competitions attract more teams wanting to join in, yet to enlarge them under traditional competition formats we must double the number of teams, or change completely the structure of the competition in a long process.

CONTENTS

About Us

Research

Concept

Features

Application

Case Study

Our competitive advantage over other systems that provide Competition Management solutions lays in the exclusive usage of our innovative competition formats, that are flexible enough to accommodate all requirements of right holders and overcome the limitations of traditional formats, taking attractiveness, profitability and sport justice to unprecedented levels.

030409111518

Managing amateur/low tiers competitions, with massive participation, is a major issue for sport organizers, that usually lack resources that could be channeled to these competitions, and thus they are a burden on the organizer, which doesn’t utilize their amazing monetization potential.

These competitions, that are far larger than Pro-Leagues, are conducted in an inefficient manner:

1.No income generation strategy: Even though income potential is very high, organizers usually don’t have a clear strategy how to generate income out of these competitions, leading to poor commercial performance.

2.Net losses for clubs: High operational costs and low income generation due to unattractive competitions and no marketing models.

3. No database of participants and fans: This valuable information that can be used for commercial and sportive purposes isn’t stored anywhere and potential income stream is lost.

4. No official App: The millennials live in a digital world. If a competition isn’t accessible enough to reach them, they wouldn’t follow it, leading to a loss of potential crowd and future participants.

5. Lack of video content: We’re living in a visual world. A competition that has no visual content, starting from live-streaming matches to short, on-demand material, reduces significantly its potential followers base.

6. Corrupted image: Lack of available information equals to lack of transparency, that damages severely the public image of the competition and its appeal to sponsors.

In 2002 FIFA declared its interest of increasing the number of teams in the World Cup to 36 participants. The only practical option FIFA had in mind was distributing teams across 9 groups of 4 teams each, but later getting fairly to 16 however FIFA was unable to define a way to fairly and transparently obtain 16 qualifying teams for the second round. A year later, in 2003 Joseph Blatter declared that FIFA was unable to resolve a tournament for 36 teams. It would take FIFA, with all its resources, over 20 years to reach a solution to increase number of participants in its star tournament, and yet that solution has been vastly criticized and contains many threats to the tournament.

7. Vulnerability to manipulations: Combing lack of transparency, with uncompetitive tournament formats, with multiple ‘dead-rubbers’, is an open door for match-fixing and score manipulations, driving the competition image even lower.

8. Vulnerability to manipulations: The world is changing and sport is growing everywhere. Successful competitions attract more teams wanting to join in, yet to enlarge them under traditional competition formats we must double the number of teams, or change completely the structure of the competition in a long process.

About Us

We deliver a complete competition management solution for sport federations, with a centralized, digital management control center, and accessibility to all clubs, players and fans.

Our journey with the organizers starts from optimizing the parameters that define the competition (such as number of teams, matches, total duration, etc.) and its final format, through players, referees and officials register management, providing platform to publish the competition to fans and participants, including real-time statistics and video content.

www.match.visionPhone: +56 9 92385117e-mail: contact@match.vision 03

The format revolution is coming Managing amateur/low tiers competitions, with massive participation, is a major issue for sport

organizers, that usually lack resources that could be channeled to these competitions, and thus they are a burden on the organizer, which doesn’t utilize their amazing monetization potential.

These competitions, that are far larger than Pro-Leagues, are conducted in an inefficient manner:

1.No income generation strategy: Even though income potential is very high, organizers usually don’t have a clear strategy how to generate income out of these competitions, leading to poor commercial performance.

2.Net losses for clubs: High operational costs and low income generation due to unattractive competitions and no marketing models.

3. No database of participants and fans: This valuable information that can be used for commercial and sportive purposes isn’t stored anywhere and potential income stream is lost.

4. No official App: The millennials live in a digital world. If a competition isn’t accessible enough to reach them, they wouldn’t follow it, leading to a loss of potential crowd and future participants.

5. Lack of video content: We’re living in a visual world. A competition that has no visual content, starting from live-streaming matches to short, on-demand material, reduces significantly its potential followers base.

6. Corrupted image: Lack of available information equals to lack of transparency, that damages severely the public image of the competition and its appeal to sponsors.

In 2002 FIFA declared its interest of increasing the number of teams in the World Cup to 36 participants. The only practical option FIFA had in mind was distributing teams across 9 groups of 4 teams each, but later getting fairly to 16 however FIFA was unable to define a way to fairly and transparently obtain 16 qualifying teams for the second round. A year later, in 2003 Joseph Blatter declared that FIFA was unable to resolve a tournament for 36 teams. It would take FIFA, with all its resources, over 20 years to reach a solution to increase number of participants in its star tournament, and yet that solution has been vastly criticized and contains many threats to the tournament.

7. Vulnerability to manipulations: Combing lack of transparency, with uncompetitive tournament formats, with multiple ‘dead-rubbers’, is an open door for match-fixing and score manipulations, driving the competition image even lower.

8. Vulnerability to manipulations: The world is changing and sport is growing everywhere. Successful competitions attract more teams wanting to join in, yet to enlarge them under traditional competition formats we must double the number of teams, or change completely the structure of the competition in a long process.

Managing amateur/low tiers competitions, with massive participation, is a major issue for sport organizers, that usually lack resources that could be channeled to these competitions, and thus they are a burden on the organizer, which doesn’t utilize their amazing monetization potential.

These competitions, that are far larger than Pro-Leagues, are conducted in an inefficient manner:

1.No income generation strategy: Even though income potential is very high, organizers usually don’t have a clear strategy how to generate income out of these competitions, leading to poor commercial performance.

2.Net losses for clubs: High operational costs and low income generation due to unattractive competitions and no marketing models.

3. No database of participants and fans: This valuable information that can be used for commercial and sportive purposes isn’t stored anywhere and potential income stream is lost.

4. No official App: The millennials live in a digital world. If a competition isn’t accessible enough to reach them, they wouldn’t follow it, leading to a loss of potential crowd and future participants.

5. Lack of video content: We’re living in a visual world. A competition that has no visual content, starting from live-streaming matches to short, on-demand material, reduces significantly its potential followers base.

6. Corrupted image: Lack of available information equals to lack of transparency, that damages severely the public image of the competition and its appeal to sponsors.

In 2002 FIFA declared its interest of increasing the number of teams in the World Cup to 36 participants. The only practical option FIFA had in mind was distributing teams across 9 groups of 4 teams each, but later getting fairly to 16 however FIFA was unable to define a way to fairly and transparently obtain 16 qualifying teams for the second round. A year later, in 2003 Joseph Blatter declared that FIFA was unable to resolve a tournament for 36 teams. It would take FIFA, with all its resources, over 20 years to reach a solution to increase number of participants in its star tournament, and yet that solution has been vastly criticized and contains many threats to the tournament.

7. Vulnerability to manipulations: Combing lack of transparency, with uncompetitive tournament formats, with multiple ‘dead-rubbers’, is an open door for match-fixing and score manipulations, driving the competition image even lower.

8. Vulnerability to manipulations: The world is changing and sport is growing everywhere. Successful competitions attract more teams wanting to join in, yet to enlarge them under traditional competition formats we must double the number of teams, or change completely the structure of the competition in a long process.

RESEARCH

We believe in the democratization

of sports, giving exposureto competitions in all levels

Managing amateur/low tiers competitions, with massive participation, is a major issue for sport organizers, that usually lack resources that could be channeled to these competitions, and thus they are a burden on the organizer, which doesn’t utilize their amazing monetization potential.

These competitions, that are far larger than Pro-Leagues, are conducted in an inefficient manner:

1.No income generation strategy: Even though income potential is very high, organizers usually don’t have a clear strategy how to generate income out of these competitions, leading to poor commercial performance.

2.Net losses for clubs: High operational costs and low income generation due to unattractive competitions and no marketing models.

3. No database of participants and fans: This valuable information that can be used for commercial and sportive purposes isn’t stored anywhere and potential income stream is lost.

4. No official App: The millennials live in a digital world. If a competition isn’t accessible enough to reach them, they wouldn’t follow it, leading to a loss of potential crowd and future participants.

5. Lack of video content: We’re living in a visual world. A competition that has no visual content, starting from live-streaming matches to short, on-demand material, reduces significantly its potential followers base.

6. Corrupted image: Lack of available information equals to lack of transparency, that damages severely the public image of the competition and its appeal to sponsors.

In 2002 FIFA declared its interest of increasing the number of teams in the World Cup to 36 participants. The only practical option FIFA had in mind was distributing teams across 9 groups of 4 teams each, but later getting fairly to 16 however FIFA was unable to define a way to fairly and transparently obtain 16 qualifying teams for the second round. A year later, in 2003 Joseph Blatter declared that FIFA was unable to resolve a tournament for 36 teams. It would take FIFA, with all its resources, over 20 years to reach a solution to increase number of participants in its star tournament, and yet that solution has been vastly criticized and contains many threats to the tournament.

7. Vulnerability to manipulations: Combing lack of transparency, with uncompetitive tournament formats, with multiple ‘dead-rubbers’, is an open door for match-fixing and score manipulations, driving the competition image even lower.

8. Vulnerability to manipulations: The world is changing and sport is growing everywhere. Successful competitions attract more teams wanting to join in, yet to enlarge them under traditional competition formats we must double the number of teams, or change completely the structure of the competition in a long process.

Research

www.match.visione-mail: contact@match.vision 05Phone: +56 9 92385117

Managing amateur/low tiers competitions, with massive participation, is a major issue for sport organizers, that usually lack resources that could be channeled to these competitions, and thus they are a burden on the organizer, which doesn’t utilize their amazing monetization potential.

These competitions, that are far larger than Pro-Leagues, are conducted in an inefficient manner:

1.No income generation strategy: Even though income potential is very high, organizers usually don’t have a clear strategy how to generate income out of these competitions, leading to poor commercial performance.

2.Net losses for clubs: High operational costs and low income generation due to unattractive competitions and no marketing models.

3. No database of participants and fans: This valuable information that can be used for commercial and sportive purposes isn’t stored anywhere and potential income stream is lost.

4. No official App: The millennials live in a digital world. If a competition isn’t accessible enough to reach them, they wouldn’t follow it, leading to a loss of potential crowd and future participants.

5. Lack of video content: We’re living in a visual world. A competition that has no visual content, starting from live-streaming matches to short, on-demand material, reduces significantly its potential followers base.

6. Corrupted image: Lack of available information equals to lack of transparency, that damages severely the public image of the competition and its appeal to sponsors.

In 2002 FIFA declared its interest of increasing the number of teams in the World Cup to 36 participants. The only practical option FIFA had in mind was distributing teams across 9 groups of 4 teams each, but later getting fairly to 16 however FIFA was unable to define a way to fairly and transparently obtain 16 qualifying teams for the second round. A year later, in 2003 Joseph Blatter declared that FIFA was unable to resolve a tournament for 36 teams. It would take FIFA, with all its resources, over 20 years to reach a solution to increase number of participants in its star tournament, and yet that solution has been vastly criticized and contains many threats to the tournament.

7. Vulnerability to manipulations: Combing lack of transparency, with uncompetitive tournament formats, with multiple ‘dead-rubbers’, is an open door for match-fixing and score manipulations, driving the competition image even lower.

8. Vulnerability to manipulations: The world is changing and sport is growing everywhere. Successful competitions attract more teams wanting to join in, yet to enlarge them under traditional competition formats we must double the number of teams, or change completely the structure of the competition in a long process.

Research

www.match.visione-mail: contact@match.vision 06Phone: +56 9 92385117

Managing amateur/low tiers competitions, with massive participation, is a major issue for sport organizers, that usually lack resources that could be channeled to these competitions, and thus they are a burden on the organizer, which doesn’t utilize their amazing monetization potential.

These competitions, that are far larger than Pro-Leagues, are conducted in an inefficient manner:

1.No income generation strategy: Even though income potential is very high, organizers usually don’t have a clear strategy how to generate income out of these competitions, leading to poor commercial performance.

2.Net losses for clubs: High operational costs and low income generation due to unattractive competitions and no marketing models.

3. No database of participants and fans: This valuable information that can be used for commercial and sportive purposes isn’t stored anywhere and potential income stream is lost.

4. No official App: The millennials live in a digital world. If a competition isn’t accessible enough to reach them, they wouldn’t follow it, leading to a loss of potential crowd and future participants.

5. Lack of video content: We’re living in a visual world. A competition that has no visual content, starting from live-streaming matches to short, on-demand material, reduces significantly its potential followers base.

6. Corrupted image: Lack of available information equals to lack of transparency, that damages severely the public image of the competition and its appeal to sponsors.

In 2002 FIFA declared its interest of increasing the number of teams in the World Cup to 36 participants. The only practical option FIFA had in mind was distributing teams across 9 groups of 4 teams each, but later getting fairly to 16 however FIFA was unable to define a way to fairly and transparently obtain 16 qualifying teams for the second round. A year later, in 2003 Joseph Blatter declared that FIFA was unable to resolve a tournament for 36 teams. It would take FIFA, with all its resources, over 20 years to reach a solution to increase number of participants in its star tournament, and yet that solution has been vastly criticized and contains many threats to the tournament.

7. Vulnerability to manipulations: Combing lack of transparency, with uncompetitive tournament formats, with multiple ‘dead-rubbers’, is an open door for match-fixing and score manipulations, driving the competition image even lower.

8. Vulnerability to manipulations: The world is changing and sport is growing everywhere. Successful competitions attract more teams wanting to join in, yet to enlarge them under traditional competition formats we must double the number of teams, or change completely the structure of the competition in a long process.

Research

www.match.visione-mail: contact@match.vision 07Phone: +56 9 92385117

Managing amateur/low tiers competitions, with massive participation, is a major issue for sport organizers, that usually lack resources that could be channeled to these competitions, and thus they are a burden on the organizer, which doesn’t utilize their amazing monetization potential.

These competitions, that are far larger than Pro-Leagues, are conducted in an inefficient manner:

1.No income generation strategy: Even though income potential is very high, organizers usually don’t have a clear strategy how to generate income out of these competitions, leading to poor commercial performance.

2.Net losses for clubs: High operational costs and low income generation due to unattractive competitions and no marketing models.

3. No database of participants and fans: This valuable information that can be used for commercial and sportive purposes isn’t stored anywhere and potential income stream is lost.

4. No official App: The millennials live in a digital world. If a competition isn’t accessible enough to reach them, they wouldn’t follow it, leading to a loss of potential crowd and future participants.

5. Lack of video content: We’re living in a visual world. A competition that has no visual content, starting from live-streaming matches to short, on-demand material, reduces significantly its potential followers base.

6. Corrupted image: Lack of available information equals to lack of transparency, that damages severely the public image of the competition and its appeal to sponsors.

In 2002 FIFA declared its interest of increasing the number of teams in the World Cup to 36 participants. The only practical option FIFA had in mind was distributing teams across 9 groups of 4 teams each, but later getting fairly to 16 however FIFA was unable to define a way to fairly and transparently obtain 16 qualifying teams for the second round. A year later, in 2003 Joseph Blatter declared that FIFA was unable to resolve a tournament for 36 teams. It would take FIFA, with all its resources, over 20 years to reach a solution to increase number of participants in its star tournament, and yet that solution has been vastly criticized and contains many threats to the tournament.

7. Vulnerability to manipulations: Combing lack of transparency, with uncompetitive tournament formats, with multiple ‘dead-rubbers’, is an open door for match-fixing and score manipulations, driving the competition image even lower.

8. Vulnerability to manipulations: The world is changing and sport is growing everywhere. Successful competitions attract more teams wanting to join in, yet to enlarge them under traditional competition formats we must double the number of teams, or change completely the structure of the competition in a long process.

Research

www.match.visione-mail: contact@match.vision 08Phone: +56 9 92385117

Managing amateur/low tiers competitions, with massive participation, is a major issue for sport organizers, that usually lack resources that could be channeled to these competitions, and thus they are a burden on the organizer, which doesn’t utilize their amazing monetization potential.

These competitions, that are far larger than Pro-Leagues, are conducted in an inefficient manner:

1.No income generation strategy: Even though income potential is very high, organizers usually don’t have a clear strategy how to generate income out of these competitions, leading to poor commercial performance.

2.Net losses for clubs: High operational costs and low income generation due to unattractive competitions and no marketing models.

3. No database of participants and fans: This valuable information that can be used for commercial and sportive purposes isn’t stored anywhere and potential income stream is lost.

4. No official App: The millennials live in a digital world. If a competition isn’t accessible enough to reach them, they wouldn’t follow it, leading to a loss of potential crowd and future participants.

5. Lack of video content: We’re living in a visual world. A competition that has no visual content, starting from live-streaming matches to short, on-demand material, reduces significantly its potential followers base.

6. Corrupted image: Lack of available information equals to lack of transparency, that damages severely the public image of the competition and its appeal to sponsors.

In 2002 FIFA declared its interest of increasing the number of teams in the World Cup to 36 participants. The only practical option FIFA had in mind was distributing teams across 9 groups of 4 teams each, but later getting fairly to 16 however FIFA was unable to define a way to fairly and transparently obtain 16 qualifying teams for the second round. A year later, in 2003 Joseph Blatter declared that FIFA was unable to resolve a tournament for 36 teams. It would take FIFA, with all its resources, over 20 years to reach a solution to increase number of participants in its star tournament, and yet that solution has been vastly criticized and contains many threats to the tournament.

7. Vulnerability to manipulations: Combing lack of transparency, with uncompetitive tournament formats, with multiple ‘dead-rubbers’, is an open door for match-fixing and score manipulations, driving the competition image even lower.

8. Vulnerability to manipulations: The world is changing and sport is growing everywhere. Successful competitions attract more teams wanting to join in, yet to enlarge them under traditional competition formats we must double the number of teams, or change completely the structure of the competition in a long process.

CONCEPT

An innovative solutionAccessible to all

Managing amateur/low tiers competitions, with massive participation, is a major issue for sport organizers, that usually lack resources that could be channeled to these competitions, and thus they are a burden on the organizer, which doesn’t utilize their amazing monetization potential.

These competitions, that are far larger than Pro-Leagues, are conducted in an inefficient manner:

1.No income generation strategy: Even though income potential is very high, organizers usually don’t have a clear strategy how to generate income out of these competitions, leading to poor commercial performance.

2.Net losses for clubs: High operational costs and low income generation due to unattractive competitions and no marketing models.

3. No database of participants and fans: This valuable information that can be used for commercial and sportive purposes isn’t stored anywhere and potential income stream is lost.

4. No official App: The millennials live in a digital world. If a competition isn’t accessible enough to reach them, they wouldn’t follow it, leading to a loss of potential crowd and future participants.

5. Lack of video content: We’re living in a visual world. A competition that has no visual content, starting from live-streaming matches to short, on-demand material, reduces significantly its potential followers base.

6. Corrupted image: Lack of available information equals to lack of transparency, that damages severely the public image of the competition and its appeal to sponsors.

In 2002 FIFA declared its interest of increasing the number of teams in the World Cup to 36 participants. The only practical option FIFA had in mind was distributing teams across 9 groups of 4 teams each, but later getting fairly to 16 however FIFA was unable to define a way to fairly and transparently obtain 16 qualifying teams for the second round. A year later, in 2003 Joseph Blatter declared that FIFA was unable to resolve a tournament for 36 teams. It would take FIFA, with all its resources, over 20 years to reach a solution to increase number of participants in its star tournament, and yet that solution has been vastly criticized and contains many threats to the tournament.

7. Vulnerability to manipulations: Combing lack of transparency, with uncompetitive tournament formats, with multiple ‘dead-rubbers’, is an open door for match-fixing and score manipulations, driving the competition image even lower.

8. Vulnerability to manipulations: The world is changing and sport is growing everywhere. Successful competitions attract more teams wanting to join in, yet to enlarge them under traditional competition formats we must double the number of teams, or change completely the structure of the competition in a long process.

Concept

MatchVision provides integral solution allowing sport federations to administrate, promote and monetize their tournaments in a centralized, hassle-free platform, enjoying the benefits of using top-of-the-art algorithms formats, as well as innovative automated video solutions that can be used for streaming, on-demand content and even refereeing assistance and training improvement tool.

Our services and platform allow organizers to conduct efficient competitions, retain physical assets of these competitions as video content and user database, increase competitiveness and commercial value of the tournament, produce a transparent image and reach the masses, with minimal resources usage and initial investment.

Our goal is to regenerate the competition brand, and we charge based on revenues generated thanks to our services. Your success is our success.

www.match.visione-mail: contact@match.vision 10Phone: +56 9 92385117

Managing amateur/low tiers competitions, with massive participation, is a major issue for sport organizers, that usually lack resources that could be channeled to these competitions, and thus they are a burden on the organizer, which doesn’t utilize their amazing monetization potential.

These competitions, that are far larger than Pro-Leagues, are conducted in an inefficient manner:

1.No income generation strategy: Even though income potential is very high, organizers usually don’t have a clear strategy how to generate income out of these competitions, leading to poor commercial performance.

2.Net losses for clubs: High operational costs and low income generation due to unattractive competitions and no marketing models.

3. No database of participants and fans: This valuable information that can be used for commercial and sportive purposes isn’t stored anywhere and potential income stream is lost.

4. No official App: The millennials live in a digital world. If a competition isn’t accessible enough to reach them, they wouldn’t follow it, leading to a loss of potential crowd and future participants.

5. Lack of video content: We’re living in a visual world. A competition that has no visual content, starting from live-streaming matches to short, on-demand material, reduces significantly its potential followers base.

6. Corrupted image: Lack of available information equals to lack of transparency, that damages severely the public image of the competition and its appeal to sponsors.

In 2002 FIFA declared its interest of increasing the number of teams in the World Cup to 36 participants. The only practical option FIFA had in mind was distributing teams across 9 groups of 4 teams each, but later getting fairly to 16 however FIFA was unable to define a way to fairly and transparently obtain 16 qualifying teams for the second round. A year later, in 2003 Joseph Blatter declared that FIFA was unable to resolve a tournament for 36 teams. It would take FIFA, with all its resources, over 20 years to reach a solution to increase number of participants in its star tournament, and yet that solution has been vastly criticized and contains many threats to the tournament.

7. Vulnerability to manipulations: Combing lack of transparency, with uncompetitive tournament formats, with multiple ‘dead-rubbers’, is an open door for match-fixing and score manipulations, driving the competition image even lower.

8. Vulnerability to manipulations: The world is changing and sport is growing everywhere. Successful competitions attract more teams wanting to join in, yet to enlarge them under traditional competition formats we must double the number of teams, or change completely the structure of the competition in a long process.

FEATURES

Discover the powerof our services

Managing amateur/low tiers competitions, with massive participation, is a major issue for sport organizers, that usually lack resources that could be channeled to these competitions, and thus they are a burden on the organizer, which doesn’t utilize their amazing monetization potential.

These competitions, that are far larger than Pro-Leagues, are conducted in an inefficient manner:

1.No income generation strategy: Even though income potential is very high, organizers usually don’t have a clear strategy how to generate income out of these competitions, leading to poor commercial performance.

2.Net losses for clubs: High operational costs and low income generation due to unattractive competitions and no marketing models.

3. No database of participants and fans: This valuable information that can be used for commercial and sportive purposes isn’t stored anywhere and potential income stream is lost.

4. No official App: The millennials live in a digital world. If a competition isn’t accessible enough to reach them, they wouldn’t follow it, leading to a loss of potential crowd and future participants.

5. Lack of video content: We’re living in a visual world. A competition that has no visual content, starting from live-streaming matches to short, on-demand material, reduces significantly its potential followers base.

6. Corrupted image: Lack of available information equals to lack of transparency, that damages severely the public image of the competition and its appeal to sponsors.

In 2002 FIFA declared its interest of increasing the number of teams in the World Cup to 36 participants. The only practical option FIFA had in mind was distributing teams across 9 groups of 4 teams each, but later getting fairly to 16 however FIFA was unable to define a way to fairly and transparently obtain 16 qualifying teams for the second round. A year later, in 2003 Joseph Blatter declared that FIFA was unable to resolve a tournament for 36 teams. It would take FIFA, with all its resources, over 20 years to reach a solution to increase number of participants in its star tournament, and yet that solution has been vastly criticized and contains many threats to the tournament.

7. Vulnerability to manipulations: Combing lack of transparency, with uncompetitive tournament formats, with multiple ‘dead-rubbers’, is an open door for match-fixing and score manipulations, driving the competition image even lower.

8. Vulnerability to manipulations: The world is changing and sport is growing everywhere. Successful competitions attract more teams wanting to join in, yet to enlarge them under traditional competition formats we must double the number of teams, or change completely the structure of the competition in a long process.

Features

Registration

MatchVision services and platform give an integral solution for Right Holders (e.g., national football association) to design, conduct and publish content for sport competitions, such as leagues and cups.

Allowing federations to register and have one centralized database containing all participants – clubs, teams, players, staff, officials, commissioners, stadiums/courts and registered fans.

Competition DesignUsing MatchVision innovative Competition Formats, we design for each competition a tailored made solution, optimizing competition defining parameters (number of teams, match-days and matches), reviewing calendar and ensuring high value – high interest matches, as well as reducing probability of match-fixing.

01

02

www.match.visione-mail: contact@match.vision 12Phone: +56 9 92385117

Features

Competition ManagementAllowing federations to manage every aspect of the competition – fixtures, officials and commissioners’ assignment, pre-match players/staff accreditation, live results, statistics regarding clubs and players, tables and others.

Automated Video PlatformOfficial matches played on fields where automated video equipment is installed are automatically recorded and uploaded to the platform, featuring both live streaming and on-demand content for users, as well as performance analytics of players.

03

04

www.match.visione-mail: contact@match.vision 13Phone: +56 9 92385117

Features

Full access from any devicefor all registered users

Fixtures, results and tables, including live updates from all matches, as well as explanation videos, allowing users to follow easily the tournament in the official app and not 3rd party websites (press etc.)

Minute by Minute

Users can gain access to recorded full-matches, match highlights and individual player highlights, to get more in-depth content regarding the tournament and its participants.

On Demand Content

Users can see live action from different stadiums even simultaneously, depending on installment of automated video equipment.

Live Streaming

Users can follow the performance of every player, both regarding official statics (minutes players, card, goals scored, etc.) and performance analytics introduced by the automated filming platform.

Player Statistics

www.match.visione-mail: contact@match.vision 14Phone: +56 9 92385117

APPLICATION

We are ready to start the game

ApplicationApplicationREGISTRATIONMANAGER

Staff

Officials Stadiums Locations Commissioners

Players Teams Club Page

www.match.visione-mail: contact@match.vision 16

Super AdminClub Admin

Phone: +56 9 92385117

ApplicationCOMPETITION MANAGER

Fixture

Add TeamsAdd OfficialsAdd LocationsSetup Calendar

Phases Statistics Rules Teams Videos

OfficialReport

Players StatsTeams StatsAttendanceOccurrencesLive

Action

Aprove SquadsStart MatchRecord ActionsFollow Stats LiveTerminate Match

www.match.visione-mail: contact@match.vision 17Phone: +56 9 92385117

ApplicationApplicationEND USERVIEW

Tournament Teams Statistics

Fixtures Videos Rules

CLUBS / TEAMS

UP COMING MATCHES

TABLES & BRACKETS

FIXTURES & RESULTS

TEAMS

VIDEOS

RULES

FIXTURES

TEAM STATS

PLAYER STATS

VIDEOS

PLAYER OF WEEK

PERSONALIZED MATERIAL

COMPETITION VIEW

www.match.visione-mail: contact@match.vision 18Phone: +56 9 92385117

CASE STUDY

Learn how we radically changed world's biggest

football competition

COPA PERÚ 2015OLD FORMAT

Regional and national stages lasted over a period of 17 weeks with a total of 165 matches.Tie-breakers for the regional stage were: goal difference, goals scored, head-to-head, coin toss.No tournament sponsors, only semi-final and final have been broadcasted.

NATIONAL STAGE16 teamsTwo knock-out roundsManaged by Peruvian Football Federation

REGIONAL STAGE50 teams8 groupsRotational league mgmt

PRELIMINARY STAGESTournaments (group format) of local leagues managed by local federations.

DecemberNovemberOctoberSeptemberJulyJune

PROVINCIALDISTRICTS DEPARTAMENTS

February

Copa Peru is a national football tournament and one of the biggest of its kind in terms of participating teams. Its winner gets promoted to the professional First Division and its 2nd placed gets promoted to the Second Division.

www.match.visione-mail: contact@match.vision 20

Case Study

Phone: +56 9 92385117

!

!

!

!

!

!

!! Rotational changes in responsibilities for the regional stage resulted in inconsistent formats and questionable decisions by referees.

Long travel-hours for regions with many departments.

Some teams played very few matches (as low as 2), leading to low revenue and playtime.

Different numbers of departments per region lead to varying probabilities of reaching the national stage.

With 25 departments and only 16 qualified teams, not all departments were represented in the national stage.

Unbalanced matches due to regional clustering - some teams withdrew from the competition as they lost the opportunity to qualify for the next stage very early (e.g. 7 teams withdrew in 2014).

Teams participated in score manipulations and lost on purpose to avoid certain opponents in the next round.

Tie-Breaker rules incentivised match-fixing, e.g. bribery of goalkeepers to ensure a high number of goals scored.

MAIN ISSUES

www.match.visione-mail: contact@match.vision 21

Case Study

Phone: +56 9 92385117

REPECHAGEFirst stage placed 9th to 24th play a repechage, 9th vs. 24th, 10th vs. 23rd, etc.Top 8 teams proceed to final stage.

FINAL STAGERound of 16 – finalIn case of draw: team with better standing in first stage proceeds (no overtime / shoot-out)

FIRST STAGEEach team plays against 3 rivals (Two Pots: 1st placed vs. 2nd placed of departmental stage, home & away matches)Draw of matches is location basedTop 8 teams proceed to final stage

NATIONAL STAGE50 teams – 2 for each department (1st & 2nd placed)Managed by FPF*

PRELIMINARY STAGESTournaments (group format) of local leagues.All preliminary stages are managed by the local federations.

NovemberOctoberSeptemberJulyJune

20162015

PROVINCIALDISTRICTS DEPARTAMENTS

February

COPA PERÚ 2015NEW FORMAT

www.match.visione-mail: contact@match.vision 22

Case Study

Phone: +56 9 92385117

The centralized management of the tournament increases transparency and consistency of rules and calendar.

Teams travel less due to shorter distances.

All teams play the same minimum number of matches.

All teams have equal chances to qualify for the next stage.

Ongoing negotiations for significant sponsoring.

Integration of all departments into the national stage.

Practically all teams have the chance to qualify for the next stage until their last match, thus always have an incentive to win at every stage of the tournament.

Incentive to win every match diminishes the incentives for score manipulation and strategic match-fixing (probability of less than 4%).

Score manipulations become less relevant due to Relative Points © as tie-breakers.

Case Study

BENEFITS

www.match.visionPhone: +56 2 2233 0344e-mail: contact@match.vision 23

WWW.MATCH.VISION