Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

26
Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology

Transcript of Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Page 1: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Comparing welfare systems

Week 18

Comparative Sociology

Page 2: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Notices

• Reading for next week is:

• Parkhurst J (2005) 'Health system factors influencing maternal health services: a four country comparison' Health Policy 73 (2) 127-138

• Key Reading for week 21 is only now available by hard copy. An alternative is:

• Joppke C (1999) ‘How immigration is changingcitizenship: a comparative view’ Ethnic and Racial Studies 22 (4) 629–652

Page 3: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Recap

• Looked at the different models of capitalism

• Considered theories that nation-states have particular cultures

• Look at the idea of culture-clash

Page 4: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Outline

• What are welfare systems?

• ‘Three worlds of welfare capitalism’• Liberal• Conservative • Social democratic

• The case of lone-motherhood

Page 5: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

What are welfare systems

• The provision that nation-states make for those that are unable to care for themselves:

– Sickness– Old-age– Housing– Education– Unemployment

• A contract between governments and peoples- (citizenship)

Page 6: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Early welfare systems

• Prior to 19th century largely individual benefactors and religious organisations –local provision

• Rise of industrialization • Fears of social disorder led to new forms of

provision– 1834 Poor Law in the UK– Bismarck Social Insurance in Germany

• Fears of ‘race’ degeneration and rise of eugenics

Page 7: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

1834 Poor Law

• Provision for paupers – ‘indoor relief’

• Setting up of Workhouses

• Stigma

• ‘Respectable poor’ could be entitled to outdoor relief

Page 8: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Bismarck Social Insurance

• Compulsory insurance for workers• Sickness• Accidents• Old age• Invalidity

• Contributory scheme– Initially contributions only form

workers– Later state contributions added

• Widely copied over Europe

Page 9: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Welfare Capitalism

• Following the second world war many western states expanded or developed their welfare systems

• UK Beveridge Report identified five giants to be eliminated

• Disease• Ignorance• Squalor• Idleness• Want

Page 10: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Welfare Questions

• To what extent are the ‘poor’ responsible for their poverty?

• Does welfare create dependency?

• Who should be entitled to welfare provision?

Page 11: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Welfare Questions

• Discuss with the person sitting next to you: the questions of welfare

• To what extent are the ‘poor’ responsible for their poverty?

• Does welfare provision create dependency?

• Who should be entitled to welfare provision?

Page 12: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

‘Three worlds’

• Esping-Anderson identified three ideal types of welfare capitalism

– Liberal– Conservative– Social Democratic

• These relate to wider ideas in nation-states about the economy, equality and the family

Page 13: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Liberal

• Related to liberal ideas about the economy– Individualism – Modest social insurance– Means-tested benefits– Minimum entitlement– Stigma

• The US, Australia and UK

Page 14: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Liberal welfare reform

• Does reducing welfare end dependency or make poverty worse?

Page 15: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Corporatist

• Family-based entitlement– Less emphasis on the market – Rights are related to class and status

• Occupational benefits• Emphasis on breadwinners

– Basic provision – but no redistribution of income– Traditional family structures preserved

• France, Germany, Italy

Page 16: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Promoting Gender/Racial Inequality?

• Security of main breadwinner – Inadequate provision for women & minority-

ethnic groups who have a less secure relationship to labour market

• Minimum services for

children, elderly, less-abled– Assumption of women as carers

Page 17: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Social Democratic

• Aim to promote equality through social programmes– Universal benefits– Comprehensive benefits– High standards not minimum needs

• Sweden, Norway, Denmark

Page 18: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

High Cost

• High taxation rates to pay for universal benefits

• Based on near full-employment

• Economic changes have forced cuts in benefits

Page 19: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

• Discuss these three different models of welfare. Which system do you think is the best overall?

Page 20: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Support for Lone Mothers

• Liberal – Stigmatised as ‘welfare queens’ or

‘scroungers’– Drain on public funds– Benefits minimum

• To prevent lone motherhood • Emphasis on finding work• Making fathers pay

– Child Support Agency UK

Page 21: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Corporatist

• Breadwinner model of social insurance does not adapt easily to other family forms– Compulsory maintenance payments from fathers in

Germany• Lone mothers have to rely on lower paying

‘assistance’ benefits rather than ‘insurance’ benefits

• Minimum provision of childcare• Lone motherhood a ‘risk’ but not

deviant

Page 22: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Social Democratic

• Women as citizen-workers– Generous state support – Childcare easily available– Parental leave schemes

• Lone motherhood not stigmatized

• No obligation to ‘name’ father

Page 23: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Different models

• Discuss with the person sitting next to you the advantages and disadvantages of each welfare model in relation to lone motherhood.

Page 24: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Cultural Assumptions

• Liberal and Corporatists models see women primarily as mothers rather than workers– Dependency should be on men rather than the state

• Social Democratic models see women as workers– Lone parenthood per se not an issue, but family-

friendly models needed to ensure women can participate in the labour market

Page 25: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Summary

• Considered the development of welfare systems

• Looked at Esping-Anderson’s three different models

• Shown how capitalism and culture shape welfare provision.

Page 26: Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.

Next week

• Looking at healthcare systems

• Relating this to the models of welfare outlined today

• Continuing to consider the role of capital and culture