Comparing Sapflow Methods: Granier vs. Heat Ratio
description
Transcript of Comparing Sapflow Methods: Granier vs. Heat Ratio
Comparing Sapflow Methods: Granier vs.
Heat Ratio
Clarissa Lyons (Smith College 2013)Kate Bussell (Transylvania University
2012)
Motivation
Slide courtesy of Matt Green
Forest Water Balance
Intro, cont. Two different methods are being
employed in the MELNHE plots: the Granier method and the heat ratio method (HRM)
Heat-based sapflow techniques are the most widely used methods for sapflow measurement
Heat Ratio Method An improvement of the compensation
heat pulse method by Burgess et al. (2001)
Method being used by researchers at UNH, led by Heidi Asbjornsen
Measures the ratio of the increase in temperature at points equidistant from the line heater following the release of a heat pulse
Below: Thermocouple placement within sensor
Sapflow tree in Bartlett Experimental Forest (C8)
Granier Method Developed by André Granier in 1985 Method used by Dr. Michele Pruyn
and team from PSU Constant heat source Sapflow calculated from difference in
temperature between two thermocouples
229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 2390
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40Sugar Maple 1
Heat Ratio MethodGranier Method
Ordinal Date and Time
Sap
flow
(g
/m2
/s)
Comparison Results
229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 2390
2
4
6
8
10
12 Sugar Maple 2
Heat Ratio MethodGranier Method
Ordinal Date and Time
Sap
flow
(g
/m2
/s)
Results, cont.
Special Thanks to Our Contributors
Dr. Michele Pruyn, Assistant Professor of Plant Biology, Plymouth State University
Adan Hernandez, Graduate Student, University of New Hampshire
Dr. Heidi Asbjornsen, Associate Professor of Ecosystem Ecology, University of New Hampshire
Dr. Ruth Yanai, Professor of Forest and Natural Resources Management, SUNY ESF
Craig See, Master’s Student, SUNY ESF Mark Green, Assistant Professor of Hydrology,
Plymouth State University
References Burgess, S.O. et al. (2001). An improved heat pulse
method to measure low and reverse rates of sap flow in woody plants. Tree Physiology, 21, 589-598.
Granier, A. et al. (1996). Transpiration of trees and forest stands: short and long-term monitoring using sapflow methods. Global Change Biology, 2, 265-274.
Granier, A. et al. (1987). Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiology, 3, 309-320.
Kostner, B. et al. (1998). Sapflow measurements in forest stands: methods & uncertainties. Annals of Forest Science, 55, 13-27.