Compare options: simulations recent history Cloud density near (r=1mm) beam (m -3 ) before bunch...
-
Upload
victoria-nicholson -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of Compare options: simulations recent history Cloud density near (r=1mm) beam (m -3 ) before bunch...
Compare options: Compare options: simulations recent historysimulations recent historyCompare options: Compare options: simulations recent historysimulations recent history
Cloud density near (r=1mm) beam (m-3) before bunch passage, values are taken at a cloud equilibrium density. Solenoids decrease the cloud density in DRIFT regions, where they are only effective. Compare options LowQ and LowQ+train gaps. All cases wiggler aperture 46mm.
Electron Cloud: need for mitigation
Outstanding Questions about key remedies:
1) Are thin film coatings effective to stably decrease SEY < 1.2 ? Is “conditioning” effective to stably decrease SEY < 1.2 ?
2) Fins: are fin-chambers viable to suppressing electron cloud in magnets ?
(resolve simulation discrepancy)
3) Clearing electrodes: is RF power load tolerable ? are impedance and HOM tolerable ?
ILC DAMPING RING R&D OBJECTIVES
2.2.3 Electron Cloud
2.2.3.1 Characterize electron-cloud build-upRequired for Baseline Priority: 12.2.3.2 Develop electron-cloud suppression techniquesRequired for Baseline Priority: 12.2.3.3 Develop modeling tools for e-cloud instabilitiesRequired for Baseline Priority: 1 2.2.3.4 Determine electron-cloud instability thresholdsRequired for Baseline Priority: 1
2.2.4 Ion Effects
2.2.4.1 Characterize ion effectsRequired for Baseline Priority: 1 2.2.4.2 Specify techniques for suppressing ion effectsRequired for Baseline Priority: 1
COLLECTIVE INSTABILITIES: PRIORITIES
4
Electron cloud issues: Milestones
1. Test clearing electrodes
(a) characterize impedance, HOM, power load
(b) machine studies
2. Test groove concepts
(a) characterize impedance, HOM, power load
(b) machine studies
3. Test coating techniques
(a) Secondary electron yield measurements
(b) machine studies
4. Characterize the electron cloud build up
5. Characterize the electron cloud instability
6. Integrated modeling: cloud, impedance, space charge..
Investigate alternative solutions
5
Ion issues: Milestones
1. Characterize ion effects
2. Specify techniques for suppressing ion effects
R&D MILENSTONES
TOWARDS A
TECHNICAL DESIGN REPORT TDR (2008)
7
Electron cloud issues: MilestonesTest clearing electrodes
(a) characterize impedance, HOM, power load
analytical estimates
simulate MAFIA, A. Krasnyhk, Cho Ng
simulate with VORPAL, V. Ivanov (?)
simulate, F. Caspers
(b) machine studiestest in HCX in a quadrupole or drift region, A. Molvik
test in ESA preliminary to PEPII installation, M. Pivi,
test in PEPII in bend chicane, M. Pivi
test in CESR in wiggler section, M. Palmer
test in KEKB arc section bend or wiggler section, Y. Suetsugu
test in LHC arc section bend section, F. Caspers
(c) develop diagnostic electron cloud diagnostic for test chambers, A. Molvik
electron cloud diagnostic for test chambers, R. Macek
8
Electron cloud issues: Milestones
Test groove concepts
(a) characterize impedance, HOM
K. Bane numerical estimation, G. Stupakov analytical
(b) machine studies
rectangular grooves drift SLAC, M. Pivi
triangular grooves in bend section SLAC, M.Pivi
triangular grooves in wiggler section CESR, M. Palmer
(c) develop diagnostic
electron cloud diagnostic for test chambers, A. Molvik
electron cloud diagnostic for test chambers, R. Macek
9
Electron cloud issues: Milestones
Test coating techniques and determine conditioning effectiveness
(a) Secondary electron yield measurements
measuring SEY, Y. Suetsugu
measuring SEY, R. Kirby
measuring SEY, (N. Hilleret)
(b) machine studies
installation of test chambers in KEKB Cu, TiN, NEG, Y. Suetsugu
SEY conditioning test in PEP-II, M. Pivi
Installation of chambers in CESR, M. Palmer
(c) manufacturing and diagnostics
building chambers for installations, S. Marks
10
Electron cloud issues: Investigators
Characterize the electron cloud build up
wiggler 3D simulations CLOUDLAND, L. Wang
wiggler 3D simulations WARP/POSINST, C. Celata
characterize ecloud in quadrupole, M. Pivi
characterize ecloud in quadrupole, C. Celata
fill pattern as possible mitigation, M. Venturini
compile e-cloud density over the machine, M. Pivi
optimize clearing electrode design, (Cornell)
optimize clearing electrode design, L. Wang
optimize clearing grooves design, W. Bruns
optimize clearing grooves design, L. Wang
optimize clearing grooves design, M. Venturini
11
Electron cloud issues: Milestones
Characterize the electron cloud instabilityCharacterize single-bunch instability PEHTS, K. Ohmi
Characterize single-bunch instability HEAD-TAIL, F. Zimmermann
Characterize single-bunch instability quasi-static QUICKPIC, P. Spentzouris
Characterize single-bunch instability in wiggler 3D WARP, C. Celata
Characterize single-bunch instability in lattice CMAD, M. Pivi
12
Electron cloud issues: Milestones
6. Integrated modelingCharacterize instability FRAMEWORK, P. Spentzouris
13
Electron cloud issues: Timescale
Test clearing electrodes
In PEP-II by 2007
In CESR by 2008
Test groove concepts
In PEP-II by 2007
In CESR by 2008
Test coating techniques
In KEKB, by 2007
In PEPII, by 2007
In CESR, by 2008
Characterize the electron cloud build up
Compile list of electron cloud density in ring by 2007
Characterize the electron cloud instability
by TDR
Integrated modeling
by TDR
14
Ion issues: Milestones
1. Characterize ion effects
to be discussed
2. Specify techniques for suppressing ion effects
to be discussed
15
Ion issues: Timescale
1. Characterize ion effects
by date …
2. Specify techniques for suppressing ion effects
by date …