Comparative Governments & Politics · AP Comparative Government Mr. Searcy Nationalism Nationalism...
Transcript of Comparative Governments & Politics · AP Comparative Government Mr. Searcy Nationalism Nationalism...
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
Country A country is a region identified as a distinct
entity in political geography. A country may be an independent sovereign state or one that is occupied by another state, as a non-sovereign
or formerly sovereign political division, or a geographic region associated with sets of
previously independent or differently associated peoples with distinct political
characteristics. Wikipedia
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
1. History 2. Institutions 3. Political Culture 4. Patterns of Interaction 5. Quarrels (long term political issues)
Through the filters of Nationalism & Ideology.
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
Ideology
Belief system to improve society. Ideology is a set of conscious and/or unconscious ideas which constitute one's goals, expectations, and actions. An ideology is a comprehensive normative vision, a way of looking at things. Wikipedia
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
Nationalism
Nationalism is a belief, creed or political ideology that involves an individual identifying with, or becoming attached to, one's nation. Nationalism involves national identity, by contrast with the related construct of patriotism, which involves the social conditioning and personal behaviors that support a state's decisions and actions.
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
History
The whole series of past events connected with someone or
something. Oxford Dictionary
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
Institutions
Established rules and relationships of power.
Ex. Political, Economic, Social, Educational, Cultural, Military/Security,
etc…
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
Political Culture
Values and attitudes of citizens on politics and society.
As defined by the International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences: "the set of attitudes, beliefs and sentiments that
give order and meaning to a political process and which provide the underlying assumptions and rules that govern
behavior in the political system".
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
Political Culture
“Political Culture is the product of both the collective history of a political system and
the life histories of the members of the system and thus it is rooted equally in public events and private experience.”
International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
Patterns of Interaction
How the game is played.
How the country and its institutions interact internally (domestically) and
externally (internationally).
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
1. Iran 2. China 3. Nigeria 4. United Kingdom 5. Russia 6. Mexico
The Six Countries Studied
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
Country Analysis
• Profile Overview (Group/Class)
Utilizing the Georgia Virtual School AP Comparative Government Resources & Other Sources
• General S.W.O.T. Analysis (Group/Class)
• Forecast Future Issues/Challenges (Group Project)
• Positional Response (Individual Project)
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
Profile Overview
We will look at country profiles and information from various sources in order to create a basis from which to establish a basic overview and understanding of the six (6) countries
being studied.
We will do this through class and group discussions.
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
Discussion Rules
All class and group discussions will be objective, fact based/substantiated discussions with any opinions or
personal positions requiring fact-based support and must be relevant/applicable to the overall country discussion.
No unsubstantiated or shallow “drive by grenades” are allowed. All discussions and opinions are welcome as long as they are relevant, applicable, and substantiated…using the
3P’s of Information as a guide.
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
S.W.O.T. Traditionally used in analyzing companies. We are
Going to modify it and use the SWOT concept to look at the six countries we are studying.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
STRENGTHS
Characteristics and/or elements of the country that give it an advantage over others or things that the country does
well. (Internal)
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
WEAKNESSES
Characteristics and/or elements that place the country at a disadvantage
relative to others or that the country does NOT do well. (Internal)
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
OPPORTUNITIES
Elements that the country could exploit to its advantage or capitalize on in the global environment and marketplace.
(External)
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
THREATS
Elements in the global environment that could cause trouble for the
country. (External and out of the country’s
control.)
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
Group Project
Provide a very general and basic profile and SWOT analysis using a modified SWOT approach. The framework for both will be provided. Groups will use the information provided in class as well as research on done outside of class to form a hypothesis and project what they believe will be the country’s greatest challenge over the next 5 years. The issue will have to presented on a national scale and supported by
sound factual evidence and substantiated assertions. The issue can be related to the economy, national security, domestic issues, etc…
The group’s brief class presentation will be to present their assertions. The grading framework will be provided as well as it will
be focused more on a completion and “adherence to the instructions” basis.
AP Comparative Government
Mr. Searcy
Individual Project
Each student will provide their position, via essay, either supporting or refuting the five groups’ assertions and why. Students will have the
option to provide a comment or section on their position regarding their own group’s assertion. The overall goal is for the students to be able to formulate a group position and then formulate an individual position
based on what was presented to them.
As with the group presentations and assertions, the individual positions must be presented on a national scale and supported by
sound factual evidence and substantiated assertions.