Comparative bioavailability of curcumin, turmeric and Biocurcumax™ in traditional vehicles using...
Click here to load reader
Transcript of Comparative bioavailability of curcumin, turmeric and Biocurcumax™ in traditional vehicles using...
J O U R N A L O F F U N C T I O N A L F O O D S 2 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 6 0 – 6 5
. sc iencedi rec t .com
ava i lab le at wwwjournal homepage: www.elsevier .com/ locate / j f f
Comparative bioavailability of curcumin, turmericand Biocurcumax� in traditional vehiclesusing non-everted rat intestinal sac model
Shishu*, Manjul Maheshwari1
University Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160014, India
A R T I C L E I N F O
Article history:
Received 18 August 2009
Received in revised form
27 January 2010
Accepted 28 January 2010
Available online 21 February 2010
Keywords:
Curcumin
Permeability
Non-everted intestinal sac
Biocurcumax�Bioavailability
Solubility
1756-4646/$ - see front matter � 2010 Elsevidoi:10.1016/j.jff.2010.01.004
* Corresponding author: Tel.: +91 172 2534281E-mail addresses: [email protected]
wari).1 Tel.: +91 172 2534281 (O), +91 9872319234
A B S T R A C T
The bioavailability of curcumin from turmeric, Biocurcumax� and as plain curcumin was
investigated using conventional vehicles by a non-everted rat intestinal model. Results of
ex vivo intestinal permeability studies showed an enhancement in the permeability of cur-
cumin with increase in lipophilicity of the vehicle used. Maximum permeability of curcu-
min was obtained from corn oil (13.4%) followed by clarified butter (9.82%), milk (4.24%)
and aqueous suspension (1.66%) in 8 h. Another very interesting and important observation
was that the permeation of curcumin was more from turmeric and Biocurcumax� than
from plain curcumin. These studies strongly suggest that curcumin may be consumed as
turmeric/Biocurcumax� in lipophilic vehicles instead of plain curcumin for maximum ben-
eficial effects.
� 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The dried powdered rhizomes of Curcuma longa L. (Zingibera-
ceae), commonly known as turmeric, have extensively been
used for centuries as a spice, food preservative, and a yellow
colourant for food, drugs, and cosmetics (Nadkarni, 1976). Cur-
cumin (diferuloylmethane; 1,7-bis[4-hydroxy-3-methoxy-
phenyl]-1,6-heptadiene-3,5-dione) along with its mono- and
bisdemethoxy derivatives, collectively called curcuminoids,
constitute the major orange-yellow colouring matter and the
biologically active constituents of turmeric. Natural curcumin,
isolated from C. longa, contains curcumin I (diferuloylme-
thane, 94%), curcumin II (demethoxycurcumin, 6%), and cur-
cumin III (bisdemethoxycurcumin, 0.3%) and curcumin is
er Ltd. All rights reserved
(O), +91 172 2782099 (R)o.in, [email protected]
(M); fax: +91 172 2541142
responsible for most of the pharmacological actions of tur-
meric. A number of studies have highlighted antioxidant
(Jayaprakasha et al., 2006; Sandur et al., 2007), anti-inflamma-
tory (Aggarwal et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2008), anticancer
(Hatcher et al., 2008; Johnson & Mukhtar, 2007), nephroprotec-
tive (Cekmen et al., 2009), hypolipidemic (Manjunatha &
Srinivasan, 2007), hepatoprotective (Naik et al., 2004) and
immunomodulatory (Gao et al., 2004) properties of curcumin.
Curcumin has also been reported to combat various types of
rheumatoid arthritis and Alzheimer’s disease (Ringman
et al., 2005). Curcumin modulates various molecular targets,
including transcription factors, cytokines, cell cycle proteins
and a multitude of enzymes (COX-II), receptors and cell sur-
face adhesion molecules (Shishodia et al., 2005). In traditional
.
; fax: +91 172 2541142..in (Shishu), [email protected] (M. Mahesh-
.
J O U R N A L O F F U N C T I O N A L F O O D S 2 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 6 0 – 6 5 61
system of medicine, turmeric has been used as an antiseptic, a
cure for poisoning, for treating dyspepsia and respiratory dis-
orders, to eliminate body wastes, wound healing and as a cure
for some skin diseases, and as a household remedy for treat-
ing sprains and swellings caused by injury (Ammon & Wahl,
1991). Many animal and clinical studies have proven that it
is a non-toxic and highly safe compound with a wide range
of pharmacological properties and doses as high as 8–10 g
per day have been shown to be well tolerated in humans
(Lao et al., 2006). However, clinical application of curcumin is
limited because of its poor bioavailability (Yang et al., 2007)
due to its poor solubility in water and poor absorption. Poor
absorption from the gut and avid metabolism in the body are
cited as the reasons for the lack of systemic availability. While
the major portion of ingested curcumin is excreted unmetab-
olized through the faeces, a small portion that is absorbed is
extensively converted to its water-soluble metabolites, glucu-
ronides and sulphate, and excreted. This seriously limits cur-
cumin to reach targets distant from the gut and exert its
beneficial action (Christopher et al., 2002). Preclinical and clin-
ical pilot studies with this dietary phytochemical suggest that
concentrations of curcumin achieved in plasma and target tis-
sues are very low (Anand et al., 2007; Sharma et al., 2007).
Biocurcumax� is a synergistic product of sesquiterpenoids
(volatile oils) and the curcuminoids present in turmeric re-
cently developed and patented by Arjuna Natural Extracts
Ltd. (Patent No. 200430), Edayar, India (Antony et al., 2005). It
is a reconstituted turmeric extract standardized with not less
than 95% curcuminoids (‘‘curcuminoid’’ is a mixture of curcu-
min, demethoxycurcumin and bisdidemethoxycurcumin,
wherein curcumin is the major component of the curcumi-
noid and comprises about 95% of the curcuminoid, and,
demethoxycurcumin and bisdidemethoxycurcumin are min-
or components of the curcuminoid). It has been reported to
be more bioavailable than curcumin (Antony, 2006). Similarly,
there are numerous other reports on attempts to enhance the
bioavailability of this promising bioactive phytoconstituent.
Some recent investigations suggest the use of piperine as an
adjuvant (Bhutani et al., 2009), liposomal curcumin (Li et al.,
2005), curcumin nanoparticles (Shaikh et al., 2009), gastrore-
tentive tablets (Shishu et al., 2008), curcumin phospholipid
complex (Liu et al., 2006), self-microemulsifying drug delivery
system (Cui et al., 2009) and solid lipid microparticles (Yadav
et al., 2009) for enhancing the bioavailability of curcumin.
In the traditional Indian system of medicine turmeric pow-
der is administered orally as a dispersion in milk or in a mix-
ture of clarified butter and milk. As a dietary component it is
generally consumed as curry ingredient where it is dispersed/
dissolved in cooking media like oils or clarified butter. The
aim of the present investigation was to explore and compare
the bioavailability of curcumin from turmeric (natural dietary
form), Biocurcumax� (a patented product with enhanced bio-
availability) and as plain curcumin and also to check the bio-
availability of curcumin from different conventional vehicles
such as milk, clarified butter and corn oil using non-everted
rat intestinal model. The permeability of drug candidates
across the intestinal mucosa is one of the most important fac-
tors in defining their bioavailability and biological activity.
Non-everted intestinal rat sac method is an excellent tech-
nique that may be employed to predict in vivo human absorp-
tion and bioavailability of promising natural compounds with
poor water solubility, poor permeability and/or poor stability
(Ruan et al., 2006). Therefore, this technique was used to as-
sess the bioavailability of curcumin.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Materials
Curcumin and BCM-95� CG (Biocurcumax�: 95% curcumi-
noids) were obtained as gift from Arjuna Natural Extracts
Ltd., Edayar, India. Turmeric powder (MDH-Haldi powder,
Lot number: DLHP/91-NR/10/GS/08-L; curcumin content
3.4%), desi ghee/clarified butter (Verka� ghee) and corn oil
(Saffola� refined oil) were purchased from a local market in
Chandigarh, India. All other reagents and chemicals used
were of analytical reagent grade.
2.2. Analytical technique
The samples were analyzed using a UV–visible double beam
spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The methodol-
ogy and data were validated for linearity, accuracy and preci-
sion in the drug concentration range of 1–10 lg/ml. The
equation for linearity was observed to be y = 1.113E � 01x with
r2 = 0.9999 and E1%1cm = 1113 at kmax 422 nm.
2.3. Solubility studies
The solubility of curcumin and Biocurcumax� was deter-
mined in water, desi ghee (clarified butter) and corn oil. An
excess amount of curcumin was added to 2 ml of each se-
lected vehicle and was kept at 37 ± 1 �C in a thermostated
shaking water bath (Narang Scientific Works, New Delhi, In-
dia) for 48 h. Then contents were then filtered through
0.22 lm filter and the filtrate was analyzed spectrophotomet-
rically at kmax 422 nm after appropriate dilution with
methanol.
2.4. Ex vivo intestinal permeation studies
Ex vivo permeation studies of curcumin, turmeric and Bio-
curcumax� from different vehicles were carried out using
non-everted gut sac technique. A total number of 20 male
Wistar rats (weighing 200–250 g) were used for the complete
study. Animals were sacrificed by spinal dislocation after
overnight fasting. The small intestine was removed by cutting
across the upper end of the duodenum and the lower end of
the ileum and manually stripping the mesentery. The small
intestine was washed out carefully with cold normal oxygen-
ated saline solution (0.9%, w/v, NaCl) using a syringe equipped
with blunt end. The clean intestinal tract was prepared into
8 ± 0.2 cm long sacs having a diameter of 3.0 ± 0.5 mm. Each
sac was filled with 0.5 ml of curcumin formulation (equivalent
to 0.5 mg of curcumin) via a blunt needle, and the two sides of
the intestine were tied tightly with thread. Each non-everted
intestinal sac was placed in a glass conical flask containing
50 ml of a mixture of Krebs Ringer phosphate buffer saline
pH 7.4 [containing sodium chloride (0.67%, w/v), potassium
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 2 4 6 8 10Time (h)
Am
ount
per
mea
ted/
area
(µ
g/cm
2 ) in
8h
Aq. Susp. Milk Clarified Butter Corn oil
Fig. 1 – Plot of cumulative amount of curcumin permeated
per unit area vs time in different vehicles.
62 J O U R N A L O F F U N C T I O N A L F O O D S 2 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 6 0 – 6 5
chloride (0.034%, w/v), magnesium sulphate (0.059%, w/v),
calcium chloride (0.011%, w/v), sodium dihydrogen phosphate
(0.234%, w/v) and glucose (0.18%, w/v) in distilled water] and
isopropyl alcohol in the ratio of 7:3 (v/v). The entire system
was maintained at 37 �C in a shaking water bath operating
at 50 rpm and aerated with oxygen (10–15 bubble/min) using
laboratory aerator. From outside of the sac 2 ml samples were
withdrawn every 30 min for 8 h and replaced with fresh 2 ml
of medium. The samples were analyzed at kmax 422 nm using
a UV–visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).
The cumulative amount released per unit area of sac (lg/
cm2), flux (lg/cm2/h) and percent drug permeation in the
receptor compartment were calculated (Ruan et al., 2006).
Studies were performed in four replicates and all data were
statistically analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANO-
VA) followed by Dunnett’s test and P value <0.05 was consid-
ered significant.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Solubility studies
Solubility of a bioactive compound is an important physical
parameter that affects its absorption and bioavailability.
Therefore, the solubility of curcumin was determined in dif-
ferent vehicles used traditionally for administration (Table 1).
In corn oil the solubility curcumin was found to be highest
(0.426 ± 0.009 mg/ml) followed by clarified butter
(0.330 ± 0.007 mg/ml) and water (0.00564 ± 0.0006 mg/ml). Cur-
cumin from Biocurcumax� showed similar solubility behav-
iour in corn oil (0.458 ± 0.008 mg/ml) and in clarified butter
(0.351 ± 0.010 mg/ml). However, the aqueous solubility of cur-
cumin from Biocurcumax� (0.027 ± 0.001 mg/ml) was found
to be significantly higher (5.4 times) than solubility of plain
curcumin in water (P < 0.05). Greater solubility of curcumin
in Biocurcumax� may be due to the presence of some other
chemical constituents in this bioavailability enhanced
preparation.
3.2. Influence of vehicles on ex vivo permeation of plaincurcumin
Fig. 1 depicts the ex vivo permeation profiles of curcumin from
different vehicles using non-everted rodent gut sac tech-
nique. From aqueous suspension curcumin showed low per-
meation, i.e., only 1.513 ± 0.214 lg/cm2 (1.66%) in 8 h which
may be due to poor solubility of curcumin in water. Whereas,
an increase in permeability of curcumin was observed, when
it was incorporated into lipophilic vehicles employed tradi-
tionally for administration. The amount of curcumin released
Table 1 – Solubility profile of curcumin andBiocurcumaxTM.
Vehicle Solubility ofcurcumin (mg/ml)
Solubility ofBiocurcumax� (mg/ml)
Water 0.005 ± 0.0006 0.027 ± 0.001
Clarified butter 0.330 ± 0.007 0.351 ± 0.010
Corn oil 0.426 ± 0.009 0.458 ± 0.008
per unit area from milk, corn oil and clarified butter was
found to be 3.86 ± 0.428 (4.24%), 8.93 ± 0.642 (9.82%) and
12.18 ± 0.428 lg/cm2 (13.40%) in 8 h, respectively, which was
significantly different and higher than that from the aqueous
suspension at P < 0.05. The rate of permeation (flux) of curcu-
min from aqueous suspension, milk, clarified butter and corn
oil was observed to be 0.129 ± 0.045, 0.908 ± 0.107,
1.804 ± 0.0275 and 3.033 ± 0.099 lg/cm2/h, respectively
(Fig. 5). More than 23-fold increase in flux from corn oil 14-
fold increase from clarified butter and 7-fold increase in flux
were achieved from milk when values were compared with
flux values from aqueous suspension. Such a high degree of
enhancement in the permeability of curcumin from the lipo-
philic vehicles may be attributed to the greater solubility of
curcumin in these vehicles and subsequent favourable
partitioning.
3.3. Influence of vehicles on ex vivo permeation ofcurcumin from turmeric
Like plain curcumin the amount of curcumin permeated per
unit area from turmeric (Fig. 2) using lipophilic vehicles like
milk, corn oil and clarified butter (5.14 ± 0.454 lg/cm2; 5.32%,
13.1 ± 0.681 lg/cm2; 13.57% and 19.2 ± 0.909 lg/cm2; 19.9% in
8 h, respectively) was found to be significantly greater than
that from aqueous suspension (1.76 ± 0.227 lg/cm2; 1.83%).
Similarly, the order of rate of permeation of curcumin from
turmeric was as follows: aqueous suspension
(0.183 ± 0.016 lg/cm2/h) < milk (1.062 ± 0.173 lg/cm2/h) < clari-
fied butter (3.134 ± 0.025 lg/cm2/h) < corn oil (5.079 ± 0.221 lg/
cm2/h). More than 27-fold increase in flux from corn oil, 17-
fold increase in flux from clarified butter and 6-fold increase
in flux was achieved from milk when compared with aqueous
suspension of turmeric (Fig. 5). Turmeric is reported to con-
tain volatile oils (sesquiterpene ketones or tumerons, includ-
ing a-tumerone, b-tumerone, artumerone, a-atlantone,
curlone, zinziberene, curcumol); curcuminoids (curcumin,
demethoxycurcumin, bisdemethoxycurcumin); 1,5-diaryl-
penta-1,4-dien-3-on-derivatives; and sugars (Uehara et al.,
1992). Higher permeation of curcumin from turmeric as com-
pared to plain curcumin may be due permeation enhancing
effects of volatile components present in the turmeric.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 2 4 6 8 10Time (h)
Am
ount
per
mea
ted/
area
(µ
g/cm
2 ) in
8h
Aq. Susp Milk Clarified Butter Corn oil
Fig. 2 – Plot of cumulative amount of curcumin permeated
per unit area vs time from turmeric using different vehicles.
J O U R N A L O F F U N C T I O N A L F O O D S 2 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 6 0 – 6 5 63
3.4. Influence of vehicles on ex vivo permeation ofcurcumin from Biocurcumax�
Biocurcumax�, a patented product of Arjuna Naturals is a
reconstituted, purified and standardized turmeric extract with
enhanced bioavailability (Antony, 2006). Results of ex vivo per-
meation studies of curcumin from Biocurcumax� using rat
intestinal sac are shown in Fig. 3. Like plain curcumin and tur-
meric the cumulative amount of curcumin permeated per unit
area from Biocurcumax� using corn oil was the highest
(20.94 ± 0.375 lg/cm2; 26.3%) followed by clarified butter
(13.52 ± 0.468 lg/cm2; 16.98%), milk (5.43 ± 0.468 lg/cm2;
6.82%) and aqueous suspension (2.05 ± 0.187 lg/cm2; 2.58%).
Similarly the order of rate of permeation of curcumin from
Biocurcumax� (Fig. 5) was corn oil (4.303 ± 0.0155 lg/cm2/
h) > clarified butter (2.47 ± 0.030 lg/cm2/h) > milk (0.977 ±
0.079 lg/cm2/h) > aqueous suspension (0.147 ± 0.033 lg/cm2/
h). Biocurcumax� contains a blend of the sesquiterpenoids
and the curcuminoids present in turmeric (Antony et al.,
2005). Like turmeric higher permeation values as compared
to plain curcumin may be due to the presence of the sesquit-
erpenoids/volatile oils that might have influenced the perme-
ability of curcumin through intestinal membrane.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 2 4 6 8 10Time (h)
Am
ount
per
mea
ted/
area
(µg
/cm
2 ) in
8h
Aq. Susp Milk Clarified Butter Corn oil
Fig. 3 – Plot of cumulative amount of curcumin permeated
per unit area vs time from Biocurcumax� using different
vehicles.
3.5. Comparison of bioavailability of curcumin fromturmeric, Biocurcumax� and as plain curcumin
The bioavailability of curcumin as plain curcumin, from tur-
meric and Biocurcumax� was assessed using a non-everted
rat intestinal sac model. It was observed that from all the four
different vehicles used in the study plain curcumin showed
the least permeation. Almost 1.2–1.7 times enhancement in
permeation was obtained from turmeric and Biocurcumax�(Figs. 4 and 5). There was a statistically significant difference
in cumulative amount permeated per unit area in 8 h between
Biocurcumax� and plain curcumin, and turmeric and plain
curcumin when the permeation studies were carried out using
clarified butter and corn oil at P < 0.05. This difference in per-
meation profile may be due to the presence of volatile oils (ses-
quiterpenoids) in both turmeric and Biocurcumax� which
might be responsible for the enhanced permeation of curcu-
min through intestinal membrane. Results also indicate that
turmeric and Biocurcumax� showed equivalent performance
in the lipophilic vehicles and there was no statistically signif-
icant difference at P < 0.05. From aqueous suspension, the
cumulative amount released per unit area from plain curcu-
min, turmeric and Biocurcumax� was 1.51 ± 0.107,
1.76 ± 0.227 and 2.05 ± 0.187 lg/cm2 in 8 h, respectively, was
negligible because of poor water solubility characteristics of
curcumin. Slightly higher permeation of curcumin from Bio-
curcumax� aqueous suspension in comparison to plain cur-
cumin may be due to greater water solubility of curcumin
present in Biocurcumax� (Table 1). On comparison of flux data
of plain curcumin with turmeric and Biocurcumax� from dif-
ferent vehicles, it was observed that significantly higher val-
ues were obtained in case of permeation studies carried out
using clarified butter and corn oil at P < 0.05 and values were
not statistically significantly different in case of aqueous sus-
pension and milk. Although there was no statistically signifi-
cant difference between turmeric and Biocurcumax� in total
amount of permeated per unit area in 8 h using clarified butter
and corn oil at P < 0.05, significantly higher values of rate of
permeation (flux) were found in turmeric when comparison
was done with Biocurcumax�, suggesting that in the natural
form turmeric, there were some other constituents such as
sugars in addition to volatile oils which were influencing the
solubility and permeation behaviour of curcumin.
0
5
10
15
20
25
Am
ount
per
mea
ted/
area
(µg
/cm
2 ) in
8
h
Aq. Susp Milk Clarified butter Corn oil
Curcumin Turmeric Biocurcumax
Fig. 4 – Comparison of cumulative amount of curcumin
permeated per unit area from turmeric, Biocurcumax� and
as plain curcumin using different vehicles.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Flu
x (µ
g/cm
2 /h)
Aq. Susp Milk Clarified butter Corn oil
Curcumin Turmeric Biocurcumax
Fig. 5 – Comparison of flux of curcumin from turmeric,
Biocurcumax� and as plain curcumin using different
vehicles.
64 J O U R N A L O F F U N C T I O N A L F O O D S 2 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 6 0 – 6 5
4. Conclusions
Curcumin, a polyphenol from dietary spice turmeric is cur-
rently one of the most actively and extensively investigated
natural compound for its broad spectrum of pharmacological
activities. However, the fact that it is poorly absorbed after oral
administration limits full exploitation of this potential candi-
date against a wide spectrum of therapeutic powers it pos-
sesses to treat various ailments. Turmeric is extensively
used in traditional Indian system of medicine and as a home
remedy for various diseases. Therefore, in the present investi-
gations the solubility behaviour in different traditional vehi-
cles like milk, clarified butter and corn oil which are usually
used for administration of turmeric was studied. Curcumin
being lipophilic showed higher solubility in these traditional
vehicles and hence showed greater permeation through intes-
tinal membrane. Further, it was also observed that permeation
of curcumin from Biocurcumax� and turmeric containing vol-
atile sesquiterpenoids was substantially higher than plain cur-
cumin. Although these are only preliminary investigations
using ex vivo rat intestinal sac model, these studies do suggest
that by using traditional lipophilic vehicles and using the nat-
ural dietary form, i.e., turmeric and Biocurcumax� instead of
plain curcumin, higher absorption and greater therapeutic
levels of this highly promising molecule can be achieved.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance
from the University Grants Commission, India. The authors
are also thankful to Arjuna naturals, Kerala for providing
the gift sample of curcumin and Biocurcumax�.
R E F E R E N C E S
Aggarwal, B. B., Shishodia, S., Sandur, S. K., Pandey, M. K., & Sethi,G. (2006). Inflammation and cancer: How hot is the link?Biochemical Pharmacology, 72, 1605–1621.
Ammon, H. P. T., & Wahl, M. A. (1991). Pharmacology of Curcumalonga. Planta Medica, 57, 1–7.
Anand, P., Kunnumakkara, A. B., Newman, R. A., & Aggarwal, B. B.(2007). Bioavailability of curcumin: Problems and promises.Molecular Pharmacology, 4, 807–818.
Antony, B. (2006). A composition to enhance the bioavailability ofcurcumin, WO2006129323, Arjuna Natural Extracts Ltd.
Antony, B., Benny, M., & Rao, S. B. (2005). Enhancing theabsorption of curcuminoids. Spice India, 23, 26.
Bhutani, M., Bishnoi, M., & Kulkarni, S. K. (2009). Anti-depressantlike effect of curcumin and its combination with piperine inunpredictable chronic stress-induced behavioral, biochemicaland neurochemical changes. Pharmacology Biochemistry andBehavior, 92(1), 39–43.
Cekmen, M., llbey, Y. O., Ozbek, E., Simsek, A., Somay, A., & Ersoz,C. (2009). Curcumin prevents oxidative renal damage inducedby acetaminophen in rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 47(7),1480–1484.
Chen, D., Nie, M., Fan, M., & Bian, Z. (2008). Anti-inflammatoryactivity of curcumin in macrophages stimulated bylipopolysaccharides from Porphyromonas gingivalis.Pharmacology, 82, 264–269.
Christopher, R. I., Donald, J. L., Samantha, O., Coughtrie, M. W. H.,Boocock, D. J., Williams, M. L., Farmer, P. B., Steward, W. P., &Gescher, A. J. (2002). Metabolism of the cancerchemopreventive agent curcumin in human and rat intestine.Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 11, 105–111.
Cui, J., Yu, B., Zhao, Y., Zhu, W., Li, H., Lou, H., & Zhai, G. (2009).Enhancement of oral absorption of curcumin by self-microemulsifying drug delivery systems. International Journal ofPharmaceutics, 371, 148–155.
Gao, X. H., Kuo, J., Jiang, H., Deeb, D., Liu, Y. B., Divine, G.,Chapman, R. A., Dulchavsky, S. A., & Gautam, S. C. (2004).Immunomodulatory activity of curcumin: Suppression oflymphocyte proliferation, development of cell-mediatedcytotoxicity, and cytokine production in vitro. BiochemicalPharmacology, 68(1), 51–61.
Hatcher, H., Planalp, R., Cho, J., Torti, F. M., & Torti, S. V. (2008).Curcumin: From ancient medicine to current clinical trials.Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 65(11), 1631–1652.
Jayaprakasha, G. K., Jaganmohan Rao, L., & Sakariah, K. K. (2006).Antioxidant activities of curcumin, demethoxycurcumin andbisdemethoxycurcumin. Food Chemistry, 98, 720–724.
Johnson, J. J., & Mukhtar, H. (2007). Curcumin forchemoprevention of colon cancer. Cancer Letter, 255, 170–181.
Lao, C. D., Ruffin, M. T., Normolle, D., Heath, D. D., Murray, S. I.,Baily, J. M., Boggs, M. E., Crowell, J., Rock, C. L., & Brenner, D. E.(2006). Dose escalation of a curcuminoid formulation. BMCComplementary and Alternative Medicine, 6, 10–13.
Li, L., Braiteh, F. S., & Kurzrock, R. (2005). Liposome-encapsulatedcurcumin: In vitro and in vivo effects on proliferation,apoptosis, signaling, and angiogenesis. Cancer, 104(6),1322–1331.
Liu, A., Lou, H., Zhao, L., & Fan, P. (2006). Validated LC/MS/MSassay for curcumin and tetrahydrocurcumin in rat plasma andapplication to pharmacokinetic study of phospholipidcomplex of curcumin. Journal Pharmaceutical BiomedicalAnalysis, 40(3), 720–727.
Manjunatha, H., & Srinivasan, K. (2007). Hypolipidemic andantioxidant effects of dietary curcumin and capsaicin ininduced hypercholesterolemic rats. Lipids, 42(12), 1133–1142.
Nadkarni, K. M. (1976). Curcuma longa. In K. M. Nadkarni (Ed.), Indiamateria medica (pp. 414–416). Bombay, India: Popular PrakashanPublishing Company.
Naik, R. S., Mujumdar, A. M., & Ghaskadbi, S. (2004). Protection ofliver cells from ethanol cytotoxicity by curcumin in liver sliceculture in vitro. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 95(1), 31–37.
Ringman, J. M., Frautschy, S. A., Cole, G. M., Masterman, D. L., &Cummings, J. L. (2005). A potential role of the curry spice
J O U R N A L O F F U N C T I O N A L F O O D S 2 ( 2 0 1 0 ) 6 0 – 6 5 65
curcumin in Alzheimer’s disease. Current Alzheimer Research, 2,131–136.
Ruan, L. P., Chen, S., Yu, B. Y., Zhu, D. N., Cordell, G. A., & Qiu, S. X.(2006). Prediction of human absorption of natural compoundsby the non-everted rat intestinal sac model. European Journal ofMedicinal Chemistry, 41, 605–610.
Sandur, S. K., Pandey, M. K., Sung, B., Ahn, K. S., Murakami, A., &Sethi, G. (2007). Curcumin, demethoxycurcumin,bisdemethoxycurcumin, tetrahydrocurcumin and turmeronesdifferentially regulate anti-inflammatory and antiproliferativeresponses through a ROS-independent mechanism.Carcinogenesis, 28, 1765–1773.
Shaikh, J., Ankola, D. D., Beniwal, V., Singh, D., & Kumar, M. N.(2009). Nanoparticle encapsulation improves oralbioavailability of curcumin by at least 9-fold when comparedto curcumin administered with piperine as absorptionenhancer. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 37(3–4),223–230.
Sharma, R. A., Steward, W. P., & Gescher, A. J. (2007).Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of curcumin.Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 595, 453–470.
Shishodia, S., Sethi, G., & Aggarwal, B. B. (2005). Curcumin:Getting back to the roots. NY Academic Science, 1056,206–217.
Shishu, Goindi, Gupta, N., & Aggarwal, N. (2008). Bioavailabilityenhancement and targeting of stomach tumors using gastro-retentive floating drug delivery system of curcumin—‘‘Atechnical note’’. American Association of Pharmaceutical ScientistsPharmSciTech, 9(3), 810–813.
Uehara, S. I., Yasuda, I., Takeya, K., & Itokawa, H. (1992).Comparison of the commercial turmeric and its cultivatedplant by their constituents. Shoyakugaku Zasshi, 46, 55–61.
Yadav, V., Devi, K., Yadav, S., & Sarasija, S. (2009). Novelformulation of solid lipid microparticles of curcumin for anti-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory activity for optimization oftherapy of inflammatory bowel disease. Journal of Pharmacy andPharmacology, 61(3), 311–321.
Yang, K. Y., Lin, L. C., Tseng, T. Y., Wang, S. C., & Tsai, T. H. (2007).Oral bioavailability of curcumin in rat and the herbal analysisfrom Curcuma longa by LC–MS/MS. Journal of Chromatography B.Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences, 853,183–189.