Comparative Advantage

28
Comparative Advantage Wk 2

description

Comparative Advantage. Wk 2. Ari and Sam must write a class report with charts. In one hour… Ari can write 300 words or make 3 charts. Sam can write 200 words or make 1 chart. Who should do each task?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Comparative Advantage

Page 1: Comparative Advantage

Comparative

AdvantageWk 2

Page 2: Comparative Advantage

Ari and Sam must write a

class report with charts.In one hour… Ari can write 300 words

or make 3 charts.Sam can write 200 wordsor make 1 chart.Who should do each task?

Page 3: Comparative Advantage

Exer

cise

If person A can do either of

two tasks in less time than

person B, person A will have an “absolute advantage” in both tasks.

It is likely, however, that person A will have a comparative advantage in

only one task. Who should undertake each task depends on comparative advantage, not on absolute advantage.

Page 4: Comparative Advantage

Abso

lute

Ad

vant

age

A person has an absolute advantage over another in the production of the good if she can produce more of that good than the other person (in a fixed amount of time)

Page 5: Comparative Advantage

Com

para

tive

Adva

ntag

e

Person A has a comparative advantage over Person B if Person A’s opportunity cost of

performing a task is lower than Person B’s opportunity cost of performing the same task.

Page 6: Comparative Advantage

To the extent possible, Sam

shouldwrite and Ari should make

charts.Sam has a lower opportunity

cost for writing.Sam has a comparative advantage in writing.

Ari has a lower opportunity

cost in chartmaking.Ari has a comparative advantage in chartmaking.

Page 7: Comparative Advantage

Ari has an absolute advantage in chart making and word craft.

Page 8: Comparative Advantage

Exer

cise

Ari and Sam must write aclass report with charts.

In one hour… Ari can write 300 words or make 3

charts.Sam can write 200 wordsor make 1 chart.

Suppose the report must include 600

words andtwo charts and that both must

contribute.How much time will it take if…

a) Sam writes and Ari makes chart

b) Ari writes and Sam makes charts

Page 9: Comparative Advantage

The

Prin

ciple

of

Com

para

tive

Adva

ntag

e Everyone does best when each person (or each country) concentrates on the

activities for which his or her opportunity cost is the lowest.

Page 10: Comparative Advantage

In one eight hour work day,

Sam can wax 4 cars or wash 12

cars.Ari can wax 3 cars or wash 6

cars.Which of the following is true?

Sam’s cost of washing one car is

…A.Greater than Ari’s Cost of

washing a car.B.One third of a waxed car.C.Three waxed cars.D.One half of a waxed car

Page 11: Comparative Advantage

Many corporations willingly provide their CEOs with a personal assistant who accomplishes both

business and personal tasks for the CEO. Why do corporations provide personal assistants? Should the shareholders complain?

Page 12: Comparative Advantage

Many corporations provide their CEOs

with a personal assistant who

accomplishes both business and

personal tasks. Which of the following

is closest to your view? Shareholders

should…A. Oppose the practice because it

lowers firm profits and shareholder

dividends.B. Oppose the practice but acknowledge that CEOs expect to

have a personal assistant.

C. Approve the practice because it

amounts to tax free compensation

for the CEO.D. Approve the practice because it frees

the CEO to perform more important

tasks.

Page 13: Comparative Advantage

Prod

uctio

n Po

ssib

ilitie

s

. The production possibilities graph describes the maximum amount of one good that can be produced for every

possible level of production of the other good. The PPF shows that

resource scarcity implies that production of any good entails an opportunity cost.

Page 14: Comparative Advantage

Ari’s Production

Possibilities Curve

In 8 hours Ari can write 2400

words or make 24 charts.

Page 15: Comparative Advantage

Sam’s Production

Possibilities Curve

Sam can write 1600

words or make 8 charts.

Page 16: Comparative Advantage
Page 17: Comparative Advantage

Join

t Pos

sibilit

ies

Curv

e

Page 18: Comparative Advantage

Law of Increasing CostAlso called “The- Low- Hanging Fruit- Principle”

Page 19: Comparative Advantage

Law

of

incr

easin

g co

sts In expanding the

production of any good, first employ those resources with the lowest opportunity cost, and only afterward turn to

resources with higher opportunity costs.

Page 20: Comparative Advantage

Exercise Four survivors

are stuck on an

island. Each

can either fish

or gather

berries. The

following table

shows what

each survivor

can produce in

a day.

Which survivor

should be the

first assigned

to pick berries?

Page 21: Comparative Advantage

Suppose at their evening meeting,

the survivors decide to make a stew

using 6 pounds of fish. They would

want, in addition, as many berries

as possible. Draw a graph showing the survivors

production possibilities for fish and

berries How should work be assigned the

next day? Who should fish and who

should gather? Why? Given their work assignments, what

is the group’s opportunity cost for

fish? Explain. Why does the cost of fish increase

as the survivors decide to produce

more fish?

Page 22: Comparative Advantage
Page 23: Comparative Advantage

The Production

Possibilities Curve.Inside the PPF Resources are

Under Employed

Page 24: Comparative Advantage

Outside the PPF is not possible

Page 25: Comparative Advantage

To BenefitFromSpecializationPeopleMust Trade.

Page 26: Comparative Advantage

Com

para

tive

Adva

ntag

e an

d Tr

ade

Both Kansas and California can

produce beef cattle and grapes.

Assume the value of labor and other

needed inputs is the same per acre

in each state and for each product.

In Kansas an acre of land can be

used to produce 300 pounds of

beef or 100 pounds of grapes

In California, and acre of land can

be used to produce 150 pounds

of beef or 200 pounds of grapes.

What are the opportunity costs of

producing beef and grapes for

Kansas and for California. Who

should produce what?

Page 27: Comparative Advantage

The cost of producing a lb. of

grapes in Kansas is 3lbs. of

beef. Kansas will be better off specializing in beef, if it can

buy grapes for less than 3 lbs.

of beef. The cost of producing a lb. of

grapes in California is ¾ lbs.

of beef. California will be better off

specializing in grapes if it can

sell grapes for more than ¾

lbs. of beef.

Page 28: Comparative Advantage

The

End

Homework: Problems 1, 5,6,7,8,9 , MC on EDU