COMPANY LAW: Ownership & Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

32
COMPANY LAW: OWNERSHIP & MANAGEMENT PART 2 - MEMBERS Saturday 11 th August 2012 Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

description

Saturday 11 th August 2012. COMPANY LAW: Ownership & Management Part 2 - MEMBERS. Person who has agreed to be a member and whose name has been entered in Register of Members Subscribers to Memorandum deemed to have agreed to become members of company Other means: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of COMPANY LAW: Ownership & Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

Page 1: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

COMPANY LAW:OWNERSHIP

& MANAGEMENT

PART 2 - MEMBERS

Saturday 11th August 2012

Page 2: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

MEMBERS OF A COMPANY Person who has agreed to be a member and whose

name has been entered in Register of Members

Subscribers to Memorandum deemed to have agreed to become members of company

Other means:-Applying and being allotted shares-Presenting to company for registration a transfer of shares to them-Applying as personal representative/trustee of deceased or bankrupt member

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 3: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

RIGHTS OF MEMBERS- To be sent copy of annual accounts & reports

- To require directors to call general meeting

- To appoint a proxy to attend & vote at meetings in their place

- To nominate someone to enjoy information rights (only for members of listed companies who hold shares on behalf of someone else)

- To enforce personal rights provided by virtue of their shares

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 4: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

APPROVAL OF DIRECTORS ACTIONS Certain actions with regards to directors require approval of members in general meetings:

-Approval of director’s service contract (if guaranteed term of 2 years or more)

- Substantial property transactions

- Loans to directors

- Payments or benefits for loss of office or retirement

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 5: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

MAJORITY RULE It is the members who truly control the company; i.e. through special resolutions

Minority does not have recourse against majority

The rule in Foss v Harbottle (1843):

-The company is a separate person from its members and thus only the company can protect its rights in an action

- The company decide whether to bring legal proceedings through general meeting

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 6: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

MINORITY PROTECTION Minority can bring an action to court if:

-Statute provides for a specific power to the minority

- Derivative action for negligence, breach of duty, default or breach of trust by the directors (under s 260)

- Derivative action in respect of unfairly prejudicial conduct by the majority (under s 994)

- Petition to wind up the company on grounds that it is just and equitable to do so

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 7: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

MINORITY PROTECTION Statutory rights of minorities:

-In situations where class rights have been varied, a dissenting minority can apply to the court to have the variation cancelled as ‘unfairly prejudicial.

- Can requisition company meeting

- Must be provided notice of members’ resolutions

- Apply to court to prevent payment out of capital for purchase of its own shares (by private company)

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 8: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

DERIVATIVE ACTION – NEGLIGENCE/BREACH OF DUTY

Claim by member on behalf of company in respect of an actual or proposed act or omission by a director

Must involve negligence or breach of duty (or breach of trust)

Permission of the court must be obtained for the case to be allowed

Permission refused if:-Continuing case would go against duty to promote success of company-Act or omission has been authorised by company beforehand or ratified subsequentlyLecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 9: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

PERMISSION FROM THE COURT Factors taken into consideration by the court:

-Member must be acting in good faith

- Action must not be against duty to promote the success of the company

- Whether there is possibility company would authorise or ratify the act or omission

- If company has decided or not to pursue the claim

- If member can pursue claim in his own right instead

- View of members with no personal interest in the matterLecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 10: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

DERIVATIVE ACTION – UNFAIRLY PREJUDICIAL CONDUCT

Action by member or Secretary of State on grounds that company’s affairs are being conducted in a manner which is unfairly prejudicial to the interests of members generally (or some part of member’s interests

The effect of the conduct is considered; i.e. its aftermath

- Exclusion & removal from board (if director had legitimate expectation to be involved in management)- Improper allotment of shares-Making inaccurate statement to shareholders-Diversion of company’s business to director-controlled company Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 11: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

UNFAIRLY PREJUDICIAL CONDUCT Courts will normally not intervene in cases of dispute about management, unless in extreme circumstances

Courts will also consider the petitioner’s conduct (remember this is an equitable remedy being claimed, thus has to abide by principles of equity)

Remedies that can be awarded by the court include:

-Regulating future conduct of company’s affairs-Authorising legal proceedings on behalf of company-Requiring company to do an act or refrain from doing an act- Purchase of shares of minority by other members- Requiring company to make alterations to articles or prevent any alteration without leave of the court

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 12: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

JUST AND EQUITABLE GROUND

Member dissatisfied with directors or controlling shareholders over the management of the company may petition the court for company to be wound up on the just and equitable ground

Member must show that no other remedy is available

Not enough for member to be dissatisfied to make it just and equitable since winding up a healthy company is a drastic step

Page 13: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

JUST AND EQUITABLE – EXAMPLES

The only or main object(s) of company cannot be or can no longer be achieved-Re German Date Coffee Co (1882): Objects clause specified coffee only manufactured under a German patent. Patent not granted, member petitioned for compulsory winding up and court held company existed only to ‘work under a particular patent’ and as it could no do so, it should be wound up

Company formed for an illegal or fraudulent purpose or there is complete deadlock in management of its affairs

Page 14: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

JUST AND EQUITABLE – EXAMPLES

-Re Yenidje Tobacco Co Ltd (1916): The only two directors quarrelled bitterly, one sued another for fraud, refused to speak to each other and conducted meetings through notes passed through secretary. Court held it was just and equitable to order liquidation

Directors deliberately withheld information; loss in confidence from shareholders

It is just and equitable to wind up the company in the absence of any other remedy

Page 15: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

MEETINGS Management of company in hands of directors, but decisions which affect existence of company, its structure and scope are reserved to members in general meetings

Decision of GM only valid and binding if meeting properly convened by notice and if business of meeting is fairly and properly conducted

Meetings allow members to exercise control (to a limited extent) over directors:-can remove directors by ordinary resolution (s168)-Need to approve items such as exceeding delegated power, allotting shares, granting long-service agreements, appointment/removal of auditors

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 16: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AGM is a statutorily protected way for members to have regular assessment and discussion of their company and its management

Private companies not required to hold AGM each year and thus, their business is usually conducted through written resolutions-However members holding sufficient shares or votes can request a general meeting or written resolution

Business of AGM includes:-Considering accounts, receiving directors’ report/remuneration report and auditors’ report-Dividends-Electing directors and appointing auditors

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 17: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING Public companies must hold AGM within 6 months of their year end and not more than 15 months may elapse between meetings (s336)

Notice of the meeting (s337):-Must be in writing and in accordance with articles-May be in hard or electronic form or by website (s308)-At least 21 days notice should be given (longer if stated by articles)-Shorter notice only valid if all members agree-Must specify time, date and place and that meeting is an AGM-Where notice given on website, it must be available from date of notification until conclusion of meeting (s309)

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 18: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

GENERAL MEETINGS Directors can, under articles, convene a general meeting whenever they see it

Directors of public and private companies may be required to convene general meeting by requisition of members (s303)

Requisitioning members of public companies must hold at least 10% of paid up share capital holding voting rights. For private companies, they need either 5% or 10% depending on when last meeting was held at which members has a right to vote(over 12 months ago= 5%, under 12 months = 10%)

(14 days notice required)Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 19: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

REQUISITIONING A ‘GM’ Members must deposit a signed requisition at

registered office or make request in electronic form

Must state the ‘objects of the meeting’; the resolutions proposed (s303(5))

Notice conveying meeting to be sent out within 21days and meeting must be held within 28 days of notice

If directors have not called meeting within 21 days of requisition, members may convene meeting for a date within 3 months of deposit of requisition

If no quorum present, meeting is adjournedLecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 20: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

GENERAL MEETINGS Court, on application of director or member entitled to vote, may order meeting shall be held and may give instructions for that purpose, including fixing quorum of one (s 306)

Auditor who gives statement of circumstances for resignation or other loss of office in their written notice may requisition a meeting to receive and consider their explanation (s 518)

Directors of a public company must convene a general meeting if net assets fall to half or less of the amount of its called-up share capital (s 656)

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 21: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

RESOLUTIONS1. Ordinary Resolution- For most businesses- Requires simple (50%+) majority of votes cast- 14 days notice

2. Special Resolution- For major changes- Requires 75% majority of votes cast- 14 days notice

3. Written Resolutions (Private companies only)- Used for all general meeting resolutions except

removing director or auditor before term expires- Either simple or 75% majority required depending on

business being passedLecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 22: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

SPECIAL RESOLUTIONS Main differences between ordinary and special

resolutions are:- Text of special resolution must be set out in full in

notice convening the meeting and must be described as special resolution

- Signed copy of every special resolution delivered to Registrar for filing

Special resolution required for major changes:- Change of name- Restriction of objects & alteration of articles- Reduction of share capital- Winding up of company- Presenting a petition by company for an order of

compulsory winding upLecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 23: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

WRITTEN RESOLUTIONS Private co. not required to hold GM, thus CA

provides mechanism for directors and members to conduct business solely by written resolutions

- Must be sent to each member eligible to vote by hard copy, electronically or by website

- Resolution must be accompanied by statement informing members:

1. How to signify their agreement to resolution2. Date the resolution must be passed by

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 24: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

CONTENTS OF NOTICE 21 days notice for AGM

- Date, time and place of meeting must be given- An AGM or special resolution must be described as

such- Information to be given of business of meeting

sufficient to enable members to understand what will be done at meeting

In issuing notice of AGM, standard practice to merely list items of ordinary or routine business:

- Declaration of dividends (if any)- Election of directors- Appointment of auditors and fixing their remuneration

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 25: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

SPECIAL NOTICE OF RESOLUTION

Notice of 28 days given to company by members:

- Remove auditor or appoint an auditor other than the one appointed at last year’s meeting

- Remove director from office or appoint substitute in their place after removal

On receiving special notice, public company may be obliged to include resolution in AGM notice

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 26: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

PROCEEDINGS OF MEETING Meeting only reaches binding decisions if:- Properly convened by notice- Quorum is present- Chairman presides- Business is properly transacted and resolutions put

to the vote

Usually only members with power to vote are present (except in full general meetings and class meetings)

Members may propose amendments to any resolution proposed and chairman approves or rejects

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 27: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

CHAIRMAN Articles usually provide that chairman of board of

directors preside at general meetings

Chairman derives authority from articles and has no voting rights unless articles give them one

Duties are to maintain order, and to deal with the agenda in a methodical way so that the businesses of the meeting may be properly transacted

Chairman may dissolve or adjourn meeting if it has become disorderly or if members present agree

Chairman must adjourn if the meeting instructs them to do so

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 28: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

QUORUM Minimum number of persons required to be present at

particular type of company meeting Usually the figure is 2 (in person or by proxy) unless

articles provide otherwise Proxy is an agent appointed by shareholder to vote on

behalf of that shareholder at company meetings (s 324) (has same voting rights as member)

Meeting of one member is not valid Can be quorum of one if:- Class meeting and all shares of that class held by 1

member- Court fixes the quorum at one- Company is single member private company Inquorate meetings should be adjourned

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 29: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

VOTING AND POLLS Usually one vote per share but preference shares may carry no

voting rights normally

Voting on a show of hands- Method of voting for or against resolution by raising hands- Each member has one vote irrespective of shareholding

Voting on a poll- Method of voting which allows member to use as many votes

as shareholding grants them- May be demanded by:- Not less than 5 members- Members representing not less than 1/10 of total voting rights

or of paid-up capital

- Number of votes cast determines the resultLecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 30: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

MINUTES OF MEETINGS CA 2006 provides that minutes have to be kept at all

general, directors’ and management meetings

Company required to keep minutes; formal written record of proceedings of GM for ten years (s 355)

Chairman normally signs the minutes making them admissible evidence of proceedings

Members of company have right to inspect minutes of general meetings which have to be held at registered office (or other permitted locations)

NOTE: A unanimous decision of members treated as substitute for formal decision in GM (assent principle)

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 31: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

CLASS MEETINGS Held where interests of different groups of

shareholders may be affected in different ways

- For variation of rights attached to different types of shares

Same procedural rules (such as issuing notices and voting) as for general meetings apply

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami

Page 32: COMPANY LAW: Ownership &  Management Part 2 - MEMBERS

SINGLE MEMBER PRIVATE COMPANIES Special rules for private companies with only one

shareholder

If sole member takes decision (normally taken in general meeting), that member shall (unless it is written resolution) provide company with a written record of it

Allows sole member to conduct members’ businesses informally without notice or minutes

Filing requirements still apply in case of alteration of articles

Lecturer: Rowin Gurusami